Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 12.173
Filter
1.
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf ; 23(3): e13348, 2024 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720587

ABSTRACT

Listeria monocytogenes biofilms formed on food-contact surfaces within food-processing facilities pose a significant challenge, serving as persistent sources of cross-contamination. In this review, we examined documented cases of foodborne outbreaks and recalls linked to L. monocytogenes contamination on equipment surfaces and in the food production environment, provided an overview of the prevalence and persistence of L. monocytogenes in different food-processing facilities, and discussed environmental factors influencing its biofilm formation. We further delved into antimicrobial interventions, such as chemical sanitizers, thermal treatments, biological control, physical treatment, and other approaches for controlling L. monocytogenes biofilms on food-contact surfaces. This review provides valuable insights into the persistent challenge of L. monocytogenes biofilms in food processing, offering a foundation for future research and practical strategies to enhance food safety.


Subject(s)
Biofilms , Food Microbiology , Listeria monocytogenes , Listeria monocytogenes/physiology , Biofilms/growth & development , Food Handling/methods , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control
2.
J Emerg Med ; 66(4): e477-e482, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38433037

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medical equipment can become scarce in disaster scenarios. Prior work has reported that four sheep could be ventilated together on a single ventilator. Others found that this maneuver is possible when needed, but no one has yet investigated whether cross-contamination occurs in co-ventilated individuals. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to investigate whether an infection could spread between co-ventilated individuals. METHODS: Four 2-L anesthesia bags were connected to a sterilized ventilator circuit that used heat and moisture exchange filters and bacterial and viral filters, as would be expected in this dire scenario. Serratia marcescens was inoculated into "lung" no. 1. After running for 24 h, each lung and three additional points in the circuit were cultured to see whether S. marcescens had spread. These cultures were examined at 24 and 48 h to assess for cross-contamination. This entire procedure was performed three times. RESULTS: S. marcescens was not found in lung no. 2, 3, or 4 or the three additional sites on the expiratory limb at 24 and 48 h in all three trials. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-contamination does not occur within 24 h using the described ventilator circuit configuration.


Subject(s)
Equipment Contamination , Ventilators, Mechanical , Humans , Bacteria , Filtration , Lung , Respiration, Artificial
3.
J Hosp Infect ; 147: 56-62, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38447805

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Duodenoscope-associated infections (DAIs) are exogenous infections resulting from the use of contaminated duodenoscopes. Though numerous outbreaks of DAI have involved multidrug-resistant micro-organisms (MDROs), outbreaks involving non-MDROs are also likely to occur. Detection challenges arise as these infections often resolve before culture or because causative strains are not retained for comparison with duodenoscope strains. AIM: To identify and analyse DAIs spanning a seven-year period in a tertiary care medical centre. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study. Duodenoscope cultures positive for gastrointestinal flora between March 2015 and September 2022 were paired with duodenoscope usage data to identify patients exposed to contaminated duodenoscopes. Analysis encompassed patients treated after a positive duodenoscope culture and those treated within the interval from a negative to a positive culture. Patient identification numbers were cross-referenced with a clinical culture database to identify patients developing infections with matching micro-organisms within one year of their procedure. A 'pair' was established upon a species-level match between duodenoscope and patient cultures. Pairs were further analysed via antibiogram comparison, and by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to determine genetic relatedness. FINDINGS: Sixty-eight pairs were identified; of these, 21 exhibited matching antibiograms which underwent WGS, uncovering two genetically closely related pairs categorized as DAIs. Infection onset occurred up to two months post procedure. Both causative agents were non-MDROs. CONCLUSION: This study provides crucial insights into DAIs caused by non-MDROs and it highlights the challenge of DAI recognition in daily practice. Importantly, the delayed manifestation of the described DAIs suggests a current underestimation of DAI risk.


Subject(s)
Duodenoscopes , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Duodenoscopes/microbiology , Duodenoscopes/adverse effects , Tertiary Care Centers , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Male , Female , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/genetics , Equipment Contamination
4.
Ultrasound Med Biol ; 50(6): 775-778, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38485533

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of infection prevention and control measures for all medical procedures, including ultrasound examinations. As the use of ultrasound increases across more medical modalities, including point-of-care ultrasound, so does the risk of possible transmission from equipment to patients and patients to patients. This is particularly relevant for endocavity transducers, such as trans-vaginal, trans-rectal and trans-oesophageal, which could be contaminated with organisms from blood, mucosal, genital or rectal secretions. This article proports to update the WFUMB 2017 guidelines which focussed on the cleaning and disinfection of trans-vaginal ultrasound transducers between patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disinfection , Equipment Contamination , Transducers , Ultrasonography , Humans , Ultrasonography/methods , Ultrasonography/instrumentation , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/prevention & control , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Disinfection/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Point-of-Care Systems
5.
J Hosp Infect ; 143: 1-7, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38529779

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Using robots to handle medical devices in the decontamination area of the Central Sterile Supply Department (CSSD) can reduce risks and address staff shortages. The gripper design must allow reliable cleaning using standard CSSD procedures to avoid build-up of biofilms and possible cross-contamination between different instrument trays and the gripper's functionality. This study explores the design of the robot's gripper regarding cleanability, aiming to determine whether successful cleaning can be achieved even after prolonged drying for a working shift of 8 h. METHODS: We optimized a gripper for cleanability and used it to assess the spread of different test soils depending on different forms of motion. Subsequently, we analysed the cleanability using sheep's blood as test soil, reprocessing the gripper in different assembly configurations after 4 and 8 h of drying, and measuring residual protein. FINDINGS: Based on our investigations, we documented the spread of contamination depending on the type of motion of the gripper's components. Sheep's blood exhibited the highest dispersion among the test soils, permeating through thin crevices. Importantly, all samples displayed residual protein levels below the warning threshold, irrespective of drying time and gripper disassembly or cleaning position. Cleaning in a device-specific optimized position achieved results comparable to cleaning the disassembled individual components. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that cleaning even after one working shift of 8 h and without the labour-intensive disassembly of the gripper is feasible, supporting the future use of robots to handle contaminated medical devices in the CSSD decontamination area.


Subject(s)
Robotics , Humans , Decontamination/methods , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Surgical Instruments , Soil
6.
Int J Prosthodont ; 37(1): 109, 2024 02 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38381989

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine and compare the frequency of contamination on different sites of healing abutments (HAs) after sterilization with Phloxine B dye on unused and used HAs after sterilization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 HAs were divided into two test groups: (1) used and sterilized and (2) a control group (unused). The test group was evaluated for contamination after sterilization; the control group did not undergo any procedure. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 (IBM). Descriptive statistics were used to determine the frequency of contamination in the different groups and at the different HA sites. Chi-square test was used to evaluate the association of frequency of contamination with the HA site and design. The level of significance was kept at P ≤ .01. RESULTS: The test group showed more contamination compared to the control group. The most contaminated sites were the screw thread and the screwdriver engagement location. CONCLUSIONS: HA reuse is cost-effective, but cleaning and sterilization was not effective for these components; thus, HAs need to be reused with caution because they were heavily contaminated when compared to new HAs. Among the different sites, the screw thread and screwdriver engagement sites were more prone to contamination. HA type did not influence the frequency of contamination.


Subject(s)
Dental Abutments , Dental Implants , Surface Properties , Equipment Reuse , Sterilization/methods , Equipment Contamination
7.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 45(6): 790-792, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38374787

ABSTRACT

A quaternary ammonium and alcohol-based disinfectant with reported continuous activity demonstrated reduced microbial buildup on surfaces over time compared to routine disinfectants without continuous activity in in vitro and hospital studies. We compared these disinfectants in ambulatory settings and found no difference in bioburden on high-touch surfaces over time.


Subject(s)
Disinfectants , Disinfection , Quaternary Ammonium Compounds , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Disinfection/methods , Humans , Quaternary Ammonium Compounds/pharmacology , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Colony Count, Microbial , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Touch , Ambulatory Care
9.
Am J Infect Control ; 52(6): 635-643, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38408542

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Outbreaks linked to inadequate endoscope drying have infected numerous patients, and current standards and guidelines recommend at least 10 minutes of forced air for drying channels. This study evaluated a new forced-air drying system (FADS) for endoscopes. METHODS: Drying was assessed using droplet detection cards; visual inspection of air/water connectors, suction connectors, and distal ends; and borescope examinations of endoscope interiors. Assessments were performed after automated endoscope reprocessor (AER) alcohol flush and air purge cycles and after 10-minute FADS cycles. RESULTS: Researchers evaluated drying during encounters with 22 gastroscopes and 20 colonoscopes. After default AER alcohol and air purge cycles, 100% (42/42) of endoscopes were still wet. Substantial fluid emerged from distal ends during the first 15 seconds of the FADS cycle, and droplets also emerged from air/water and suction connectors. Following FADS cycle completion, 100% (42/42) were dry, with no retained fluid detected by any of the assessment methods. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple endoscope ports and channels remained wet after AER cycles intended to aid in drying but were dry after the FADS cycle. This study reinforced the need to evaluate the effectiveness of current drying practices and illustrated the use of practical tools in a real-world setting.


Subject(s)
Endoscopes , Humans , Endoscopes/microbiology , Desiccation/methods , Disinfection/methods , Disinfection/standards , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control
10.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 14: 1303099, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38299116

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The contamination of dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) poses a significant risk of cross-infection in dentistry. Although chemical disinfectants have been effective in reducing number of bacteria, they do have limitations. Methods: This study aimed to investigate the potential of chlorogenic acid, a natural substance with broadspectrum antibacterial properties, for treating DUWLs. Over a period of three months, we analyzed the microbial communities in 149 DUWLs samples collected from 5 dental units using high-throughput pyrophosphate sequencing. Results: The results revealed that chlorogenic acid treatment had a significant impact on the microbial community profile in the DUWLs, with the most significant changes occurring within the first 15 days and stabilization observed in the last 30 days. The predominant genera detected in the samples were Bacteroides, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Methylobacterium, and Phreatobacter. Additionally, the relative abundance of certain beneficial bacteria, such as Alloprevotella, Roseburia, and Blautia, increased, while the presence of opportunistic pathogens like Mycobacteria significantly decreased. The functional prediction analysis using the KEGG database indicated a decrease in the pathogenicity of the bacterial community in the DUWLs following chlorogenic acid treatment. Discussion: This study introduces a novel approach for the prevention and treatment of infections associated with dental care.


Subject(s)
Chlorogenic Acid , Equipment Contamination , Chlorogenic Acid/pharmacology , Colony Count, Microbial , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Water Microbiology , Bacteria , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Biofilms
11.
Biomed Instrum Technol ; 58(1): 25-33, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38377297

ABSTRACT

Objective: Borescope examinations of endoscope channels are commonly described in literature, but no studies on surgical instrument lumen inspection have been published recently. Inadequately processed surgical instruments have been implicated in patient infections. This study assessed the utility of borescopes for inspecting surgical instruments. Methods: The study team inspected and photographed sterilized, patient-ready arthroscopic shaver handpieces and suction tips using a tablet camera and borescopes to characterize internal anatomy, defects found in lumens, and the impact of recleaning on debris or residues. Results: Ten suctions and eight shavers were inspected. All suctions had internal ridges and suction holes that were perpendicular to the lumen. All shavers had visible ridges, elbows, and lever mechanisms inside lumens. Of the 18 instruments, 16 (88%) had internal features that appeared rough or jagged and 17 (94%) had visible debris or discoloration in the lumens. Recleaning efforts generally were effective for suctions, but multiple rounds of recleaning with enhanced steps were less effective for shavers, which were replaced. Researchers documented retained soil and brush bristles in several new shavers despite following manufacturer instructions for cleaning and found visible damage and discoloration within five uses. Discussion: This study demonstrated the value of borescope examinations for surgical instrument lumens. Visual inspections identified anatomical features that could influence cleaning effectiveness and detected residual soil, discoloration, and debris in most instruments. The findings suggested that manufacturer cleaning instructions were insufficient and additional cleaning was not always effective. In response, the site's multidisciplinary team strengthened risk assessment protocols and enhanced their cleaning practices.


Subject(s)
Disinfection , Endoscopes , Humans , Pilot Projects , Surgical Instruments , Soil , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control
12.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(6): 605-611, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38290053

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bacterial contamination of implants has been linked to biofilm formation and subsequent infection, capsular contracture, and breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Reducing contamination during implant insertion should therefore reduce biofilm formation disease sequelae. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare levels of contamination between preventative techniques. METHODS: A model to simulate the passage of implants through a skin incision was designed that utilized a sterile textured polyvinyl plastic sheet contaminated with Staphylococcus epidermidis. In the first stage of the polyvinyl contamination model, implants were subject to infection-mitigation techniques and passed through the incision, then placed onto horse blood agar plates and incubated for 24 hours. In the second stage of the study the same contamination was applied to human abdominal wall specimens. A 5 cm incision was made through skin and fat, then implants were passed through and levels of contamination were measured as described. RESULTS: Smooth implants grew a mean of 95 colony-forming units (CFUs; approximately 1 CFU/cm2) and textured implants grew 86 CFUs (also approximately 1 CFU/cm2). CFU counts were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U-test which showed no significant difference between implant types (P < .05); independent-sample t-tests showed a significant difference. The dependent-variable techniques were then compared as groups by one-way analysis of variance, which also showed a significant reduction compared with the control group (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: This in vitro study has shown the effectiveness of antiseptic rinse and skin/implant barrier techniques for reducing bacterial contamination of breast implants at the time of insertion.


Subject(s)
Biofilms , Breast Implantation , Breast Implants , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Staphylococcus epidermidis , Breast Implants/microbiology , Breast Implants/adverse effects , Humans , Staphylococcus epidermidis/isolation & purification , Breast Implantation/adverse effects , Breast Implantation/instrumentation , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Female , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Colony Count, Microbial
13.
J Hosp Infect ; 145: 142-147, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38272124

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A recent study confirmed significant contamination of syringe tips following routine anaesthesia practice of at least 6 h in duration. AIM: We assessed the relative efficacy of clinically relevant syringe tip disinfection techniques following contamination with the hyper transmissible and more pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 5 (S. aureus ST5) strain characteristic associated with increased strength of biofilm formation and greater desiccation tolerance. METHODS: Syringe tips (N=40) contaminated with S. aureus ST5 were randomized to 70% isopropyl pads with 10 or 60 s of drying time, scrubbing alcohol disinfection caps with 10 or 60 s of dwell time, or to non-scrubbing alcohol disinfection caps with 60 s of dwell time. The primary outcome was residual 24-h colony forming units (cfu) >10. RESULTS: Scrubbing disinfection caps were more effective than alcohol pads (25% (12/48) <10 cfu for scrubbing caps (10- or 60-s dwell times) vs 0% (0/48) <10 cfu for alcohol pads (10 or 60 s of drying time), Holm-Sidak adjusted P=0.0016). Scrubbing disinfection caps were more effective than non-scrubbing alcohol disinfection caps (25% (12/48) <10 cfu for scrubbing alcohol caps (10- or 60-s dwell times) vs 2% (1/48) for non-scrubbing alcohol caps (60-s dwell time), adjusted P=0.0087). CONCLUSIONS: Scrubbing alcohol caps are more effective than alcohol pads or non-scrubbing disinfecting caps for microbial reduction of syringe tips contaminated with the more pathogenic S. aureus ST5.


Subject(s)
Disinfection , Staphylococcus , Humans , Disinfection/methods , Staphylococcus aureus , Syringes , Ethanol , Equipment Contamination
14.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 45(5): 576-582, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38213184

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Needleless connectors (NCs) can be disinfected using antiseptic barrier caps (ABCs) to reduce the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections. However, recent evidence suggests that isopropanol can leak from the ABC into the NC, posing concern about their safe use. We sought to determine in vitro which ABC and NC parameters influence the leakage of isopropanol through the infusion circuit. METHODS: We assessed 13 NCs and 4 ABCs available in the European market. In vitro circuits consisting of an isopropanol cap, a NC, and an 11-cm catheter line were created. The circuits were left in place for 1 to 7 days at room temperature to assess the kinetics of isopropanol leakage. Isopropanol content in ABC and in circuit flushing solutions (5 mL NaCl 0.9%) after exposure to the cap were measured using gas chromatography with a flame ionization detector. RESULTS: The leakage of isopropanol from the cap to the NC was dependent on the NC, but not the cap. The NC mechanism did not predict the leakage of isopropanol. The Q-Syte NC exhibited the most isopropanol leakage (7.01±1.03 mg and 28.32±2.62 mg at 24 hours and 7 days, respectively), whereas the Caresite NC had the lowest isopropanol leakage at 7 days (1.69±0.01 mg). CONCLUSION: The use of isopropanol ABCs can cause isopropanol leakage into the catheter circuit according to NC parameters. Caution should be exercised when using these devices, especially in the pediatric and neonatal population.


Subject(s)
2-Propanol , Anti-Infective Agents, Local , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Child , Catheters, Indwelling , Equipment Contamination
15.
J Perioper Pract ; 34(1-2): 47-56, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36635896

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To identify all published data on the chemical, micro-organism and malignant cell contents of ultrasonic scalpel plume, if any, and on any clinical implications of the contents on patients and operating staff. METHODS: Searches were conducted aiming to identify all published evidence on the chemical constituents, presence/absence of viable micro-organisms and malignant cells in ultrasonic scalpel plume. Attempts were made to source unpublished industry data. RESULTS: There is evidence from human and in vitro studies of the presence of a range of harmful, and some human carcinogenic, chemicals within ultrasonic plume, mostly at very low concentrations. Any clinical relevance of this has not been studied. There is evidence from experimental studies of the presence of hepatitis virus, human coronavirus and human papillomavirus material within ultrasonic plume. Any clinical effect of this has not been studied. There is conflicting evidence from combined in vitro and mouse model studies of the presence of viable malignant cells within ultrasonic plume. Any clinical relevance of this has also not been studied. CONCLUSION: Overall, relatively little research into the plume has been published, and further study is required to more clearly delineate any potential risk to patients, surgeons and other theatre staff. Current safety recommendations are discussed.


Subject(s)
Equipment Contamination , Ultrasonics , Animals , Humans , Mice
16.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 30(1): 9-14, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36916178

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Antineoplastic drugs (ADs) are commonly used pharmaceuticals for anticancer treatments. It has previously been shown that the external surface of drug vials frequently is contaminated with ADs. More than a decade ago methods to prevent occupational exposure were introduced by using plastic coverage of the glass vials or packing vials in a secondary plastic container. The aim of the pilot study was to determine contamination levels of ADs on different parts of AD packaging of two different commercially available drug vials on the Swedish market and to investigate the occurrence of cross contamination of ADs. METHODS: Packagings of gemcitabine (GEM) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) were tested by wipe sampling. Five ADs; GEM, 5-FU, cyclophosphamide (CP), ifosfamide and etoposide were quantified using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. RESULTS: AD contaminations were detected in 69% and 60% of the GEM and 5-FU packaging samples. Highest levels, up to approximately 5 µg/sample, were observed on the glass vials. The protective shrink-wrap of 5-FU vials and the plastic container of GEM were contaminated with low levels of 5-FU and GEM, respectively, and furthermore the 5-FU vials with shrink-wrap were cross-contaminated with GEM. Cross-contamination of CP and GEM was detected on 5-FU vials with plastic shrink-wrap removed. CONCLUSIONS: External contamination of ADs are still present at primary drug packagings on the Swedish market. Protection of AD vials by plastic shrink-wrap or a secondary plastic container does not remove the external contamination levels completely. The presence of cross contamination of ADs on drug packagings was also observed.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Gemcitabine , Fluorouracil/analysis , Pilot Projects , Drug Packaging , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Antineoplastic Agents/analysis , Cyclophosphamide/analysis , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Drug Contamination/prevention & control
17.
Am J Infect Control ; 52(2): 176-182, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37598902

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A significant reduction in bacterial growth on stethoscope membranes has been noticed after performing daily disinfection. Nevertheless, disinfection is rarely performed. We aimed to assess self-reported stethoscope disinfection practices among medical doctors, detect bacterial contamination on personal stethoscopes, and estimate the effectiveness of 70% ethanol as a stethoscope disinfecting agent. METHODS: To determine stethoscope disinfection practices, participants filled out a questionnaire (N = 47), followed by providing stethoscopes for bacterial analysis. Differences in bacterial contamination were observed through the self-reported frequency and method of stethoscope disinfection. The effect of disinfecting with 70% ethanol was evaluated by comparing the presence of bacterial growth before and after disinfection. RESULTS: The presence of bacterial growth was found in 78.7% of the stethoscope samples, with the median (interquartile range) number of colony-forming units at 25 (10-105). The frequency of disinfection greatly impacted the number of colony-forming units, and the method affected the presence of bacterial growth. Disinfection of stethoscope membranes using 70% ethanol resulted in a compelling 97.3% reduction of bacterial growth. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate stethoscope disinfection is highly efficient in reducing bacterial contamination and as such should be considered a critical step in hygienic practices.


Subject(s)
Disinfection , Stethoscopes , Humans , Disinfection/methods , Stethoscopes/microbiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Serbia , Bacteria , 2-Propanol , Hospitals , Ethanol , Emergency Service, Hospital , Equipment Contamination
18.
Endoscopy ; 56(3): 198-204, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37848074

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current duodenoscope reprocessing protocols are insufficient to prevent contamination and require adaptations to prevent endoscopy-associated infections (EAIs). This study aimed to investigate the effect of a new endoscope cleaning brush on the contamination rate of ready-to-use duodenoscopes. METHODS: This retrospective before-and-after intervention study collected duodenoscope surveillance culture results from March 2018 to June 2022. Contamination was defined as ≥1 colony-forming unit of a microorganism of gut or oral origin (MGO). In December 2020, an endoscope cleaning brush with a sweeper design was introduced as an intervention in the manual cleaning of duodenoscopes. A logistic mixed-effects model was used to study the effects of this intervention. RESULTS: Data were collected from 176 culture sets before the new brush's introduction and 81 culture sets afterwards. Pre-introduction, culture sets positive with an MGO comprised 45.5% (95%CI 38.3%-52.8%; 80/176), decreasing to 17.3% (95%CI 10.6%-26.9%; 14/81) after implementation of the new brush. Compared with the former brush, duodenoscopes cleaned with the new brush had lower odds of contamination with MGOs (adjusted odds ratio 0.25, 95%CI 0.11-0.58; P=0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Use of the new brush in manual cleaning reduced contamination with MGOs and is expected to prevent EAIs. These findings should be confirmed in future prospective randomized studies.


Subject(s)
Duodenoscopes , Magnesium Oxide , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Disinfection/methods , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
19.
Asian J Endosc Surg ; 17(1): e13245, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37724691

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: As well as preventing nosocomial and healthcare-associated infections, a reliable and eco-friendly washer for medical equipment would also be safe for the global environment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a newly developed automatic washing system (Nano-washer) that uses electrolyzed water and ultrasonication without detergent for washing endoscopes. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic lobectomy or laparoscopic colectomy at Nagasaki University between 2018 and 2022 were included. A total of 60 cases of endoscope use were collected and classified according to endoscope washing method into the Nano-washer group (using no detergent) (n = 40) and the manual washing group (n = 20). Protein and bacterial residues were measured before and after washing, using absorbance spectrometry and 16S rRNA polymerase chain reaction. The effectiveness of protein and bacterial removal and endoscope surface damage after washing were compared under specular vision between the groups. RESULTS: Nano-washer did not use detergent unlike manual washing. There was no difference in demographic or clinical characteristics between the groups except for the presence of comorbidities in the lobectomy group (Nano-washer, 85%; manual washing, 40%, P = .031). Compared with the manual washing group, residual protein levels in the Nano-washer group were significantly reduced after washing (lobectomy, 0.956 mg/mL vs 0.016 mg/mL, P < .001; colectomy, 0.144 mg/mL vs 0.002 mg/mL, P = .008). Nano-washer group showed a significant reduction in bacteria between before and after lobectomy (9437 copies/cm2 vs 4612 copies/cm2 , P = .024). CONCLUSION: Nano-washer is a promising, effective, and eco-friendly automatic washing device that is safer and more efficient than manual washing.


Subject(s)
Detergents , Disinfection , Humans , Disinfection/methods , Feasibility Studies , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Endoscopes/microbiology
20.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 45(1): 100-102, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37534438

ABSTRACT

Initial specimen diversion devices (ISDDs) are a potential solution for reducing blood-culture contamination rates. We report the implementation of an ISDD associated with a sustained reduction in blood-culture contamination rates for >18 months after implementation. We did not observe a clinically significant reduction in inpatient vancomycin usage.


Subject(s)
Blood Culture , Vancomycin , Humans , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Blood Specimen Collection
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...