Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 412
Filter
1.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 103(2): 111-116, 2023 Jan 10.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36597738

ABSTRACT

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of stent placement in the treatment of malignant tracheoesophageal fistula (MTEF) and the factors affecting the closure of the fistula. Methods: Clinical, pathological, laboratory, and imaging data of 288 patients with MTEF admitted to Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University from 2015 to 2021were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, there were 208 males; the age was (63.6±10.5) years. A total of 94 patients received conservative treatment (conservative group), and 194 in the stent group (170 cases with esophageal stents and 24 cases with tracheal stents). Patients were followed-up at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months to evaluate the effect of stent implantation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze factors affecting fistula closure. Results: Age, fistula size, leukocyte count before treatment, and fistula location were significantly different between the conservative group and the stent group (P<0.05). The Karnofsky functional status (KPS) score before treatment in the conservative group was lower than the stent group, (45.1±1.0) vs (51.8±0.7) scores, respectively (P<0.001). After 2 weeks and 1 month of treatment, improvement in KPS scores was significantly better in the stent group than in the conservative group (P<0.05). At 1 month, the pulmonary infection rate in the stent group was 33.5% (58/173), significantly lower than that in the conservative group [77.0% (47/61); P<0.001]. Among the 288 patients, the fistula was closed in 196 patients and unclosed in 92 patients. Fistula size (OR=3.429, 95%CI: 1.623-7.829, P=0.001), leukocyte count before treatment (OR=1.160, 95%CI: 1.027-1.317, P=0.018), KPS score before treatment (OR=0.898, 95%CI: 0.848-0.945, P<0.001) and the treatment method (conservative treatment as reference, esophageal stent OR=0.010, 95%CI: 0.004-0.030, P<0.001; tracheal stent OR=0.003, 95%CI: 0.000-0.042, P<0.001) were factors affecting fistula closure. In the 170 patients in the esophageal stent group, early complications (≤24 h) occurred in 71 patients, and late (>24 h) complications occurred in 11 patients. While in the 24 patients in the tracheal stent group, 9 had early complications and 2 had late complications. Conclusions: Stent placement is an effective treatment for MTEF compared to conservative treatment. Stent treatment, small fistula size, low pre-treatment leukocyte count, and high pre-treatment KPS score are beneficial to fistula closure.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Fistula , Esophageal Neoplasms , Tracheoesophageal Fistula , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Tracheoesophageal Fistula/complications , Tracheoesophageal Fistula/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Stents/adverse effects , Trachea , Treatment Outcome , Esophageal Fistula/therapy , Esophageal Fistula/complications
2.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 46(5): 409-413, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36402128

ABSTRACT

Atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare but devastating complication of radiofrequency ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) and is associated with high mortality rates. Whereas most cases of AEF are treated by emergency surgical interventions, we report a case of paroxysmal AF with AEF after combined therapy of catheter ablation and percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), which was treated successfuly without major surgery or esophageal stenting. He was presented 18 days after the procedure, suffering chest pain, fever, and a transient loss of consciousness. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest disclosed a small accumulation of air in the region of the left atrium adjacent to the esophagus, suggesting AEF. Supported by early aggressive antibiotic therapy, pericardial drainage and a fasting state with adequate parenteral nutrition, resulted in improvement of his condition with no recurrence of symptoms. Subsequent chest CT scans confirmed disappearance of the leaked air and the patient was discharged home 28 days after admission with no neurological compromise. Early detection, rapid treatment and constant awareness of potential fatal consequences are prerequisites for successful treatment of this complication and prevention of fatal outcome.


Subject(s)
Atrial Appendage , Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Esophageal Fistula , Male , Humans , Atrial Appendage/surgery , Esophageal Fistula/etiology , Esophageal Fistula/therapy , Heart Atria , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects
3.
Clin J Gastroenterol ; 15(6): 1029-1034, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36070174

ABSTRACT

We describe a case of esophageal cancer after proton therapy that resulted in an esophagoaortic fistula after photodynamic therapy (PDT). A 49-year-old woman with esophageal cancer (cT1bN0M0, cStage I) underwent chemotherapy (5-FU and cisplatin) and radiotherapy (proton therapy to the cancer lesion after X-ray radiotherapy to the regional lymph nodes). Despite a complete response of the primary tumor, local recurrence was observed 10 months after treatment. PDT was performed as a salvage treatment. She was transported to the emergency department in a state of hemorrhagic shock due to hematemesis 50 days after PDT. We diagnosed an esophagoaortic fistula caused by esophageal perforation, and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and thoracic endovascular aortic repair were performed. The patient was successfully rescued after three surgeries (esophagectomy, extraesophageal fistula, aortic vascular replacement, and gastrointestinal reconstruction). In addition to X-ray radiotherapy before photodynamic therapy, proton therapy in combination with the vascular shutdown effects of PDT may have caused ischemia of the esophagus, resulting in an esophagoaortic fistula. When performing PDT, the type of radiation therapy and the location of the lesion should be examined to assess the risk of penetration or perforation.


Subject(s)
Aortic Diseases , Esophageal Fistula , Esophageal Neoplasms , Photochemotherapy , Proton Therapy , Vascular Fistula , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Salvage Therapy , Esophageal Fistula/therapy , Esophageal Fistula/surgery , Photochemotherapy/adverse effects , Proton Therapy/adverse effects , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Aortic Diseases/surgery , Vascular Fistula/therapy , Vascular Fistula/surgery
4.
Gastroenterol. hepatol. (Ed. impr.) ; 45(3): 198-203, Mar. 2022. ilus, graf, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-204208

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El uso de prótesis esofágicas para el manejo endoscópico de fístulas y perforaciones se ha convertido en un procedimiento habitual. Una de sus limitaciones es su alta tasa de migración. Para resolver esta situación, se ha propuesto el uso de prótesis cubiertas de doble malla.Objetivos: Analizar nuestra experiencia práctica en el empleo de prótesis esofágicas cubiertas de doble malla (PECDM) (modelo Niti S™ DOUBLE™ Esophageal Metal Stent) en pacientes con fístula o perforación esofágica.Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo y unicéntrico, donde se incluyen pacientes con diagnóstico de fístula o perforación esofágica, desde noviembre 2010 hasta octubre 2018. Como objetivo primario, se evaluará su eficacia en términos de éxito técnico. Como objetivo secundario, se analizará su perfil de seguridad.Resultados: Se incluyeron inicialmente un total de 31 pacientes, siendo 8 de ellos excluidos por fallecimiento por causas ajenas a la técnica. Se detectó un éxito técnico del 100%, con un éxito primario del 75% tras la recolocación de la prótesis. Entre sus complicaciones, la migración ocurrió en un 21,7% de los pacientes (n=5), resolviéndose vía endoscópica en el 100% de los casos.Conclusiones: Según nuestros hallazgos, las PECDM suponen una alternativa en el tratamiento de fístulas y perforaciones esofágicas, con una alta tasa de éxito en la resolución de fístulas y baja de complicaciones, en contraste con lo expuesto en las series publicadas. En todos los casos, la migración de la prótesis se resolvió mediante recolocación endoscópica, sin requerir nueva prótesis ni cirugía.(AU)


Introduction: The use of esophageal stents for the endoscopic management of esophageal leaks and perforations has become a usual procedure. One of its limitations is its high migration rate. To solve this incovenience, the double-layered covered esophageal stents have become an option.Objectives: To analyse our daily practice according to the usage of double-layered covered esophageal metal stents (DLCEMS) (Niti S™ DOUBLE™ Esophageal Metal Stent Model) among patients diagnosed of esophageal leak or perforation.Methods: Retrospective, descriptive and unicentric study, with inclusion of patients diagnosed of esophageal leak or perforation, from November 2010 until October 2018. The main aim is to evaluate the efficacy of DLCEMS, in terms of primary success and technical success. The secondary aim is to evaluate their (the DLCEMS) safety profile.Results: Thirty-one patients were firstly included. Among those, 8 were excluded due to mortality not related to the procedure. Following stent placement, technical success was reached in 100% of the cases, and primary success, in 75% (n=17). Among the complications, stent migration was present in 21.7% of the patients (n=5), in whom the incident was solved by endoscopic means.Conclusions: According to our findings, DLCEMS represent an alternative for esophageal leak and perforation management, with a high success rate in leak and perforation resolutions and low complication rate, in contrast to the published data. The whole number of migrations were corrected by endoscopic replacement, without the need of a new stent or surgery.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Prostheses and Implants , Esophageal Perforation , Esophagus , Esophageal Fistula/therapy , Esophageal Perforation/therapy , Postoperative Complications , Esophageal Diseases , Inpatients , Gastroenterology , Retrospective Studies , Epidemiology, Descriptive
5.
Indian J Pediatr ; 89(11): 1107-1109, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35226286

ABSTRACT

Bronchoesophageal fistula is a rare complication of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in children. An adolescent girl who was diagnosed of tubercular mediastinal lymphadenopathy with associated bronchoesophageal fistula at presentation, is reported here. This 16-y-old girl presented with high-grade fever, cough, decreased appetite, weight loss for 3 mo, and breathlessness for 10 d. Chest radiograph revealed hilar lymphadenopathy with bilateral pleural effusion. GA GeneXpert was positive for mycobacterium and rifampicin sensitivity. Despite antitubercular therapy cough persisted and there was a history of dry cough with food intake, especially more on liquids. Bronchoscopy and CECT chest confirmed bronchoesophageal fistula in the right main bronchus just below the carina. Child continued on tube feeding and antitubercular therapy. After completion of intensive phase, child improved with resolution of clinical symptoms and scarring of tract on repeat bronchoscopy. It is concluded that in children with combination of mediastinal lymphadenopathy and persistent cough following intake of food needs careful evaluation for trachea/bronchoesophageal fistula.


Subject(s)
Bronchial Fistula , Esophageal Fistula , Lymphadenopathy , Tuberculosis, Lymph Node , Adolescent , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Bronchial Fistula/diagnosis , Bronchial Fistula/etiology , Bronchial Fistula/therapy , Child , Cough/complications , Esophageal Fistula/diagnosis , Esophageal Fistula/etiology , Esophageal Fistula/therapy , Female , Humans , Lymphadenopathy/drug therapy , Rifampin/therapeutic use , Tuberculosis, Lymph Node/complications , Tuberculosis, Lymph Node/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Lymph Node/drug therapy
6.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 113(2): 669-673, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34391698

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Endoluminal vacuum (EVAC) therapy has gained popularity as a minimally invasive option for contained esophageal leaks. EVAC therapy may be useful for esophagogastric anastomotic leak fistulizing to the airway. DESCRIPTION: This report describes EVAC therapy of an esophagobronchial fistula with video depicting the procedure, including technical tips. Video and photographic evidence of progression and ultimate resolution is included. EVALUATION: Sponge exchanges were completed every 3 to 4 days. EVAC therapy was administered through a transnasal approach. In the presented case, a total of 11 exchanges over 6 weeks were required. EVAC sponge placement was transitioned from intracavitary to endoluminal for the final 4 treatments. All but 4 exchanges were able to be completed at the bedside in a monitored setting with sedation. CONCLUSIONS: An esophageal leak that has fistulized to a main airway is a rare and challenging clinical problem. Definitive EVAC therapy for esophageal anastomotic leak with esophagobronchial fistula is a feasible option in selected cases.


Subject(s)
Bronchial Fistula/therapy , Esophageal Fistula/therapy , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/methods , Aged , Bronchoscopy/methods , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
7.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 45(3): 198-203, 2022 Mar.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34052404

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The use of esophageal stents for the endoscopic management of esophageal leaks and perforations has become a usual procedure. One of its limitations is its high migration rate. To solve this incovenience, the double-layered covered esophageal stents have become an option. OBJECTIVES: To analyse our daily practice according to the usage of double-layered covered esophageal metal stents (DLCEMS) (Niti S™ DOUBLE™ Esophageal Metal Stent Model) among patients diagnosed of esophageal leak or perforation. METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive and unicentric study, with inclusion of patients diagnosed of esophageal leak or perforation, from November 2010 until October 2018. The main aim is to evaluate the efficacy of DLCEMS, in terms of primary success and technical success. The secondary aim is to evaluate their (the DLCEMS) safety profile. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were firstly included. Among those, 8 were excluded due to mortality not related to the procedure. Following stent placement, technical success was reached in 100% of the cases, and primary success, in 75% (n=17). Among the complications, stent migration was present in 21.7% of the patients (n=5), in whom the incident was solved by endoscopic means. CONCLUSIONS: According to our findings, DLCEMS represent an alternative for esophageal leak and perforation management, with a high success rate in leak and perforation resolutions and low complication rate, in contrast to the published data. The whole number of migrations were corrected by endoscopic replacement, without the need of a new stent or surgery.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Fistula/therapy , Esophageal Perforation/therapy , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Prosthesis Design , Self Expandable Metallic Stents , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Female , Foreign-Body Migration/epidemiology , Foreign-Body Migration/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Self Expandable Metallic Stents/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
11.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 113(1): 14-22, ene. 2021. ilus, tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-199883

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: the management of postoperative esophageal leaks is a huge therapeutic challenge. Thanks to the advances in endoscopy, treatment with esophageal stents has been proposed as a valid option. AIMS: the main objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the use of fully covered esophageal metal stents in the treatment of postoperative esophageal leaks. METHODS: a retrospective observational study was performed in patients with postoperative esophageal leaks, treated with fully covered self-expandable metal stents between June 2011 and May 2018. RESULTS: twenty-five patients were evaluated and 34 stents were placed. The closure of the leak was observed in 21 patients after removal of the stent, with an overall technical success rate of 84 %. The mean time with a stent placed for closure of the fistula was 55.7 ± 27.11 days/patient (mean of 39 ± 24.30 days/stent). The most frequent complication was a partial distal stent migration (7/34 stents), followed by five cases of complete migration into the stomach. CONCLUSIONS: endoscopic treatment with fully covered selfexpandable metal stents seems to be an effective and safe first-line treatment for postoperative esophageal leaks, according to the experience in our center


No disponible


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Treatment Outcome , Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Esophageal Perforation/surgery , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Anastomotic Leak/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Barium Sulfate , Esophageal Fistula/etiology , Esophageal Fistula/therapy
12.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 69(3): 216-222, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32114691

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tracheo- or bronchoesophageal fistula (TBF) occurring after esophagectomy represent a rare but devastating complication. Management remains challenging and controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of different treatment approaches and to propose recommendations for the management of TBF. METHODS: From 2008 to 2018, 15 patients were treated because of TBF and were analyzed with respect to fistula appearance, treatment strategy (stenting, endoscopic vacuum therapy and/or surgical reintervention) and outcome. RESULTS: In each case, the fistula was small, located close to the tracheal bifurcation and associated simultaneously (n = 6, 40%) or metachronously (n = 9, 60%) with an anastomotic leakage. Latter was covered by esophageal stents in six patients which in turn resulted in occurrence of TBF at a later time in five patients. Management of TBF included conservative therapy (n = 3), stenting (n = 6), or suturing (n = 6). Ten patients underwent rethoracotomy. Treatment failure was observed in eight patients (53%). In all patients, treatment was accompanied by progressive sepsis. On the contrary, all seven patients with successful defect closure remained in good general condition. CONCLUSION: Fistula appearance was similar in all patients. Implementation of esophageal stents cannot be recommended because of possibility of TBF at a later time point. Surgery is usually required and should preferably be performed when the patient's condition has been optimized at a single-stage repair. Esophageal diversion can only be recommended in patients with persisting mediastinitis. The key element for successful treatment of TBF, however, is control over sepsis; otherwise, outcome of TBF is devastating.


Subject(s)
Bronchial Fistula/therapy , Bronchoscopy , Conservative Treatment , Esophageal Fistula/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Suture Techniques , Tracheoesophageal Fistula/therapy , Aged , Bronchial Fistula/diagnostic imaging , Bronchial Fistula/etiology , Bronchoscopy/adverse effects , Bronchoscopy/instrumentation , Conservative Treatment/adverse effects , Esophageal Fistula/diagnostic imaging , Esophageal Fistula/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stents , Suture Techniques/adverse effects , Time Factors , Tracheoesophageal Fistula/diagnostic imaging , Tracheoesophageal Fistula/etiology , Treatment Outcome
13.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 55(4): 419-421, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33375907

ABSTRACT

The carotid-esophageal fistula is a rare and serious complication of the metallic esophageal prosthesis. A high index of suspicion is required for early diagnosis and treatment, decreasing the morbidity and mortality rate of this severe complication. We report a case of a 4-year-old boy presenting severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to a carotid-esophageal fistula, secondary to deployment of an esophageal metallic prosthesis for treatment of a recurrent stenosis. The carotid pseudo-aneurism was successfully treated with stents and coils. Although endovascular treatment is a safe and effective option, arterial stenting in children needs further studies with long-term follow-up.


Subject(s)
Carotid Arteries , Embolization, Therapeutic , Endovascular Procedures , Esophageal Fistula/therapy , Esophageal Stenosis/therapy , Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Stents , Vascular Fistula/therapy , Carotid Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Child, Preschool , Embolization, Therapeutic/instrumentation , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Esophageal Fistula/diagnostic imaging , Esophageal Fistula/etiology , Esophageal Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Male , Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Fistula/diagnostic imaging , Vascular Fistula/etiology
14.
Clin J Gastroenterol ; 13(6): 1041-1045, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32869176

ABSTRACT

Esophageal bypass surgery is an effective treatment strategy for esophageal cancer with esophago-tracheobronchial fistula. We herein report an esophageal cancer patient with esophago-pulmonary fistula who achieved a long-term survival but died suddenly because of cardiac tamponade. A 70-year-old male patient with esophago-pulmonary fistula due to esophageal tumor invasion underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy as the initial treatment. Esophageal bypass surgery followed by additional chemotherapy was performed, and the patient survived for a long time. Four years and six months later, a small abscess in an esophago-pulmonary fistula was visualized on computed tomography. One month later, he suffered suddenly severe dyspnea and died. An autopsy suggested that the direct cause of death had been cardiac tamponade due to atrio-pericardial fistula. Definitive therapy for esophageal cancer with fistula after esophageal bypass is an effective treatment, but close special attention must be paid to the possibility of irradiation-related late toxicity.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Tamponade , Esophageal Fistula , Esophageal Neoplasms , Aged , Cardiac Tamponade/etiology , Cardiac Tamponade/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Esophageal Fistula/etiology , Esophageal Fistula/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Male
15.
Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc ; 27(1): 39-42, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32239824

ABSTRACT

Aortoesophageal fistulas are uncommon, dreadful vascular events, most frequently found in the setting of thoracic aorta aneurysms. Patients usually present with thoracic pain, dysphagia and sentinel hematemesis - the Chiari triad - followed by life threatening hematemesis. Emergent open surgery with debridement of necrotic tissue and in situ aortic graft repair is currently the best strategy. However, in patients which cannot withstand surgery, endovascular repair is currently gaining acceptance as a palliative treatment or as a bridge to surgery. We present a case of a 55-year-old female with a past of heavy alcohol abuse and a previously unknown massive aortic aneurysm, who presented to the emergency department complai- ning of acute dysphagia and epigastric pain. An abdominal ultrasound revealed left pleural effusion and suspected clots in the pleural space. A thoracic CTA was promptly done, where a spontaneous ruptured aortic aneurysm with aortoesophageal fistula was discovered. The team, fearing open surgery due to poor cardiac function, opted for a thoracic endovascular aortic repair. The aortoesophageal fistula dissected the esophageal wall in all of its thickness without rupture into the lumen. This was complicated with esophageal ischemia, aneurysmal sac infection and mediastinitis. Because the patient was in shock, in order to help control the infection, an esophageal prosthesis was placed, followed by proximal esophagostomy, distal esophageal closure and gastrostomy. Six months after initial presentation, the patient died at the emergency room, shortly after reentering with massive hematemesis and hypovolemic shock of undetermined origin.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic , Aortic Rupture , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Esophageal Fistula , Vascular Fistula , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/complications , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/therapy , Aortic Rupture/complications , Aortic Rupture/therapy , Esophageal Fistula/complications , Esophageal Fistula/therapy , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Palliative Care , Vascular Fistula/complications , Vascular Fistula/therapy
16.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(3): e18806, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32011485

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Esophagopleural fistula (EPF) is a rare critical life-threatening condition that features high misdiagnosis rate. Although various surgical and conservative techniques have been developed for the treatment of EPF, the mortality rate of EPF remains high. PATIENT CONCERNS: An 81-year-old man with hepatic cirrhosis caused by schistosomiasis was admitted with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. DIAGNOSES: Upper endoscopy revealed bleeding large esophageal varices, and endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) was performed. Two weeks after the EIS was performed, the patient developed pyrexia, left-sided pleuritic chest pain. Air and pleural effusion were showed in the left pleural cavity by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and a linear fistulous communication was noticed from the distal esophagus. These findings were consistent with hepatic cirrhosis, esophageal varices, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and esophagopleural fistula. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was intensively treated with endoscopic self-expandable metallic stent (covered-SEMS) implantation and comprehensive treatments (including thoracic closed drainage, antibiotics, nasojejunal nutrition, and antacids). OUTCOMES: The patient was completely cured without recurrence during a 6 months of follow-up by comprehensive conservative treatments. LESSONS: This case indicates that pleural effusion with food residue is a specific finding in EPF. Thorax CT exhibited high sensitivity for the diagnosis of EPF. Endoscopic self-expandable metallic stent implantation and comprehensive conservative treatments may be preferable for the severe liver disease with EPF.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Esophageal Fistula/etiology , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/therapy , Sclerotherapy , Aged, 80 and over , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Esophageal Fistula/diagnostic imaging , Esophageal Fistula/therapy , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/diagnostic imaging , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/etiology , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/therapy , Male , Schistosomiasis mansoni/complications , Schistosomiasis mansoni/therapy , Sclerotherapy/adverse effects , Sclerotherapy/methods , Self Expandable Metallic Stents
18.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 30(1): 146-148, 2020 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31586418

ABSTRACT

Oesophago-pleural fistula is an uncommon complication after pneumonectomy, usually related to high morbidity and mortality. Due to its rarity and heterogeneous clinical presentation, its diagnosis and management are challenging issues. Here, we report the case of a patient with a history of pneumonectomy for a tracheal tumour, who developed an asymptomatic oesophago-pleural fistula 7 years after primary surgery. In consideration of the patient's good clinical status and after verifying the preservation of respiratory and digestive functions, a bold conservative approach was adopted. Five-year follow-up computed tomography did not disclose any sign of recurrence of disease and showed a stable, chronic fistula.


Subject(s)
Conservative Treatment/methods , Esophageal Fistula/therapy , Pleural Diseases/therapy , Pneumonectomy/adverse effects , Bronchoscopy , Esophageal Fistula/diagnosis , Esophageal Fistula/etiology , Female , Fistula/diagnosis , Fistula/etiology , Fistula/therapy , Humans , Middle Aged , Pleural Diseases/diagnosis , Pleural Diseases/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Tracheal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Tracheal Neoplasms/surgery
19.
Surg Endosc ; 34(2): 564-568, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31020435

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Malignant strictures and fistulas of the esophagus adversely affect quality of life (QOL) and prognosis, and stenting is considered a useful therapy for improving QOL. However, the predictive factors for improving dysphagia after esophageal stenting are unclear. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate patients with esophageal malignant strictures and fistulas who underwent stenting and investigate the factors for dysphagia improvement after stenting. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with malignant esophageal strictures and fistulas were treated with a self-expandable metallic stent over a period of 5 years and 6 months. The main outcome was improvement in the dysphagia score. We divided the patients into dysphagia improved and non-improved groups after esophageal stenting. Sex, age, cause of stenting (primary or non-primary esophageal cancers), prior treatments, such as chemotherapy and radiation, type of esophageal stents (covered or non-covered), dysphagia score before stenting, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of the patients before stenting were evaluated. Student's t test and Fisher's exact test were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Factors with a P value < 0.2, age, and sex were included and evaluated using a multiple logistic regression model. Statistical significance was defined as a P value < 0.05. RESULTS: Stent placements succeeded in all cases without fatal complications. The dysphagia score improved in 15 patients. Twelve patients had primary lesions, and another 12 had non-primary lesions. The reasons for stenting were malignant strictures in 20 patients and esophageal fistulas in 4 patients. There were no significant differences in any factors, except PS before stenting (P = 0.003), between the improved and non-improved groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis results demonstrated that improvement in the dysphagia score was significantly associated with PS before stenting (adjusted odds ratio = 0.035, 95% CI 0.003-0.44, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal stenting is safe and effective in patients with malignant esophageal strictures and fistulas. PS is an independent factor for dysphagia improvement after stenting.


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders/therapy , Esophageal Fistula/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Stenosis/therapy , Karnofsky Performance Status , Self Expandable Metallic Stents , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disability Evaluation , Esophageal Neoplasms/complications , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Treatment Outcome
20.
Oncol Res Treat ; 43(1-2): 34-41, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31639800

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Esophageal fistula is a critical and fatal complication of esophageal cancer. The aim of this meta-analysis was to explore the risk factors for esophageal perforation in esophageal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. METHODS: Data from the PubMed and Embase databases were retrieved for clinical research published between 1990 and 2018. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the articles. A meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration Network. RESULTS: Seventeen articles were eligible for the meta-analysis. In these articles, over 35 risk factors for esophageal fistula formation were described and 17 risk factors were analyzed. Significant differences in the odds of developing an esophageal perforation were found with regard to age (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.08-5.03, p = 0.001), ulcerative type (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.43-5.16, p = 0.002), histology (OR 4.16, 95% CI 1.14-15.12, p = 0.03), T stage (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.44-4.91, p = 0.002), short-term response (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.06-4.62, p = 0.03), chemotherapy regimen (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.38-5.68, p = 0.005), and stenosis (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.03-3.89, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: An age of <60-65 years, ulcerative type, squamous cell cancer, T4 stage, incomplete response, fluorouracil-based regimen, and stenosis were associated with an increased risk of esophageal fistula during or after radiotherapy. However, further, large-scale prospective studies are needed to establish the validity of this associ-ation.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Fistula/etiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/complications , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Age Factors , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Esophageal Fistula/diagnosis , Esophageal Fistula/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Odds Ratio , Radiotherapy/methods , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...