Increasing incidence of IV-drug use associated endocarditis in southern West Virginia and potential economic impact.

BACKGROUND: The opioid crisis has disproportionally affected Appalachia. One of the potentially lethal and costly complications associated with IV drug use is infective endocarditis (IE). The goal of this study was to assess the trend and costs of substance abuse associated IE admissions in Southern West Virginia. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of cost, incidence, and geographic patterns of all patients admitted over the last decade with concomitant drug abuse (cocaine, amphetamine, sedative, and other/mixed drug abuse) and IE in the largest tertiary care center for Southern West Virginia. A time series model was used to investigate the effect of drug use on the incidence of IE. RESULTS: A total of 462 patients were hospitalized with IE and concomitant illicit drug use. IE cases increased from 26 admissions in 2008 to 66 in 2015. Patterns of increases in mixed drug use (DRG most often associated with IV drug use in our center) mirrored increases in IE (P = 0.001). From 2008 to 2015, the total hospital charges were $17 306 464 on 462 cases of illicit drug associated IE. Only a fraction of the billed fees (22%) was collected ($3 829 701). CONCLUSIONS: The number of patients hospitalized with IE has dramatically increased over the last decade in a pattern that mirrors the increase in mixed drug use. The majority of payers were from underfunded state programs or private pay and thus, only 22% of the hospital charges were paid, leaving a hospital deficit of over $13 476 763 during the study period.

Reevaluation of the impact of methicillin-resistance on outcomes in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is highly prevalent in hospitals, and has recently emerged in the community. The impact of methicillin-resistance on mortality and medical costs for patients with S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) requires reevaluation. METHODS: We searched studies with SAB or endocarditis using electronic databases including Ovid-Medline, Embase-Medline, and Cochrane Library, as well as five local databases for published studies during the period January 2000 to September 2011. RESULTS: A total of 2,841 studies were identified, 62 of which involved 17,563 adult subjects and were selected as eligible. A significant increase in overall mortality associated with MRSA, compared to that with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), was evidenced by an odds ratio (OR) of 1.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.73 to 2.21; p < 0.01). In 13 endocarditis studies, MRSA increased the risk of mortality, with an OR of 2.65 (95% CI, 1.46 to 4.80). When three studies, which compared mortality rates between CA-MRSA and CA-MSSA, were combined, the risk of methicillin-resistance increased 3.23-fold compared to MSSA (95% CI, 1.25 to 8.34). The length of hospital stay in the MRSA group was 10 days longer than that in the MSSA group (95% CI, 3.36 to 16.70). Of six studies that reported medical costs, two were included in the analysis, which estimated medical costs to be $9,954.58 (95% CI, 8,951.99 to 10,957.17). CONCLUSION: MRSA is still associated with increased mortality, longer hospital stays and medical costs, compared with MSSA in SAB in studies published since the year 2000.

Efficiency of a self-administered outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (s-opat) for infective endocarditis within the context of a shortened hospital admission based on hospital at home program.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of treatment of infectious endocarditis (IE) via Self-administered Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (S-OPAT) supported by a shortening hospital admission program in a hospitalization-at-home unit (HAH), including a short review of the literature. METHODS: Ambispective cohort study of 57 episodes of IE in 54 patients treated in an HAH unit between 1988 and 2014 who receive S-OPAT after prior intra-hospital clinical stabilization. Characteristics of each episode of IE, safety and efficiency of the care model, were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-three (76%) patients were males with a median age of 61 years (SD = 16.5). A total of 37 (65%) episodes affected the native valve (42% the aortic valve). In 75%, a micro-organism was isolated, of which 88% were Gram-positive bacteria. No deaths occurred during HAH program, clinical complications appeared in 30% of episodes, only 6 patients were re-admitted to hospital although no patient died. In the 12 months' follow-up 3 cases had a recurrence. The average cost of a day stay in HAH was €174 while in traditional cardiology hospitalization was €1100. The total average cost of treatment of each episode of IE managed entirely in hospital was calculated as €54,723. Application of the S-OPAT model based on HAH meant a cost reduction of 32.72%. CONCLUSIONS: In suitably selected patients, treatment of IE based on S-OPAT supported by a shortening hospital admission care program by means of referral to a HAH unit is a safe and efficient care model which entails a significant cost saving for the public healthcare system.

Surgery for prosthetic valve endocarditis: associations between morbidity, mortality and costs.

OBJECTIVES: Surgery for prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality as well as with increased resource utilization and costs. For risk and cost reduction, an understanding of contributing factors and interrelations is essential. METHODS: Out of 1080 heart valve procedures performed between January 2010 and December 2012, 41 patients underwent surgery for PVE. Complete economic data were available for 30 of them (study cohort). The patients' mean age was 64 ± 12 years (range 37-79 years), and 73% were men. The clinical course was reviewed and morbidity, mortality and costs as well as associations between them were analysed. The cost matrix for each individual patient was obtained from the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK GmbH, Germany). The median follow-up was 2.6 years [interquartile range (IQR) 3.7 years; 100% complete]. RESULTS: Preoperative status was critical (EuroSCORE II >20%) in 43% of patients. Staphylococci were the most common infecting micro-organisms (27%). The operative mortality rate (≤30 days) was 17%. At 1 year, the overall survival rate was 71 ± 9%. At least one disease- or surgery-related complication affected 21 patients (early morbidity 70%), >1 complication affected 12 patients (40%). There was neither a recurrence of endocarditis, nor was a reoperation required. The mean total hospital costs were 42.6 ± 37.4 Thousand Euro (T€), median 25.7 T€, IQR 28.4 T€ and >100 T€ in 10% of cases. Intensive care unit/intermediate care (ICU/IMC) and operation accounted for 40.4 ± 18.6 and 25.7 ± 12.1% of costs, respectively. There was a significant correlation (Pearson's sample correlation coefficient) between total costs and duration of hospital stay (r = 0.83, P < 0.001) and between ICU/IMC costs and duration of ICU/IMC stay (r = 0.97, P < 0.001). The median daily hospital costs were 1.8 T€/day, but >2.4 T€/day in 25% of patients (upper quartile). The following pattern of associations was identified (P < 0.05). Early mortality was related to preoperative morbidity and postoperative renal failure. Early morbidity was associated with preoperative morbidity and urgency. Total costs were mainly explained by preoperative morbidity, postoperative morbidity and urgency. High EuroSCORE II, complex surgery, need for mechanical circulatory support as well as postoperative mortality and morbidity increased daily costs. CONCLUSIONS: The timely diagnosis and treatment of these patients must be a priority, as preoperative morbidity is the major contributor towards mortality, morbidity and costs after surgery for PVE.

[Pharmacoeconomic analysis of the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with daptomycin or vancomycin]. / Análisis farmacoeconómico del tratamiento de la bacteriemia por Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina con daptomicina y vancomicina.

INTRODUCTION: The increased morbidity, mortality and high costs associated with bacteremia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major public health problem. Pharmacoeconomic analysis was performed to compare the efficiency of daptomycin (DAP) against vancomycin (VAN) in the treatment of this infection. METHODS: Retrospective, deterministic and probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis. The effectiveness of the treatments was estimated from the results of a randomized clinical trial, which compared DAP (6 mg / kg IV daily) and VAN (1 g IV every 12 hours), both with or without gentamicin (1 mg / kg IV every 8 hours). Resource utilization was estimated from the clinical trial of the drug datasheets and Spanish sources, the unit costs were obtained also from Spanish sources. Monte Carlo probabilistic analysis and deterministic analysis were performed. RESULTS: The clinical trial cure rates were higher with DAP (44.4%, 95% CI 43.5 to 45.4%) than with VAN (31.8%, 95% CI 30.9 to 32.7%) not statistically significant (p = 0.2203) but with economic impact. With DAP would occur less costs due to treatment failure (rescue antibiotics, additional tests, prolonged hospital stay and adverse reactions) than with VAN. In the base case the average cost of disease per patient was € 12,329 to € 12,696 with DAP and VAN (difference of 367 €). DAP treatment was dominant (more effective, with lower costs than VAN) both in the deterministic and probabilistic analysis. In the Monte Carlo simulation, DAP was the most cost-effective treatment in 100% of the 10,000 simulations, for a willingness to pay € 12,000 per additional cure (approximate cost of MRSA bacteraemia episode). CONCLUSIONS: According to this model, daptomycin is more cost-effective than vancomycin in treating MRSA bacteremia. The higher cost of acquisition of daptomycin does not imply a higher cost of treating this infection.

Outcomes and costs associated with a history of vancomycin exposure in patients with MRSA-related complicated bacteremia and infective endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is the primary cause of complicated bacteremia (CB) and infective endocarditis (IE). Studies have compared the costs of treatment with vancomycin to those of other agents, as well as the efficacy and tolerability of these treatments. However, a literature search found no published studies of the effects of vancomycin exposure on outcomes and hospital costs in patients with CB or IE due to MRSA. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a quantitative relationship between the duration of vancomycin treatment or cumulative vancomycin exposure and outcomes or costs in patient with CB or IE due to MRSA. METHODS: Electronic medical records of confirmed cases of MRSA-related CB or IE from July 1, 2006, to June 30, 2008, were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with a history of vancomycin exposure or no vancomycin exposure. Those who received vancomycin were stratified by the amount of drug administered or the duration of treatment to determine the relationship between treatment and outcomes. Data collected included demographic information, treatment information, attributable mortality, MIC data, and hospital costs. Classification and regression tree analysis (CART) was used to determine whether a history of vancomycin exposure was associated with treatment failure, attributable mortality, or both. The Mann-Whitney U test and the Fisher exact test were used for univariate analyses, and logistic regression was used for multivariate modeling. RESULTS: Data from 50 patients were evaluated (CB, 32; IE, 18). Overall rates of failure and attributable mortality were 32% and 16%, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the variables and costs. The CART break points for failure were ≥18.75 g and ≥14 days of vancomycin treatment in the previous 3 years; for attributable mortality, the CART break points were ≥45 g and ≥31 days. In the final multivariate model for failure, ≥18.75 g and ≥14 days of vancomycin treatment in the previous 3 years were predictors of failure (both, P = 0.002). Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (P = 0.04), ≥45 g (P = 0.002), and ≥31 days of treatment (P = 0.002) in the previous 3 years were predictors of attributable mortality after adjustment for all covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Using the present model, cumulative vancomycin amount and duration were associated with attributable mortality and clinical failure but not with costs.

Economic implications of infections of implantable cardiac devices in a single institution.

INTRODUCTION: The use of medical devices, such as cardiac pacemakers, prosthetic heart valves and vascular prostheses, has become a routine treatment procedure in cardiovascular medicine. Unfortunately, bacterial infections of these devices are a serious and sometimes life-threatening for the patient, necessitating explantation. Despite implementing different prophylactic strategies to avoid contamination of the device, infections do occur. This study analysed the additional hospital costs associated with managing cardiac device infections, with special focus on cardiac pacemakers/defibrillators, prosthetic heart valves and vascular prostheses. METHODS: Out of more than 2000 operations performed in our institution in 2006, we had 462 implantations/replacements of cardiac pacemakers/implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), 577 valve replacement procedures and 613 vascular operations. Among these, we analysed all patients who received operations because of an infection of their cardiac or vascular device. Our investigations focussed on standard parameters regarding additional hospital costs, including length of stay in hospital, required time in the operating room and time in the intensive care unit. RESULTS: In 2006, we had nine cases (n=9) of prosthetic valve endocarditis in our hospital. The average length of stay in hospital for these patients was 25 days, resulting in euro72096 of additional hospital costs per case. Infection of vascular prostheses (n=6) leads to euro35506 per case and 28 days in the hospital. If an infection of cardiac pacemakers (n=7) does occur, the therapy causes a mean additional hospital cost of euro7091. CONCLUSION: Cardiac device infections are serious and sometimes life-threatening. Therapy and eradication are difficult and protracted and cause high additional hospital costs. Based on our statistical data and the mean incidence of cardiac device infections, we presume for Germany between euro38 and euro140 million in additional hospital costs per year are incurred by infections of implantable cardiovascular devices. Active surveillance and establishment of a central register with documentation of every implantation and the occurrence of any infection can only realise detailed estimates of the economic damage caused by infection of cardiovascular implants. In consideration of the economic consequences, successful strategies must be developed to reduce the incidence of infections.

Cost-Effectiveness of daptomycin versus vancomycin and gentamicin for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and/or endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an increasingly common cause of bacteremia and endocarditis. The cost-effectiveness (CE) of daptomycin was compared with that of vancomycin-gentamicin in patients with MRSA bacteremia with or without endocarditis. METHODS: With use of data from an open-label, randomized study comparing daptomycin with vancomycin-gentamicin in the aforementioned patient population, 3 cost strata were considered: (1) study drug acquisition (daptomycin, $0.37/mg; vancomycin, $7/g; and gentamicin, $0.12/mg); (2) stratum 1 plus the cost of therapy for treatment failures and adverse events, therapeutic drug monitoring, and preparation and administration of all medications; and (3) stratum 2 plus hospital bed costs. Drug costs were based on mean wholesale price, with other costs based on those for a typical community hospital. Cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated as cost divided by proportion of successes. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying the study drug cost. RESULTS: Forty-five (20 successes) and 44 (14 successes) patients received daptomycin and vancomycin-gentamicin, respectively. The respective median cost-effectiveness ratios for daptomycin and vancomycin-gentamicin for each cost stratum were as follows: $4082 (range, $1062-$13,893) and $560 (range, $66-$1649) for stratum 1 (P < .001); $4582 (range, $1109-$21,882) and $1635 (range, $163-$33,444) for stratum 2 (P = .026); $23,639 (range, $6225-$141,132) and $26,073 (range, $5349-$187,287) for stratum 3 (P = .82). Sensitivity analyses indicated that if the cost of vancomycin was $0, strata 3 cost-effectiveness ratios did not differ ($23,639 and $25,668, respectively; P = .85). Similar results between groups were seen among patients with bacteremia. CONCLUSIONS: When all costs of therapy were considered, the cost-effectiveness of daptomycin and vancomycin-gentamicin was similar, even if the cost of vancomycin was $0.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis for febrile children who have cardiac lesions and undergo urinary catheterization in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To prevent bacterial endocarditis (BE) in those at risk, the American Heart Association recommends antibiotics for patients who have a known urinary tract infection and are about to undergo urinary catheterization (UC). In young children who have cardiac lesions and undergo UC for fever without a source, the problem with prophylaxis only in the presence of infected urine is that the presence of urinary tract infection is unknown before testing. This study was conducted to determine the cost-effectiveness of BE prophylaxis before UC in febrile children aged 0-24 months with moderate-risk cardiac lesions. METHODS: We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of BE prophylaxis compared with no prophylaxis from the societal perspective. Clinical outcomes were based on BE incidence and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Probabilities were derived from the medical literature. Costs were derived from national and local sources in US dollars for the reference year 2000, using a discount rate of 3%. RESULTS: On the basis of the analysis, prophylaxis prevents 7 BE cases per 1 million children treated. When antibiotic-associated deaths were included, the no-prophylaxis strategy was more effective and less costly than the prophylaxis strategy. When antibiotic-associated deaths were excluded, amoxicillin cost 10 million dollars per QALY gained and 70 million dollars per case prevented. For vancomycin, it was 13 million dollars per QALY gained and 95 million dollars per case prevented. The results were robust to variations in the prophylactic efficacy of antibiotics, incidence of bacteremia after UC, incidence of BE after bacteremia, and costs associated with BE prophylaxis and treatment. CONCLUSION: In the emergency department, BE prophylaxis before UC in febrile children who are aged 0 to 24 months and have moderate-risk cardiac lesions is not a cost-effective use of health care resources.

Echocardiography in patients with suspected endocarditis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the appropriate use of echocardiography for patients with suspected endocarditis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We constructed a decision tree and Markov model using published data to simulate the outcomes and costs of care for patients with suspected endocarditis. RESULTS: Transesophageal imaging was optimal for patients who had a prior probability of endocarditis that is observed commonly in clinical practice (4% to 60%). In our base-case analysis (a 45-year-old man with a prior probability of endocarditis of 20%), use of transesophageal imaging improved quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALYs) by 9 days and reduced costs by $18 per person compared with the use of transthoracic echocardiography. Sequential test strategies that reserved the use of transesophageal echocardiography for patients who had an inadequate transthoracic study provided similar QALYs compared with the use of transesophageal echocardiography alone, but cost $230 to $250 more. For patients with prior probabilities of endocarditis greater than 60%, the optimal strategy is to treat for endocarditis without reliance on echocardiography for diagnosis. Patients with a prior probability of less than 2% should receive treatment for bacteremia without imaging. Transthoracic imaging was optimal for only a narrow range of prior probabilities (2% or 3%) of endocarditis. CONCLUSION: The appropriate use of echocardiography depends on the prior probability of endocarditis. For patients whose prior probability of endocarditis is 4% to 60%, initial use of transesophageal echocardiography provides the greatest quality-adjusted survival at a cost that is within the range for commonly accepted health interventions.

Cost-effectiveness of infective endocarditis prophylaxis for mitral valve prolapse with or without a mitral regurgitant murmur.

To assess the cost-effectiveness of prevention of infective endocarditis (IE) and to calculate cost-effectiveness of currently recommended regimens in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP), data on risk of death, complications, and health-care use, and cumulative incremental health-care costs due to the occurrence of IE were combined with data on the prevalence and manifestations of MVP, estimated years of life lost, and efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis. Effectiveness and costs of standard endocarditis prophylaxis regimens were calculated per IE case prevented and years of life saved. Under the most likely scenario, oral amoxicillin prophylaxis for all MVP patients would prevent 32 cases of IE per million dental procedures at approximate costs of $119,000 per prevented case and $21,000 per year of life saved. Limiting prophylaxis to patients with mitral murmurs would prevent 80 cases of IE per million procedures at costs of about $19,000 per prevented case and $3,000 per year of life saved. Erythromycin prophylaxis was slightly less expensive than amoxicillin per benefit because of lower cost and lack of drug anaphylaxis, whereas intravenous ampicillin was 7 to 30 times more costly. Sensitivity analyses suggested that erythromycin prophylaxis might be cost-saving under some scenarios, whereas intravenous ampicillin use might cause net loss of life. Thus, prevention with oral antibiotics of the cumulative morbidity and incremental health care costs due to IE in MVP patients is reasonably cost-effective for MVP patients with mitral murmurs.

Clinical and health care cost consequences of infective endocarditis in mitral valve prolapse.

Although mitral valve prolapse (MVP) predisposes to infective endocarditis (IE), both the clinical consequences of IE and the increment in health care costs it imposes on patients with MVP remain uncertain. Accordingly, 21 MVP patients with IE and 41 age- and sex-matched control subjects with initially uncomplicated MVP were followed (95% complete) a mean of 8 years. Outcomes included death, complications, health care use and cumulative incremental costs. More MVP patients with IE died (25 vs 5%, p < 0.05), underwent valve surgery (40 vs 8%, p < 0.01), had heart failure (50 vs 5%, p < 0.01) or embolization (53 vs 11%, p < 0.01), underwent cardiac catheterization (40 vs 13%), and saw their physicians > 2 times per year (88 vs 33%). The cumulative incremental cost of IE (1990 dollars) was $46,132 per case. Thus, IE in patients with MVP causes considerable cumulative morbidity and incremental health care costs.

Cost effectiveness of prophylaxis in dental practice to prevent infective endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Although antimicrobial prophylaxis for infective endocarditis (IE) is common practice for many dental procedures, there is little information on whether it represents value for money. A study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylaxis for all at risk patients in routine dental practice with published data from the United Kingdom. METHODS: The risk of contracting infective endocarditis was calculated from published data to find (for high risk patients) both the annual number of deaths attributable to infective endocarditis and the number of high risk dental procedures performed without prophylaxis. Costs are estimated by examining the notes of 63 patients with proved IE during the decade 1980-90. RESULTS: Such prophylaxis is highly cost effective before dental extractions, but its value for other invasive dental procedures is unproved. It was calculated that, for every 10,000 extractions in at risk patients, appropriate prophylaxis will prevent 5.7 deaths and a further 22.85 cases of non-fatal IE. This represents a saving in the costs of hospital care of 289,600 pounds for 10,000 extractions. CONCLUSION: Prophylaxis to prevent IE in at risk patients undergoing dental extraction is highly cost effective. Net savings each year throughout the United Kingdom, that might be achieved by improving the existing proportion of such patients given antibiotics from its present level of about 50% would amount to 2.5 million pounds and would prevent over 50 deaths.

Ethics, economics, and endocarditis. The physician's role in resource allocation.

Medical decisions are increasingly shaped by financial considerations. Biomedical ethicists have encouraged the practicing physician to remain the agent of the individual patient, sometimes pitting physicians against health care institutions. The limitation of medical resources has given rise to the need for a clear conceptual basis for allocating scarce resources. The role of resource gatekeeper may be used to the indigent patient's disadvantage when the principles of triage are used incorrectly in situations of relative scarcity. To allocate limited resources fairly under changing policy and economic conditions, health care institutions should ensure that systematic processes, such as those of ethics consultants and committees, are readily available to help resolve problematic cases and policies. Physicians with clinical judgment and a primary commitment to patient care must assume active roles in these processes in order to build an ethically sound framework for clinical decision making in times of relatively scarce resources.