Randomized Trial of Vaccines for Zaire Ebola Virus Disease.

BACKGROUND: Questions remain concerning the rapidity of immune responses and the durability and safety of vaccines used to prevent Zaire Ebola virus disease. METHODS: We conducted two randomized, placebo-controlled trials - one involving adults and one involving children - to evaluate the safety and immune responses of three vaccine regimens against Zaire Ebola virus disease: Ad26.ZEBOV followed by MVA-BN-Filo 56 days later (the Ad26-MVA group), rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP followed by placebo 56 days later (the rVSV group), and rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP followed by rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP 56 days later (the rVSV-booster group). The primary end point was antibody response at 12 months, defined as having both a 12-month antibody concentration of at least 200 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay units (EU) per milliliter and an increase from baseline in the antibody concentration by at least a factor of 4. RESULTS: A total of 1400 adults and 1401 children underwent randomization. Among both adults and children, the incidence of injection-site reactions and symptoms (e.g., feverishness and headache) was higher in the week after receipt of the primary and second or booster vaccinations than after receipt of placebo but not at later time points. These events were largely low-grade. At month 12, a total of 41% of adults (titer, 401 EU per milliliter) and 78% of children (titer, 828 EU per milliliter) had a response in the Ad26-MVA group; 76% (titer, 992 EU per milliliter) and 87% (titer, 1415 EU per milliliter), respectively, had a response in the rVSV group; 81% (titer, 1037 EU per milliliter) and 93% (titer, 1745 EU per milliliter), respectively, had a response in the rVSV-booster group; and 3% (titer, 93 EU per milliliter) and 4% (titer, 67 EU per milliliter), respectively, had a response in the placebo group (P<0.001 for all comparisons of vaccine with placebo). In both adults and children, antibody responses with vaccine differed from those with placebo beginning on day 14. CONCLUSIONS: No safety concerns were identified in this trial. With all three vaccine regimens, immune responses were seen from day 14 through month 12. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; PREVAC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02876328; EudraCT numbers, 2017-001798-18 and 2017-001798-18/3rd; and Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number, PACTR201712002760250.).

Ebola virus – from neglected threat to global emergency state / Vírus ébola – de ameaça negligenciada ao estado de emergência global

SUMMARY Objective: This review aims to update knowledge about Ebola virus disease (EVD) and recent advances in its diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Method: A literature review was performed using the following databases: ISI Web of Knowledge, PubMed, IRIS, Scopus and the websites of the CDC and the WHO. Additionally, we have included articles and reports referenced in the basic literature search, and news that were considered relevant. Results: The Ebola virus, endemic in some parts of Africa, is responsible for a severe form of hemorrhagic fever in humans; bats are probably its natural reservoir. It is an extremely virulent virus and easily transmitted by bodily fluids. EVD's complex pathophysiology, characterized by immunosuppression as well as stimulation of an intense inflammatory response, results in a syndrome similar to septic shock. The diagnosis is difficult due to the initial symptoms that mimic other diseases. Despite the high mortality rates that can amount to 90%, a prophylaxis (chemical or vaccine) or effective treatment does not exist. Two vaccines and experimental therapies are being developed for the prevention and treatment of EVD. Conclusion: Although the virus is known for about 40 years, the lack of knowledge obtained and the disinterest of government authorities in the countries involved justify the state of emergency currently exists regarding this infectious agent. Only the coordination of multiple entities and the effective commitment of the international community will facilitate the control and effective prevention of EVD.

RESUMO Objetivo: esta revisão tem como objetivo atualizar os conhecimentos sobre a doença do vírus ébola (DVE) e sobre os recentes avanços nos métodos de diagnóstico, tratamento e prevenção. Método: foi realizada uma revisão de literatura, utilizando as seguintes bases de dados: ISI Web of Knowledge, PubMed, IRIS, Scopus e os sites do Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) e da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Adicionalmente, foram incluídos artigos e relatórios referenciados na pesquisa bibliográfica de base e notícias consideradas relevantes. Resultados: o vírus ébola, endêmico de algumas regiões da África, é responsável por uma forma grave de febre hemorrágica no homem, e os morcegos são provavelmente o seu reservatório natural. É um vírus extremamente virulento e de fácil transmissão pelos fluidos corporais. A complexa fisiopatologia da doença, caracterizada pela imunossupressão e pelo estímulo a uma intensa resposta inflamatória, resulta em uma síndrome semelhante ao choque séptico. O seu diagnóstico é difícil, por causa da sintomatologia inicial, que mimetiza outras doenças. Apesar das altas taxas de mortalidade, que podem alcançar os 90%, não existe profilaxia (química ou vacinal) ou tratamento eficaz. Encontram-se em desenvolvimento duas vacinas e terapias experimentais para a prevenção e o tratamento da DVE. Conclusão: apesar de ser um vírus conhecido há cerca de 40 anos, o escasso conhecimento obtido e o desinteresse das entidades governamentais de países envolvidos justificam o estado de emergência que se vive atualmente em relação a esse agente infeccioso. A coordenação por múltiplas entidades e o empenho efetivo da comunidade internacional facilitarão o seu controle e a prevenção eficaz.

Ebola virus - from neglected threat to global emergency state.

OBJECTIVE: This review aims to update knowledge about Ebola virus disease (EVD) and recent advances in its diagnosis, treatment and prevention. METHOD: A literature review was performed using the following databases: ISI Web of Knowledge, PubMed, IRIS, Scopus and the websites of the CDC and the WHO. Additionally, we have included articles and reports referenced in the basic literature search, and news that were considered relevant. RESULTS: The Ebola virus, endemic in some parts of Africa, is responsible for a severe form of hemorrhagic fever in humans; bats are probably its natural reservoir. It is an extremely virulent virus and easily transmitted by bodily fluids. EVD's complex pathophysiology, characterized by immunosuppression as well as stimulation of an intense inflammatory response, results in a syndrome similar to septic shock. The diagnosis is difficult due to the initial symptoms that mimic other diseases. Despite the high mortality rates that can amount to 90%, a prophylaxis (chemical or vaccine) or effective treatment does not exist. Two vaccines and experimental therapies are being developed for the prevention and treatment of EVD. CONCLUSION: Although the virus is known for about 40 years, the lack of knowledge obtained and the disinterest of government authorities in the countries involved justify the state of emergency currently exists regarding this infectious agent. Only the coordination of multiple entities and the effective commitment of the international community will facilitate the control and effective prevention of EVD.