Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 78
Filter
1.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 10(1): 171, 2021 12 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34949217

ABSTRACT

Duodenoscopy-associated infections occur worldwide despite strict adherence to reprocessing standards. The exact scope of the problem remains unknown because a standardized sampling protocol and uniform sampling techniques are lacking. The currently available multi-society protocol for microbial culturing by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the American Society for Microbiology, published in 2018 is too laborious for broad clinical implementation. A more practical sampling protocol would result in increased accessibility and widespread implementation. This will aid to reduce the prevalence of duodenoscope contamination. To reduce the risk of duodenoscopy-associated pathogen transmission the FDA advised four supplemental reprocessing measures. These measures include double high-level disinfection, microbiological culturing and quarantine, ethylene oxide gas sterilization and liquid chemical sterilization. When the supplemental measures were advised in 2015 data evaluating their efficacy were sparse. Over the past five years data regarding the supplemental measures have become available that place the efficacy of the supplemental measures into context. As expected the advised supplemental measures have resulted in increased costs and reprocessing time. Unfortunately, it has also become clear that the efficacy of the supplemental measures falls short and that duodenoscope contamination remains a problem. There is a lot of research into new reprocessing methods and technical applications trying to solve the problem of duodenoscope contamination. Several promising developments such as single-use duodenoscopes, electrolyzed acidic water, and vaporized hydrogen peroxide plasma are already applied in a clinical setting.


Subject(s)
Duodenoscopes/standards , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Equipment Reuse/statistics & numerical data , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/standards , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disinfection/economics , Disinfection/legislation & jurisprudence , Disinfection/methods , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Enterobacteriaceae/pathogenicity , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/prevention & control , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/transmission , Equipment Reuse/standards , Humans , Infection Control/economics , Infection Control/legislation & jurisprudence , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence
3.
Environ Mol Mutagen ; 61(6): 588-601, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32374889

ABSTRACT

Water disinfection, primarily by chlorination, is one of the greatest achievements of public health. However, more than half a century after its introduction, studies in the 1970s reported that (a) chlorine interacted with organic matter in the water to form disinfection by-products (DBPs); (b) two DBPs, chloroform and bromoform, both trihalomethanes (THMs), were rodent carcinogens; (c) three brominated THMs were mutagenic; in six studies chlorinated drinking waters in the United States and Canada were mutagenic; and (d) in one epidemiological study there was an association between bladder cancer mortality and THM exposure. This led the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to issue its first DBP regulation in 1979. Forty years later, >600 DBPs have been characterized, 20/22 have been shown to be rodent carcinogens, >100 have been shown to be genotoxic, and 1000s of water samples have been found to be mutagenic. Data support a hypothesis that long-term dermal/inhalation exposure to certain levels of the three brominated THMs, as well as oral exposure to the haloacetic acids, combined with a specific genotype may increase the risk for bladder cancer for a small but significant population group. Improved water-treatment methods and stricter regulations have likely reduced such risks over the years, and further reductions in potential risk are anticipated with the application of advanced water-treatment methods and wider application of drinking water regulations. This 40-year research effort is a remarkable example of sustained cooperation between academic and government scientists, along with public/private water companies, to find answers to a pressing public health question.


Subject(s)
Disinfection/methods , Drinking Water/analysis , Water Purification/methods , Animals , Anniversaries and Special Events , Carcinogens/analysis , Carcinogens/toxicity , Chlorine/analysis , Chlorine/toxicity , Disinfectants/analysis , Disinfectants/toxicity , Disinfection/legislation & jurisprudence , Drinking Water/adverse effects , Drinking Water/legislation & jurisprudence , Halogenation , Humans , Neoplasms/chemically induced , Public Health , Trihalomethanes/analysis , Trihalomethanes/toxicity , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Water Purification/legislation & jurisprudence
4.
Viruses ; 11(5)2019 05 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31121941

ABSTRACT

In recent years, a new potential measure against foodborne pathogenic bacteria was rediscovered-bacteriophages. However, despite all their advantages, in connection to their widespread application in the food industry, negative consequences such as an uncontrolled phage spread as well as a development of phage resistant bacteria can occur. These problems are mostly a result of long-term persistence of phages in the food production environment. As this topic has been neglected so far, this article reviews the current knowledge regarding the effectiveness of disinfectant strategies for phage inactivation and removal. For this purpose, the main commercial phage products, as well as their application fields are first discussed in terms of applicable inactivation strategies and legal regulations. Secondly, an overview of the effectiveness of disinfectants for bacteriophage inactivation in general and commercial phages in particular is given. Finally, this review outlines a possible strategy for users of commercial phage products in order to improve the effectiveness of phage inactivation and removal after application.


Subject(s)
Bacteriophages/physiology , Disinfection , Food Microbiology , Bacteriophages/drug effects , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Disinfection/legislation & jurisprudence , Disinfection/methods
5.
Sci Total Environ ; 637-638: 1607-1616, 2018 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29925195

ABSTRACT

Disinfection is an integral component of water treatment performed daily on large volumes of water worldwide. Chemical disinfection may result in the unintended production of disinfectant by-products (DBPs) due to reactions between disinfectants and natural organic matter present in the source water. Due to their potential toxicity, levels of DBPs have been strictly regulated in drinking waters for many years. With water reuse now becoming more common around the world DBPs are increasingly becoming a concern in recycled waters, where a much larger amount and variety of compounds may be formed due to a higher abundance and diversity of organic material in the source waters. Regulation of DBPs in recycled waters is limited; generally, drinking water regulations are applied in place of specific guidelines for recycled waters. Such regulations are set for only 11, commonly observed, compounds of the 600+ that may, potentially, be found. In this review an overview of current research in this area is provided, the types of compounds that have been observed, methods for their analysis and possible regulation are also discussed. Through this review it is evident that there is a knowledge gap for the occurrence of DBPs in recycled waters, especially when comparing this information to that available for drinking waters. The concentrations of DBPs observed in recycled waters are seen to be higher than those in drinking water, though still within potable threshold limits. It is clear that there is a need for the analysis and understanding of a larger suite of compounds in recycled waters, as these will most likely be the source of future, global renewable water.


Subject(s)
Disinfectants/analysis , Disinfection/methods , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Water Purification/methods , Disinfectants/standards , Disinfection/legislation & jurisprudence , Recycling , Water Pollutants, Chemical/standards , Water Purification/legislation & jurisprudence
7.
J Water Health ; 15(5): 718-728, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29040075

ABSTRACT

The New York State Department of Health developed regulations for the design and operation of spray grounds to address the potential for recreational water illnesses associated with this type of venue. The water treatment component of the new regulation was based on a first-principles approach to address the unique challenges of spray grounds. The regulation departs from traditional recreational water treatment methods by requiring a novel filtration approach and the installation of UV disinfection. The water treatment system was also required to incorporate automatic control systems to ensure the water quality is maintained with a minimum of operator involvement. The treatment process specifications were based on pathogen and contaminant loadings that are likely to be encountered at spray grounds. The regulation was finalized in 2007, giving New York State a reliable means of protecting the health of spray ground patrons.


Subject(s)
Disinfection , Filtration , Sports and Recreational Facilities , Water Microbiology , Water Purification/legislation & jurisprudence , Disinfection/legislation & jurisprudence , New York , Recreation
8.
J Water Health ; 15(1): 1-16, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28151435

ABSTRACT

Cryptosporidium is the leading cause of swimming pool outbreaks of gastroenteritis. Transmission occurs through the ingestion of oocysts that are passed in the faeces of an infected person or animal when an accidental faecal release event occurs. Cryptosporidium parasites present specific challenges for infection control as oocysts are highly resistant to chlorine levels used for pool disinfection, infected individuals can shed large numbers of oocysts, there is a long incubation period and shedding of oocysts occurs even after symptom resolution. The purposes of this review are to identify key barriers to limiting swimming pool-associated outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis and to outline needs for research and collaboration to advance co-ordinated management practices. We reviewed swimming pool-associated cryptosporidiosis outbreaks, disinfection teachniques, current regulations and the role of staff and patrons. Key barriers to limiting swimming pool-associated outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis are a lack of uniform national and international standards, poor adherence and understanding of regulations governing staff and patron behaviour, and low levels of public knowledge and awareness.


Subject(s)
Cryptosporidiosis , Cryptosporidium/physiology , Disease Outbreaks , Disinfection/standards , Swimming Pools , Water Microbiology , Cryptosporidiosis/epidemiology , Cryptosporidiosis/parasitology , Cryptosporidiosis/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/legislation & jurisprudence , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Disinfection/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans
9.
Endeavour ; 39(1): 35-43, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25701219

ABSTRACT

This article examines the relationship between theory and practice in nineteenth century English public health disinfection practice. Disinfection undertaken by local authorities and practised on objects, spaces and people became an increasingly common public health practice in the last quarter of the nineteenth century, and was part of a newly developed public health system of 'stamping out' disease as described by Hardy. Despite disinfection's key role in public health policy, it has thus far not received significant investigation or historiographical attending. This article explores the development of disinfection policy at local level, highlighting that despite commentators assumptions that increasingly exacting standards of disinfection required professional oversight rather than that of the 'amateur' public, there was a significant gap between laboratory based knowledge and evidence derived from practical experience. Laboratory conditions could not replicate those found in day-to-day disinfection, and there were myriad debates about how to create a mutually understandable scientific standard for testing. Despite increasing efforts to bring local disinfection in line with new ideas promulgated by central government and disinfection researchers, the mismatches between the two meant that there was greater divergence. This tension lay at the heart of the changes in disinfection theory and practice in the second half of the nineteenth century, and illustrate the complexities of the impact of germ theory on public health policy.


Subject(s)
Disinfection/history , Disinfection/methods , Germ Theory of Disease/history , Public Health/history , Public Health/methods , Bacteriology/history , Decontamination/history , Decontamination/legislation & jurisprudence , Decontamination/methods , Disinfection/legislation & jurisprudence , England , Fumigation/history , Fumigation/legislation & jurisprudence , Fumigation/methods , Health Policy/history , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Humans , Sanitation/history , Sanitation/legislation & jurisprudence , Sanitation/methods
10.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 20(6): E20-30, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25250760

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The potential for hepatitis B and C virus (HBV/HCV) transmission in nail salons and barbershops has been reported, but a systematic review has not been conducted. These businesses are regulated by state cosmetology or barbering boards, but adequacy of sanitary requirements has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To conduct literature review to assess risk for HBV/HCV transmission in nail salons and barbershops and to evaluate sanitary requirements in HBV/HCV prevention in these businesses in 50 states and District of Columbia. DESIGN: Several search engines were used for literature search. Studies that quantified risks associated with manicuring, pedicuring, or barbering were included. State requirements for disinfection and sterilization were reviewed and evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: For literature review, odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and confounding adjustment were extracted and evaluated. For regulation review, requirements for disinfection or sterilization for multiuse items in nail salons and barbershops were assessed according to the US federal guidelines. RESULTS: Forty-six studies were identified and 36 were included in this study. Overall, the results were not consistent on risk for HBV/HCV transmission in nail salons and barbershops. For sanitary requirements, disinfection with an Environmental Protection Agency-registered disinfectant is required in 39 states for nail salons and in 26 states for barbershops. Sterilization was described in 15 states for nail salons and in 11 states for barbershops, but the majority of these states listed it as an optional approach. Sanitary requirements are consistent in states where 1 board regulates both businesses but are substantially discrepant in states with separate boards. CONCLUSIONS: Current literature cannot confirm or exclude the risk for HBV/HCV transmission in nail salons and barbershops. Existing sanitary requirements are adequate in the majority of states, but compliance is needed to prevent HBV/HCV transmission in these businesses.


Subject(s)
Barbering/legislation & jurisprudence , Disinfection/legislation & jurisprudence , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Hepatitis B/transmission , Hepatitis C/prevention & control , Hepatitis C/transmission , Nails , Safety Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Sterilization/legislation & jurisprudence , District of Columbia , Humans , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , United States
11.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24781914

ABSTRACT

In order to protect human health against communicable diseases, the German Protection against Infection Act (IfSG) requires the use of officially approved products and methods for officially ordered disinfection, disinfestation (control of arthropods) as well as measures for the management of vertebrate pests that spread pathogens. Official approval is granted by registration in lists published by the responsible federal health authorities and only for products and methods that have been tested and found to be sufficiently effective and do not have an unacceptable impact on health and the environment (§ 18 IfSG). It is not compulsory for manufacturers to have their products and methods listed in accordance with § 18 IfSG. In particular listing is not a prerequisite for access to the German market. Users are free to choose a product as long as no officially ordered measure, i.e. disinfection, disinfestation or measures against vertebrate pests, according to § 18 IfSG applies. However, it is highly recommended to use approved products included in the abovementioned lists even for routine application, as these registered products and methods have been tested, i.e. the efficacy has been proven by means of specific, recognized and quality assured testing procedures or by expert reports which have been confirmed by independent institutions.


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Disinfection/legislation & jurisprudence , Legislation, Drug , Pest Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Pesticides , Vertebrates , Animals , Communicable Disease Control/standards , Disinfection/standards , Guidelines as Topic , Pest Control/standards
12.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 67(3): 456-67, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24080225

ABSTRACT

This review deals with three categories of active substances for disinfectant products, their modes of action (MOA), and how MOA can help predict propensity for resistance in microorganisms. Within the European Union applications for approval of disinfectants of all kinds must be submitted in a few years, and documentation on MOA and resistance must be part of those applications. Peracetic acid is an unspecific, pervasive oxidizer of C-C double bonds and reduced atoms. This MOA would imply poor chance for development of resistance in microorganisms, as borne out by the absence of such reports in the literature. The quaternary ammonium compounds (QAC's) are much more specific in their antimicrobial mechanism. Even very low concentrations cause damage to the cytoplasmic membrane due to perturbation of the bilayers by the molecules' alkyl chains. Development of microbial resistance to QAC's, as well as cross-resistance to antibiotics, are particularly well documented. The polymer PHMB is antimicrobial because it disturbs the cell membrane's bilayer by interacting with it along the surface of the membrane. Resistance to the polymer appears not to develop despite many years of use in many fields. However, PHMB's toxicity to humans upon inhalation dictates great caution when deploying the substance.


Subject(s)
Disinfectants/pharmacology , Guanidines/pharmacology , Peracetic Acid/pharmacology , Polymers/pharmacology , Quaternary Ammonium Compounds/pharmacology , Disinfectants/chemistry , Disinfectants/toxicity , Disinfection/legislation & jurisprudence , Disinfection/methods , Drug Resistance, Microbial , European Union , Government Regulation , Guanidines/toxicity , Molecular Structure , Peracetic Acid/chemistry , Peracetic Acid/toxicity , Polymers/toxicity , Quaternary Ammonium Compounds/chemistry , Quaternary Ammonium Compounds/toxicity , Structure-Activity Relationship
13.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 49(2): 357-63, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23962395

ABSTRACT

Multilayer preventative strategies have been instituted to enhance transfusion safety for patients in need of critical blood components. Presently blood safety is at its highest levels, with the implementation of precautionary/preventative measures against vCJD, bacterial and viral contamination of the blood supply. The implementation of these strategies together with advances in automation and computerization led to significant improvements in standardisation for transfusion practices. These include validation, verification, adherence to GLP and GMP and other regulatory requirements. In most European countries, universal prestorage leukodepletion is routine practice. In France proactive pathogen inactivation treatments [PITs] have been implemented emphasizing patient safety. This at least conceptually reduces the risk of transfusing viable WBCs, emerging bacteria and viruses, all with potential transfusion complications. In the UK, prion removal filters for red cell products are used selectively for special groups of patients. Some research establishments are exploring the potential impact of pathogen inactivation of whole blood or red cell components, using the new generation of S-303 PIT and the prion removal filters in combination. It needs to be determined whether such a combined strategy, applied synergistically, enhances red cell transfusion safety without compromising the overall criteria of acceptability. It is necessary to critically examine the impact of a new generation of PIT technologies, which may exacerbate the red cell storage lesion and cause the development of undesirable antibodies in the recipient. The development of innovative laboratory tools is vital to study impacts of these measures on the quality of stored blood and their clinical outcome. The ultimate aim of red cell transfusion is to provide oxygen enriched red blood cells to the microcirculations and tissues. Definitive studies are needed to establish the potential unforeseen negative long term toxicity, overall efficacy/quality and the clinical outcome of treated stored blood.


Subject(s)
Blood Preservation/methods , Blood Safety/methods , Disinfection/methods , Erythrocytes , Blood Preservation/standards , Blood Safety/standards , Disinfection/legislation & jurisprudence , Disinfection/standards , France , Humans
14.
Z Orthop Unfall ; 151(3): 291-5, 2013 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23771333

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The German tissue law creates a different and more difficult situation for German musculoskeletal tissue banks. The objective aim of the new regulations was an increased safety and a reduction of viral and non-viral disease transmissions. In the authors' case, the government officials demanded a thermodisinfection for human femur heads. As a consequence of the requirements we aimed at an analysis of the cost-effectiveness of an admission according to § 20 b and c "Arzneimittelgesetz" (AMG) and implementation of the "lobator bonebank system™". METHOD: We calculated the working hour requirements for all medical staff involved in the tissue procedure. Additional costs were the current consumptions of two freezers (cooling power - 80 °C) for one year, the current consumption of one thermodisinfection process, the material cost of one disinfection and documentation set, expenses for laboratory examinations and the non-recurrent expenses for the admission according to § 20 b and c AMG and the "lobator bonebank system". Non-recurrent expenses were calculated for five years according to 610 tissue donations. We compared the overall costs for one processed femur head with the charges of an industrial chemical treating and irradiation. RESULTS: Expenses for medical doctors were 14.13 € and for nurses 3.71 €. Energy costs were 15.20 € for each stored femur head. Costs for the disinfection and documentation sets were 105.15 €, laboratory expenses were 107.25 €. The non-recurring fee for the admission according to § 20 b and c AMG was 2650 €, the cost for the lobator-sd2 was 12 495 €. The overall expenses for one disinfected femur head were 274.82 € compared to 535.23 € in a tissue service. CONCLUSION: To comply with legal requirements, operating expenses of the new tissue act increased. Nevertheless we could still prove the cost-effectiveness of a local bone bank in Germany.


Subject(s)
Bone Banks/legislation & jurisprudence , Disinfection/economics , Disinfection/legislation & jurisprudence , Guideline Adherence/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/economics , Workload/economics , Bone Banks/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Germany , Government Regulation , Hot Temperature , Humans , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/legislation & jurisprudence , Workload/legislation & jurisprudence
15.
Am J Infect Control ; 41(5 Suppl): S72-6, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23622754

ABSTRACT

The United States Environmental Protection Agency regulates pesticidal products, including products with antimicrobial activity. Test guidelines have been established to inform manufacturers of which methodology is appropriate to support a specific efficacy claim. This paper highlights efforts designed to improve current methods and the development and assessment of new test methods.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Disinfection/standards , Public Health/standards , United States Environmental Protection Agency/standards , Anti-Infective Agents/standards , Disinfectants/standards , Disinfection/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
16.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22842890

ABSTRACT

Due to the Infectious Disease Prevention Act, public health services in Germany are obliged to check the infection prevention in hospitals and other medical facilities as well as in nursing homes. In Frankfurt/Main, Germany, standardized control visits have been performed for many years. In 2011 focus was laid on cleaning and disinfection of surfaces. All 41 nursing homes were checked according to a standardized checklist covering quality of structure (i.e. staffing, hygiene concept), quality of process (observation of the cleaning processes in the homes) and quality of output, which was monitored by checking the cleaning of fluorescent marks which had been applied some days before and should have been removed via cleaning in the following days before the final check. In more than two thirds of the homes, cleaning personnel were salaried, in one third external personnel were hired. Of the homes 85% provided service clothing and all of them offered protective clothing. All homes had established hygiene and cleaning concepts, however, in 15% of the homes concepts for the handling of Norovirus and in 30% concepts for the handling of Clostridium difficile were missing. Regarding process quality only half of the processes observed, i.e. cleaning of hand contact surfaces, such as handrails, washing areas and bins, were correct. Only 44% of the cleaning controls were correct with enormous differences between the homes (0-100%). The correlation between quality of process and quality of output was significant. There was good quality of structure in the homes but regarding quality of process and outcome there was great need for improvement. This was especially due to faults in communication and coordination between cleaning personnel and nursing personnel. Quality outcome was neither associated with the number of the places for residents nor with staffing. Thus, not only quality of structure but also quality of process and outcome should be checked by the public health services.


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Disinfection/legislation & jurisprudence , Disinfection/standards , Homes for the Aged/legislation & jurisprudence , Homes for the Aged/standards , Household Work/legislation & jurisprudence , Household Work/standards , Nursing Homes/legislation & jurisprudence , Nursing Homes/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Aged , Caliciviridae Infections/prevention & control , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections/prevention & control , Clostridium Infections/transmission , Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Germany , Health Services Research , Humans , Norovirus , Quality Improvement/legislation & jurisprudence , Universal Precautions/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...