Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 554
Filter
1.
Niger J Clin Pract ; 27(4): 528-533, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38679777

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dermal fillers augment soft tissues by replacing lost volume in the skin or subcutaneous fat. Dentists and other professionals utilize or recommend facial fillers for cosmetic and therapeutic purposes. AIMS: This study aims to investigate public awareness regarding using nonsurgical facial dermal fillers in Saudi Arabia. METHODS AND MATERIAL: A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online self-administered questionnaire distributed to a total of 400 males and females through social media platforms. The participants reside in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. Descriptive statistics and the Chi-square test were employed for data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 256 participants completed the survey, including 204 females and 51 males, with a mean age of 33.86 (SD = 10.5) years. Among the participants, 88 (34.4%) reported using facial fillers. Among them, only 46 (18%) were frequent consumers. Knowledge regarding correctly using facial fillers was generally high, especially for the lips (240, 94%), chin augmentation (203, 79.3%), and face lifting (226, 88.3%). However, participants' knowledge needed improvement in other areas. Most participants were aware of the side effects, except for visual impairment (83, 32.4%) and blockage of the vessels (128, 50%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlighted a remarkable level of knowledge among participants regarding the uses of fillers. However, participants demonstrated low awareness of all possible side effects associated with the treatment. Participants had valid reasons for undergoing facial treatments. However, constraints preventing them from pursuing fillers included fear of unexpected results and financial limitations.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Saudi Arabia , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Adult , Cosmetic Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Face
2.
Open Vet J ; 14(3): 840-845, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38682143

ABSTRACT

Background: Dermal cosmetic fillers have been commonly used in camels in the last few years in Gulf countries. Aim: This study aimed to describe the radiographic as well as sonographic findings of injected cosmetic fillers in Arabian camel perinasal region in beauty shows. Methods: A total number of (n = 11,626) Arabian camels (Camelus dromedarius) were thoroughly investigated for injection of cosmetic fillers in the perinasal area. The age of the camels was 6 months to 10 years, and their weights were 400-650 kg. In parallel, a control group consisting of 30 age/weight-matched non-injected camels was used. Of the 11,626 examined camels, 25 animals (0.0.002%) were injected with cosmetic fillers in the perinasal region. Of the 25 camels, 19 (76%) were females and 6 (24%) were males. Radiographic examinations were carried out for the 25 injected camel perinasal regions. Results: Ultrasonographic examination of the injected perinasal regions revealed precise discrimination of the filler material, which appeared hypo-echogenic in 17 camels (68%) and with anechoic spots in the remaining 8 camels (32%). Variable degrees of swelling caused by the injection of moderate and large quantities of fillers were noted by radiographic assessment, the injected cosmetic filler was precisely diagnosed in the perinasal region as grey in color having soft tissue density in obtained radiographs. Conclusion: In conclusion, radiographic and ultrasonographic examinations are reliable, accurate, and non-invasive diagnostic imaging techniques that can precisely discriminate a filler agent in the soft tissues and determine the situ and size of cutaneous deposits in dromedary camels (C. dromedarius).


Subject(s)
Camelus , Ultrasonography , Animals , Female , Ultrasonography/veterinary , Male , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Radiography/veterinary , Cosmetics/administration & dosage
3.
Surg Radiol Anat ; 46(5): 615-624, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38480594

ABSTRACT

Hollow temples are not typically considered aesthetically pleasing, and hollowness worsens with the aging process. When filling this region with fillers, there are several anatomical considerations, with injection techniques varying depending on the layer targeted. Specifically, injections between the superficial temporal fascia and the superficial layer of the deep temporal fascia are performed using a cannula, while periosteal layer injections involve the use of a needle to reach the bone before inserting fillers. Detailed anatomical insights encompass the boundaries of the temporal fossa and cautionary notes regarding blood vessels, supported by specific studies on veins and arteries in the temporal region. Complications, including vessel injuries, are discussed alongside an exploration of various injection techniques. This review provides a comprehensive exploration of anatomical considerations and the specific methodologies employed in temple augmentation with fillers.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Humans , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Injections , Temporal Bone/anatomy & histology
4.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(6): 1992-2000, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38429946

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acne scar is an inflammatory condition, which commonly occurs in patients with acne vulgaris, especially in adults. Mesogels have been reported effective in improving atrophic acne scars. AIMS: We investigated the efficacy of adding Profhilo (a hyaluronic acid-based filler) to subcision as a new treatment method. METHODS: Twelve patients aged 18-45 years with atrophic acne scars on both sides of the face participated in this single-blinded, split-face, randomized controlled trial. Each side of the face was randomly assigned to one of the treatment methods, including subcision alone and subcision + Profhilo. Patients in the Profhilo arm received mesogel (1 cc) in addition to the subcision procedure. Both methods were carried out two times at 1-month intervals. Assessments were done based on the sonographic depth of scars, and two blinded observers examined photographs at baseline and 3 months after the final session and the results were reported based on an exclusively made formula as the total score. The Global Improvement Scale and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (for patient satisfaction) were also used. RESULTS: The VAS score of patient satisfaction was statistically significant in the Profhilo arm, with a mean improvement of 528.08 and 219.06 in the subcision arm (p = 0.02). No significant difference was seen in total acne scar reduction comparing the two methods (29.74 in the Profhilo arm and 22.27 in the subcision arm, p = 0.56). Sonographic depth reduction was also non-significant, with a mean of 29.21 in the Profhilo arm and 28.53 in the subcision arm (p = 0.4). The mean global improvement was reported as four in both arms, and no statistical significance was observed (p = 0.89). The best response to treatment belonged to the rolling subtype in both methods (p = 0.029 for the Profhilo arm and p = 0.001 for the subcision arm). CONCLUSION: Despite no significant difference between the methods, Profhilo is more effective due to a higher satisfaction rate and better physiologic effects.


Subject(s)
Acne Vulgaris , Cicatrix , Dermal Fillers , Hyaluronic Acid , Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Acne Vulgaris/complications , Single-Blind Method , Adult , Cicatrix/etiology , Cicatrix/therapy , Female , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Young Adult , Male , Treatment Outcome , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Adolescent , Middle Aged , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Face , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Cosmetic Techniques/instrumentation
5.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(6): 1969-1972, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38450900

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The intricate mechanisms of jowl formation, which ultimately lead to loss of lower jaw definition, skin laxity, and localized fat accumulation, involve interrelated factors such as skin aging, fat redistribution, muscle dynamics, and loss of support. AIMS: To propose a structured approach to the treatment of the jowl area that is comprehensive and tailored to the needs of each individual patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This integrative review combines a meticulous analysis of the literature with practical insights from real-world clinical settings. The authors draw on their extensive clinical experience to bridge research findings with practical clinical perspectives. RESULTS: This study presents a guideline for addressing jowl formation that starts with the major aging processes and, based on simple diagnostic questions, suggests minimally invasive interventions, including collagen stimulators, energy-based devices, lipolytic injectables, polydioxanone threads, and hyaluronic acid fillers. DISCUSSION: The guideline emphasizes the significance of personalized treatments while also acknowledging the need for comprehensive evaluation and recognizing the ever-evolving nature of aesthetic interventions in jowl management. CONCLUSION: This systematic approach can not only simplify diagnostic and treatment decisions for dermatologists but also enhance patient satisfaction by customizing treatment plans based on individual characteristics and expectations.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Rejuvenation , Skin Aging , Humans , Skin Aging/drug effects , Cosmetic Techniques/standards , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Patient Satisfaction
7.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(6): 1985-1991, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38487954

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid (HA) filler treatment is a minimally-invasive alternative to surgery to volumize the cheeks. HAVOL (Restylane® Volyme) is a flexible HA filler suited to contouring and volumizing the midface. METHODS: This randomized, evaluator-blinded, no-treatment controlled study evaluated effectiveness and safety of HAVOL for correction of midface volume deficit and midface contour deficiency in Chinese subjects. In total 111 subjects were randomized to HAVOL and 37 to no treatment (control). The primary endpoint was response, on the blinded evaluator-assessed Medicis Midface Volume Scale (MMVS), at 6 months after last injection for the treatment group and 6 months after randomization for controls, where response was defined as ≥1-point improvement from baseline on both sides of the face. RESULTS: HAVOL was superior to no treatment at 6 months, meeting the primary objective: 76% versus 8% MMVS responders, a difference of 68% (CI: 55.7%-79.4%, p < 0.0001). These effects were sustained in 51% at 12 months after last injection. A majority (≥96%) had improved aesthetic appearance of midface fullness at Month 1 (using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale [GAIS]), effects which remained in ≥80% up to 12 months. Volume change captured by 3D photography increased after 1 month to 3.6 mL (close to the total injected volume of 3.4 mL), and remained stable through 12 months. Over 97% reported satisfaction with results after treatment with HAVOL. Additionally, HAVOL was well tolerated, with no unanticipated related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that HAVOL is effective and well tolerated for midface treatment in a Chinese population.


Subject(s)
Asian People , Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Face , Hyaluronic Acid , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Hyaluronic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Female , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Adult , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Male , Treatment Outcome , Esthetics , Patient Satisfaction , Single-Blind Method , China
9.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 48(7): 1417-1425, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38305924

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers injection is a common procedure in patients with cosmetic needs. Concomitant pain is a major complaint among patients undergoing HA filler injections. Relevant research is limited and there is no consensus on pain management of dermal filler injection. OBJECTIVES: To assist physicians in determining a more appropriate treatment approach, and to better provide treatment suggestions. METHODS: A nationwide (China) cross-sectional survey was conducted using questionnaires designed for physicians and patients, respectively. A total of 62 semi-structured questionnaires were administered to aesthetic physicians via face-to-face interview, whereas 123 online-based questionnaires were collected from patients who have ever undergone HA treatment. The collected questionnaire information was analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. RESULTS: 42 (67.74%) physicians observed that over 50% of their patients were concerned about pain during injection. 101 (82.11%) of patients were concerned about impending pain ≥5 points (a total score is 10) before injection. For preferred pain relief modalities, 48 (77.42%) physicians would choose a hyaluronic acid dermal filler with lidocaine, and 82 (66.67%) patients would choose anesthetic-containing products. 59 (95.16%) physicians who injected lidocaine-containing hyaluronic acid found patients had a comfortable treatment experience. CONCLUSIONS: Pain management during hyaluronic acid dermal fillers injection is important from both perspectives of physicians and patients. This survey showed that compared with other analgesic methods, lidocaine-containing hyaluronic acid has offered a more satisfying experience. It also provides insights to physicians and patients in pain management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Hyaluronic Acid , Pain Management , Humans , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Male , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Pain Management/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , China , Pain Measurement , Pain, Procedural/etiology , Pain, Procedural/diagnosis , Injections, Subcutaneous , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data
10.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(5): 1604-1612, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38318685

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Restylane portfolio of soft tissue fillers spans a wide range of indications, due in part to their complementary manufacturing technologies [non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid (NASHA) and Optimal Balance Technology (OBT/XpresHAn)]. Using an array of products, injectors can achieve a holistic, natural looking effect for their patients. However, with a wide range of products it may be difficult to choose an optimal combination. AIM: Simplify and align global use recommendations for NASHA versus OBT products. METHODS: Two pre-meeting surveys were completed by 11 key opinion leaders with international representation, with the goal of collecting information regarding their current injection practices for various anatomical regions of the face (i.e., temporal region, forehead, tear trough, lateral zygoma, anteromedial cheek, nose, pyriform aperture, nasolabial fold, perioral area, lips, labiomental crease, marionette lines, chin, and jawline). The data collected from these surveys was subsequently discussed in a consensus group meeting involving 11 voting members and 3 nonvoting members. RESULTS: Top product recommendations were identified for each anatomical area, along with secondary and tertiary recommendations that can also be used under defined circumstances. Recommendations were provided based on a consideration of elements such as patient features (e.g., skin thickness, bone structure), the desired aesthetic outcome, experience of the injector, and the preferred injection technique. CONCLUSION: A majority consensus regarding the top NASHA versus OBT product choice for each anatomical region of the face was reached. These recommendations represent international agreement regarding the use of Restylane products.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Face , Hyaluronic Acid , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Humans , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Cosmetic Techniques/instrumentation , Cosmetic Techniques/standards , Skin Aging/drug effects , Gels , Practice Guidelines as Topic
11.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(6): NP402-NP410, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38366708

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The ability to degrade hyaluronic acid (HA)-based fillers with hyaluronidase allows for better management of adverse effects and reversal of suboptimal treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the enzymatic degradation kinetics of 16 commercially available HA-based fillers, representing 6 manufacturing technologies. METHODS: In this nonclinical study, a recently developed in vitro multidose hyaluronidase administration protocol was used to induce degradation of HA-based fillers, enabling real-time evaluation of viscoelastic properties under near-static conditions. Each filler was exposed to repeated doses of hyaluronidase at intervals of 5 minutes to reach the degradation threshold of G' ≤ 30 Pa. RESULTS: Noticeable differences in degradation characteristics were observed based on the design and technology of different filler classes. Vycross fillers were the most difficult to degrade and the Cohesive Polydensified Matrix filler was the least difficult to degrade. Preserved Network Technology products demonstrated proportional increases in gel degradation time and enzyme volume required for degradation across the individual resilient hyaluronic acid (RHA) products and indication categories. No obvious relationship was observed between gel degradation characteristics and the individual parameters of HA concentration, HA chain length, or the degree of modification of each filler when analyzed separately; however, a general correlation was identified with certain physicochemical properties. CONCLUSIONS: Manufacturing technology was the most important factor influencing the reversibility of an HA product. An understanding of the differential degradation profiles of commercially available fillers will allow clinicians to select products that offer a higher margin of safety due to their preferential reversibility.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Hyaluronic Acid , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/metabolism , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/chemistry , Hyaluronic Acid/chemistry , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/metabolism , Dermal Fillers/chemistry , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Kinetics , Humans , Materials Testing , Viscosity , Elasticity
12.
Dermatol Surg ; 50(5): 453-458, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38386847

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, hyaluronidase (HYAL) is used after hyaluronic acid (HA) injection to dissolve the undesired migration of product. OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel lip augmentation technique that uses HA and HYAL simultaneously in patients who previously had HA migration. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine hundred twenty female patients were included. In the first group ( n = 793), HA injections were performed in subcutaneous plane of the lips. In the second group who had previous product migration ( n = 127), 7.5 units of HYAL is injected in 4 points in ergotrid area before proceeding with HA injection. RESULTS: The medicis lip fullness scale scores after 2 weeks improved in all patients, while 92% of patients perceived the results as "very much improved" with Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale ( p ˂ .001). There was no difference between 2 groups regarding the patient satisfaction rates ( p ˃.05), while filler migration was seen in 0.2% ( n : 15) of patients in the first group during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The new vertical injection approach provided an increased vertical height, optimal eversion, and an incisor display on the lips. The simultaneous use of HYAL before HA injection seems to be a safe and effective practice in 1-stage treatment of the previously injected lips with filler migration into ergotrid area.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Hyaluronic Acid , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase , Lip , Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Female , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Adult , Middle Aged , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/administration & dosage , Aged , Injections, Subcutaneous , Esthetics , Treatment Outcome , Foreign-Body Migration/etiology
13.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(5): 1613-1619, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38299745

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tear trough filling is a popular facial rejuvenation procedure, and hyaluronic acid is typically used as the filler of choice. However, Tyndall's phenomenon, a common complication following hyaluronic acid injection, can occur, leading to skin discoloration of the lower eyelid. AIMS: This single-center, prospective, comparative clinical study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of collagen and hyaluronic acid injections in treating tear trough deformity. METHODS: Sixty patients were enrolled between June 2022 and January 2023. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups: Group A received hyaluronic acid, Group B received hyaluronic acid combined with collagen, and Group C received collagen alone. Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, and tear trough deformity grade were considered before therapy. Changes in tear trough deformity scores, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scores, and the presence of the Tyndall effect were analyzed at 1 and 3 months postinjection to determine differences among the three groups. RESULTS: Baseline profiles of the three groups were similar. In the first month postinjection, there was no difference in the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scores and tear trough deformity between the three groups. However, in the third-month postinjection, there was a significant difference in scores between patients in Group C and those in Groups A or B. The Tyndall effect manifested in three patients in Group A, which was significantly different from that in Groups B and C. CONCLUSION: The combined use of hyaluronic acid with collagen in injectable fillers corrected tear trough deformities and reduced the occurrence of the Tyndall phenomenon, which can be problematic with hyaluronic acid alone. Additionally, this combination may help overcome the disadvantage of a shorter retention period when using collagen alone.


Subject(s)
Collagen , Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Hyaluronic Acid , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Female , Collagen/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Adult , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Male , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Rejuvenation , Eyelids/drug effects , Esthetics , Skin Aging/drug effects
15.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(6): 1973-1984, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38357772

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Calcium hydroxylapatite-carboxymethylcellulose (CaHA-CMC) injectables have emerged as dual-purpose fillers with bioregenerative and direct filling capabilities. AIMS: This study investigates the rheological properties of CaHA-CMC and its CMC carrier gel at various dilutions. METHODS: The storage modulus (G'), loss modulus (G″), complex viscosity (η*), loss factor (tan δ), cohesivity, and extrusion force were evaluated for a range of CaHA-CMC aqueous dilutions with an oscillatory rheometer, drop weight testing, and force analysis, respectively. RESULTS: Results revealed a significant decrease in G', η*, and increase in tan(δ) with increasing dilution, indicating a decline in the product's direct filling capabilities. Cohesivity decreased dramatically with dilution, potentially enhancing tissue biointegration and the product's biostimulatory effects. The CMC gel carrier displayed inelastic and non-resilient properties, with rheological changes differing from CaHA-CMC. Dilutional rheology was also correlated with previously published dilution-dependent biostimulatory data where hyperdiluted CaHA-CMC (>1:2) demonstrated a regenerative profile and diluted or hypodiluted mixtures retained meaningful filling properties and increased regeneration. CONCLUSIONS: These findings offer a continuum for tailoring the product's rheological profile to match specific tissue requirements. Customizable rheology allows CaHA-CMC to be tuned for either filling and contouring or optimal regenerative effects. Importantly, safety implications related to vascular occlusion suggest that dilutional rheomodulation decreases the risk of vascular events. In conclusion, this study highlights the significant impact of aqueous dilution on the rheological properties of CaHA-CMC and its carrier gel. The findings support the clinical application of tailored dilutions to achieve desired outcomes, providing versatility and safety for aesthetic applications.


Subject(s)
Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium , Dermal Fillers , Durapatite , Rheology , Humans , Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium/chemistry , Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium/administration & dosage , Viscosity , Durapatite/chemistry , Durapatite/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/chemistry , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Cosmetic Techniques/instrumentation , Regeneration/drug effects , Gels/chemistry , Materials Testing , Biocompatible Materials/chemistry , Biocompatible Materials/administration & dosage
16.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(6): 1964-1968, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38369859

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Facial fillers and injectables have transformed the landscape of cosmetic procedures, offering rejuvenation possibilities. However, the emergence of "Facial Overfilled Syndrome (FOS)" presents a concerning trend attributed to excessive filler use and suboptimal injection techniques. Understanding the interplay between facial aging and augmentation techniques is crucial in addressing and preventing FOS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Facial overfilled syndrome is characterized by the excessive use of fillers, resulting in a distorted and heavy appearance. It manifests in various forms, including 'flowerhorn' foreheads, 'sunset' eyes, 'chipmunk' cheeks, 'witch' chins, and 'pillow' faces. The syndrome arises from attempts to combat anatomical aging with dramatic filler treatments, causing rapid volume changes and skin tightening. Skeletal structures and soft tissue distribution across different ethnicities play a significant role in FOS development. RESULTS: Understanding the aging process across facial tissues is essential, as fillers cannot entirely reverse aging manifestations. Tailored assessment and treatment plans should precede filler injections, involving muscle assessment, observation of facial movements during injection, and ultrasound imaging of fat layers. Attention should be given to filler pressure and migration risks, particularly in areas with elevated pressure. Additionally, alternative approaches like energy-based devices and polymer reinforcement of facial ligaments should be considered to minimize filler use. Ethnic variations in facial anatomy require careful consideration to avoid overcorrection. CONCLUSION: FOS predominantly affects individuals of East Asian descent due to specific facial characteristics. Prevention strategies involve minimizing filler use, addressing underlying bone changes, and considering ethnic and gender differences in facial anatomy. Recent MRI and ultrasound studies challenge the notion of filler breakdown, emphasizing the importance of filler selection and injection techniques. Education, individualized treatments, and a holistic understanding of facial anatomy are key to preventing and managing FOS and ensuring natural and harmonious facial aesthetics.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Face , Skin Aging , Humans , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Rejuvenation
17.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(5): 1579-1582, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38174823

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is an autoimmune disease with multifactor etiology which develops in genetically susceptible patients. Rarely, DLE lesions can mimic other connective tissue disorders such as morphea. The growing application of soft tissue fillers is associated with increasing complications. Some substances used for soft tissue augmentation such as silicon implants may trigger lupus erythematosus diseases. CASE REPORT: Here we report a case of morphea-like discoid lupus erythematosus developed several years after polyacrylamide dermal filler (PAAG) injection for facial rejuvenation. CONCLUSION: As noninvasive procedures like dermal filler injections are increasing worldwide, physicians may consider the long-term probable side effects of these compounds.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins , Dermal Fillers , Lupus Erythematosus, Discoid , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Discoid/diagnosis , Lupus Erythematosus, Discoid/chemically induced , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Female , Acrylic Resins/adverse effects , Acrylic Resins/administration & dosage , Scleroderma, Localized/chemically induced , Scleroderma, Localized/diagnosis , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Middle Aged
18.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(6): 647-657, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38262634

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acids (HAs) continue to be the fillers of choice worldwide and their popularity is growing. Adverse events (AEs) are able to be resolved through the use of hyaluronidase (HYAL). However, routine HYAL use has been at issue due to perceived safety issues. OBJECTIVES: There are currently no guidelines on the use of HYAL in aesthetic practice, leading to variability in storage, preparation, skin testing, and beliefs concerning AEs. This manuscript interrogated the use of this agent in daily practice. METHODS: A 39-question survey concerning HYAL practice was completed by 264 healthcare practitioners: 244 from interrogated databases and 20 from the consensus panel. Answers from those in the database were compared to those of the consensus panel. RESULTS: Compared to the database group, the consensus group was more confident in the preparation of HYAL, kept reconstituted HYAL for longer, and was less likely to skin test for HYAL sensitivity and more likely to treat with HYAL in an emergency, even in those with a wasp or bee sting anaphylactic history. Ninety-two percent of all respondents had never observed an acute reaction to HYAL. Just over 1% of respondents had ever observed anaphylaxis. Five percent of practitioners reported longer-term adverse effects, including 3 respondents who reported loss of deep tissues. Consent before injecting HA for the possible requirement of HYAL was always obtained by 74% of practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: Hyaluronidase would appear to be an essential agent for anyone injecting hyaluronic acid filler. However, there is an absence of evidence-based recommendations with respect to the concentration, dosing, and treatment intervals of HYAL, and these should ideally be available.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Hyaluronic Acid , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/administration & dosage , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Anaphylaxis/chemically induced
20.
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd ; 130(12): 520-524, 2023 Dec.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38051086

ABSTRACT

The use of dermal fillers for cosmetic procedures has increased rapidly both worldwide and in the Netherlands in recent years, which has led to an absolute increase in reported side effects and complications. Although most of these complications are mild, serious complications such as vascular occlusion can also occur. In this article, we describe a case of a 35-year-old woman who showed signs of reduced tissue perfusion and the early stage of skin necrosis following injection of hyaluronic acid fillers in the chin. This complication was successfully treated by ultrasound-guided injection of hyaluronidase, resulting in a full recovery without residual symptoms. To minimize the risk of serious complications treatment with hyaluronic acid fillers should be carried out by an experienced practitioner.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Hyaluronic Acid , Peripheral Vascular Diseases , Adult , Female , Humans , Chin/blood supply , Chin/pathology , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Injections, Subcutaneous , Skin/blood supply , Skin/pathology , Necrosis/drug therapy , Necrosis/etiology , Necrosis/prevention & control , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/administration & dosage , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/therapeutic use , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/drug therapy , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...