Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Food Chem Toxicol ; 122: 206-214, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30300728

ABSTRACT

Recent European regulations have indicated the need for new bioanalytical screening methods capable of monitoring dioxin and dioxin-like compounds in foodstuffs and environmental samples, cost-effectively and with a quicker turnaround. Cryo-cells of the hepatic H4IIE line preserved in 96-well plates were exposed to sample extracts prepared from various foodstuffs and analysed for their content of dioxins and dioxin-like compounds by means of the 7-Ethoxyresorufin-O-Deethylase (EROD)-assay in two laboratories. Assay data were compared between both laboratories and results from instrumental analysis used as a confirmatory method. Additionally, cut-off values for the different studied matrices were derived. The current European regulation regarding methods of analysis for the control of foodstuffs was applied with the aim of determining the feasibility of the cryo-methodology. Results obtained in both laboratories were in congruence with the required validation parameters of the Commission Regulation (EU) No 2017/644. Cut-off values should be established matrix-dependent to reduce the rate of false compliant results and to keep the rate of false non-compliant results under control. In summary, the ready-to-use cryo-assay method for the bioanalytical screening of foodstuffs in control laboratories without cell-culture facilities has successfully proven to be accurate, far quicker and more cost effective than current methods.


Subject(s)
Chemistry Techniques, Analytical/methods , Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A1/metabolism , Dioxins/analysis , Food Contamination/analysis , Freezing , Animals , Cell Line , Cell Line, Tumor , Dioxins/standards , Europe , Guideline Adherence , Limit of Detection , Rats
3.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 20(12): 8590-9, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23690076

ABSTRACT

While the World Health Organization 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) equivalency factors are useful estimates of relative potencies of mixtures when conducting risk assessments, they are not useful when comparing the results of bioassays such as the H4IIE-luc to concentrations of TCDD equivalents calculated from instrumental analyses. Since there are thousands of dioxin-like compounds (DLCs), one use of screening assays is to determine if all of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) active DLCs in a mixture have been accounted for in instrumental analyses. For this purpose, bioassay-specific relative potency (ReP) values are needed. RePs of 21 polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans, and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls that exhibit effects mediated through the AhR were determined by use of the H4IIE-luc assay. Different values of RePs are derived, depending on the statistical, curve-fitting methods used to derive them from the dose-response relationships. Here, we discuss the various methods for deriving RePs from in vitro data and their assumptions and effects on values of RePs. Full dose-response curves of 2,3,7,8-TCDD and other representative DLCs were used to estimate effective concentrations at multiple points (e.g., EC20-50-80), which were then used to estimate ReP of each DLC to 2,3,7,8-TCDD.


Subject(s)
Benzofurans/toxicity , Biological Assay/standards , Polychlorinated Biphenyls/toxicity , Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins/analogs & derivatives , Animals , Benzofurans/standards , Biological Assay/methods , Dibenzofurans, Polychlorinated , Dioxins/standards , Dioxins/toxicity , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Polychlorinated Biphenyls/standards , Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins/standards , Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins/toxicity , Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon
5.
Anal Chim Acta ; 672(1-2): 50-4, 2010 Jul 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20579489

ABSTRACT

Dioxins (PCDD/Fs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are ubiquitous environmental contaminants. The contamination of food products with dioxins and PCBs is a well studied issue, because food is generally considered the major source of dioxin intake for humans. In Italy, the Regional Monitoring Plan (part of the national residue monitoring plan) used in the field for 2009 has also included the control of environmental pollutants in small egg producers. Following an irregular result, 12 laying hens were transferred into a laboratory controlled environment. Eggs were collected for 60 days and they were weekly analysed for the evaluation of dioxins, dioxin-like PCBs (DL-PCBs), and non-dioxin-like PCBs (NDL-PCBs, six congeners) levels. The dioxins and PCBs contents were determined, according to EPA methods, by gas chromatography ic determination coupled with high resolution mass spectrometry (HRGC-HRMS). The content of PCDD/Fs, DL-PCBs and NDL-PCBs was evaluated weekly by mean from week to week. The concentration of dioxins was lower than DL-PCBs (2.5 pg TEQ g(-1) of fat against 4.5 pg TEQ g(-1) of fat), but we observed the same depletion trend for both pollutants. On the opposite, NDL-PCBs had a different course: we noted there was an increase between weeks 6 and 7, but the mean levels remained very low (about 20 ng g(-1) of fat). The dioxins, and sum of dioxin and DL-PCBs concentration were below the fixed European limits (i.e. 3 pg TEQ g(-1) of fat for dioxins and 6 pg TEQ g(-1) of fat for sum of dioxins and DL-PCBs), beginning from the 3rd week of trial.


Subject(s)
Dioxins/analysis , Eggs/standards , Environmental Pollutants/standards , Food Contamination/analysis , Polychlorinated Biphenyls/standards , Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins/analogs & derivatives , Chromatography, Gas/methods , Dioxins/standards , Eggs/analysis , Environmental Pollutants/analysis , Italy , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Polychlorinated Biphenyls/analysis , Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins/analysis , Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins/standards
6.
Chemosphere ; 64(2): 234-44, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16458345

ABSTRACT

An intercalibration study on organobromine compounds has been conducted to evaluate the accuracy and reliability in the analysis of brominated flame retardants (BFRs) such as polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and their related compounds like polybrominated and monobromo-polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and -furans (PBDDs/DFs, MoBPCDDs/DFs). This paper reports the results for these compounds in 'Mixed Standard Solutions' and 'Air-Dried Sediment'. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) for PBDEs, PBDDs/DFs and MoBPCDDs/DFs in mixed standard solutions ranged from 9% to 24%, 4% to 20% and 8% to 27%, respectively. The results of this study are better than those reported in earlier international interlaboratory studies due to general improvement in analytical methods and an increasing number of available authentic standards, particularly for PBDEs. In the analysis for higher brominated compounds such as octabromodibenzodioxin, the participants were advised to optimize the calibration curves befitting the range of concentrations found in samples because variation of relative response factors was noted. The results for 'Air-Dried Sediment' were also reasonable with RSDs from 10% to 38% for PBDEs, 8% to 38% for PBDDs/DFs and 17% to 36% for MoBPCDDs/DFs. In the sediment sample, possible errors in the sample pretreatment and/or interference by other compounds/impurities were indicated. The concentrations of pentabromodiphenylether, BDE100, varied more than the other PBDE isomers due to its poor separation in some chromatographic conditions. In addition, interference by PBDEs was observed in the analysis for PBDFs. Potential degradation/secondary formulation of PBDEs and PBDFs during the Soxhlet extraction were suggested when copper powder was added into the sediment samples. Inspite of these observations, the results in this study are better than those reported in other interlaboratory studies due to the advice given to participants for improving the results. Compared with the results for PCDDs/DFs (5-23% RSDs) and Co-PCBs (6-24% RSDs), the RSDs for most of the organobromine compounds were high, indicating an immature QA/QC approach for the analysis of PBDEs and related compounds in comparison to common chlorinated dioxins.


Subject(s)
Dioxins/analysis , Environmental Pollutants/analysis , Flame Retardants/analysis , Polybrominated Biphenyls/analysis , Calibration , Dioxins/standards , Environmental Pollutants/standards , Flame Retardants/standards , Phenyl Ethers/analysis , Phenyl Ethers/standards , Polybrominated Biphenyls/standards , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results
9.
Ann N Y Acad Sci ; 895: 348-64, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10676427

ABSTRACT

We were requested by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to clarify the relationships among the minimal risk level (MRL), action level, and environmental media evaluation guide (EMEG) for dioxin established by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). In response we developed a document entitled "Dioxin and Dioxin-Like Compounds in Soil, Part I: ATSDR Interim Policy Guideline"; and a supporting document entitled "Dioxin and Dioxin-Like Compounds in Soil, Part II: Technical Support Document". In these documents, we evaluated the key assumptions underlying the development and use of the ATSDR action level, MRL, and EMEG for dioxin. We described the chronology of events outlining these different health guidance values for dioxin and identified the areas of uncertainty surrounding these values. Four scientific assumptions were found to have had a great impact on this process; these were: (1) the specific uncertainty factors used, (2) the toxicity equivalent (TEQ) approach, (3) the fractional exposure from different pathways, and (4) the use of body burdens in the absence of exposure data. This information was subsequently used to develop a framework for reducing the uncertainties in public health risk assessment associated with exposure to other chemical contaminants in the environment. Within this framework are a number of future directions for reducing uncertainty, including physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling (PBPK), benchmark dose modeling (BMD), functional toxicology, and the assessment of chemical mixture interactions.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking , Dioxins/adverse effects , Environmental Pollutants/adverse effects , Policy Making , Public Health , Dioxins/standards , Environmental Health , Environmental Pollutants/standards , Humans , Pharmacokinetics , Public Policy , Reference Values , Risk Assessment , Toxicity Tests , United States
11.
Sci Total Environ ; 104(1-2): 1-7, 1991 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1871585

ABSTRACT

The National Institute of Standards and Technology issues approximately 1100 Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) certified for chemical composition or physical properties. A number of these SRMs has been developed to assist chemists in analyzing environmental samples more reliably for chlorinated dioxins and other organic pollutants. Certification of the pollutant concentration in a natural matrix SRM is based on concordant analyses by the NIST Organic Analytical Research Division using at least two independent methods. For a calibration solution, such as SRM 1614, Dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) in Isooctane, certification is based on agreement of the calculated concentration based on the gravimetric preparation and the concentration as determined experimentally. SRM 1614 also includes a 13C-labeled 2,3,7,8-TCDD for use as an internal standard in methods based on gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The certified concentrations (ng g-1) are 98.3 +/- 3.3 for the unlabeled dioxin and 95.6 +/- 1.5 for the labeled dioxin. The certificates for SRM 1588, Organics in Cod Liver Oil, and SRM 1589, Polychlorinated Biphenyls (as Aroclor 1260) in Human Serum, provide noncertified concentrations of dioxins. Concentrations of chlorinated dioxins in two urban particulate SRMs have been reported in the literature.


Subject(s)
Dioxins/standards , Environmental Pollutants/analysis , Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins/standards , Dioxins/analysis , Government Agencies , Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins/analysis , Reference Standards , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...