Ertapenem-induced encephalopathy in a patient with liver abscess and acute kidney injury.

A man in his late 70s, retired and independent, generally fit and well with a history of normal cognitive function baseline presented with liver abscess and acute kidney injury. He received meropenem 1 g three times a day for 15 days then subsequently changed to ertapenem 1 g one time a day in preparation for outpatient antibiotic treatment. After 2 days of starting ertapenem, the patient developed night-time delirium, decreased orientation and insomnia, loss of appetite, jerking and hallucination. Investigations have been done to investigate the cause of acute delirium, including lumbar puncture, CT brain, MRI brain, repeat CT abdomen and pelvis to monitor the liver abscess, and electroencephalogram but results were all unremarkable. Medication history during admission was reviewed and discontinued one by one the medications that were suspected to have caused the encephalopathy. Two days following the discontinuation of ertapenem, the patient's symptoms improved with a rapid return to his baseline and without neurological deficit.

Ertapenem blood concentration: A retrospective cohort study to analyse risk of neurotoxicity.

AIMS: Several cases of ertapenem-related neurotoxicity have been published in the current literature. However, studies evaluating the ertapenem blood concentration (EBC) as a risk of these adverse events are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between the trough EBC and the risk of neurological toxicity. METHODS: This was a retrospective study, including patients who underwent ertapenem treatment between October 2019 and February 2021. We excluded patients in the critical care unit and those whose blood samples were not properly taken in order to analyse ertapenem trough concentration. We also excluded patients whose clinical follow-up was not properly realized for the entire period of ertapenem treatment. The main outcome was the presence of any suspicious neurological side effect owing to ertapenem administration and its relationship with the plasma concentration. Secondary outcomes were to identify clinical and analytical data contributing to a higher risk of neurotoxicity. RESULTS: The initial cohort comprised 158 individuals. For the final analysis we evaluated 102 patients, reporting a neurological alteration in 13/102 (12.7%). Mean trough EBC was significantly higher in patients showing neurotoxicity in comparison with those who did not (37.8 mcg mL-1 , standard deviation [SD] ± 35.7 vs. 14.6 mcg mL-1 , SD ± 15.2; P = .002). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, EBC (odds ratio [OR] = 1.07; P = .006), a moderate renal insufficiency (OR = 9.2; P = .02) and a history of previous neurologic disease (OR = 9.9; P = .02) were identified as risk factors of neurological alteration during ertapenem treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients at risk, determining the ertapenem plasma concentration may help to minimize the risk of neurotoxicity.

Safety of Intravenous Push Ertapenem Compared to Intravenous Piggyback at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center.

Background: Recent shortages of intravenous (IV) fluids have resulted in healthcare systems converting administration of many medications from IV piggyback (IVPB) to IV push (IVP). Administering medications via IVP presents numerous advantages; however, IV site reactions such as phlebitis and infiltration may occur. Objective: The objective of this analysis is to evaluate the infusion site safety of ertapenem given as peripheral IVP compared to IVPB in adult patients. Methods: This was an institutional review board-approved, single-center, retrospective study. Patients, ages 18 or older, receiving IV ertapenem were identified. The major endpoints analyzed were IV site reactions including phlebitis and infiltration. The Naranjo Nomogram was utilized to assess the causality of the reactions to determine the likelihood of whether the event was caused by the medication itself or other factors. Results: To date, 283 administrations (92 patients) in the IVP group and 319 administrations (82 patients) in the IVPB group were analyzed. There were 13 IV site reactions compared to 8 in the IVP vs IVPB group, respectively (P-value = 0.16). Ten of the events in the IVP group were deemed "possible" and 2 deemed "doubtful," while the remaining event was considered "probable" per the Naranjo Nomogram. Of the events in the IVPB group, all 8 were found to be "possible." Conclusion: The administration of IVP ertapenem showed comparable rates of infusion site reactions compared to IVPB. Implementation of IVP ertapenem appears to be associated with infusion site safety similar to IVPB and should be considered safe to administer.

Ertapenem-induced neurotoxicity in an end-stage renal disease patient on intermittent haemodialysis: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-induced neurotoxicity is an unusual side effect, with seizure being the most commonly reported symptom. Among the carbapenems, imipenem-cilastin is classically associated with the most severe neurotoxicity side effects. Carbapenem is mainly excreted by the kidney and its half-life is significantly increased in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Therefore, dose adjustment is necessary in such patients. Ertapenem-associated neurotoxicity is increasingly being reported in CKD patients, but rarely seen in patients with recommended dose adjustment. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 56-year-old male patient with chronic kidney disease 5 on dialysis(CKD 5D). The patient presented with a history of fever, chills and rigours during a session of haemodialysis (HD). He was diagnosed with Enterobacter cloacae catheter-related blood stream infection and was started on ertapenem. After 13 days of ertapenem, he experienced an acute confusional state and progressed to having auditory and visual hallucinations. His blood investigations and imaging results revealed no other alternative diagnosis. Hence a diagnosis of ertapenem-induced neurotoxicity was made. He had complete resolution of symptoms after 10 days' discontinuation of ertapenem. CONCLUSION: Our case draws attention to the risk of potentially serious toxicity of the central nervous system in HD patients who receive the current recommended dose of ertapenem. It also highlights that renal dosing in CKD 5D patients' needs to be clinically studied to ensure antibiotic safety.

Oral Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection.

BACKGROUND: There is a need for oral antibiotic agents that are effective against multidrug-resistant gram-negative uropathogens. Tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide is an orally bioavailable carbapenem with activity against uropathogenic Enterobacterales, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing and fluoroquinolone-resistant strains. METHODS: In this phase 3, international, double-blind, double-dummy trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of orally administered tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide as compared with intravenous ertapenem in patients with complicated urinary tract infection or acute pyelonephritis. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive oral tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (at a dose of 600 mg every 8 hours) or intravenous ertapenem (at a dose of 1 g every 24 hours) for 7 to 10 days (or up to 14 days in patients with bacteremia). The primary efficacy end point was overall response (a composite of clinical cure and favorable microbiologic response) at a test-of-cure visit (on day 19, within a ±2-day window) in the microbiologic intention-to-treat population. The noninferiority margin was 12.5%. RESULTS: A total of 1372 hospitalized adult patients were enrolled; 868 patients (63.3%) were included in the microbiologic intention-to-treat population (50.8% of whom had complicated urinary tract infections and 49.2% of whom had pyelonephritis). An overall response was seen in 264 of 449 patients (58.8%) who received tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide, as compared with 258 of 419 patients (61.6%) who received ertapenem (weighted difference, -3.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9.7 to 3.2). Clinical cure at the test-of-cure visit was observed in 93.1% of the patients in the microbiologic intention-to-treat population who received tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide and 93.6% of patients who received ertapenem (weighted difference, -0.6 percentage point; 95% CI, -4.0 to 2.8); the majority of patients with microbiologic response failures at the test-of-cure visit were asymptomatic patients with recurrent bacteriuria. Secondary and subgroup analyses were supportive of the primary analysis. Adverse events were observed in 25.7% of patients who received tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide and in 25.6% of patients who received ertapenem; the most common adverse events were mild diarrhea and headache. CONCLUSIONS: Oral tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide was noninferior to intravenous ertapenem in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection and acute pyelonephritis and had a similar safety profile. (Funded by Spero Therapeutics and the Department of Health and Human Services; ADAPT-PO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03788967.).

Probable ertapenem-induced encephalopathy; case report and suggested alternatives for chronic prostatitis.

Ertapenem is a carbapenem antibiotic usually reserved for complicated infections. Drug-induced neurotoxicity is a rare adverse reaction associated with ertapenem, and may be directly related to its chemical structure. We report a case of a 64-year-old male with a hematological history and chronic prostatitis that was admitted to hospital for gait instability, clumsiness, dysarthria and tremors. He started ertapenem intravenous 1 g once daily a week prior to admission. Creatinine clearance calculation by the Cockcroft-Gault method was 52 mL/min and total protein levels were low. Ertapenem's administration was discontinued and the patient's neurological symptoms improved dramatically just one day after. The result of the Naranjo Scale was six, suggesting a probable adverse drug reaction. We discussed if he could receive meropenem in case of severe infection such as septic shock. Considering the patient's medical history, the chemical structure of meropenem and the fact that there are almost no reported cases of neurotoxicity from this drug, we assume that meropenem could be used in case of severe infection in patients with history of neurotoxicity caused by ertapenem if no added risk factors are present, such as renal failure.

Ertapenem neurotoxicity in liver transplantation.

Carbapenems are antibiotics of the cephalosporin family with a good penetrance into the central nervous system. Neurotoxicity is a rare adverse effect, most often associated with imipenem (0.4-10 %) and unusual with ertapenem. It usually presents as seizures, although encephalopathy or hallucinations may develop. However, a recent large study (n = 544) found neurotoxicity associated to the use of ertapenem with an incidence of 4.6 %. There were associated factors such as advanced age or renal dysfunction (ertapenem has a renal metabolism level of 80 %).

Ertapenem Neurotoxicity in Hemodialysis Patients-Safe and Effective Dosing Is Still Needed: A Retrospective Study and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: The approved dosing of ertapenem in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 utilizing dialysis (CKD-5D) is 0.5 g intravenous daily. Several reports associated this dosing strategy with neurotoxicity. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to identify the incidence of neurotoxicity in this population and the risk factors associated with this toxicity. The secondary objective was to review the literature and discuss a safer/cost-effective dosing strategy based on available data. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted screening all patients who received ertapenem and hemodialysis at our quaternary hospital between May 2015 and March 2019. Patients' demographics, comorbidities, concomitant drugs (known to induce neurotoxicity), and seizure history were collected. RESULTS: A total of 99 eligible patients were identified; 10 of them (10%) developed neurotoxicity. The patients who developed neurotoxicity were all male; mean age was 74 ± 9 years as compared with 68.9 ± 13 years in the sample. Bivariate relationships between all predictors and the seizures (dichotomously coded) were estimated to investigate the risk factors. The following were the significant predictors of seizures: male sex (17%; P = 0.014), dementia (27%; P = 0.012), and concomitant use of ß-lactams, aminoglycosides, or fluoroquinolones (19.6%; P = 0.042). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The currently approved ertapenem dose imposes a risk of developing neurotoxicity in patients with CKD-5D. Utilizing the published data in this population, alternative post-dialysis dosing strategies administered through dialysis access such as 1 g loading dose, followed by either 0.5 g (for the 48 hours interdialytic time) or 1 g (for the 72 hours interdialytic time) might warrant further investigation for efficacy and safety.

Ertapenem-induced encephalopathy.

Neurotoxicity is an unusual side effect of carbapenems, and it has been reported most commonly presenting as seizures, encephalopathy and hallucinations. Ertapenem neurotoxicity most classically presents as seizures in patients with end-stage renal disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m2). We present a patient with a baseline eGFR of 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2 with acute kidney injury who developed non-seizure neurotoxicity after ertapenem exposure. This patient is a middle-aged Caucasian man who received intravenous ertapenem for treatment of empyema. Although the empyema improved, he developed delirium beginning on day 7 of ertapenem. The delirium progressed to constant agitation and visual hallucinations requiring transfer to the intensive care unit with eventual intubation for airway protection. No improvement in mental status was observed with cessation of other medications. Ertapenem was discontinued and within 24 hours, he was extubated, and his mental status returned to baseline. He was discharged from the hospital the following day. The timely resolution after ertapenem discontinuation makes ertapenem-induced encephalopathy the most likely explanation for this patient's course.

Higher rates of carbapenem-related seizures in older hospitalised adults.

Clinical experience suggests higher occurrence of carbapenem-associated seizures in the elderly than what is reported in the available literature (range between 0.2% and 0.7%). An audit of 1345 patients with age 60 years or older, who received imipenem, ertapenem or meropenem during their acute hospitalisation found 32 (2.4%) subjects developed seizures. Subjects with more than one central nervous system disorders were 11.6 times more likely to develop seizures (odds ratio 11.61, P < 0.001) and subjects with prior history of seizures is associated with four times greater risks (odds ratio 4.02, P = 0.005). Physicians should exercise caution when prescribing carbapenems in elderly, especially those with known epilepsy and a high number of intracranial pathologies.

Ertapenem Monotherapy versus Gentamicin Plus Metronidazole for Perforated Appendicitis in Pediatric Patients.

Background: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ertapenem versus a combination of gentamicin plus metronidazole in pediatric patients with diffuse peritonitis attributable to perforated appendicitis. Methods: From January 2017 to January 2019, 80 pediatric patients with a median age of 13 years who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy because of perforated appendicitis with diffuse peritonitis were enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups of 40 patients each to receive ertapenem or combination therapy. The groups were compared regarding demographic/clinical data and outcomes of treatment. The main outcome measures were duration of hospitalization, time to achieving an afebrile state, post-operative complications, antibiotic treatment failure, and time to the start of enteral feeding. Results: The median length of the hospital stay was 5 and 8 days in the ertapenem and combination therapy groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). Patients in the ertapenem group took two days less to become afebrile (p < 0.0001). No post-operative complications were recorded in the ertapenem group, whereas in the combination therapy group, three complications were noted, but this difference was not significant (p = 0.2392). Furthermore, all patients in the ertapenem group responded to therapy, whereas in the combination therapy group, two antibiotic treatment failures were recorded, a diffrence that again was not significant (p = 0.4739). There was no difference in the time to the start of enteral feeding in the two groups. Conclusion: Both ertapenem and gentamicin plus metronidazole are safe and effective therapeutic options for the treatment of diffuse peritonitis in pediatric patients. Treatment with ertapenem results in lower complication rates, a shorter time to an afebrile state, and a shorter hospital stay.

Effectiveness and safety of ertapenem used in hospital-at-home units: data from Spanish Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Registry.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ertapenem in patients hospitalized at home. PATIENTS & METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data from Spanish Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) registry. RESULTS: Data from 1428 patients (median age 70 years; 5.4% institutionalized) and 1547 infectious processes (24% self-administration) were analyzed. Clinical cure or improvement was achieved in 93.8% of cases. Rate of related readmissions was 4.2%, of clinically important complications -3.9%, and of adverse drug reactions -3.2%. High comorbidity burden, contagion in nursing home and certain types of infection were associated with worse prognosis. Self-administration was effective and safe, except in case of nursing home-acquired infections. CONCLUSION: Ertapenem OPAT was effective and safe. Caregivers in nursing homes should be better trained in OPAT-related procedures.

Ertapenem-associated neurotoxicity in the spinal cord injury (SCI) population: A case series.

Context Ertapenem, a broad spectrum carbapenem antibiotic, is used often in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) patients due to increased risk factors for multi-drug resistant (MDR) infections in this population. Neurotoxicity, specifically seizures, due to ertapenem is a known adverse effect and has been described previously. Other manifestations such as delirium and visual hallucinations have rarely been reported, and no literature, to the best of our knowledge, specifically describes these effects solely in the SCI population. Findings Four cases of mental status changes and hallucinations in SCI patients attributed to ertapenem therapy are described. Onset of symptoms began between one and six days following initiation of ertapenem and resolved between two to 42 days following discontinuation. Based on the Naranjo probability scale, a probable relationship exists between the adverse events and ertapenem for three out of the four cases. Possible overestimation of renal function and hypoalbuminemia may be contributing factors to the noted adverse reactions. Conclusion/Clinical Relevance The cases described highlight the importance of recognizing ertapenem-associated hallucinations in SCI patients. The population is particularly vulnerable due to risk factors for MDR infections necessitating ertapenem use, possible overestimation of renal function, and a high prevalence of hypoalbuminemia.