ABSTRACT
Crisis facilities provide a safe and therapeutic alternative to emergency departments and jails for people experiencing behavioral health emergencies. Program design should center around customer needs which include individuals and families in crisis and key community stakeholders like first responders. Ideally, a crisis system should be organized into a broad continuum of services that ensures care is provided in the least restrictive setting, even for people with high acuity needs, and stakeholders should have a clear understanding of the capabilities of each component facility and the population it can safely serve. This paper provides a framework to help policymakers achieve this goal.
Subject(s)
Crisis Intervention , Humans , Crisis Intervention/methods , Mental Disorders/therapy , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/methods , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/organization & administrationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Psychiatric emergency assessment of minors can be a complex process, especially for professional staff who are not specifically trained in handling child and adolescent emergency patients. As minors cannot usually express their feelings and experiences as well as adults, it is difficult to form an accurate picture of their condition and to determine what kind of emergency care is needed, for instance whether or not a psychiatric emergency admission is necessary. We lack insight in what professionals at emergency departments need to adequately assess these minors and their families. The aim of this study was to explore staff members' experiences with assessing minors and explore recommendations for improving their ability to provide appropriate support. METHODS: Guided by a topic list with open-ended questions, we conducted 11 semi-structured interviews with staff working at psychiatric emergency services. Thematic analysis enabled us to identify five main themes: (1) young age and the crucial role of parents; (2) professionals' feelings, especially uncertainty; (3) psychiatric emergency admissions and the alternatives to them; (4) regional differences in organization and tasks; and (5) options for improving care. RESULTS: The staff interviewed all agreed that it was often complicated and time consuming to take full responsibility when assessing minors with serious and urgent psychiatric problems. Most found it difficult to determine which behaviors were and were not age-appropriate, and how to handle systemic problems during the assessment. When assessing minors and their families in crisis, this led to uncertainty. Professionals were especially insecure when assessing children under age 12 and their families, feeling they lacked the appropriate knowledge and routine. CONCLUSION: Customized expertise development and improved regional embedding of the psychiatric emergency service in the child and adolescent services will reduce professionals' uncertainty and improve psychiatric emergency care for minors.
Subject(s)
Emergency Services, Psychiatric , Qualitative Research , Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Child , Attitude of Health Personnel , Minors/psychology , Referral and Consultation , Adult , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/psychology , Parents/psychology , Health Personnel/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The demand for urgent psychiatric care is increasing, but in Spain there are no clear recommendations for emergency departments (ED) on how to optimize care for patients with psychiatric emergencies. We aimed to provide expert consensus recommendations on the requirements for general hospitals´ emergency departments to treat patients with urgent psychiatric symptoms. METHODS: We used a modified Delphi technique. A scientific committee compiled 36 statements based on literature search and clinical experience. The statements covered the organizational model, facilities, staffing, safety, patient interventions, and staff training. A panel of 38 psychiatry specialists with expertise in psychiatric emergencies evaluated the questionnaire in two rounds. RESULTS: After two rounds of voting, 30 out of 36 proposed items (83%) were agreed upon. The panel agreed that psychiatric emergencies should be managed in a general hospital, with dedicated facilities for patient assessment, direct supervision of patients at risk, and an observation unit run by the psychiatric service. In addition to the psychiatrist, the ED should have specialist nurses and security staff available 24/7. Social workers should also be readily available. ED and consulting rooms should be designed to ensure patient and staff safety. A triage system should be established for patients with psychiatric symptoms, with medical evaluation preceding psychiatric evaluation. Guidance on supplies, equipment, and staff training is also provided. CONCLUSION: All ED in general hospitals should have adequate resources to handle any psychiatric emergency. This paper provides recommendations on the minimum requirements to achieve this goal.
Subject(s)
Consensus , Delphi Technique , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Spain , Emergency Service, Hospital/standards , Mental Disorders/therapy , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/standards , Hospitals, General/standards , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Telepsychiatry (TP), a live video meeting, has been implemented in many contexts and settings. It has a distinct advantage in the psychiatric emergency department (ED) setting, as it expedites expert assessments for psychiatric patients. However, limited knowledge exits for TP's effectiveness in the ED setting, as well as the process of implementing TP in this setting. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aimed to review the existing evidence for the administrative and clinical outcomes for TP in the ED setting and to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementing TP in this setting. METHODS: The scoping review was conducted according to the guidelines for the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). Three electronic databases were examined: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The databases were searched from January 2013 to April 2023 for papers and their bibliography. A total of 2816 potentially relevant papers were retrieved from the initial search. Studies were screened and selected independently by 2 authors. RESULTS: A total of 11 articles were included. Ten papers reported on administrative and clinical outcomes of TP use in the ED setting and 1 on the barriers and facilitators of its implementation. TP is used in urban and rural areas and for settings with and with no on-site psychiatric services. Evidence shows that TP reduced waiting time for psychiatric evaluation, but in some studies, it was associated with prolonged total length of stay in the ED compared with in-person evaluation. Findings indicate lower admission rates in patients assessed with TP in the ED. Limited data were reported for TP costs, its use for involuntary commitment evaluations, and its use for particular subgroups of patients (eg, those with a particular diagnosis). A single paper examined TP implementation process in the ED, which explored the barriers and facilitators for implementation among patients and staff in a rural setting. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the extant studies, TP seems to be generally feasible and acceptable to key stakeholders. However, this review detected a gap in the literature regarding TP's effectiveness and implementation process in the ED setting. Specific attention should be paid to the examination of this service for specific groups of patients, as well as its use to enable assessments for possible involuntary commitment.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Telemedicine , Humans , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/methods , Mental Disorders/therapy , Psychiatry/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adjustment and stress-related disorders are prevalent among psychiatric service users. Despite their prevalence, little is known about their prognosis. To reduce that gap, the present article documents the service use and diagnostic outcomes of people with adjustment or stress-related disorders presenting at Singapore's largest psychiatric emergency department. METHODS: Administrative data from 2014 to 2021 was retrieved to follow a group of 683 service users whose first-ever psychiatric presentation in 2014 warranted a diagnosis of adjustment or stress-related disorder. People were grouped a priori depending on whether different diagnoses were recorded within 7 days, 9 months, after 9 months or not at all. Survival curves characterized conversion to other diagnoses and engagement with healthcare services. Service use outcomes include the number of hospitalizations, outpatient appointments, emergency department visits, and prescriptions. RESULTS: Sixty-one percent (n = 417) never received another diagnosis over the 8-year period. This group used emergency services most and received the most pharmacotherapy shortly after their first visit. Of those who received another diagnosis, depression, personality disorders, and psychotic disorders were the most common. Those who received another diagnosis within 7 days (n = 70, 10%) received it on their first day of hospitalization (IQR 1-1), making the most use of inpatient services. The group who received another diagnosis within 9 months (n = 105, 15%) did so after 42 days (IQR 26-84) and had the highest relative number of deaths. Those who received another diagnosis after 9 months (n = 91, 13%) did so after 1,134 days (IQR 613-1,823) and had the longest period of engagement but made the least use of any psychiatric service, potentially suggesting a group whose early index diagnosis heralded vulnerability to future disorders. CONCLUSIONS: A large group of service users with acute stress or adjustment disorders will likely never be given another psychiatric diagnosis and appear to disengage following an initial period of high-intensity service use. The group that received a different diagnosis after the 9-month mark had prolonged contact with services but low intensity of service use and may represent a target for preventative intervention to help them improve their stress-managing skills and avoid developing other disorders.
Subject(s)
Adjustment Disorders , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Adjustment Disorders/epidemiology , Adjustment Disorders/diagnosis , Adjustment Disorders/psychology , Singapore/epidemiology , Longitudinal Studies , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Literature on psychiatric emergency services (PES) presentations during the COVID-19 pandemic showed heterogeneous results regarding patients brought in by police (BIBP). This is the first study primarily focusing on patients BIBP in a PES during the COVID-19-period. METHODS: Case documentation records during the first and second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in a PES in Berlin, Germany were analyzed using descriptive data analysis and binomial logistic regression analysis to detect factors that predict presentations BIBP. RESULTS: 5440 PES presentations: 20.4% BIBP during the first wave vs. 16.3% during its control period; second wave: 17.6% BIBP vs. 14.9% during its control period. In both waves, absolute increases in presentations BIBP were seen compared to control (p = .029, p = .028, respectively). COVID-19-period was a predictor for presentations BIBP during the first and the second wave. The following factors also predicted presentations BIBP: younger age, male gender, aggressive behavior, suicide attempt prior to presentation and diagnosis of psychotic or substance use disorders; depressive disorders were negatively associated. CONCLUSIONS: During the two first waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increase in presentations BIBP in a PES in Berlin. Regression analysis shows that the pandemic itself was a predictor of presentations BIBP. The underlying factors of this association need to be further elucidated in future research. Additionally, general factors predicting PES presentations BIBP are reported that replenish the present literature.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Emergency Services, Psychiatric , Mental Disorders , Police , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Male , Female , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Police/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Berlin/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Germany/epidemiology , Young Adult , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data , AgedABSTRACT
In October 2023, Israel sustained a massive terror attack, with 1,300 people murdered, over 240 kidnapped, and millions exposed to the horrors. This study's aim is to examine the profile of patients arriving to the emergency department (ED) for psychiatric services during the month following the attack, compared to a similar period the year prior. In this cohort study, we compared patients arriving to the ED of a large general hospital in the center of Tel Aviv for psychiatric services during the month post-attack with the previous year using t-tests and chi-square exams. In 2023, 256 patients arrived in the ED for psychiatric evaluation and/or treatment, 46 % more than in 2022. Of these, 64 % were examined due to symptoms related to the terror attack. In 2023, significantly fewer patients had a prior psychiatric diagnosis (68% vs. 89 %). Significantly more patients were diagnosed with acute stress reaction or acute stress disorder in the ED, compared to almost no such diagnoses in 2022 (14 % and 43% vs. 0 % and 1 %). Major terror incidents profoundly influence psychiatric ED visits. Planning efforts for major emergencies should be adapted accordingly.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Terrorism , Humans , Israel/epidemiology , Terrorism/statistics & numerical data , Terrorism/psychology , Male , Female , Adult , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Cohort Studies , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Adolescent , Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute/epidemiology , Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Methamphetamine frequently causes substance-induced psychosis and related symptoms. There are currently no interventions to prevent or assist in self-management of these symptoms. METHODS: We evaluated a program providing "Methamphetamine Assist Packs" to patients who were seen in a psychiatric emergency services program for methamphetamine-induced psychosis. Methamphetamine Assist Packs included a small number of tablets of an antipsychotic medication (olanzapine), administration instructions, and referral information. We reviewed medical charts of patients who received Methamphetamine Assist Packs from January 2022 through May 2023 for sociodemographic and emergency visit characteristics. We assessed the changes between the number of psychiatric emergency visits before and after Methamphetamine Assist Pack receipt at two, six, and 12 months using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients received a Methamphetamine Assist Pack, with a mean age of 40 years; 79 % were male and 49 % Black/African American; 77 % experienced housing instability or homelessness. The most common symptoms were suicidal ideation (54 %), paranoia or delusions (45 %), and hallucinations (40 %); 55 % were on involuntary psychiatric hold, 38 % required medications for agitation, and 18 % required seclusion or physical restraints. The rate of psychiatric emergency visits after Methamphetamine Assist Pack receipt was 0.68 and 0.87 times the rate prior to receipt at two and six months, respectively (p < 0.001). There was no difference at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Methamphetamine Assist Packs were associated with fewer psychiatric emergency visits for six months after receipt, and represent a promising intervention to address acute psychiatric toxicity from methamphetamine in need of further research.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Methamphetamine , Self-Management , Humans , Methamphetamine/adverse effects , Methamphetamine/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Psychoses, Substance-Induced/etiology , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Amphetamine-Related Disorders/therapy , Central Nervous System Stimulants/administration & dosage , Central Nervous System Stimulants/adverse effectsABSTRACT
The psychomotrician is a healthcare professional trained in mind-body approaches. They take into account sensoriality, motor skills, cognition, psyche and emotions in relation to the individual's environment and the expression of disorders. It is an integral part of the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. For some years now, psychomotricians have been part of volunteer teams in medical-psychological emergency units, where they offer an integrative approach. Using the body and mediation as their working tools, they rely on non-verbal communication and body language to bring the patient back to the present moment within a reassuring framework.
Subject(s)
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/nursing , Emergency Service, Hospital , Nonverbal Communication/psychology , Mind-Body Relations, Metaphysical , Emergency Services, Psychiatric , Psychiatric Nursing , Interdisciplinary Communication , France , Kinesics , Intersectoral CollaborationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Boarding of adolescent patients with mental health concerns requiring ongoing observation and treatment is of increasing concern across US emergency departments. The objective was a proof of concept of developing an adolescent psychiatric emergency unit and assessment of the impact of this unit on lengths of stay (LOS). METHODS: We describe the creation of the unit designed to allow safe assessment and boarding of patients, and appropriate interventions and services, while arranging transfer to inpatient facility or safe discharge home. Using a precreation and postcreation analysis and comparison with a similar facility that did not create such a unit, we utilized linear regression to investigate the primary outcome of total length of stay and secondary outcomes of psychiatric emergency department and pediatric emergency department length of stay for both unit-eligible patients and all patients. RESULTS: The overall length of stay was not associated with a statistically significant change for unit-eligible patients; however, there was a significant decrease in the pediatric emergency department LOS for unit-eligible patients. This was associated with a decrease in beds lost to boarding in the pediatric emergency department of 544 hours per month. CONCLUSIONS: Creation of an adolescent psychiatric emergency unit without allotment of significant additional resources is an option to decrease pediatric emergency department boarding times for adolescent patients requiring ongoing emergent therapy for mental health concerns.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospitals, Urban , Length of Stay , Humans , Adolescent , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Mental Disorders/therapy , Emergency Services, PsychiatricABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy is one of the most prevalent chronic neurological diseases, presenting a high frequency of psychiatric disorders (PD). This study sought to evaluate the clinical and sociodemographic profile of patients with epilepsy (PWE) attended at a regional reference psychiatric emergency unit. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional, and descriptive observational study was conducted utilizing a patient record database of individuals with epilepsy who were attended in a regional reference psychiatric emergency unit between January 2018 and August 2022. RESULTS: Out of the 31,800 psychiatric emergency visits, 260 (0.8â¯%) were of patients with epilepsy (ICD-10: G40). The majority were males (63.5â¯%) with a mean age of 42.11±15.39 years, single marital status (154; 59.25â¯%) and elementary education (75; 28.9â¯%). Most of them (203; 78.1â¯%) presented at least one psychiatric comorbidity at the emergency visit, but 109 (41.9â¯%) were not receiving any psychiatric follow-up. A total of 106 patients (40.8â¯%) had experienced at least one past psychiatric hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of PD is highly prevalent in PWE, and probably with a high frequency of psychiatric emergencies occurring among them. Further studies are needed to assess such patient profile, particularly involving data from psychiatric emergency units.
Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Mental Disorders , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , PrevalenceABSTRACT
There has been a lack of short and simple screening instruments to assess the risk of violence in youth. Many acute youth departments have used the V-RISK-10, a risk screener for adults. V-RISK-Y is a risk screener based on the V-RISK-10 and adapted to youths. Our aim was to compare the predictive validity between V-RISK-Y and VRISK-10 in an emergency psychiatric adolescent ward. Target population were all 92 patients admitted within one year, and study population consisted of 49 (53 %) patients who had completed data. V-RISK-10 and V-RISK-Y were scored at admission and compared with recorded episodes of violence during the hospitalization. V-RISK-Y showed higher AUC values for recorded violence and some of the individual items also showed better results. Most differences were not significant, but results may still be of clinical interest.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Emergency Services, Psychiatric , Violence , Humans , Adolescent , Male , Female , Violence/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Psychiatric Status Rating ScalesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate variations in intended utilization in cases of an acute psychotic episode, an alcohol related or depressive disorder depending on different case characteristics. METHODS: A telephone survey with case vignettes was conducted (N=1,200). Vignettes varied in terms of urgency of symptoms, daytime, sex of the afflicted person and age/mental disorder. The respondents were asked to indicate whom they would contact first in the described case. RESULTS: Outpatient physicians were named most frequently as the first point of contact (61.1%) while only 6.5% of the respondents named emergency medicine including the medical on call service (8.1% in high urgency cases, i. e. emergencies that did not tolerate any delay). Intended utilization varied by urgency and age/mental illness. CONCLUSION: More Information about the need to seek medical help immediately in cases of mental illnesses with high urgency should be provided.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Germany , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Alcoholism/psychology , Alcoholism/therapy , Utilization Review/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Young Adult , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Crisis services are undergoing an unprecedented expansion in the United States, but research is lacking on crisis system design. This study describes how individuals flow through a well-established crisis system and examines factors associated with reutilization of such services. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used Medicaid claims to construct episodes describing the flow of individuals through mobile crisis, specialized crisis facility, emergency department, and inpatient services. Claims data were merged with electronic health record (EHR) data for the subset of individuals receiving care at a crisis response center. A generalized estimating equation was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios for demographic, clinical, and operational factors associated with reutilization of services within 30 days of an episode's end point. RESULTS: Of 41,026 episodes, most (57.4%) began with mobile crisis services or a specialized crisis facility rather than the emergency department. Of the subset (N=9,202 episodes) with merged EHR data, most episodes (63.3%) were not followed by reutilization. Factors associated with increased odds of 30-day reutilization included Black race, homelessness, stimulant use, psychosis, and episodes beginning with mobile crisis services or ending with inpatient care. Decreased odds were associated with depression, trauma, and involuntary legal status. Most (59.3%) episodes beginning with an involuntary legal status ended with a voluntary status. CONCLUSIONS: Crisis systems can serve a large proportion of individuals experiencing psychiatric emergencies and divert them from more restrictive and costly levels of care. Understanding demographic, clinical, and operational factors associated with 30-day reutilization may aid in the design and implementation of crisis systems.
Subject(s)
Crisis Intervention , Medicaid , Humans , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , United States , Adult , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Crisis Intervention/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Mental Disorders/therapy , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Mobile Health Units/statistics & numerical dataSubject(s)
Emergency Services, Psychiatric , Humans , Quebec/epidemiology , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Incidence , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Adult , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Legislation, Drug , CannabisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients placed in seclusion for behavioral dyscontrol often perceive that the health care team is treating them inappropriately. These patients may express their indignation in many ways. To better characterize these behaviors, we conducted a study of protest behaviors in a psychiatric emergency service. METHODS: Video surveillance of seclusion room occupants is routinely reviewed as part of our safety protocol. For 1 month in 2022, we noted the frequency and timing of potential protest behaviors such as disrobing and evacuation. Descriptive statistics were applied. RESULTS: A total of 41 seclusion events (8.1%) occurred over the surveillance period, which included 504 initial emergency psychiatric evaluations. Six patients (14.6%) engaged in protest behaviors (all within 5 minutes of being placed in seclusion), including 3 (7.3%) who urinated and 3 (7.3%) who disrobed. One patient urinated almost immediately (2.4%), and another urinated 25 minutes after entering seclusion; the latter was not interpreted as a protest behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate behaviors in seclusion that are different from behaviors that led to seclusion can be interpreted as protest behaviors. The 2 most often observed protest behaviors were urination and disrobing.
Subject(s)
Emergency Services, Psychiatric , Mental Disorders , Humans , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/psychology , Patient Isolation , Patients , Hospitals, PsychiatricABSTRACT
As emergências psiquiátricas são distúrbios agudos do pensamento, comportamento, humor ou relações sociais, necessitando de uma intervenção imediata. Além disso, ressalta-se que o diagnóstico psiquiátrico de maneira geral difere dos demais por exigir além de habilidades técnico-científicas ou de anamnese uma prática interpessoal e conhecimento do contexto pessoal do paciente.Objetivo:O presente estudotem como objetivo avaliar o nível de conhecimento dosacadêmicos de medicina de uma universidade públicaacerca das emergênciaspsiquiátricas. Metodologia:Trata-se de um estudo observacional, descritivo, do tipo transversal, realizado com 293estudantes de medicina.Foi aplicado um questionário validado, via Google Forms. Foi utilizado o teste qui-quadrado para avaliar as correlações.Resultados:observou-se que há uma associação entre período do curso e conhecimento acerca de emergências psiquiátricas, viu-se que quanto maior o período maior o nível de conhecimento. Ademais, notou-se escassez de cenários de prática para os acadêmicos.Conclusões:Conclui-se que existem lacunas na abordagem da educação médica sobre o tema em questãoe faz-se necessário uma discussão aprofundada para melhoria nesse quesito (AU).
Psychiatric emergenciesare acute disorders of thinking, behavior, mood or social relationships, requiring immediate intervention. In addition, there is an emphasys thatpsychiatric diagnosis in general differs from the others because it requires, in addition to technical-scientific skills or anamnesis, interpersonal practice and knowledge of the patient's personal context.Objective:This study aims to assess the level of knowledge of medical students at a public university regarding psychiatric emergencies. Methodology:This isan observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study, carried out with 293 medical students. A validated questionnaire applied via Google Forms. The chi-square test was used to assess correlations. Results:The study observed that there is an association between the period of the course and knowledge about psychiatric emergencies, that higher the period, greater the level of knowledge. Furthermore, there was a shortage of practice scenarios for academics. Conclusions:It is concluded that there are gaps inthe approach of medical education on the subject in question and an in-depth discussion is necessary to improve this aspect (AU).
Las urgencias psiquiátricasson trastornos agudos del pensamiento, la conducta, el estado de ánimo o las relaciones sociales, que requieren una intervención inmediata. Además, se destaca que el diagnóstico psiquiátrico en general se diferencia de los demás porque requiere, además de habilidades técnico-científicas o anamnesis, práctica interpersonal y conocimiento delcontexto personal del paciente. Objetivo: Este estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar el nivel de conocimiento de los estudiantes de medicina de una universidad pública sobre emergencias psiquiátricas. Metodología: Se trata de un estudio observacional, descriptivo, transversal, realizado con 293 estudiantes de medicina. Se aplicó un cuestionario validado através de Google Forms. Se utilizó la prueba de chi-cuadradopara evaluar las correlaciones. Resultados: Se observó que existe asociación entre el período de la carrera y el conocimiento sobre urgencias psiquiátricas, cuanto mayor era el período, mayor era el nivel de conocimiento. Además, había escasez de escenarios de prácticapara los académicos.Conclusiones: Se concluye que existen lagunas en el abordaje de la educación médica sobre el tema en cuestión y es necesaria una discusión profunda para mejorar en este sentido (AU).