Effects of major analgesics on male fertility: A systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVE: To verify, based on a systematic literature review, the effects of the main analgesics on male fertility. DATA SOURCES: The studies were analyzed from the PubMed, SciELO and LILACS databases. STUDY SELECTION: The articles selected for the present review included: cohort studies; cross-sectional studies, clinical trials; complete studies; studies with animal models that addressed the proposed theme and that were published within the stipulated period from March 1, 2013, to March 31, 2023, in English, Portuguese and Spanish. These would later have to go through inclusion stages such as framing the type of study and exclusion criteria. DATA COLLECTION: Author's name, year of publication, study population, number of patients, analgesic, administration time, dose, and effect. CONCLUSIONS: There are in vitro and in vivo studies that link paracetamol and ibuprofen to endocrine and seminal changes that are harmful to male fertility. However, more clinical research is needed to determine the doses and timing of administration that affect fertility. The effects of aspirin on male fertility are still unclear due to the lack of studies and consistent methodologies. There is not enough research on dipyrone and its relationship with male fertility, requiring more studies in this area.

Effect of the combination of diuretics, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or metamizole (triple whammy) on hospitalisation due to acute kidney injury: A nested case-control study.

PURPOSE: Concomitant use of diuretics, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or metamizole, known as 'triple whammy' (TW), has been associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Nevertheless, there is still uncertainty on its impact in hospitalisation and mortality. The aim of the study was to analyse the association between exposure to TW and the risk of hospitalisation for AKI, all-cause mortality and the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). METHODS: A case-control study nested in a cohort of adults exposed to at least one diuretic or RAAS inhibitor between 2009 and 2018 was carried out within the Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database for Public Health Systems (BIFAP). Patients hospitalised for AKI between 2010 and 2018 (cases) were matched with up to 10 patients of the same age, sex and region of Spain who had not been hospitalised for AKI as of the date of hospitalisation for AKI of the matching case (controls). The association between TW exposure versus non-exposure to TW and outcome variables was analysed using logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 480 537 participants (44 756 cases and 435 781 controls) were included (mean age: 79 years). The risk of hospitalisation for AKI was significantly higher amongst those exposed to TW [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.36, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.32-1.40], being higher with current (aOR 1.60, 95%CI 1.52-1.69) and prolonged exposure (aOR 1.65, 95%CI 1.55-1.75). No significant association was found with the need of RRT. Unexpectedly, mortality was lower in those exposed to TW (aOR 0.81, 95%CI 0.71-0.93), which may be influenced by other causes. CONCLUSION: Vigilance should be increased when diuretics, RAAS inhibitors, and NSAIDs or metamizole are used concomitantly, especially in patients at risk such as elderly patients.

Case Report: Simultaneously Induced Neutropenia and Hemolysis After a Single Metamizole Dose.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Metamizole is a non-opioid ampyrone sulfonate compound with potent analgesic, antipyretic, and spasmolytic effects. Agranulocytosis is a rare life-threatening complication of metamizole. CASE: Here, we present the case of a 62-year-old patient who developed agranulocytosis as well as hemolysis after a single administration of metamizole. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the inherent allergic potential of metamizole and its effects on different hematopoietic cell types.

Real-world evidence for beneficial effects of dipyrone in 4,278 patients with pulmonary hypertension - Analysis of the risk of ventilation, hospitalization, and agranulocytosis.

INTRODUCTION: Dipyrone has been used as an analgesic for a century, but recently was proposed as a novel therapeutic strategy for the prevention and therapy of pulmonary hypertension (PH). The aim of this study was to analyze whether the risk for ventilation procedures and hospitalization was lower among patients with PH who used dipyrone compared to subjects who did not use dipyrone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Initially, patients with PH were retrieved from the TriNetX database, whereby subjects who used dipyrone were assigned to cohort I, and cohort II was formed by those individuals who did not use dipyrone. Both cohorts were matched for several variables. The outcomes were requirement for ventilation procedures and hospital admission, whereby the time window to record events was 5 years after diagnosis of PH. Subsequently, risk analysis was carried out, and risk ratio (RR) and odds ratio (OR) were calculated. In addition, the risk of agranulocytosis was determined for both cohorts. RESULTS: Out of 741,875 individuals diagnosed with PH 4,282 and 737,593 patients were assigned to the cohorts I and II. After matching, each cohort accounted for 4,278 individuals. Among the cohorts I and II 10 and 187 individuals required ventilation procedures. The according risks of 0.2% vs. 4.4% were significantly different (p < 0.0001; Log-Rank test). RR and OR were 0.053 and 0.051. Within the cohorts I and II 10 and 1,195 subjects required hospital admission. The risks of hospitalization of 0,4% vs. 27.9% differed significantly (p < 0.0001). RR and OR were 0.016 and 0.012. Among the cohorts I and II 47 and 66 individuals were diagnosed with agranulocytosis, whereby no significance was found (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The risk for ventilation measures and hospitalization among patients with PH was found to be significantly lower when dipyrone was used. Even though the underlying mechanisms remain unknown to date, they are supposedly mediated by an active metabolite of dipyrone. The obtained results appear to be promising for patients suffering from PH. Hence, the present study may encourage further research.

Additive or synergistic analgesic effect of metamizole on standard pain treatment at home after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A randomised controlled superiority trial.

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that the analgesic effect of metamizole is mediated at least partly by central mechanisms, including the endocannabinoid/endovanilloid system. Consequently, metamizole may have additive or even synergistic analgesic effects with paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess if triple therapy with metamizole, ibuprofen and paracetamol (MIP) is superior to double therapy with ibuprofen and paracetamol (i.p.) in treating pain at home after ambulatory arthroscopic shoulder surgery. DESIGN/SETTING/PATIENTS/INTERVENTION: In this double-blind, controlled, high-volume single centre, superiority trial, 110 patients undergoing elective ambulatory arthroscopic shoulder surgery were randomised to receive either MIP ( n  = 55) or i.p. ( n  = 55) orally for 4 days between December 2019 and November 2021. Pain intensity at movement and rest, using a numeric rating scale (NRS), perceived pain relief, use of rescue medication and adverse effects of study medication were recorded at the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and on postoperative day (POD) 1 to 4 and 7. Quality of Recovery (QoR) and satisfaction with study medication were measured at POD 7 with telephone follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measure was postoperative pain intensity on movement measured by an 11-point NRS (where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable) on POD 1. RESULTS: For the primary outcome, superiority of MIP in reducing postoperative pain at movement on POD 1 was not confirmed: mean difference NRS [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.08 (-1.00 to 0.84)]. For pain on movement and at rest, no significant differences were found between groups in the PACU nor on POD 1 to 4 or day 7. Nausea was reported significantly more frequently in the metamizole group (22.6 vs. 58.5; P  < 0.001). Other adverse effects of study medication, rescue opioid consumption, perceived pain relief, QoR at POD 7, and overall patient satisfaction were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Clinically, triple oral treatment with metamizole, paracetamol and ibuprofen is not superior to oral paracetamol and ibuprofen in multimodal pain treatment at home after ambulatory arthroscopic shoulder surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Union Clinical Trials Register 2019-002801-23 and Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04082728.

Unmasking of Metamizole-induced Liver Injury by Simult aneous Development of Characteristic Agranulocytosis.

BACKGROUND: Metamizole is one of the most used analgesic, antipyretic, and spasmolytic agents in many countries worldwide. While metamizole-induced agranulocytosis is an, albeit seldom, well-known adverse event, metamizole-associated drug-induced liver injury has been reported rarely in the literature and hence often remains unconsidered. Here, we present a unique case where metamizole-induced hepatotoxicity got unmasked by the simultaneous development of characteristic agranulocytosis. CASE REPORT: A 22-year-old woman without known conditions presented with a new onset of fever, jaundice, and maculopapular rash and explicitly denied intake of any new substances. Laboratory tests showed liver injury, granulopenia, and positive anti-nuclear and anti-mitochondrial (AMA-M2) antibodies. Liver biopsy revealed a histological pattern characteristic of drug-induced liver injury and bone marrow biopsy, the classical picture of metamizole-induced agranulocytosis. Indeed the in-depth interview of the patient unveiled metamizole consumption over the last two months. Therefore, we could diagnose metamizole-induced hepato- and myelotoxicity. Accordingly, steroid therapy led to normalization of liver parameters and stimulation with granulocyte colony- stimulating factor to leukocyte recovery. CONCLUSION: This case report is intended to increase the awareness of metamizole-associated druginduced liver injury which should always be kept in mind due to its occasionally life-threatening course. Diagnosis can be difficult particularly if anamnesis and written records are without hints for prior metamizole intake.

Metamizole-Associated Risks in Decompensated Hepatic Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Because of the increased risk of acute renal failure (ARF), the use of cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors is not recommended in patients with decompensated hepatic cirrhosis. Metamizole is not a classic COX inhibitor, but there are insufficient data to support its safe use. In this study, we investigate the effect of metamizole on the risk of ARF in these patients. METHODS: Metamizole use, ARF incidence, and patient mortality were examined in a large, retrospective, exploratory cohort and validated with data from a prospective registry. RESULTS: 523 patients were evaluated in the exploratory cohort. Metamizole use at baseline was documented in 110 cases (21%) and was independently associated with the development of ARF, severe (grade 3) ARF, and lower survival without liver transplantation at follow-up on day 28 (HR: 2.2, p < 0.001; HR: 2.8, p < 0.001; and HR: 2.6, p < 0.001, respectively). Interestingly, the risk of ARF depended on the dose of metamizole administered (HR: 1.038, p < 0.001). Compared to patients who were treated with opioids, the rate of ARF was higher in the metamizole group (49% vs. 79%, p = 0.014). An increased risk of ARF with metamizole use was also demonstrated in the independent validation cohort (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Metamizole therapy, especially at high doses, should only be used with a high level of caution in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

Liver Transplantation for Metamizole induced Acute Liver Failure.

Metamizole, or dipyrone, is a frequently prescribed analgetic drug that can cause drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Still, there are only a few metamizole-associated DILI cases (n = 61, including our study) described in the literature. So far liver transplantation has been reported in 6 patients with metamizole-induced acute liver failure. In 2020, a German group described a bigger cohort (n = 23) of metamizole-related DILI. Shortly thereafter, this issue gained wider attention as the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices published a Direct Healthcare Professional Communication, emphasizing DILI as a potential adverse event caused by metamizole. We herein report 2 patients that were admitted to our liver transplant center due to acute liver failure (ALF) in April and May 2021. Both patients reported intake of metamizole as pain medication over a few weeks. After ruling out alternative reasons for ALF and fulfilling the King's College criteria both patients received emergency liver transplantations in our center. Pathology assessment of both explants were consistent with metamizole-associated DILI. As illustrated by our 2 cases of metamizole-induced liver failure with subsequent liver transplantation, this rare but presumably often overlooked adverse drug effect of metamizole should be considered as differential diagnosis in cases of cryptogenic liver failure.

Design, synthesis and in vivo evaluation of 1,4-dioxo-2-butenyl aryl amine derivatives as a promising anti-inflammatory drug prototype.

Inflammation is a natural response of the organism to an infection, trauma, or cellular stress. Pain is the first symptom of acute and chronic inflammation. The standard class of medication to treat inflammatory pain is the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). These drugs are associated with severe side effects such as gastric ulcers, gastritis, or internal bleeding. One of NSAIDs, Dipyrone® (metamizole) is largely used in many European and South American countries despite its dubious effectivity and its withdrawal from the market of several countries. Here, aiming to identify a new anti-inflammatory drug prototype based on Dipyrone® structure, a set of 27 molecules were virtually screened, and 4 compounds containing the active metabolite 4-aminoantipyrine and 1,4-dioxo-2-butenyl fragment were selected for docking, synthesis, and biological evaluation. The selection was based on the number of H-bonds and π- π stacking interactions between the inhibitor and the amino acids within the binding site of the enzyme. Carrageenan-induced paw edema, acetic acid-induced writhing, and formalin assays were used to evaluate inflammation and pain response. The selected compounds 1-4 inhibited the involvement of biogenic amines in the formation of paw edema. Compounds 1-4 also reduced pain in the inflammatory response phase. It has to be noted that 4-AA may cause agranulocytosis, which should be borne in mind when developing drug candidates of similar structure. Our new drug prototypes based on 4-aminoantipyrine and 1,4-dioxo-2-butenyl moieties open a gate for developing a prototype of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Vasoespasmo inducido por metamizol: síndrome de Kounis, un diagnóstico que suele pasarse por alto / Metamizol-induced vasospasm: Kounis syndrome - an often overlooked diagnosis

No disponible

[Metamizol: current status in Dutch practice]. / Pijnbestrijding met metamizol in de Nederlandse praktijk.

Metamizole is a non-selective NSAID with a strong analgesic and spasmolytic effect. In the late 1970s, metamizole has been withdrawn from the market in many industrialized countries because of an allegedly unacceptable high risk of agranulocytosis. The absolute risk of metamizole-related agranulocytosis is estimated to be less than 1 per million daily doses. The incidence of agranulocytosis may be reduced by short-term use and careful consideration when prescribing to specific patient categories. Metamizole has a relatively favorable safety profile with respect to morbidity and mortality compared to other NSAIDs. In the Netherlands the official registration of metamizole has been limited for years to intravenous and postoperative use. In March 2021, the Dutch Medicine Assessment Board certified one oral formulation of metamizol under strict conditions. The debate about the wider application of (oral) metamizole in the Netherlands should be re-opened.

Metamizole Use in Children: Analysis of Drug Utilisation and Adverse Drug Reactions at a German University Hospital between 2015 and 2020.

BACKGROUND: Metamizole use is controversially discussed due to its potentially serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In Germany, however, it remains a popular analgesic and antipyretic drug. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to discuss the safety profile of metamizole in children by analysing the inpatient prescription patterns and presenting the metamizole-related ADRs at a paediatric hospital between 2015 and 2020. METHODS: Metamizole utilisation data were retrospectively analysed from electronic medical records. ADRs were prospectively recorded via the hospital's stimulated reporting system and analysed accordingly. Patients aged < 18 years admitted to one of the general wards of the department of paediatrics and adolescent medicine of a German university hospital between June 2015 and May 2020 who received at least one drug therapy within their inpatient stay were included in the analysis. Causality of ADRs was rated according to the World Health Organisation causality assessment. RESULTS: In 31.7% (3759/11,857) of the inpatient stays of 7809 patients, metamizole was administered. Metamizole exposure was highest in adolescents (37.9%) and lowest in newborns (9.9%). Overall, metamizole was administered parenterally in about 90%. Three cases of agranulocytosis, one allergic shock and one rash with possible or higher causality to metamizole treatment were reported. Three of these occurred prior to hospitalisation. All patients recovered without remaining harm. DISCUSSION: Metamizole is commonly used in paediatric inpatients in Germany. Serious ADRs occur but rarely. Continuous monitoring of drug therapy through, for example, stimulated reporting systems ensures that serious ADRs are detected, and appropriate interventions can be introduced.

Analysis of potential drug interactions in medical clinic sector in a Hospital of João Pessoa - PB

Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate drug interactions based on medical records of patients hospitalized in University Hospital Lauro Wanderley (UHLW) in João Pessoa-PB, Brazil. This was a quantitative, descriptive study with a cross-sectional design. This research was conducted in the medical clinic of the above hospital by analyzing pharmaceutical intervention in medical records. The investigated samples consisted of all medical profiles with drug interaction information of patients hospitalized from June 2016 to June 2017. Most of these drug interactions were determined and classified by Micromedex® Solutions database. This research was approved by the Ethics Committee in Institutional Human Research, protocol number 2.460.206. In total, 331 drug interactions were found in 131 medical profiles. Dipyrone, enoxaparin, sertraline, ondansetron, quetiapine, tramadol, bromopride, amitriptyline, and simvastatin were medications that showed highest interactions. According to Anatomical Therapy Classification (ATC), drugs that act on the central nervous system result in more interactions. The most prevalent interaction was between dipyrone and enoxaparin. Some limitations of this study are the lack of notifications and data on drug interactions.

Excess Mortality in Aspirin and Dipyrone (Metamizole) Co-Medicated in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Study.

Background Pain is a major issue in our aging society. Dipyrone (metamizole) is one of the most frequently used analgesics. Additionally, it has been shown to impair pharmacodynamic response to aspirin as measured by platelet function tests. However, it is not known how this laboratory effect translates to clinical outcome. Methods and Results We conducted a nationwide analysis of a health insurance database in Germany comprising 9.2 million patients. All patients with a cardiovascular event in 2014 and subsequent secondary prevention with aspirin were followed up for 36 months. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was conducted to investigate the rate of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke/transient ischemic attack between patients on aspirin-dipyrone co-medication compared with aspirin-alone medication. Permanent aspirin-alone medication was given to 26,200 patients, and 5946 patients received aspirin-dipyrone co-medication. In the inverse probability of treatment weighted sample, excess mortality in aspirin-dipyrone co-medicated patients was observed (15.6% in aspirin-only group versus 24.4% in the co-medicated group, hazard ratio [HR], 1.66 [95% CI, 1.56-1.76], P<0.0001). Myocardial infarction and stroke/transient ischemic attack were increased as well (myocardial infarction: 1370 [5.2%] versus 355 [5.9%] in aspirin-only and co-medicated groups, respectively; HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.05-1.32]; P=0.0066, relative risk [RR], 1.14; number needed to harm, 140. Stroke/transient ischemic attack, 1901 [7.3%] versus 506 [8.5%] in aspirin-only and co-medicated groups, respectively; HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.11-1.35]; P<0.0001, RR, 1.17, number needed to harm, 82). Conclusions In this observational, nationwide analysis, aspirin and dipyrone co-medication was associated with excess mortality. This was in part driven by ischemic events (myocardial infarction and stroke), which occurred more frequently in co-medicated patients as well. Hence, dipyrone should be used with caution in aspirin-treated patients for secondary prevention.

Is There an Increased Risk of Hepatotoxicity with Metamizole? A Comparative Cohort Study in Incident Users.

INTRODUCTION: The analgesic metamizole, which has been withdrawn from the market in several countries due to the risk of agranulocytosis but is still available on the market in Germany and some other countries, has been associated with liver injury in published case reports; however, epidemiological studies on the risk of liver injury are limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the risk of liver injury up to 270 days after the first start of treatment with metamizole with the corresponding risk in patients starting treatment with paracetamol, using a retrospective cohort incident user design. METHODS: The first prescription for either metamizole or paracetamol in the Intercontinental Medical Statistics (IMS)® Disease Analyzer Germany database during the study period (2009-2018) was identified in patients with at least 365 days of observation and no prior diagnosis of liver events, cancer or HIV, or treatment within the last 6 months with hepatotoxic drugs typically administered for chronic conditions. Each patient was followed for specific liver events for 90 days after the prescription. In case of a new prescription within 90 days, a new 90-day observation period started, up to a maximum of 270 days. Cox regression was used to compare the risk of liver injury in the two groups. RESULTS: Metamizole was associated with a higher risk of liver injury compared with paracetamol (adjusted hazard ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.46-1.97). Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of these findings. In all the sensitivity analyses, metamizole was still associated with a higher risk of liver injury, including an analysis where naproxen was used as a comparator instead of paracetamol. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study support previous studies suggesting that metamizole is associated with a significant risk of liver injury. Nevertheless, a possible impact of residual confounding cannot be excluded.

[A Rare Case of Intravenous Metamizole Abuse]. / Nadir Görülen Bir Vaka Olarak Intravenöz Metamizol Kötüye Kullanimi.

Given the very frequent prescription of non-opiod analgesics (NOA), their dependence potential has been a subject of research. Increased use of NOA in the last decade has led authors to publish case reports to describe the dependence potential of these agents. Metamizole (dipyrone) has become one of the most popular NOA agents, in being easily accessible and inexpensive. Its analgesic effect depends on the central inhibition of cyclo-oxigenase (COX-3) and activation of the opiodergic and cannabinoid systems. Recent research has also stressed its possible anxiolytic effects. Our Literature search indicated no previous reports regarding metamizole misuse. Case of a 41 year old female patient is presented. She had self administered increasing doses of i.v. metamizole reaching up to 10 ampules per day. Considering the risk of mortality due to the metamizole's side effect of agranulocytosis, we thought that it could be a significant contribution to the literature to present a case of a possible metamizole abuse.