Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Virchows Arch ; 473(6): 665-678, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30324234

ABSTRACT

This review addresses known features and recent developments in the histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular characterization of endometrial stromal neoplasms. We discuss the spectrum of these tumors, from the benign endometrial stromal nodule to low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma to uterine undifferentiated sarcomas with a special emphasis on the expanding group of high-grade stromal sarcomas, recently added to the 2014 WHO classification, not only discussing the well-established YWHAE-FAM22 tumors but also two new groups, presenting with BCOR alterations including those with BCOR tandem internal duplications or NTRK fusions. It is likely that this high-grade category of endometrial stromal tumors will expand as increasing molecular data is available.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms/classification , Endometrial Stromal Tumors/classification , Endometrial Neoplasms/genetics , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Endometrial Stromal Tumors/genetics , Endometrial Stromal Tumors/pathology , Female , Humans
3.
J Clin Pathol ; 68(5): 325-32, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25595274

ABSTRACT

Endometrial stromal tumours (EST) are rare tumours of endometrial stromal origin that account for less than 2% of all uterine tumours. Recent cytogenetic and molecular advances in this area have improved our understanding of ESTs and helped refine their classification into more meaningful categories. Accordingly, the newly released 2014 WHO classification system recognises four categories: endometrial stromal nodule (ESN), low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HGESS) and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS). At the molecular level, these tumours may demonstrate a relatively simple karyotype with a defining chromosomal rearrangement (as in the majority of ESNs, LGESSs and YWHAE-rearranged HGESS) or demonstrate complex cytogenetic aberrations lacking specific rearrangements (as in UUSs). Herein we provide an update on this topic aimed at the practicing pathologist.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Endometrial Stromal Tumors/pathology , Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal/pathology , World Health Organization , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biopsy , Cell Differentiation , Diagnosis, Differential , Endometrial Neoplasms/chemistry , Endometrial Neoplasms/classification , Endometrial Neoplasms/genetics , Endometrial Stromal Tumors/chemistry , Endometrial Stromal Tumors/classification , Endometrial Stromal Tumors/genetics , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Karyotype , Karyotyping , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Predictive Value of Tests , Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal/chemistry , Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal/classification , Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal/genetics , Terminology as Topic
4.
Adv Anat Pathol ; 21(6): 383-93, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25299308

ABSTRACT

Endometrial stromal tumors are rare uterine mesenchymal neoplasms that have intrigued pathologists for years, not only because they commonly pose diagnostic dilemmas, but also because the classification and pathogenesis of these tumors has been widely debated. The current World Health Organization recognizes 4 categories of endometrial stromal tumor: endometrial stromal nodule (ESN), low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS), and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS). uterine sarcoma. These categories are defined by the presence of distinct translocations as well as tumor morphology and prognosis. Specifically, the JAZF1-SUZ12 (formerly JAZF1-JJAZ1) fusion identifies a large proportion of ESN and LG-ESSs, whereas the YWHAE-FAM22 translocation identifies HG-ESSs. The latter tumors appear to have a prognosis intermediate between LG-ESS and UUS, which exhibits no specific translocation pattern. This review (1) presents the clinicopathologic features of endometrial stromal tumors; (2) discusses their immunophenotype; and (3) highlights the recent advances in molecular genetics which explain their pathogenesis and lend support for a new classification system.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms/classification , Endometrial Stromal Tumors/classification , Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal/classification , Terminology as Topic , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biopsy , Cell Differentiation , Co-Repressor Proteins , DNA-Binding Proteins , Diagnosis, Differential , Endometrial Neoplasms/chemistry , Endometrial Neoplasms/genetics , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Endometrial Stromal Tumors/chemistry , Endometrial Stromal Tumors/genetics , Endometrial Stromal Tumors/pathology , Female , Gene Fusion , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Phenotype , Polycomb Repressive Complex 2/genetics , Predictive Value of Tests , Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal/chemistry , Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal/genetics , Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal/pathology , Transcription Factors , Translocation, Genetic
5.
Histopathology ; 62(1): 124-37, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23240674

ABSTRACT

Smooth muscle and endometrial stromal tumours represent the two most common uterine mesenchymal neoplasms that may present diagnostic dilemmas for the practising surgical pathologist. Recent changes in morphological and staging criteria, as well as the discovery of new immunohistochemical markers, have improved the diagnosis and classification of these tumours. We highlight the difficulty in distinguishing tumour cell necrosis from infarct-type necrosis and the limited utility of p16 immunohistochemical expression in the diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma. We also discuss the controversial use of mitotic activity and necrosis as prognostic factors in endometrial stromal sarcomas. Emerging genetic information has also greatly expanded our understanding of 'sarcomagenesis' in both tumour types and may provide insight into potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of leiomyosarcoma and endometrial stromal sarcomas, harboring MED12 (mediator complex subunit 12) mutations and recurrent gene rearrangements, respectively. In this review, we discuss the core updates in the diagnosis and classification of uterine leiomyosarcomas and endometrial stromal sarcomas, highlighting new and important molecular genetic findings that may drive pathogenesis.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Stromal Tumors/diagnosis , Leiomyosarcoma/diagnosis , Uterine Neoplasms/diagnosis , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Diagnosis, Differential , Endometrial Stromal Tumors/classification , Endometrial Stromal Tumors/genetics , Endometrial Stromal Tumors/metabolism , Female , Gene Fusion , Gene Rearrangement , Humans , Infarction/diagnosis , Leiomyosarcoma/classification , Leiomyosarcoma/genetics , Leiomyosarcoma/metabolism , Mediator Complex/genetics , Mitosis , Mutation , Necrosis/diagnosis , Neoplasm Staging , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Prognosis , Uterine Neoplasms/classification , Uterine Neoplasms/genetics , Uterine Neoplasms/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...