Covering of Plate after Anterior Cervical Fusion in Patients with Complete Spinal Cord Injury to Prevent Esophageal Injury: Technical Note.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal injury after anterior corpectomy and fusion is a rare but life-threatening complication. It may cause mediastinitis due to anatomical continuity between the retropharyngeal space and the mediastinum, with reported high mortality rates. The acute and subacute injuries are most commonly of iatrogenic origin, while late perforation has been described several weeks to years later as a result of continuous friction or pressure of the instruments against the posterior wall of the esophagus, leading to ischemia and necrosis. This phenomenon is more common among quadriplegic patients who have undergone corpectomy and insertion of expandable or mesh cages and plate probably due to chronic erosion by hardware at the supine position. METHODS: Since 2015, we have applied the technique of using a patch of autologous fascia lata to cover the anterior cervical plate by suturing to the longus colli muscles in 58 quadriplegic patients; the mean follow-up was 35.2 (28-41) months. RESULTS: Since we started using this procedure, based on our follow-up at our center, there have been no cases of late esophageal perforation among quadriplegic patients. CONCLUSION: As a technical note, it seems like this method would be able to reduce the prevalence of esophagus injury among quadriplegic patients. However, to substantiate the efficacy of this technique, long-term follow-up and larger sample size are needed because esophageal injury occurs rarely.

Esophageal injury associated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Determinants of risk and protective strategies.

Catheter ablation has become an important element in the management of atrial fibrillation. Several technical advances allowed for better safety profiles and lower recurrence rates, leading to an increasing number of ablations worldwide. Despite that, major complications are still reported, and esophageal thermal injury remains a significant concern as atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) is often fatal. Recognition of the mechanisms involved in the process of esophageal lesion formation and the identification of the main determinants of risk have set the grounds for the development and improvement of different esophageal protective strategies. More sensitive esophageal temperature monitoring, safer ablation parameters and catheters, and different energy sources appear to collectively reduce the risk of esophageal thermal injury. Adjunctive measures such as the prophylactic use of proton-pump inhibitors, as well as esophageal cooling or deviation devices, have emerged as complementary methods with variable but promising results. Nevertheless, as a multifactorial problem, no single esophageal protective measure has proven to be sufficiently effective to eliminate the risk, and further investigation is still warranted. Early screening in the patients at risk and prompt intervention in the cases of AEF are important risk modifiers and yield better outcomes.

Flexible versus rigid endoscopy in the management of esophageal foreign body impaction: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Foreign body (FB) impaction accounts for 4% of emergency endoscopies in clinical practice. Flexible endoscopy (FE) is recommended as the first-line therapeutic option because it can be performed under sedation, is cost-effective, and is well tolerated. Rigid endoscopy (RE) under general anesthesia is less used but may be advantageous in some circumstances. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of FE and RE in esophageal FB removal. Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were consulted matching the terms "Rigid endoscopy AND Flexible endoscopy AND foreign bod*". Pooled effect measures were calculated using an inverse-variance weighted or Mantel-Haenszel in random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 index and Cochrane Q test. Results: Five observational cohort studies, published between 1993 and 2015, matched the inclusion criteria. One thousand four hundred and two patients were included; FE was performed in 736 patients and RE in 666. Overall, 101 (7.2%) complications occurred. The most frequent complications were mucosal erosion (26.7%), mucosal edema (18.8%), and iatrogenic esophageal perforations (10.9%). Compared to FE, the estimated RE pooled success OR was 1.00 (95% CI 0.48-2.06; p = 1.00). The pooled OR of iatrogenic perforation, other complications, and overall complications were 2.87 (95% CI 0.96-8.61; p = 0.06), 1.09 (95% CI 0.38-3.18; p = 0.87), and 1.50 (95% CI 0.53-4.25; p = 0.44), respectively. There was no mortality. Conclusions: FE and RE are equally safe and effective for the removal of esophageal FB. To provide a tailored or crossover approach, patients should be managed in multidisciplinary centers where expertise in RE is also available. Formal training and certification in RE should probably be re-evaluated.

Regulating migration of esophageal stents - management using a Sengstaken-Blakemore tube: A case report and review of literature.

Stent migration, which causes issues in stent therapy for esophageal perforations, can counteract the therapeutic effects and lead to complications. Therefore, techniques to regulate stent migration are important and lead to effective stent therapy. Here, in these cases, we placed a removable fully covered self-expandable metallic stent (FSEMS) in a 52-year-old man with suture failure after surgery to treat Boerhaave syndrome, and in a 53-year-old man with a perforation in the lower esophagus due to acute esophageal necrosis. At the same time, we nasally inserted a Sengstaken-Blakemore tube (SBT), passing it through the stent lumen. By inflating a gastric balloon, the lower end of the stent was supported. When the stent migration was confirmed, the gastric balloon was lifted slightly toward the oral side to correct the stent migration. In this manner, the therapy was completed for these two patients. Using a FSEMS and SBT is a therapeutic method for correcting stent migration and regulating the complete migration of the stent into the stomach without the patient undergoing endoscopic rearrangement of the stent. It was effective for positioning a stent crossing the esophagogastric junction.

Complications of endoscopic resection techniques for upper GI tract lesions.

Adverse events can occur during and after the endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal lesions. Their incidence can be minimized through the adoption of preventive measures and their final outcomes can be optimized through prompt identification and adequate treatment. In this evidence-based review we describe the risk factors for adverse events, preventive measures to avoid them and their management when they occur. Algorithms of action are also provided. Oesophageal strictures can be prevented with corticosteroids (either locally injected or systemically administered) and treated with endoscopic dilatation. Bleeding can be minimized through the adoption of prophylactic coagulation and novel preventive measures are emerging and being evaluated. Bleeding management includes coagulation therapy, clips and haemostatic powders. Perforations can nowadays be successfully treated endoscopically in the majority of the cases and conservative treatment is associated with favourable outcomes although optimal management is unclear.

Trans-Balloon Visualisation During Dilatation (TBVD) of Oesophageal Strictures: a Novel Innovation.

BACKGROUND: Hydrostatic balloon dilatation of upper gastrointestinal strictures is associated with a risk of perforation that varies with the underlying pathology and with the technique employed. We present a technique of trans-balloon visualisation of the stricture during dilatation (TBVD) that allows direct 'real-time' observation of the effect of dilatation on the stricture, facilitating early recognition of mucosal abruption, thereby reducing the perforation rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 100 consecutive patients, undergoing balloon dilatation of oesophageal strictures between 1st of January 2011 and 1st of July 2014. RESULTS: One hundred patients underwent 186 dilatations, with 34 having multiple procedures (mean 1.86). All had oesophageal strictures (mean diameter 8.49 mm, range 5-11 mm) and most underwent dilatation up to a maximum of 17 mm (mean 14.7 mm). Fifty-six percent were male and the average age was 62.5 years (17-89 years). Only one patient (0.5% of all procedures) had a full-thickness perforation requiring intervention while just one further patient had a deep mucosal tear that did not require intervention. CONCLUSIONS: TBVD is a safe technique with a short learning curve and is one of the important factors that allow potentially difficult dilatations to be performed safely with an exceptionally low rate of adverse events of less than 1%.

Avoiding and Managing Intraoperative Complications During Cervical Spine Surgery.

The incidence of intraoperative complications in cervical spine surgery is low. However, when they do occur, such complications have the potential for causing considerable morbidity and mortality. Spine surgeons should be familiar with methods of minimizing such complications. Furthermore, if they do occur, surgeons must be prepared to immediately treat each potential complication to reduce any associated morbidity.

Foregut and colonic perforations: practical measures to prevent and assess them.

Acute endoscopic perforations of the foregut and colon are rare but can have devastating consequences. There are several principles and practices that can lower the risk of perforation and guide the endoscopist in early assessment when they do occur. Mastery of these principles will lead to overall improved patient outcomes.

Esophageal ESD: technique and prevention of complications.

The advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the ability to achieve high R0 resection, providing low local recurrence rate. Esophageal ESD is technically more difficult than gastric ESD due to the narrower space of the esophagus for endoscopic maneuvers. Also, the risk of perforation is higher because of the thin muscle layer of the esophageal wall. Blind dissection should be avoided to prevent perforation. A clip with line method is useful to keep a good endoscopic view with countertraction. Only an operator who has adequate skill should perform esophageal ESD.

Antiplatelet drugs are a risk factor for esophageal mucosal injury.

BACKGROUND: In esophagus whether antiplatelet drugs, such as low-dose aspirin (LDA) and clopidogrel, induce mucosal injury by pH changes or by acid reflux is unclear. We designed to clarify which mechanism was responsible. METHODS: In study 1, 80 patients taking LDA and 80 age- and sex-matched subjects who underwent endoscopy for dyspeptic symptoms or for a health check-up were evaluated the endoscopic incidence of esophageal mucosal injury and severity. In study 2, 35 healthy subjects were treated with LDA 100 mg (regimen A), and then 20 randomly selected subjects were dosed clopidogrel 75 mg (regimen C), LDA/clopidogrel (regimen AC), or LDA/clopidogrel/rabeprazole 10 mg for 7 days. Subjects underwent endoscopy and 24-hour pH measurements on day 7. RESULTS: In study 1, the prevalence of esophageal injury in LDA patients was 40.0%, significantly higher than in non-LDA subjects (25.0%, p = 0.042). In study 2, significant increases in incidence of injury were observed with regimens A (45.8%) and AC (50.0%), but not with C (20.0%), on day 7. Among subjects in whom pH was >5.0 and <4.0 for less than 40% of time, none developed esophageal injury. CONCLUSIONS: LDA caused esophageal injury in half of patients and volunteers. Acid-inhibitory drugs effectively prevented the development of LDA-induced, not clopidogrel, esophageal injury.

Endoscopic resection (endoscopic mucosal resection/ endoscopic submucosal dissection) for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: current status of various techniques.

Endoscopic resection (ER) has been widely accepted as an effective and minimally invasive treatment for patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Techniques of conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) were first developed for ER. There are three representative methods of conventional EMR: endoscopic esophageal mucosal resection (EEMR)-tube method, EMR using a cap-fitted endoscope (EMRC) method and two-channel EMR method. In the past decade, techniques of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have become established as standard methods of ER. ESD allows en bloc resection of a lesion, irrespective of the size and shape of the lesion. Recently, results of retrospective cohort studies confirming that ESD is superior to EMR as a curative treatment for superficial esophageal SCC have been reported. Representative knives that are now frequently used in esophageal ESD include Hook knife, Triangle tip knife, IT knife nano, Flush knife-BT, Dual knife, SB knife, and so on. Although there are various knives developed for ESD, the basic techniques for safe and effective ESD are the same.

[Treatment of benign esophageal stricture].

The article presents an analysis of long-term experience of treatment of 128 patients with benign esophagus and esophageal anastomosis strictures in Kirov Military Medical Academy. This significant data included all possible variations of scarry esophageal strictures according their etiology, localization and the extension. The wide range of methods, which involved the different variants of bouginage, balloon dilation, stenting, electrosurgical dissection and resection of the stomach, were applied in treatment of the patients. The analysis of immediate and long-term results allowed detecting the criteria of choice and indication for use of the methods or their combination. Practical recommendations reflect the strategy of each variant of treatment and have the specific character. Possible complications and negative results of irrational application of different methods were presented. The immediate and long-term results gave evidence of the successful treatment of the patients with scarry esophagus and esophageal anastomosis strictures.

Management of gastrostomy to prevent perforation in acute severe corrosive esophagitis and gastritis: an experimental study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Symptomatic treatment is still the most commonly preferred treatment modality for acute severe esophagitis and gastritis. Clinical results of this treatment range from pathologies like stricture formation to loss of life. In our study, we aimed to demonstrate the effect of immediate gastrostomy in preventing perforation due to corrosive trauma. METHODS: We used 32 rats in two study groups. In Group I (n: 16 rats), 1 ml of corrosive agent (10% NaOH solution) was administered and immediate gastrostomies were performed within 2 hours. In Group II (n: 16 rats), 1 ml corrosive agent (10% NaOH solution) was administered and the rats were treated symptomatically; no operation was performed. RESULTS: Acute death was observed in 5 rats just after the corrosive agent was administered at the beginning of the study. Three rats from Group II died due to esophageal and gastric perforation within one week (25%). Necrosis was reported in 5 non-gastrostomized rats; however, no necrosis was observed in the gastrostomized group (p=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Severe acute corrosive esophagitis and gastritis may be fatal. Furthermore, survivors may suffer from lifelong associated problems. From this study, we concluded that immediate gastrostomy in acute corrosive esophagitis and gastritis may play an important role in preventing necrosis and perforation risk.

[Esophageal perforation following a biopsy in a patient with eosinophilic esophagitis]. / Perforación esofágica tras biopsia en paciente con esofagitis eosinofílica.

Eosinophilic esophagitis is an underdiagnosed disease that should be suspected in all patients with dysphagia and food impaction. Although these are the leading symptoms, the clinical and endoscopic spectrum is highly varied. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of endoscopy-related complications in this disorder. Precautions should be maximized in endoscopic examinations to avoid iatrogenic damage. We describe the case of a young patient with esophageal stricture and dysphagia who suffered a perforation following a biopsy.

[Complications of endoscopy in children]. / Powiklania endoskopowego badania przewodu pokarmowego u dzieci.

Endoscopic examination is a valuable procedure both in the diagnostics and in the treatment of alimentary tract diseases. It is usually safe, however, it is invasive and therefore burdened by complications risk, particularly when it is performed as a therapeutic procedure. Taking into consideration the causative agent, complications of endoscopy can be divided into these occurring already before examination being the result of preparation to the examination and directly connected with the procedure of examination. The occurrence of complication may require other, additional diagnostic procedures, treatment including surgical, moreover it can be a cause of patient death. The prevention of complications of endoscopy includes proper qualification to the examination, detailed history of concomitant diseases, proper preparation for the examinations, experienced staff conducting the examination and proper technical setting.