ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Diverticulitis is a complex, heterogeneous disease process that affects a diverse population of patients. In the elective management of this disease, treatment guidelines have shifted toward patient-centered, individualized decision-making. It is not known what challenges surgeons face as they approach these nuanced treatment decisions in practice. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify opportunities to support colorectal surgeons in elective diverticulitis treatment. DESIGN: This was a qualitative study using standardized, semistructured interviews to explore the perspectives of 29 colorectal surgeons recruited using a purposive sampling technique. Data were analyzed using an "open-coding" approach. SETTINGS: Interviews with a national sample of colorectal surgeons were conducted from a single center using an online video platform. PATIENTS: This study did not involve patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Interviews explored surgeons' experiences treating diverticulitis in the elective setting, focusing on perceived challenges in providing patient-centered care as well as opportunities to improve treatment decisions. RESULTS: Our qualitative analysis identified an overarching challenge in elective diverticulitis management for surgeons: difficulty ensuring adequate patient understanding of the risks and benefits of various treatments. This was thought to be due to 1) preexisting patient expectations about treatment and 2) lack of data regarding long-term treatment outcomes. Surgeons identified 2 potential opportunities to combat these challenges: 1) patient education and 2) additional research regarding treatment outcomes, with potential for the development of diverticulitis-specific decision support tools. LIMITATIONS: These results are based on a national sample of colorectal surgeons, but they capture qualitative data that is not intended to provide generalizable findings. CONCLUSIONS: As surgeons work toward providing individualized care for diverticulitis patients, they find it difficult to adequately counsel patients regarding the patient-specific risks of various treatments. The results of this study identify specific contributors to this problem as well as potential targets for intervention, which can guide future efforts to support surgeons in providing patient-centered care. See Video Abstract . DESAFOS Y OPORTUNIDADES EN EL MANEJO ELECTIVO DE LA DIVERTICULITIS PERSPECTIVAS DE UNA MUESTRA NACIONAL DE CIRUJANOS COLORRECTALES: ANTECEDENTES:La diverticulitis es un proceso patológico complejo y heterogéneo que afecta a una población diversa de pacientes. En el manejo electivo de esta enfermedad, las pautas de tratamiento se han desplazado hacia una toma de decisiones individualizada y centrada en el paciente. No se sabe qué desafíos enfrentan los cirujanos al abordar estas decisiones de tratamiento matizadas en la práctica.OBJETIVO:Identificar oportunidades para apoyar a los cirujanos colorrectales en el tratamiento electivo de la diverticulitis.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio cualitativo que utilizó entrevistas semiestructuradas estandarizadas para explorar las perspectivas de 29 cirujanos colorrectales reclutados mediante una técnica de muestreo intencional. Los datos se analizaron utilizando un enfoque de "codificación abierta".ESCENARIO:Las entrevistas con una muestra nacional de cirujanos colorrectales se realizaron desde un solo centro utilizando una plataforma de video en línea.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las entrevistas exploraron las experiencias de los cirujanos en el tratamiento de la diverticulitis en el entorno electivo, centrándose en los desafíos percibidos en la prestación de atención centrada en el paciente, así como en las oportunidades para mejorar las decisiones de tratamiento.RESULTADOS:Nuestro análisis cualitativo identificó un desafío general en el manejo de la diverticulitis electiva para los cirujanos: la dificultad para asegurar que el paciente comprenda adecuadamente los riesgos y beneficios de los diversos tratamientos. Se pensó que esto se debía a 1) las expectativas preexistentes del paciente sobre el tratamiento y 2) la falta de datos sobre los resultados del tratamiento a largo plazo. Los cirujanos identificaron dos oportunidades potenciales para combatir estos desafíos: 1) educación del paciente y 2) investigación adicional sobre los resultados del tratamiento, con potencial para el desarrollo de herramientas de apoyo a la toma de decisiones específicas para la diverticulitis.LIMITACIONES:Estos resultados se basan en una muestra nacional de cirujanos colorrectales, pero capturan datos cualitativos que no pretenden proporcionar hallazgos generalizables.CONCLUSIONES:A medida que los cirujanos trabajan para brindar atención individualizada a los pacientes con diverticulitis, les resulta difícil aconsejar adecuadamente a los pacientes sobre los riesgos específicos de los pacientes para los diversos tratamientos. Los resultados de este estudio identifican contribuyentes específicos a este problema, así como objetivos potenciales para la intervención, que pueden guiar los esfuerzos futuros para ayudar a los cirujanos a brindar atención centrada en el paciente. (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Diverticulitis , Surgeons , Humans , Diverticulitis/surgery , Diverticulitis/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Colectomy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Much of what is known about the effects of alcohol and tobacco use on diverticular disease derives from studies of asymptomatic diverticulosis or complicated diverticulitis. We examined smoking and alcohol consumption and risk of incident diverticulitis in a large cohort of women. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 84,232 women in the Nurses' Health Study II (NHS II) who were 39-52 years old and without known diverticulitis at baseline in 2003. Smoking was ascertained every 2 years and alcohol use every 4 years. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazards ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: During 1,139,660 person-years of follow up, we identified 3018 incident cases of diverticulitis. After adjustment for other risk factors, current (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.39) and past smoking (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.11-1.30) were associated with increased risk of diverticulitis when compared with never smokers. Women who consumed ≥30 g/d of alcohol had a multivariate HR of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.05-1.50) when compared with women who did not drink. A joint analysis of smoking and alcohol found that individuals who ever smoked and consumed ≥15 g/d of alcohol were at highest risk of diverticulitis (multivariate HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.16-2.21), compared with participants who never smoked and reported no alcohol use. CONCLUSIONS: In this large prospective study of women, smoking and alcohol consumption were associated with an increased risk of incident diverticulitis. These data highlight additional modifiable risk factors for diverticulitis that may aid in prevention.
Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking , Diverticulitis , Smoking , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Adult , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Diverticulitis/epidemiology , Diverticulitis/etiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/adverse effects , Risk Assessment , Incidence , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Introducción: La elección de las técnicas de imagen en el diagnóstico de la diverticulitis aguda (DA) es un motivo de controversia. Los objetivos del estudio fueron conocer las preferencias de los radiólogos y el grado de utilización de las distintas técnicas en su manejo radiológico. Métodos: Se difundió una encuesta por Internet a través de la Sociedad Española de Diagnóstico por Imagen del Abdomen (SEDIA) y Twitter, con preguntas sobre ámbito de trabajo, protocolización, preferencias personales y la realidad asistencial en el manejo radiológico de la DA. Resultados: Se obtuvieron 186 respuestas. El 72% de los radiólogos encuestados trabaja en servicios organizados por «órgano y sistema» (S-OS). Existe protocolo de manejo de DA en un el 48% de los servicios, siendo en el 47,5% la ecografía la técnica de inicio. El 73% de los encuestados cree que la ecografía debería ser la primera opción diagnóstica, pero en realidad esto solo se efectúa en un 24% de los servicios, realizándose tomografía computarizada en el 32,8%, con diferencias significativas en horario de guardia. La clasificación más utilizada es la de Hinchey (75%). El 96% de los encuestados desearía un consenso de especialidad para utilizar la misma clasificación. Existe mayor tasa de protocolización, utilización de clasificaciones y mayor creencia en la ecografía como técnica inicial en S-OS y en hospitales con más de 500 camas. Conclusiones: Hay una gran variabilidad en el manejo radiológico de la DA, con divergencias en los protocolos utilizados y entre las opiniones de los radiólogos y la práctica clínica real.(AU)
Introduction: The choice of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis is controversial. This study aimed to determine radiologists preferences for different imaging techniques in the management of acute diverticulitis and the extent to which they use the different radiologic techniques for this purpose. Methods: An online survey was disseminated through the Spanish Society of Abdominal Imaging (Sociedad Española de Diagnóstico por Imagen del Abdomen (SEDIA)) and Twitter. The survey included questions about respondents working environments, protocolization, personal preferences, and actual practice in the radiological management of acute diverticulitis. Results: A total of 186 responses were obtained, 72% from radiologists working in departments organized by organ/systems. Protocols for managing acute diverticulitis were in force in 48% of departments. Ultrasonography was the initial imaging technique in 47.5%, and 73% of the respondents considered that ultrasonography should be the first-choice technique; however, in practice, ultrasonography was the initial imaging technique in only 24% of departments. Computed tomography was the first imaging technique in 32.8% of departments, and its use was significantly more common outside normal working hours. The most frequently employed classification was the Hinchey classification (75%). Nearly all (96%) respondents expressed a desire for a consensus within the specialty about using the same classification. Hospitals with>500 beds and those organized by organ/systems had higher rates of protocolization, use of classifications, and belief that ultrasonography is the best first-line imaging technique. Conclusions: The radiologic management of acute diverticulitis varies widely, with differences in the protocols used, radiologists opinions, and actual clinical practice.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Diverticulitis/diagnostic imaging , Diverticulitis/etiology , Radiologists , Abdominal Pain/diagnostic imaging , Emergency Service, Hospital , Surveys and Questionnaires , Radiography , Ultrasonography , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The etiology of diverticulitis is multifactorial and poorly understood. We estimated the familiality of diverticulitis using the Utah Population Database, a statewide database linking medical records with genealogy data. STUDY DESIGN: We identified patients with diverticulitis diagnosed between 1998 and 2018 and age- and sex-matched controls in the Utah Population Database. Risk of diverticulitis in family members of patients and controls was calculated using multivariable Poisson models. We performed exploratory analyses to determine the association of familial diverticulitis with severity of disease and age of onset. RESULTS: The study population included 9,563 diverticulitis patients (with 229,647 relatives) and 10,588 controls (with 265,693 relatives). Relatives of patients were more likely to develop diverticulitis (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.5, 95% CI 1.4 to 1.6) compared with relatives of controls. There was an elevated risk of diverticulitis among first-degree (IRR 2.6, 95% CI 2.3 to 3.0), second-degree (IRR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.6), and third-degree relatives of patients (IRR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.4). Complicated diverticulitis was more common among relatives of patients compared with relatives of controls (IRR 1.6, 95% CI 1.4 to 1.8). Age at diverticulitis diagnosis was similar between groups (relatives of patients 0.2 years older than relatives of controls, 95% CI -0.5 to 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the first-, second-, and third-degree relatives of diverticulitis patients are at elevated risk of developing diverticulitis. This information may aid surgeons in counseling patients and family members about diverticulitis risk and can inform the development of future risk-stratification tools. Further work is needed to clarify the causal role and relative contribution of various genetic, lifestyle, and environmental factors in the development of diverticulitis.
Subject(s)
Diverticulitis , Family , Humans , Infant , Case-Control Studies , Incidence , Diverticulitis/etiology , Diverticulitis/genetics , Utah/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Diverticular disease, including diverticulitis, begins when the patient becomes symptomatic. Sigmoid diverticulitis corresponds to inflammation/infection of a diverticulum of the sigmoid colon. Among diverticulosis patients, 4.3% develop diverticulitis, a frequent pathology that can entail major functional disorders. Following sigmoid diverticulitis, few studies have assessed functional disorders and quality of life, a multidimensional concept comprising physical, psychological and mental dimensions, as well as social relations. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work is to report current published data on the quality of life of patients having had sigmoid diverticulitis. RESULTS: Following uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis, long-term quality of life does not substantially differ between patients having undergone antibiotic therapy and those having only received symptomatic treatment. As for patients having experienced recurrent events, their quality of life seems improved by elective surgery. Following Hinchey I/II sigmoid diverticulitis, elective surgery seems to improve quality of life, notwithstanding a 10% risk of postoperative complications. Following sigmoid diverticulitis, while emergency surgery seems not to have greater impact on quality of life than elective surgery, the surgical technique employed in an emergency setting seems to have an impact, particularly with regard to the physical and mental components of quality of life. CONCLUSION: Assessment of quality of life is of fundamental importance in diverticular disease and should orient operative indications, particularly in an elective context.
Subject(s)
Diverticulitis, Colonic , Diverticulitis , Diverticulum , Laparoscopy , Sigmoid Diseases , Humans , Colon, Sigmoid/surgery , Colon, Sigmoid/pathology , Quality of Life , Laparoscopy/methods , Diverticulitis/surgery , Diverticulitis/etiology , Diverticulitis/pathology , Elective Surgical Procedures , Diverticulum/surgery , Diverticulitis, Colonic/surgery , Sigmoid Diseases/surgeryABSTRACT
Diverticulosis and the subsequent progression to diverticular disease and diverticulitis is becoming more prevalent in western countries. The cause for this progression is not known. Diverticulitis is a significant health burden - both financially to healthcare systems, and to the patients it affects in terms of morbidity. There is a dearth of research pertaining to diverticulitis and its impact on continence. This article examines the parallels between irritable bowel syndrome and diverticular disease, which have many symptom similarities, the overlap between the conditions, and the impact on continence. Current studies regarding the role of fibre in managing diverticular disease are also discussed.
Subject(s)
Diverticular Diseases , Diverticulitis , Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Humans , Diverticulitis/diagnosis , Diverticulitis/etiology , Diverticular Diseases/complications , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/complications , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The role of the microbiota in diverticulosis and diverticular disease is underexplored. This systematic review aimed to assess all literature pertaining to the microbiota and metabolome associations in asymptomatic diverticulosis, symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD), and diverticulitis pathophysiology. METHODS: Seven databases were searched for relevant studies published up to September 28, 2022. Data were screened in Covidence and extracted to Excel. Critical appraisal was undertaken using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for case/control studies. RESULTS: Of the 413 papers screened by title and abstract, 48 full-text papers were reviewed in detail with 12 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Overall, alpha and beta diversity were unchanged in diverticulosis; however, significant changes in alpha diversity were evident in diverticulitis. A similar Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes ratio compared with controls was reported across studies. The genus-level comparisons showed no relationship with diverticular disease. Butyrate-producing microbial species were decreased in abundance, suggesting a possible contribution to the pathogenesis of diverticular disease. Comamonas species was significantly increased in asymptomatic diverticulosis patients who later developed diverticulitis. Metabolome analysis reported significant differences in diverticulosis and SUDD, with upregulated uracil being the most consistent outcome in both. No significant differences were reported in the mycobiome. CONCLUSION: Overall, there is no convincing evidence of microbial dysbiosis in colonic diverticula to suggest that the microbiota contributes to the pathogenesis of asymptomatic diverticulosis, SUDD, or diverticular disease. Future research investigating microbiota involvement in colonic diverticula should consider an investigation of mucosa-associated microbial changes within the colonic diverticulum itself.
Subject(s)
Diverticular Diseases , Diverticulitis , Diverticulosis, Colonic , Diverticulum, Colon , Microbiota , Humans , Diverticulosis, Colonic/etiology , Diverticulitis/etiology , Diverticular Diseases/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recent data based on large databases show that bowel preparation (BP) is associated with improved outcomes in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. However, it remains unclear whether BP in elective colectomies would lead to similar results in patients with diverticulitis. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether bowel preparation affected the surgical site infections (SSI) and anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients with diverticulitis undergoing elective colectomies. STUDY DESIGN: We identified 16,380 diverticulitis patients who underwent elective colectomies from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) colectomy targeted database (2012-2017). Multivariate logistic regression models were employed to investigate the impact of different bowel preparation strategies on postoperative complications, including SSI and AL. RESULTS: In the identified population, a total of 2524 patients (15.4%) received no preparation (NP), 4715 (28.8%) mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) alone, 739 (4.5%) antibiotic bowel preparation (ABP) alone, and 8402 (51.3%) MBP + ABP. Compared to NP, patients who received any type of bowel preparations showed a significantly decreased risk of SSI and AL after adjustment for potential confounders (SSI: MBP [OR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.70-0.96], ABP [0.69, 95%CI: 0.52-0.92]; AL: MBP [OR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.51-0.86], ABP [0.56, 95%CI: 0.34-0.93]), where the combination type of MBP + ABP had the strongest effect (SSI:OR = 0.58, 95%CI:0.50-0.67; AL:OR = 0.46, 95%CI:0.36-0.59). The significantly decreased risk of 30-day mortality was observed in the bowel preparation of MBP + ABP only (OR = 0.32, 95%CI: 0.13-0.79). After the further stratification by surgery procedures, patients who received MBP + ABP showed consistently lower risk for both SSI and AL when undergoing open and laparoscopic surgeries (Open: SSI [OR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.37-0.69], AL [OR = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.25-0.91]; Laparoscopic: SSI [OR = 0.58, 95%CI: 0.47-0.72, AL [OR = 0.49, 95%CI: 0.35-0.68]). CONCLUSIONS: MBP + ABP for diverticulitis patients undergoing elective open or laparoscopic colectomies was associated with decreased risk of SSI, AL, and 30-day mortality. Benefits of MBP + ABP for diverticulitis patients underwent robotic surgeries warrant further investigation.
Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Diverticulitis , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cathartics/therapeutic use , Colectomy/adverse effects , Colectomy/methods , Diverticulitis/drug therapy , Diverticulitis/etiology , Diverticulitis/surgery , Humans , Preoperative Care/methods , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & controlABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Danish guidelines recommend colonoscopy after a case of acute diverticulitis to exclude colorectal cancer (CRC), but evidence in support this practice is limited. A series of studies has reported a low incidence of CRC in patients after they presented with acute diverticulitis, especially in uncomplicated cases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of CRC after acute diverticulitis detected during colonoscopy. METHODS: All patients seen between January 2010 and November 2017 with a first episode of acute diverticulitis and a subsequent computed tomography and colonoscopy were included. RESULTS: A total of 332 patients were included in the study. The incidence of CRC after a case of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis was 0.8%. The incidence of malignancy was 2.8% in the group of patients with complicated diverticulitis. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a low risk of CRC after a case of acute diverticulitis and no cases of CRC in patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis without clinical symptoms of CRC. This indicates that revising guidelines in regards to follow-up after diverticulitis may be warranted. FUNDING: none. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Diverticulitis, Colonic , Diverticulitis , Colonoscopy/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiology , Diverticulitis/complications , Diverticulitis/etiology , Diverticulitis, Colonic/complications , Diverticulitis, Colonic/diagnostic imaging , Diverticulitis, Colonic/epidemiology , Humans , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Diverticulosis of the appendix (DA) is a rare pathological finding that clinically imitates acute appendicitis and is most commonly found in adult males with chronic abdominal pain. It has a higher rate of perforation compared to acute appendicitis (84% vs 12%, P<0.01), and is consequently associated with a higher rate of mortality. Appendiceal diverticulitis has been found to have a significant association with incidental appendiceal neoplasms, therefore elective prophylactic appendectomy is recommended to prevent the risk of complications and to rule out the possibility of a coexisting neoplasm. Meticulous gross examination in addition to thorough histological examination of the entire appendectomy specimen by pathologists is essential in order to identify diverticula. We present two female patients with signs and symptoms consistent with acute appendicitis, they were found to have appendiceal diverticulitis on pathologic evaluation.
Subject(s)
Appendiceal Neoplasms , Appendicitis , Appendix , Diverticulitis , Diverticulum , Acute Disease , Adult , Appendectomy , Appendiceal Neoplasms/pathology , Appendicitis/diagnosis , Appendicitis/etiology , Appendicitis/surgery , Appendix/pathology , Diverticulitis/diagnosis , Diverticulitis/etiology , Diverticulitis/surgery , Diverticulum/complications , Female , Humans , Incidental Findings , MaleABSTRACT
Acute diverticulitis is one of the leading gastrointestinal causes for hospitalization. The incidence of acute diverticulitis has been increasing in recent years, especially in patients under 50 years old. Historically, acute diverticulitis in younger patients was felt to represent a separate entity, being more virulent and associated with a higher rate of recurrence. Accordingly, young patients were often managed differently to older counterparts. Our understanding of the natural history of this condition has evolved, and current clinical practice guidelines suggest age should not alter management. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the changing epidemiology of acute diverticulitis, consider potential explanations for the observed increased incidence in younger patients, as well as review the natural history of acute diverticulitis in the younger population.
Subject(s)
Diverticulitis, Colonic , Diverticulitis , Acute Disease , Diverticulitis/diagnosis , Diverticulitis/epidemiology , Diverticulitis/etiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , RecurrenceABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of diverticulitis and gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) in RA treated with tocilizumab (TCZ) compared with rituximab (RTX) and abatacept (ABA). METHODS: We conducted a population-based study using three observational French registries on TCZ, RTX and ABA in RA. Using a propensity score approach, we compared the risk of diverticulitis or GIP in these patients. RESULTS: With inverse probability weighting, there was an increased risk of diverticulitis in TCZ-treated patients compared with RTX- or ABA-treated patients [hazard ratio (HR)=3.1 (95% CI: 1.5, 6.3), P =0.002]. Moreover, patients treated with TCZ had also an increased risk of GIP due to diverticulitis compared with those treated with RTX or ABA [HR=3.8 (1.1-13.6), P =0.04], resulting in an overall increased risk of GIP [HR=2.9 (1.1-7.8), P =0.03], while no significant increased risk of GIP due to any other aetiology was found in TCZ treated patients. Diverticulitis and GIP occurred earlier with TCZ than other drugs after the last perfusion (P =0.01), with atypical clinical presentation (slow transit in 30%, P =0.04) and lower acute-phase reactants at the time of the event (P =0.005). CONCLUSION: TCZ for RA was associated with increased odds of diverticulitis as well as GIP due to diverticulitis as compared with RTX and ABA. Our study confirms the increased odds of GIP in patients receiving TCZ, which might be explained by an increased risk of diverticulitis with misleading clinical presentation.
Subject(s)
Abatacept/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Diverticulitis/etiology , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Rituximab/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Diverticulitis/epidemiology , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Intestinal Perforation/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , RegistriesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Diverticulitis is an acute inflammatory process that affects individuals with diverticular disease. Given the sharp increase in the diagnostic rate of such a pathological process, there was also an increased interest in elucidating the possible causes related to the development of this clinical condition. Among the main factors investigated, diet excels, the object of study of this integrative literature review. METHODS: After searching the virtual health library and PubMed databases, five prospective cohort studies were selected that best answered the guiding question: "Is there a relationship between diet and the incidence of diverticulitis?". RESULTS: It was observed that the high intake of red meat and the low intake of dietary fiber were the most strongly associated dietary factors with the incidence of this inflammatory process. CONCLUSION: Therefore, it is evident that choosing healthy eating habits can considerably reduce the incidence of diverticulitis and, consequently, potentially more serious complications directly related to it.
Subject(s)
Diverticulitis , Diet/adverse effects , Dietary Fiber , Diverticulitis/etiology , Feeding Behavior , Humans , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Diverticulitis is an acute inflammatory process that affects individuals with diverticular disease. Given the sharp increase in the diagnostic rate of such a pathological process, there was also an increased interest in elucidating the possible causes related to the development of this clinical condition. Among the main factors investigated, diet excels, the object of study of this integrative literature review. METHODS: After searching the virtual health library and PubMed databases, five prospective cohort studies were selected that best answered the guiding question: "Is there a relationship between diet and the incidence of diverticulitis?". RESULTS: It was observed that the high intake of red meat and the low intake of dietary fiber were the most strongly associated dietary factors with the incidence of this inflammatory process. CONCLUSION: Therefore, it is evident that choosing healthy eating habits can considerably reduce the incidence of diverticulitis and, consequently, potentially more serious complications directly related to it.
RESUMO CONTEXTO: A diverticulite é um processo inflamatório agudo que afeta indivíduos com doença diverticular. Diante do acentuado aumento da taxa diagnóstica desse processo patológico, também houve o aumento do interesse em elucidar as possíveis causas relacionadas ao desenvolvimento dessa condição clínica. Entre os principais fatores investigados, destaca-se a dieta; objeto de estudo desta revisão integrativa da literatura. MÉTODOS: Após pesquisa nas bases de dados da biblioteca virtual em saúde e PubMed, foram selecionados cinco estudos de coorte prospectivos que melhor responderam à questão norteadora "Há relação entre dieta e incidência de diverticulite?". RESULTADOS E CONCLUSÃO: Observou-se que o alto consumo de carnes vermelhas e o baixo consumo de fibra alimentar são os fatores dietéticos mais fortemente associados à incidência desse processo inflamatório. Fica evidente, portanto, que a escolha de hábitos alimentares saudáveis pode reduzir consideravelmente a incidência de diverticulite e, consequentemente, de possíveis complicações mais graves diretamente relacionadas a ela.
Subject(s)
Humans , Diverticulitis/etiology , Dietary Fiber , Prospective Studies , Diet/adverse effects , Feeding BehaviorABSTRACT
Diverticulitis and hemorrhoidal proctitis in the population are significant public health problems. We studied the potential association between the intake of certain plant foods and diverticulitis or hemorrhoidal episodes through a case-control study including 410 cases and 401 controls. We used a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. The intake was additionally quantified according to a 24 h recall. The plant foods or derived food products were categorized by their main chemical components into ethanol, caffeine/theine/theobromine, capsaicin, alliin, acids, eugenol, and miscellaneous foods such as curcumin. The mean score for overall intake of plant foods under consideration was 6.3 points, and this was significantly higher in cases (8.5) than in controls (4.1). Overall intake was similar in cases presenting with diverticulitis or hemorrhoidal proctitis. Cases had 13 times the odds of being in the upper quartile for overall intake (>7 points), compared to controls. Explanatory logistic regression models showed that the strongest association with diverticulitis and hemorrhoidal proctitis was shown by the chemical food group of capsaicin, followed by ethanol, eugenol, caffeine/theine/theobromine, and acids. Neither alliin nor miscellaneous food groups showed any association. High, frequent consumption of capsaicin, followed by ethanol, eugenol, caffeine/theine/theobromine, and acids increase the risk of diverticulitis and hemorrhoidal proctitis.
Subject(s)
Diet/adverse effects , Diverticulitis/epidemiology , Hemorrhoids/epidemiology , Plants, Edible/adverse effects , Proctitis/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Caffeine/adverse effects , Capsaicin/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Diet Surveys , Diverticulitis/etiology , Ethanol/adverse effects , Eugenol/adverse effects , Female , Hemorrhoids/etiology , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Proctitis/etiology , Risk Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
Recent evidence showed that dietary habits play a role as risk factors for the development of diverticular complications. This systematic review aims to assess the effect of dietary habits in the prevention of diverticula complications (i.e., acute diverticulitis and diverticula bleeding) in patients with diverticula disease. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched up to 19 January 2021, 330 records were identified, and 8 articles met the eligibility criteria and were subjected to data extraction. The quality of the studies was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment form. No study meets the criteria for being a high-quality study. A high intake of fiber was associated to a decreased risk of diverticulitis or hospitalization due to diverticular disease, with a protective effect for fruits and cereal fiber, but not for vegetable fiber; whereas, a high red meat consumption and a generally Western dietary pattern were associated with an increased risk of diverticulitis. Alcohol use seemed to be associated to diverticular bleeding, but not to recurrent diverticulitis or diverticular complications. Further high-quality studies are needed to better define these associations. It is mandatory to ascertain the role of dietary habits for the development of recurrent acute diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding.
Subject(s)
Diverticulitis/prevention & control , Diverticulosis, Colonic/complications , Feeding Behavior/physiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Diet, Western/adverse effects , Dietary Fiber/administration & dosage , Diverticulitis/epidemiology , Diverticulitis/etiology , Diverticulitis/physiopathology , Diverticulosis, Colonic/physiopathology , Edible Grain , Fruit , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/physiopathology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Meat/adverse effects , Recurrence , VegetablesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recent data shows a significantly increased risk of diverticulosis among smokers. There is limited data on the association between tobacco smoking and diverticulitis. We aim to determine in-hospital outcomes, length of hospital stay, and resource utilization in a contemporary cohort of diverticulitis patients based on tobacco smoking status. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed by utilizing the National Inpatient Sample database (2016 and 2017) and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes to identify the patients with the principal diagnosis of diverticulitis and smoking. We assessed all-cause in-hospital mortality, morbidity, length of hospital stay (LOS), and total costs between propensity-matched groups of tobacco smokers vs. nonsmokers with diverticulitis. RESULTS: We identified 442,273 diverticulitis patients, of whom 96,864 were tobacco smokers, and 345,409 were nonsmokers. Between the two groups, in-hospital mortality was not significant (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.38-2.6; P = 0.98). Tobacco smokers with diverticulitis have higher odds of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.4-3.8; P = 0.01), peritonitis (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.9-3.3; P = 0.00), intestinal obstruction (OR 1.6, 95% CI 2.8-7.6; P = 0.00), sepsis (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.05-4.4; P = 0.03), and shock requiring vasopressor (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.2; P = 0.00). In tobacco smokers with complicated diverticulitis, there were higher odds of LGIB (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.6; P = 0.00), sepsis (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.05-4.4; P = 0.03), and colectomy (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.2; P = 0.00). In-hospital mortality was not significant in smokers with complicated diverticulitis (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.78-1.9; P = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: In this propensity-matched analysis, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality between tobacco smokers vs. nonsmokers with diverticulitis. Smoking has been associated with an increased incidence of complications in diverticulitis with a higher length of hospital stay and resource utilization.
Subject(s)
Diverticulitis , Inpatients , Diverticulitis/epidemiology , Diverticulitis/etiology , Humans , Length of Stay , Retrospective Studies , Tobacco SmokingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Diverticular disease has been linked to obesity. Recent studies have assessed the role of visceral adiposity with diverticulitis and its complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of quantitative radiological measures of visceral adiposity in patients with diverticulitis with vital signs, biochemistry results, uncomplicated versus complicated diverticulitis and its interventions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients with diverticulitis admitted from November 2015 to April 2018 at a single institution was performed. Data collected included demographics, vital signs, biochemistry results, CT scan findings and management outcomes. The patients were divided into uncomplicated (U) and complicated diverticulitis (C) groups. Visceral fat area (VFA), subcutaneous fat area (SFA) and VFA/SFA ratio (V/S) were measured at L4/L5 level by the radiologist. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the association of VFA, SFA, V/S with the parameters in both U and C groups. RESULTS: 352 patients were included in this study (U:C = 265:87). There was no significant difference in vital signs and biochemistry results in both groups. There was no significant difference in VFA, SFA, V/S ratios in both groups. In patients with V/S ratio > 0.4, they were 5.06 times more likely to undergo emergency intervention (95% CI 1.10-23.45) (p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, a heart rate > 100 (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.2-6.7), CRP > 50 (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.9-6.0), WCC < 4 or > 12 (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.6) and V/S ratio > 0.4 (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5-5.4) were predictive of complicated diverticulitis. CONCLUSION: The quantitative radiological measurement of visceral adiposity is useful in prognostication in patients presenting with diverticulitis.
Subject(s)
Diverticulitis/diagnostic imaging , Diverticulitis/etiology , Intra-Abdominal Fat/diagnostic imaging , Obesity, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Adiposity , Aged , Diverticulitis/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Obesity, Abdominal/complications , Retrospective Studies , Subcutaneous Fat/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There has been a historic similarity in the epidemiology and pathophysiology of diverticular disease and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Because there are limited to no data on the role of diverticulitis as a potential risk factor for de novo IBD, we aimed to evaluate the role of diverticulitis and complicated diverticulitis as a potential predictor of IBD. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center study including patients older than age 18 years who were diagnosed with diverticulitis from January 2012 until December 2018 without a prior diagnosis of IBD. These patients were then evaluated for development of IBD. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to compare the characteristics and outcomes between patients who did or did not develop IBD. RESULTS: A total of 2770 patients were diagnosed with diverticulitis from 2012 until 2018. Of these patients, 17 were diagnosed with IBD, resulting in an incidence rate of 0.23% per patient-year. The incidence rate among patients who required surgery for diverticulitis was 0.44% per patient-year, and patients with complicated diverticulitis had an incidence rate of 0.91% per patient-year. Univariate analysis showed that the need for surgery related to diverticulitis (hazard ratio [HR], 6.27; P = 0.003) and complicated diverticulitis was associated with the development of IBD (HR, 14.71; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that complicated diverticulitis was the sole factor associated with IBD (HR, 10.34; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diverticulitis are at a higher risk of developing de novo IBD. This risk is highest in patients with complicated diverticulitis.