Mejora progresiva de los umbrales de captura auricular y ventricular, detección e impedancias en los cables de estimulación epicárdica en adultos jóvenes que se someten a conversión de Fontan. / Progressive improvement of atrial and ventricular capture thresholds, sensing, and impedances in epicardial pacing leads in young adults undergoing Fontan conversion.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with univentricular hearts who require permanent pacing systems typically require placement of epicardial leads. It is frequently difficult to find a position with good thresholds due to epimyocardial fibrosis or fat. The goal of the study is to assess the progression of capture thresholds (CT), sensing parameters (P waves and R waves), and impedances (imp) of steroid eluting epicardial pacing leads in young adults who underwent Fontan conversion and a pacemaker implant. METHODS: All patients undergoing Fontan conversion in two institutions were retrospectively identified. Demographic data, congenital heart defects, pacing leads used, and pacing parameters were analyzed at implant, at 6 weeks and 12 months after implant. RESULTS: Twenty patients were identified (twelve males); mean age at conversion was 24.9 ± 5.4 years (range 18-35). Epicardial bipolar steroid eluting leads were used. The site of implant both in the atria and the ventricles varied depending on the parameters. At implant, mean atrial and ventricular impedances were 617 ± 171 Ω and 1061 ± 771 Ω, respectively, mean P wave amplitude was 2 ± 0.7 mV, and mean R wave amplitude was 12.5 ± 7.7 mV. Mean CT was 1.7 ± 0.8 V at 0.5 ms for the atrium and 2.2 ± 1.2 V at 0.5 ms for the ventricle. Ventricular CT and impedance showed an improvement within the first 12 months after implant, with four patients having a decrease in threshold of more than 2 V. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing Fontan conversion, implant ventricular CT and impedances are frequently higher than expected but typically improve during follow-up. Acceptance of higher initial threshold values may be a potential strategy in this patient population.

OBJETIVO: Los pacientes con corazón univentricular que requieren estimulación cardíaca reciben sistemas de estimulación epicárdicos. Debido a la presencia de fibrosis o grasa epi-miocárdica es dificultoso en esta población encontrar sitios con adecuados parámetros de estimulación. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar la progresión de los umbrales de captura, los parámetros de sensado (medición de las ondas P y R) e impedancias (imp) de los catéteres epicárdicos con liberación de esteroides implantados en adultos jóvenes sometidos a cirugía de reconversión de Fontan e implante de marcapasos. MÉTODOS: Los pacientes sometidos a cirugía de reconversión de Fontan en dos instituciones fueron analizados retrospectivamente. Los datos demográficos, el tipo de cardiopatía congénita, de catéteres de estimulación y los parámetros de estimulación fueron analizados al momento del implante, a las 6 semanas y al año. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 20 pacientes (12 de ellos de sexo masculino); la edad media al momento de la reconversión fue de 24.9 ± 5.4 años (rango 18-35). Se utilizaron catéteres epicárdicos bipolares de fijación pasiva y con liberación de esteroides en todos los casos. El sitio de implante en las aurículas y en los ventrículos fue variable de acuerdo a los parámetros. En el momento del implante las impedancias medias fueron 617 ± 171 W y 1061 ± 771 W respectivamente, la amplitud media de la onda P fue 2 ± 0.7 mV y la media de amplitud de la onda R fue de 12.5 ± 7.7 mV. Las medias de los umbrales de captura fueron 1.7 ± 0.8 V at 0.5 ms para los catéteres auriculares y 2.2 ± 1.2 V at 0.5 ms para los ventriculares. Los umbrales de captura y las impedancias ventriculares mostraron una mejoría en los 12 meses posteriores al implante, y en 4 pacientes esa mejoría en el umbral de captura ventricular fue mayor a 2 V. CONCLUSIONES: En pacientes sometidos a una cirugía de reconversión de Fontan e implante de marcapasos, los umbrales de captura e impedancias ventriculares son más elevados que los esperados, pero mejoran durante el seguimiento. La aceptación de valores más elevados puede potencialmente constituir una alternativa en esta población de pacientes.

Management of Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices in Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Ablation for Spine Pain: Physician Survey and Review of Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: More patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs) are presenting to spine and pain practices for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) procedures for chronic pain. Although the potential for electromagnetic interference (EMI) affecting CIED function is known with RFA procedures, available guidelines do not specifically address CIED management for percutaneous RFA for zygapophyseal (z-joint) joint pain, and thus physician practice may vary. OBJECTIVES: To better understand current practices of physicians who perform RFA for chronic z-joint pain with respect to management of CIEDs. Perioperative CIED management guidelines are also reviewed to specifically address risk mitigation strategies for potential EMI created by ambulatory percutaneous spine RFA procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Web-based provider survey and narrative review. SETTING: Multispecialty pain clinic, academic medical center. METHODS: A web-based survey was created using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). A survey link was provided via e-mail to active members of the Spine Intervention Society (SIS), American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, as well as distributed freely to community Pain Physicians and any receptive academic departments of PM&R or Anesthesiology. The narrative review summarizes pertinent case series, review articles, a SIS recommendation statement, and multi-specialty peri-operative guidelines as they relate specifically to spine RFA procedures. RESULTS: A total of 197 clinicians participated in the survey from diverse clinical backgrounds, including anesthesiology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, radiology, neurosurgery, and neurology, with 81% reporting fellowship training. Survey responses indicate wide variability in provider management of CIEDs before, during, and after RFA for z-joint pain. Respondents indicated they would like more specific guidelines to aid in management and decision-making around CIEDs and spine RFA procedures. Literature review yielded several practice guidelines related to perioperative management of CIEDs, but no specific guideline for percutaneous spine RFA procedures. However, combining the risk mitigation strategies provided in these guidelines, with interventional pain physician clinical experience allows for reasonable management recommendations to aid in decision-making. LIMITATIONS: Although this manuscript can serve as a review of CIEDs and aid in management decisions in patients with CIEDs, it is not a clinical practice guideline. CONCLUSIONS: Practice patterns vary regarding CIED management in ambulatory spine RFA procedures. CIED presence is not a contraindication for spine RFA but does increase the complexity of a spine RFA procedure and necessitates some added precautions. KEY WORDS: Radiofrequency ablation, neurotomy, cardiac implantable electrical device, zygapophyseal joint, spondylosis, neck pain, low back pain, chronic pain.

Optimal Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Programming.

Optimal programming of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is essential to appropriately treat ventricular tachyarrhythmias and to avoid unnecessary and inappropriate shocks. There have been a series of large clinical trials evaluating tailored programming of ICDs. We reviewed the clinical trials evaluating ICD therapies and detection, and the consensus statement on ICD programming. In doing so, we found that prolonged ICD detection times, higher rate cutoffs, and antitachycardia pacing (ATP) programming decreases inappropriate and painful therapies in a primary prevention population. The use of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia discriminators can also decrease inappropriate shocks. Tailored ICD programming using the knowledge gained from recent ICD trials can decrease inappropriate and unnecessary ICD therapies and decrease mortality.

Lack of current implantable cardioverter defibrillator guidelines application for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in Latin American patients with heart failure: a cross-sectional study.

AIMS: This cross-sectional study evaluated the application of accepted international implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) guidelines for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: The PLASMA (Probabilidad de Sufrir Muerte Arritmica) study was designed to characterize management of cardiac patients in Latin America. Twelve centres included 1958 consecutively admitted patients in cardiology units in 2008 and 2009. Discharged patients were evaluated for primary prevention, ICD indication and prescription by general cardiologists. Of 1711 discharged patients, 1525 (89%) had data available for evaluating indication status. Class I indications for ICD therapy were met for 153 (10%) patients based on collected data. Only 20 (13%, 95% confidence interval: 7.7-18.4%) patients with indication were prescribed an ICD. Patients prescribed an ICD were younger than patients who were not prescribed an ICD (62 vs. 68 years, P < 0.01). The reasons given by cardiologists for not prescribing an ICD for 133 patients with an indication were: indication criteria not met (75%), life expectancy <1 year (9.7%), rejection by the patient (5.2%), no medical coverage paying for the device (3.7%), psychiatric patient (2.2%), and other reasons (4.2%). CONCLUSIONS: In Latin America, international guidelines for primary prevention ICD implantation are not well followed. The main reason is that cardiologists believe that patients do not meet indication criteria, even though study data confirm that criteria are met. This poses a significant challenge and underlines the importance of continuous and improved medical education.

ISHNE/EHRA expert consensus on remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs).

We are in the midst of a rapidly evolving era of technology-assisted medicine. The field of telemedicine provides the opportunity for highly individualized medical management in a way that has never been possible before. Evolving medical technologies using cardiac implantable devices (CIEDs) with capabilities for remote monitoring permit evaluation of multiple parameters of cardiovascular physiology and risk, including cardiac rhythm, device function, blood pressure values, the presence of myocardial ischaemia, and the degree of compensation of congestive heart failure. Cardiac risk, device status, and response to therapies can now be assessed with these electronic systems of detection and reporting. This document reflects the extensive experience from investigators and innovators around the world who are shaping the evolution of this rapidly expanding field, focusing in particular on implantable pacemakers (IPGs), implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), devices for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) (both, with and without defibrillation properties), loop recorders, and haemodynamic monitoring devices. This document covers the basic methodologies, guidelines for their use, experience with existing applications, and the legal and reimbursement aspects associated with their use. To adequately cover this important emerging topic, the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology (ISHNE) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) combined their expertise in this field. We hope that the development of this field can contribute to improve care of our cardiovascular patients.

Estudo multicêntrico de pacientes submetidos a implante de cardioversor-desfibrilador implantável (CDI) na America Latina / Multi-center study of patients who underwent implants of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in Latin America / Estudio multicéntrico de pacientes sometidos a implante de cardioversor-desfibrilador implantable(CDI) en Latinoamérica

O ICD Register da Medtronic foi introduzido na América Latina com a finalidade de coletar dados relacionados à indicação de implantes de CDI para prevenção primária e secundária de morte súbita e ao acompanhamento de pacientes originários de Porto Rico, Caribe. México e América do Sul. Além dessa ampla variedade geográfica, também foram incluídos detalhes referentes aos cuidados de saúde recebidos como parte do tratamento. O presente estudo apresenta as características de desfecho de 910 portadores de cardiopatias tratados para prevenção primária, em comparação com aqueles nos quais o implante destinou-se à prevenção secundária.

The ICD Register was introduced to Latin America to collect data related to implant indication of ICD for the prevention of primary and secondary deaths and for the follow-up of patients from Puerto Rico, the Caribbean, Mexico and South America. In addition to this vast geographic variety, information related to the health care as part of the treatment has also been included. This study shows the characteristics of the outcome of 910 cardiopathy patients treated for primary prevention, incomparison to those whose implants were meant for secondary prevention.

El ICD Register de Medtronic fue introducido en América Latina a fin de recoger datos relacionados a la indicación de implantes de CDI para la prevención primaria y secundaria de muerte súbita y a la remisión de pacientes provenientes de Puerto Rico, Caribe, México y Sudamérica. Ademásde esa amplia variedad geográfica, también se incluyeron detalles referentes a los cuidados de saludrecibidos como parte del tratamiento. El presente estudio presenta las características de solución de 910 portadores de cardiopatías tratados para la prevención primaria, en comparación con aquellos cuyo implante se destinó a la prevención secundaria.

ICD patients with elevated defibrillation threshold: clinical behavior and therapeutic alternatives.

BACKGROUND: The ideal programming of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shock energy should be at least 10J above the defibrillation threshold (DFT), requiring alternative techniques when the DFT is elevated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical behavior of ICD patients with DFT>25J and the efficacy of the chosen therapy. METHODS: Patients who had undergone ICD implantation between Jan/00 and Aug/04 (prospective database) and presented intraoperative DFT>25J were selected. The analyzed variables were: clinical characteristics, LVEF, rescue of arrhythmic events from ICD and causes of deaths. RESULTS: among 476 patients, 16 (3.36%) presented DFT>25J. The mean age was 56.5 years, and 13 patients (81%) were men. According to the baseline cardiomyopathy, 09 patients had Chagas' disease, 04 had ischemic cardiomyopathy and 03 had idiopathic cardiomyopathy. Mean LVEF was 0.37 and amiodarone was used by 94% of the patients. Mean follow-up (FU) period was 25.3 months. DFT was higher than maximum energy shock (MES) in 2 patients and it was necessary to implant an additional shock electrode (array). It was programmed MES in ventricular fibrillation zone of ICD therapy in the other patients. In the FU, 03 patients had 67 successful appropriate shock therapies (AST). There were 05 noncardiac and 02 heart failure deaths. The patients who died showed higher DFT levels (p=0.044) without correlation with death because there wasn't unsuccessful AST. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of ICD patients, the occurrence of elevated DFT (>25J) was low, leading to alternative therapies. There was an association with severe ventricular dysfunction, although without correlation to the causes of death.

Portadores de CDI com limiar de desfibrilação elevado: evolução clínica e alternativas terapêuticas / ICD patients with elevated defibrillation threshold: clinical behavior and therapeutic alternatives

FUNDAMENTO: A programação ideal da energia de choque do CDI deve ser pelo menos 10 J acima do limiar de desfibrilação (LDF), necessitando de técnicas alternativas quando o LDF é elevado. OBJETIVO: Avaliar o comportamento clínico dos portadores de CDI com LDF>25 J e a eficácia da terapêutica escolhida. MÉTODOS: Foram selecionados portadores de CDI, entre janeiro de 2000 e agosto de 2004 (banco de dados prospectivo), com LDF>25 J intra-operatório, e analisaram-se: características clínicas, FEVE, resgate de eventos arrítmicos pelo CDI e óbitos. RESULTADOS: dentre 476 pacientes, 16 (3,36 por cento) apresentaram LDF>25J. Idade média de 56,5 anos, sendo 13 pacientes (81 por cento) do sexo masculino. Quanto à cardiopatia de base 09 eram chagásicos, 04 isquêmicos e 03 com etiologia idiopática. A FEVE média dos pacientes foi 37 por cento e 94 por cento utilizavam amiodarona. O seguimento médio foi de 25,3 meses. Em 02 pacientes com LDF > Choque Máximo (CM), foi necessário implante de eletrodo de choque adicional (array), sendo mantido programação com CM em zona de FV (>182bpm) nos demais. Durante o seguimento 03 pacientes apresentaram 67 terapias de choque apropriadas (TCA) com sucesso. Ocorreram 07 óbitos sendo 5 por causas não cardíacas e 2 por insuficiência cardíaca avançada. Os pacientes que foram a óbito apresentaram níveis de LDF maiores (p=0,0446), entretanto sem relação com a causa dos mesmos tendo em vista que não ocorreram TCA sem sucesso. CONCLUSÃO: Nessa coorte de pacientes com CDI, a ocorrência de LDF elevado foi baixa, implicando terapêuticas alternativas. Houve associação com disfunção ventricular grave, entretanto sem correlação com as causas de óbito.

BACKGROUND: The ideal programming of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shock energy should be at least 10J above the defibrillation threshold (DFT), requiring alternative techniques when the DFT is elevated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical behavior of ICD patients with DFT>25J and the efficacy of the chosen therapy. METHODS: Patients who had undergone ICD implantation between Jan/00 and Aug/04 (prospective database) and presented intraoperative DFT>25J were selected. The analyzed variables were: clinical characteristics, LVEF, rescue of arrhythmic events from ICD and causes of deaths. RESULTS: among 476 patients, 16 (3.36 percent) presented DFT>25J. The mean age was 56.5 years, and 13 patients (81 percent) were men. According to the baseline cardiomyopathy, 09 patients had Chagas' disease, 04 had ischemic cardiomyopathy and 03 had idiopathic cardiomyopathy. Mean LVEF was 0.37 and amiodarone was used by 94 percent of the patients. Mean follow-up (FU) period was 25.3 months. DFT was higher than maximum energy shock (MES) in 2 patients and it was necessary to implant an additional shock electrode (array). It was programmed MES in ventricular fibrillation zone of ICD therapy in the other patients. In the FU, 03 patients had 67 successful appropriate shock therapies (AST). There were 05 noncardiac and 02 heart failure deaths. The patients who died showed higher DFT levels (p=0.044) without correlation with death because there wasn't unsuccessful AST. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of ICD patients, the occurrence of elevated DFT (>25J) was low, leading to alternative therapies. There was an association with severe ventricular dysfunction, although without correlation to the causes of death.