Characterization of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex isolates and microbiological outcome for patients treated with sulbactam-durlobactam in a phase 3 trial (ATTACK).

Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) causes severe, difficult-to-treat infections that are frequently antibiotic resistant. Sulbactam-durlobactam (SUL-DUR) is a targeted ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic designed to treat ABC infections, including those caused by multidrug-resistant strains. In a global, pathogen-specific, randomized, controlled phase 3 trial (ATTACK), the efficacy and safety of SUL-DUR were compared to colistin, both dosed with imipenem-cilastatin as background therapy, in patients with serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant ABC. Results from ATTACK showed that SUL-DUR met the criteria for non-inferiority to colistin for the primary efficacy endpoint of 28-day all-cause mortality with improved clinical and microbiological outcomes compared to colistin. This report describes the characterization of the baseline ABC isolates from patients enrolled in ATTACK, including an analysis of the correlation of microbiological outcomes with SUL-DUR MIC values and the molecular drivers of SUL-DUR resistance.

Microbiological profile of patients treated for postoperative peritonitis: temporal trends 1999-2019.

BACKGROUND: Temporal changes in the microbiological resistance profile have been reported in several life-threatening infections. However, no data have ever assessed this issue in postoperative peritonitis (POP). Our purpose was to assess the rate of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in POP over a two-decade period and to analyse their influence on the adequacy of empirical antibiotic therapy (EAT). METHODS: This retrospective monocentric analysis (1999-2019) addressed the changes over time in microbiologic data, including the emergence of MDROs and the adequacy of EAT for all intensive care unit adult patients treated for POP. The in vitro activities of 10 antibiotics were assessed to determine the most adequate EAT in the largest number of cases among 17 antibiotic regimens in patients with/without MDRO isolates. Our primary endpoint was to determine the frequency of MDRO and their temporal changes. Our second endpoint assessed the impact of MDROs on the adequacy of EAT per patient and their temporal changes based on susceptibility testing. In this analysis, the subgroup of patients with MDRO was compared with the subgroup of patients free of MDRO. RESULTS: A total of 1,318 microorganisms were cultured from 422 patients, including 188 (45%) patients harbouring MDROs. The growing proportions of MDR Enterobacterales were observed over time (p = 0.016), including ESBL-producing strains (p = 0.0013), mainly related to Klebsiella spp (p < 0.001). Adequacy of EAT was achieved in 305 (73%) patients. Decreased adequacy rates were observed when MDROs were cultured [p = 0.0001 vs. MDRO-free patients]. Over the study period, decreased adequacy rates were reported for patients receiving piperacillin/tazobactam in monotherapy or combined with vancomycin and imipenem/cilastatin combined with vancomycin (p < 0.01 in the three cases). In patients with MDROs, the combination of imipenem/cilastatin + vancomycin + amikacin or ciprofloxacin reached the highest adequacy rates (95% and 91%, respectively) and remained unchanged over time. CONCLUSIONS: We observed high proportions of MDRO in patients treated for POP associated with increasing proportions of MDR Enterobacterales over time. High adequacy rates were only achieved in antibiotic combinations involving carbapenems and vancomycin, while piperacillin/tazobactam is no longer a drug of choice for EAT in POP in infections involving MDRO.

Effectiveness and Safety of Intra-arterial Imipenem/Cilastatin Sodium Infusion for Patients with Hand Osteoarthritis-Related Interphalangeal Joint Pain.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intra-arterial imipenem/cilastatin sodium (IPM/CS) infusion for painful interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis (OA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with interphalangeal joint OA who underwent intra-arterial IPM/CS infusion were retrospectively evaluated. Intra-arterial infusions were performed via percutaneous wrist arterial access. The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA), and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale scores were assessed at intervals of 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Clinical success was evaluated based on PGIC. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for at least 6 months after treatment. Of them, 30 and 6 patients were followed up for 12 and 18 months, respectively. No severe or life-threatening adverse events were encountered. The mean NRS score was 6.0 ± 1.4 at baseline, which significantly decreased to 2.8 ± 1.4, 2.2 ± 1.9, and 2.4 ± 1.9 at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment, respectively (all P < .001). The mean NRS scores were 2.8 ± 1.7 and 2.9 ± 1.9 at 12 and 18 months, respectively, in the remaining patients. The mean FIHOA score significantly decreased from 9.8 ± 5.0 at the baseline to 4.1 ± 3.5 at 3 months (P < .001). The mean FIHOA score was 4.5 ± 3.3 at 12 months in the remaining 30 patients. The clinical success rates based on PGIC at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months were 62.1%, 77.6%, 70.7%, 63.4%, and 50.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-arterial IPM/CS infusion is a potential treatment option for interphalangeal joint OA refractory to medical management.

Beneficial herb-drug interaction of rhein in Jinhongtang and Imipenem/Cilastatin mediated by organic anion transporters.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Jinhongtang as a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula, has been widely used as a clinical adjuvant in the treatment of acute abdominal diseases and sepsis. Clinical benefits of the concurrent use of Jinhongtang and antibiotics have been observed, however, the mechanism has not been fully understood. AIM OF THE STUDY: The present study aimed to explore the effect of Jinhongtang on the antibacterial activity of Imipenem/Cilastatin and to clarify the underlying mechanism of herb-drug interaction (HDI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mouse model of sepsis induced by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) was used to evaluate the pharmacodynamic interaction in vivo. In vitro antibacterial activity of Imipenem/Cilastatin was studied by determining minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC). Pharmacokinetic interaction was investigated by pharmacokinetic studies in rats and uptake assays using OAT1/3-HEK293 cells. The main constituents ingested into blood of rats were qualitatively identified by UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS. RESULTS: Mice treated by Imipenem/Cilastatin and Jinhongtang exhibited higher survival rate, lower bacteria load and less inflammation in blood and lung tissues, compared with those treated by Imipenem/Cilastatin alone after injection of S. aureus. However, MIC and MBC of Imipenem/Cilastatin against S. aureus in vitro were not significantly changed in the presence of Jinhongtang. On the contrary, Jinhongtang increased the plasma concentration of Imipenem and decreased its urinary excretion in rats. CLr of Imipenem was reduced by 58.5%, while its half-life (t1/2) was prolonged for approximate 1.2 times after coadministered Jinhongtang. Furthermore, the extracts of Jinhongtang, single herb in the prescription, and main absorbable constituents inhibited cellular uptake of probe substrates and Imipenem by OAT1/3-HEK293 cells to different extents. Among them, rhein exhibited the strongest inhibition capacity with IC50 values of 0.08 ± 0.01 µM (OAT1) and 2.86 ± 0.28 µM (OAT3). Moreover, coadministration of rhein also significantly enhanced the antibacterial activity of Imipenem/Cilastatin in sepsis mice. CONCLUSION: Concomitant administration of Jinhongtang enhanced antibacterial activity of Imipenem/Cilastatin in sepsis mice induced by S. aureus through reducing renal elimination of Imipenem via inhibition of OATs. Our investigation provided the insight of Jinhongtang as an effective supplement to enhance the antibacterial activity of Imipenem/Cilastatin and can be useful for future clinical studies.

Postexposure Prophylaxis and Treatment of Bacillus anthracis Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Animal Models, 1947-2019.

BACKGROUND: Anthrax is endemic to many countries, including the United States. The causative agent, Bacillus anthracis, poses a global bioterrorism threat. Without effective antimicrobial postexposure prophylaxis (PEPAbx) and treatment, the mortality of systemic anthrax is high. To inform clinical guidelines for PEPAbx and treatment of B. anthracis infections in humans, we systematically evaluated animal anthrax treatment model studies. METHODS: We searched for survival outcome data in 9 scientific search engines for articles describing antimicrobial PEPAbx or treatment of anthrax in animals in any language through February 2019. We performed meta-analyses of efficacy of antimicrobial PEPAbx and treatment for each drug or drug combination using random-effects models. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships were developed for 5 antimicrobials with available pharmacokinetic data. Monte Carlo simulations were used to predict unbound drug exposures in humans. RESULTS: We synthesized data from 34 peer-reviewed studies with 3262 animals. For PEPAbx and treatment of infection by susceptible B. anthracis, effective monotherapy can be accomplished with fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, ß-lactams (including penicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and imipenem-cilastatin), and lipopeptides or glycopeptides. For naturally occurring strains, unbound drug exposures in humans were predicted to adequately cover the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs; those required to inhibit the growth of 50% or 90% of organisms [MIC50 or MIC90]) for ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and doxycycline for both the PEPAbx and treatment targets. Dalbavancin covered its MIC50 for PEPAbx. CONCLUSIONS: These animal studies show many reviewed antimicrobials are good choices for PEPAbx or treatment of susceptible B. anthracis strains, and some are also promising options for combating resistant strains. Monte Carlo simulations suggest that oral ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and doxycycline are particularly robust choices for PEPAbx or treatment.

Cefoxitin-based combination for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Endocarditis due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae is a rare but challenging condition. Its treatment relies on carbapenems alone or in combination, and no alternative has been described to date. The cephamycin cefoxitin has been used for treatment of mild ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections. CASE PRESENTATION: We report two patients with nosocomial endocarditis due to ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae who underwent clinical failure or adverse event, respectively, during treatment with imipenem-cilastatin. The first patient was subsequently treated with cefoxitin combined with ciprofloxacin with a favorable outcome. In the second patient, the endocarditis relapsed following a 6-week treatment with cefoxitin and fosfomycin. In time-kill assays, the cefoxitin/ciprofloxacin and cefoxitin/fosfomycin combinations showed synergistic effect. CONCLUSION: These cases illustrate that cefoxitin is an interesting alternative to carbapenems, even in severe infections such as endocarditis. Pharmacokinetic optimization and combination with another synergistic antibiotic should be considered whenever possible.

Imipenem cilastatin sodium-associated thrombocytopenia in an older patient: A case report and literature review.

Imipenem cilastatin sodium, as a member of a new generation of ß-lactam antibiotics, has a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity and a very wide range of application. Thrombocytopenia has been reported as a rare adverse event in several studies of patients treated with imipenem cilastatin sodium. In this study, we present a case of thrombocytopenia associated with imipenem cilastatin sodium in an older patient. The 78-year-old male patient with pulmonary infection was initiated on anti-infection therapy with imipenem cilastatin sodium. On the 9th day after imipenem cilastatin sodium administration, the patient experienced a sudden and dramatic decrease in platelet count. Similarly, on the 4th day after the re-administration of imipenem cilastatin sodium for anti-infection therapy, the patient's platelet count showed a remarkable downward trend again. A time correlation between the drug therapy and the occurrence of platelet reaction was found. The patient's platelet count gradually returned to the normal level on the 6th day after the first drug withdrawal and the 13th day after the second drug withdrawal, respectively. Considering the widespread use of imipenem cilastatin sodium, healthcare providers should improve the notification of thrombocytopenia associated with imipenem cilastatin sodium.

Who gets treated for influenza: A surveillance study from the US Food and Drug Administration's Sentinel System.

OBJECTIVE: We describe the baseline characteristics and complications of individuals with influenza in the US FDA's Sentinel System by antiviral treatment timing. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort design. PATIENTS: Individuals aged ≥6 months with outpatient diagnoses of influenza in June 2014-July 2017, 3 influenza seasons. METHODS: We identified the comorbidities, vaccination history, influenza testing, and outpatient antiviral dispensings of individuals with influenza using administrative claims data from 13 data partners including the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, integrated delivery systems, and commercial health plans. We assessed complications within 30 days: hospitalization, oxygen use, mechanical ventilation, critical care, ECMO, and death. RESULTS: There were 1,090,333 influenza diagnoses in 2014-2015; 1,005,240 in 2016-2017; and 578,548 in 2017-2018. Between 49% and 55% of patients were dispensed outpatient treatment within 5 days. In all periods >80% of treated individuals received treatment on the day of diagnosis. Those treated on days 1-5 after diagnosis had higher prevalences of diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and obesity compared to those treated on the day of diagnosis or not treated at all. They also had higher rates of hospitalization, oxygen use, and critical care. In 2014-2015, among those aged ≥65 years, the rates of hospitalization were 45 per 1,000 diagnoses among those treated on day 0; 74 per 1,000 among those treated on days 1-5; and 50 per 1,000 among those who were untreated. CONCLUSIONS: In a large, national analysis, approximately half of people diagnosed with influenza in the outpatient setting were treated with antiviral medications. Delays in outpatient dispensed treatment were associated with higher prevalence of comorbidities and higher rates of complication.

Investigating the need for therapeutic drug monitoring of imipenem in critically ill patients: Are we getting it right?

BACKGROUND: The drug levels and clearances of imipenem in critically ill patients are not comprehensively described in current literature, yet it is vital that adequate levels be achieved for therapeutic success. OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of critically ill patients treated with imipenem/cilastatin with sub-therapeutic imipenem plasma levels, and to compare the clinical outcomes of those patients with therapeutic levels with those who had sub-therapeutic levels. METHODS: Trough imipenem plasma levels of 68 critically ill patients from a surgical intensive care unit were measured using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. Imipenem trough levels were compared with the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the causative bacterial agents, based on a target value of 100% time above MIC (¦T >MIC). RESULTS: The proportion of participants with sub-therapeutic imipenem levels was 22% (95% confidence interval (CI) 13% - 34%). The 14- and 28-day mortality rates in the sub-therapeutic group were 33% and 40%, respectively, compared with 19% (p=0.293) and 26% (p=0.346), respectively, in the therapeutic group. Sub-therapeutic imipenem plasma levels are associated with adjusted hazard ratio of 1.47 (95% CI 0.55 - 3.91). CONCLUSIONS: The lower proportion of critically ill patients with sub-therapeutic imipenem plasma levels in this study compared with previous studies may be attributed to the practice of higher dosages and the administration method of extended infusions of imipenem/cilastatin in our setting. The results demonstrate a trend of higher mortality in patients with sub-therapeutic imipenem levels, although the results were not statistically significant at this sample size.

Embolic Characteristics of Imipenem-Cilastatin Particles in Vitro and in Vivo: Implications for Transarterial Embolization in Joint Arthropathies.

PURPOSE: To elucidate in vitro and in vivo characteristics and embolic properties of imipenem-cilastatin (IPM-CS) compared with hydrogel microspheres. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Particle size distribution was microscopically evaluated with 3 samples of 50 mg IPM-CS suspensions in each of 6 conditions by a mixture of contrast volume: 500 or 1000 µL and vortex mixing time: 5, 10, or 30 s. Time-dependent changes up to 3 h post-mixing were also evaluated. Fifteen male Sprague-Dawley rats (460.2 ± 5.0 g) underwent unilateral renal artery embolization using IPM-CS (n = 11) or hydrogel microspheres (n = 4). Follow-up angiography 48 h after embolization and histological evaluation, including acute tubular necrosis (ATN) and inflammation, were scored using a 5-point scale (from 0 = normal to 4 = severe). RESULTS: Over 91% of IPM-CS particles were <40 µm under all in vitro conditions. With the increased contrast volume, the average particle size also increased (mean ± standard deviation: 11.6 ± 13.9 vs 16.7 ± 18.2 µm for 500 and 1000 µL iodinated contrast, P < .001); however, the impact of the mixing/elapsed time were limited. At 48 h after embolization, all cases in the IPM-CS groups (11/11) showed major to complete recanalization versus no recanalization with hydrogel microspheres (0/4) (P < .001). The following are the median ATN and inflammation grades in the cortex (ventral/dorsal) and medulla (ventral/dorsal) in both groups: IPM-CS, ATN in cortex (2/4) and medulla (1/1), inflammation in cortex (0/0) and medulla (0/0); hydrogel microspheres, ATN in cortex (4/4) and medulla (3/2), inflammation in cortex (1/1) and medulla (1/1). CONCLUSIONS: IPM-CS suspension generated particles that were predominantly smaller than 40 µm and with unique short-term embolic effects, leaving predominantly peripheral ischemic changes.

Elevated serum ß-d-glucan levels in cavitary pulmonary nocardiosis.

An 86-year-old woman with Borrmann type III colorectal cancer (Union for International Cancer Control pT4aN2bM1c, pStage IVc) had received dexamethasone for the last 6 months as palliative care. She presented with a low-grade fever, chest pain and cough. Chest radiography on admission showed cavities and consolidations bilaterally in the upper lobes. A blood examination on admission revealed highly elevated serum ß-d-glucan levels. The diagnosis by bronchoscopy was pulmonary nocardiosis. With trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and imipenem/cilastatin, the ß-d-glucan levels were decreased, and chest X-ray showed improvement after 1 month. ß-d-glucan is known to be a biomarker of fungal infection. It is possible that ß-d-glucan levels also indicate a pulmonary infection by Nocardia.

The cost-effectiveness of empirical antibiotic treatments for high-risk febrile neutropenic patients: A decision analytic model.

PURPOSE: Febrile neutropenia has a significant clinical and economic impact on cancer patients. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of different current empiric antibiotic treatments. METHODS: A decision analytic model was constructed to compare the use of cefepime, meropenem, imipenem/cilastatin, and piperacillin/tazobactam for treatment of high-risk patients. The analysis was performed from the perspective of U.S.-based hospitals. The time horizon was defined to be a single febrile neutropenia episode. Cost-effectiveness was determined by calculating costs and deaths averted. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for various willingness-to-pay thresholds (WTP), were used to address the uncertainty in cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: The base-case analysis results showed that treatments were equally effective but differed mainly in their cost. In increasing order: treatment with imipenem/cilastatin cost $52,647, cefepime $57,270, piperacillin/tazobactam $57,277, and meropenem $63,778. In the probabilistic analysis, mean costs were $52,554 (CI: $52,242-$52,866) for imipenem/cilastatin, $57,272 (CI: $56,951-$57,593) for cefepime, $57,294 (CI: $56,978-$57,611) for piperacillin/tazobactam, and $63,690 (CI: $63,370-$64,009) for meropenem. Furthermore, with a WTP set at $0 to $50,000, imipenem/cilastatin was cost-effective in 66.2% to 66.3% of simulations compared to all other high-risk options. DISCUSSION: Imipenem/cilastatin is a cost-effective strategy and results in considerable health care cost-savings at various WTP thresholds. Cost-effectiveness analyses can be used to differentiate the treatments of febrile neutropenia in high-risk patients.

Imipenem/cilastatin sodium/relebactam fixed combination to treat urinary infections and complicated intra-abdominal bacterial infections.

Imipenem/cilastatin sodium/relebactam is a combination of imipenem/cilastatin, a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antibiotic, and ß-lactamase inhibitor relebactam which has been developed for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) and complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) due to drug-resistant bacterial pathogens. The combination (Recarbrio) has been designated as a qualified infectious disease product (QIDP) and obtained FDA approval in 2019 for the treatment of cUTI and cIAI caused by susceptible Gram-negative microorganisms in adult patients with limited or no alternative treatment options. The product was also approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2020 for the treatment of infections due to aerobic Gram-negative organisms in adults with limited treatment options.

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes between Analysis Populations in the RESTORE-IMI 1 Phase 3 Trial of Imipenem-Cilastatin-Relebactam versus Colistin plus Imipenem-Cilastatin in Patients with Imipenem-Nonsusceptible Bacterial Infections.

The RESTORE-IMI 1 phase 3 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of imipenem-cilastatin (IMI) combined with relebactam (REL) for treating imipenem-nonsusceptible infections. The objective of this analysis was to compare the outcomes among patients meeting eligibility requirements based on central laboratory susceptibility versus local laboratory susceptibility. Patients with serious infections caused by imipenem-nonsusceptible, colistin-susceptible, and imipenem-REL-susceptible pathogens were randomized 2:1 to IMI-REL plus placebo or colistin plus IMI for 5 to 21 days. The primary endpoint was a favorable overall response. Key endpoints included the clinical response and all-cause mortality. We compared outcomes between the primary microbiological modified intent-to-treat (mMITT) population, where eligibility was based on central laboratory susceptibility testing, and the supplemental mMITT (SmMITT) population, where eligibility was based on local, site-level testing. The SmMITT (n = 41) and MITT (n = 31) populations had similar baseline characteristics, including sex, age, illness severity, and renal function. In both analysis populations, favorable overall response rates in the IMI-REL treatment group were >70%. Favorable clinical response rates at day 28 were 71.4% for IMI-REL and 40.0% for colistin plus IMI in the mMITT population, whereas they were 75.0% for IMI-REL and 53.8% for colistin plus IMI in the SmMITT population. Day 28 all-cause mortality rates were 9.5% for IMI-REL and 30.0% for colistin plus IMI in the mMITT population, whereas they were 10.7% for IMI-REL and 23.1% for colistin plus IMI in the SmMITT population. The outcomes in the SmMITT population were generally consistent with those in the mMITT population, suggesting that outcomes may be applicable to the real-world use of IMI-REL for treating infections caused by imipenem-nonsusceptible Gram-negative pathogens. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02452047.).

Comparative review of imipenem/cilastatin versus meropenem.

INTRODUCTION: Carbapenems are broad-spectrum antibacterial molecules. Imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem are the two main molecules used in French healthcare services. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the relative strengths and weaknesses of these two molecules by considering their pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, microbiological, and clinical properties. We demonstrated that imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem are not alike. METHOD: Review of the literature by querying the MEDLINE network. RESULTS: Imipenem-cilastatin is the first marketed molecule of the carbapenem class. It is more effective against Gram-positive cocci. Its stability does not allow for long infusions and its main adverse effect on the central nervous system limits its use. Meropenem is more effective against Gram-negative bacilli. Its stability and its milder adverse effects distinguish it from imipenem-cilastatin. CONCLUSION: Meropenem is preferred for daily use in healthcare services when carbapenems are to be used.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Imipenem-Cilastatin/Relebactam Combination Therapy.

On 16 July, 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration approved imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam (Recarbrio™) for the treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections. This decision was based on substantial clinical and pre-clinical data, including rigorous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic work, and is an important step forward in the management of these debilitating conditions. This article provides an overview of the body of research associated with imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam, beginning with an examination of the fundamental underpinnings of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index. This is followed by the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic work that led to the approval of this novel drug combination, including data derived from checkerboard and hollow fiber infection studies, as well as large, multi-center, phase III clinical trials known as RESTORE-IMI 1 and RESTORE-IMI 2. The article also explores how this important new antibiotic may be used to treat other infections in the years to come, including hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia attributed to imipenem-non-susceptible pathogens and certain atypical mycobacterial infections.

Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Intravenous Sulbactam-Durlobactam with Imipenem-Cilastatin in Hospitalized Adults with Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Acute Pyelonephritis.

Durlobactam (DUR; ETX2514) is a novel ß-lactamase inhibitor with broad-spectrum activity against Ambler class A, C, and D ß-lactamases. Durlobactam restores the in vitro activity of sulbactam (SUL) against members of the Acinetobacter baumannii-A. calcoaceticus complex (ABC). Sulbactam (SUL)-durlobactam (SUL-DUR) is under development for the treatment of ABC infections. Eighty patients with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), including acute pyelonephritis (AP), were randomized 2:1 to receive SUL-DUR at 1 g/1 g intravenously (i.v.) or placebo every 6 h (q6h) for 7 days and background therapy with imipenem-cilastatin (IMI) at 500 mg i.v. q6h to evaluate the tolerability of SUL-DUR in hospitalized patients. Patients with bacteremia could receive up to 14 days of therapy. SUL-DUR tolerability and the values of various pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were determined. Efficacy was recorded at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit. SUL-DUR was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events (AEs) being reported. Headache (5.7%), nausea (3.8%), diarrhea (3.8%), and vascular pain (3.8%) were the most common drug-related AEs with SUL-DUR and were mostly of mild or moderate severity. The PK profile of DUR and SUL in hospitalized patients was consistent with observations in healthy volunteers. Overall success in the microbiological modified intent-to-treat (m-MITT) population was similar between the groups, as would be expected with IMI background therapy in all patients (overall success at the TOC visit, 76.6% [n = 36] with SUL-DUR and 81.0% [n = 17] with placebo). SUL-DUR in combination with IMI was well tolerated in patients with cUTIs. The pharmacokinetics of SUL-DUR observed in hospitalized patients was similar to that observed in healthy volunteers. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03445195.).

Prevention of Infectious Complications in Acute Pancreatitis: Results of a Single-Center, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the efficiency of imipenem to prevent infectious complications in predicted severe acute pancreatitis (AP). METHODS: Consecutive AP patients were randomized to imipenem 3 × 500 mg intravenously daily or an identical placebo. Exclusion criteria were prior AP, chronic pancreatitis, active malignancy, immune deficiency, active infection, concomitant antibiotic treatment, pregnancy, and patients younger than 18 years. Infectious complications including infected pancreatic necrosis, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, positive blood cultures, sepsis, and other infections were assessed as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included mortality, persistent organ failure, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, local complications, serious adverse events, and need for surgical intervention. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were randomized to each group. Infectious complications were present in 10 versus 12 of 49 patients (relative risk [RR], 0.833; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.398-1.747). There were no significant differences in infected pancreatic necrosis (RR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.262-8.588), pneumonia (RR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.262-8.588), urinary tract infection (RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.152-2.374), positive blood cultures (RR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.047-5.336), sepsis (RR, 0.333; 95% CI, 0.036-3.095), and other (RR, 1.333; 95% CI, 0.315-5.648). We found no significant differences in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Concordantly to available evidence, there is currently no ground to support prophylactic use of antibiotics in predicted severe AP.

A case of pleural effusion caused by Mycobacterium fortuitum and Mycobacterium mageritense coinfection.

BACKGROUND: Non-tuberculous mycobacteria cause chronic pulmonary infection, but pleuritis and pleural effusion are rarely associated with infection with non-tuberculous mycobacteria, especially rapid-growing mycobacteria. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis who was using prednisone, azathioprine, and certolizumab pegol presented complaining of fever, dry cough, and night sweats for the past 2 weeks. Chest examination revealed bilateral opacity that was more pronounced on her right side. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and pleural effusion fluid were obtained, and revealed coinfection with Mycobacterium fortuitum and Mycobacterium mageritense. Imipenem/cilastatin, levofloxacin, and minocycline were prescribed for 6 months, and the patient was well and asymptomatic for the subsequent 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case report describing pleural effusion associated with coinfection with two different mycobacterial species. If the species cannot be identified, the possibility of mycobacterial coinfection should be considered.