Early Addition of Selexipag to Double Therapy for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Importance: A subgroup analysis of a randomized clinical trial established the efficacy of selexipag plus background therapy (monotherapy or double oral therapy [DOT]) vs placebo plus background therapy and found that the addition of selexipag within 6 months had an added benefit. However, the timing of selexipag addition to DOT and the incremental benefit in clinical practice is not well studied. Objective: To compare triple oral therapy (TOT) consisting of selexipag, endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA), and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) vs DOT consisting of ERA and PDE5i. Design, Setting, and Participants: This comparative effectiveness study was conducted using data from the US Komodo claims database to emulate a randomized trial. Patients aged 18 years or older with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treated with ERA plus PDE5i with records from July 2015 through June 2022 were duplicated to TOT and DOT and artificially censored when observed treatment deviated from assigned treatment. Hypothetical randomization was emulated using inverse probability of treatment weighting, and the study accounted for censoring-induced selection bias using inverse probability of censoring weighting. A pooled logistic model estimated the per-protocol difference between treatment groups. Data were analyzed from November 2022 through July 2023. Interventions: TOT (addition of selexipag within 3, 6, and 12 months of initiating DOT) vs DOT. Main Outcomes and Measures: Adjusted risk of all-cause hospitalization, PAH-related hospitalization, and PAH-related disease progression over a 2-year follow-up. Results: A total of 2966 patients with PAH (mean [SD] age, 54.3 [14.0] years; 2125 female [71.6%]) met eligibility criteria. Adding selexipag within 6 months of ongoing DOT was associated with a reduction in risk for all-cause hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.94), PAH-related hospitalization (aHR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.95), and PAH-related progression (aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.95) vs DOT alone. There were no associations if selexipag was initiated within 12 months for all-cause hospitalization, PAH-related hospitalization, or PAH-related disease progression. The association remained with a greater decrease in risk for disease progression vs DOT for selexipag initiation within 3 months (aHR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61-0.90). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that early selexipag addition to ERA plus PDE5i was associated with a reduction in risk of hospitalization and disease progression. These findings suggest that delays in selexipag initiation likely contribute to suboptimal patient and health system outcomes.

Aprocitentan: First Approval.

Aprocitentan (TRYVIO™) is a once-daily oral dual endothelin A (ETA) and B (ETB) receptor antagonist developed by Idorsia Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of hypertension. The endothelin pathway has been implicated in hypertension. Aprocitentan inhibits the binding of endothelin-1 to ETA and ETB receptors, thereby preventing its deleterious effects and lowering blood pressure. In March 2024, aprocitentan received its first approval in the USA for the treatment of hypertension in combination with other antihypertensive drugs, to lower blood pressure in adults who are not adequately controlled on other drugs. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of aprocitentan leading to this first approval for hypertension not adequately controlled on other drugs.

Comparative Effectiveness of Sotatercept and Approved Add-On Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Therapies: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Background: There are no direct comparisons of sotatercept to add-on therapies approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of add-on sotatercept versus other add-on therapies using a network meta-analysis. Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and clinicaltrials.gov until April 15, 2023, for randomized trials involving patients with PAH who were treated with add-on sotatercept or other add-on PAH therapies. Data Extraction: Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessments were performed independently and in duplicate using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. We performed a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis using the restricted maximum-likelihood estimator and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment development, and evaluation) approach. Synthesis: Our search found 18 trials (5,777 patients) eligible for analysis. Sotatercept reduces clinical worsening as compared with placebo (relative risk [RR], 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11-0.41; with high certainty). Sotatercept probably reduces clinical worsening more, compared with add-on endothelin receptor antagonists (RR, 0.28; 95% CI = 0.14-0.55), inhaled prostanoid (RR, 40.21; 95% CI = 0.07-0.67), and prostanoid taken orally (RR, 0.32; 95% CI = 0.16-0.67; all with moderate certainty). Sotatercept probably improves 6-minute-walk distance compared with placebo (mean difference [MD], 36.89 m; 95% CI = 25.26-48.51). Although sotatercept probably improves 6-minute-walk distance more than add-on endothelin receptor antagonists (MD, 18.38 m; 95% CI = 5.92-30.84) and prostanoid taken orally (MD, 25.66 m; 95% CI = 13.71-37.61), it did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference of 33 m (both with moderate certainty). Conclusions: Sotatercept is an effective add-on therapy for PAH, likely superior to many approved add-on PAH therapies in reducing clinical worsening.

Fixed-dose combination therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: Pros & cons.

Quality of life of patients suffering from chronic diseases is inevitably conditioned by the number of pills taken during the day. To improve patients' tolerability, compliance and quality of life and reduce healthcare costs, pharmaceutical companies are focusing on the commercialization of fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapies. The last ESC/ERS guidelines for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) recommend initial dual combination therapy for newly diagnosed patients at low or intermediate mortality risk. In this regard, polypills including an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5-i) could represent an useful therapeutic strategy, although with some limitations. To date, evidence about the use of FDCs in PAH is limited but future studies evaluating their safety and efficacy are welcome.

Population pharmacokinetics of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist aprocitentan in subjects with or without essential or resistant hypertension.

Aprocitentan is a novel, potent, dual endothelin receptor antagonist that recently demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of difficult-to-treat (resistant) hypertension. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model describing aprocitentan plasma concentration over time, to investigate relationships between subject-specific factors (covariates) and model parameters, and to quantify the influence of the identified covariates on the exposure to aprocitentan via model-based simulations, enabling judgment about the clinical relevance of the covariates.PK data from 902 subjects in ten Phase 1, one Phase 2, and one Phase 3 study were pooled to develop a joint population PK model. The concentration-time course of aprocitentan was described by a two-compartment model with absorption lag time, first-order absorption and elimination, and reduced relative bioavailability following very high doses of 300 and 600 mg.The population PK model described the observed data well. Volume and clearance parameters were associated with body weight. Renal function as reflected by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), hepatic impairment, and sex were identified as relevant covariates on clearance.The subject-specific characteristics of body weight, eGFR, hepatic impairment, and sex were shown to influence exposure parameters area under the concentration-time curve and maximum concentration in steady state to a limited extent, i.e., not more than 25% different from a reference subject, and therefore do not warrant dose adjustments.

Impact of rapid sequential combination therapy on distinct haemodynamic measures in newly diagnosed pulmonary arterial hypertension.

AIMS: In pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), upfront combination therapy with ERA and PDE5i is associated with a reduction in morbidity and mortality events and improves standard haemodynamics, but data remain limited. Aims of this study were (i) to capture detailed haemodynamic effects of rapid sequential dual combination therapy in patients with newly diagnosed PAH; (ii) to monitor the impact of treatment initiation on clinical variables and patients' risk status, and (iii) to compare the treatment effect in patients with 'classical PAH' and 'PAH with co-morbidities'. METHODS: Fifty patients (median age 57 [42-71] years, 66% female) with newly diagnosed PAH (76% idiopathic) were treated with a PD5i/sGC-S or ERA, followed by addition of the respective other drug class within 4 weeks. All patients underwent repeat right heart catheterization (RHC) during early follow-up. RESULTS: At early repeat RHC (7 ± 2 months), there were substantial reductions in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP: 52.2 ± 13.5 to 39.0 ± 10.6 mmHg; -25.3%), and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR: 12.1 ± 5.7 to 5.8 ± 3.1 WU; -52.1%), and an increase in cardiac index (2.1 ± 0.4 to 2.7 ± 0.7 mL/min/m2; +32.2%) (all P < 0.05). Haemodynamic improvements correlated with improved clinical parameters including 6-min walking distance (336 ± 315 to 389 ± 120 m), NTproBNP levels (1.712 ± 2.024 to 506 ± 550 ng/L, both P < 0.05) and WHO-FC at 12 months, resulting in improved risk status, and were found in patients with few (n = 37) or multiple cardiovascular co-morbidities (BMI > 30 kg/m2, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease [≥3]; n = 13), albeit baseline PVR in PAH patients with multiple co-morbidities was lower (9.3 ± 4.4 vs. 13.1 ± 5.9 WU) and PVR reduction less pronounced compared with those with few co-morbidities (-42.7% vs. -54.7%). However, comprehensive haemodynamic assessment considering further variables of prognostic relevance such as stroke volume index and pulmonary artery compliance showed similar improvements among the two groups (SVI: +50.0% vs. +49.2%; PAC: 91.7% vs. 100.0%). Finally, the 4-strata risk assessment approach was better able to capture treatment response as compared with other approaches, particularly in patients with co-morbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid sequential combination therapy with PDE5i/sGC-S and ERA substantially ameliorates cardiopulmonary haemodynamics at early follow-up in patients without, and to a lesser extent, with cardiovascular co-morbidities. This occurs in line with improvements of clinical parameters and risk status.

Comparative assessment of efficacy and safety of ambrisentan and bosentan in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: A meta-analysis.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Two endothelin receptor antagonists, ambrisentan and bosentan, have been demonstrated to be effective individually compared with placebo in the treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This network meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of ambrisentan and bosentan in patients with PAH. METHODS: Clinical trials were identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL/CCTR), EMBASE and PubMed databases. Weighted mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for continuous outcomes (6-min walk distance [6MWD] and Borg dyspnoea index [BDI]). Hazard ratio (HR) was calculated for binary outcomes, including clinical worsening, discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and liver dysfunction. Surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank the treatments in each index. RESULTS: Five clinical trials from four published studies (total patients: n = 920) were included. Ambrisentan and bosentan showed no significant difference in 6MWD (MD: -1.32; 95% CI: -27.87, 25.31, SUCRA score: ambrisentan 0.73, bosentan 0.77), BDI (MD: -0.16; 95% CI: -0.98, 0.65, SUCRA score: ambrisentan 0.83, bosentan 0.66), clinical worsening (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.33, 2.94, SUCRA score: ambrisentan 0.75, bosentan 0.74) and discontinuation due to AEs (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.11, 5.86, SUCRA score: ambrisentan 0.47, bosentan 0.57). However, ambrisentan was significantly better than bosentan with respect to abnormal liver function (HR: 23.18; 95% CI: 2.24, 377.20, SUCRA score: ambrisentan 0.99, bosentan 0.02). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The results of this network meta-analysis suggest that ambrisentan was similar to bosentan in efficacy, while it exhibited better tolerability with respect to abnormal liver function in comparison with bosentan, in patients with PAH.

Sunitinib-induced cardiac hypertrophy and the endothelin axis.

Anti-angiogenics drugs in clinical use for cancer treatment induce cardiotoxic side effects. The endothelin axis is involved in hypertension and cardiac remodelling, and addition of an endothelin receptor antagonist to the anti-angiogenic sunitinib was shown to reduce cardiotoxicity of sunitinib in mice. Here, we explored further the antidote effect of the endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan in sunitinib-treated animals on cardiac remodeling. Methods: Tumor-bearing mice treated per os daily by sunitinib or vehicle were imaged before and after 1, 3 and 6 weeks of treatment by positron emission tomography using [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose and by echocardiography. Non-tumor-bearing animals were randomly assigned to be treated per os daily by vehicle or sunitinib or macitentan or sunitinib+macitentan, and imaged by echocardiography after 5 weeks. Hearts were harvested for histology and molecular analysis at the end of in vivo exploration. Results: Sunitinib treatment increases left ventricular mass and ejection fraction and induces cardiac fibrosis. Sunitinib also induces an early increase in cardiac uptake of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose, which is significantly correlated with increased left ventricular mass at the end of treatment. Co-administration of macitentan prevents sunitinib-induced hypertension, increase in ejection fraction and cardiac fibrosis, but fails to prevent increase of the left ventricular mass. Conclusion: Early metabolic changes predict sunitinib-induced cardiac remodeling. Endothelin blockade can prevent some but not all cardiotoxic side-effects of sunitinib, in particular left ventricle hypertrophy that appears to be induced by sunitinib through an endothelin-independent mechanism.

Central Endothelin-1 Confers Analgesia by Triggering Spinal Neuronal Histone Deacetylase 5 (HDAC5) Nuclear Exclusion in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain in Mice.

The rationale of spinal administration of endothelin-1(ET-1) mediated anti-nociceptive effect has not been elucidated. ET-1 is reported to promote nuclear effluxion of histone deacetylase 5 (HDAC5) in myocytes, and spinal HDAC5 is implicated in modulation of pain processing. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether central ET-1 plays an anti-nociceptive role by facilitating spinal HDAC5 nuclear shuttling under neuropathic pain. Here, we demonstrate that upregulating spinal ET-1 attenuated the nociception induced by partial sciatic nerve ligation surgery and this analgesic effect mediated by ET-1 was attenuated by intrathecal injection of endothelin A receptor selective inhibitor (BQ123) or by blocking the exportation of nuclear HDAC5 by adeno-associated viruses targeting neuronal HDAC5 (AVV-HDAC5 S259/498A Mutant). Notably, ET-1 administration increased spinal glutamate acid decarboxylases (GAD65/67) expression via initiating HDAC5 nuclear exportation and increased the acetylation of histone 3 at lysine 9 (Acetyl-H3K9) in the promotor regions of spinal Gad1 and Gad2 genes. This was reversed by blocking endothelin A receptor function or by inhibiting the spinal neuronal nuclear exportation of HDAC5. Therefore, inducing spinal GABAergic neuronal HDAC5 nuclear exportation may be a novel therapeutic approach for managing neuropathic pain. PERSPECTIVE: Neuropathic pain is intractable in a clinical setting, and epigenetic regulation is considered to contribute to this processing. Characterizing the anti-nociceptive effect of ET-1 and investigating the associated epigenetic mechanisms in animal models may lead to the development of new therapeutic strategies and targets for treating neuropathic pain.

Risk Reduction and Hemodynamics with Initial Combination Therapy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Rationale: An initial oral combination of drugs is being recommended in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), but the effects of this approach on risk reduction and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) are not known.Objectives: To test the hypothesis that a low-risk status would be determined by the reduction of PVR in patients with PAH treated upfront with a combination of oral drugs.Methods: The study enrolled 181 treatment-naive patients with PAH (81% idiopathic) with a follow-up right heart catheterization at 6 months (interquartile range, 144-363 d) after the initial combination of endothelin receptor antagonist + phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor drugs and clinical evaluation and risk assessments by European guidelines and Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management scores.Measurements and Main Results: Initial combination therapy improved functional class and 6-minute-walk distance and decreased PVR by an average of 35% (median, 40%). One-third of the patients had a decrease in PVR <25%. This poor hemodynamic response was independently predicted by age, male sex, pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac index, and at echocardiography, a right/left ventricular surface area ratio of greater than 1 associated with low tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion of less than 18 mm. A low-risk status at 6 months was achieved or maintained in only 34.8% (Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management score) to 43.1% (European score) of the patients. Adding criteria of poor hemodynamic response improved prediction of a low-risk status.Conclusions: A majority of patients with PAH still insufficiently improved after 6 months of initial combinations of oral drugs is identifiable at initial evaluation by hemodynamic response criteria added to risk scores.

Effects of the Dual Endothelin Receptor Antagonist Aprocitentan on Body Weight and Fluid Homeostasis in Healthy Subjects on a High Sodium Diet.

Aprocitentan is a novel, oral, dual endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) in development in difficult-to-control hypertension. As fluid retention and edema are concerns with ERAs, we investigated whether aprocitentan causes weight gain in healthy subjects on a high sodium diet and explored potential mechanisms if occurring. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study enrolled 28 subjects. Three doses of aprocitentan (10, 25, or 50 mg/day for 9 days) were compared with placebo. Increases in body weight were observed with aprocitentan (placebo-corrected mean weight gains [90% confidence interval]) of 0.43 [0.05-0.80], 0.77 [0.03-1.51], and 0.83 [0.33-1.32] kg at 10 mg, 25 mg, and 50 mg, respectively. Decreases in hemoglobin and uric acid were observed. Plasma volume increased at most by 5.5% without dose-response relationship. Urinary sodium excretion decreased at 10 mg and 25 mg but not at 50 mg. Therefore, aprocitentan produced moderate weight increases in healthy subjects on high sodium diet, without obvious sodium retention.

Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Aprocitentan, a Dual Endothelin Receptor Antagonist, in Healthy Japanese and Caucasian Subjects.

Aprocitentan is an orally active dual endothelin receptor antagonist currently in development for treatment of difficult-to-control (resistant) hypertension. In phase 1 and 2 studies, aprocitentan has been characterized predominantly in Caucasian subjects. In this bridging, double-blind study, 20 healthy Japanese and Caucasian male and female subjects received 25 mg of aprocitentan or placebo once daily for 10 days and were monitored until 216 hours after the last dosing. The pharmacokinetics of aprocitentan were similar between ethnicities. At steady state, maximum plasma concentration was reached at 4 and 3 hours, and elimination half-life was 49.1 and 48.8 hours for Japanese and Caucasian subjects, respectively. The accumulation index was around 3 for both populations. Geometric means ratios for maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve during 1 dosing interval were around 1, with 90% confidence interval ranging from 0.87 to 1.30. Aprocitentan was safe and well tolerated in both groups. As no clinically relevant differences were found between Japanese and Caucasian subjects, it is unlikely that the pharmacokinetics of aprocitentan would differ significantly between Caucasian subjects and other ethnicities. Aprocitentan can therefore be administered at a dose level of up to 25 mg in any ethnicity without dose adjustment.

Rationale and design of the Medical Research Council's Precision Medicine with Zibotentan in Microvascular Angina (PRIZE) trial.

Microvascular angina is caused by cardiac small vessel disease, and dysregulation of the endothelin system is implicated. The minor G allele of the non-coding single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs9349379 enhances expression of the endothelin 1 gene in human vascular cells, increasing circulating concentrations of ET-1. The prevalence of this allele is higher in patients with ischemic heart disease. Zibotentan is a potent, selective inhibitor of the ETA receptor. We have identified zibotentan as a potential disease-modifying therapy for patients with microvascular angina. METHODS: We will assess the efficacy and safety of adjunctive treatment with oral zibotentan (10 mg daily) in patients with microvascular angina and assess whether rs9349379 (minor G allele; population prevalence ~36%) acts as a theragnostic biomarker of the response to treatment with zibotentan. The PRIZE trial is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential cross-over trial. The study population will be enriched to ensure a G-allele frequency of 50% for the rs9349379 SNP. The participants will receive a single-blind placebo run-in followed by treatment with either 10 mg of zibotentan daily for 12 weeks then placebo for 12 weeks, or vice versa, in random order. The primary outcome is treadmill exercise duration using the Bruce protocol. The primary analysis will assess the within-subject difference in exercise duration following treatment with zibotentan versus placebo. CONCLUSION: PRIZE invokes precision medicine in microvascular angina. Should our hypotheses be confirmed, this developmental trial will inform the rationale and design for undertaking a larger multicenter trial.

The endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: A cross-species comparison of its cytochrome P450 induction pattern.

The dual endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan was approved in 2013 for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Macitentan is an inducer of cytochrome P450 expression in vivo in animal species but not in man. In rat and dog, changes in P450 expression manifest as autoinduction upon repeat dosing. The induction pattern, however, significantly differed between both species, and between male and female rats. While macitentan exposure steadily declined with dose in the dog, P450 induction was saturable in the rat reaching levels of 40%-60% and 60%-80% at steady-state in male and female animals, respectively. The nature and number of P450 enzymes involved in macitentan clearance were identified as a major reason for the observed species differences. In the dog, macitentan was metabolized by a single P450 enzyme, that is, Cyp3a12, whereas several members of the Cyp2c and Cyp3a families were involved in the rat. Macitentan selectively upregulated Cyp3a expression in rat, whereas the expression of the Cyp2c enzymes involved in macitentan metabolism remained mostly unchanged, eventually leading to a higher contribution of Cyp3a upon induction. Macitentan also induced CYP3A4 expression in human hepatocytes via initial activation of the human pregnane X receptor. No such induction was evident in humans at the therapeutic macitentan dose of 10 mg as shown in a clinical drug-drug interaction study with the CYP3A4 substrate sildenafil.

The Clinical Efficacy of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Therapeutic strategies for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have made remarkable progress over the last two decades. Currently, 3 types of drugs can be used to treat PAH; prostacyclins, phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, and endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA). In Japan, the first generation ERA bosentan was reimbursed in 2005, following which the 2nd generation ERAs ambrisentan and macitentan were reimbursed in 2009 and 2015, respectively. The efficacy of each ERA on hemodynamics in PAH patients remains to be elucidated. The aims of this study were to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of ERAs and compare these effects among each generation of ERAs.We retrospectively examined the clinical parameters of 42 PAH patients who were prescribed an ERA (15 bosentan, 12 ambrisentan, and 15 macitentan) and who underwent a hemodynamic examination before and after ERA introduction at our institution from January 2007 to July 2019.In a total of 42 patients, mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were significantly decreased and cardiac index was significantly increased after ERA introduction (P < 0.001) and the World Health Organization-Functional class (WHO-Fc) was significantly improved after ERA introduction (P = 0.005). Next, in a comparison between 1st and 2nd generation ERAs, 2nd generation ERAs were found to have brought about greater improvements in hemodynamic parameters (mPAP and PVR. P < 0.01), heart rate, brain natriuretic peptide, arterial oxygen saturation, and mixed venous oxygen saturation than the 1st generation ERA bosentan.We conclude that all ERAs could successfully improve the hemodynamics of PAH patients and that the newer generation ERAs, ambrisentan and macitentan, seemed to be preferable to bosentan.

Topical application of endothelin receptor a antagonist attenuates imiquimod-induced psoriasiform skin inflammation.

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is well known as the most potent vasoconstrictor, and can evoke histamine-independent pruritus. Recently, its involvement in cutaneous inflammation has begun to draw attention. The upregulation of ET-1 expression in the epidermis of human psoriasis patients has been reported. It was also demonstrated that ET-1 can stimulate dendritic cells to induce Th17/1 immune responses. However, the role of the interaction between ET-1 and ET-1 receptors in the pathogenesis of psoriasis remains elusive. Here, we investigated the effects of ET-1 receptor antagonist on imiquimod (IMQ) -induced psoriasiform dermatitis in mouse. Psoriasis-related cytokines such as IL-17A and TNF-α induced ET-1 expression in human keratinocytes. Topical application of selective endothelin A receptor (ETAR) antagonist ambrisentan significantly attenuated the development of IMQ-induced psoriasiform dermatitis and also significantly inhibited the histological inflammation and cytokine expression (TNF-α, IL-12p40, IL-12 p19, and IL-17) in the lesional skin of the mouse model. Furthermore, topical application of ambrisentan suppressed phenotypic and functional activation of dendritic cells in lymph nodes. Our findings indicate that the ET-1 and ETAR axis plays an important role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and is a potential therapeutic target for treating psoriasis.

Effects of Multiple-Dose Administration of Aprocitentan on the Pharmacokinetics of Rosuvastatin.

Aprocitentan is an investigational, orally active, dual, endothelin receptor antagonist that targets a novel pathway in the treatment of difficult-to-control (resistant) hypertension. The drug-drug interaction potential of aprocitentan on the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) transporter substrate rosuvastatin was investigated in this single-center, open-label, single-sequence study. Twenty healthy male subjects received a single dose of 10-mg rosuvastatin on days 1 and 13 followed by pharmacokinetic and tolerability assessments for up to 120 hours. From day 5 to day 17, subjects received 25 mg of aprocitentan once daily. Seventeen of 20 enrolled subjects completed the treatment. At steady state, aprocitentan did not affect the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin in a clinically relevant way. The maximum plasma concentration was increased by 40% with a 90% confidence interval of 1.19 to 1.65. However, the ratio of the geometric means for both area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to time t and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity was close to 1 with the 90% confidence interval within a reference interval of 0.80 to 1.25. Adverse events leading to study discontinuation were reported in 2 subjects. Overall, the combination of rosuvastatin and aprocitentan was well tolerated. Based on these data, aprocitentan does not affect BCRP and can be administered concomitantly with drugs dependent on BCRP transport.

Endothelin receptor antagonists alleviate blood-brain barrier disruption and cerebral edema in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury: A comparison between bosentan and ambrisentan.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is induced by the immediate physical disruption of brain tissue. TBI causes disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and brain edema. In the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of TBI patients, endothelin-1 (ET-1) is increased, suggesting that ET-1 aggravates TBI-induced brain damage. In this study, the effect of bosentan (ETA/ETB antagonist) and ambrisentan (ETA antagonist) on BBB dysfunction and brain edema were examined in a mouse model of TBI using lateral fluid percussion injury (FPI). FPI to the mouse cerebrum increased the expression levels of ET-1 and ETB receptors. Administration of bosentan (3 or 15 mg/kg/day) and ambrisentan (0.1 or 0.5 mg/kg/day) at 6 and 24 h after FPI ameliorated BBB disruption and cerebral brain edema. Delayed administration of bosentan from 2 days after FPI also reduced BBB disruption and brain edema, while ambrisentan had no significant effects. FPI-induced expression levels of ET-1 and ETB receptors were reduced by bosentan, but not by ambrisentan. In cultured mouse astrocytes and brain microvessel endothelial cells, ET-1 (100 nM) increased prepro--ET-1 mRNA, which was inhibited by bosentan, but not by ambrisentan. FPI-induced alterations of the expression levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9, vascular endothelial growth factor-A, and angiopoietin-1 in the mouse cerebrum were reduced by delayed administration of bosentan, while ambrisentan had no significant effects. These results suggest that ET antagonists are effective in improving BBB disruption and cerebral edema in TBI patients and that an ETA/ETB non-selective type of antagonists is more effective.