Cost Analysis of Azithromycin versus Erythromycin in Pregnancies Complicated by Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the potential cost savings if azithromycin is substituted for erythromycin in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a multicentered study investigating magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy in premature infants. All patients with PPROM who received antibiotics for prophylaxis were included in the analysis. The number of expected doses each patient would have received was calculated for erythromycin, multidose azithromycin, and single-dose azithromycin regimens accounting for latency from PPROM to delivery. The wholesale acquisition cost was used to calculate the expected cost of each regimen. RESULTS: There were 981 PPROM patients who received a penicillin class antibiotic and erythromycin. Patients would have received 7,528 intravenous doses and 10,194 oral doses of erythromycin at a combined cost of $357,169. In comparison, patients would have received 6,422 and 3,942 doses at a cost of $15,669 and $9,574 for the multidose and single-dose azithromycin regimens respectively, which represents a more than 95% cost reduction for either regimen compared with erythromycin. CONCLUSION: The use of azithromycin substituted for erythromycin in the standard antibiotic regimen of women with PPROM represents a potential for substantial cost reduction.

Antibacterial resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes (GAS) from healthy carriers and tonsillitis patients and association with antibacterial sale in the Faroe Islands.

The aim of this study was to investigate the antibacterial resistance of Streptococcus pyogenes (GAS), and correlate the findings with the sales of erythromycin and tetracycline. General practitioners in the Faroe Islands were recruited to send oropharyngeal swabs. From an ongoing pneumococcal study, nasopharyngeal swabs were sampled from healthy children 0-7 years of age. Erythromycin susceptibility data from Iceland were obtained from the reference laboratory at the Landspitali University Hospital. Susceptibility testing in the Faroe Islands and Iceland was performed according to CLSI methods and criteria. The resistance rate to erythromycin and tetracycline found in patients in the Faroe Islands in 2009/2010 was 6% and 30% respectively. Tetracycline resistance in patients declined significantly from 2009 to 2010 (37-10%, p-value = 0.006 < 0.05) and differed significantly between age groups (p-value = 0.03 < 0.05). In Iceland, there was a peak in erythromycin resistance in 2008 (44%) and a substantial decrease in 2009 (5%). Although the prevalence of erythromycin and tetracycline resistance in the Faroe Islands and Iceland may be associated with antimicrobial use, sudden changes can occur with the introduction of new resistant clones.

Preventing COPD exacerbations with macrolides: a review and budget impact analysis.

Long-term treatment with macrolides has recently been shown to reduce COPD exacerbations in doses lower than bactericidal doses. This article aims to critically review the international literature relating to the long-term effectiveness and safety of macrolides and to estimate the budget impact of preventing exacerbations with azithromycin in Belgium. Controlled clinical studies focusing on the prevention of COPD exacerbations with long-term macrolide treatment were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, Controlled Trials Registry of the Cochrane Library, and Social Science and Citation Index. The budget impact of preventing exacerbations with azithromycin in Belgium over a one-year period was calculated as the difference between the additional expenditure of annual treatment with azithromycin and the savings in hospital expenditure arising from fewer COPD exacerbations in patients with GOLD stages II-IV. Prevalence and resource use data were derived from the literature and unit cost data from Belgian sources. The literature review suggests that long-term treatment of COPD patients with azithromycin, erythromycin or clarithromycin is effective and safe, and reduces exacerbations and related hospitalizations. However, uncertainty remains about the specific patient population that is most likely to benefit from long-term macrolide treatment, the optimal dose and duration of macrolide treatment, and the potential impact of long-term macrolide treatment on resistance. The budget impact analysis demonstrated that annual hospital savings of €950 million resulting from fewer exacerbations outweighed additional expenditure on azithromycin of €595 million, implying that the prevention of COPD exacerbations with azithromycin is a cost saving strategy in Belgium.

Sub-antibiotic doses of erythromycin as a prokinetic in abdominal surgeries: reviving the old.

All patients undergoing major abdominal procedures have some degree of gastricatony in the immediate postoperative period, presenting mainly with vomiting. Many prokinetic agents have been used in the past, but none is a universal remedy. Studies showed that subantibiotic doses of erythromycin, a macrolide antibiotic and motilin agonist, accelerates gastric emptying. This study investigated whether preoperative subantibiotic dose oral erythromycin (250 mg), altered residual gastric volume and postoperative adverse effects in patients scheduled for abdominal surgeries. Erythromycin was compared with the commonly used prokinetic metoclopramide and antiemetic ondansetron, in terms of prokinetic efficacy, cost and adverse effects. In a double-blind study, eighty patients (20 each) were allocated randomly to receive orally, either erythromycin 250 mg (E250) or erythromycin 500 mg (E500), or 10 mg metoclopramide (M), or 4 mg ondansetron (Z), an hour pre-induction of anesthesia. Preoperative oral erythromycin in subantibiotic dose 250 mg elicited a significntly lower residual gastric volume (P < 0.001) and a lower VAS for vomiting, compared with ondansetron. As for metoclopramide and erythromycin 500, residual gastric volume was comparable, but E 250 had a lower VAS for vomiting than both groups. Rescue remedy for vomiting was required for groups E500, M and Z (100, 10 and 10%) compared to 0% in group E250. Ultimately, subantibiotic oral dose of erythromycin (250 mg), given 1 hr preoperatively, is an inexpensive prokinetic alternative with a promising post-operative profile which may be superior to the inexpensive prokinetic metoclopramide with known adverse effects, and the expensive antiemetic ondansetron.

Has UK guidance affected general practitioner antibiotic prescribing for otitis media in children?

BACKGROUND: Since 1997, UK guidance has advocated limiting antibiotic prescribing for otitis media. It is not known whether this has influenced general practitioner prescribing practice. Aims and objectives To investigate the trends in diagnoses and antibiotic prescribing for otitis media in children in relation to guidance. METHODS: We used the General Practice Research Database to conduct time-trend analyses of diagnoses and antibiotic prescribing for otitis media in 3 months to 15 years old, between 1990 and 2006. RESULTS: A total of 1 210 237 otitis media episodes were identified in 464 845 children; two-thirds (68%; 818 006) received antibiotics. Twenty-two percent (267 335) were classified as acute, 85% (227 335) of which received antibiotics. Overall, antibiotic prescribing for otitis media declined by 51% between 1995 and 2000. Much of this reduction predated guidance. During this period, prescribing for otitis media coded as acute increased by 22%. Children diagnosed with acute otitis media were more likely to receive antibiotics than otitis media not coded as acute (P < 0.05). From 2000 prescribing plateaued, despite publication of further guidance. Otitis media diagnoses consistently paralleled prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in antibiotic prescribing for otitis media predated guidance. The simultaneous decrease in prescribing for non-acute otitis media and increase for acute otitis media suggest diagnostic transfer, possibly to justify the decision to treat.

Cost-effectiveness of alternative outpatient pelvic inflammatory disease treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVE: Effectiveness differences between outpatient pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) treatment regimens are uncertain, but significant differences in cost exist. GOAL: To examine the influence of antibiotic costs on PID therapy cost-effectiveness. STUDY DESIGN: The authors used a Markov decision model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of recommended antibiotic regimens for PID and performed a value of information analysis to guide future research. RESULTS: Antibiotic costs vary between USD 43 and USD188. Pairwise comparisons, assuming a hypothetical 1% relative risk reduction in PID complications with the more expensive regimen, showed economically reasonable cost-effectiveness ratios. Value of information and sample size considerations support further investigation to detect 10% PID complication rate differences between regimens with >or=USD 50 cost differences. CONCLUSIONS: Within the cost range of recommended regimens, use of more expensive antibiotics would be economically reasonable if relatively small decreases in PID complication rates exist. Further investigation of effectiveness differences between regimens is needed.

Costs and health consequences of chlamydia management strategies among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa.

OBJECTIVES: Chlamydia is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection worldwide and a major cause of morbidity-particularly among women and neonates. We compared costs and health consequences of using point-of-care (POC) tests with current syndromic management among antenatal care attendees in sub-Saharan Africa. We also compared erythromycin with azithromycin treatment and universal with age-based chlamydia management. METHODS: A decision analytical model was developed to compare diagnostic and treatment strategies, using Botswana as a case. Model input was based upon (1) a study of pregnant women in Botswana, (2) literature reviews and (3) expert opinion. We expressed the study outcome in terms of costs (US$), cases cured, magnitude of overtreatment and successful partner treatment. RESULTS: Azithromycin was less costly and more effective than erythromycin. Compared with syndromic management, testing all attendees on their first visit with a 75% sensitive POC test increased the number of cases cured from 1500 to 3500 in a population of 100,000 women, at a cost of US$38 per additional case cured. This cost was lower in high-prevalence populations or if testing was restricted to teenagers. The specific POC tests provided the advantage of substantial reductions in overtreatment with antibiotics and improved partner management. CONCLUSIONS: Using POC tests to diagnose chlamydia during antenatal care in sub-Saharan Africa entails greater health benefits than syndromic management does-and at acceptable costs-especially when restricted to younger women. Changes in diagnostic strategy and treatment regimens may improve people's health and even reduce healthcare budgets.

Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Erythromycin is a potent stimulator of gastrointestinal motility. Recent studies have examined the use of intravenous erythromycin to clear the stomach of blood before oesophago-gastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (UGIH). These studies have shown clinical effectiveness. AIM: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this intervention. METHODS: We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of erythromycin before EGD from the payer's perspective. We found three relevant studies of erythromycin and used these data for the analysis. We obtained costs for intravenous erythromycin and charges for peptic ulcer hospitalization, EGD, surgery, and angiographic embolization. Complication rates were also incorporated from the literature. We implemented a model of health-related quality of life to measure the impact of the intervention. We created a decision-analysis tree and performed a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: A strategy of erythromycin prior to EGD resulted in a cost-effective outcome in a majority of trials using willingness-to-pay figures of USD 0, USD 50,000 and USD 100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). CONCLUSION: Because of the implications for cost saving and increase in QALY, we would recommend giving erythromycin prior to EGD for UGIH.

Single-dose azithromycin versus erythromycin or amoxicillin for Chlamydia trachomatis infection during pregnancy: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

This review aimed to compare data regarding the effectiveness and safety of azithromycin with alternative regimens in the treatment of pregnant women with Chlamydia trachomatis infection. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched to identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The main analysis focused on comparison of azithromycin with erythromycin. In a secondary analysis, azithromycin was compared with erythromycin or amoxicillin. Eight RCTs studying 587 pregnant women with microbiologically documented C. trachomatis infection were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, there was no difference between azithromycin and erythromycin regarding treatment success in intention-to-treat patients (pooled odds ratio (OR)=2.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-10.29) or in clinically evaluated patients (OR=1.46, 95% CI 0.56-3.78). Furthermore, azithromycin was associated with fewer gastrointestinal adverse events (OR=0.11, 95% CI 0.07-0.18), fewer total adverse events (OR=0.11, 95% CI 0.07-0.18), a smaller proportion of patients who withdrew from the study (OR=0.12, 95% CI 0.04-0.37) and better compliance (OR=23.7, 95% CI 9.34-60.14) than erythromycin. The results of the secondary analysis comparing azithromycin with erythromycin or amoxicillin were similar to those of the main analysis. In conclusion, azithromycin was associated with similar effectiveness but less adverse events compared with erythromycin or amoxicillin in the treatment of pregnant women with C. trachomatis infection.

Oral amoxicillin vs. oral erythromycin in the treatment of pyoderma in Bamako, Mali: an open randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Pyoderma (bacterial superficial skin infection) is an extremely common disorder in tropical developing countries. In these settings, Streptococcus pyogenes is considered to be the main etiological agent. Apart from epidemics of poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis where mass treatment with intramuscular benzathine-penicillin is recommended, no recommendation exists for the treatment of pyoderma in this setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of oral amoxicillin in the treatment of pyoderma in Mali, by comparison with oral erythromycin. METHODS: In Bamako, 132 patients with pyoderma, diagnosed and graded as "severe" on clinical grounds, were randomly assigned to an oral treatment by either amoxicillin (50 mg/kg per day) or erythromycin; infections of the follicular appendage were excluded. Both drugs were associated with the topical application of povidone iodine. The patients were evaluated openly at the seventh day of treatment for cure or marked improvement of the clinical features, indicating successful treatment. RESULTS: Three patients were lost to follow-up. Treatment was successful in 57 of 64 patients treated with amoxicillin vs. 58 of 65 patients treated with erythromycin (P = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Amoxicillin was as efficacious as erythromycin in the treatment of severe pyoderma in Mali. Owing to its efficacy, added to high availability and low cost, this compound should be considered a first-line treatment of this disorder in this country, and perhaps in other countries where this condition presents in a similar way.

[Diagnosis and therapy of Rhodococcus equi infection in the horse]. / De diagnostiek en therapeutische mogelijkheden van een Rhodococcus equi infectie bij het paard.

Infection with Rhodococcus equi is an important cause of pneumonia in foals, but other organ systems may also be affected. The intracellular presence of R. equi and the formation of granulomatous and suppurative inflammatory tissue mean that prolonged treatment is needed. The pharmacological properties of the combination of erythromycin and rifampicin have improved the survival of foals infected with R. equi; however, erythromycin can cause adverse reactions in foals and mares, which has prompted the search for alternative therapies. The combination of azithromycin or clarithromycin with rifampicin seems to be a promising alternative. However these combinations are expensive and adverse effects remain to be determined, especially in the dams of treated foals. Thus correct diagnosis and appropriate use of drugs are essential for the treatment of R. equi infection in foals.

Randomised controlled multiple treatment comparison to provide a cost-effectiveness rationale for the selection of antimicrobial therapy in acne.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relative efficacy and cost-effectiveness of five of the most commonly used antimicrobial preparations for treating mild to moderate facial acne in the community; the propensity of each regimen to give rise to local and systemic adverse events; whether pre-existing bacterial resistance to the prescribed antibiotic resulted in reduced efficacy; and whether some antimicrobial regimens were less likely to give rise to resistant propionibacterial strains. DESIGN: This was a parallel group randomised assessor-blind controlled clinical trial. It was a pragmatic design with intention-to-treat analysis. All treatments were given for 18 weeks, after a 4-week treatment free period. Outcomes were measured at 0, 6, 12 and 18 weeks. SETTING: Primary care practices and colleges in and around Nottingham and Leeds, and one practice in Stockton-on-Tees, England. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 649 people aged 12--39 years, all with mild to moderate inflammatory acne of the face. INTERVENTIONS: Study participants were randomised into one of five groups: 500 mg oral oxytetracycline (non-proprietary) twice daily (b.d.) + topical vehicle control b.d.; 100 mg oral Minocin MR (minocycline) once daily (o.d.) + topical vehicle control b.d.; topical Benzamycin (3% erythromycin + 5% benzoyl peroxide) b.d. + oral placebo o.d.; topical Stiemycin (2% erythromycin) o.d. + topical Panoxyl Aquagel (5% benzoyl peroxide) o.d. + oral placebo o.d., and topical Panoxyl Aquagel (5% benzoyl peroxide) b.d. + oral placebo o.d. (the active comparator group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The two primary outcome measures were: (1) the proportion of patients with at least moderate self-assessed improvement as recorded on a six-point Likert scale, and (2) change in inflamed lesion count (red spots). RESULTS: The best response rates were seen with two of the topical regimens (erythromycin plus benzoyl peroxide administered separately o.d. or in a combined proprietary formulation b.d.), compared with benzoyl peroxide alone, oxytetracycline (500 mg b.d.) and minocycline (100 mg o.d.), although differences were small. The percentage of participants with at least moderate improvement was 53.8% for minocycline (the least effective) and 66.1% for the combined erythromycin/benzoyl peroxide formulation (the most effective); the adjusted odds ratio for these two treatments was 1.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04 to 2.90]. Similar efficacy rankings were obtained using lesion counts, acne severity scores and global rating by assessor. Benzoyl peroxide was the most cost-effective and minocycline the least cost-effective regimen (ratio of means 12.3; difference in means -0.051 units/GBP, 95% CI -0.063 to -0.039). The efficacy of oxytetracycline was similar to that of minocycline, but at approximately one-seventh of the cost. For all regimens, the largest reductions in acne severity were recorded in the first 6 weeks. Reductions in disability scores using the Dermatology Quality of Life Scales were largest for both topical erythromycin-containing regimens and minocycline. The two topical erythromycin-containing regimens produced the largest reductions in the prevalence and population density of cutaneous propionibacteria, including antibiotic-resistant variants, and these were equally effective in participants with and without erythromycin-resistant propionibacteria. The clinical efficacy of both tetracyclines was compromised in participants colonised by tetracycline-resistant propionibacteria. None of the regimens promoted an overall increase in the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant strains. Systemic adverse events were more common with the two oral antibiotics. Local irritation was more common with the topical treatments, particularly benzoyl peroxide. Residual acne was present in most participants (95%) at the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: The response of mild to moderate inflammatory acne to antimicrobial treatment in the community is not optimal. Only around half to two-thirds of trial participants reported at least a moderate improvement over an 18-week study period; extending treatment beyond 12 weeks increased overall benefit slightly. Around one-quarter dropped out when using such treatments, and 55% sought further treatment after 18 weeks. Topical antimicrobial therapies performed at least as well as oral antibiotics in terms of clinical efficacy. Benzoyl peroxide was the most cost-effective and minocycline the least cost-effective therapy for facial acne. The efficacy of all three topical regimens was not compromised by pre-existing propionibacterial resistance. Benzoyl peroxide was associated with a greater frequency and severity of local irritant reactions. It is suggested that the use of a combination of topical benzoyl peroxide and erythromycin gives less irritation and better quality of life. There was little difference between erythromycin plus benzoyl peroxide administered separately and the combined proprietary formulation in terms of efficacy or local irritation, except that the former was nearly three times more cost-effective. The data on cost-effectiveness, and outcomes in patients with resistant propionibacterial floras, did not support the first line use of minocycline for mild to moderate inflammatory acne of the face. Three priority areas for clinical research in acne are: defining end-points in acne trials (i.e. what is a satisfactory outcome?); developing and validating better patient-based measures for assessing treatment effects on facial and truncal acne; and exploring patient characteristics that may modify treatment effects (efficacy and tolerability).

Comparison of five antimicrobial regimens for treatment of mild to moderate inflammatory facial acne vulgaris in the community: randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of five antimicrobial regimens for mild to moderate facial acne and whether propionibacterial antibiotic resistance affects treatment response. METHODS: In this randomised, observer-masked trial, 649 community participants were allocated one of five antibacterial regimens. Primary outcomes were patients' self-assessed improvement and reduction in inflamed lesions at 18 weeks. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Moderate or greater improvement at 18 weeks was reported in 72 (55%) of 131 participants assigned oral oxytetracycline plus topical placebo, 70 (54%) of 130 assigned oral minocycline plus topical placebo, 78 (60%) of 130 assigned topical benzoyl peroxide plus oral placebo, 84 (66%) of 127 assigned topical erythromycin and benzoyl peroxide in a combined formulation plus oral placebo, and 82 (63%) of 131 assigned topical erythromycin and benzoyl peroxide separately plus oral placebo. Most improvement occurred in the first 6 weeks. Treatment differences for the proportion of people with at least moderate improvement were: minocycline versus oxytetracycline -1.2% (unadjusted 95% CI -13.3 to 10.9); combined erythromycin and benzoyl peroxide versus oxytetracycline 11.1% (-0.7 to 22.9) and versus minocycline 12.3% (0.4 to 24.2); erythromycin and benzoyl peroxide separately versus combined formulation -3.5% (-15.2 to 8.2); benzoyl peroxide versus oxytetracycline 5.0% (-7.0 to 17.0), versus minocycline 6.2% (-5.8 to 18.2), and versus combined formulation -6.1% (-17.9 to 5.7). Benzoyl peroxide was the most cost-effective treatment. Efficacy of both tetracyclines was reduced by pre-existing tetracycline resistance. INTERPRETATION: Topical benzoyl peroxide and benzoyl peroxide/erythromycin combinations are similar in efficacy to oral oxytetracycline and minocycline and are not affected by propionibacterial antibiotic resistance.

Cost-effectiveness of IV-to-oral switch therapy: azithromycin vs cefuroxime with or without erythromycin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of IV-to-oral regimens of azithromycin vs cefuroxime with or without erythromycin in the treatment of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). PATIENTS: Of the 268 evaluable patients enrolled into a randomized, multicenter clinical trial of adults, 266 patients had sufficient data to be included in this cost-effectiveness analysis. One hundred thirty-six patients received azithromycin, and 130 patients received cefuroxime with or without erythromycin. METHODS: A pharmacoeconomic analysis from the hospital provider perspective was conducted. Health-care resource utilization was extracted from the clinical database and converted to national reference costs. Decision analysis was used to structure and characterize outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were performed, and statistics were applied to the cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: The clinical success and adverse event rates and antibiotic-related length of stay were 78%, 11.8%, and 5.8 days for the azithromycin group and 75%, 20.7%, and 6.4 days for the group receiving cefuroxime with or without erythromycin, respectively. Geometric mean treatment costs were 4,104 US dollars (95% confidence interval [CI], 3,874 to 4,334 US dollars) for the azithromycin group, and 4,578 US dollars (95% CI, 4,319 to 4,837 US dollars) for the group receiving cefuroxime with or without erythromycin (p = 0.06). The cost-effectiveness ratios were 5,265 US dollars per expected cure for the azithromycin group, and 6,145 US dollars per expected cure for group receiving cefuroxime with or without erythromycin (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher per-dose purchase price, overall costs with azithromycin tended to be lower due to decreased duration of therapy, lower preparation and administration costs, and reduced hospital length of stay. As empiric therapy, azithromycin monotherapy was cost-effective compared to cefuroxime with or without erythromycin for patients hospitalized with CAP who have no underlying cardiopulmonary disease, and no risk factors for either drug-resistant pneumococci or enteric Gram-negative pathogens.

The efficacy of an antibiotic protocol for community-acquired pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of an antibiotic protocol to avoid empirical use of third-generation cephalosporins in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective case review of patients with CAP one year after implementing the protocol. Comparison was made with patients with CAP treated at a metropolitan tertiary referral hospital (where use of third-generation cephalosporins was common). PARTICIPANTS: 86 patients (district hospital with an antibiotic protocol) and 72 patients (metropolitan tertiary referral hospital), January - June 1999. OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of staff adherence to the protocol; patient characteristics associated with poor protocol adherence; demographic and prognostic features of both groups at presentation; duration of intravenous therapy, time to defervescence, length of stay; inpatient mortality rates; and drug cost savings per patient treated according to the protocol. RESULTS: Overall protocol adherence rate was 60%. Patients with penicillin allergy were significantly less likely to receive treatment according to the protocol (P<0.001). At the district hospital, patients were generally older and taking more regular medications. Patients at each hospital had similar prognostic factors and demographic features at presentation. Inhospital mortality (P=0.92; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.07), duration of fever (P=0.57) and length of stay (P=0.78) were not significantly different between patients treated empirically with penicillin and those treated empirically with third-generation cephalosporins. Treating a patient according to the protocol saved an average of $77.44 in drug costs. CONCLUSION: One year after implementation, our protocol for treating CAP is proving efficacious, although levels of adherence could improve.

Cost-effectiveness of sparfloxacin compared with other oral antimicrobials in outpatient treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

We examined the cost-effectiveness of sparfloxacin compared with other selected oral antimicrobials in outpatient treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) using clinical pathway-based decision analysis. Cost estimates were obtained from medical claims databases and Medicare reimbursement schedules. Probability estimates were derived from published clinical trials, the medical literature, and clinical expert opinion. Overall adjusted efficacy rates were 89% for sparfloxacin, 79.4% for azithromycin, 77.8% for clarithromycin, 73% for cefaclor, 70.8% for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and 69% for erythromycin. The expected total cost/CAP episode of treatment with sparfloxacin was $216.07 compared with $258.97, $297.08, $345.75, $389.80, and $395.93 for azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and cefaclor, respectively. Therapy with sparfloxacin for managing CAP is cost effective-relative to other commonly prescribed antibiotics, resulting in net cost savings.

Dental therapeutic indications for the newer long-acting macrolide antibiotics.

BACKGROUND: When treating oral infections, clinicians have used the macrolide antibiotic erythromycin as an alternative antibiotic for patients who have documented allergic reactions to penicillins. In this article, the author reports on his assessment of the pharmacology of erythromycin and the newer macrolide antibiotics, as well as of their indications for the prevention of bacterial endocarditis and their possible use for oral-dental infections. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The author reviewed the current clinical pharmacology literature with specific emphasis on reports indicating these antibiotics' efficacy in treating oral-dental infections. RESULTS: Azithromycin, clarithromycin and dirithromycin are erythromycin analogues that are currently marketed in the United States. All three have the therapeutic advantages over erythromycin of longer durations of action, enhanced acid stabilities and improved tissue distributions. A lower incidence of gastrointestinal distress and abdominal cramping is reported for all three of these newer agents than for erythromycin. Azithromycin and dirithromycin do not appear to compete for the same hepatic drug-metabolizing enzymes as erythromycin and therefore are not associated with the same drug interactions. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The newer macrolide antibiotics offer the advantage of fewer adverse gastrointestinal effects than erythromycin and dosing regimens of only once or twice a day. Yet, the extremely high price of the newer macrolides compared with that of erythromycin limits their routine use.