Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.089
Filter
1.
BMC Psychiatry ; 24(1): 365, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750479

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of escitalopram and sertraline in post-stroke depression (PSD) patients, to provide more reliable therapeutics for cardiovascular and psychiatric clinical practice. METHODS: We recruited 60 patients (aged 40-89 years old) with an ICD-10 diagnosis of PSD, who were then randomly assigned to two groups and treated with flexible doses of escitalopram (10 to 20 mg/day, n = 30) or sertraline (50 to 200 mg/day, n = 30) for consecutive 8 weeks, respectively. The 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-24), the 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA-14), the Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MOCA), and the Activity of Daily Living scale (ADL) were used to assess patients before, during, and after treatment for depression, anxiety, adverse effects, cognitive function, and daily living activities. Repeated measures ANOVA, the Mann-Whitney U test, the chi-square test (χ2), or Fisher's exact test was employed to assess baseline demographics, response rate, adverse effects rate, and changes in other clinical variables. RESULTS: Significant reduction in HAMD-24 and HAMA-14 scores was evaluated at baseline, as well as 1, 3, 4, 6, and 8 weeks of drug intervention (p < 0.01). There was a significant group difference in post-treatment HAMD-24 scores (p < 0.05), but no difference was observed in HAMA-14 scores (p > 0.05). Further analysis showed a significant variance in the HAMD-24 scores between the two groups at the end of the first week (p < 0.01). The incidence of adverse effects in both patient groups was mild, but there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). The improvement in cognitive function and the recovery of daily living abilities were comparable between both groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Escitalopram and sertraline showed comparable efficacy for anxiety symptoms, cognitive function, and daily living abilities in PSD patients. In addition, escitalopram was more appropriate for alleviating depressive symptoms. To validate the conclusion, trials with a larger sample size are in demand in the future. The registration number is ChiCTR1800017373.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Escitalopram , Sertraline , Stroke , Humans , Sertraline/therapeutic use , Sertraline/adverse effects , Male , Aged , Female , Middle Aged , Stroke/complications , Stroke/drug therapy , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Escitalopram/therapeutic use , Escitalopram/adverse effects , Depression/drug therapy , Depression/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Citalopram/therapeutic use , Citalopram/adverse effects
4.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 115(4): 860-870, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38297828

ABSTRACT

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) are the first-line pharmacologic treatment for anxiety and depressive disorders in children and adolescents. Many patients experience side effects that are difficult to predict, are associated with significant morbidity, and can lead to treatment discontinuation. Variation in SSRI pharmacokinetics could explain differences in treatment outcomes, but this is often overlooked as a contributing factor to SSRI tolerability. This study evaluated data from 288 escitalopram-treated and 255 sertraline-treated patients ≤ 18 years old to develop machine learning models to predict side effects using electronic health record data and Bayesian estimated pharmacokinetic parameters. Trained on a combined cohort of escitalopram- and sertraline-treated patients, a penalized logistic regression model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.77 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.88), with 0.69 sensitivity (95% CI: 0.54-0.86), and 0.82 specificity (95% CI: 0.72-0.87). Medication exposure, clearance, and time since the last dose increase were among the top features. Individual escitalopram and sertraline models yielded an AUROC of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.65-0.81) and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.55-0.73), respectively. Post hoc analysis showed sertraline-treated patients with activation side effects had slower clearance (P = 0.01), which attenuated after accounting for age (P = 0.055). These findings raise the possibility that a machine learning approach leveraging pharmacokinetic data can predict escitalopram- and sertraline-related side effects. Clinicians may consider differences in medication pharmacokinetics, especially during dose titration and as opposed to relying on dose, when managing side effects. With further validation, application of this model to predict side effects may enhance SSRI precision dosing strategies in youth.


Subject(s)
Escitalopram , Sertraline , Child , Adolescent , Humans , Sertraline/adverse effects , Citalopram/adverse effects , Bayes Theorem , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects
5.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 17(3): 247-253, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38299560

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We assessed pharmacokinetic correlates of treatment response to escitalopram using a large therapeutic drug monitoring database. METHODS: A large naturalistic sample of patients receiving escitalopram was analyzed. Responders were defined as 'very much improved' or 'much improved' based on the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement score, CGI-I. We compared responders (n = 83) vs. non-responders (n = 388) with the primary outcome being the escitalopram plasma concentration and concentration corrected by the daily dose (C/D ratio). Effects of age, sex, body-mass-index (BMI), and C/D ratio were assessed in a multivariate logistic regression model predicting response. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in clinical and demographic characteristics between responders vs. non-responders. There were also no differences between escitalopram daily doses or plasma concentrations, while C/D ratios were significantly higher in non-responders than in responders (1.6 ± 1.7 vs. 1.2 ± 0.9 (ng/mL)/(mg/day), p = 0.007); C/D ratios (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.80, p < 0.003) were associated with response to escitalopram, after controlling for age, sex, and BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low clearance of escitalopram as reflected upon high C/D ratios may be less likely respond to escitalopram. Identifying these patients during dose titration may support clinical decision-making, including switching to a different antidepressant instead of increasing daily dose.


Subject(s)
Citalopram , Escitalopram , Humans , Citalopram/adverse effects , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol ; 34(1): 42-51, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38377518

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Escitalopram is an effective and generally well-tolerated antidepressant, but children of parents with bipolar disorder (BD) may be at increased risk for adverse events associated with antidepressants, including increased irritability, restlessness, impulsivity, and manic symptoms. This risk may be influenced by polymorphisms in genes encoding cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP2C19 or CYP2D6), the serotonin transporter (SLC6A4), and the serotonin receptor 2A subtype (HTR2A). We explored whether gene-drug interactions influence the emergence of adverse events in depressed and/or anxious youth with a family history of BD. Materials and Methods: Children and adolescents aged 12-17 years with a first-degree relative with bipolar I disorder were treated with escitalopram and monitored for adverse effects, underwent pharmacogenetic testing, and provided serum escitalopram levels. Emergence of adverse events was determined by study clinicians, and symptoms were tracked using the Treatment-Emergent Activation and Suicidality Assessment Profile (TEASAP) and Pediatric Adverse Events Rating Scale. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines were used to determine CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 phenotypes. Results: Slower CYP2C19 metabolizers had greater dose-normalized 24-hour area under the curve (AUC0-24; p = 0.025), trough concentrations (Ctrough; p = 0.013), and elimination half-lives (t1/2; p < 0.001). CYP2D6 phenotype was not significantly associated with any pharmacokinetic parameter. Slower CYP2D6 metabolizers had increased TEASAP akathisia (p = 0.015) scores. HTR2A A/A and A/G genotypes were associated with increased TEASAP "self-injury, suicidality, and harm to others" subscale scores (p = 0.017). Escitalopram maximum concentration, AUC0-24, CYP2C19 phenotype, and SLC6A4 genotype were not associated with adverse events. Conclusions: CYP2C19 phenotype influences escitalopram pharmacokinetics whereas CYP2D6 phenotype does not. Slower CYP2D6 metabolism was associated with increased akathisia, and HTR2A A/A or A/G genotypes were associated with increased risk of self-harm or harm to others. Larger cohorts are needed to identify associations between genetic test results and antidepressant-associated adverse events. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02553161.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Citalopram , Humans , Adolescent , Child , Citalopram/adverse effects , Escitalopram , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/genetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/genetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/genetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/metabolism , Pharmacogenetics , Psychomotor Agitation/drug therapy , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Genotype , Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics
7.
Can J Psychiatry ; 69(3): 183-195, 2024 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37796764

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction is frequently reported by individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) on antidepressants, which negatively impacts treatment adherence and efficacy. We investigated the association of polymorphisms in pharmacokinetic genes encoding cytochrome-P450 drug-metabolizing enzymes, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6, and the transmembrane efflux pump, P-glycoprotein (i.e., ABCB1), on treatment-emergent changes in sexual function (SF) and sexual satisfaction (SS) in the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression 1 (CAN-BIND-1) sample. METHODS: A total of 178 adults with MDD received treatment with escitalopram (ESC) from weeks 0-8 (Phase I). At week 8, nonresponders were augmented with aripiprazole (ARI) (i.e., ESC + ARI, n = 91), while responders continued ESC (i.e., ESC-Only, n = 80) from weeks 8-16 (Phase II). SF and SS were evaluated using the sex effects (SexFX) scale at weeks 0, 8, and 16. We assessed the primary outcomes, SF and SS change for weeks 0-8 and 8-16, using repeated measures mixed-effects models. RESULTS: In ESC-Only, CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizer (IM) + poor metabolizers (PMs) showed treatment-related improvements in sexual arousal, a subdomain of SF, from weeks 8-16, relative to CYP2C19 normal metabolizers (NMs) who showed a decline, F(2,54) = 8.00, p < 0.001, q = 0.048. Specifically, CYP2C19 IM + PMs reported less difficulty with having and sustaining vaginal lubrication in females and erection in males, compared to NMs. Furthermore, ESC-Only females with higher concentrations of ESC metabolite, S-desmethylcitalopram (S-DCT), and S-DCT/ESC ratio in serum demonstrated more decline in SF (r = -0.42, p = 0.004, q = 0.034) and SS (r = -0.43, p = 0.003, q = 0.034), respectively, which was not observed in males. ESC-Only females also demonstrated a trend for a correlation between S-DCT and sexual arousal change in the same direction (r = -0.39, p = 0.009, q = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS: CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotypes may be influencing changes in sexual arousal related to ESC monotherapy. Thus, preemptive genotyping of CYP2C19 may help to guide selection of treatment that circumvents selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-related sexual dysfunction thereby improving outcomes for patients. Additionally, further research is warranted to clarify the role of S-DCT in the mechanisms underlying ESC-related changes in SF and SS. This CAN-BIND-1 study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01655706) on 27 July 2012.


Subject(s)
Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6 , Depressive Disorder, Major , Adult , Male , Female , Humans , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/genetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/metabolism , Aripiprazole/adverse effects , Escitalopram , Citalopram/adverse effects , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/genetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/genetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/metabolism , Depression , Canada , Biomarkers , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B
8.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 48(9): 1343-1349, 2023.
Article in English, Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38044645

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Depression is often accompanied by various degrees of cognitive decline, with a high incidence. Guidelines recommend medication combined with psychological therapy. Solution focused group therapy (SFGT) is a newer group psychotherapy technique. This study aims to explore the difference between SFGT combined with escitalopram and only use escitalopram in treating depression. METHODS: A total of 84 patients who met the diagnostic criteria of international classification of diseases-10 (ICD-10) were enrolled into the combined group (SFGT combined with escitalopram, n=42) and the control group (only escitalopram, n=42) for an 8-week treatment. Patients were measured with the 24-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-24) and the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI) at baseline (T0), week 4 (T1), and week 8 (T2), respectively. Differences in depressive symptoms and cognitive flexibility between the 2 groups were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: At T2, 8 patients were dislodged in the combined group and 10 in the control group. There was no difference in the subscales and total scores of HAMD-24 and CFI between the 2 groups at T0 (all P>0.05). At T1 and T2, compared with the control group, the total scores and anxiety somatization, cognitive impairment, delay, and a sense of despair subscales scores of HAMD-24 were lower, and the total scores and subscales scores of CFI in the combined group were higher (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: SFGT combined with escitalopram is more effective than monotherapy for improving the anxiety somatization symptoms, cognitive impairment, retardation symptoms and despair symptoms, and increasing the cognitive flexibility.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder , Psychotherapy, Group , Humans , Citalopram/therapeutic use , Citalopram/adverse effects , Depression/therapy , Escitalopram , Depressive Disorder/complications , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Cognition , Treatment Outcome
9.
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova ; 123(11. Vyp. 2): 46-54, 2023.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38127700

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of escitalopram in the form of oral dispersible tablets (Elicea Q-Tab) in real-life clinical practice in patients with depressive and anxiety disorders. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 1.892 outpatient patients, 1.860 of whom completed participation in accordance with the protocol and entered the statistical analysis. Most patients were diagnosed with depressive and anxiety disorders of varying severity, as a rule, these diagnoses were established for the first time. The drug was most often prescribed at a dosage of 10 mg/day. The patients were monitored for 90 days and at each of the 3 visits, scales were used to assess the clinical condition (CGI-S and CGI-I), scales «Interaction with people, maintaining relationships (social functioning)¼ and «Availability of work, task completion, school attendance (professional functioning)¼, scales satisfaction with the convenience of admission/appointment and the effectiveness of treatment, various indicators of quality of life (autonomy, social and professional functioning, hobbies and hobbies), as well as the severity of cognitive disorders were measured. RESULTS: Patients treated with escitalopram in the form of oral tablets dispersible in the oral cavity (Elicea Q-Tab) showed an improvement in their clinical condition (a decrease in CGI-S scores from 3.65 at visit 1 to 2.63 by visit 3, by 28%; a decrease in CGI-I scores from 2.39 at visit 1 to 1.57 to visit 3, by 34%), as well as improving the quality of life, social (from 2.74 points on 1 visit to 4.32 on 2 visits, by 58%) and professional functioning (from 2.81 on 1 visit to 4.35 on 2 visits, by 55%), the level of concentration (from 3.28 points on 1 visit up to 4.5 on 3 visits, by 37%). Doctors and patients noted high satisfaction with the effectiveness and convenience of using the drug, the frequency of adverse events was low. CONCLUSION: The study showed that escitalopram in the form of oral tablets dispersible in the oral cavity (Elicea Q-Tab) is an efficient and safe treatment for depressive and anxiety disorders in real-world clinical settings. Patients and physicians have evaluated the drug positively and it can be considered as an effective agent in psychiatric practice.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Escitalopram , Humans , Quality of Life , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Citalopram/therapeutic use , Citalopram/adverse effects
10.
EBioMedicine ; 95: 104779, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37639937

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For a decade, patients have been advised against using high citalopram- and escitalopram-doses due to risk for ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac arrest. Still, these drugs are widely used to treat depression and anxiety especially in older patients. It is unclear why they are cardiotoxic and at what serum concentrations patients are at risk for arrhythmias. Thus, how many patients that are at risk for iatrogenic cardiac arrest is unknown. METHODS: We studied the arrhythmogenic effects of citalopram, escitalopram and their metabolites on human cardiomyocytes. Concentrations showing pro-arrhythmic activity were compared with observed drug and metabolite serum concentrations in a cohort of 19,742 patients (age 12-105 years) using escitalopram or citalopram in Norway (2010-2019). As arrhythmia-risk is related to maximum serum concentration, this was simulated for different age-groups from the escitalopram patient material. FINDINGS: Therapeutic concentrations of both citalopram and escitalopram but not their metabolites showed pro-arrhythmic changes in the human cardiac action potential. Due to age-dependent reduction of drug clearance, the proportion of patients above threshold for arrhythmia-risk increased with age. 20% of patients >65 years were predicted to reach potentially pro-arrhythmic concentrations, following intake of 10 mg escitalopram. INTERPRETATION: All patients that are using escitalopram or citalopram and have genetic disposition for acquired long-QT syndrome, are >65 years, are using additional pro-arrhythmic drugs or have predisposition for arrhythmias, should be monitored with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to avoid exposure to potentially cardiotoxic concentrations. Serum concentrations should be kept below 100 nM, to reduce arrhythmia-risk. FUNDING: This study was funded by The Research Council of Norway (project number: 324062).


Subject(s)
Heart Arrest , Prodrugs , Humans , Aged , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Citalopram/adverse effects , Escitalopram , Action Potentials , Cardiotoxicity , Myocytes, Cardiac
11.
Drug Res (Stuttg) ; 73(8): 465-472, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37647930

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Premature menopause and hot flashes are the main complications of breast cancer treatments. About 40 to 50 percent of breast cancer women who undergo chemotherapy are experiencing premature menopause symptoms, including hot flashes. Some endocrine therapies such as tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors are associated with induction or aggravating hot flashes. Hot flashes are often debilitating and significantly impair daily functions. Therefore many therapeutic options have been studied so far for the management of this adverse effect. However, there are still some clinical challenges in managing hot flashes in patients with breast cancer. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of venlafaxine and citalopram on hot flashes in breast cancer women receiving tamoxifen. DESIGN: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in forty-one, 35 to 65 years old female patients. The study lasted for four weeks, and the follow-up was for two months. Venlafaxine and citalopram treatments started with doses of 37.5 mg or 10 mg, respectively. Venlafaxine and citalopram dosages were increased in the second week to 75 and 20 mg, respectively. The study was conducted during the year 2017. KEY RESULTS: The results indicated that the total efficacy was significantly different in groups receiving citalopram, venlafaxine, and placebo. Total efficacy in the placebo group, venlafaxine, and citalopram was 14.3, 53.8, and 64.3%, respectively (p=0.02). During the second week, the efficacy in groups receiving citalopram, venlafaxine, and placebo was 57.1, 53.8, and 14.3%, respectively (p=0.04). Generally, both citalopram and venlafaxine were well tolerated. The associated adverse effects were mild to moderate in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although citalopram was associated with more adverse effects, including constipation, it was more effective in reducing the frequency of hot flashes when compared to venlafaxine or placebo.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Menopause, Premature , Female , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Citalopram/adverse effects , Venlafaxine Hydrochloride/adverse effects , Hot Flashes/chemically induced , Hot Flashes/drug therapy , Hot Flashes/complications , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Tamoxifen/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome
12.
Biotech Histochem ; 98(7): 479-491, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37466068

ABSTRACT

Citalopram is a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant; it exhibits the greatest cardiotoxic effect among SSRIs. Citalopram can cause drug-induced long QT syndrome (LQTS) and ventricular arrhythmias. We investigated the protective effect of nicorandil, a selective mitochondrial KATP (mito-KATP) channel opener, on LQTS and myocardial damage caused by citalopram in male rats. In a preliminary study, we determined that the minimum citalopram dose that prolonged the QT interval was 102 mg/kg injected intraperitoneally. For the main study, rats were divided randomly into five experimental groups: untreated control, normal saline + citalopram, nicorandil + citalopram, 5-hydroxydecanoate (5-HD) + citalopram, 5-HD + nicorandil + citalopram. Biochemical and histologic data from blood and heart tissue samples from six untreated control rats were evaluated. Electrocardiographic parameters including QRS duration, QT interval, corrected QT interval (QTc) and heart rate (HR) were assessed, and biochemical parameters including malondialdehyde, reduced glutathione, glutathione peroxidase, superoxide dismutase were measured. We also performed histomorphologic and immunohistochemical examination of heart tissue. Citalopram prolonged QT-QTc intervals significantly and increased significantly the histomorphologic score and proportion of apoptotic cells, but produced no differences in the oxidant and antioxidant parameters. Nicorandil did not prevent citalopram induced QT-QTc interval prolongation and produced no significant changes in oxidant and antioxidant parameters; however, it did reduce histologic damage and apoptosis caused by citalopram.


Subject(s)
Long QT Syndrome , Nicorandil , Male , Rats , Animals , Nicorandil/adverse effects , Citalopram/adverse effects , Antioxidants/therapeutic use , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacology , Long QT Syndrome/chemically induced , Long QT Syndrome/drug therapy , Oxidants , Adenosine Triphosphate/adverse effects
13.
BMC Geriatr ; 23(1): 344, 2023 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37264337

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence is limited regarding the optimal therapeutic approach for neuropsychiatric symptoms associated with Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely used for mood disorders and behavioral symptoms in older adults with cognitive impairment, but they have limited efficacy in patients with PDD. The effect of SSRIs on hemostasis is also unclear. This report describes a patient with PDD who developed deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and hyponatremia after initiating citalopram treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: An 86-year-old woman with PDD presented to our emergency department with altered mental status, generalized weakness, and left lower leg swelling. Citalopram was begun 4 weeks previously for behavioral changes and was discontinued 2 days before presentation because of excessive fatigue. At presentation, her plasma sodium level was 123 mg/dL. Brain computed tomography showed age-related changes. Doppler ultrasound revealed a DVT in the left lower leg. The patient was treated with hypertonic saline and intravenous heparin. After normalization of her sodium, she was discharged on donepezil and apixaban. At follow-up, her sodium remained normal, and her cognition and behavior were noticeably improved. CONCLUSION: Older adults with Parkinson's disease are sensitive to adverse effects of psychotropic agents, including SSRIs, which are not recommended first-line agents for behavioral symptoms in PDD. Upon initiating SSRIs in older patients with functional decline and multiple comorbidities, physicians need to evaluate the patient's risk factors for bleeding or thrombosis. Physical activities should also be maintained as much as possible.


Subject(s)
Dementia , Hyponatremia , Parkinson Disease , Venous Thrombosis , Female , Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Citalopram/adverse effects , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Dementia/drug therapy , Hyponatremia/chemically induced , Hyponatremia/drug therapy , Behavioral Symptoms , Sodium , Venous Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Venous Thrombosis/drug therapy , Venous Thrombosis/chemically induced
14.
Infant Behav Dev ; 72: 101849, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37390573

ABSTRACT

This longitudinal study examines the association between fetal Selective Serotonergic Reuptake Inhibitor antidepressant exposure and infant sleep behaviours at six and 12 months of age and focus on three of the most commonly prescribed antidepressants in pregnancy. This study utilises data on 698 women recruited at less than 20 weeks of pregnancy and are followed up at six and 12 months postpartum. Women were recruited into one of three groups: those taking either sertraline, citalopram or escitalopram antidepressants in pregnancy (n = 85); women with a depressive disorder who were not taking antidepressants (non-medicated depressed, NMD; n = 82); and, and a control group of women (n = 531). At six and 12 months, data were collected on breastfeeding and sleep location and infant sleep was measured using the Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire. Antidepressants sertraline, escitalopram and citalopram were not associated with increased infant waking or time awake. However, sertraline was associated with longer time for an infant to go to sleep. This study provides reassurance that SSRI antidepressants and, in particular, sertraline, escitalopram and citalopram are not associated with infant sleep behaviours that are commonly regarded as problematic including night waking. Further replication of these findings, including with direct measures of infant sleep, are recommended.


Subject(s)
Citalopram , Sertraline , Pregnancy , Female , Infant , Humans , Sertraline/adverse effects , Citalopram/adverse effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Escitalopram , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Sleep
15.
Transl Psychiatry ; 13(1): 149, 2023 05 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37147306

ABSTRACT

Studies assessing associations between prenatal exposure to antidepressants, maternal depression, and offspring DNA methylation (DNAm) have been inconsistent. Here, we investigated whether prenatal exposure to citalopram or escitalopram ((es)citalopram) and maternal depression is associated with differences in DNAm. Then, we examined if there is an interaction effect of (es)citalopram exposure and DNAm on offspring neurodevelopmental outcomes. Finally, we investigated whether DNAm at birth correlates with neurodevelopmental trajectories in childhood. We analyzed DNAm in cord blood from the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) biobank. MoBa contains questionnaire data on maternal (es)citalopram use and depression during pregnancy and information about child neurodevelopmental outcomes assessed by internationally recognized psychometric tests. In addition, we retrieved ADHD diagnoses from the Norwegian Patient Registry and information on pregnancies from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. In total, 958 newborn cord blood samples were divided into three groups: (1) prenatal (es)citalopram exposed (n = 306), (2) prenatal maternal depression exposed (n = 308), and (3) propensity score-selected controls (n = 344). Among children exposed to (es)citalopram, there were more ADHD diagnoses and symptoms and delayed communication and psychomotor development. We did not identify differential DNAm associated with (es)citalopram or depression, nor any interaction effects on neurodevelopmental outcomes throughout childhood. Trajectory modeling identified subgroups of children following similar developmental patterns. Some of these subgroups were enriched for children exposed to maternal depression, and some subgroups were associated with differences in DNAm at birth. Interestingly, several of the differentially methylated genes are involved in neuronal processes and development. These results suggest DNAm as a potential predictive molecular marker of later abnormal neurodevelopmental outcomes, but we cannot conclude whether DNAm links prenatal (es)citalopram exposure or maternal depression with child neurodevelopmental outcomes.


Subject(s)
DNA Methylation , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Child , Citalopram/adverse effects , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/genetics , Cohort Studies , Depression
16.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol ; 33(3): 91-100, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37074330

ABSTRACT

Objective: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in children and adolescents is associated with substantial morbidity and increases the risk of future psychopathology. However, relatively few psychopharmacologic studies have examined treatments for GAD in pediatric populations, especially in prepubertal youth. Methods: Children and adolescents aged 7-17 years of age with a primary diagnosis of GAD were treated with flexibly dosed escitalopram (10-20 mg daily, n = 138) or placebo (n = 137) for 8 weeks. Efficacy measures included the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) for GAD, Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) scale, Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS); safety measures included the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) as well as adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and electrocardiographic and laboratory monitoring. Results: Escitalopram was superior to placebo in reducing anxiety symptoms of GAD, as seen in the difference in mean change from baseline to week 8 on the PARS severity for GAD score (least squares mean difference = -1.42; p = 0.028). Functional improvement, as reflected by CGAS score, was numerically greater in escitalopram-treated patients compared with those receiving placebo (p = 0.286), and discontinuation owing to AEs did not differ between the two groups. Vital signs, weight, laboratory, and electrocardiographic results were consistent with previous pediatric studies of escitalopram. Conclusions: Escitalopram reduced anxiety symptoms and was well tolerated in pediatric patients with GAD. These findings confirm earlier reports of escitalopram efficacy in adolescents aged 12-17 years and extend the safety and tolerability data to children with GAD aged 7-11 years. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03924323.


Subject(s)
Citalopram , Escitalopram , Humans , Adolescent , Child , Citalopram/adverse effects , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Double-Blind Method , Nucleotidyltransferases/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
17.
Epilepsy Behav ; 140: 109102, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36745964

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To investigate the association between exposure to antidepressants (ADs) and the risk of epilepsy among patients exposed to ADs. METHOD: We conducted a case-control study using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database between 1998 and 2013. A total of 863 patients with epilepsy and 3,452 controls were included. The dose of ADs was categorized according to the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD). The risk of epilepsy was assessed using conditional logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Compared with cDDD < 90, ADs exposure with cDDD > 365 (odds ratio [OR]: 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.12-1.68) was associated with an increased risk of epilepsy, but not for those with cDDD 90-365 (OR: 1.07,95% CI: 0.87-1.30) after adjustment for several comorbidities and indications of ADs use. Other identified risk factors include cerebrovascular disease, traumatic brain injury, and central nervous system infection. Subgroup analysis of individual ADs showed that escitalopram (OR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.12-3.31), venlafaxine (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.13-2.31), mirtazapine (OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.00-2.43), paroxetine (OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.08-1.94), and fluoxetine (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.01-1.56) had a significantly higher risk of epilepsy. Sertraline, fluvoxamine, citalopram, duloxetine, milnacipran, and bupropion did not show any proconvulsant effects. CONCLUSIONS: The study found an increased risk of epilepsy among patients who were exposed to any ADs, particularly longer-term users. Given the nature of observational studies with residual bias, interpretation should be cautious.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors , Humans , Case-Control Studies , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Citalopram/adverse effects , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Epilepsy/chemically induced
18.
J Sex Med ; 20(2): 161-169, 2023 02 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36763929

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is closely associated with sexual dysfunction, which may worsen during treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) due to the side effects of pharmacologic treatment. AIM: To examine the association between sexual function and severity of MDD in drug-naïve patients as compared with healthy controls and how treatment with SSRIs affects sexual function over time in individuals with MDD. Interaction with gender and treatment response was examined. METHODS: In 92 patients with MDD, we measured MDD severity with 6- and 17-item versions of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS6 and HDRS17) and the level of sexual function with the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks after initiating treatment with escitalopram. Baseline sexual function was compared with the sexual function of 73 healthy controls. Linear regression models were used to assess differences in sexual function between healthy controls and patients and change in sexual function from baseline to week 12. Linear mixed models were used to assess differences in change in sexual function between treatment response groups. OUTCOMES: Outcomes included total scores on the HDRS6, HDRS17, and Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire and changes in total scores from baseline to week 12. RESULTS: Unmedicated patients with MDD reported impaired sexual function as compared with healthy controls. Level of sexual function was not associated with severity of MDD at baseline. Patients' sexual function improved significantly during treatment, which was coupled with amelioration of depressive symptoms. Treatment response groups (remitters, intermediate responders, nonresponders) did not predict change in sexual function. Gender had no effect on sexual dysfunction symptoms during treatment. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Major depression is a risk factor for sexual problems, and improvement in sexual function was coupled with amelioration of depressive symptoms. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Among its strengths, this was a naturalistic study reflecting real-world settings in clinical practice. It additionally included a baseline measurement of sexual function and MDD severity on drug-naïve patients prior to the initiation of treatment. Finally, the follow-up of 12 weeks extends beyond the acute phase of treatment in which previous research has observed a peak in sexual side effects. In terms of limitations, there was no placebo arm; thus, the study cannot attribute the effects on sexual function to treatment with antidepressants per se. Also, the patients were young, which may have served as a protective factor against sexual side effects. CONCLUSION: Sexual dysfunction was strongly associated with MDD and improved in parallel with overall symptoms of depression across a standard 12-week treatment with SSRI antidepressants. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02869035 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02869035).


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological , Humans , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Citalopram/therapeutic use , Citalopram/adverse effects , Depression , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Escitalopram , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/drug therapy , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/chemically induced
19.
Orthod Craniofac Res ; 26(3): 415-424, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36458927

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Antidepressants, specifically Selective Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitors (SSRIs), that alter serotonin metabolism are currently the most commonly prescribed drugs for the treatment of depression. There is some evidence to suggest these drugs contribute to birth defects. As jaw development is often altered in craniofacial birth defects, the purpose of this study was to interrogate the effects of in utero SSRI exposure in a preclinical model of mandible development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Wild-type C57BL6 mice were used to produce litters that were exposed in utero to an SSRI, Citalopram (500 µg/day). Murine mandibles from P15 pups were analysed for a change in shape and composition. RESULTS: Analysis indicated an overall shape change with total mandibular length and ramus height being shorter in exposed pups as compared to controls. Histomorphometric analysis revealed that first molar length was longer in exposed pups while third molar length was shorter in exposed as compared to control. Histological investigation of molars and surrounding periodontium revealed no change in collagen content of the molar in exposed pups, some alteration in collagen composition in the periodontium, increased alkaline phosphatase in molars and periodontium and decreased mesenchymal cell marker presence in exposed mandibles. CONCLUSION: The results of this study reveal SSRI exposure may interrupt mandible growth as well as overall dental maturation in a model of development giving insight into the expectation that children exposed to SSRIs may require orthodontic intervention.


Subject(s)
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors , Serotonin , Animals , Mice , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Serotonin/metabolism , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Citalopram/adverse effects , Mandible/metabolism
20.
J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry ; 64(2): 147-157, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36351521

ABSTRACT

We present a case of Torsades de Pointes (TdP) in a patient with COVID-19 infection and multiple TdP risk factors including QT-interval prolongation, hemodialysis, bradycardia, and treatment with remdesivir, citalopram, and quetiapine. The case was complicated by post-resuscitation anxiety superimposed on a history of medical trauma since childhood. Top experts in the field of consultation-liaison psychiatry, trauma informed care, and cardiac electrophysiology provide perspectives on this case with a review of the literature. Key teaching topics include identification of TdP risk factors in patients with a complex illness; the necessity for prompt electrophysiology consultation in clinical scenarios with high risk for TdP; and the approach to patients with medical trauma using a trauma-informed lens. We highlight the contributions of COVID-19, the pharmacokinetics of QT-interval-prolonging psychotropic medications, the risks of hemodialysis, and the role of remdesivir-induced bradycardia in this first reported case of TdP in a patient treated with remdesivir.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Long QT Syndrome , Torsades de Pointes , Humans , Child , Torsades de Pointes/chemically induced , Torsades de Pointes/drug therapy , Citalopram/adverse effects , Quetiapine Fumarate/adverse effects , Bradycardia/chemically induced , Bradycardia/drug therapy , Long QT Syndrome/chemically induced , Long QT Syndrome/drug therapy , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Renal Dialysis , DNA-Binding Proteins/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...