Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 120
Filter
1.
Eur. j. psychol. appl. legal context (Internet) ; 11(2): 71-79, jul.-dic. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-183601

ABSTRACT

Priority given to investigating the onset and maintenance of criminal behavior in the past is currently giving way to a new focus on the process of criminal desistance. Early narratives of future desistance are the first step in this process and, although they do not assure withdrawal from crime, they are the beginning of the personal change that precedes a progressive desistance from criminal activity. This study analyzes early desistance narratives of offenders still in prison and whether these narratives differed depending on their personal, criminal, and social characteristics. Participants were 44 imprisoned male offenders, aged between 20 and 50 years old at different stages of their sentence and in three different prison regimes. They were interviewed using Cid and Martí's protocol and their accounts were accordingly coded in three categories: early narratives towards a non-criminal identity, perceived self-efficacy to desist from crime, and will to desist. The results show that participants' early desistance narratives vary depending on their personal, criminal, and social variables. Results on the periods of sentence completion and prison regimes are discussed in terms of how prisons could contribute to enhancing the narratives of desistance from crime


La prioridad otorgada en el pasado a la investigación sobre el inicio y mantenimiento de la conducta delictiva está dando paso actualmente al análisis del proceso de desistimiento delictivo. Las narrativas tempranas del desistimiento futuro son el primer paso en este proceso y, aunque no aseguran dicho desistimiento, son el comienzo del cambio personal que precede al abandono progresivo de la actividad delictiva. Este estudio analiza las narrativas tempranas de desistimiento de delincuentes aún en prisión y si estas narrativas difieren según sus características personales, delictivas y sociales. Los participantes fueron 44 varones encarcelados, con edades comprendidas entre los 20 y los 50 años, en diferentes fases de su sentencia y en tres grados penitenciarios distintos. Fueron entrevistados utilizando el protocolo de Cid y Martí y sus relatos fueron codificados en tres categorías: narrativas tempranas sobre una identidad no delictiva, autoeficacia percibida para desistir del delito y voluntad para desistir. Los resultados muestran que las narrativas tempranas de desistimiento de los participantes difieren según sus características personales, delictivas y sociales. Los resultados relativos a la fase de la sentencia y a los grados penitenciarios se discuten en términos de cómo las prisiones pueden contribuir a potenciar las narrativas de desistimiento delictivo


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Criminal Behavior , Criminals/psychology , Self Efficacy , Narrative Therapy/methods , Evaluation of the Efficacy-Effectiveness of Interventions , Criminal Psychology/methods
2.
PLoS One ; 14(10): e0224455, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31661520

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Psychopathy is a personality disorder characterised by two underlying factors. Factor 1 (affective and interpersonal deficits) captures affective deficits, whilst Factor 2 (antisocial and impulsive/disorganised behaviours) captures life course persistent antisocial behaviours. Impaired processing of threat has been proposed as an aetiologically salient factor in the development of psychopathy, but the relationship of this impairment to the factorial structure of the disorder in adult male offenders is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether threat processing deficits are characteristic of psychopathy as a unitary construct or whether such deficits are specifically linked to higher scores on individual factors. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of the literature was conducted by searching PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO. METHODS: Studies were included if they (1) reported physiological measures of threat response as the primary outcome measure (2) indexed psychopathy using a well-validated clinician rated instrument such as the PCL-R (3) investigated male offenders between 18 and 60 years of age (4) reported threat processing analyses using both Factor 1 and Factor 2 scores (5) provided sufficient data to calculate effect sizes and (6) were published in English-language peer-reviewed journals. We identified twelve studies with data on 1112 participants for the meta-analysis of the relationship with Factor 1 scores, and nine studies with data on 801 participants for the meta-analysis of the relationship with Factor 2 scores. We conducted the meta-analyses to calculate correlations using random-effects models. RESULTS: PCL-R/SV Factor 1 scores were significantly and negatively related to threat processing indices (r = -0.22, (95%CI [-0.28, -.017]). Neither PCL-R/SV Factor 2 scores (r = -0.005, 95%CI [-0.10, 0.09]), nor PCL-R total score (r = -0.05, (95%CI [-0.15, -0.04]) were related to threat processing indices. No significant heterogeneity was detected for the Factor score results. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analyses of the distinct psychopathy factors suggest that the threat processing deficits observed in male offenders with psychopathy are significantly associated with higher scores on Factor 1. A similar relationship does not exist with Factor 2 scores. Our findings highlight the importance of investigating the potentially discrete relationships between aetiological variables and the two factor constructs in the disorder.


Subject(s)
Criminals/psychology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Violence/psychology , Antisocial Personality Disorder/psychology , Criminal Psychology/methods , Humans , Impulsive Behavior , Male , Personality Disorders , Prisoners/psychology , Psychometrics/methods
3.
Eur. j. psychol. appl. legal context (Internet) ; 11(1): 1-7, ene.-jun. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-183537

ABSTRACT

Research findings suggest that sex offenders show worse performance than the general population in neuropsychological tests. Nevertheless, moderators such as age of the victim, use of antisocial control groups, and characteristics of administered measures have been highlighted. Here, 100 participants completed a battery of cognitive measures tapping fluid reasoning, verbal ability, and three basic executive processes (inhibition, switching, and updating). They were matched by educational level and classified in four groups: controls, non-sex offenders, rapists, and child abusers. The analyses revealed that rapists showed lower fluid reasoning scores than controls and child abusers. Furthermore, rapists and child abusers showed lower executive updating performance than controls and non-sex offenders. Importantly, child abusers did show fluid reasoning scores on a par with controls (controlling for updating differences), but their executive updating performance was equivalent to the one revealed by rapists (controlling for fluid intelligence differences). Implications of these findings for the design of efficient intervention programs are discussed


Los datos de investigación empírica sugieren que los delincuentes sexuales presentan un peor desempeño que la población general en las pruebas neuropsicológicas. Aun así, se ha resaltado la influencia de variables moderadoras como la edad de la víctima, el uso de grupos control que incluyan individuos antisociales y las características de las medidas utilizadas. En este estudio cien participantes completaron una batería de pruebas cognitivas que evalúan razonamiento fluido, capacidad verbal y tres funciones ejecutivas básicas (inhibición, cambio y actualización). Los participantes estaban igualados en su nivel educativo y divididos en cuatro grupos: controles, delincuentes no sexuales, agresores sexuales con víctimas adultas y abusadores de menores. Los análisis revelaron que los agresores sexuales con víctimas adultas presentaban puntuaciones menores que los controles y los abusadores de menores en razonamiento fluido. Más aún, los agresores con víctimas adultas y los abusadores tenían peor desempeño que los controles y los delincuentes no sexuales en actualización ejecutiva. Es destacable que los abusadores de menores mostraran puntuaciones en razonamiento fluido equiparables a las de los controles (controlando estadísticamente las diferencias en actualización), pero su desempeño en actualización ejecutiva fue equivalente al mostrado por los agresores con víctimas adultas (controlando estadísticamente las diferencias en inteligencia fluida). Finalmente se discuten las implicaciones de estos resultados para el diseño de programas de intervención efectivos


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Rape/psychology , Sex Offenses/psychology , Child Abuse, Sexual/psychology , Executive Function , Criminal Psychology/methods , Criminals/psychology , Criminal Behavior , Neuropsychological Tests/statistics & numerical data , Case-Control Studies
4.
BMJ Open ; 9(3): e024351, 2019 03 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30898809

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the evidence for the use of psychological and psychosocial interventions offered to forensic mental health inpatients. DESIGN: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ScienceDirect and Web of Science databases were searched for research published in English between 1 January 1990 and 31 May 2018. OUTCOME MEASURES: Disturbance, mental well-being, quality of life, recovery, violence/risk, satisfaction, seclusion, symptoms, therapeutic relationship and ward environment. There were no limits on the length of follow-up. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trial (RCT) studies of any psychological or psychosocial intervention in an inpatient forensic setting. Pilot or feasibility studies were included if an RCT design was used.We restricted our search criteria to inpatients in low, medium and high secure units aged over 18. We focused on interventions considered applicable to most patients residing in forensic mental health settings. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. RESULTS: 17 232 citations were identified with 195 full manuscripts examined in detail. Nine papers were included in the review. The heterogeneity of the identified studies meant that meta-analysis was inappropriate. The results were presented in table form together with a narrative synthesis. Only 7 out of 91 comparisons revealed statistically significant results with no consistent significant findings. The most frequently reported outcomes were violence/risk and symptoms. 61% of the violence/risk comparisons and 79% of the symptom comparisons reported improvements in the intervention groups compared with the control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Current practice is based on limited evidence with no consistent significant findings. This review suggests psychoeducational and psychosocial interventions did not reduce violence/risk, but there is tentative support they may improve symptoms. More RCTs are required with: larger sample sizes, representative populations, standardised outcomes and control group interventions similar in treatment intensity to the intervention. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017067099.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Personality Disorders/therapy , Violence/psychology , Criminal Psychology/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Personality Disorders/psychology , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome , Violence/prevention & control
5.
Law Hum Behav ; 43(1): 45-55, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30762416

ABSTRACT

In partnership with a small city police department, we randomly informed or did not inform 122 crime suspects that their interrogations were being video-recorded. Coding of all sessions indicated that camera-informed suspects spoke as often and as much as did those who were not informed; they were as likely to waive Miranda at the outset and later; they were as likely to make admissions and confessions, not just denials; and they were perceived no differently by detectives on a range of dimensions. Looking at distal outcomes, we observed no differences in ultimate case dispositions. In terms of policy and practice, results did not support the hypothesis that recording-even when transparent, as required in 2-party consent states-inhibits suspects or alters case dispositions. At least for now, this conclusion is empirically limited to situations in which cameras are concealed and to interrogations that do not involve juveniles, homicides, or drug crimes, which we a priori excluded from our sample. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
Criminals/psychology , Informed Consent/psychology , Truth Disclosure , Video Recording , Criminal Psychology/methods , Forensic Psychology/methods , Humans , Interviews as Topic , New England , Police , United States
6.
Assessment ; 26(7): 1347-1361, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28412837

ABSTRACT

Risk assessment instruments are increasingly used in mental health jail diversion programs. This study examined the reliability and validity of Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START) and Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) assessments overall and by client race. Research assistants completed START and LSI-R assessments for 95 diversion clients. Arrests and jail days were collected via official records and self-report 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months after baseline. Assessments demonstrated good interrater reliability and convergent validity. START strength total scores and LSI-R risk estimates were the strongest predictors of recidivism. Total scores and risk estimates did not differ as a function of client race, but there were some differences in accuracy of START vulnerability and LSI-R total scores and risk estimates in predicting jail days (but not arrests), over shorter follow-ups. No such differences were found for START strength total scores across any follow-up period or recidivism measure.


Subject(s)
Criminal Psychology/methods , Prisoners/psychology , Recidivism/psychology , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/standards , Adult , Criminals/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , United States
7.
Behav Sci Law ; 36(5): 597-609, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30298573

ABSTRACT

Several legal interventions under the police power and parens patriae functions of the state depend partially on judgments that an individual is dangerous. Psychological research regarding risk assessment can provide relevant evidence regarding the appropriate application of these interventions. Developing, interpreting, and presenting relevant research regarding risk assessment in a manner that enhances the ability of courts to make accurate determinations of dangerousness requires clarification of the risk presented by this individual and explanation of how this person generates this risk. Testimony regarding such research can enhance the ability of the courts to make accurate judgments regarding the relationship between the risk presented and the justification for the specific intervention at issue. This article examines the justificatory functions of judgments of dangerousness for various police power and parens patriae interventions in order to clarify the manner in which psychological research and testimony can contribute to the ability of the courts to accurately assess the risk presented by an individual in making a judgment of dangerousness for a specific form of legal intervention.


Subject(s)
Criminal Psychology , Criminals/psychology , Dangerous Behavior , Decision Making , Risk Assessment/methods , Commitment of Mentally Ill , Criminal Psychology/legislation & jurisprudence , Criminal Psychology/methods , Expert Testimony , Humans , Judgment , Mental Disorders/psychology , Police/psychology , Supreme Court Decisions , United States
8.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law ; 46(1): 93-101, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29618541

ABSTRACT

Tattoos have held different meanings throughout history, with particular significance in cultural, social, and clinical contexts. Psychiatrists have long been interested in understanding the relevance of the tattooed body in a clinical or forensic evaluation and in settling on interpretive models that hold reliable value. Some studies have indicated that tattoos may be associated with markers of high-risk behaviors, mental illness diagnosis, and personality disorders. We attempt to provide an updated and comprehensive guide for forensic evaluators, so they can incorporate the observation of tattoos into their assessments with a review of the scientific literature that supports the interpretations and places them in context. The association between tattoos and risk, mental health, or behavioral implications is not as clear or linear as one might initially imagine, and mental health professionals should have a sophisticated understanding of the practice.


Subject(s)
Criminal Psychology/methods , Forensic Psychiatry/methods , Tattooing , Expert Testimony/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Health , Self Concept
9.
Eur. j. psychol. appl. legal context (Internet) ; 9(1): 41-49, ene. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-159348

ABSTRACT

Most Spanish prisons provide specialised treatment for incarcerated sex offenders, both rapists and child molesters. This treatment is a cognitive-behavioural intervention that has shown relative effectiveness in previous research. With regard to offenders’ rehabilitation, recidivism assessments are necessary as a final measure of treatment effectiveness. However, the evaluation of recidivism by itself does not provide sufficient information on the treatment process and the specific effects that treated subjects could undergo. This paper aims to analyse the therapeutic effectiveness of psychological treatment provided to rapists (in general, males sentenced for committing a sexual offence against women). To this aim, a group of treated rapists (N=153) serving a sentence in prison was analysed. Using a specially designed scale (PASSO), the global therapeutic change and ten specific variables (including assertiveness, readiness to change, cognitive distortions, impulsivity, etc.) were assessed. The within-subjects comparison showed that treated sex offenders improved, in therapeutic terms, globally as well as in most of the specific variables assessed (improvements not experimented by the control group). Also, different therapeutic subscales showed relevant associations between them. The findings regarding treatment effectiveness are discussed (AU)


La mayoría de los centros penitenciarios españoles ofrecen un programa de tratamiento psicológico especializado para agresores sexuales, tanto para violadores como para abusadores de menores. Se trata de un programa de orientación cognitivo-conductual, que en algunas evaluaciones ya realizadas ha evidenciado una eficacia terapéutica relativa en términos de reducción de las tasas de reincidencia. Aunque la evaluación de la reincidencia delictiva sea una medida necesaria para ponderar la eficacia final del tratamiento de los agresores sexuales, dicha medida no permite conocer con precisión las mejoras específicas que los sujetos pueden experimentar. Este artículo dirige su atención precisamente a evaluar con detalle la eficacia terapéutica del tratamiento de los agresores sexuales de mujeres adultas. Con esta finalidad, se analiza una muestra de agresores sexuales tratados (N=153) que cumplen condena en prisión por un delito contra una mujer adulta. Para ello se evalúa mediante una escala diseñada al efecto (EPAS) el cambio terapéutico global de los sujetos tras el tratamiento y también su evolución en diez variables terapéuticas específicas (como asertividad, disposición al cambio personal, distorsiones cognitivas, etc.). La comparación intra-sujetos indicó que los agresores tratados mejoran, en términos terapéuticos, tanto globalmente como en la mayoría de las variables específicas evaluadas (mejoras que no se produjeron en el grupo control). Así mismo, se encontraron asociaciones significativas relevantes entre diversas variables terapéuticas. Finalmente, se comentan críticamente los resultados obtenidos y algunos de los retos existentes en el campo de la evaluación del tratamiento psicológico de los agresores sexuales (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Aggression/psychology , Sex Offenses , Person-Centered Psychotherapy/methods , Psychotherapy/instrumentation , Psychotherapy/organization & administration , Rape/psychology , Criminal Psychology/methods , Treatment Outcome , Evaluation of the Efficacy-Effectiveness of Interventions , Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale/statistics & numerical data , Criminal Behavior/physiology , Data Analysis
10.
Int J Law Psychiatry ; 49(Pt A): 55-65, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27340115

ABSTRACT

The use and development of the investigative tool colloquially known as criminal profiling has steadily increased over the past five decades throughout the world. Coupled with this growth has been a diversification in the suggested range of applications for this technique. Possibly the most notable of these has been the attempted transition of the technique from a tool intended to assist police investigations into a form of expert witness evidence admissible in legal proceedings. Whilst case law in various jurisdictions has considered with mutual disinclination the evidentiary admissibility of criminal profiling, a disjunction has evolved between these judicial examinations and the scientifically vetted research testing the accuracy (i.e., validity) of the technique. This article offers an analysis of the research directly testing the validity of the criminal profiling technique and the extant legal principles considering its evidentiary admissibility. This analysis reveals that research findings concerning the validity of criminal profiling are surprisingly compatible with the extant legal principles. The overall conclusion is that a discrete form of crime behavioural analysis is supported by the profiler validity research and could be regarded as potentially admissible expert witness evidence. Finally, a number of theoretical connections are also identified concerning the skills and qualifications of individuals who may feasibly provide such expert testimony.


Subject(s)
Criminal Psychology/methods , Criminals/psychology , Expert Testimony , Behavioral Research , Crime/legislation & jurisprudence , Crime/psychology , Criminal Psychology/standards , Criminals/legislation & jurisprudence , Expert Testimony/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , United States
11.
Psicothema (Oviedo) ; 28(2): 194-200, mayo 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-151678

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Attempts to predict prison recidivism based on the personality have not been very successful. This study aims to provide data on recidivism prediction based on the scores on a personality questionnaire. For this purpose, a predictive model combining the actuarial procedure with a posteriori probability was developed, consisting of the probabilistic calculation of the effective verification of the event once it has already occurred. METHOD: Cuestionario de Personalidad Situacional (CPS; Fernández, Seisdedos, & Mielgo, 1998) was applied to 978 male inmates classified as recidivists or non-recidivists. RESULTS: High predictive power was achieved, with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85 (p <.001; Se = 0.012; 95% CI [0.826, 0.873]. The answers to the CPS items made it possible to properly discriminate 77.3% of the participants. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate the important role of the personality as a key factor in understanding delinquency and predicting recidivism


ANTECEDENTES: los intentos para predecir la reincidencia penitenciaria basándose en la personalidad no han tenido mucho éxito. Este trabajo tiene como objetivo ofrecer datos sobre la predicción de la reincidencia a partir de las puntuaciones en un cuestionario de personalidad. MÉTODO: se aplicó el Cuestionario de Personalidad Situacional (CPS; Fernández, Seisdedos y Mielgo, 1998) a 978 reclusos varones clasificados como reincidentes o no reincidentes y se elaboró un modelo predictivo combinando el procedimiento actuarial con el concepto de probabilidad a posteriori, consistente en realizar cálculo probabilístico a partir de la constatación efectiva del suceso una vez ya se ha producido. RESULTADOS: se logró un elevado poder predictivo, siendo el área bajo la curva (AUC) de 0.85 (p < 0.001; Se = 0.012; 95% IC [0.826, 0.873]. Las respuestas a los ítems del CPS permitieron discriminar adecuadamente al 77,3% de los participantes. CONCLUSIONES: estos datos indican el papel importante de la personalidad como factor clave para entender la delincuencia y predecir la reincidencia


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Juvenile Delinquency/prevention & control , Juvenile Delinquency/psychology , Prisoners/psychology , Personality/physiology , Criminals/psychology , Criminal Behavior/physiology , Prisons/methods , Prisons , Criminal Psychology/instrumentation , Criminal Psychology/methods , Criminal Psychology/trends , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Psychometrics/methods , Spain
12.
Behav Sci Law ; 34(2-3): 295-307, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27021306

ABSTRACT

In Foucha v. Louisiana (1992), the United States Supreme Court ruled that individuals adjudicated not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) could not remain in a forensic hospital if they were no longer mentally ill and dangerous. Since this decision, a variety of important questions have arisen related to the insanity defense and what should happen to insanity acquittees post-adjudication. This article provides an analysis of clinical issues confronting forensic examiners when psychosis as a result of substance abuse is the underlying condition supporting an insanity defense. To accomplish this analysis, this article provides the reader with a review of literature showing the complex relationship between psychosis and substance abuse. Second, this article investigates how substance-induced psychosis may impact both insanity opinions and subsequent conditional release decisions. Third, the article aims to provide research-driven information to assist clinicians in conducting conditional release evaluations. Finally, this paper provides a model for evaluating dangerousness in the context of conditional release evaluations. Given the substantial comorbidity between substance abuse and psychosis, it is critical for researchers and clinicians to consider potential effects of substance abuse when evaluating insanity acquittees for conditional release, especially as substance use relates to future dangerousness. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Subject(s)
Behavioral Sciences/legislation & jurisprudence , Insanity Defense , Mentally Ill Persons/legislation & jurisprudence , Mentally Ill Persons/psychology , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Criminal Psychology/methods , Dangerous Behavior , Forensic Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Forensic Psychiatry/methods , Hospitals, Psychiatric/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Risk Factors , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis
13.
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-146772

ABSTRACT

Despite the intoxication of many eyewitnesses at crime scenes, only four published studies to date have investigated the effects of alcohol intoxication on eyewitness identification performance. While one found intoxication significantly increased false identification rates from target absent showups, three found no such effect using the more traditional lineup procedure. The present study sought to further explore the effects of alcohol intoxication on identification performance and examine whether accurate decisions from intoxicated witnesses could be postdicted by confidence and response times. One hundred and twenty participants engaged in a study examining the effects of intoxication (control, placebo, and mild intoxication) and target presence on identification performance. Participants viewed a simultaneous lineup one week after watching a mock crime video of a man attempting to steal cars. Ethanol intoxication (0.6 ml/kg) was found to make no significant difference to identification accuracy and such identifications from intoxicated individuals were made no less confidently or slowly than those from sober witnesses. These results are discussed with respect to the previous research examining intoxicated witness identification accuracy and the misconceptions the criminal justice system holds about the accuracy of such witnesses (AU)


A pesar de la existencia de intoxicación etílica en muchos testigos oculares de escenas de crimen, hasta la fecha solo hay cuatro estudios publicados que investigan sus efectos en la intervención de los testigos oculares durante la identificación. Solo uno de ellos halló que la intoxicación aumentaba de modo significativo la proporción de identificaciones falsas a partir de presentaciones en ausencia del objetivo y los otros tres no hallaron dicho efecto utilizando el clásico procedimiento de ruedas de reconocimiento. Este estudio ha intentado ampliar la exploración de los efectos de la intoxicación etílica en la actuación en identificaciones y analizar si se podrían conjeturar decisiones precisas por parte de testigos presenciales intoxicados a partir de la confianza y de los tiempos de respuesta. En el estudio para analizar los efectos de la intoxicación participaron 120 personas (control, placebo e intoxicación leve), con presencia del objetivo en la tarea de identificación. Los participantes vieron una rueda de reconocimiento simultánea una semana después, presenciando un video que simulaba un delito cometido por un hombre que intentaba robar coches. Se encontró que la intoxicación etílica (0.6 ml/kg) no suponía diferencia significativa alguna en la precisión de la identificación, además de que tales identificaciones de personas intoxicadas no se llevaban a cabo de un modo menos fiable o lento que las de testigos sobrios. Se comentan los resultados en relación a investigaciones previas, analizando la precisión de la identificación de testigos intoxicados y las falsas creencias que el sistema de justicia penal mantiene acerca de la precisión de tales testigos (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Criminal Psychology/methods , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Pattern Recognition, Visual , Criminals/statistics & numerical data , Recognition, Psychology , Reaction Time , Reproducibility of Results
14.
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-146774

ABSTRACT

Research suggests that those suspected of sexual offending might be more willing to reveal information about their crimes if interviewers display empathic behaviour. However, the literature concerning investigative empathy is in its infancy, and so as yet is not well understood. This study explores empathy in a sample of real-life interviews conducted by police officers in England with suspected sex offenders. Using qualitative methodology, the presence and type of empathic verbal behaviours displayed was examined. Resulting categories were quantitatively analysed to investigate their occurrence overall, and across interviewer gender. We identified four distinct types of empathy, some of which were used significantly more often than others. Female interviewers displayed more empathic behaviour per se by a considerable margin (AU)


La investigación indica que las personas sospechosas de agresión sexual podrían estar más dispuestas a revelar información sobre sus delitos si los entrevistadores muestran un comportamiento empático. No obstante, los estudios sobre la empatía en la investigación están aún en mantillas, por lo que aún no se entiende bien. Este estudio explora la empatía en una muestra de entrevistas en la vida real realizadas por agentes de policía en Inglaterra con presuntos delincuentes sexuales. Se analizó mediante metodología cualitativa la presencia y el tipo de comportamientos verbales empáticos mostrados. Las categorías obtenidas se analizaron cuantitativamente con el fin de investigar su aparición global y en función del sexo del entrevistador. Se identificaron cuatro tipos diferentes de empatía, algunos de ellos utilizados con más frecuencia que otros. Las entrevistadoras mostraron mayor comportamiento empático per se por un margen considerable (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Sex Offenses/psychology , Empathy , Criminal Psychology/methods , Interview, Psychological/methods , Domestic Violence/psychology , Criminals/psychology
15.
Sex Abuse ; 28(5): 427-47, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24996579

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the current study was to examine whether the MOLEST and RAPE scales and change on these measures predicted sexual recidivism in a sample of 146 adult male sexual offenders who participated in a high-intensity treatment program while incarcerated. The majority of subjects had functional scores on the MOLEST and RAPE scales prior to treatment. Of those who had dysfunctional pre-treatment scores, the majority made significant gains. However, the MOLEST and RAPE scales did not significantly predict sexual recidivism. This was the case for pre-treatment scores, post-treatment scores, and change scores. Our findings are generally not consistent with the view that these measures assess dynamic risk factors for sexual recidivism. However, this is the first published study to examine the predictive validity of these scales and more rigorous research is needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.


Subject(s)
Prisoners/psychology , Psychological Tests/standards , Risk Assessment/standards , Sex Offenses/prevention & control , Adult , Criminal Psychology/methods , Dangerous Behavior , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Rape/prevention & control , Recurrence , Reproducibility of Results
16.
Sex Abuse ; 28(5): 448-68, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25079778

ABSTRACT

Child sexual abuse is associated with social anxiety, low self-esteem, and intimacy deficits. This, in combination with the core belief of a dangerous world, might suggest that child abusers are sexually attracted to submissiveness. The Implicit Association Test (IAT) was used to examine this hypothesis. Results indicated that child abusers have a stronger sexual preference for submissiveness than rapists, although there were no differences between child abusers and non-sexual offenders. Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that submissive-sexy associations have incremental value over child-sex associations in differentiating child abusers from other offenders. The predictive value of both implicit associations was explored by correlating IAT scores with measures for recidivism risk, aggression, and interpersonal anxiety. Child abusers with stronger child-sex associations reported higher levels of interpersonal anxiety and hostility. More research on implicit cognition in sex offenders is required for a better understanding of what these and similar implicit measures are exactly measuring and what role implicit cognition may play in sexual offending.


Subject(s)
Child Abuse, Sexual/psychology , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Criminal Psychology/methods , Pedophilia/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Child , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Pedophilia/psychology , Psychometrics , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Word Association Tests
17.
Adicciones (Palma de Mallorca) ; 28(1): 48-56, 2016. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-150408

ABSTRACT

Hay una estrecha relación entre el uso de alcohol/drogas y la delincuencia, pero esta relación es compleja. El consumo de drogas no conduce inexorablemente a conductas delictivas, como robos, asaltos o violaciones, ni siquiera entre las personas que las consumen regularmente o que han desarrollado una adicción. Sin embargo, hay algunas personas en que el exceso de alcohol/drogas está relacionado directamente con la delincuencia. Son muchos los factores que pueden dar cuenta de este fenómeno: pobreza, trastornos de personalidad, factores culturales y sociales, amigos consumidores o contacto con la prisión. Estos aspectos sirven para comprender el riesgo de delincuencia y de drogodependencia. La mayoría de los adictos son responsables penalmente de las conductas delictivas cometidas relacionadas con la adicción, pero la adicción puede en algunos casos socavar la libertad de la persona para controlar su conducta. Se analiza en este artículo el Código Penal español, reformado por la Ley Orgánica 1/2015, y la jurisprudencia existente sobre este tema, especialmente en relación con las circunstancias eximentes y atenuantes de la responsabilidad penal en los supuestos de adicción. Los informes forenses desempeñan un papel muy importante en los tribunales para ayudar al juez a tomar la decisión adecuada entre las distintas alternativas existentes


There is a strong link between drug use and crime, but this relationship is complex. Drug use does not necessarily lead to an increase in crimes, such as theft, rape or assault, even among regular users or addicts. However, in cases of individuals who consume drugs excessively and commit crimes, both factors are linked. Poverty, personality disorders, social and cultural variables, relationships with other users and previous incarceration or drug use are all factors. These issues play an important role in understanding the risk of crime and drug use. Most addicts should be held liable for most criminal behaviour motivated by addiction, but that addiction can, in some cases, affect one’s capacity for self-control over one’s actions. This paper examines the current response of the Spanish Criminal Justice System to various aspects of drug abuse, focusing on court decisions related with the nature and enforcement of drug laws. It also addresses aspects of criminal responsibility for drug abuse and drug-related crimes and suggests legislation on drugs, sentencing alternatives for drug offenses, and drug treatment options. Expert evidence plays a crucial role in this area in the court


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Drug Users/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Users/psychology , Juvenile Delinquency/legislation & jurisprudence , Juvenile Delinquency/psychology , Juvenile Delinquency/rehabilitation , Criminal Liability , Forensic Sciences , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Alcohol Drinking , Criminal Psychology/instrumentation , Criminal Psychology/methods , Personality Disorders , Comorbidity
18.
Perspect Biol Med ; 58(1): 120-37, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26657686

ABSTRACT

Since the 19th century, we have come to think of disease in terms of specific entities--entities defined and legitimated in terms of characteristic somatic mechanisms. Since the last third of that century, we have expanded would-be disease categories to include an ever-broader variety of emotional pain, idiosyncrasy, and culturally unsettling behaviors. Psychiatry has been the residuary legatee of these developments, developments that have always been contested at the ever-shifting boundary between disease and deviance, feeling and symptom, the random and the determined, the stigmatized and the value-free. Even in our era of reductionist hopes, psychopharmaceutical practice, and corporate strategies, the legitimacy of many putative disease categories will remain contested. The use of the specific disease entity model will always be a reductionist means to achieve necessarily holistic ends, both in terms of cultural norms and the needs of suffering individuals. Bureaucratic rigidities and stakeholder conflicts structure and intensify such boundary conflicts, as do the interests and activism of an interested lay public.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/history , Criminal Psychology/methods , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Homosexuality/psychology , Humans , Substance-Related Disorders
19.
Int J Law Psychiatry ; 42-43: 1-10, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26329983

ABSTRACT

This article examines a false start in the application of psychology to the law. While there had been expert testimony from physicians in criminal and civil cases in America since the nineteenth century, forensic psychology first emerged in the early twentieth century. Following European traditions of experimental psychology, Hugo Münsterberg applied the nascent science of memory research to the assessment of witness credibility. A brilliant and popular Harvard professor, Münsterberg touted his technique of word-association to determine truth. Forensic psychology's development was stalled by resistance from within legal authorities, including John Henry Wigmore, the leading expert on evidence. However, Münsterberg was a sensation in popular media. In this article, the authors examine early attempts to import experimental psychology into the courtroom and the arguments against them. Not only were Münsterberg's findings premature, they touched on a forbidden domain for witnesses: fact finding. While sincere, he learned that the determination of truth lay within the province of juries and judges, not psychologists. Thus, the application of psychology to the law was delayed. The authors review the lessons from Münsterberg's false start and comment on developments in the admissibility of scientific testimony.


Subject(s)
Criminal Law/history , Criminal Law/methods , Criminal Psychology/history , Criminal Psychology/methods , Criminal Law/legislation & jurisprudence , Criminal Psychology/legislation & jurisprudence , Criminals/psychology , Expert Testimony/legislation & jurisprudence , Germany , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Humans , Massachusetts , Psychological Theory , Universities , Word Association Tests/history
20.
Int J Law Psychiatry ; 42-43: 177-82, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26409570

ABSTRACT

Neuropsychologists are frequently asked to serve as expert witnesses in an increasing number of legal contexts for civil and criminal proceedings. The skills required to practice forensic neuropsychology expand upon the knowledge, skills, and abilities developed by clinical neuropsychologists. Forensic neuropsychologists acquire expertise in understanding the roles and various functions of the legal system, as well as their role in addressing psycholegal questions to assist fact finders in making legal decisions. The required skills and the unique circumstances for clinical neuropsychologists pursing forensic work are reviewed.


Subject(s)
Criminal Psychology/methods , Expert Testimony , Judicial Role , Neuropsychology/methods , Decision Making , Humans , Informed Consent , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/psychology , Neuropsychological Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...