Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 356
Filter
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(20): e38152, 2024 May 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38758903

ABSTRACT

Parkinson disease (PD), a prevalent neurodegenerative ailment in the elderly, relies mainly on pharmacotherapy, yet deep brain stimulation (DBS) emerges as a vital remedy for refractory cases. This study performs a bibliometric analysis on DBS in PD, delving into research trends and study impact to offer comprehensive insights for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers, illuminating the current state and evolutionary trajectory of research in this domain. A systematic search on March 13, 2023, in the Scopus database utilized keywords like "Parkinson disease," "PD," "Parkinsonism," "Deep brain stimulation," and "DBS." The top 1000 highly cited publications on DBS in PD underwent scientometric analysis via VOS Viewer and R Studio's Bibliometrix package, covering publication characteristics, co-authorship, keyword co-occurrence, thematic clustering, and trend topics. The bibliometric analysis spanned 1984 to 2021, involving 1000 cited articles from 202 sources. The average number of citations per document were 140.9, with 31,854 references. "Movement Disorders" led in publications (n = 98), followed by "Brain" (n = 78) and "Neurology" (n = 65). The University of Oxford featured prominently. Thematic keyword clustering identified 9 core research areas, such as neuropsychological function and motor circuit electrophysiology. The shift from historical neurosurgical procedures to contemporary focuses like "beta oscillations" and "neuroethics" was evident. The bibliometric analysis emphasizes UK and US dominance, outlining 9 key research areas pivotal for reshaping Parkinson treatment. A discernible shift from invasive neurosurgery to DBS is observed. The call for personalized DBS, integration with NIBS, and exploration of innovative avenues marks the trajectory for future research.


Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Deep Brain Stimulation , Parkinson Disease , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Humans , Deep Brain Stimulation/statistics & numerical data , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Biomedical Research/trends , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data
2.
Neurotherapeutics ; 21(3): e00337, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38377638

ABSTRACT

Stroke is one of the most common and debilitating neurological conditions worldwide. Those who survive experience motor, sensory, speech, vision, and/or cognitive deficits that severely limit remaining quality of life. While rehabilitation programs can help improve patients' symptoms, recovery is often limited, and patients frequently continue to experience impairments in functional status. In this review, invasive neuromodulation techniques to augment the effects of conventional rehabilitation methods are described, including vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) and brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). In addition, the evidence base for each of these techniques, pivotal trials, and future directions are explored. Finally, emerging technologies such as functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and the shift to artificial intelligence-enabled implants and wearables are examined. While the field of implantable devices for chronic stroke recovery is still in a nascent stage, the data reviewed are suggestive of immense potential for reducing the impact and impairment from this globally prevalent disorder.


Subject(s)
Brain-Computer Interfaces , Deep Brain Stimulation , Neuronal Plasticity , Stroke Rehabilitation , Stroke , Vagus Nerve Stimulation , Humans , Brain-Computer Interfaces/trends , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Stroke/therapy , Stroke/physiopathology , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Stroke Rehabilitation/methods , Stroke Rehabilitation/trends , Vagus Nerve Stimulation/methods , Vagus Nerve Stimulation/trends , Chronic Disease
3.
Inf. psiquiátr ; (246): 82-92, 1er trimestre 2022.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-208060

ABSTRACT

Tras co-liderar el primer ensayo clínico sobre la estimulación cerebralprofunda en esquizofrenia resistente al tratamiento, investigadoresde FIDMAG, junto con investigadores del Hospital de la SantaCreu i Sant Pau revisan la literatura hasta la fecha sobre las basesneurobiológicas de la esquizofrenia y las localizaciones previamentepropuestas y empleadas en estimulación cerebral profunda (ECP).Esta revisión aporta información clave para la colocación de loselectrodos en futuros ensayos clínicos, destacando estructuras comoel núcleo accumbens o el córtex cingulado anterior, como potencialmenteprometedoras para su empleo en la ECP. Y destacando lanecesidad de continuar con la investigación para dilucidar las basesneurobiológicas de la esquizofrenia que permitirán avanzar en lostratamientos de la esquizofrenia. (AU)


After co-leading the first clinical trial on deep brain stimulationin treatment-resistant schizophrenia, FIDMAG researchers, togetherwith researchers from the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau reviewthe literature to date on the neurobiological basis of schizophreniaand the locations previously proposed and used in deep brain stimulation(DBS). This review provides key information for the placementof electrodes in future clinical trials, highlighting structuressuch as the nucleus accumbens or the anterior cingulate cortex aspotentially promising for use in DBS. And highlighting the need forcontinued research to elucidate the neurobiological basis of schizophreniathat will advance treatments for schizophrenia. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Deep Brain Stimulation/instrumentation , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Schizophrenia/therapy
4.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 89: 199-205, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34274215

ABSTRACT

The use of telemedicine in the management of chronic neurological conditions including movement disorders has expanded over time. In addition to enabling remote access to specialized care, telemedicine has also been shown to reduce caregiver burden and to improve patient satisfaction. With the COVID-19 pandemic, implementation of telehealth for patients with movement disorders, particularly those with more severe mobility issues, has increased rapidly. Although telemedicine care has been shown to be effective for patients with various movement disorders, its utilization for patients with device aided therapies such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) is limited due to challenges related to adjusting these devices remotely and to the lack of consensus recommendations for using telemedicine in this patient population. Thus, guidelines for telemedicine and DBS will assist clinicians on the appropriate implementation of telemedicine to provide care to DBS patients. Optimizing the use of telemedicine for DBS will expand this type of therapy to remote locations with limited access to programming expertise, and also reduce the need for patient travel. Telemedicine is particularly important during the ongoing pandemic due to infection risk and limited access to clinic visits. In this article we review the currently available and emerging strategies for telemedicine and remote care for DBS. We then outline common principles and recommendations for telemedicine care in patients with DBS, review patient selection and best practices. Finally, we briefly discuss the current state of reimbursement for DBS telemedicine visits.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Telemedicine/trends , COVID-19 , Deep Brain Stimulation/standards , Humans , Pandemics , Remote Consultation , Telemedicine/standards
5.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 86: 135-138, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34049812

ABSTRACT

The evaluation and management of patients with movement disorders has evolved considerably due to the COVID-19 pandemic, including the assessment of candidates for deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy. Members of the Neuropsychology Focus Group from the Parkinson Study Group Functional Neurosurgical Working Group met virtually to discuss current practices and solutions, build consensus, and to inform the DBS team and community regarding the complexities of performing DBS neuropsychological evaluations during COVID-19. It is our viewpoint that the practice of neuropsychology has adapted successfully to provide tele-neuropsychological pre-DBS evaluations during the global pandemic, thus permanently changing the landscape of neuropsychological services.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Movement Disorders/psychology , Movement Disorders/surgery , Neuropsychological Tests , Neuropsychology/trends , Neurosurgery/trends , Pandemics , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Parkinson Disease/surgery , Deep Brain Stimulation/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Telemedicine
6.
Neurotherapeutics ; 18(3): 1665-1677, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33904113

ABSTRACT

Deep brain stimulation (DBS), specifically thalamic DBS, has achieved promising results to reduce seizure severity and frequency in pharmacoresistant epilepsies, thereby establishing it for clinical use. The mechanisms of action are, however, still unknown. We evidenced the brain networks directly modulated by centromedian (CM) nucleus-DBS and responsible for clinical outcomes in a cohort of patients uniquely diagnosed with generalized pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Preoperative imaging and long-term (2-11 years) clinical data from ten generalized pharmacoresistant epilepsy patients (mean age at surgery = 30.8 ± 5.9 years, 4 female) were evaluated. Volume of tissue activated (VTA) was included as seeds to reconstruct the targeted network to thalamic DBS from diffusion and functional imaging data. CM-DBS clinical outcome improvement (> 50%) appeared in 80% of patients and was tightly related to VTAs interconnected with a reticular system network encompassing sensorimotor and supplementary motor cortices, together with cerebellum/brainstem. Despite methodological differences, both structural and functional connectomes revealed the same targeted network. Our results demonstrate that CM-DBS outcome in generalized pharmacoresistant epilepsy is highly dependent on the individual connectivity profile, involving the cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuits. The proposed framework could be implemented in future studies to refine stereotactic implantation or the parameters for individualized neuromodulation.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/diagnostic imaging , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/therapy , Intralaminar Thalamic Nuclei/diagnostic imaging , Nerve Net/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/trends , Male , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
7.
Nat Rev Neurol ; 17(2): 75-87, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33244188

ABSTRACT

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neurosurgical procedure that allows targeted circuit-based neuromodulation. DBS is a standard of care in Parkinson disease, essential tremor and dystonia, and is also under active investigation for other conditions linked to pathological circuitry, including major depressive disorder and Alzheimer disease. Modern DBS systems, borrowed from the cardiac field, consist of an intracranial electrode, an extension wire and a pulse generator, and have evolved slowly over the past two decades. Advances in engineering and imaging along with an improved understanding of brain disorders are poised to reshape how DBS is viewed and delivered to patients. Breakthroughs in electrode and battery designs, stimulation paradigms, closed-loop and on-demand stimulation, and sensing technologies are expected to enhance the efficacy and tolerability of DBS. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the technical development of DBS, from its origins to its future. Understanding the evolution of DBS technology helps put the currently available systems in perspective and allows us to predict the next major technological advances and hurdles in the field.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Technology/methods , Biomedical Technology/trends , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Implantable Neurostimulators/trends , Biomedical Technology/instrumentation , Deep Brain Stimulation/instrumentation , Depressive Disorder, Major/physiopathology , Depressive Disorder, Major/surgery , Dystonic Disorders/physiopathology , Dystonic Disorders/surgery , Essential Tremor/physiopathology , Essential Tremor/surgery , Forecasting , Humans , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Parkinson Disease/surgery
8.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 200: 106372, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33246250

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While considered a safe operation, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been associated with various morbidities. We assessed differences in postsurgical complication rates in patients undergoing the most common types of neurostimulation surgery. METHODS: The National Readmission Database (NRD) was queried to identify patients undergoing neurostimulation placement with the diagnosis of Parkinson disease (PD), epilepsy, dystonia, or essential tremor (ET). Demographics and complications, including infection, pneumonia, and neurostimulator revision, were queried for each cohort and compiled. Readmissions were assessed in 30-, 90-, and 180-day intervals. We implemented nearest-neighbor propensity score matching to control for demographic and sample size differences between groups. RESULTS: We identified 3230 patients with Parkinson disease, 1289 with essential tremor, 965 with epilepsy, and 221 with dystonia. Following propensity score matching, 221 patients remained in each cohort. Readmission rates 30-days after hospital discharge for PD patients (15.5 %) were significantly greater than those for ET (7.8 %) and seizure patients (4.4 %). Pneumonia was reported for PD (1.6 %), seizure (3.3 %) and dystonia (1.7 %) patients but not individuals ET. No PD patients were readmitted at 30-days due to dysphagia while individuals treated for ET (6.5 %), seizure (1.6 %) and dystonia (5.2 %) were. DBS-revision surgery was performed for 11.48 % of PD, 6.52 % of ET, 1.64 % of seizure and 6.90 % of dystonia patients within 30-days of hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: 30-day readmission rates vary significantly between indications, with patients receiving DBS for PD having the highest rates. Further longitudinal studies are required to describe drivers of variation in postoperative outcomes following DBS surgery for different indications.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Patient Readmission/trends , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Propensity Score , Adult , Aged , Databases, Factual/economics , Databases, Factual/trends , Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects , Deep Brain Stimulation/economics , Dystonia/economics , Dystonia/epidemiology , Dystonia/surgery , Epilepsy/economics , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Epilepsy/surgery , Essential Tremor/economics , Essential Tremor/epidemiology , Essential Tremor/surgery , Female , Health Care Costs/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/economics , Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , Parkinson Disease/surgery , Patient Readmission/economics , Postoperative Complications/economics , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
9.
Turk Neurosurg ; 31(1): 88-92, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33216337

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate the effect of preoperative levodopa responsiveness to clinical outcomes in the first postoperative year, and to evaluate the changes in the postoperative levodopa responsiveness in patients undergoing subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-nine Parkinson?s Disease (PD) patients undergoing bilateral DBS of the STN were included in this study. Their clinical motor symptoms were assessed preoperatively by UPDRS Part III score in both OFF and ON medication states. Postoperatively, the assessments were obtained in three consecutive conditions. Preoperatively and postoperatively, the percentage difference between these two scores was evaluated as levodopa response. RESULTS: Mean age was 54.6 ± 9 years (27?70). Levodopa response significantly decreased postoperatively by 56% a year. Compared with preoperative med on and postoperative stim on / med on scores, the clinical results of the first year were obtained and an improvement of 25% on the UPDRS 3 score was observed. Compared with preoperative levodopa response and clinical outcomes, better clinical results were obtained in patients with higher preoperative levodopa response (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this study, we confirm that the response of L-dopa decreases after DBS of the STN. The reasons for this finding are not clear. However, DBS of the STN allows for the reduction of PD medications and improvement of daily life activities, motor function, motor fluctuations, and dyskinesia.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Postoperative Care/trends , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiology , Adult , Aged , Antiparkinson Agents/pharmacology , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Levodopa/pharmacology , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Postoperative Care/methods , Subthalamic Nucleus/drug effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
10.
Neurol Clin ; 39(1): 71-85, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33223090

ABSTRACT

"Deep brain stimulation is a safe and effective therapy for the management of a variety of neurologic conditions with Food and Drug Administration or humanitarian exception approval for Parkinson disease, dystonia, tremor, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Advances in neurophysiology, neuroimaging, and technology have driven increasing interest in the potential benefits of neurostimulation in other neuropsychiatric conditions including dementia, depression, pain, Tourette syndrome, and epilepsy, among others. New anatomic or combined targets are being investigated in these conditions to improve symptoms refractory to medications or standard stimulation."


Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Humans
11.
Neurotherapeutics ; 17(4): 1539-1562, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33128174

ABSTRACT

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that carries large health and socioeconomic burdens. Current therapies for PD are ultimately inadequate, both in terms of symptom control and in modification of disease progression. Deep brain stimulation and infusion therapies are the current mainstay for treatment of motor complications of advanced disease, but these have very significant drawbacks and offer no element of disease modification. In fact, there are currently no agents that are established to modify the course of the disease in clinical use for PD. Gene and cell therapies for PD are now being trialled in the clinic. These treatments are diverse and may have a range of niches in the management of PD. They hold great promise for improved treatment of symptoms as well as possibly slowing progression of the disease in the right patient group. Here, we review the current state of the art for these therapies and look to future strategies in this fast-moving field.


Subject(s)
Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/methods , Genetic Therapy/methods , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/trends , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Genetic Therapy/trends , Humans , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/genetics , Treatment Outcome
12.
Brain Stimul ; 13(6): 1765-1773, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33035725

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus interna (GPi) is an effective treatment for cardinal motor symptoms and motor complications in Parkinson's Disease (PD). However, malpositioned DBS electrodes can result in suboptimal therapeutic response. OBJECTIVE: We explored whether recovery of the H-reflex-an easily measured electrophysiological analogue of the stretch reflex, known to be altered in PD-could serve as an adjunct biomarker of suboptimal versus optimal electrode position during STN- or GPi-DBS implantation. METHODS: Changes in soleus H-reflex recovery were investigated intraoperatively throughout awake DBS target refinement across 26 nuclei (14 STN). H-reflex recovery was evaluated during microelectrode recording (MER) and macrostimulation at multiple locations within and outside target nuclei, at varying stimulus intensities. RESULTS: Following MER, H-reflex recovery normalized (i.e., became less Parkinsonian) in 21/26 nuclei, and correlated with on-table motor improvement consistent with an insertional effect. During macrostimulation, H-reflex recovery was maximally normalized in 23/26 nuclei when current was applied at the location within the nucleus producing optimal motor benefit. At these optimal sites, H-reflex normalization was greatest at stimulation intensities generating maximum motor benefit free of stimulation-induced side effects, with subthreshold or suprathreshold intensities generating less dramatic normalization. CONCLUSION: H-reflex recovery is modulated by stimulation of the STN or GPi in patients with PD and varies depending on the location and intensity of stimulation within the target nucleus. H-reflex recovery shows potential as an easily-measured, objective, patient-specific, adjunct biomarker of suboptimal versus optimal electrode position during DBS surgery for PD.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Electrodes, Implanted , H-Reflex/physiology , Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring/methods , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Electrodes, Implanted/trends , Female , Globus Pallidus/physiology , Humans , Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring/trends , Male , Microelectrodes/trends , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiology , Treatment Outcome , Wakefulness/physiology
13.
Brain Stimul ; 13(6): 1743-1752, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32961337

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Abnormal beta band activity in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is known to be exaggerated in patients with Parkinson's disease, and the amplitude of such activity has been associated with akinetic rigid symptoms. New devices for deep brain stimulation (DBS) that operate by adapting the stimulation parameters generally rely on the detection of beta activity amplitude modulations in these patients. Movement-related frequency modulation of beta oscillatory activity has been poorly investigated, despite being an attractive variable for extracting information about basal ganglia activity. OBJECTIVE: We studied the STN oscillatory activity associated with locomotion and proposed a new approach to extract movement related information from beta band activity. METHODS: We recorded bilateral local field potential of the STN in eight parkinsonian patients implanted with DBS electrodes during upright quiet standing and unperturbed walking. Neurophysiological recordings were combined with kinematic measurements and individual molecular brain imaging studies. We then determined the information carried by the STN oscillatory activity about locomotion and we identified task-specific biomarkers. RESULTS: We found a gait-related peak frequency modulation of the beta band of STN recordings of parkinsonian patients. This novel biomarker and the associated power modulations were highly informative to detect the walking state (with respect to standing) in each single patient. CONCLUSION: Frequency modulation in the human STN represents a fundamental aspect of information processing of locomotion. Our information-driven approach could significantly enrich the spectrum of Parkinson's neural markers, with input signals encoding ongoing tasks execution for an appropriate online tuning of DBS delivery.


Subject(s)
Beta Rhythm/physiology , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Gait/physiology , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiology , Aged , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Movement/physiology , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology
14.
Neurotherapeutics ; 17(4): 1378-1392, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32914362

ABSTRACT

In recent years, a precision medicine approach, which customizes medical treatments based on patients' individual profiles and incorporates variability in genes, the environment, and lifestyle, has transformed medical care in numerous medical fields, most notably oncology. Applying a similar approach to Parkinson's disease (PD) may promote the development of disease-modifying agents that could help slow progression or possibly even avert disease development in a subset of at-risk individuals. The urgent need for such trials partially stems from the negative results of clinical trials where interventions treat all PD patients as a single homogenous group. Here, we review the current obstacles towards the development of precision interventions in PD. We also review and discuss the clinical trials that target genetic forms of PD, i.e., GBA-associated and LRRK2-associated PD.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Genetic Therapy/methods , Parkinsonian Disorders/genetics , Parkinsonian Disorders/therapy , Precision Medicine/methods , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/epidemiology , Genetic Therapy/trends , Humans , Leucine-Rich Repeat Serine-Threonine Protein Kinase-2/genetics , Mutation/genetics , Parkinsonian Disorders/epidemiology , Precision Medicine/trends , alpha-Synuclein/genetics
15.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg ; 98(5): 331-336, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32668433

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A wide range of pulse widths (PWs) has been used in globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for dystonia. However, no specific PW has demonstrated clinical superiority, and the paradigm may differ among DBS centers. OBJECTIVE: To investigate how different paradigms of PWs in GPi DBS for dystonia affect implantable pulse generator (IPG) longevities and energy consumption. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with dystonia treated with bilateral GPi DBS at 2 Swedish DBS centers from 2005 to 2015 were included. Different PW paradigms were used at the 2 centers, 60-90 µs (short PWs) and 450 µs (long PW), respectively. The frequency of IPG replacements, pulse effective voltage (PEV), IPG model, pre-/postoperative imaging, and clinical outcome based on the clinical global impression (CGI) scale were collected from the medical charts and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The average IPG longevity was extended for the short PWs (1,129 ± 50 days) compared to the long PW (925 ± 32 days; χ2 = 12.31, p = 0.0005, log-rank test). IPG longevity correlated inversely with PEV (Pearson's r = -0.667, p < 0.0001). IPG longevities did not differ between Kinetra® and Activa® PC in the short (p = 0.319) or long PW group (p = 0.858). Electrode distances to the central sensorimotor region of the GPi did not differ between the short or long PW groups (p = 0.595). Pre- and postoperative CGI did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Short PWs were associated with decreased energy consumption and increased IPG longevity. These effects were not dependent on the IPG model or the anatomic location of the electrodes. PWs did not correlate with symptom severities or clinical outcomes. The results suggest that the use of short PWs might be more energy efficient and could therefore be preferred initially when programming patients with GPi DBS for dystonia.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Dystonia/diagnostic imaging , Dystonia/therapy , Electrodes, Implanted , Globus Pallidus/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Electrodes, Implanted/trends , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
16.
Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem ; 20(2): 88-102, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32628600

ABSTRACT

A vast advancement has been made in the treatment related to central nervous system disorders especially Parkinson's disease. The development in therapeutics and a better understanding of the targets results in upsurge of many promising therapies for Parkinson's disease. Parkinson's disease is defined by neuronal degeneration and neuroinflammation and it is reported that the presence of the neurofibrillary aggregates such as Lewy bodies is considered as the marker. Along with this, it is also characterized by the presence of motor and non-motor symptoms, as seen in Parkinsonian patients. A lot of treatment options mainly focus on prophylactic measures or the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease. Neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration are the point of interest which can be exploited as a new target to emphasis on Parkinson's disease. A thorough study of these targets helps in modifications of those molecules which are particularly involved in causing the neuronal degeneration and neuroinflammation in Parkinson's disease. A lot of drug regimens are available for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, although levodopa remains the choice of drug for controlling the symptoms, yet is accompanied with significant snags. It is always suggested to use other drug therapies concomitantly with levodopa. A number of significant causes and therapeutic targets for Parkinson's disease have been identified in the last decade, here an attempt was made to highlight the most significant of them. It was also found that the treatment regimen and involvement of therapies are totally dependent on individuals and can be tailored to the needs of each individual patient.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Exercise Therapy/methods , Inflammation Mediators/metabolism , Parkinson Disease/therapy , alpha-Synuclein/antagonists & inhibitors , Animals , Antiparkinson Agents/pharmacology , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Exercise Therapy/trends , Humans , Inflammation Mediators/antagonists & inhibitors , Lewy Bodies/drug effects , Lewy Bodies/metabolism , Lewy Bodies/pathology , Parkinson Disease/metabolism , Parkinson Disease/pathology , Treatment Outcome , alpha-Synuclein/metabolism
17.
Epilepsy Behav ; 111: 107200, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32544701

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Media coverage of disorders and medical advancements can impact public perception regarding the riskiness, effectiveness, and accessibility of treatment options. We studied that coverage for epilepsy with a focus on surgical interventions and emerging neurotechnologies. METHODS: Epilepsy-related English language articles published through 2019 were retrieved from online International news media with a circulation of 80,000 or above. We used directed content analysis of news articles to code content into a priori categories both to identify salient themes and to characterize their valence. RESULTS: One hundred forty-six unique articles matched our search terms. Overall, there was a steady increase in epilepsy reporting over time, with a majority of articles published with a positive tone. Neuromodulation was the focus of over 50% of all the articles in the time points analyzed. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and deep-brain stimulation (DBS) were discussed more prominently than other types of neurotechnological interventions; VNS was the neurotechnological focus in 39% of the pediatric articles; resective surgery was the focus in 34% of adult articles. Access, support, and epilepsy literacy were the central themes in the context of ethical, legal, and social issues. SIGNIFICANCE: News media can influence the trust that the public places in science and medicine, and by extension, influences health policy. As innovations in neurotechnology for epilepsy emerge, understanding of individual and societal values is essential to their beneficial evolution and translation to care.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Epilepsy/therapy , Health Literacy/trends , Health Policy/trends , Mass Media/trends , Vagus Nerve Stimulation/trends , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Female , Health Literacy/methods , Humans , Male , Vagus Nerve Stimulation/methods
18.
Arq. bras. neurocir ; 39(2): 116-124, 15/06/2020.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1362499

ABSTRACT

Substance-related disorders are psychiatric conditions that have a worldwide impact. Their multifactorial cycle has been treated pharmacologically and with therapeutic support. However, high refractoriness rates and difficulty to control relapses are among the pitfalls associated with these disorders. Thus, recent studies have shown that deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising treatment, with a direct intervention in the neurocircuitry of addiction. The results of the present systematic review of the use of DBS for the treatment of drug addiction show that this surgical procedure can reduce the desire for the drug, and, in some cases, establish abstinence, improve psychiatric symptoms related to mood and quality of life, and reintroduce the patient into the social and family environments. Nevertheless, this approach is still limited to the academic realm, based mainly on case reports, with ethics and therapeutic protocols still to be defined. Further in-depth scientific investigations are required to recommend its clinical application.


Subject(s)
Substance-Related Disorders/surgery , Substance-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Recurrence , Brain/surgery
19.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg ; 98(4): 270-277, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32434201

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a safe and effective therapy for refractory Tourette syndrome (TS). Recent studies have identified several neural targets as effective in reducing TS symptoms with DBS, but, to our knowledge, none has compared the effectiveness of DBS with conservative therapy. METHODS: A literature review was performed to identify studies investigating adult patient outcomes reported as Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) scores after DBS surgery, pharmacotherapy, and psychotherapy. Data were pooled using a random-effects model of inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis (n = 168 for DBS, n = 131 for medications, and n = 154 for behavioral therapy). RESULTS: DBS resulted in a significantly greater reduction in YGTSS total score (49.9 ± 17.5%) than pharmacotherapy (22.5 ± 15.2%, p = 0.001) or psychotherapy (20.0 ± 11.3%, p < 0.001), with a complication (adverse effect) rate of 0.15/case, 1.13/case, and 0.60/case, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that adult patients with refractory TS undergoing DBS experience greater symptomatic improvement with surprisingly low morbidity than can be obtained with pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy.


Subject(s)
Conservative Treatment/methods , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Tourette Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Tourette Syndrome/therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Conservative Treatment/trends , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Humans , Treatment Outcome
20.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 142(2): 91-107, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32353166

ABSTRACT

Seizure freedom is recognized as the goal of epilepsy treatment by patients, families, and in treatment guidelines and is associated with notably improved quality of life. However, many studies of epilepsy treatments (including antiseizure medications/antiepileptic drugs, neurostimulation, and dietary therapies) fail to report data on seizure freedom. Even among studies that include this outcome, methods for defining and analyzing seizure freedom vary considerably. Thus, the available data are often difficult to interpret and comparisons between studies are particularly challenging. Although these issues had been identified over a decade ago, there remains a lack of clarity and standardized methods used in analyzing and reporting seizure freedom outcomes in studies of epilepsy treatments. In addition, it remains unclear whether short-term seizure freedom outcomes from pivotal clinical trials are predictive of longer-term seizure freedom outcomes for patients with treatment-refractory epilepsy. Ultimately, the limitations of the available data lead to the potential for misinterpretation and misunderstanding of seizure freedom outcomes associated with the spectrum of available treatments when examining treatment options for patients. Clearly defined outcome analyses of seizure freedom attainment and duration are essential in future clinical studies of treatment for seizures to guide treatment selection and modification for patients.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Epilepsy/therapy , Seizures/diagnosis , Seizures/therapy , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/diagnosis , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/psychology , Epilepsy/psychology , Humans , Implantable Neurostimulators/trends , Quality of Life/psychology , Retrospective Studies , Seizures/psychology , Treatment Outcome , Vagus Nerve Stimulation/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...