Evaluation of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin A/B rapid tests for Clostridioides (prev. Clostridium) difficile diagnosis in a university hospital in Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile is responsible for most cases of nosocomial diarrhea and, despite the high prevalence of the disease worldwide, the best laboratory diagnostic approach to diagnose C. difficile infection (CDI) is a subject of ongoing debate. Although the use of multiple tests is recommended, the cost of these algorithms commonly exceeds the affordability in some countries. Thus, to improve CDI diagnosis in a university hospital in Brazil, this study analyzed two immunochromatographic tests and one enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) to evaluate the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and A/B toxins of C. difficile. Stool samples of 89 adult patients presenting nosocomial diarrhea during hospitalization were included. The toxigenic culture was used as the reference method. GDH detection by both commercial tests showed high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (92.1%). On the other hand, toxin-based methods showed a sensitivity between 19.2 and 57.7%. In conclusion, the results suggest that rapid tests for GDH detection are not only suitable for CDI diagnosis as screening tests but also as a single method.

Immunochromatographic test and ELISA for the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and A/B toxins as an alternative for the diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile-associated diarrhea in foals and neonatal piglets.

Considering the lack of studies evaluating the performance of commercially available methods for diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI) in animals, the present study aimed to assess an immunochromatographic test for detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and A/B toxins of C. difficile, also evaluated by an ELISA kit, in foals and neonatal piglets. Intestinal contents of 47 piglets and feces of 35 foals were tested to GDH antigen and A/B toxins in a lateral flow method (Ecodiagnostica, Brazil). Also, these samples were submitted to A/B toxin detection by an ELISA kit (C. difficile Tox A/B II, Techlab Inc., USA), using the toxigenic culture (TC) as the reference method. The GDH component of the lateral flow test showed sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% and a high specificity in samples of piglets (82.61%) and foals (100%). Detection of A/B toxins using the lateral flow test and the ELISA resulted in a specificity of 100% in samples of both species. On the other hand, the sensibility ranged from 54.2 to 90% for the ELISA and from 12.5 to 60% for the lateral flow test for piglets' and foals' samples, respectively. In conclusion, the present work suggests that the lateral flow test for GDH detection could be a useful method for diagnosing CDI in these species. On the other hand, the low sensitivity of the lateral flow test for A/B toxins might compromise its utility in piglets.

Glutamato deshidrogenasa: Su valor diagnóstico en la diarrea por Clostridioides difficile / Glutamate dehydrogenase: Its diagnostic value in Clostridioides difficile diarrhea

Clostridioides difficile es el principal agente causal de diarreas asociadas al cuidado de la salud. Esta bacteria produce toxinas y una enzima que se encuentra muy conservada en la especie: la glutamato deshidrogenasa (GDH). El diagnóstico rápido y el tratamiento efectivo permiten la pronta mejoría del paciente, con el consecuente control de la diseminación del microorganismo. Sin embargo, aún no se cuenta con un método diagnóstico óptimo y se propone la realización de diversas pruebas, cuyos resultados se interpretan en el contexto de ciertos algoritmos. En este trabajo se evaluó el desempeño de la GDH como prueba de tamizaje en el diagnóstico de la diarrea por c. difficile. Se estudiaron 615 muestras de materia fecal. Se determinó la presencia de GDH y de toxinas mediante el equipo diagnóstico de enzimoinmunoensayo de membrana C. DIFF QUIK-CHEK COMPLETE® (TECHLAB) y se realizaron cultivos para la búsqueda de C. difficile. Se calcularon los valores de sensibilidad, especificidad, VPP y VPN con un nivel de significación p < 0,05. Se detectó GDH en 266 muestras (43,25%), con una sensibilidad del 100% y una especificidad del 87,10%, IC95: 84,58-91,42. Se hallaron toxinas en 218 muestras (35,45%) y C. difficile desarrolló en 235 cultivos (38,21%). De 48 muestras GDH positivas y sin producción de toxina/s, 17 fueron positivas al cultivo de C. difficile, con 15 aislamientos toxigénicos y 2 no toxigénicos. No hubo desarrollo de C. difficile en las 31 muestras restantes. Ninguna muestra GDH negativa dio resultado positivo de toxina/s ni desarrollo en el cultivo, por lo cual el VPN de la GDH fue del 100%, mientras que el VPP fue del 81,9%. Concluimos que la determinación de GDH representa un screening adecuado para descartar casos de diarrea por C. difficile, por lo tanto de valor en los algoritmos diagnósticos de las diarreas infecciosas.

Clostridioides difficile is the main etiological agent of diarrhea associated with health care, it produces toxins and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), an enzyme that is highly conserved in this species. Rapid diagnosis and effective treatment produce prompt improvement of the patient and subsequent control of the microorganism spread. There are several techniques whose results are interpreted in the context of algorithms. However, the optimal diagnostic method is yet unknown. The performance of GDH as a screening test for the diagnosis of C. difficile diarrhea was assessed. Six hundred and fifteen stool samples were studied. The presence of GDH and toxins presence was determined by TECHLAB® C. DIFF QUIK-CHEK COMPLETE and the samples were cultured for the search of C. difficile. The values of sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were calculated with a p value of 0.05 or less. GDH was detected in 266 samples (43.25%), with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 87.10%, IC95: 84.58-91.42; toxin/s were detected in 218 (35.45%) and C. difficile developed in 235 cultures (38.21%). From 48 samples with positive GDH and negative toxin/s, 15 toxigenic and 2 non-toxigenic isolates were obtained, the remaining 31 samples were negative for C. difficile. All GDH-negative samples were negative for toxins or culture, therefore, GDH NPV was 100%, while PPV was 81.9%. We conclude that GDH is a suitable screening test for the diagnostic algorithm of C. difficile diarrhea.

[Glutamate dehydrogenase. Its diagnostic value in Clostridioides difficile diarrhea]. / Glutamato deshidrogenasa. Su valor diagnóstico en la diarrea por Clostridioides difficile.

Clostridioides difficile is the main etiological agent of diarrhea associated with health care, it produces toxins and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), an enzyme that is highly conserved in this species. Rapid diagnosis and effective treatment produce prompt improvement of the patient and subsequent control of the microorganism spread. There are several techniques whose results are interpreted in the context of algorithms. However, the optimal diagnostic method is yet unknown. The performance of GDH as a screening test for the diagnosis of C. difficile diarrhea was assessed. Six hundred and fifteen stool samples were studied. The presence of GDH and toxins presence was determined by TECHLAB® C. DIFF QUIK-CHEK COMPLETE and the samples were cultured for the search of C. difficile. The values of sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were calculated with a p value of 0.05 or less. GDH was detected in 266 samples (43.25%), with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 87.10%, IC95: 84.58-91.42; toxin/s were detected in 218 (35.45%) and C. difficile developed in 235 cultures (38.21%). From 48 samples with positive GDH and negative toxin/s, 15 toxigenic and 2 non-toxigenic isolates were obtained, the remaining 31 samples were negative for C. difficile. All GDH-negative samples were negative for toxins or culture, therefore, GDH NPV was 100%, while PPV was 81.9%. We conclude that GDH is a suitable screening test for the diagnostic algorithm of C. difficile diarrhea.

Impact of simultaneous glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin A/B rapid immunoassay on Clostridium difficile diagnosis and treatment in hospitalized patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea in a university hospital of Brazil.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Clostridium difficile is a major cause of health care-associated infection, but disagreement between diagnostic tests is an ongoing barrier to clinical decision-making. Conventional enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for toxin detection is currently the most frequently used technique for C. difficile infection (CDI) diagnosis, but its low sensitivity makes the development of an alternative strategy necessary for improving the diagnosis in developing countries. METHODS: Between years 2011 and 2015, 154 stool samples from patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea were examined by toxigenic culture and EIA for the diagnosis of CDI. In the year 2015, when glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) test was first available in Brazil, 53 of those fecal specimens were also tested by the C. diff Quik Chek Complete rapid immunoassay. At this time, we prospectively assessed the impact of this test on CDI treatment rates before and after it was introduced in clinical practice. RESULTS: The GDH component of C. diff Quik Chek Complete test had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 95.1% compared with toxigenic culture, with 89.8% concordance. The Tox A/B II EIA and the toxin portion of C. diff Quik Chek Complete yielded sensitivities between values of 50-58.3%, with 100% specificities. The introduction of GDH test increased the number of treated patients with CDI from 57.7% to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Glutamate dehydrogenase test is a reliable method for the diagnosis of CDI and greatly increases the number of properly treated patients with CDI. Therefore, this exam should be considered the mainstay for the laboratory diagnosis of CDI in developing countries.

The Clostridium difficile exosporium cysteine (CdeC)-rich protein is required for exosporium morphogenesis and coat assembly.

Clostridium difficile is an important nosocomial pathogen that has become a major cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. There is a general consensus that C. difficile spores play an important role in C. difficile pathogenesis, contributing to infection, persistence, and transmission. Evidence has demonstrated that C. difficile spores have an outermost layer, termed the exosporium, that plays some role in adherence to intestinal epithelial cells. Recently, the protein encoded by CD1067 was shown to be present in trypsin-exosporium extracts of C. difficile 630 spores. In this study, we renamed the CD1067 protein Clostridium difficile exosporium cysteine-rich protein (CdeC) and characterized its role in the structure and properties of C. difficile spores. CdeC is expressed under sporulation conditions and localizes to the C. difficile spore. Through the construction of an ΔcdeC isogenic knockout mutant derivative of C. difficile strain R20291, we demonstrated that (i) the distinctive nap layer is largely missing in ΔcdeC spores; (ii) CdeC is localized in the exosporium-like layer and is accessible to IgGs; (iii) ΔcdeC spores were more sensitive to lysozyme, ethanol, and heat treatment than wild-type spores; and (iv) despite the almost complete absence of the exosporium layer, ΔcdeC spores adhered at higher levels than wild-type spores to intestinal epithelium cell lines (i.e., HT-29 and Caco-2 cells). Collectively, these results indicate that CdeC is essential for exosporium morphogenesis and the correct assembly of the spore coat of C. difficile.