Multipolar Electrograms: A New Configuration That Increases the Measurement Accuracy of Intracardiac Signals.

BACKGROUND: Accurate measurements of intracardiac electrograms (EGMs) remain a clinical challenge because of the suboptimal attenuation of far-field potentials. Multielectrode mapping catheters provide an opportunity to construct multipolar instead of bipolar EGMs for rejecting common far-field potentials recorded from a multivectorial space. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to develop a multipolar EGM and compare its characteristics to those of bipolar EGMs METHODS: Using a 36-electrode array catheter (Optrell-36, Biosense Webster), a far-field component was mathematically constructed from clusters of electrodes surrounding each inspected electrode. This component was subtracted from the unipolar waveform to produce a local unipolar, referred to as a "multipolar EGM." The performance of multipolar EGMs was evaluated in 7 swine with healed anteroseptal infarction. RESULTS: Multipolar EGMs proved superior in attenuating far-field potentials in infarct border zones, increasing the near-field to far-field ratio from 0.92 ± 0.2 to 2.25 ± 0.3 (P < 0.001). Removal of far-field components reduced the voltage amplitude (P < 0.001) and enlarged the infarct surface area (P = 0.02), aligning more closely with histological findings. Of 379 EGMs with ≥20 ms activation time difference between bipolar and multipolar EGMs, 95.3% (361 of 379) were accurately annotated using multipolar EGMs, while annotation based on bipolar EGM was predominantly made on far-field components. CONCLUSIONS: Multielectrode array catheters provide a unique platform for constructing multipolar EGMs. This new EGM may be beneficial for "purifying" local potentials within a complex electrical field, resulting in more accurate voltage and activation maps.

Use of three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping for epicardial access: needle tracking, electrographic characteristics, and clinical application.

AIMS: Pericardiocentesis is usually completed under fluoroscopy. The electroanatomic mapping (EAM) system allows visualizing puncture needle tip (NT) while displaying the electrogram recorded from NT, making it possible to obtain epicardial access (EA) independent of fluoroscopy. This study was designed to establish and validate a technique by which EA is obtained under guidance of three-dimensional (3D) EAM combined with NT electrogram. METHODS AND RESULTS: 3D shell of the heart was generated, and the NT was made trackable in the EAM system. Unipolar NT electrogram was continuously monitored. Penetration into pericardial sac was determined by an increase in NT potential amplitude and an injury current. A long guidewire of which the tip was also visible in the EAM system was advanced to confirm EA. Epicardial access was successfully obtained without complication in 13 pigs and 22 patients. In the animals, NT potential amplitude was 3.2 ± 1.0 mV when it was located in mediastinum, 5.2 ± 1.6 mV when in contact with fibrous pericardium, and 9.8 ± 2.8 mV after penetrating into pericardial sac (all P ≤ 0.001). In human subjects, it measured 1.54 ± 0.40 mV, 3.61 ± 1.08 mV, and 7.15 ± 2.88 mV, respectively (all P < 0.001). Fluoroscopy time decreased in every 4-5 cases (64 ± 15, 23 ± 17, and 0 s for animals 1-4, 5-8, 9-13, respectively, P = 0.01; 44 ± 23, 31 ± 18, 4±7 s for patients 1-7, 8-14, 15-22, respectively, P < 0.001). In five pigs and seven patients, EA was obtained without X-ray exposure. CONCLUSION: By tracking NT in the 3D EAM system and continuously monitoring the NT electrogram, it is feasible and safe to obtain EA with minimum or no fluoroscopic guidance.

Multisize Electrode Field-of-View: Validation by High Resolution Gadolinium-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.

BACKGROUND: Voltage mapping to detect ventricular scar is important for guiding catheter ablation, but the field-of-view of unipolar, bipolar, conventional, and microelectrodes as it relates to the extent of viable myocardium (VM) is not well defined. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate electroanatomic voltage-mapping (EAVM) with different-size electrodes for identifying VM, validated against high-resolution ex-vivo cardiac magnetic resonance (HR-LGE-CMR). METHODS: A total of 9 swine with early-reperfusion myocardial infarction were mapped with the QDOT microcatheter. HR-LGE-CMR (0.3-mm slices) were merged with EAVM. At each EAVM point, the underlying VM in multisize transmural cylinders and spheres was quantified from ex vivo CMR and related to unipolar and bipolar voltages recorded from conventional and microelectrodes. RESULTS: In each swine, 220 mapping points (Q1, Q3: 216, 260 mapping points) were collected. Infarcts were heterogeneous and nontransmural. Unipolar and bipolar voltage increased with VM volumes from >175 mm3 up to >525 mm3 (equivalent to a 5-mm radius cylinder with height >6.69 mm). VM volumes in subendocardial cylinders with 1- or 3-mm depth correlated poorly with all voltages. Unipolar voltages recorded with conventional and microelectrodes were similar (difference 0.17 ± 2.66 mV) and correlated best to VM within a sphere of radius 10 and 8 mm, respectively. Distance-weighting did not improve the correlation. CONCLUSIONS: Voltage increases with transmural volume of VM but correlates poorly with small amounts of VM, which limits EAVM in defining heterogeneous scar. Microelectrodes cannot distinguish thin from thick areas of subendocardial VM. The field-of-view for unipolar recordings for microelectrodes and conventional electrodes appears to be 8 to 10 mm, respectively, and unexpectedly similar.

Diagnóstico diferencial entre doble respuesta ventricular y extrasistolia hisiana bigeminada. Respuesta / Differential diagnosis between dual ventricular response and bigeminy arising from the bundle of his. Response

No disponible

Polar S810 como recurso alternativo ao eletrocardiograma no teste de exercício de 4 segundos / Polar S810 as an alternative resource to the use of the electrocardiogram in the 4-second exercise test

FUNDAMENTO: O teste de exercício de 4 segundos (T4s) avalia o tônus vagal cardíaco durante o transiente inicial da frequência cardíaca (FC), em exercício dinâmico súbito, por meio da identificação do índice vagal cardíaco (IVC) obtido a partir do eletrocardiograma (ECG). OBJETIVO: Testar a utilização do monitor de frequência cardíaca (MFC) Polar S810 como recurso alternativo ao ECG na aplicação do T4s. MÉTODOS: Neste trabalho, 49 indivíduos do sexo masculino (25 ± 20 anos, 176 ± 12 cm, 74 ± 6 kg) realizaram o T4s. Os intervalos RR foram registrados simultaneamente por ECG e MFC. Calcularam-se média e desvio padrão do último intervalo RR do período pré-exercício ou o primeiro do período de exercício, aquele que for mais longo (RRB), do mais curto intervalo RR do período de exercício (RRC) e do IVC obtidos por ECG e MFC. Utilizou-se o teste t de Student para amostras dependentes (p < 0,05) para testar a significância das diferenças entre as médias. Para identificar a concordância entre o ECG e o MFC, utilizou-se a regressão linear, com cálculo do coeficiente de correlação de Pearson e a estratégia proposta por Bland e Altman. RESULTADOS: A regressão linear apresentou r² de 0,9999 para o RRB, 0,9997 para o RRC e 0,9996 para o IVC. A estratégia de Bland e Altman apresentou desvio padrão de 0,92 ms para o RRB, 0,86 ms para o RRC e 0,002 para o IVC. CONCLUSÃO: O MFC Polar S810 se mostrou eficiente na aplicação do T4s quando comparado ao ECG.

BACKGROUND: The 4-second exercise test (T4s) evaluates the cardiac vagal tone during the initial heart rate (HR) transient at sudden dynamic exercise, through the identification of the cardiac vagal index (CVI) obtained from the electrocardiogram (ECG). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of the Polar S810 heart rate monitor (HRM) as an alternative resource to the use of the electrocardiogram in the 4-second exercise test. METHODS: In this study, 49 male individuals (25 ± 20 years, 176 ±12 cm, 74 ± 6 kg) underwent the 4-second exercise test. The RR intervals were recorded simultaneously by ECG and HRM. We calculated the mean and the standard deviation of the last RR interval of the pre-exercise period, or of the first RR interval of the exercise period, whichever was longer (RRB), of the shortest RR interval of the exercise period (RRC), and of the CVI obtained by ECG and HRM. We used the Student t-test for dependent samples (p < 0.05) to test the significance of the differences between means. To identify the correlation between the ECG and the HRM, we used the linear regression to calculate the Pearson's correlation coefficient and the strategy proposed by Bland and Altman. RESULTS: Linear regression showed r² of 0.9999 for RRB, 0.9997 for RRC, and 0.9996 for CVI. Bland e Altman strategy presented standard deviation of 0.92 ms for RRB, 0.86 ms for RRC, and 0.002 for CVI. CONCLUSION: Polar S810 HRM was more efficient in the application of T4s compared to the ECG.