Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 77
Filter
2.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 27(1): 160-165, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30926368

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether incorporation of operative hysteroscopy with biopsy of products of conception, in conjunction with a suction curettage for a first trimester missed abortion, affected the rate of maternal cell contamination when chromosomal analysis was performed on the products of conception, and to determine the rates of retained products of conception with incorporation of hysteroscopy after suction curettage. DESIGN: Retrospective chart study. SETTING: Private, minimally invasive surgery and infertility practice with academic-community hospital affiliation. PATIENTS: Infertility patients undergoing evacuation of products of conception for documented first trimester miscarriages between 2006 and 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Suction curettage or hysteroscopic biopsy and suction curettage, followed by chromosomal analysis of products of conception for determination of fetal genetics. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: A total of 264 charts were analyzed. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on surgical collection of products of conception: group 1 (N = 174), suction curettage only, and group 2 (N = 90), a single procedure consisting of operative hysteroscopy with biopsy of products of conception followed by suction curettage and then diagnostic hysteroscopy to look for retained products. Data for chromosome detection and retained products of conception were available for 246 and 239 patients, respectively. No significant differences were detected between the groups for age, body mass index, ethnicity, gravida, parity, primary infertility, secondary infertility, spontaneous conception, single or multiple gestation, and surgical complications. Fetal chromosome detection was significantly higher without maternal contamination in group 2 (88.5%) compared with group 1 (64.8%) (p < .001). There was no significant between-group difference in postoperative retained products of conception. CONCLUSION: Obtaining fetal genetics can be useful when planning for a future successful pregnancy. The addition of operative hysteroscopy to biopsy the gestational sac, chorionic villi, and/or fetus significantly decreases the risk of maternal contamination and increases the ability to detect fetal chromosomes for genetic analysis without an increased risk of surgical complications. Despite the low risk of surgical complications, immediate second-look hysteroscopy after the completion of suction evacuation does not reduce the risk of postoperative retained products of conception.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous/surgery , Chromosomes , Cytogenetic Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Fetus/pathology , Genetic Testing/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Diagnosis , Vacuum Curettage/statistics & numerical data , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Abortion, Spontaneous/genetics , Abortion, Spontaneous/pathology , Adult , Biopsy, Needle , Chromosome Aberrations/statistics & numerical data , Chromosomes/chemistry , Chromosomes/genetics , Cytogenetic Analysis/trends , Female , Fetus/metabolism , Genetic Testing/trends , Humans , Hysteroscopy/methods , Hysteroscopy/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First/genetics , Prenatal Care , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Prenatal Diagnosis/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Diagnosis/trends , Retrospective Studies
3.
Biol Reprod ; 101(6): 1083-1090, 2019 12 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30721942

ABSTRACT

We review here the evolution in the field of embryo aneuploidy testing over the last 20 years, from the analysis of a subset of chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridisation to the transition toward a more comprehensive analysis of all 24 chromosomes. This current comprehensive aneuploidy testing most commonly employs next-generation sequencing (NGS). We present our experience in over 130 000 embryo biopsies using this technology. The incidence of aneuploidy was lower in trophectoderm biopsies compared to cleavage-stage biopsies. We also confirmed by NGS that embryo aneuploidy rates increased with increasing maternal age, mostly attributable to an increase in complex aneuploid embryos. In contrast, the number of MII oocytes retrieved or the use of oocyte vitrification did not affect aneuploidy rates. Similarly, neither maternal age, oocyte number, nor oocyte vitrification affected the incidence of mosaicism. Analysis of clinical outcomes, indications, and potential benefits of embryo aneuploidy testing revealed advanced maternal age as the most favored group, with some evidence of improved delivery rate per transfer as well as decreased miscarriage rates and time to pregnancy. Other indications are: recurrent miscarriage, repetitive implantation failure, severe male factor, previous trisomic pregnancy, and good prognosis patients mainly undergoing single embryo transfer, with the latter indication used to reduce the occurrence of multiple pregnancies without compromising cycle outcome. In conclusion, NGS has become the most appropriate technology for aneuploidy testing in trophectoderm biopsies, with accurate results, high throughput, and cost efficiency. This technology can be also applied to the analysis of the embryonic cell free DNA released to the culture media at blastocyst stage. This is a promising approach towards a non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing of aneuploidy.


Subject(s)
Aneuploidy , Cytogenetic Analysis/methods , Genetic Testing/methods , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Preimplantation Diagnosis/methods , Blastocyst/chemistry , Blastocyst/cytology , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/analysis , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/genetics , Cytogenetic Analysis/trends , Embryo Transfer , Female , Genetic Testing/trends , Humans , Male , Mosaicism , Noninvasive Prenatal Testing/methods , Noninvasive Prenatal Testing/trends , Precision Medicine , Pregnancy , Preimplantation Diagnosis/trends , Risk Factors , Time Factors
4.
BMC Cancer ; 18(1): 1245, 2018 Dec 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30541488

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) will relapse if treatment is withdrawn, but various trials have recently demonstrated that a significant proportion of patients who achieved a stable and deep molecular response (DMR) can stop therapy without relapsing. However, most information on treatment cessation was obtained from clinical trials with strict recruiting criteria. METHODS: We evaluated the outcome of 25 patients with CML that discontinued TKI therapy in our institute in real-world clinical practice. RESULTS: Of the 25 patients, 76% discontinued therapy in sustained deep molecular response (SDMR) and 24% were in unsustained DMR (UDMR). Discontinuation of therapy due to adverse effects was observed in 5 and 50% of the patients in the SDMR and UDMR groups, respectively. After TKI discontinuation, patients were followed for a median of 24 months. At the time of this analysis, 56% patients had a molecular relapse after a median of 4 months. SDMR and longer treatment duration were associated with lower probability of molecular relapse: 25% in SDMR patients with TKI treatment > 96 months and 85% in UDMR patients with TKI treatment ≤96 months. All relapsed patients promptly resumed TKI therapy and regained at least major molecular response (MMR). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that TKI discontinuation is safe outside clinical trials and particularly effective in CML patients who are in SDMR with longer TKI treatment duration.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Withholding Treatment/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cytogenetic Analysis/trends , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/genetics , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Rev Pneumol Clin ; 74(5): 327-338, 2018 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30343945

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in France, with about 30,000 deaths per year. The overwhelming majority (90 %) are tobacco-related. The prognosis is dark but great therapeutic advances have been made with the development of targeted therapies first and then immunotherapy afterwards. These medications are conditioned to the expression of biomarkers that require specific tools in routine to measure them. We will detail in this chapter several techniques of anatomopathology, cytogenetics and molecular biology necessary for the detection of biomarkers in lung cancers, and their applications in thoracic oncology in 2018.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnosis , Cytogenetic Analysis/methods , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/metabolism , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Chromatin Immunoprecipitation/methods , Cytogenetic Analysis/trends , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Translocation, Genetic
9.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 74(5): 568-587, 2016 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27707672

ABSTRACT

Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and lymphoproliferative disorders include a high number of heterogeneous entities, described in the 2008 WHO classification. This classification reflects the crucial role of a multidisciplinary approach which integrates cytogenetic results both for the notion of clonality and for differential diagnosis between these entities. The prognostic impact of some cytogenetic abnormalities or genome complexity is also confirmed for many of these entities. Novel provisional entities have been described, such as BCLU (B-cell lymphoma unclassifiable with features intermediate between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma) for which karyotype is critical to distinguish BCLU from Burkitt's lymphoma. The karyotype can be established from any tumour or liquid infiltrated by lymphoma cells. Recent adaptations of technics for cellular cultures according to the subtype of known (or suspected) lymphoma have significantly improved the percentage of informative karyotypes. Conventional karyotypes remain the best technical approach recommended for most of these subtypes. Interphase and/or metaphase FISH also represents a solid and rapid approach, because of the significant number of recurrent (sometimes specific) rearrangements of these entities. Next generation sequencing technologies contribute to enrich genomic data and substantially improve the understanding of oncogenic mechanisms underlying these lymphoid malignancies. Some molecular biomarkers are already part of the diagnostic process (for example, somatic mutation of MYD88 in Waldenström disease) thus reinforcing the essential principle of a multidisciplinary approach for the diagnosis of all the mature lymphoid malignancies.


Subject(s)
Cytogenetic Analysis/standards , Lymphoma/therapy , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/therapy , Adult , Child , Cytogenetic Analysis/methods , Cytogenetic Analysis/trends , France , Hematology/organization & administration , Hematology/standards , Hematology/trends , Humans , Lymphoma/diagnosis , Lymphoma/genetics , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/diagnosis , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/genetics , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/standards
10.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 74(5): 547-560, 2016 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27707671

ABSTRACT

Cytogenetic analyses (karyotype and, if necessary, appropriate complementary FISH analyses) are mandatory at diagnosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) as their results are taken into account in therapeutic protocols due to their diagnostic and prognostic values. In some cases, karyotype can be completed by other techniques (RT-PCR, RQ-PCR, DNA content, SNP-array, MLPA…) that can be equally or more informative than FISH. Here, we have tempted to establish guidelines concerning karyotype and FISH analyses according to the most recent data of the litterature which is reviewed here, completing the 2008 WHO classification with the recent new cytogenomic entities such as Ph-like ALL and indicating possible therapeutic implications.


Subject(s)
Cytogenetic Analysis/standards , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/therapy , Adult , Child , Cytogenetic Analysis/methods , Cytogenetic Analysis/trends , Hematology/organization & administration , Hematology/standards , Hematology/trends , Humans , Karyotyping/standards , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/diagnosis , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/genetics , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/standards
11.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 140(12): 1331-1337, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27588333

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: - In the burgeoning era of molecular genomics, immunoperoxidase (IPOX) testing grows increasingly relevant as an efficient and effective molecular screening tool. Patients with lung carcinoma may especially benefit from the use of IPOX because most lung carcinomas are inoperable at diagnosis and only diagnosed by small tissue biopsy or fine-needle sampling. When such small specimens are at times inadequate for molecular testing, positive IPOX results still provide actionable information. OBJECTIVE: - To describe the benefits and pitfalls of IPOX in the detection of biomarkers in lung carcinoma cytology specimens and small biopsies by summarizing the currently available commercial antibodies, preanalytic variables, and analytic considerations. DATA SOURCES: - PubMed. CONCLUSIONS: - Commercial antibodies exist for IPOX detection of aberrant protein expression due to EGFR L858R mutation, EGFR E746_A750 deletion, ALK rearrangement, ROS1 rearrangement, and BRAF V600E mutation, as well as PD-L1 expression in tumor cells. Automated IPOX protocols for ALK and PD-L1 detection were recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration as companion diagnostics for targeted therapies, but consistent interpretive criteria remain to be elucidated, and such protocols do not yet exist for other biomarkers. The inclusion of cytology specimens in clinical trials would expand patients' access to testing and treatment, yet there is a scarcity of clinical trial data regarding the application of IPOX to cytology, which can be attributed to trial designers' lack of familiarity with the advantages and limitations of cytology. The content of this review may be used to inform clinical trial design and advance IPOX validation studies.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnosis , Cytogenetic Analysis , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung/metabolism , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Automation, Laboratory , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Biopsy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/metabolism , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Cytogenetic Analysis/trends , Gene Rearrangement , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques/trends , Lung/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/trends , Mutation , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Neoplasm Staging , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis
12.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 74(5): 561-567, 2016 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27628190

ABSTRACT

Acquired recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities are frequent in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). They can be associated with good or poor prognostic factors, and also with gene mutations. Chromosomal abnormalities could be clonal or sub-clonal. Assessing the TP53 status (deletion/mutation) is currently mandatory before treating patients. The search for 11q deletion (ATM gene) is also recommended. Finally, the prognostic value of other chromosomal abnormalities including complex karyotype is still debated.


Subject(s)
Cytogenetic Analysis/standards , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/therapy , Chromosome Aberrations , Cytogenetic Analysis/methods , Cytogenetic Analysis/trends , France , Hematology/organization & administration , Hematology/standards , Hematology/trends , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/diagnosis , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/genetics , Prognosis , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/standards
13.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 140(12): 1338-1344, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27557410

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: - Fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules is a reliable diagnostic method to determine the nature of thyroid nodules. Nonetheless, indeterminate cytology diagnoses remain a diagnostic challenge. The development of multiplex molecular techniques and the identification of genetic alterations associated with different follicular cell-derived cancers in the thyroid have led to the introduction of several commercially available tests. OBJECTIVE: - To summarize the most common commercially available molecular testing in thyroid cancer, focusing on the technical features and test performance validation. DATA SOURCES: - Peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, and published conference abstracts were reviewed to analyze the advantages and limitations of the most common tests used in the evaluation of thyroid needle aspirations. CONCLUSIONS: - The most common tests available include the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier, ThyGenX, and ThyroSeq. The excellent negative predictive value (NPV) of the Afirma test allows it to be used as a "rule out" test. ThyGenX analyzes a panel of DNA mutations and RNA translocation fusion markers to assess the risk of malignancy with good NPV and positive predictive value. ThyroSeq is a next-generation sequencing-based gene mutation and fusion test that has been reported to have the best NPV and positive predictive value combined, suggesting that it can be used as a "rule in" and "rule out" test. Molecular testing of cytology specimens from thyroid nodules has the potential to play a major role in the evaluation of indeterminate thyroid lesions.


Subject(s)
Cytogenetic Analysis , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Thyroid Gland/metabolism , Thyroid Nodule/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma, Follicular/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma, Follicular/genetics , Adenocarcinoma, Follicular/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma, Follicular/pathology , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Cytogenetic Analysis/trends , Diagnosis, Differential , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/trends , Mutation , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Predictive Value of Tests , Societies, Medical , Thyroid Gland/pathology , Thyroid Nodule/genetics , Thyroid Nodule/metabolism , Thyroid Nodule/pathology , Translocation, Genetic , United States
14.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 140(12): 1318-1322, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27557411

ABSTRACT

Cell blocks are an integral part of cytology, but their utility is recognized probably more now than ever before, largely owing to the significant role they play in ancillary testing, particularly molecular diagnostics. Modifications to improve the cell block method initially introduced more than a century ago have been made over the years. Though their value is acknowledged and they are widely used across laboratories, cell block preparations are not standardized and results of ancillary testing performed on them are inconsistent. This article reviews the state of cell blocks-summarizes the more common, currently available and used methods and their corresponding advantages and shortcomings, outlines the role of alternative techniques (eg, smears), and proposes methods to optimize results.


Subject(s)
Cytological Techniques , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Tissue Fixation , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Cytogenetic Analysis/trends , Cytological Techniques/trends , Humans , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/trends , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/metabolism , Neoplasms/pathology , Quality Improvement/trends , Tissue Fixation/trends
15.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 140(12): 1323-1330, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27479335

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: - Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a well-established method for detection of genomic aberrations in diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive marker testing. OBJECTIVE: - To review common applications of FISH in cytology. DATA SOURCES: - The published literature was reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: - Cytology is particularly well suited for all kinds of FISH applications, which is highlighted in respiratory tract cytology with an increasing demand for predictive FISH testing in lung cancer. Fluorescence in situ hybridization is the gold standard for detection of predictive anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) rearrangements, and the same evaluation criteria as in histology apply to cytology. Several other gene rearrangements, including ROS proto-oncogene 1 receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1), are becoming clinically important and share the same underlining cytogenetic mechanisms with ALK. MET amplification is one of the most common mechanisms of acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors and can be targeted by crizotinib. As genomic aberrations are a hallmark of malignant cells, FISH is a valuable objective ancillary diagnostic tool. In urinary tract cytology, atypical urothelial cells equivocal for malignancy are a common diagnostic dilemma and multitarget FISH can help clarify such cells. Diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma remains one of the most challenging fields in effusion cytology, and ancillary FISH is useful in establishing the diagnosis. Fluorescence in situ hybridization is a morphology-based technique, and the prerequisite for reliable FISH results is a targeted evaluation of the cells in question (eg, cancer or atypical cells). Cytopathologists and cytotechnicians should therefore be involved in molecular testing in order to select the best material and to provide their morphologic expertise.


Subject(s)
Cytogenetic Analysis , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Chromosome Aberrations , Cytogenetic Analysis/trends , Gene Amplification , Gene Rearrangement , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/trends , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/trends , Neoplasm Grading/trends , Neoplasm Staging/trends , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/metabolism , Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Proto-Oncogene Mas
16.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 74(5): 535-546, 2016 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27545007

ABSTRACT

The karyotype is critical for the evaluation of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) at diagnosis. Cytogenetic abnormalities detected in AML are one of the most powerful independent prognostic factors. It impacts on the choice of treatment in clinical trials. All chromosomes can be targeted, common chromosomal abnormalities are recurrent and may be associated with a cytological well-defined type. In 40% of the cases, the karyotype is normal and must be associated with molecular biology studies that can refine the prognosis. The usefulness of the karyotype is more limited during the follow-up of the patient due to its limited sensitivity, but it is still useful in the clinical management of relapse. Since 2001, the WHO (World Health Organization) classification of hematological malignancies integrates cytogenetic data in the classification of AML. Karyotype is therefore mandatory in the diagnosis of AML.


Subject(s)
Cytogenetic Analysis/standards , Hematology/standards , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Chromosome Aberrations , Cytogenetic Analysis/methods , Cytogenetic Analysis/trends , France , Hematology/organization & administration , Humans , Karyotyping , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Prognosis , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/standards
17.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 74(5): 511-515, 2016 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27477825

ABSTRACT

Cytogenetic evaluation is one the most important criteria for diagnosis and response to treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia, and recent baseline prognostic factors including particular additional clonal cytogenetic abnormalities have been established. The French cytogenetic group in hematology GFCH proposes here an updating of recommendations for cytogenetic assessment of CML in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors.


Subject(s)
Cytogenetic Analysis/standards , Hematology/standards , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/diagnosis , Chromosome Aberrations , Cytogenetic Analysis/methods , Cytogenetic Analysis/trends , France , Hematology/organization & administration , Humans , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/genetics , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Monitoring, Physiologic/standards , Societies, Medical , Translocation, Genetic
18.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 74(5): 517-523, 2016 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27477946

ABSTRACT

The recent years have witnessed tremendous progress in the molecular characterization of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Beside a better understanding of pathophysiology, these abnormalities often constitute very useful diagnostic markers in diseases where exclusion of reactive states used to be the strongest argument. However, conventional and molecular cytogenetics keep a major interest in MPN, either as a second line exploration, in cases where no molecular marker is available, for differential diagnosis or as a proof of clonality or in first line for cases with hyperleukocytosis, for differential diagnosis (CML), to evidence druggable targets (ABL1, RET, PDGFR…) or as a prognosis marker. In this article, we will review the interest of cytogenetic techniques in myeloproliferative neoplasms.


Subject(s)
Cytogenetic Analysis/standards , Hematology/standards , Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic, Atypical, BCR-ABL Negative/diagnosis , Myeloproliferative Disorders/diagnosis , Cytogenetic Analysis/methods , Cytogenetic Analysis/trends , Hematology/organization & administration , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic, Atypical, BCR-ABL Negative/genetics , Myeloproliferative Disorders/genetics , Philadelphia Chromosome , Societies, Medical/standards
19.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 74(5): 509-510, 2016 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27465598

ABSTRACT

Cytogenetic analysis is still important in the management of many hematological malignancies, despite the new techniques available such as the high-throughput sequencing analysis, and the discovery of many acquired gene mutations in these diseases. The Groupe francophone de cytogénétique hématologique (GFCH) published in 2004 the recommendations for the cytogenetic management of hematological malignancies. It reports here the update of these recommendations, with a review of the literature for each disease.


Subject(s)
Cytogenetic Analysis , Hematologic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Hematology/standards , Cytogenetic Analysis/methods , Cytogenetic Analysis/standards , Cytogenetic Analysis/trends , France , Hematologic Neoplasms/genetics , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hematology/organization & administration , Humans , Societies, Medical/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...