Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 4.347
Filter
1.
Cancer Med ; 13(9): e6910, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38746969

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC) is known for its heightened responsiveness to immunotherapy. However, establishing robust predictive markers for immunotherapy efficacy remains imperative. This retrospective study aimed to elucidate the genetic landscape of MSI-H CRC and correlate these genetic alterations with immunotherapy outcomes in a cohort of 121 patients. METHODS: We analyzed clinical and molecular data from 121 patients with MSI-H CRC. We conducted a thorough genetic analysis of MSI-H CRC patients, with a specific emphasis on the APC, TP53, RAS, and MMR genes. We further analyzed the relationship between gene mutations and immunotherapy efficacy. The primary endpoints analyzed were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). All statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS26.0 and R 4.2.0 software. RESULTS: Our findings underscored the complexity of the genetic landscape in MSI-H CRC, shedding light on the intricate interplay of these genes in CRC development. Notably, mutations in MMR genes exhibited a distinctive pattern, providing insights into the underlying mechanisms of MSI-H. Furthermore, our results revealed correlations between specific genetic alterations and immunotherapy outcomes, with a particular focus on treatment response rates and progression-free survival. CONCLUSION: This study represents a significant step toward unraveling the genetic nuances of MSI-H CRC. The distinctive pattern of MMR gene mutations not only adds depth to our understanding of MSI-H CRC but also hints at potential avenues for targeted therapies. This research sets the stage for future investigations aimed at refining therapeutic strategies and improving outcomes for patients with MSI-H CRC.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Microsatellite Instability , Mutation , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/immunology , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Immunotherapy/methods , Aged, 80 and over , Progression-Free Survival , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , DNA Mismatch Repair , Treatment Outcome
2.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 119(2): 136-155, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743828

ABSTRACT

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) exhibits molecular and morphological diversity, involving genetic, epigenetic alterations, and disruptions in signaling pathways. This necessitates a comprehensive review synthesizing recent advancements in molecular mechanisms, established biomarkers, as well as emerging ones like CDX2 for enhanced CRC assessment. Material and Methods: This review analyzes the last decade's literature and current guidelines to study CRC's molecular intricacies. It extends the analysis beyond traditional biomarkers to include emerging ones like CDX2, examining their interaction with carcinogenic mechanisms and molecular pathways, alongside reviewing current testing methodologies. Results: A multi-biomarker strategy, incorporating both traditional and emerging biomarkers like CDX2, is crucial for optimizing CRC management. This strategy elucidates the complex interaction between biomarkers and the tumor's molecular pathways, significantly influencing prognostic evaluations, therapeutic decision-making, and paving the way for personalized medicine in CRC. Conclusions: This review proposes CDX2 as an emerging prognostic biomarker and emphasizes the necessity of thorough molecular profiling for individualized treatment strategies. By enhancing CRC treatment approaches and prognostic evaluation, this effort marks a step forward in precision oncology, leveraging an enriched understanding of tumor behavior.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , CDX2 Transcription Factor , Colorectal Neoplasms , Membrane Proteins , Microsatellite Instability , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/metabolism , Colorectal Neoplasms/classification , CDX2 Transcription Factor/metabolism , CDX2 Transcription Factor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Prognosis , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , GTP Phosphohydrolases/genetics , GTP Phosphohydrolases/metabolism , DNA Mismatch Repair , Predictive Value of Tests , Precision Medicine
4.
Surg Pathol Clin ; 17(2): 295-305, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692812

ABSTRACT

Since US Food and Drug Administration approval of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) as the first companion diagnostic for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small cell lung cancer, many patients have experienced increased overall survival. To improve selection of ICI responders versus nonresponders, microsatellite instability/mismatch repair deficiency (MSI/MMR) and tumor mutation burden (TMB) came into play. Clinical data show PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and TMB are independent predictive immunotherapy biomarkers. Harmonization of testing methodologies, optimization of assay design, and results analysis are ongoing. Future algorithms to determine immunotherapy eligibility might involve complementary use of current and novel biomarkers. Artificial intelligence could facilitate algorithm implementation to convert complex genetic data into recommendations for specific ICIs.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , DNA Mismatch Repair , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Lung Neoplasms , Microsatellite Instability , Mutation , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , B7-H1 Antigen/genetics
5.
Cells ; 13(8)2024 Apr 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38667294

ABSTRACT

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death in the United States, and up to half of patients develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Notably, somatic genetic mutations, such as mutations in RAS, BRAF, mismatch repair (MMR) genes, TP53, and SMAD4, have been shown to play a prognostic role in patients with CRLM. This review summarizes and appraises the current literature regarding the most relevant somatic mutations in surgically treated CRLM by not only reviewing representative studies, but also providing recommendations for areas of future research. In addition, advancements in genetic testing and an increasing emphasis on precision medicine have led to a more nuanced understanding of these mutations; thus, more granular data for each mutation are reviewed when available. Importantly, such knowledge can pave the way for precision medicine with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Liver Neoplasms , Mutation , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Liver Neoplasms/genetics , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Mutation/genetics , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics , Precision Medicine
6.
Pathol Oncol Res ; 30: 1611719, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38655493

ABSTRACT

Current clinical guidelines recommend mismatch repair (MMR) protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) or molecular microsatellite instability (MSI) tests as predictive markers of immunotherapies. Most of the pathological guidelines consider MMR protein IHC as the gold standard test to identify cancers with MMR deficiency and recommend molecular MSI tests only in special circumstances or to screen for Lynch syndrome. However, there are data in the literature which suggest that the two test types may not be equal. For example, molecular epidemiology studies reported different rates of deficient MMR (dMMR) and MSI in various cancer types. Additionally, direct comparisons of the two tests revealed relatively frequent discrepancies between MMR IHC and MSI tests, especially in non-colorectal and non-endometrial cancers and in cases with unusual dMMR phenotypes. There are also scattered clinical data showing that the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is different if the patient selection was based on dMMR versus MSI status of the cancers. All these observations question the current dogma that dMMR phenotype and genetic MSI status are equal predictive markers of the immunotherapies.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , DNA Mismatch Repair , Microsatellite Instability , Humans , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Neoplasms/genetics , Prognosis
7.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res ; 43(1): 114, 2024 Apr 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627815

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy is primarily hindered by the limited T-cell immune response rate and immune evasion capacity of tumor cells. Autophagy-related protein 7 (ATG7) plays an important role in autophagy and it has been linked to cancer. However, the role of ATG7 in the effect of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) treatment on high microsatellite instability (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) CRC is still poorly understood. METHODS: In this study, patients from the cancer genome altas (TCGA) COAD/READ cohorts were used to investigate the biological mechanism driving ATG7 development. Several assays were conducted including the colony formation, cell viability, qRT-PCR, western blot, immunofluorescence, flow cytometry, ELISA, immunohistochemistry staining and in vivo tumorigenicity tests. RESULTS: We found that ATG7 plays a crucial role in MSI-H CRC. Its knockdown decreased tumor growth and caused an infiltration of CD8+ T effector cells in vivo. ATG7 inhibition restored surface major histocompatibility complex I (MHC-I) levels, causing improved antigen presentation and anti-tumor T cell response by activating reactive oxygen species (ROS)/NF-κB pathway. Meanwhile, ATG7 inhibition also suppressed cholesterol accumulation and augmentation of anti-tumor immune responses. Combining ATG7 inhibition and statins improved the therapeutic benefit of anti-PD-1 in MSI-H CRC. Importantly, CRC patients with high expression of both ATG7 and recombinant 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) experienced worse prognosis compared to those with low ATG7 and HMGCR expression. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of ATG7 leads to upregulation of MHC-I expression, augments immune response and suppresses cholesterol accumulation. These findings demonstrate that ATG7 inhibition has therapeutic potential and application of statins can increase the sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary , Humans , Autophagy-Related Protein 7/genetics , Cholesterol , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , DNA Mismatch Repair , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology , Immunity , Microsatellite Instability
8.
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi ; 27(4): 353-358, 2024 Apr 25.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38644240

ABSTRACT

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has achieved exciting efficacy with high clinical complete response (cCR) and pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and durable long-term effects. PD-1 checkpoint blockade-based immunotherapy has been highly successful in microsatellite instability high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) colorectal cancer and has been recommended as the first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer by domestic and international guidelines. Several studies have shown that immunotherapy can be a potentially curable treatment for MSI-H rectal cancer and has even shown promise in organ preservation in colon cancer. In this study, we first clarified the feasibility of the watch-and-wait strategy after PD-1 checkpoint blockade treatment by indirect and direct evidence. Then from the assessment tools (including digital rectal examination, endoscopy, radiology, and lymph node assessment), the viable assessment methods of cCR for immunotherapy and related difficulties are proposed. Finally, the medication choices of immunotherapy, the treatment regimen, and the follow-up strategy are further discussed. We hope that neoadjuvant immunotherapy could be appropriately applied in MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer so that more patients can achieve organ preservation.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Immunotherapy , Microsatellite Instability , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Humans , Immunotherapy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Organ Preservation/methods , DNA Mismatch Repair
9.
Cancer Med ; 13(7): e7041, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38558366

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Up to 70% of suspected Lynch syndrome patients harboring MMR deficient tumors lack identifiable germline pathogenic variants in MMR genes, being referred to as Lynch-like syndrome (LLS). Previous studies have reported biallelic somatic MMR inactivation in a variable range of LLS-associated tumors. Moreover, translating tumor testing results into patient management remains controversial. Our aim is to assess the challenges associated with the implementation of tumoral MMR gene testing in routine workflows. METHODS: Here, we present the clinical characterization of 229 LLS patients. MMR gene testing was performed in 39 available tumors, and results were analyzed using two variant allele frequency (VAF) thresholds (≥5% and ≥10%). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: More biallelic somatic events were identified at VAF ≥ 5% than ≥10% (35.9% vs. 25.6%), although the rate of nonconcordant results regarding immunohistochemical pattern increased (30.8% vs. 20.5%). Interpretation difficulties question the current utility of the identification of MMR somatic hits in the diagnostic algorithm of suspected LS cases.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis , Colorectal Neoplasms , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/pathology , Germ-Line Mutation , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics
10.
BMJ Open ; 14(4): e084496, 2024 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38670615

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Whether gastric cancer (GC) patients with deficient mismatch repair or microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) benefit from perioperative (neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant) chemotherapy is controversial. This protocol delineates the planned scope and methods for a systematic review and meta-analysis that aims to compare the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy with surgery alone in resectable dMMR/MSI-H GC patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study protocol is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols-P guideline. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane (CENTRAL), and the Web of Science databases will be searched, supplemented by a secondary screening of relevant records. Both randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies will be included in this study. The primary and secondary outcomes under scrutiny will be overall survival, disease-free survival and progression-free survival. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias. We will analyse different treatment settings (eg, neoadjuvant or adjuvant or combined as perioperative chemotherapies) separately and conduct sensitivity analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval is required for this systematic review and meta-analysis, as no individual patient data will be collected. The findings of our study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023494276.


Subject(s)
DNA Mismatch Repair , Microsatellite Instability , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Stomach Neoplasms , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Research Design
11.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0302274, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662796

ABSTRACT

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have proved immense clinical progression in the treatment of certain cancers. The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is correlated with mismatch repair system deficiency and is exceptionally administered based exclusively on this biological mechanism independent of the cancer type. The promising effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors has left an increasing demand for analytical tools evaluating the mismatch repair status. The analysis of microsatellite instability (MSI), reflecting an indirect but objective manner the inactivation of the mismatch repair system, plays several roles in clinical practice and, therefore, its evaluation is of high relevance. Analysis of MSI by PCR followed by fragment analysis on capillary electrophoresis remains the gold standard method for detection of a deficient mismatch repair system and thereby treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Novel technologies have been applied and concepts such as tumor mutation burden have been introduced. However, to date, most of these technologies require high costs or the need of matched non-tumor tissue as internal comparator. In this study, we present a novel, one-instrument, fast, and objective method for the detection of MSI (MicroSight® MSI 1-step HRM Analysis), which does not depend on the use of matched non-tumor tissue. The assay analyzes five well-described mononucleotide microsatellite sequences by real-time PCR followed by high-resolution melt and evaluates microsatellite length variations via PCR product melting profiles. The assay was evaluated using two different patient cohorts and evaluation included several DNA extraction methodologies, two different PCR platforms, and an inter-laboratory ring study. The MicroSight® MSI assay showed a high repeatability regardless of DNA extraction method and PCR platform, and a 100% agreement of the MSI status with PCR fragment analysis methods applied as clinical comparator.


Subject(s)
Microsatellite Instability , Humans , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Female , Male , Microsatellite Repeats/genetics
13.
Mol Cell ; 84(7): 1224-1242.e13, 2024 Apr 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38458201

ABSTRACT

Although mismatch repair (MMR) is essential for correcting DNA replication errors, it can also recognize other lesions, such as oxidized bases. In G0 and G1, MMR is kept in check through unknown mechanisms as it is error-prone during these cell cycle phases. We show that in mammalian cells, D-type cyclins are recruited to sites of oxidative DNA damage in a PCNA- and p21-dependent manner. D-type cyclins inhibit the proteasomal degradation of p21, which competes with MMR proteins for binding to PCNA, thereby inhibiting MMR. The ability of D-type cyclins to limit MMR is CDK4- and CDK6-independent and is conserved in G0 and G1. At the G1/S transition, the timely, cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase (CRL)-dependent degradation of D-type cyclins and p21 enables MMR activity to efficiently repair DNA replication errors. Persistent expression of D-type cyclins during S-phase inhibits the binding of MMR proteins to PCNA, increases the mutational burden, and promotes microsatellite instability.


Subject(s)
Cyclins , DNA Mismatch Repair , Animals , Cyclins/genetics , Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen/genetics , Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen/metabolism , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21/genetics , Interphase , Mammals/metabolism
14.
Eur J Cancer ; 202: 114020, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38502988

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study determined survival responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), comparing mono- (mono) and combo-immunotherapy (combo) in patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) by analyzing quantitative imaging data and clinical factors. METHODS: One hundred fifty patients were included from two centers and divided into training (n = 105) and validation (n = 45) cohorts. Radiologists manually annotated chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography and calculated tumor burden. Progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed, and variables were selected through Recursive Feature Elimination. Cutoff values were determined using maximally selected rank statistics to binarize features, forming a risk score with hazard ratio-derived weights. RESULTS: In total, 2258 lesions were annotated with excellent reproducibility. Key variables in the training cohort included: total tumor volume (cutoff: 73 cm3), lesion count (cutoff: 20), age (cutoff: 60) and the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Their respective weights were 1.13, 0.96, 0.91, and 0.38, resulting in a risk score cutoff of 1.36. Low-score patients showed similar overall survival and PFS regardless of treatment, while those with a high-score had significantly worse survivals with mono vs combo (P = 0.004 and P = 0.0001). In the validation set, low-score patients exhibited no significant difference in overall survival and PFS with mono or combo. However, patients with a high-score had worse PFS with mono (P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: A score based on total tumor volume, lesion count, the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis, and age can guide MSI-H mCRC treatment decisions, allowing oncologists to identify suitable candidates for mono and combo ICI therapies.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Peritoneal Neoplasms , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Prognosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Microsatellite Instability , DNA Mismatch Repair
15.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 197: 104331, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38521284

ABSTRACT

Even with colonoscopy surveillance, Lynch syndromes (LS) carriers still develop colorectal cancer (CRC). The cumulative incidence of CRCs under colonoscopy surveillance varies depending on the affected mismatch repair (MMR) gene. However, the precise mechanisms driving these epidemiological patterns remain incompletely understood. In recent years, several potential mechanisms explaining the occurrence of CRCs during colonoscopy surveillance have been proposed in individuals with and without LS. These encompass biological factors like concealed/accelerated carcinogenesis through a bypassed adenoma stage and accelerated progression from adenomas. Alongside these, various colonoscopy-related factors may contribute to formation of CRCs under colonoscopy surveillance, like missed yet detectable (pre)cancerous lesions, detected yet incompletely removed (pre)cancerous lesions, and colonoscopy-induced carcinogenesis due to tumor cell reimplantation. In this comprehensive literature update, we reviewed these potential factors and evaluated their relevance to each MMR group in an attempt to raise further awareness and stimulate research regarding this conflicting phenomenon.


Subject(s)
Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/pathology , Colonoscopy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics
16.
ESMO Open ; 9(4): 102971, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38518549

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most oesophagogastric adenocarcinomas (OGAs) and colorectal cancers (CRCs) are mismatch repair proficient (MMRp), responding poorly to immune checkpoint inhibition. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of domatinostat (histone deacetylase inhibitor) plus avelumab (anti-PD-L1 antibody) in patients with previously treated inoperable, advanced/metastatic MMRp OGA and CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were evaluated in a multicentre, open-label dose escalation/dose expansion phase II trial. In the escalation phase, patients received escalating doses of domatinostat [100 mg once daily (OD), 200 mg OD, 200 mg twice daily (BD)] orally for 14 days followed by continuous dosing plus avelumab 10 mg/kg administered intravenously 2-weekly (2qw) to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). The trial expansion phase evaluated the best objective response rate (ORR) during 6 months by RECIST version 1.1 using a Simon two-stage optimal design with 2/9 and 1/10 responses required to proceed to stage 2 in the OGA and CRC cohorts, respectively. RESULTS: Patients (n = 40) were registered between February 2019 and October 2021. Patients in the dose escalation phase (n = 12) were evaluated to confirm the RP2D of domatinostat 200 mg BD plus avelumab 10 mg/kg. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Twenty-one patients were treated at the RP2D, 19 (9 OGA and 10 CRC) were assessable for the best ORR; 2 patients with CRC did not receive combination treatment and were not assessable for the primary endpoint analysis. Six patients were evaluated in the dose escalation and expansion phases. In the OGA cohort, the best ORR was 22.2% (95% one-sided confidence interval lower bound 4.1) and the median duration of disease control was 11.3 months (range 9.9-12.7 months). No responses were observed in the CRC cohort. No treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were reported at the RP2D. CONCLUSIONS: Responses in the OGA cohort met the criteria to expand to stage 2 of recruitment with an acceptable safety profile. There was insufficient signal in the CRC cohort to progress to stage 2. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03812796 (registered 23rd January 2019).


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Colorectal Neoplasms , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Middle Aged , Aged , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , DNA Mismatch Repair , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Aged, 80 and over , Hydroxamic Acids/therapeutic use , Hydroxamic Acids/pharmacology , Hydroxamic Acids/administration & dosage
17.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 67(6): 762-771, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38479009

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In April 2023, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network endorsed neoadjuvant immunotherapy for select patients with nonmetastatic mismatch repair deficient colon cancer. Approximately 15% of incident colon cancers are mismatch repair deficient, resulting in a distinct molecular subtype with high microsatellite instability that is responsive to immune checkpoint inhibition. OBJECTIVE: To describe the existing evidence supporting neoadjuvant immunotherapy for mismatch repair deficient, microsatellite unstable nonmetastatic colon cancer. DATA SOURCES: A medical librarian performed PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science searches most recently on April 24, 2023. The PubMed search was re-run on September 26, 2023, to identify any additional studies published between April 24 and September 26, 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Two authors screened titles and abstracts in the published studies. The inclusion criteria were 1) English language, 2) adults with primary cancer of the colon, 3) nonmetastatic disease, 4) neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and 5) reporting on 10 or more cases. INTERVENTION: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety (grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events) and efficacy (complete pathologic responses). RESULTS: From 7691 studies identified, 6370 were screened and 8 were included. Various agents, dosing regimens, and treatment durations were used, with durations of immunotherapy ranging from 1 to 16 cycles. Complete R0 resections were consistently achieved in 98% to 100% of resections. Of patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and underwent resection, 50% to 91% had ypT0N0 pathology. The safety profiles were generally favorable, with grade 1 to 2 treatment-related adverse events (mostly immune-related) during immunotherapy reported in 22.2% to 70% of patients. Postoperative complications after neoadjuvant immunotherapy were reassuring, with no severe complications reported. LIMITATIONS: Small number of heterogeneous and uncontrolled studies precluding a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition is associated with high rates of pathologic complete responses in locally advanced colon cancer. The literature is limited, particularly for postoperative outcomes, and more studies are needed to understand the safety and positioning of these regimens in the neoadjuvant context.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , DNA Mismatch Repair , Immunotherapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Colonic Neoplasms/therapy , Colonic Neoplasms/genetics , Colonic Neoplasms/immunology , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Immunotherapy/methods , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Microsatellite Instability
18.
Cancer Med ; 13(7): e6994, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38545852

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While previous studies have indicated variability in distant metastatic potential among different mismatch repair (MMR) states in colorectal cancer (CRC), their findings remain inconclusive, especially considering potential differences across various ethnic backgrounds. Furthermore, the gene regulatory networks and the underlying mechanisms responsible for these variances in metastatic potential across MMR states have yet to be elucidated. METHODS: We collected 2058 consecutive primary CRC samples from the South West of China and assessed the expression of MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) using immunohistochemistry. To explore the inconsistencies between different MMR statuses and recurrence, we performed a meta-analysis. To delve deeper, we employed Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA), ClueGo, and iRegulon, pinpointing gene expression networks and key regulatory molecules linked to metastasis and recurrence in CRC. Lastly, both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were applied to determine the impact of core regulatory molecules on metastasis. RESULTS: Of the samples, 8.2% displayed deficient MMR (dMMR), with losses of MLH1 and PSM2 observed in 40.8% and 63.9%, respectively. A unique 24.3% isolated loss of PMS2 without concurrent metastasis was identified, a result that diverges from established literature. Additionally, our meta-analysis further solidifies the reduced recurrence likelihood in dMMR CRC samples compared to proficient MMR (pMMR). Two gene expression networks tied to distant metastasis and recurrence were identified, with a majority of metastasis-related genes located on chromosomes 8 and 18. An IRF1 positive feedback loop was discerned in the metastasis-related network, and IRF1 was identified as a predictive marker for both recurrence-free and distant metastasis-free survival across multiple datasets. CONCLUSION: Geographical and ethnic factors might influence peculiarities in MMR protein loss. Our findings also highlight new gene expression networks and crucial regulatory molecules in CRC metastasis, enhancing our comprehension of the mechanisms driving distant metastasis.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Protein Deficiency , Humans , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , DNA Mismatch Repair , Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2/metabolism , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology
19.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 2702, 2024 Mar 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38538613

ABSTRACT

The efficiency of replication error repair is a critical factor governing the emergence of mutations. However, it has so far been impossible to study this efficiency at the level of individual cells and to investigate if it varies within isogenic cell populations. In addition, why some errors escape repair remains unknown. Here we apply a combination of fluorescent labelling of the Escherichia coli Mismatch Repair (MMR) complex, microfluidics, and time-lapse microscopy, to monitor in real-time the fate of >20000 replication errors. We show that i) many mutations result from errors that are detected by MMR but inefficiently repaired ii) this limited repair efficiency is due to a temporal constraint imposed by the transient nature of the DNA strand discrimination signal, a constraint that is likely conserved across organisms, and iii) repair capacity varies from cell to cell, resulting in a subpopulation of cells with higher mutation rate. Such variations could influence the fitness and adaptability of populations, accelerating for instance the emergence of antibiotic resistance.


Subject(s)
DNA Damage , DNA Replication , DNA Replication/genetics , Mutation , Mutagenesis , Escherichia coli/genetics , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics
20.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer ; 63(3): e23231, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38459936

ABSTRACT

Lynch syndrome-associated endometrial cancer patients often present multiple synchronous tumors and this assessment can affect treatment strategies. We present a case of a 27-year-old woman with tumors in the uterine corpus, cervix, and ovaries who was diagnosed with endometrial cancer and exhibited cervical invasion and ovarian metastasis. Her family history suggested Lynch syndrome, and genetic testing identified a variant of uncertain significance, MLH1 p.L582H. We conducted immunohistochemical staining, microsatellite instability analysis, and Sanger sequencing for Lynch syndrome-associated cancers in three generations of the family and identified consistent MLH1 loss. Whole-exome sequencing for the corpus, cervical, and ovarian tumors of the proband identified a copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (LOH) occurring at the MLH1 position in all tumors. This indicated that the germline variant and the copy-neutral LOH led to biallelic loss of MLH1 and was the cause of cancer initiation. All tumors shared a portion of somatic mutations with high mutant allele frequencies, suggesting a common clonal origin. There were no mutations shared only between the cervix and ovary samples. The profiles of mutant allele frequencies shared between the corpus and cervix or ovary indicated that two different subclones originating from the corpus independently metastasized to the cervix or ovary. Additionally, all tumors presented unique mutations in endometrial cancer-associated genes such as ARID1A and PIK3CA. In conclusion, we demonstrated clonal origin and genomic diversity in a Lynch syndrome-associated endometrial cancer, suggesting the importance of evaluating multiple sites in Lynch syndrome patients with synchronous tumors.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis , Endometrial Neoplasms , MutL Protein Homolog 1 , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary , Adult , Female , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/complications , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , DNA Mismatch Repair , Endometrial Neoplasms/genetics , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Genomics , Microsatellite Instability , MutL Protein Homolog 1/genetics , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...