Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 93
Filter
1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(33)2021 08 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34385313

ABSTRACT

The frequency and distribution of meiotic crossovers are tightly controlled; however, variation in this process can be observed both within and between species. Using crosses of two natural Arabidopsis thaliana accessions, Col and Ler, we mapped a crossover modifier locus to semidominant polymorphisms in SUPPRESSOR OF NPR1-1 INDUCIBLE 1 (SNI1), which encodes a component of the SMC5/6 complex. The sni1 mutant exhibits a modified pattern of recombination across the genome with crossovers elevated in chromosome distal regions but reduced in pericentromeres. Mutations in SNI1 result in reduced crossover interference and can partially restore the fertility of a Class I crossover pathway mutant, which suggests that the protein affects noninterfering crossover repair. Therefore, we tested genetic interactions between SNI1 and both RECQ4 and FANCM DNA helicases, which showed that additional Class II crossovers observed in the sni1 mutant are FANCM independent. Furthermore, genetic analysis of other SMC5/6 mutants confirms the observations of crossover redistribution made for SNI1 The study reveals the importance of the SMC5/6 complex in ensuring the proper progress of meiotic recombination in plants.


Subject(s)
Arabidopsis Proteins/metabolism , Arabidopsis/metabolism , Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , DNA Helicases/metabolism , Genetic Variation , Meiosis/physiology , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Arabidopsis/genetics , Arabidopsis Proteins/genetics , DNA Helicases/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Plant , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Protein Domains
2.
PLoS Genet ; 17(7): e1009663, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34252074

ABSTRACT

Homologous recombination is a high-fidelity repair pathway for DNA double-strand breaks employed during both mitotic and meiotic cell divisions. Such repair can lead to genetic exchange, originating from crossover (CO) generation. In mitosis, COs are suppressed to prevent sister chromatid exchange. Here, the BTR complex, consisting of the Bloom helicase (HIM-6 in worms), topoisomerase 3 (TOP-3), and the RMI1 (RMH-1 and RMH-2) and RMI2 scaffolding proteins, is essential for dismantling joint DNA molecules to form non-crossovers (NCOs) via decatenation. In contrast, in meiosis COs are essential for accurate chromosome segregation and the BTR complex plays distinct roles in CO and NCO generation at different steps in meiotic recombination. RMI2 stabilizes the RMI1 scaffolding protein, and lack of RMI2 in mitosis leads to elevated sister chromatid exchange, as observed upon RMI1 knockdown. However, much less is known about the involvement of RMI2 in meiotic recombination. So far, RMI2 homologs have been found in vertebrates and plants, but not in lower organisms such as Drosophila, yeast, or worms. We report the identification of the Caenorhabditis elegans functional homolog of RMI2, which we named RMIF-2. The protein shows a dynamic localization pattern to recombination foci during meiotic prophase I and concentration into recombination foci is mutually dependent on other BTR complex proteins. Comparative analysis of the rmif-2 and rmh-1 phenotypes revealed numerous commonalities, including in regulating CO formation and directing COs toward chromosome arms. Surprisingly, the prevalence of heterologous recombination was several fold lower in the rmif-2 mutant, suggesting that RMIF-2 may be dispensable or less strictly required for some BTR complex-mediated activities during meiosis.


Subject(s)
Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Meiosis/genetics , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , Chromosome Segregation/genetics , Chromosomes/metabolism , Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , DNA Repair/genetics , DNA Topoisomerases, Type I/genetics , DNA Topoisomerases, Type I/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Homologous Recombination/genetics , Meiosis/physiology , Sister Chromatid Exchange/genetics
3.
Prenat Diagn ; 41(5): 584-590, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33484483

ABSTRACT

The physical exchange of DNA between homologs, crossing-over, is essential to orchestrate the unique, reductional first meiotic division (MI). In females, the events of meiotic recombination that serve to tether homologs and facilitate their disjunction at MI occur during fetal development, preceding the MI division by several decades in our species. Data from studies in humans and mice demonstrate that placement of recombination sites during fetal development influences the likelihood of an MI nondisjunction event that results in the production of an aneuploid egg. Here we briefly summarize what we know about the relationship between aneuploidy and meiotic recombination and important considerations for the future of human assisted reproduction.


Subject(s)
Aneuploidy , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Meiosis/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , Humans , Meiosis/physiology
4.
Mol Cell ; 78(6): 1252-1263.e3, 2020 06 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32362315

ABSTRACT

Crossover recombination is critical for meiotic chromosome segregation, but how mammalian crossing over is accomplished is poorly understood. Here, we illuminate how strands exchange during meiotic recombination in male mice by analyzing patterns of heteroduplex DNA in recombinant molecules preserved by the mismatch correction deficiency of Msh2-/- mutants. Surprisingly, MSH2-dependent recombination suppression was not evident. However, a substantial fraction of crossover products retained heteroduplex DNA, and some provided evidence of MSH2-independent correction. Biased crossover resolution was observed, consistent with asymmetry between DNA ends in earlier intermediates. Many crossover products yielded no heteroduplex DNA, suggesting dismantling by D-loop migration. Unlike the complexity of crossovers in yeast, these simple modifications of the original double-strand break repair model-asymmetry in recombination intermediates and D-loop migration-may be sufficient to explain most meiotic crossing over in mice while also addressing long-standing questions related to Holliday junction resolution.


Subject(s)
Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , Homologous Recombination/physiology , Meiosis/physiology , Animals , Chromosome Segregation/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , DNA Repair/genetics , DNA, Cruciform/genetics , DNA, Cruciform/metabolism , Homologous Recombination/genetics , Male , Meiosis/genetics , Mice , Mice, Inbred DBA , MutS Homolog 2 Protein/genetics , MutS Homolog 2 Protein/metabolism , Nucleic Acid Heteroduplexes/genetics
5.
Development ; 147(6)2020 03 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32094118

ABSTRACT

The most significant feature of meiosis is the recombination process during prophase I. CXXC finger protein 1 (CXXC1) binds to CpG islands and mediates the deposition of H3K4me3 by the SETD1 complex. CXXC1 is also predicted to recruit H3K4me3-marked regions to the chromosome axis for the generation of double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the prophase of meiosis. Therefore, we deleted Cxxc1 before the onset of meiosis with Stra8-Cre The conditional knockout mice were completely sterile with spermatogenesis arrested at MII. Knockout of Cxxc1 led to a decrease in the H3K4me3 level from the pachytene to the MII stage and caused transcriptional disorder. Many spermatogenesis pathway genes were expressed early leading to abnormal acrosome formation in arrested MII cells. In meiotic prophase, deletion of Cxxc1 caused delayed DSB repair and improper crossover formation in cells at the pachytene stage, and more than half of the diplotene cells exhibited precocious homologous chromosome segregation in both male and female meiosis. Cxxc1 deletion also led to a significant decrease of H3K4me3 enrichment at DMC1-binding sites, which might compromise DSB generation. Taken together, our results show that CXXC1 is essential for proper meiotic crossover formation in mice and suggest that CXXC1-mediated H3K4me3 plays an essential role in meiotic prophase of spermatogenesis and oogenesis.


Subject(s)
Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase/metabolism , Histones/metabolism , Meiosis/physiology , Trans-Activators/physiology , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Embryo, Mammalian , Female , Male , Meiosis/genetics , Methylation , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Knockout , Oogenesis/genetics , Protein Processing, Post-Translational/genetics , Spermatogenesis/genetics , Trans-Activators/genetics
6.
Plant J ; 101(2): 473-483, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31536659

ABSTRACT

Meiotic crossovers facilitate chromosome segregation and create new combinations of alleles in gametes. Crossover frequency varies along chromosomes and crossover interference limits the coincidence of closely spaced crossovers. Crossovers can be measured by observing the inheritance of linked transgenes expressing different colors of fluorescent protein in Arabidopsis pollen tetrads. Here we establish DeepTetrad, a deep learning-based image recognition package for pollen tetrad analysis that enables high-throughput measurements of crossover frequency and interference in individual plants. DeepTetrad will accelerate the genetic dissection of mechanisms that control meiotic recombination.


Subject(s)
Arabidopsis/genetics , Deep Learning , Meiosis , Alleles , Arabidopsis Proteins/genetics , Arabidopsis Proteins/metabolism , Chromosome Segregation , Chromosomes, Plant , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , Homologous Recombination , Pollen/genetics , Transgenes
7.
Mol Cell ; 75(4): 859-874.e4, 2019 08 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31351878

ABSTRACT

Homologous recombination (HR) is essential for high-fidelity DNA repair during mitotic proliferation and meiosis. Yet, context-specific modifications must tailor the recombination machinery to avoid (mitosis) or enforce (meiosis) the formation of reciprocal exchanges-crossovers-between recombining chromosomes. To obtain molecular insight into how crossover control is achieved, we affinity purified 7 DNA-processing enzymes that channel HR intermediates into crossovers or noncrossovers from vegetative cells or cells undergoing meiosis. Using mass spectrometry, we provide a global characterization of their composition and reveal mitosis- and meiosis-specific modules in the interaction networks. Functional analyses of meiosis-specific interactors of MutLγ-Exo1 identified Rtk1, Caf120, and Chd1 as regulators of crossing-over. Chd1, which transiently associates with Exo1 at the prophase-to-metaphase I transition, enables the formation of MutLγ-dependent crossovers through its conserved ability to bind and displace nucleosomes. Thus, rewiring of the HR network, coupled to chromatin remodeling, promotes context-specific control of the recombination outcome.


Subject(s)
Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , Meiosis/physiology , Mitosis/physiology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Mass Spectrometry , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics
8.
Cell ; 177(2): 326-338.e16, 2019 04 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30879787

ABSTRACT

Crossing over is a nearly universal feature of sexual reproduction. Here, analysis of crossover numbers on a per-chromosome and per-nucleus basis reveals a fundamental, evolutionarily conserved feature of meiosis: within individual nuclei, crossover frequencies covary across different chromosomes. This effect results from per-nucleus covariation of chromosome axis lengths. Crossovers can promote evolutionary adaptation. However, the benefit of creating favorable new allelic combinations must outweigh the cost of disrupting existing favorable combinations. Covariation concomitantly increases the frequencies of gametes with especially high, or especially low, numbers of crossovers, and thus might concomitantly enhance the benefits of crossing over while reducing its costs. A four-locus population genetic model suggests that such an effect can pertain in situations where the environment fluctuates: hyper-crossover gametes are advantageous when the environment changes while hypo-crossover gametes are advantageous in periods of environmental stasis. These findings reveal a new feature of the basic meiotic program and suggest a possible adaptive advantage.


Subject(s)
Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , Animals , Cell Nucleus , Chromosome Segregation , Chromosomes/genetics , Chromosomes/physiology , Computer Simulation , Female , Genetics, Population/methods , Homologous Recombination/genetics , Humans , Solanum lycopersicum/genetics , Male , Meiosis/genetics , Recombination, Genetic/genetics , Synaptonemal Complex
9.
Nat Commun ; 10(1): 785, 2019 02 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30770831

ABSTRACT

Meiotic crossover (CO) plays a key role in producing gametophytes and generating genetic variation. The patterns of CO production differ inter- and intra-species, as well as between sexes. However, sex-specific patterns of CO production have not been accurately profiled independently of genetic backgrounds in maize. Here, we develop a method to isolate single female gametophyte for genomes sequencing in maize. We show that more COs are observed in male (19.3 per microspore) than in female (12.4 per embryo sac). Based on Beam-Film model, the more designated class I and II COs are identified in male than in female. In addition, CO maturation inefficiency (CMI) is detected in some genetic backgrounds, suggesting that maize may be an ideal model for dissecting CMI. This research provides insights toward understanding the molecular mechanism of CO production between sexes and may help to improve maize breeding efficiency through paternal selection.


Subject(s)
Germ Cells, Plant/metabolism , Zea mays/genetics , Zea mays/physiology , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , Germ Cells, Plant/physiology , Meiosis/genetics , Meiosis/physiology , Ovule/genetics , Ovule/metabolism
10.
PLoS Genet ; 14(10): e1007776, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30379819

ABSTRACT

Correct segregation of meiotic chromosomes depends on DNA crossovers (COs) between homologs that culminate into visible physical linkages called chiasmata. COs emerge from a larger population of joint molecules (JM), the remainder of which are repaired as noncrossovers (NCOs) to restore genomic integrity. We present evidence that the RNF212-like C. elegans protein ZHP-4 cooperates with its paralog ZHP-3 to enforce crossover formation at distinct steps during meiotic prophase: in the formation of early JMs and in transition of late CO intermediates into chiasmata. ZHP-3/4 localize to the synaptonemal complex (SC) co-dependently followed by their restriction to sites of designated COs. RING domain mutants revealed a critical function for ZHP-4 in localization of both proteins to the SC and for CO formation. While recombination initiates in zhp-4 mutants, they fail to appropriately acquire pro-crossover factors at abundant early JMs, indicating a function for ZHP-4 in an early step of the CO/NCO decision. At late pachytene stages, hypomorphic mutants exhibit significant levels of crossing over that are accompanied by defects in localization of pro-crossover RMH-1, MSH-5 and COSA-1 to designated crossover sites, and by the appearance of bivalents defective in chromosome remodelling required for segregation. These results reveal a ZHP-4 function at designated CO sites where it is required to stabilize pro-crossover factors at the late crossover intermediate, which in turn are required for the transition to a chiasma that is required for bivalent remodelling. Our study reveals an essential requirement for ZHP-4 in negotiating both the formation of COs and their ability to transition to structures capable of directing accurate chromosome segregation. We propose that ZHP-4 acts in concert with ZHP-3 to propel interhomolog JMs along the crossover pathway by stabilizing pro-CO factors that associate with early and late intermediates, thereby protecting designated crossovers as they transition into the chiasmata required for disjunction.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Segregation/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolism , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/genetics , Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/genetics , Chromosome Structures/metabolism , Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Meiosis , Synaptonemal Complex/metabolism
11.
Mol Biol Cell ; 28(6): 825-833, 2017 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28100637

ABSTRACT

When programmed meiotic DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) undergo recombinational repair, genetic crossovers (COs) may be formed. A certain level of this is required for the faithful segregation of chromosomes, but the majority of DSBs are processed toward a safer alternative, namely noncrossovers (NCOs), via nonreciprocal DNA exchange. At the crossroads between these two DSB fates is the Msh4-Msh5 (MutSγ) complex, which stabilizes CO-destined recombination intermediates and members of the Zip3/RNF212 family of RING finger proteins, which in turn stabilize MutSγ. These proteins function in the context of the synaptonemal complex (SC) and mainly act on SC-dependent COs. Here we show that in the SC-less ciliate Tetrahymena, Zhp3 (a protein distantly related to Zip3/RNF212), together with MutSγ, is responsible for the majority of COs. This activity of Zhp3 suggests an evolutionarily conserved SC-independent strategy for balancing CO:NCO ratios. Moreover, we report a novel meiosis-specific protein, Sa15, as an interacting partner of Zhp3. Sa15 forms linear structures in meiotic prophase nuclei to which Zhp3 localizes. Sa15 is required for a wild-type level of CO formation. Its linear organization suggests the existence of an underlying chromosomal axis that serves as a scaffold for Zhp3 and other recombination proteins.


Subject(s)
Synaptonemal Complex/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , DNA Repair/physiology , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Meiosis/physiology , RING Finger Domains , Recombination, Genetic/physiology , Tetrahymena/metabolism
12.
Science ; 355(6323): 403-407, 2017 01 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28059716

ABSTRACT

Meiosis produces haploid gametes through a succession of chromosomal events, including pairing, synapsis, and recombination. Mechanisms that orchestrate these events remain poorly understood. We found that the SUMO (small ubiquitin-like modifier)-modification and ubiquitin-proteasome systems regulate the major events of meiotic prophase in mouse. Interdependent localization of SUMO, ubiquitin, and proteasomes along chromosome axes was mediated largely by RNF212 and HEI10, two E3 ligases that are also essential for crossover recombination. RNF212-dependent SUMO conjugation effected a checkpointlike process that stalls recombination by rendering the turnover of a subset of recombination factors dependent on HEI10-mediated ubiquitylation. We propose that SUMO conjugation establishes a precondition for designating crossover sites via selective protein stabilization. Thus, meiotic chromosome axes are hubs for regulated proteolysis via SUMO-dependent control of the ubiquitin-proteasome system.


Subject(s)
Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , Ligases/metabolism , Meiosis/physiology , Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex/metabolism , Small Ubiquitin-Related Modifier Proteins/metabolism , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases/metabolism , Animals , Cell Cycle Proteins , Chromosome Pairing , Chromosomes, Mammalian/metabolism , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Ligases/genetics , Male , Meiosis/genetics , Mice , Mice, Mutant Strains , Proteolysis , Spermatocytes/cytology , Spermatocytes/metabolism , Ubiquitin/metabolism , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases/genetics , Ubiquitination
13.
Curr Opin Plant Biol ; 30: 82-7, 2016 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26939088

ABSTRACT

Homologous recombination affects genome evolution through crossover, gene conversion and point mutations. Whole genome sequencing together with a detailed epigenome analysis have shed new light on our understanding of how meiotic recombination shapes plant genes and genome structure. Crossover events are associated with DNA sequence motifs, together with an open chromatin signature (hypomethylated CpGs, low nucleosome occupancy or specific histone modifications). The crossover landscape may differ between male and female meiocytes and between species. At the gene level, crossovers occur preferentially in promoter regions in Arabidopsis. In recent years, there is rising support suggesting that biased mismatch repair during meiotic recombination may increase GC content genome-wide and may be responsible for the GC content gradient found in many plant genes.


Subject(s)
Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Meiosis/genetics , Recombination, Genetic/genetics , Chromatin/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , DNA, Plant/genetics , Epigenesis, Genetic/genetics , Genome, Plant , Meiosis/physiology , Recombination, Genetic/physiology
14.
Cell Cycle ; 14(4): 516-25, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25565522

ABSTRACT

During meiotic prophase, DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair-mediated homologous recombination (HR) occurs for exchange of genetic information between homologous chromosomes. Unlike autosomes or female sex chromosomes, human male sex chromosomes X and Y share little homology. Although DSBs are generated throughout male sex chromosomes, homologous recombination does not occur for most regions and DSB repair process is significantly prolonged. As a result, male sex chromosomes are coated with many DNA damage response proteins and form a unique chromatin structure known as the XY body. Interestingly, associated with the prolonged DSB repair, transcription is repressed in the XY body but not in autosomes, a phenomenon known as meiotic sex chromosome inactivation (MSCI), which is critical for male meiosis. Here using mice as model organisms, we briefly summarize recent progress on DSB repair in meiotic prophase and focus on the mechanism and function of DNA damage response in the XY body.


Subject(s)
Carrier Proteins/metabolism , Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , DNA Repair/physiology , Prophase/physiology , Sex Chromosomes/physiology , Animals , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , Male , Mice , Models, Biological , Sex Chromosomes/pathology , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases
15.
Nat Genet ; 46(2): 194-9, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24390283

ABSTRACT

Crossover recombination facilitates the accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis. In mammals, poorly characterized regulatory processes ensure that every pair of chromosomes obtains at least one crossover, even though most recombination sites yield non-crossovers. Designation of crossovers involves selective localization of the SUMO ligase RNF212 to a minority of recombination sites, where it stabilizes pertinent factors such as MutSγ (ref. 4). Here we show that the ubiquitin ligase HEI10 (also called CCNB1IP1) is essential for this crossover/non-crossover differentiation process. In HEI10-deficient mice, RNF212 localizes to most recombination sites, and dissociation of both RNF212 and MutSγ from chromosomes is blocked. Consequently, recombination is impeded, and crossing over fails. In wild-type mice, HEI10 accumulates at designated crossover sites, suggesting that it also has a late role in implementing crossing over. As with RNF212, dosage sensitivity for HEI10 indicates that it is a limiting factor for crossing over. We suggest that SUMO and ubiquitin have antagonistic roles during meiotic recombination that are balanced to effect differential stabilization of recombination factors at crossover and non-crossover sites.


Subject(s)
Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Ligases/antagonists & inhibitors , Meiosis/genetics , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases/antagonists & inhibitors , Animals , Cell Cycle Proteins , Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel , In Situ Nick-End Labeling , Indoles , Ligases/metabolism , Male , Meiosis/physiology , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , SUMO-1 Protein/metabolism , Spermatocytes/cytology , Spermatocytes/physiology , Statistics, Nonparametric , Synaptonemal Complex/metabolism , Ubiquitin/metabolism , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases/metabolism
16.
Proc Biol Sci ; 280(1771): 20131945, 2013 Nov 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24068360

ABSTRACT

Recombination allows faithful chromosomal segregation during meiosis and contributes to the production of new heritable allelic variants that are essential for the maintenance of genetic diversity. Therefore, an appreciation of how this variation is created and maintained is of critical importance to our understanding of biodiversity and evolutionary change. Here, we analysed the recombination features from species representing the major eutherian taxonomic groups Afrotheria, Rodentia, Primates and Carnivora to better understand the dynamics of mammalian recombination. Our results suggest a phylogenetic component in recombination rates (RRs), which appears to be directional, strongly punctuated and subject to selection. Species that diversified earlier in the evolutionary tree have lower RRs than those from more derived phylogenetic branches. Furthermore, chromosome-specific recombination maps in distantly related taxa show that crossover interference is especially weak in the species with highest RRs detected thus far, the tiger. This is the first example of a mammalian species exhibiting such low levels of crossover interference, highlighting the uniqueness of this species and its relevance for the study of the mechanisms controlling crossover formation, distribution and resolution.


Subject(s)
Biological Evolution , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Genetic Variation , Mammals/genetics , Phylogeny , Recombination, Genetic/genetics , Animals , Basal Metabolism , Bayes Theorem , Body Size , Body Temperature , Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Humans , Likelihood Functions , Male , Models, Genetic , Species Specificity , Testis/metabolism
17.
J Exp Bot ; 64(8): 2139-54, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23554258

ABSTRACT

In barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), chiasmata (the physical sites of genetic crossovers) are skewed towards the distal ends of chromosomes, effectively consigning a large proportion of genes to recombination coldspots. This has the effect of limiting potential genetic variability, and of reducing the efficiency of map-based cloning and breeding approaches for this crop. Shifting the sites of recombination to more proximal chromosome regions by forward and reverse genetic means may be profitable in terms of realizing the genetic potential of the species, but is predicated upon a better understanding of the mechanisms governing the sites of these events, and upon the ability to recognize real changes in recombination patterns. The barley MutL Homologue (HvMLH3), a marker for class I interfering crossovers, has been isolated and a specific antibody has been raised. Immunolocalization of HvMLH3 along with the synaptonemal complex transverse filament protein ZYP1, used in conjunction with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) tagging of specific barley chromosomes, has enabled access to the physical recombination landscape of the barley cultivars Morex and Bowman. Consistent distal localization of HvMLH3 foci throughout the genome, and similar patterns of HvMLH3 foci within bivalents 2H and 3H have been observed. A difference in total numbers of HvMLH3 foci between these two cultivars has been quantified, which is interpreted as representing genotypic variation in class I crossover frequency. Discrepancies between the frequencies of HvMLH3 foci and crossover frequencies derived from linkage analysis point to the existence of at least two crossover pathways in barley. It is also shown that interference of HvMLH3 foci is relatively weak compared with other plant species.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Plant/genetics , Hordeum/genetics , Pachytene Stage/genetics , Arabidopsis/genetics , Base Sequence , Chromosome Mapping , Chromosomes, Plant/physiology , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , Genetic Linkage/genetics , Genetic Linkage/physiology , Genetic Loci/genetics , Genetic Loci/physiology , Genome, Plant/genetics , Genome, Plant/physiology , Hordeum/physiology , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Molecular Sequence Data , Pachytene Stage/physiology , Phylogeny , Sequence Alignment , Synaptonemal Complex/genetics , Synaptonemal Complex/physiology
18.
G3 (Bethesda) ; 3(1): 9-22, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23316435

ABSTRACT

Crossing over between homologous chromosomes occurs during the prophase of meiosis I and is critical for chromosome segregation. In baker's yeast, two heterodimeric complexes, Msh4-Msh5 and Mlh1-Mlh3, act in meiosis to promote interference-dependent crossing over. Mlh1-Mlh3 also plays a role in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) by interacting with Msh2-Msh3 to repair insertion and deletion mutations. Mlh3 contains an ATP-binding domain that is highly conserved among MLH proteins. To explore roles for Mlh3 in meiosis and MMR, we performed a structure-function analysis of eight mlh3 ATPase mutants. In contrast to previous work, our data suggest that ATP hydrolysis by both Mlh1 and Mlh3 is important for both meiotic and MMR functions. In meiotic assays, these mutants showed a roughly linear relationship between spore viability and genetic map distance. To further understand the relationship between crossing over and meiotic viability, we analyzed crossing over on four chromosomes of varying lengths in mlh3Δ mms4Δ strains and observed strong decreases (6- to 17-fold) in crossing over in all intervals. Curiously, mlh3Δ mms4Δ double mutants displayed spore viability levels that were greater than observed in mms4Δ strains that show modest defects in crossing over. The viability in double mutants also appeared greater than would be expected for strains that show such severe defects in crossing over. Together, these observations provide insights for how Mlh1-Mlh3 acts in crossover resolution and MMR and for how chromosome segregation in Meiosis I can occur in the absence of crossing over.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Fungal/genetics , Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , DNA Mismatch Repair/physiology , Meiosis/physiology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Spores, Fungal/physiology , Adenosine Triphosphate/metabolism , Chromosome Mapping , Crossing Over, Genetic/genetics , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics , Flap Endonucleases/genetics , Hydrolysis , MutL Proteins , Mutation/genetics , Plasmids/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/physiology , Spores, Fungal/genetics
19.
PLoS One ; 7(6): e38476, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22701650

ABSTRACT

The analysis of crossover interference in many creatures is complicated by the presence of two kinds of crossovers, interfering and noninterfering. In such creatures, the values of the traditional indicators of interference are subject not only to the strength of interference but also to the relative frequencies of crossing over contributed by the two kinds. We formalize the relationship among these variables and illustrate the possibilities and limitations of classical interference analysis with meiotic tetrad data from wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae and from mlh1 and ndj1 mutants.


Subject(s)
Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , Meiosis/physiology , Models, Biological , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Membrane Proteins/genetics , MutL Protein Homolog 1 , Mutation/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/physiology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics
20.
Mol Cell ; 46(1): 43-53, 2012 Apr 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22500736

ABSTRACT

The BLM helicase has been shown to maintain genome stability by preventing accumulation of aberrant recombination intermediates. We show here that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae BLM ortholog, Sgs1, plays an integral role in normal meiotic recombination, beyond its documented activity limiting aberrant recombination intermediates. In wild-type meiosis, temporally and mechanistically distinct pathways produce crossover and noncrossover recombinants. Crossovers form late in meiosis I prophase, by polo kinase-triggered resolution of Holliday junction (HJ) intermediates. Noncrossovers form earlier, via processes that do not involve stable HJ intermediates. In contrast, sgs1 mutants abolish early noncrossover formation. Instead, both noncrossovers and crossovers form by late HJ intermediate resolution, using an alternate pathway requiring the overlapping activities of Mus81-Mms4, Yen1, and Slx1-Slx4, nucleases with minor roles in wild-type meiosis. We conclude that Sgs1 is a primary regulator of recombination pathway choice during meiosis and suggest a similar function in the mitotic cell cycle.


Subject(s)
Crossing Over, Genetic/physiology , DNA, Cruciform/metabolism , DNA, Fungal/metabolism , Meiotic Prophase I/physiology , RecQ Helicases/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/enzymology , DNA, Cruciform/genetics , DNA, Fungal/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Endodeoxyribonucleases/genetics , Endodeoxyribonucleases/metabolism , Endonucleases/genetics , Endonucleases/metabolism , Flap Endonucleases/genetics , Flap Endonucleases/metabolism , Holliday Junction Resolvases/genetics , Holliday Junction Resolvases/metabolism , Mutation , RecQ Helicases/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL