Comparison of stress distribution in partially and completely edentulous mandibles around splinted and non-splinted implant prostheses: A finite element study.

BACKGROUND: In some treatments using multiple dental implants, the implants are inserted in the bone with splinted or non-splinted implant prostheses. There are some reports about the influence of the splinted and non-splinted implants on stress distribution in the bone using the finite element method (FEM), and there is a controversy in the literature regarding whether the splinted or non-splinted implants prostheses reduce the stress generated on the implant-surrounding bone more efficiently. Additionally, the simple shape of the jaw bones with limited bone area was used for FEM analysis in many studies at the expense of accurate analysis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in stress distribution in the bone between the splinted and non-splinted implants, and between completely and partially edentulous mandibles. METHODS: The implants were inserted in the first premolar, second premolar, and first molar regions of the partial and complete mandibles, and the splinted and non-splinted crowns were attached to the implants. Vertical load (100 N) or oblique load (70 N, 30° from its long axis towards the lingual) was applied on the first premolar. RESULTS: When vertical load was applied to the partially edentulous mandible model, the stress was concentrated intensively on the cortical bone around the first premolar regardless of whether splinted or non-splinted implants were used. On the other hand, the vertical load applied to the completely edentulous mandible model caused the stress to be concentrated intensively on the cortical bone around the first premolar with non-splinted implants. With respect to the oblique load, the stress was concentrated intensively on the cortical bone around the first premolar only with the non-splinted implants, in both the partial and complete mandibles. CONCLUSION: This study shows the different stress distributions of the cortical bone around the implants between the partial and complete mandible. This indicates that the complete mandible should be used for the analysis of bone stress distribution around the implants using FEM.

In vitro assessment of connection strength and stability of internal implant-abutment connections.

BACKGROUND: Various connections have been machined to improve the fit between the dental abutment and implant. In vivo, the instability created by imprecisely fitting components can cause soft tissue irritation and bacterial colonization of the implant system. The aim of this study was to quantify abutment stability under in vitro force applications. METHODS: Abutment stability and fit were quantitatively measured after application of rotational, vertical, and horizontal forces. FINDINGS: The abutment connection held by friction (Friction-Fit) was the only group to have 0° angular rotation. A significantly greater vertical force was required to pull the abutment from the implant for the Friction-Fit connection as compared to all other experimental groups. The abutment connection held by a mechanically locking friction-fit with four grooves (CrossFit) and Friction-Fit demonstrated significantly lower lateral movement as compared to all other connections. The remaining connections evaluated included two hexagon connections that rely on screw placement for abutment fit (Conical + Hex #1 and Conical + Hex #2), one connection with protruding slots to align with recessed channels inside the implant (Conical + 6 Indexing Slots), and an internal connection that allows for abutment indexing every 120° (Internal Tri-Channel). INTERPRETATION: Internal connection geometry influenced the degree of abutment movement. Friction-Fit and CrossFit connections exhibited the lowest rotational and horizontal motions. Significant differences were found between Friction-Fit and CrossFit following the application of a vertical force, with the Friction-Fit requiring a significantly greater pull force to separate the abutment from the implant.

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Maxillary Edentulous Patients Wearing Overdentures Retained by Two Implants from Insertion to 4 Years.

PURPOSE: This cohort study evaluated patient satisfaction for maxillary implant-retained overdentures (IODs) on two implants up to 4 years and assessed the treatment effect over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients encountering problems with their conventional dentures were included and received maxillary IODs on two titanium-zirconium implants and ball anchors in the canine area. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the oral health impact profile (OHIP-20E) questionnaires both for dentures and IODs. Two months after insertion of IODs (baseline), the patients chose the preferred overdenture design with full or reduced palatal coverage. OHIP-20E questionnaires were followed according to the individual choice at 1 and 4 years, and outcomes were compared with baseline. RESULTS: Sixteen out of 21 patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 4 years (range: 2.4 to 4.8 years). There was no significant difference in the OHIP domains for IODs at 1 year (OHIP_total_1y: 9.5, SD: 13.0) and 4 years (OHIP_total_4y: 14.2, SD: 19.1) compared with baseline (OHIP_total_BL: 12.4, SD: 14.7). Patients were most satisfied with social disability both for IODs (OHIP_BL: 6.0, SD: 7.6; OHIP_1y: 3.4, SD: 5.4; OHIP_4y: 5.7, SD: 9.5) and dentures (OHIP_CD_old: 28, SD: 29.7; OHIP_CD_new: 25.4, SD: 28.67). Patients were least satisfied with functional limitation both for IODs (OHIP_BL: 6.0, SD: 7.6; OHIP_1y: 3.4, SD: 5.4; OHIP_4y: 5.7, SD: 9.5) and dentures (OHIP_CD_old: 28, SD: 29.7; OHIP_CD_new: 25.4, SD: 28.67). CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with maxillary IODs on two implants did not change from baseline to 4 years and was high at 4 years of function.

Implant Prosthodontic Discrepancy of Complete-Arch Co-Cr Implant Frameworks Manufactured Through Selective Laser Melting Additive Manufacturing Technology Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine.

PURPOSE: The objective was to measure the implant prosthodontic discrepancy of complete-arch implant-supported frameworks made of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) fabricated using selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing technologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A completely edentulous maxillary cast with seven implant replicas was obtained. Co-Cr SLM frameworks (n = 9) from three different providers (SLM-1, SLM-2, SLM-3) were manufactured. A coordinate measuring machine was selected to measure the implant prosthodontic discrepancy (µm) on the x-, y-, and z-axis and the 3D gap (3D = √x2+ y2+z2) where implants were considered as the statistical unit (n = 7). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Student-Newman-Keuls, and Tukey tests were used to analyze the data (α = .05). RESULTS: The mean 3D implant prosthodontic discrepancy (µm) was higher for SLM-1 (73.77 ± 27.94) than for SLM-2 (47.54 ± 22.63) and SLM-3 (47.26 ± 22.57). At the x-axis, SLM-2 showed a significantly smaller gap (16.21 ± 9.6) than SLM-3 (32.92 ± 27.77) and SLM-1 (34.77 ± 21.85). At the y-axis, however, SLM-3 presented a significantly smaller gap (27.97 ± 9.49) than SLM-2 (38.84 ± 27.82) and SLM-1 (54.35 ± 29.89). Similarly, at the z-axis, SLM-3 (4.01 ± 2.29) showed the least gap, followed by SLM-2 (9.09 ± 7.63), being significantly smaller than that of SLM-1 (16.14 ± 21.09). CONCLUSION: The three SLM additive manufacturing technologies tested showed implant prosthodontic discrepancies ranging from 4.01 to 54.35 µm, which could be considered in the clinically acceptable range. Distortion at the z-axis was significantly less compared to x- and y-axes in all the groups tested.

Ten-year clinical outcome of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures-A prospective pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective pilot study was to evaluate the concept of one single implant placed in the edentulous mandible to retain a complete denture with regard to implant survival and prosthodontic maintenance over an observation period of 10 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven edentulous patients were included and received one implant in the midline of the mandible. Five implants healed submerge and were uncovered 2 months later. The other six healed un-submerged and were provided with a healing abutment 4 mm in height thus moderately loaded. All denture bases were temporarily relined during the healing period and two months later provided with a ball attachment for implant retention. Implant related parameters and prosthodontic maintenance interventions were assessed four weeks after implant loading and then annually. RESULTS: Over a mean observation period of 108.9 months (35-136 months), no implant was lost. The most frequent prosthetic maintenance intervention was activation of the matrix due to loss of retention, followed by exchange of the female part. Fracture of the denture base in the attachment area was a frequent complication and occurred in 8 cases. Two denture bases fractured twice. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this prospective pilot study, the concept of a single midline implant to retain a mandibular complete denture is promising over ten years for edentulous patients. Regular recall visits should be scheduled due to frequent maintenance interventions. Further research on this topic with a larger study cohort is needed.

Implant placement for patients with cleft lip and palate: A clinical report and guidelines for treatment.

The multidisciplinary teams involved in the treatment of individuals with cleft lip and palate are challenged when implants are indicated in the cleft area. Difficulties include obtaining a healthy peri-implant area and, especially, obtaining the natural-looking papilla essential for esthetic success. The area affected by the cleft has a bone deficiency, which is typically augmented with an alveolar bone graft at adolescence. Guidelines for the 3-dimensional placement of implants at the cleft area are presented based on clinical reports. The patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Adoption of the proposed guidelines enables satisfactory esthetic and functional outcomes in patients with cleft lip and palate.

Group 2 ITI Consensus Report: Prosthodontics and implant dentistry.

OBJECTIVES: Working Group 2 was convened to address topics relevant to prosthodontics and dental implants. Systematic reviews were developed according to focused questions addressing (a) the number of implants required to support fixed full-arch restorations, (b) the influence of intentionally tilted implants compared to axial positioned implants when supporting fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), (c) implant placement and loading protocols, (d) zirconia dental implants, (e) zirconia and metal ceramic implant supported single crowns and (f) zirconia and metal ceramic implant supported FDPs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Group 2 considered and discussed information gathered in six systematic reviews. Group participants discussed statements developed by the authors and developed consensus. The group developed and found consensus for clinical recommendations based on both the statements and the experience of the group. The consensus statements and clinical recommendations were presented to the plenary (gathering of all conference attendees) and discussed. Final versions were developed after consensus was reached. RESULTS: A total of 27 consensus statements were developed from the systematic reviews. Additionally, the group developed 24 clinical recommendations based on the combined expertise of the participants and the developed consensus statements. CONCLUSIONS: The literature supports the use of various implant numbers to support full-arch fixed prostheses. The use of intentionally tilted dental implants is indicated when appropriate conditions exist. Implant placement and loading protocols should be considered together when planning and treating patients. One-piece zirconia dental implants can be recommended when appropriate clinical conditions exist although two-piece zirconia implants should be used with caution as a result of insufficient data. Clinical performance of zirconia and metal ceramic single implant supported crowns is similar and each demonstrates significant, though different, complications. Zirconia ceramic FDPs are less reliable than metal ceramic. Implant supported monolithic zirconia prostheses may be a future option with more supporting evidence.

Biomechanical aspects: Summary and consensus statements of group 4. The 5th EAO Consensus Conference 2018.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present publication was to report on the EAO Workshop group-4 discussions and consensus statements on the five reviews previously prepared. These reviews provided the scientific evidence on the effect of crown-to-implant ratio, on reconstructions with cantilevers in fully and partially edentulous patients, on biological and technical complications of tilted in comparison with straight implants, and on the effects of osseointegrated implants functioning in a residual dentition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The group discussed, evaluated, corrected where deemed appropriate, and made recommendations to the authors regarding the following five reviews submitted: (a) Is there an effect of crown-to-implant ratio on implant treatment outcomes?; (b) Implant-supported cantilevered fixed dental rehabilitations in fully edentulous patients; (c) and in partially edentulous patients; (d) Biological and technical complications of tilted implants in comparison with straight implants supporting fixed dental prostheses; (e) What are the adverse effects of osseointegrated implants functioning among natural teeth of a residual dentition? Based on the five manuscripts and the discussion among the group as well as the plenum members, the major findings were summarized, consensus statements were formulated, clinical recommendations were proposed, and areas of future research were identified. RESULTS: Crown-to-implant ratios ranging from 0.9 to 2.2 did not influence the occurrence of biological or technical complications also in single-tooth restorations. Reconstructions with cantilevers for the rehabilitation of fully and partially edentulous jaws showed high implant and reconstruction survival rates. In contrast, the rate of complications-in particular associated with veneering material-was high during the observation period of 5-10 years. The data reported were primarily derived from studies with high risk of bias. The data for single-implant reconstructions were small. There was no evidence that distally tilted implants were associated with higher failure rates and increased amounts of marginal bone loss. The data supporting these findings, however, were at high risk of bias and frequently incompletely reported. Frequent positional changes occurred between the natural teeth and the implant-supported restorations. These changes were more pronounced in younger individuals, and even though they were reduced with age, they still occurred in adult patients. Even though these changes were frequent, potential implications for the patient are unclear. CONCLUSIONS: The use of single-tooth restorations with crown-to-implant ratio in between 0.9 and 2.2 may be considered a viable treatment option. Multiunit reconstructions with cantilevers are a viable treatment option in fully and partially edentulous patients. Clinicians and patients should be aware, however, that complications are frequent and primarily related to resin material used for veneering. There is some evidence that tilting an implant does affect stability of the implant and the surrounding bone. Treatment options to tilted implants should carefully be considered, as the effect on soft tissues and on prosthesis behavior is poorly reported for tilted implants. Positional changes in the dentition in relation to implant-supported restorations occur frequently. The patient should be informed about the possible need for a treatment related to these changes in the long term.

Comparing Retention and Internal Adaptation of Different Implant-Supported, Metal-Free Frameworks.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare the fit and retention of implant-supported, metal-free copings fabricated from zirconia, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), or composite, as well as to evaluate the possible correlation between internal adaptation and retention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 copings were milled from zirconia, PEEK, or composite blanks (n = 12 in each group). Marginal and internal gap were evaluated by replica technique, and the pull-out test was used to evaluate retention. One-way analysis of variance, post hoc Tukey tests, and Pearson correlation coefficient test were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Zirconia had significantly better marginal/internal adaptation (P < .05) than the other materials. There was no statistically significant difference in mean retention force between the different groups (P > .05). No correlation was found between internal adaptation and retention. CONCLUSION: In the metal-free copings tested, zirconia showed the best adaptation. The retention of copings was not influenced by internal fit or material type.

Satisfaction and Patient-Related Outcomes in 128 Patients with Single Implant Crowns In Situ for up to 14 Years.

PURPOSE: To assess patient satisfaction and patient-related outcomes across the domains of appearance, cleansibility, and costs; the perceived value and worth when single implant crowns (SICs) had been in situ up to 14 years; whether satisfaction differed between patients; and whether certain characteristics might affect the questionnaire response rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated at a private prosthodontic practice between 2001 and 2014 (n = 207) who received a SIC (n = 256) were prospectively included. A previously validated patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ) exploring patient-centered outcomes was mailed to participants. Demographic (sex, age) and treatment data (number of SICs, time in situ, failure experience, complication experience) were collected. Visual analog scale (VAS) responses were converted to percentages. Differences between respondents and nonrespondents, differences in satisfaction between prosthesis placement and survey date, and differences with respect to demographic and treatment data were assessed. Averages were medians bounded by interquartile ranges. Statistical significance was set at P = .05. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 128, 61.8%) and nonrespondents (n = 79, 38.2%) had similar demographic and treatment characteristics. Prostheses had been in situ for up to 14 years (median, 5 years; interquartile range [IQR], 24 to 96 months). Participants reported that treatment met their expectations (median, 93%; IQR, 85% to 100%); they reported high satisfaction with tooth color, tooth contour, peri-implant mucosa, appearance overall, and ease of cleaning (medians ranging from 90.5% to 95%, IQR ranging from 80% to 100%) and medium satisfaction with costs when prostheses were placed (median, 50%; IQR, 29% to 80%). Satisfaction with tooth contour, peri-implant tissues, overall appearance, and costs significantly improved over time (96%, 92.5%, 91.7%, and 75%, respectively; P < .001 to P = .049). Levels of satisfaction did not differ by sex, number of implants, survival, complications, number of complications, and time in situ. Younger patients were less satisfied with the overall appearance and costs than older patients (P = .004, P = .007, respectively). All patients would choose to undergo treatment again and would recommend it to a friend. CONCLUSION: Patients with SICs that were in situ up to 14 years who responded to the validated PSQ were highly satisfied with the appearance and cleansibility, noted improvements in peri-implant tissue contours, and found the treatment to be valuable and worthwhile. They reported that upfront costs were high, but this concern decreased when the SICs had been in the mouth for a period of time.

Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Mandibular Complete Denture Using Different Cantilever Lengths and Occlusal Coating Materials.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess stress distribution in the bone-implant interface of a mandibular implant-supported prosthesis with different cantilever lengths, aesthetic coating materials, and implant abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A photoelastic model of an edentulous mandible, containing 5 external hexagon implants, was constructed. Experimental models were divided into 6 groups: group 1-UCLA component and metal bar; group 2-UCLA component and acrylic resin coating; group 3-UCLA component and porcelain coating; group 4-abutment and metal bar; group 5-abutment and acrylic resin coating; and group 6-abutment and porcelain coating. Forces were applied to the most anterior implant, the most posterior implant, and different cantilever lengths. RESULTS: The results showed a higher number of high-stress fringes as the cantilever length increased. Fringes were better distributed in groups with prostheses composed of acrylic resin and in groups that contained an abutment. CONCLUSION: The stress distribution in the bone-implant interface is improved when the cantilever is eliminated and when abutments in an acrylic resin prosthesis are used.

Consequences of experience and specialist training on the fabrication of implant-supported prostheses: A survey.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Fabricating fixed restorations on implants requires that dentists stay up-to-date with the scientific publications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire containing 29 questions was sent to dentists, members of the Israeli Society of Prosthodontics, and university faculty members. Differences were evaluated using the chi-square and Fisher exact tests and Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests for questions enquiring into the frequency of use of certain methods (α=.05). RESULTS: A total of 155 questionnaires were completed by 84 general dental practitioners and 71 specialists and residents. Statistical differences (P<.05) were found in the course of the fabrication of the implant-supported prostheses in the diagnostic waxing, trial restoration, and impression-making processes. Trial restorations were often used by residents and specialists before starting an esthetic restoration. Diagnostic waxing was used when treating patients with complex esthetic needs, mainly by prosthodontists (P=.019). A custom tray for impression making was used more by residents and specialists than by general dental practitioners (P<.001). The open tray technique for impression making of single or up to 3 implants was performed mainly by residents, specialists, and general dental practitioners with professional experience of fewer than 15 years. General dental practitioners used primarily plastic or metal trays for impression making. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly, impression techniques and the use of custom open trays, diagnostic waxing, and trial restorations were performed by residents, specialists, and dentists with fewer than 15 years of experience.

A Two-Year Evaluation of a Sloped Marginal Contour Implant System Placed in Healed Sites.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the survival rate, bone remodeling, and soft tissue health around sloped marginal contour implants when placed in healed sites posteriorly in the mouth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Implants were placed in healed sites at premolar and molar regions. After a 3-month osseointegration period, definitive prostheses were connected. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed at implant placement and then 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after implant placement. An assessment of implant stability, peri-implant mucosa, level of attached gingivae, occlusion, proximal contact, and marginal bone levels was performed at each respective visit. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were treated and restored with 18 single crowns. The cumulative survival rate was 100% after 2 years. The mean marginal bone remodeling was 0.04 ± 0.26 mm (n = 18). The attached gingival change was +0.33 ± 0.35 mm. CONCLUSION: The 24-month results indicate that the sloped marginal contour implant performed well in posterior healed sites with a 100% survival rate and good marginal bone maintenance.

The Survival of Morse Cone-Connection Implants with Platform Switch.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the survival up to 5 years of Morse cone-connection implants with platform switch considering the influence of biologically relevant, anatomical, and stress-related variables. STROBE guidelines were followed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven hundred forty-eight implants were inserted in 350 patients. Follow-up visits were scheduled at the time of stagetwo surgery (2 months later) and at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months. All implants were initially loaded with a cemented provisional acrylic restoration. The definitive metal-ceramic restorations were cemented at the 6-month follow-up. Implant cumulative survival rates (CSRs) were calculated using life table actuarial method. Survival data were also analyzed by the log-rank test and Cox regression. The statistical analysis was conducted at the patient level. P ≤ .05 was considered as an indicator of statistical significance. RESULTS: During the follow-up (mean: 40 months; SD: 20.27), 28 patients were considered failed (8%). The CSR and its standard error (SE) was 92% ± 2.17%. Patients with implant-supported single crowns had a CSR of 90%, whereas those with implant-supported fixed dental prostheses had a CSR of 93%. The implant diameter (P = .0399) and implant length (P = .0441) were statistically significant. The probability of failure was almost 75% lower for patients with wide rather than standard implants, 91% lower for patients with long implants, and 69% lower for patients with standard implants compared with short implants. CONCLUSION: The use of Morse cone-connection implants with platform switch is a safe and reliable treatment method. Stress-related variables influence the risk of failure confirming the importance of biomechanical factors in the longevity of osseointegrated implants; thus, the clinician may obtain better results if attention is paid to these factors.

Fracture Resistance of Monolithic High Translucency Zirconia Implant-Supported Crowns.

AIM: To evaluate the resistance to axial forces of screw-retained monolithic high translucency zirconia (mHTZr) crowns compared with high translucency zirconia + feldspathic ceramic (HTZrC) crowns, low translucency zirconia + feldspathic ceramic (LTZrC) crowns, and metal-ceramic (MC) crowns, and also to observe the different fracture patterns between all groups. METHODS: Twenty-four crowns were fabricated (6 of each group) and loaded until failure, using a testing machine with a 5.0-kN load cell. RESULTS: Mean fracture results varied between 1092.7 N (LTZrC group) and 3439.7 N (mHTZr group). No statistically significant differences were found between the HTZrC, LTZrC, and MC groups. However, statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) were found between mHTZr and the other 3 groups. In the MC group, only chipping of the ceramic veneering occurred. In the mHTZr group, when fracturing occurred, it was of the whole structure. Finally, the LTZrC and HTZrC groups suffered both chipping and core fractures. CONCLUSION: High translucency monolithic zirconia implant-supported crowns proved to be the toughest group studied when an axial force was applied. Fracture patterns varied between different materials, chipping being the most common occurrence.

30-Year Outcomes of Dental Implants Supporting Mandibular Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Review of 4 Cases.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to present the 30-year outcomes of 28 implants supporting mandibular screw-retained fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dental charts of the 4 patients were carefully reviewed, and it was noticed that they received 28 implants and 5 screw-retained FDPs in 1983 and 1984. The chief concerns raised by these patients were poor retention of their complete dentures and decreased masticatory function at the time of treatment planning. Each dental care they received was recorded in the last 30 years. Implant survival, radiographic, and prosthodontic examinations were performed. RESULTS: No implants were lost after 30 years, giving the implant a survival rate of 100%. The average marginal bone level was 2.6 ± 0.5 mm at the last recall appointment. Of the 5 FDPs delivered, 1 needed replacement, indicating a prosthesis survival rate of 80%. The patients needed 21 repairs such as replacement of denture teeth/gold screws and hard relining, and 19 adjustments such as occlusal adjustments and acrylic resin contouring, over 30 years. CONCLUSION: This clinical report shows that machined-surface dental implants can successfully support screw-retained fixed dental prostheses for over 30 years, making dental implants an important dental treatment alternative compared to the traditional prosthetic treatment methods.

[Implant-borne prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with cleft lip and palate: A retrospective study on 43 patients]. / Réhabilitation implanto-portée des patients porteurs de fentes labio-alvéolo-palatines : étude rétrospective sur 43 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Implant-borne rehabilitation in cleft lip and palate patient are aimed to allow for good orofacial functions, stable occlusion, and adequate support for the naso-labial region. The goal of our study was to evaluate the functional and esthetic results of the implant-born dental rehabilitation of the cleft lip and palate patients in our department. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our retrospective study concerned patients operated between 1995 and 2010 in our department. All included patients suffered from a cleft alveolus and lip, with or without cleft palate. Dental implants were placed in the bone-grafted alveolus and the end of growth and at distance from the bone graft procedure. Criteria of implant survival and implant-borne rehabilitation success were defined. RESULTS: A total of 78 implants were placed in 43 patients between 1995 and 2010. Two implants were lost (implant survival rate: 97.4%). Despite this loss, all the patients could be rehabilitated with good functional and esthetic results. DISCUSSION: Implant-borne rehabilitation is a reliable solution for prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with cleft lip and palate. This solution allows for avoiding removable prosthesis and dental mutilation.

Axial Implants in Immediate Function for Partial Rehabilitation in the Maxilla and Mandible: A Retrospective Clinical Study Evaluating the Long-Term Outcome (Up to 10 Years).

BACKGROUND: There is a need of long-term studies evaluating the outcome of fixed partial rehabilitations (FPR) supported by implants in an immediate function protocol. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the long-term outcome of FPR supported by implants placed in immediate function. METHODS: One hundred ninety-nine patients were consecutively included, between 1998 and 2010, with 481 implants supporting 213 FPR (maxilla: 87 and mandible: 126). Primary outcome measures were implant and FPR survival rates; secondary outcome measures were marginal bone levels at 5 and 10 years and incidence of mechanical and biological complications. RESULTS: The cumulative implant survival rate was 98.5% and 99.0% after 5 years and 92.7% and 96.7% after 10 years, using the patient and implant as unit of analysis, respectively. No prostheses were lost. Average (SD) marginal bone levels were 1.79 (0.93) and 1.89 mm (0.81 mm) at 5 and 10 years of follow-up. Mechanical complications occurred in 43 patients (21.6%), biological complications occurred in 12 patients (6%), and 16 implants (3.3%) up to the 10 years follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: FPR supported by immediate function implants in both jaws is a viable and safe treatment alternative.

[Immediate front implant placements 2. Objective and subjective aesthetic treatment results]. / Immediaat geplaatste fronttandimplantaten 2. Objectief en subjectief esthetisch behandelresultaat.

In this study, the aesthetic outcome of treatment was analysed after immediate implant placement in 16 patients. During implant installation the gap between the implant and the buccal plate was filled with a bone substitute. Only single tooth replacements were included; the final crowns were placed 3-6 months after implant installation, all with individual manufactured abutments with an emerging profile and platform switching. Postoperative aesthetics were analysed based on clinical photographs and satisfactionquestionnaires. The objectively attained White Esthetic Score and Pink Esthetic Score with an average value of 8.4 and 11.8 respectively, scored high, as was also observed for patient's satisfaction on both treatment and outcome (an average of 8.7). It may be concluded that flapless immediate implant placement together with the application of a bone substitute into the buccal gap in combination with a final crown with emerging profile results in objective and subjective good aesthetics and high patient satisfaction.

Reliability of four zygomatic implant-supported prostheses for the rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The reliability of oral rehabilitation by four zygomatic implants with no anterior support remains to be determined. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the predictability of this approach in regard to implant survival, technical and biologic complications, and quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic literature search was conducted from September 2000 to November 2013. Human clinical trials in which oral rehabilitation was achieved by the use of four zygomatic implants with no additional placement of standard implants were included. The primary outcome was the survival rate of the zygomatic implants. In addition, random effects meta-analyses of the selected studies were applied to avoid potential bias caused by methodologic differences among studies. RESULTS: Zygomatic implant survival rate weighted mean (WM) was 96.7% (range, 95.8% to 99.9%), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 92.5% to 98.5%. Only a limited number of surgical complications were reported, with orbital perforation the most significant. Similar results were obtained for prosthetic complications (few occurrences). Additionally, patient satisfaction levels were shown to be high, approaching that of the general population. CONCLUSION: Data from the present systematic review suggest that maxillary rehabilitation by four zygomatic implants with no anterior support is a reliable approach.