Hypopharyngeal-Esophageal Impedance-pH Monitoring Profiles of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the profile of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) at hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (HEMII-pH) monitoring and the relationship between hypopharyngeal-proximal reflux episodes (HREs) and saliva pepsin concentration. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective non-controlled. METHODS: Patients were recruited from three European hospitals from January 2018 to October 2019. Patients benefited from HEMII-pH monitoring and saliva collections to measure saliva pepsin concentration in the same time. Saliva pepsin concentration was measured in the morning (fasting), after lunch, and after dinner. The LPR profile of patients was studied through a breakdown of the HEMII-pH findings over the 24 hours of testing. The relationship between the concentrations of saliva pepsin and 24-hour HREs was studied through linear multiple regression. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six patients completed the study. The HEMII-pH analyses revealed that 73.99% of HREs occurred outside 1-hour postmeal times, whereas 20.49% and 5.52% of HREs occurred during the 1-hour postmeal and nighttime, respectively. Seventy-four patients (58.73%) did not have nighttime HREs. Patients with both daytime and nighttime HREs had more severe HEMII-pH parameters and reflux symptom score compared with patients with only daytime HREs. There were no significant associations between HREs and saliva pepsin concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike gastroesophageal reflux disease, HREs occur less frequently after meals and nighttime. The analysis of the HEMII-pH profile of the LPR patients has to be considered to develop future personalized therapeutic strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:268-276, 2021.

Plasma dosage of ghrelin, IGF-1, GLP- 1 and leptin related to gastric emptying and esophageal pH-impedance in children with obesity.

PURPOSE: The main aim of the study was to assess the relationship between leptin, ghrelin, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) blood levels and gastric motility in children with obesity compared to healthy children. Secondary aims were to assess the possible association between these hormones and obesity, reflux impedance parameters, reflux symptoms, other GI disorders, and quality-of-life scores within the same groups. METHODS: Children with obesity plus GERD symptoms and 2 control groups of children with obesity without GERD and healthy lean children aged 4-17 years underwent an auxological evaluation, an assessment of gastro-intestinal symptoms and quality of life, hormonal dosages, and an evaluation of gastric emptying time (GET) through 13C-octanoic acid breath test. RESULTS: No significant association was found between hormones and gastric motility. Leptin and ghrelin levels were significantly associated with obesity parameters. No significant differences were found between GET and hormones of the patients with obesity, either with or without GERD. CONCLUSION: Although we found an association between auxological parameters and both leptin and ghrelin levels, this association did not imply an effect on the upper GI motility. Therefore, our hypothesis that alterations of these hormones in children with obesity could affect gastric emptying, triggering GERD, was not supported by our data.

Optimization of impedance-measured reflux events in GORD utilizing acid exposure time.

BACKGROUND: Combining impedance with pH monitoring improves the detection and characterization of gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR), yet the two modalities frequently differ in GOR quantification. Ambulatory 24-h pH-impedance monitoring often reveals more significant oesophageal acid exposure than impedance-measured reflux activity in patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). The purpose of this study is to elucidate the discrepancies between these modalities by assessing the predictive accuracy of impedance compared to acid exposure standards. METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective review of sequential 24-h pH-impedance results of 72 patients with symptomatic GOR off anti-secretory therapy was conducted. Reflux events measured by impedance were stratified by patient position and compared to oesophageal acid exposure time (AET). Oesophageal AET limits for GORD detection were utilized as gold standards to generate serial receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves to assess the sensitivity and specificity of current impedance GORD detection limits and identify optimized impedance standards based on area under the curve (AUC) analysis. RESULTS: Mean total AET time was 10.5% (± 9.9%), and 63.8% of patients had elevated AET. By impedance, median GOR frequency was 43 (IQR 21-68), and 22.2% exceeded conventional GOR frequency limits of normal. ROC curve analysis revealed the current impedance standard of > 73 GOR events has a sensitivity of 32.6% and specificity of 96.5% (AUC 0.74) for GORD detection. By AUC analysis, an impedance threshold of > 41 GOR events is optimal for GORD detection (sensitivity 69.6%, specificity 80.7%, AUC 0.83). CONCLUSION: Conventional impedance standards for abnormal GOR frequency are weakly sensitive for the detection of GORD, providing a possible explanation to discrepancies in AET and impedance interpretation. Lowering impedance-measured GOR frequency limits to > 41 optimizes sensitivity and specificity while increasing congruence between pH and impedance metrics.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy is a safe and effective treatment modality for geriatric patients with achalasia.

BACKGROUND: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an appealing treatment for older patients, as it is minimally invasive but highly efficacious similar to surgical myotomy. However, there is a lack of systematic studies analyzing POEM outcomes in young (< 65 years) versus geriatric patients (≥ 65 years). Hence, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of POEM in young versus geriatric patients. METHODS: Records of all achalasia patients who underwent POEM at our institution between April 2014 and May 2019 were reviewed. Patients were categorized into two groups: young (< 65 years) and old (≥ 65 years). Demographic and procedural details, timed barium esophagram (TBE), high-resolution manometry (HREM), pH study findings and Eckardt scores were compared between the two groups. Post-POEM Eckhardt score of ≤ 3 was defined as treatment success. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients met the study criteria (young = 93; old = 55). Younger patients were more likely to have lower TBE height at 1 min but wider TBE width at 5 min. The rest of the pre-operative parameters and Eckardt scores were similar in the two groups. Young patients were more likely to have undergone prior Heller myotomy, while Botox injections were common in the older group. The operative details and outcomes were similar in the two groups. Treatment success rates were similar in both groups (94.9% young vs. 94.7% in old patients, p = 1.00). At 2-month follow-up, both groups showed significant improvements in Eckhardt scores and HREM parameters; however, older patients showed greater improvement in TBE height at 1 and 5 min. The rates of symptomatic GERD and abnormal esophageal pH study findings were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: POEM was safe and highly effective treatment for geriatric patients with achalasia. These findings suggest that POEM might emerge as the preferred approach for myotomy in this patient population.

Predictors of reflux aspiration and laryngo-pharyngeal reflux.

BACKGROUND: Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) can present with typical or atypical or laryngo-pharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms. Pulmonary aspiration of gastric refluxate is one of the most serious variants of reflux disease as its complications are difficult to diagnose and treat. The aim of this study was to establish predictors of pulmonary aspiration and LPR symptoms. METHODS: Records of 361 consecutive patient from a prospectively populated database were analyzed. Patients were categorized by symptom profile as predominantly LPR or GERD (98 GER and 263 LPR). Presenting symptom profile, pH studies, esophageal manometry and scintigraphy and the relationships were analyzed. RESULTS: Severe esophageal dysmotility was significantly more common in the LPR group (p = 0.037). Severe esophageal dysmotility was strongly associated with isotope aspiration in all patients (p = 0.001). Pulmonary aspiration on scintigraphy was present in 24% of patients. Significant correlation was established between total proximal acid on 24-h pH monitoring and isotope aspiration in both groups (p < 0.01). Rising pharyngeal curves on scintigraphy were the strongest predictors of isotope aspiration (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Severe esophageal dysmotility correlates with LPR symptoms and reflux aspiration in LPR and GERD. Abnormal proximal acid score on 24-h pH monitoring associated with pulmonary aspiration in reflux patients. Pharyngeal contamination on scintigraphy was the strongest predictor of pulmonary aspiration.

Esophageal Manometry, pH Testing, Endoscopy, and Videofluoroscopy in Patients With Globus Sensation.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Combine techniques commonly employed in the clinical workup of patients with isolated globus sensation to identify the most common pharyngoesophageal abnormality. The primary aim was to retrospectively review high-resolution manometry, pH probe testing, contrast videofluoroscopy, and endoscopy studies in patients with a primary complaint of globus sensation. The specific hypothesis was esophageal high-resolution manometry identifies the most significant proportion of abnormalities compared to all other modalities. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: An inclusive retrospective chart review was performed for patients evaluated between 2009 and 2016 with the primary complaint of globus sensation. Age at testing, self-identified gender, associated diagnoses, and results from each modality were collected. Descriptive statistics and pairwise comparisons were performed as well as sensitivity and specificity calculations. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-two patients met inclusion criteria. The cohort had an age range of 22.7 to 88.5 years and was predominantly female. Esophageal manometry identified abnormalities in 62.8% of patients, and pH testing identified abnormal acidification in approximately 20%. The esophagram identified abnormalities in 24% of patients, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy identified abnormalities in 22%. Modified barium swallows were normal in 93% of patients. Measures of sensitivity and specificity of other modalities were poor compared to esophageal manometry and pH testing. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with isolated globus sensation have evidence of esophageal dysmotility and laryngopharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux disease in high proportions. Esophageal high-resolution manometry testing identifies the greatest proportion of abnormalities of the investigated modalities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:2120-2125, 2020.

Abnormal 24-hour pH-impedance Testing Does Not Predict Reduced Quality of Life in Children With Reflux Symptoms.

OBJECTIVES: Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) have been associated with reduced health-related quality of life (QOL) in children, though it is unclear whether reflux burden on objective diagnostic testing, such as 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance with pH (pH-MII) is associated with impaired QOL in children. Our aim was to identify predictors of QOL impairment based on the results of esophageal reflux testing. METHODS: In this prospective, cross-sectional study of children undergoing pH-MII and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for evaluation of suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease, we collected validated questionnaires (Pediatric Gastroesophageal Symptom and Quality of Life Questionnaire [PGSQ], Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 [PedsQL] and PedsQL Gastrointestinal Symptoms Module [GI PedsQL]) to determine the relationship between objective measures of GER, patient-reported symptoms and QOL outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 82 subjects, 38% of children had an abnormal pH-MII study. There were no significant differences in QOL scores on any questionnaire between patients with normal and abnormal pH-MII studies (P > 0.11). There was no correlation between individual pH-MII parameters and QOL scores. Subjects with gross esophagitis on EGD reported significantly worse QOL with lower total PedsQL (P = 0.002) and GI PedsQL (P = 0.03) scores. Microscopic esophagitis was not associated with differences in QOL scores (P > 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: There was no relationship between abnormalities on pH-MII testing and reduced QOL in children. These findings highlight the importance of considering other diagnoses beyond GERD as they may be significant drivers for QOL impairment.

Validity and Reliability of the Reflux Sign Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate the Reflux Sign Assessment (RSA), a clinical instrument evaluating the physical findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). METHODS: A total of 106 patients completed a 3-month treatment based on the association of diet, pantoprazole, alginate, or magaldrate with the LPR characteristics (acid, nonacid, mixed). Forty-two asymptomatic individuals completed the study (control group). The RSA results and reflux finding score (RFS) were documented for the LPR patients at baseline and after treatment. Intrarater reliability was assessed through a test-retest blinded evaluation of signs (7-day intervals). Interrater reliability was assessed by comparing the RSA evaluations of three blinded otolaryngologists through Kendall's W. Responsiveness to change was evaluated through a comparison of the baseline and 3-month posttreatment findings. The RSA cutoffs for determining the presence and absence of LPR were examined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 102 LPR patients completed the study (68 females). The mean age was 53 years. The mean RSA at baseline was 25.95 ± 9.58; it significantly improved to 18.96 ± 7.58 after 3 months of therapy (P < .001). RSA exhibited good intra- (r = 0.813) and interrater (Kendall's W = 0.663) reliabilities (N = 56). There was no significant association between the RSA, gastrointestinal endoscopy findings, and the types of reflux (acid, nonacid, or mixed) according to impedance-pH monitoring. An RSA >14 may be suggestive of LPR. CONCLUSION: The RSA is a complete clinical instrument evaluating both laryngeal and extralaryngeal findings associated with LPR. The RSA demonstrated high intra- and interrater reliabilities and responsiveness to change.

Feasibility of the peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) procedure with a new small-caliber endoscope (thin-POEM) in patients with achalasia.

BACKGROUND: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a recognized technique for patients with achalasia. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using a small-caliber endoscope (thin-POEM) to perform POEM in patients with achalasia. METHODS: Naïve or previously treated patients were included between February 2016 and April 2018. A small-caliber (5.9 mm) nasoendoscope was used, with a modified closure method using cyanoacrylate. Strict follow-up was performed. RESULTS: 45 patients were included, aged 45.5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 22 - 69); 53 % (24/45) had type II achalasia. Median total time for thin-POEM was 54 minutes (IQR 37 - 77) and median myotomy length was 13.5 cm (IQR 6 - 20). Results pre-procedure and 3 months post were Eckardt score 10 vs. 1 (P < 0.001), integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) 25.3 vs. 8.5 mmHg (P < 0.001), and timed barium esophagram (TBE) 100 % severely delayed vs. 86 % normal (P < 0.001), respectively. Type III patients had the longest thin-POEM times (median 58 minutes [IQR 52 - 77]). Reflux was confirmed at 3 months clinically in 17 % of patients, endoscopically in 20 %, and on pH monitoring in 53 %. At 6 months and 12 months, 40 % and 33 % of patients remained positive on pH monitoring and were medically managed. CONCLUSIONS: Thin-POEM seems to be a safe, effective, and efficient procedure for POEM in patients with achalasia, with good short-term follow-up results.

Trajectory assessment is useful when day-to-day esophageal acid exposure varies in prolonged wireless pH monitoring.

Acid exposure time commonly varies from day-to-day in prolonged wireless pH monitoring. Thus, diagnosis based on the number of days with abnormal acid burden may be misleading or inconclusive. We hypothesize that assessing longitudinal patterns of acid exposure may be diagnostically useful. Therefore, this study aims to describe acid exposure trajectories and evaluate agreement between identified trajectory patterns and conventional grouping. In this retrospective cohort study, we assessed patients with nonresponse to proton pump inhibitor therapy who underwent wireless pH monitoring (≥72 h) off therapy between August 2010 and September 2016. The primary outcome was esophageal acid exposure time. Subjects were grouped as 0, 1, 2, and 3+ days positive based on number of days with an acid exposure time >5.0%. Latent class group-based mixture model identified distinct longitudinal acid exposure trajectory groups. Of 212 subjects included 44%, 18%, 14%, and 24% had 0, 1, 2, 3+ days positive, respectively. Group-based modeling identified three significantly stable acid exposure trajectories: low (64%), middle (28%), and high (8%). Trajectory grouping and days positive grouping agreed substantially (weighted K 0.69; 95% CI: 0.63-0.76). Trajectory grouping identified 62% of subjects with conventionally inconclusive studies (one or two days positive) into the low trajectory. Agreement between trajectory groups when using three versus four days of monitoring was substantial (K 0.70; CI: 0.61-0.78). In summary, we found that patients with nonresponse to proton pump inhibitors follow three acid exposure trajectories over prolonged pH-monitoring periods: low, middle, and high. Compared to conventional day positive grouping, the trajectory modeling identified the majority of inconclusive days positive into the low trajectory group. Analyzing prolonged wireless pH data according to trajectories may be a complimentary method to conventional grouping, and may increase precision and accuracy in identifying acid burden.

The Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Patients With Excessive Central Airway Collapse.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is increasingly recognized as an exacerbating or causal factor in several respiratory diseases. There is a high prevalence of GER in infants with airway malacia. However, such data are lacking in adults. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted to determine the relationship between GER and excessive central airway collapse (ECAC). The study included consecutive patients with ECAC referred to the Complex Airway Center at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center who underwent esophageal pH testing for GER between July 2014 and June 2018. RESULTS: Sixty-three of 139 patients with ECAC (45.3%) had documented GER as shown by an abnormal esophageal pH test result. The mean DeMeester score was 32.2, with a symptom association probability of 39.7% of GER-positive patients. Twenty-nine of 63 patients (46%) with GER reported improvement in respiratory symptoms following maximal medical therapy or antireflux surgery without requiring further treatment for ECAC. CONCLUSIONS: GER is prevalent among patients with ECAC, and aggressive reflux treatment should be considered in these patients prior to considering invasive airway procedures or surgery.

Model to Select On-Therapy vs Off-Therapy Tests for Patients With Refractory Esophageal or Extraesophageal Symptoms.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It is not clear whether we should test for reflux in patients with refractory heartburn or extraesophageal reflux (EER) symptoms, such as cough, hoarseness, or asthma. Guidelines recommend testing patients by pH monitoring when they are on or off acid-suppressive therapies based on pretest probability of reflux, determined by expert consensus. However, it is not clear what constitutes a low or high pretest probability of reflux in these patients. We aimed to develop a model that clinicians can use at bedside to estimate pretest probability of abnormal reflux. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 471 adult patients with refractory heartburn (n = 214) or suspected EER symptoms (n = 257) who underwent endoscopy with wireless pH monitoring while they were off acid-suppressive treatment and assigned them to groups based on symptoms at presentation (discovery cohort). Using data from the discovery cohort, we performed proportional odds ordinal logistic regression to select factors (easy to obtain demographic criteria and clinical symptoms such as heartburn, regurgitation, asthma, cough, and hoarseness) associated with esophageal exposure to acid. We validated our findings in a cohort of 118 patients with the same features from 2 separate tertiary care centers (62% women; median age 59 years; 62% with cough as presenting symptom). RESULTS: Abnormal pH (>5.5% of time spent at pH <4) was found in 56% of patients with heartburn and 63% of patients with EER (P = .15). Within EER groups, abnormal pH was detected in a significantly larger proportion (80%) of patients with asthma compared with patients with cough (60%) or hoarseness (51%; P < .01). Factors significantly associated with abnormal pH in patients with heartburn were presence of hiatal hernia and body mass index >25 kg/m2. In patients with EER, the risk of reflux was independently associated with the presence of concomitant heartburn (odds ratio [OR] 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-3.1), body mass index >25 kg/m2 (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.5-3.1), asthma (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.2-3.5), and presence of hiatal hernia (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.2-3.1). When we used these factors to create a scoring system, we found that a score of ≤2 excluded patients with moderate to severe reflux, with a negative predictive value of 80% in the discovery cohort and a negative predictive value of 85% in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: We developed a clinical model to estimate pretest probability of abnormal pH in patients who were failed by proton pump inhibitor therapy. This system can help guide clinicians at bedside in determining the most appropriate diagnostic test in this challenging group of patients.

Simultaneous laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring (Restech) and conventional esophageal pH monitoring-correlation using a large patient cohort of more than 100 patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease.

24-hour esophageal pH-metry is not designed to detect laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). The new laryngopharyngeal pH-monitoring system (Restech) may detect LPR better. There is no established correlation between these two techniques as only small case series exist. The aim of this study is to examine the correlation between the two techniques with a large patient cohort. All patients received a complete diagnostic workup for gastroesophageal reflux including symptom evaluation, endoscopy, 24-hour pH-metry, high resolution manometry, and Restech. Consecutive patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux and disease-related extra-esophageal symptoms were evaluated using 24-hour laryngopharyngeal and concomitant esophageal pH-monitoring. Subsequently, the relationship between the two techniques was evaluated subdividing the different reflux scenarios into four groups. A total of 101 patients from December 2013 to February 2017 were included. All patients presented extra-esophageal symptoms such as cough, hoarseness, asthma symptoms, and globus sensation. Classical reflux symptoms such as heartburn (71%), regurgitation (60%), retrosternal pain (54%), and dysphagia (32%) were also present. Esophageal 24-hour pH-metry was positive in 66 patients (65%) with a mean DeMeester Score of 66.7 [15-292]. Four different reflux scenarios were detected (group A-D): in 39% of patients with abnormal esophageal pH-metry, Restech evaluation was normal (group A, n = 26, mean DeMeester-score = 57.9 [15-255], mean Ryan score = 2.6 [2-8]). In 23% of patients with normal pH-metry (n = 8, group B), Restech evaluation was abnormal (mean DeMeester-score 10.5 [5-13], mean Ryan score 63.5 [27-84]). The remaining groups C and D showed corresponding results. Restech evaluation was positive in 48% of cases in this highly selective patient cohort. As demonstrated by four reflux scenarios, esophageal pH-metry and Restech do not necessarily need to correspond. Especially in patients with borderline abnormal 24-hour pH-metry, Restech may help to support the decision for or against laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery.

A systematic review with meta-analysis of the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in congenital diaphragmatic hernia pediatric survivors.

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia survivors are a well-known group at risk for developing gastroesophageal reflux disease that may be particularly long-term severe. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic review of the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in infant and children survivors treated for congenital diaphragmatic hernia.Electronic and manual searches were performed with keywords related to congenital diaphragmatic hernia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and epidemiology terms. Summary estimates of the prevalence were calculated. Effect model was chosen depending on heterogeneity (I2). Factors potentially related with the prevalence, including study quality or the diagnostic strategy followed, were assessed by subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Risk of publication bias was studied by funnel plot analysis and the Egger test.The search yielded 140 articles, 26 of which were included in the analyses and provided 34 estimates of prevalence: 21 in patients aged 12 months or younger, and 13 in older children. The overall prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in infants was 52.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 43.2% to 62.1%, I2 = 88.7%) and, in children over 1 year old, 35.1% (95% CI: 25.4% to 45.3%, I2 = 73.5%). Significant clinical and statistical heterogeneity was found. The strategy chosen for gastroesophageal reflux diagnosis influenced the reported prevalence. The only estimate obtained with a systematic use of multichannel intraluminal impedance provided a higher prevalence in both age groups: 83.3% (95% CI: 67.2% to 93.6%) and 61.1% (95% CI: 43.5% to 76.9%) respectively. This last prevalence did not significantly differ from that obtained using only low risk of bias estimates.As a conclusion, gastroesophageal reflux disease is commonly observed after congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair and is almost constantly present in the first months of life. It may be underdiagnosed if systematically esophageal monitoring is not performed. This should be considered when proposing follow-up and management protocols for congenital diaphragmatic hernia survivors.

Diet affects reflux in a rural African community.

Reflux in this region of South Africa is known to be more frequent and less acidic than in other countries. We investigated the relationship between reflux and diet. We recruited 57 healthy participants. We carried out ambulant oesophageal pH-impedance monitoring for 24 hours. We used software and visual review to analyse data and to identify episodes of reflux and rapid alkaline rises in the stomach. A usual pattern diet questionnaire provided data on frequency of consumption of common foods. Associations between reflux, gastric pH and dietary components were sought using analysis of variance, and regression analyses. Diet was strongly based on maize. Protein was principally from milk, eggs, chicken and beans. Fat was principally from cooking oil. Fruit and vegetables were consumed moderately frequently. Milk consumption was associated with an increase in total reflux (P = .022), weakly acid reflux (P = 0.015) and supine reflux (P = 0.001), and a decrease in the time that gastric pH was higher than 4 (P = 0.030). Fat was associated with an increase in acid reflux (P = 0.046) and a decrease in time that gastric pH was higher than 4 (P = 0.005). Fruit consumption was associated with increases in liquid-only refluxes(P = 0.007), and upright refluxes (P = 0.048). Maize meal was associated with a reduction in rapid alkaline rises in the gastric lumen (P = 0.015). Diet significantly affects reflux in this community. What is normal in apparently healthy people in various parts of the world differs significantly.

Esophageal function tests are not helpful in symptoms suspicious of extraesophageal reflux - a prospective study in 74 patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Symptoms suspicious of extraesophageal reflux (SSEER) include globus, chronic cough, mucous obstruction and hoarseness. Reports of conventional esophageal function tests and measurement of extraesophageal reflux (EER) in these patients are spare providing conflicting results. METHODS: In a prospective study we evaluated 60 patients with SSEER by esophageal function tests (esophageal manometry, combined 24 h pH - metry - impedance and oropharyngeal pH measurement, Dx - pH measurement) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The patients were stratified into 2 groups according to their accompanying reflux symptoms. Group 1, n = 23, comprised patients with SSEER solely and group 2, n = 37 patients with SSEER and reflux symptoms. The patients were compared to patients with reflux symptoms solely (group 3, n = 14). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups according to age, sex and BMI. Patients with SSEER and reflux symptoms (group 2) showed significantly increased proportion of pathological acid reflux, de Meester Score, pH < 4 overall and in upright positon and hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter pressure compared to patients with SSEER solely (group 1) but no significant difference to patients with reflux symptoms solely (group 3). All the other parameters of esophageal testing including non-acid reflux and EER were not significantly different between the three groups. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study do not support a causal link between SSEER and esophageal motility disorders, acid or non-acid reflux and EER as measured by conventional esophageal function tests and oropharyngeal pH measurement.

Continuous 48-Hour Wireless Esophageal pH Monitoring in Children: Comparison Between Days 1 and 2.

AIM: Comparison of days 1 and 2 to each other and to the total recording of 48 hours in continuous 48-hour wireless esophageal pH monitoring in children. METHODS: A retrospective study of 105 patients who underwent 48-hour pH monitoring (Bravo) studies between January 1992 and June 2010 was performed. Reflux variables were compared between days 1 and 2. RESULTS: A total of 58 (55.2%) patients were men. The number of reflux episodes, number of long reflux >5 minutes, duration of the longest reflux (minutes), time pH <4 (minutes), fraction time pH <4 supine (%), fraction time pH <4 upright (%), reflux index, and DeMeester score did not differ between days 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: No effect of anesthesia was observed on the gastroesophageal reflux parameters on children.

Reflux characteristics of 113 GERD patients with abnormal 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH tests.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze reflux parameters by means of combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH (MII-pH) monitoring in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms off medication, and to find the reflux characteristics of Chinese GERD patients and the influences of gender, age, body posture, and body mass index (BMI) on gastroesophageal reflux (GER). METHODS: Between Dec. 2008 and May 2014, 125 patients with typical GERD symptoms were subjected to 24-h MII-pH monitoring. Twelve patients with normal MII-pH profiles were not considered for analysis. The reflux parameters of 113 GERD patients with abnormal MII-pH results were analyzed. RESULTS: (1) DeMeester scores were above the normal range in 46.90% (53/113) of GERD patients. Weakly acidic refluxes were prevalent in GERD patients, and the frequency of abnormal weakly acidic reflux was 75.22% (85/113). The frequencies of abnormal symptom index (SI) and symptom association probability (SAP) were 19.47% (22/113) and 14.16% (16/113), respectively. (2) The frequencies of DeMeester scores, the %time at pH<4, and the numbers of reflux episodes and of long reflux episodes >5 min were significantly higher in male patients than in female patients. (3) The %time at pH<4 was much higher during upright periods than during supine periods. During supine periods, 31.86% (36/113) of GERD patients had delayed bolus clearance time, compared with 19.47% (22/113) during upright periods. (4) The number of abnormal DeMeester scores, %time at pH<4, and the number of acid refluxes during upright periods were significantly higher in obese GERD patients than in GERD patients with a normal BMI. Overweight GERD patients also had many more acid refluxes during upright periods than GERD patients with a normal BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Weakly acidic refluxes were prevalent in Chinese GERD patients. The factors male, gender, upright position, obesity (BMI≥25), but not age, may increase the frequency and severity of GER.

Changing Patterns in Reflux Care: 10-Year Comparison of ABEA Members.

OBJECTIVES: To compare patterns of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) diagnosis and management over time by American Broncho-Esophagological Association (ABEA) members. METHODS: American Broncho-Esophagological Association members completed an online questionnaire focused on LPR evaluation and management in 2012; responses were compared to a 2002 survey. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-six members were emailed, of whom 63 (14.8%) responded. In both time periods, throat clearing, heartburn, globus, arytenoid edema, and erythema were considered highly related to LPR. Management in 2012 differed as respondents more commonly treated LPR empirically (82.6% vs 56.3%, P = .036). When adjunctive testing was ordered, dual pH probe were less frequently utilized in 2012 (61.5% vs 78.3%, P = .029). Either esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) or transnasal esophagoscopy (TNE) was used more often in 2012 compared to EGD alone in 2002 (63.8% vs 42.4%, P = .020). Dual pH probe was regarded as the most sensitive and specific evaluation for LPR in both surveys, while the perceived sensitivity/specificity of EGD in 2012 was half that reported in 2002 (28.0% vs 56.3%, P = .003). CONCLUSION: Attitudes of ABEA members toward empiric treatment and adjunctive tests have changed between 2012 and 2002. While pH probe testing remains the test regarded as most sensitive/specific for evaluation of LPR, empiric management has become more common. Meanwhile, EGD use has increased despite a significant decrease in its perceived sensitivity/specificity.

Proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia: a historical perspective on a novel and evolving entity / Esofagitis eosinofílica respondedora a los inhibidores de la bomba de protones: perspectiva histórica sobre una entidad nueva y en desarrollo

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an emerging chronic esophageal disease, first described in 1993, with a steadily increasing incidence and prevalence in western countries. Over the 80´s and early 90´s, dense esophageal eosinophilia was mostly associated gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). For the next 15 years, EoE and GERD were rigidly considered separate entities: Esophageal eosinophilia with pathological acid exposure on pH monitoring or response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy was GERD, whereas normal pH monitoring or absence of response to PPIs was EoE. Updated guidelines in 2011 described a novel phenotype, proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia (PPI-REE), referring to patients who appear to have EoE clinically, but who achieve complete remission after PPI therapy. Currently, PPI-REE must be formally excluded before diagnosing EoE, since 30-40 % of patients with suspected EoE are eventually diagnosed with PPI-REE. Interestingly, PPI-REE and EoE remain undistinguishable based on clinical, endoscopic, and histological findings, pH monitoring, and measurement of tissue markers and cytokines related to eosinophilic inflammation. This review article aims to revisit the relatively novel concept of PPI-REE from a historical perspective, given the strong belief that only GERD, as an acid peptic disorder, could respond to the acid suppressing ability of PPI therapy, is becoming outdated. Evolving evidence suggests that PPI-REE is genetically and phenotypically undistinguishable from EoE and PPI therapy alone can almost completely reverse allergic inflammation. As such, PPI-REE might constitute a subphenotype of EoE and PPI therapy may be the first therapeutic step and diet/ steroids may represent step up therapy. Possibly, the term PPI-REE will be soon replaced by PPIresponsive EoE. The mechanism as to why some patients respond to PPI therapy (PPI-REE) while others do not (EoE), remains to be elucidated