Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Dermatol Sci ; 93(2): 116-122, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30709685

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ultraviolet B (UVB) is commonly used for treating dermatologic conditions. Recently, high irradiance UVB (HIUVB) has been suggested to be more effective for treating skin conditions as compared to its low irradiance (LI) counterpart. The biological impact of UVB radiation emitted at different irradiance on cutaneous immunity remains obscure. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the impacts of UVB radiation administered at equivalent fluence (mJ/cm2) but different irradiance (mW/cm2) on cutaneous immune response. METHODS: Cultured bone marrow derived dendritic cell (BMDC) were treated with equivalent fluence of UVB radiation with HIUVB or LIUVB. The phenotypic and functional alterations of BMDCs were documented. Animal models were used to validate the in vitro results in vivo and explore the mechanisms involved. RESULTS: After equivalent fluence of UVB radiation, the HIUVB treated BMDC showed significantly lower MHCII and CD86 expressions, reduced capacity to stimulate T cell proliferation, and enhanced activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR)-activated genes as compared to control while their LIUVB treated counterpart showed no significant change. Using animal model, the HIUVB induced significantly higher immune suppressive effect in mice as compared to their LIUVB counterpart after equivalent fluence of UVB treatment. The superior immune suppressive effect of HIUVB over LIUVB radiation was not observed when similar experiments were performed using AhR-deficient mice. CONCLUSION: We propose irradiance played an important role modulating UVB-induced cutaneous immune suppression. Future works on UVB phototherapy, both clinical and research, should incorporate this important parameter into consideration.


Subject(s)
Dendritic Cells/radiation effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/radiotherapy , Immune Tolerance/radiation effects , Ultraviolet Therapy/methods , Animals , Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors/genetics , Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors/metabolism , Cell Proliferation/radiation effects , Cells, Cultured , Dendritic Cells/immunology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Mice, Transgenic , Primary Cell Culture , Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon/genetics , Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon/metabolism , Signal Transduction/radiation effects , Skin/cytology , Skin/immunology , Skin/radiation effects , Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/radiation effects , Treatment Outcome
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 78(2): 117-130, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29205369

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ultraviolet (UV) B irradiation is known to suppress contact hypersensitivity (CHS) responses in mouse models by suppressing immune responses. However, the cellular mechanisms responsible for UVB-induced systemic suppression remain unclear. Regulatory B cells have been reported to play an inhibitory role during CHS. It is presently unknown whether regulatory B cells contribute to the effect of UVB phototherapy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the inductive effect of UVB on regulatory B cells and the underlying mechanisms by using a CHS mouse model. METHODS: CHS was induced with oxazolone, and evaluated by histopathology, flow cytometry, and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULT: We found that UVB irradiation induced regulatory B cell expansion and ameliorated CHS. UVB-induced regulatory B cells contribute to systemic immunosuppression by inhibiting the proliferation of T cells. Moreover, we determined that toll-like receptor (TLR) 4, the expression of which was upregulated in B cells after UVB exposure, played an essential role in the induction of regulatory B cells. CONCLUSION: Our data identified regulatory B cells as regulators of UVB-induced immunosuppression in CHS, and suggest the importance of the UVB-TLR4 axis in the generation of regulatory B cells.


Subject(s)
B-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/radiation effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/radiotherapy , Toll-Like Receptor 4/metabolism , Ultraviolet Therapy , Animals , B-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , Biomarkers/metabolism , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/immunology , Flow Cytometry , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Ultraviolet Rays , Up-Regulation
3.
J Dermatol Sci ; 59(3): 192-7, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20691571

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ultraviolet (UV) A radiation, which has both mutagenic and immune suppressive effects on the skin, is increasingly recognised as a key contributor to cutaneous carcinogenesis. Whilst short wavelength UVB (290-320 nm) is well-recognised as an environmental health hazard, the dangers of UVA (320-400 nm) are relatively unexplored. OBJECTIVE: Using the nickel model of recall immunity in healthy human volunteers, we determined the wavelength dependency for UV-induced immunosuppression across the UVA spectrum. METHODS: Dose-response curves were established for local suppression of contact hypersensitivity responses to nickel at 7 wavelengths between 331 and 392 nm. RESULTS: We found a broad peak of UVA immune suppressive effectiveness at 364-385 nm. Whilst we had previously found linear dose-responses for UVB-induced immunosuppression in this model, long wavelength UVA caused bell-shaped, Gaussian dose-responses, suggesting different chromophores and mechanisms of immunosuppression for UVB and UVA. CONCLUSION: The immunosuppressive peak induced by longwave UVA has not been described previously for any species and being close to the border with visible light indicates an unexpected role for these long wavebands in human health and disease.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/radiotherapy , Immune Tolerance/radiation effects , Immunosuppression Therapy , Nickel/toxicity , Skin/radiation effects , Ultraviolet Rays , Adult , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/immunology , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Skin/drug effects , Skin/immunology
4.
Dermatitis ; 19(2): 90-4, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18413110

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Grenz ray therapy (GRT) has been used to treat dermatoses refractory to other therapy. Patient's assessments to GRT alone have not been previously reported. OBJECTIVE: (1) To report the patterns of use of GRT at our center over a 10-year period and evaluate the efficacy of GRT in treating recalcitrant skin conditions, (2) to evaluate patient perceptions about GRT, and (3) to evaluate whether patients felt this form of treatment was worthwhile. METHOD: Cross-sectional survey by mailed questionnaire to patients treated with GRT from 1990 to 2001. RESULTS: Of 351 patients treated with GRT from 1990 to 2001, 98 (28%) returned the questionnaire; 64% reported decreased severity or clearing of disease (p = .003), and 63% reported decreased or no discomfort (p = .006) 3 months following treatment. Overall, 54% said GRT was worthwhile, and 53% would choose it again; 40% reported mild side effects. Number of treatments (p = .2) or total dose (p = .25) were not significantly different among responders to GRT and nonresponders to GRT. In a subgroup of treated patients with a diagnosis of contact dermatitis (94% with hand dermatitis), 64% felt GRT was worthwhile and 77% indicated that they would choose this therapy again if needed. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients treated with GRT for recalcitrant dermatitis reported that this treatment was an effective therapy in decreasing the discomfort and severity of their skin condition. Overall, just more than half of treated patients believed GRT was a worthwhile therapy that they would use again.


Subject(s)
Patient Satisfaction , Skin Diseases/radiotherapy , X-Ray Therapy/methods , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/radiotherapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/radiotherapy , Female , Hand Dermatoses/radiotherapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psoriasis/radiotherapy , Radiation Dosage , Skin Diseases/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , X-Ray Therapy/adverse effects , X-Ray Therapy/psychology
6.
Contact Dermatitis ; 53(2): 114, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16033406

ABSTRACT

Acrylates are a well-known cause of occupational contact dermatitis due to its widespread use in several settings such as dentistry, orthopaedic surgery, graphic industry and cosmetics. We describe the case of a manicurist who developed occupational rhinitis and allergic contact dermatitis induced by the application of acrylic-sculptured nails.


Subject(s)
Acrylates/toxicity , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/radiotherapy , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Rhinitis/etiology , Adult , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Patch Tests , Rhinitis/diagnosis
8.
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed ; 19(4): 203-12, 2003 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12925192

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Contact hypersensitivity (CHS) reaction is a useful model for studying the skin immune system and inflammatory reactions in the skin. In this study, an experimental model of CHS reaction was employed to assess immunomodulatory effects of near-infrared (near-IR) low-intensity laser (LIL) irradiation, which is used as adjuvant therapy in dermatology, physical medicine, rheumatology, etc., because of its declared anti-inflammatory, biostimulative and analgesic effects. METHODS: The effects of near-IR LIL irradiation (lambda=904 nm, irradiance 60 mW/cm2, fluence 3.6 J/cm2) on CHS reaction to 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) in Albino Oxford rats were examined by irradiating experimental groups of animals before the induction phase of CHS reaction, while nonirradiated animals and animals that received vehicle instead of hapten served as controls. Ear-swelling assay, histopathological examination of H&E preparations of ear skin, computer-assisted image analysis of dermal infiltrate, ear skin organ culture with the determination of cutaneous production of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (by ELISA assay) and nitric oxide (by Griess' assay) were used for measuring the effects of LIL in the elicitation phase of CHS reaction. Cellularity, dendritic cell content, flow cytometry and proliferation assays (spontaneous and in the presence of IL-2 and concanavalin A) of the draining lymph node cells (DLNC) were performed for the assessment of LIL irradiation effects in the induction phase. RESULTS: In the irradiated group of animals, ear swelling was significantly diminished compared to control animals (101+/-11.5% vs. 58+/-11.6%, P<0.01). This was accompanied by a highly significant decrease in the density of dermal infiltrate (22+/-0.81 vs. 14.2+/-1.75 cells per unit area, P<0.01) and a significant decrease in nitrite levels in the medium conditioned by organ-cultured ear skin (17.63+/-1.91 vs. 3.16+/-1.69 microM NaNO2; P<0.01), while TNF-alpha concentration was not changed. Cellularity and dendritic cell content in DLNC population, as well as the expression of TCR-alpha, CD4, CD8 and CD25, were not changed between irradiated and nonirradiated animals. Proliferation rates of DLNC cultured for 72 h were significantly lower in irradiated animals (17.3+/-4.1 vs. 13.9+/-0.9 x 103 c.p.m.; P<0.01). In cultures of DLNC with added rIL-2 or 0.5 microg/ml of concanavalin A, proliferation rates were also significantly decreased in irradiated animals (34.7+/-3.5 vs. 31.2+/-2. c.p.m. in IL-2-supplemented culture, P<0.01; 70.9+/-6.4 vs. 58.3+/-9.1 x 103 c.p.m. in concanavalin A-supplemented culture, P<0.01). However, this effect was overcome in the presence of the higher concentration of concanavalin A (2.5 microg/ml) (nonirradiated 38.7+/-3.1, irradiated 123.1+/-7.3 x 103 c.p.m., P<0.01). CONCLUSION: LIL irradiation showed a systemic immunomodulatory effect on CHS reaction to DNCB in rats. Decreased ear swelling observed in the elicitation phase was associated with diminished proliferative responses of the DLNC in the induction phase of CHS reaction. Further experimental work is needed to examine the possible mechanisms of these effects.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/radiotherapy , Infrared Rays , Phototherapy/methods , Animals , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/immunology , Dinitrochlorobenzene , Ear, External , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Flow Cytometry , Lymph Nodes/cytology , Male , Rats , Rats, Inbred Strains , Statistics, Nonparametric
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...