Successful treatment of iatrogenic internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysm following carotid endarterectomy with thrombin injection: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms arising from the internal carotid artery subsequent to carotid endarterectomy are exceptionally infrequent. Herein, we present a case detailing an internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysm that manifested subsequent to a hybrid carotid endarterectomy and endovascular therapy intervention. Our approach to managing this condition involved a novel technique wherein thrombin was directly injected into the luminal cavity of the pseudoaneurysm under the guidance of a C-arm. CASE PRESENTATION: A 66-year-old male patient of Chinese ethnicity exhibited a 4-month history of headache and a 20-day history of gait disturbance. Digital subtraction angiography revealed occlusion in the cervical region of the left carotid artery. Following a hybrid surgical procedure, the patient reported mild pain and bruising surrounding the incision site of the left internal carotid artery endarterectomy. Subsequent angiography identified the presence of a carotid artery pseudoaneurysm. Utilizing C-arm guidance, thrombin was then directly injected into the luminal cavity of the pseudoaneurysm, resulting in complete healing during follow-up. CONCLUSION: For the management of pseudoaneurysms arising post carotid endarterectomy, the direct injection of thrombin into the aneurysm cavity under the guidance of a C-arm is deemed both safe and efficacious.

Comparative on the effectiveness and safety of different carotid endarterectomy techniques: a single-center Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a surgical procedure that can reduce the risk of stroke in patients with carotid artery stenosis. However, controversy still exists regarding the optimal surgical technique for CEA. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and effectiveness of different techniques. METHODS: Data on baseline characteristics as well as perioperative and postoperative complications from patients who underwent CEA at the Department of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, were retrospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 262 CEA patients included in study, with a total of 265 CEA operations. The mean age of 69.95 ± 7.29 (range, 44-89) years. 65 (24.5%) patients underwent cCEA, 94 (35.5%) underwent pCEA, and 106 (40.0%) underwent eCEA. The use of shunt (1.9%) and the mean operation time were lower in eCEA group (P < 0.05). eCEA was also associated with a lower incidence of postoperative hypotension, whereas pCEA was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative hypertension (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in clinical baseline characteristics, occurrence of perioperative complications, and survival whether restenosis-free, asymptomatic or overall. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that all three surgical methods are equally safe for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis and are effective in preventing stroke.

Increased TMEM166 Level in Patients with Postoperative Stroke after Carotid Endarterectomy.

Postoperative stroke is a challenging and potentially devastating complication after elective carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We previously demonstrated that transmembrane protein 166 (TMEM166) levels were directly related to neuronal damage after cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. In this subsequent clinical study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of TMEM166 in patients suffering from post-CEA strokes. Thirty-five patients undergoing uncomplicated elective CEA and 8 patients who suffered ischemic strokes after CEA were recruited. We evaluated the protein level and expression of TMEM166 in patients diagnosed with postoperative strokes and compared it to those in patients who underwent uncomplicated elective CEA. Blood samples and carotid artery plaques were collected and analyzed. High expressions of TMEM166 were detected by immunofluorescence staining and Western Blot in carotid artery plaques of all patients who underwent CEA. Furthermore, circulating TMEM166 concentrations were statistically higher in post-CEA stroke patients than in patients allocated to the control group. Mean plasma concentrations of inflammatory markers, including interleukin 6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP), were also elevated in patients with postoperative strokes. Therefore, based on these findings, we hypothesize that elevated TMEM166 levels, accompanied by a strong inflammatory response, serve as a useful biomarker for risk assessment of postoperative stroke following CEA.

Stenting for subclavian steal phenomenon to restore cerebral perfusion due to acute carotid occlusion following carotid endarterectomy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative symptomatic carotid artery occlusion after carotid endarterectomy is a rare complication. In this study, we present a case of symptomatic acute carotid artery occlusion that occurred after carotid endarterectomy in a patient with coexistent subclavian artery steal phenomenon, which was successfully treated with subclavian artery stenting. CASE PRESENTATION: A 57-year-old East Asian female presented with stenosis in the left common carotid artery and left subclavian artery along with subclavian steal. The proximal segment of the left anterior cerebral artery was hypoplastic, and the posterior communicating arteries on both sides were well-developed. Left internal carotid artery stenosis progressed during the follow-up examination; therefore, left carotid endarterectomy was performed. On the following day, symptoms of cerebral perfusion deficiency appeared due to occlusion of the left carotid artery. The stenotic origin of the left common carotid artery and the suspected massive thrombus in the left carotid artery posed challenges to carotid revascularization. Therefore, left subclavian artery stenting for the subclavian steal phenomenon was determined to be the best option for restoring cerebral blood flow to the whole brain. Her symptoms improved after the procedure, and the postprocedural workup revealed improved cerebral blood flow. CONCLUSION: Subclavian artery stenting is safe and may be helpful in patients with cerebral perfusion deficiency caused by intractable acute carotid occlusion coexisting with the subclavian steal phenomenon. Revascularization of asymptomatic subclavian artery stenosis is generally not recommended. However, cerebral circulatory insufficiency as a comorbidity may be worth considering.

Significance of atherosclerotic plaque location in recanalizing non-acute long-segment occlusion of the internal carotid artery.

To investigate the significance of atherosclerotic plaque location in hybrid surgery comprising both endovascular recanalization approaches and carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic atherosclerotic non-acute long-segment occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA), 162 patients were enrolled, including 120 (74.1%) patients in the proximal plaque group and 42 (25.9%) in the distal plaque group. Surgical recanalization was performed in all patients, with successful recanalization in 119 (99.2%) patients in the proximal and 39 (92.9%) in the distal plaque group. The total successful recanalization rate was 97.5% (158/162) with a failure rate of 2.5% (4/162). Periprocedural complications occurred in 5 (4.2% or 5/120) patients in the proximal plaque group, including neck infection in two (1.7%), recurrent nerve injury in 1 (0.8%), and laryngeal edema in 2 (1.7%), and 2 (4.8%) in the distal plaque group, including femoral puncture infection in 2 (4.8%). No severe complications occurred in either group. Univariate analysis showed plaque location was a significant (P = 0.018) risk factor for successful recanalization, and multivariate analysis indicated that the plaque location remained a significant independent risk factor for recanalization success (P = 0.017). In follow-up 6-48 months after the recanalization surgery, reocclusion occurred in two (2.8%) patients in the proximal plaque group and 4 (13.3%) in the distal plaque group. In conclusion, although hybrid surgery achieves similar outcomes in patients with ICA occlusion caused by either proximal or distal atherosclerotic plaques, plaque location may be a significant risk factor for successful recanalization of symptomatic non-acute long-segment ICA occlusion.

Association between hospital ownership and patient selection, management, and outcomes after carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting : - Secondary data analysis of the Bavarian statutory quality assurance database.

BACKGROUND: This study analyses the association between hospital ownership and patient selection, treatment, and outcome of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS). METHODS: The analysis is based on the Bavarian subset of the nationwide German statutory quality assurance database. All patients receiving CEA or CAS for carotid artery stenosis between 2014 and 2018 were included. Hospitals were subdivided into four groups: university hospitals, public hospitals, hospitals owned by charitable organizations, and private hospitals. The primary outcome was any stroke or death until discharge from hospital. Research was funded by Germany's Federal Joint Committee Innovation Fund (01VSF19016 ISAR-IQ). RESULTS: In total, 22,446 patients were included. The majority of patients were treated in public hospitals (62%), followed by private hospitals (17%), university hospitals (16%), and hospitals under charitable ownership (6%). Two thirds of patients were male (68%), and the median age was 72 years. CAS was most often applied in university hospitals (25%) and most rarely used in private hospitals (9%). Compared to university hospitals, patients in private hospitals were more likely asymptomatic (65% vs. 49%). In asymptomatic patients, the risk of stroke or death was 1.3% in university hospitals, 1.5% in public hospitals, 1.0% in hospitals of charitable owners, and 1.2% in private hospitals. In symptomatic patients, these figures were 3.0%, 2.5%, 3.4%, and 1.2% respectively. Univariate analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between hospital groups. In the multivariable analysis, compared to university hospitals, the odds ratio of stroke or death in asymptomatic patients treated by CEA was significantly lower in charitable hospitals (OR 0.19 [95%-CI 0.07-0.56, p = 0.002]) and private hospitals (OR 0.47 [95%-CI 0.23-0.98, p = 0.043]). In symptomatic patients (elective treatment, CEA), patients treated in private or public hospitals showed a significantly lower odds ratio compared to university hospitals (0.36 [95%-CI 0.17-0.72, p = 0.004] and 0.65 [95%-CI 0.42-1.00, p = 0.048], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital ownership was related to patient selection and treatment, but not generally to outcomes. The lower risk of stroke or death in the subgroup of electively treated patients in private hospitals might be due to the right timing, the choice of treatment modality or actually to better structural and process quality.

Long-term cognitive and neurovascular changes after carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been associated with both cognitive decline and improvement, but the underlying neurovascular mechanisms are unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between neurovascular indices and cognitive changes after CEA. METHODS: We studied 55 patients with severe (≥70%) symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis before and six months after CEA. A wide array of neuropsychological tests was arranged in eight cognitive domains and cognitive functions specific to hemisphere ipsilateral to operation. Differences in cognitive performance between patients and 38 matching healthy controls were studied with linear mixed models. Neurovascular functioning and microembolic signals were assessed with transcranial Doppler ultrasound of the middle cerebral artery. Associations between neurovascular indices and cognitive change were assessed with linear regression analyses. RESULTS: On group level, the CEA patients improved more than controls in working memory, whereas no cognitive deterioration was detected. Also on individual level, improvement was most frequently observed in working memory. Worse preoperative cerebrovascular reactivity was related with improvement in cognitive functions of the ipsilateral hemisphere. Low preoperative pulsatility index was associated with improvement in executive functioning and ipsilateral cognitive functions. Poorer preoperative blood flow velocity associated with improvement in complex attention. Microembolic signals were rare. CONCLUSION: The present findings suggest that CEA may have beneficial long-term effects on cognition. These effects may specifically involve patients with impaired preoperative circulatory adaptive mechanisms.

Endarterectomía carotídea / Carotid endarterectomy

El autor de este artículo describe personalmente la técnica de la endarterectomía carotídea clásica con algunos detalles personales que puedan ser de utilidad o de reflexión para el lector.(AU)

The author of this paper personally describes the classical carotid endarterectomy technique with some personaldetails that may be useful or thought-provoking for the reader.(AU)

Ocular Ischemic Syndrome and the Role of Carotid Artery Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Ocular ischemic syndrome (OIS) is a rare presentation of atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis that can result in permanent visual loss. This severely disabling syndrome remains under diagnosed and undertreated due to lack of awareness; especially since it requires expedited multidisciplinary care. The relevance of early diagnosis and treatment is increasing due to an increasing prevalence of cerebrovascular disease. METHODS: The long-term visual and cerebrovascular outcomes following intervention for nonarteritic OIS, remain poorly described and were the objective of this concise review. We conducted a PubMed search to include all English language publications (cohort studies and case reports) between 2002 and 2023. RESULTS: A total of 33 studies (479 patients) report the outcomes of treatment of OIS with carotid endarterectomy (CEA, 304 patients, 19 studies), and carotid artery stenting (CAS, 175 patients, 14 studies). Visual outcomes were improved or did not worsen in 447 patients (93.3%). No periprocedural stroke was reported. Worsening visual symptoms were rare (35 patients, 7.3%); they occurred in the immediate postoperative period secondary to ocular hypoperfusion (3 patients) and in the late postoperative period due to progression of systemic atherosclerotic disease. Symptomatic recurrence due to recurrent stenosis after CEA was reported in 1 patient (0.21%); this was managed successfully with CAS. None of these studies report the results of transcarotid artery revascularization, the long-term operative outcome or stroke rate. CONCLUSIONS: OIS remains to be an underdiagnosed condition. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are crucial in reversal or stabilization of OIS symptoms. An expedited multidisciplinary approach between vascular surgery and ophthalmology services is necessary to facilitate timely treatment and optimize outcome. If diagnosed early, both CEA and CAS have been associated with visual improvement and prevention of progressive visual loss.

Bailout Distal Internal Carotid Artery Stenting after Carotid Endarterectomy: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Distal internal carotid artery (ICA) stenting may be employed as a bailout maneuver when an inadequate end point or clamp injury is encountered at the time of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in a surgically inaccessible region of the distal ICA. We sought to characterize the indications, technique, and outcomes for this infrequently encountered clinical scenario. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent distal ICA stenting at the time of CEA at our institution between September 2008 and July 2022. Procedural details and postoperative follow-up were reviewed for each patient. RESULTS: Six patients were identified during the study period. All were male with an age range of 63 to 82 years. Five underwent carotid revascularization for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, and one patient was treated for amaurosis fugax. Three patients were on dual antiplatelet therapy preoperatively, whereas 2 were on aspirin monotherapy, and one was on aspirin and low-dose rivaroxaban. Five patients underwent CEA with patch angioplasty, and one underwent eversion CEA. The indication for stenting was distal ICA dissection due to clamp or shunt injury in 2 patients and an inadequate distal ICA end point in 4 patients. In all cases, access for stenting was obtained under direct visualization within the common carotid artery, and a standard carotid stent was deployed with its proximal aspect landing within the endarterectomized site. Embolic protection was typically achieved via proximal common carotid artery and external carotid artery clamping for flow arrest with aspiration of debris before restoration of antegrade flow. There was 100% technical success. Postoperatively, 2 patients were found to have a cranial nerve injury, likely occurring due to the need for high ICA exposure. Median length of stay was 2 days (range 1-7 days) with no instances of perioperative stroke or myocardial infarction. All patients were discharged on dual antiplatelet therapy with no further occurrence of stroke, carotid restenosis, or reintervention through a median follow-up of 17 months. CONCLUSIONS: Distal ICA stenting is a useful adjunct in the setting of CEA complicated by inadequate end point or vessel dissection in a surgically inaccessible region of the ICA and can minimize the need for high-risk extensive distal dissection of the ICA in this situation.

Thirty-day outcomes of carotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Technological and surgical approaches to carotid artery stenting (CAS) have evolved. Modern randomised controlled trials comparing CAS and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are limited, and information about updated post-intervention outcomes are mostly from retrospective, small studies. AIMS: This study aims to compare the 30-day outcomes of stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and death with propensity-matched groups of CEA and CAS in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients over a recent study period of new CAS technologies and approaches. METHODS: A retrospective, observational, multicentre analysis was conducted including consecutive symptomatic and asymptomatic patients treated with either primary CEA or CAS for internal carotid artery stenosis, between 2015 and 2022. Patients were propensity score-matched based on comorbidities and assessed according to symptom status. Primary endpoints include composite ipsilateral stroke, TIA, AMI and death within 30 days. Secondary endpoints include technical success and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: From a cohort of 1,110 patients, propensity matching produced 269 distinct treatment pairs (n=538). Most patients were asymptomatic (n=456, 85%). All 6 strokes were minor (CEA=2; CAS=4) and registered among asymptomatic patients. One AMI (CEA) and 1 patient death (CAS) were reported among symptomatic patients. Composite stroke/AMI/death were not significantly different between both types of symptom status and both revascularisation techniques (p=0.44 and p=1, respectively). Technical success was 100%. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in asymptomatic patients treated with CAS compared to those treated with CEA (p=0.05), but no difference was registered among symptomatic patients (p=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Propensity-matched analysis suggests that CAS has similar postprocedural outcomes for stroke, AMI and death at 30 days compared to CEA.

Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy: Insights from a single-center retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in individuals with carotid artery stenosis in the context of a tertiary care center. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective cohort investigation between 2015-2022. Patient data includes demographics, risk factors, preoperative medications, and operative details. The primary outcomes were 30-day postoperative stroke and mortality rates, while the secondary outcome of the study was to assess the morbidity of the procedure. RESULTS: The mean age of the 54 patients was 66.9±9.88 years, and 57.4% were men. The 30-day stroke rate was 3.7%, and the mortality rate was 1.9%. Most patients did not develop postoperative complications; however, surgical site hematoma was the most common complication encountered (12.9%). Long-term follow-up showed disease regression in 68.5% of patients, with a minority of patients developing ipsilateral restenosis. Admission to an intensive care monitoring unit was the only independent predictor of postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: This study provided insights into the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in patients with carotid artery stenosis, emphasizing the importance of careful patient selection and postoperative monitoring. Perioperative risks, including stroke and mortality, were within acceptable limits. Further research incorporating structured and non-structured data for predictive analyses, should explore refining patient profiling and optimizing treatment approaches for different carotid artery stenosis clinical and morphological presentations.

Short-term outcomes after selective shunt during carotid endarterectomy: A propensity score matching analysis / Resultados a corto plazo después de shunting selectivo durante la endarterectomía carotídea con anestesia regional: un análisis de propensity score-matching

Introduction and objectives: Carotid cross-clamping during carotid endarterectomy might lead to intraoperative neurologic deficits, increasing stroke/death risk. If deficits are detected, carotid shunting has been recommended to reduce the risk of stroke. However, shunting may sustain a specific chance of embolic events and subsequently incurring harm. Current evidence is still questionable regarding its clear benefit. The aim is to determine whether a policy of selective shunt impacts the complication rate following an endarterectomy. Material and methods: From January 2013 to May 2021, all patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia with intraoperative neurologic alteration were retrieved. Patients submitted to selective shunt were compared to a non-shunt group. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Differences between the groups and clinical outcomes were calculated, resorting to univariate analysis. Results: Ninety-eight patients were selected, from which 23 were operated on using a shunt. After PSM, 22 non-shunt patients were compared to 22 matched shunted patients. Concerning demographics and comorbidities, both groups were comparable to pre and post-PSM, except for chronic heart failure, which was more prevalent in shunted patients (26.1%, P=0.036) in pre-PSM analysis. Regarding 30-day stroke and score Clavien–Dindo≥2, no significant association was found (P=0.730, P=0.635 and P=0.942, P=0.472, correspondingly, for pre and post-PSM). Conclusions: In this cohort, resorting to shunting did not demonstrate an advantage regarding 30-day stroke or a Clavien–Dindo≥2 rates. Nevertheless, additional more extensive studies are mandatory to achieve precise results concerning the accurate utility of carotid shunting in this subset of patients under regional anesthesia.(AU)

Introducción y objetivos: El pinzamiento carotídeo durante la endarterectomía carotídea podría provocar déficits neurológicos intraoperatorios, lo que aumenta el riesgo de accidente cerebrovascular/muerte. Si se detectan déficits, se ha recomendado la derivación carotídea para reducir el riesgo de accidente cerebrovascular. Sin embargo, la derivación puede sostener una posibilidad específica de eventos embólicos y, posteriormente, provocar daños. La evidencia actual aún es cuestionable con respecto a su claro beneficio. El objetivo es determinar si una política de derivación selectiva afecta la tasa de complicaciones después de una endarterectomía. Material y métodos: Desde enero de 2013 hasta mayo de 2021 se recuperaron todos los pacientes sometidos a endarterectomía carotídea bajo anestesia regional con alteración neurológica intraoperatoria. Los pacientes sometidos a derivación selectiva se compararon con un grupo sin derivación. Se realizó una coincidencia de puntuación de propensión (PSM) 1:1. Se calcularon las diferencias entre los grupos y los resultados clínicos recurriendo al análisis univariado. Resultados: Se seleccionaron 98 pacientes, de los cuales 23 fueron intervenidos mediante derivación. Después de la PSM se compararon 22 pacientes sin derivación con 22 pacientes emparejados con derivación. Con respecto a la demografía y las comorbilidades, ambos grupos fueron comparables a los de antes y después de la PSM, excepto por la insuficiencia cardíaca crónica, que fue más prevalente en los pacientes con derivación (26,1%, p=0,036) en el análisis previo a la PSM. En cuanto al accidente cerebrovascular a los 30 días y la puntuación de Clavien-Dindo≥2, no se encontró asociación significativa (p=0,730, p=0,635 y p=0,942, p=0,472, correspondientemente, para pre y post-PSM). Conclusiones: En esta cohorte recurrir a la derivación no demostró una ventaja con respecto a las tasas de ictus a los 30 días o Clavien-Dindo≥2...(AU)

[Advisability of carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients]. / Tselesoobraznost' karotidnoi endarterektomii u asimptomnykh bol'nykh. Analiticheskii obzor.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal treatment strategy for patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The authors reviewed clinical guidelines for the management of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis 60-99%, as well as medical studies and meta-analyses comparing carotid endarterectomy and optimal drug therapy in asymptomatic patients between 1993 and 2023. RESULTS: The choice of treatment strategy for patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is still a controversial issue. There were several large randomized clinical trials comparing carotid endarterectomy with optimal medical therapy in asymptomatic patients at the end of the 20th century. However, drug therapy has undergone significant changes calling into question the relevance of previous results. This review highlights the evolution of management of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis and also presents modern approaches to the treatment of these patients. CONCLUSION: Patients younger 75 years old gain an advantage from carotid endarterectomy with small perioperative risk compared to optimal drug therapy and yearly risk of cerebral embolism. Patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis 80-99% are candidates for carotid endarterectomy due to higher risk of acute cerebrovascular accident at least until more data are available. The choice of the best tactics for a particular patient should be made individually depending on own experience and patient's adherence to therapy and lifestyle correction. The results of the ACTRIS (2025) and CREST-2 (2026) studies are expected to clarify this issue.