ABSTRACT
A rare neuroendocrine skin cancer called Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) primarily affects elderly people. The objective of this study is to comprehensively review the impact of immunosuppressive medications, particularly TNF inhibitors, on the emergence of MCC. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library were searched. Study articles were screened by title and abstract at Rayyan Qatar Computing Research Institute, then a full-text assessment was implemented. RESULTS: A total of eight case reports with 9 patients were included. Of the total population, seven were women and only two were men. Their age ranged from 31 to 73 years. More than half the population (5 cases) were being treated for rheumatoid arthritis. All received TNF inhibitors that were associated with the induction of MCC. CONCLUSION: We found that it is essential for physicians to explain potential cancer risks to patients before starting long-term immunosuppressive therapy and to conduct routine checks for MCC and other side effects. TNF inhibitors (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, and golimumab) were all associated with MCC development. Women constituted the majority of cases and most were elderly.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Merkel Cell , Etanercept , Skin Neoplasms , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors , Humans , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/chemically induced , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/chemically induced , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/adverse effects , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Etanercept/adverse effects , Aged , Female , Male , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Infliximab/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Adalimumab/adverse effects , Adult , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The objective of this phase III clinical randomized trial was to establish the therapeutic equivalence of biosimilar etanercept (bio-etanercept) with original etanercept (O-etanercept) for patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: The study (NCT04079374) enrolled patients with moderate to high disease activity rheumatoid arthritis. Enrolled patients were randomized 1:1 into 2 treatment groups, 1 receiving bio-etanercept (study drug) and the other receiving O-etanercept (comparator) at a dose of 25mg twice weekly, for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of patients with an ACR20 response after 24 weeks of treatment. Safety (adverse reaction/adverse event) and immunogenicity of both drugs were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 156 patients (79 in the bio-etanercept group and 77 in the O-etanercept group) who completed 24-week treatment and 4-week follow-up, 82.3% (65 patients) and 90.9% (70 patients) achieved an ACR20 response in the bio-etanercept and O-etanercept groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (Pâ =â .16). No significant differences in the occurrence of adverse reactions/adverse events were found between the 2 groups regardless of severity (Pâ =â .63 for mild, Pâ =â .43 for moderate and Pâ >â .99 for severe). The development of antibodies in the bio-etanercept group was observed in 4 (5.1%; visit 6), 4 (5.0%; visit 9), and 3 (3.8%; visit 11) patients, and in 5 (6.4%), 5 (6.5%), and 3 (4.1%) patients in the O-etanercept group. The differences between the 2 groups were not significant (Pâ >â .99). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that bio-etanercept was equivalent to the reference formulation.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals , Etanercept , Humans , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Etanercept/adverse effects , Etanercept/administration & dosage , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Aged , Therapeutic EquivalencyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although biologic agents are very effective, long-term comparative studies demonstrating their safety relative to one another are still lacking. METHODS: A total of 124 patients with psoriasis were followed up for 30 months; 74 received anti-TNF-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab), 33 were on ustekinumab, and 17 were treated with secukinumab. The rates of adverse events in these groups were recorded and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Infliximab-treated patients showed a high occurrence of asymptomatic, but increased liver enzymes, fatigue, and respiratory as well as dermatologic infections. Adalimumab-treated patients were more often affected by musculoskeletal disorders and infections of all types. Patients treated with secukinumab presented with higher rates of cardiovascular disorders as well as respiratory and dermatologic infections. The group receiving etanercept was more often diagnosed with musculoskeletal and reproductive disorders, specifically menstrual disorders. The rates of therapy discontinuation and serious adverse events did not reach statistically significant values. CONCLUSION: A higher incidence of adverse events was observed among adalimumab-, and infliximab-treated patients, with ustekinumab found to have the safest profile. Our results demonstrate that a personalized approach, including evaluation of a patient's risk profile, is necessary before commencing a biologic. Further research is warranted to confirm the findings of our study.
Subject(s)
Adalimumab , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Etanercept , Infliximab , Psoriasis , Ustekinumab , Humans , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Female , Male , Ustekinumab/therapeutic use , Ustekinumab/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Adalimumab/adverse effects , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Infliximab/adverse effects , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Adult , Etanercept/adverse effects , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic useSubject(s)
Psoriasis , Humans , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Male , Female , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Aged , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Adalimumab/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Age Factors , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Etanercept/adverse effects , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Infliximab/adverse effects , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Etanercept has been studied in doses up to 0.8 mg/kg/week (max 50 mg/week) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients. In clinical practice higher doses are used off-label, but evidence regarding the relation with outcomes is lacking. We describe the clinical course of JIA-patients receiving high-dose etanercept (1.6 mg/kg/week; max 50 mg/week) in the BeSt for Kids trial. METHODS: 92 patients with oligoarticular JIA, RF-negative polyarticular JIA or juvenile psoriatic arthritis were randomised across three treat-to-target arms: (1) sequential DMARD-monotherapy (sulfasalazine or methotrexate (MTX)), (2) combination-therapy MTX + 6 weeks prednisolone and (3) combination therapy MTX + etanercept. In any treatment-arm, patients could eventually escalate to high-dose etanercept alongside MTX 10mg/m2/week. RESULTS: 32 patients received high-dose etanercept (69% female, median age 6 years (IQR 4-10), median 10 months (7-16) from baseline). Median follow-up was 24.6 months. Most clinical parameters improved within 3 months after dose-increase: median JADAS10 from 7.2 to 2.8 (p = 0.008), VAS-physician from 12 to 4 (p = 0.022), VAS-patient/parent from 38.5 to 13 (p = 0.003), number of active joints from 2 to 0.5 (p = 0.12) and VAS-pain from 35.5 to 15 (p = 0.030). Functional impairments (CHAQ-score) improved more gradually and ESR remained stable. A comparable pattern was observed in 11 patients (73% girls, median age 8 (IQR 6-9)) who did not receive high-dose etanercept despite eligibility (comparison group). In both groups, 56% reached inactive disease at 6 months. No severe adverse events (SAEs) occurred after etanercept dose-increase. In the comparison group, 2 SAEs consisting of hospital admission occurred. Rates of non-severe AEs per subsequent patient year follow-up were 2.27 in the high-dose and 1.43 in the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: Escalation to high-dose etanercept in JIA-patients who were treated to target was generally followed by meaningful clinical improvement. However, similar improvements were observed in a smaller comparison group who did not escalate to high-dose etanercept. No SAEs were seen after escalation to high-dose etanercept. The division into the high-dose and comparison groups was not randomised, which is a potential source of bias. We advocate larger, randomised studies of high versus regular dose etanercept to provide high level evidence on efficacy and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register; NTR1574; 3 December 2008; https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/26585 .
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Juvenile , Drug Therapy, Combination , Etanercept , Methotrexate , Humans , Arthritis, Juvenile/drug therapy , Etanercept/administration & dosage , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Etanercept/adverse effects , Female , Male , Child , Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Child, Preschool , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Treatment Outcome , Prednisolone/administration & dosage , Sulfasalazine/administration & dosage , Sulfasalazine/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Endomyocardial fibrosis secondary to hyper-eosinophilic syndrome also known as Loeffler's Endocarditis is a rare cause of restrictive cardiomyopathy. If left untreated, it carries a very high morbidity and mortality rate. The case of a 20 years old girl, a known case of polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis since the age of 13 years was reported at Federal Government Polyclinic Hospital, Islamabad on 14th May 2022. She presented with an acute history of shortness of breath and cough for two weeks. Her initial echocardiogram showed suspicion of Loeffler's Endocarditis, which is attributed to be an adverse effect of etanercept- a tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor, which she had been prescribed for her arthritis. The patient is currently being managed with high doses of steroids, therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban, carvedilol for tachycardia and mycophenolate mofetil as an immunosuppressant.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Juvenile , Endomyocardial Fibrosis , Etanercept , Humans , Female , Arthritis, Juvenile/drug therapy , Arthritis, Juvenile/complications , Endomyocardial Fibrosis/drug therapy , Endomyocardial Fibrosis/etiology , Young Adult , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Etanercept/adverse effects , Hypereosinophilic Syndrome/drug therapy , Hypereosinophilic Syndrome/complications , Hypereosinophilic Syndrome/diagnosis , EchocardiographyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the clinical features, disease course, and associated factors for outcome in severe/refractory BD patients receiving TNF-i treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted by reviewing medical records from a tertiary referral center in Van province in Eastern Turkey. Data were obtained from patients' charts followed up between June 2019 and June 2022. RESULTS: We included 469 BD patients (59.3% male) whose 80 patients (17%) received TNF-i treatment in the study. The mean ± standard deviation of the patient age was 36.7 ± 10.1 years and the median (IQR) disease duration was 12 (12) years. IFX and ADAwere initiated in 67.5% (n = 54) and 32.5% (n = 26) patients, respectively. Overall and first-line retention rates of TNF-i were 84.7% and 92.6% for IFX and 83.3% and 80.8% for ADA, respectively. IFX was discontinued in 9 patients which were in 2 patients due to allergic reaction and tuberculosis, 3 patients for inefficacy, one patient for heart failure, and one patient for orbital zona. Although no serious adverse event was observed with ADA, 5 patients switched to IFX due to inefficacy. Overall, 72 patients (90%) resumed TNF-i at the end of the study; TNF-i was discontinued in 3 patients (3.8%) due to severe adverse events and in 5 patients (6.2%) with prolonged remission. CONCLUSION: In our study, no case of death was observed in TNF-i receiving patients. Most patients achieved attack-free and CS-free disease and retained TNF-i treatment. TNF inhibitors appear to be safe and effective in patients with severe/refractory Behçet's disease.
Subject(s)
Adalimumab , Behcet Syndrome , Humans , Behcet Syndrome/drug therapy , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Turkey , Middle Aged , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Adalimumab/adverse effects , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Infliximab/adverse effects , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/adverse effects , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Etanercept/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The risk of infection including tuberculosis (TB) infection or reactivation during biological therapy with the current various clinical application is a major concern. This risk may be higher in countries endemic to TB. Our aim of this study is to determine the risk of TB infection in patients receiving 3 biological treatments, Adalimumab, Etanercept and Tocilizumab. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study extending over 2 years follow-up for all patients receiving Adalimumab, Etanercept and Tocilizumab for various clinical indications in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia. RESULT: Over the period of 2015-2019, A total of 410 patients received Adalimumab, 271 received Etanercept and 58 patients received Tocilizumab. Rheumatoid arthritis was the most common indication for therapy in all groups and for Adalimumab the most common indication was inflammatory bowel disease, for Etanercept was psoriatic arthritis and for Tocilizumab was juvenile idiopathic arthritis. After a mean follow up period of 36 ± 8.9 months for patients receiving Adalimumab, 21.5 ± 8.4 months for patients receiving Etanercept and 21 ± 2.5 months for patients receiving Tocilizumab there were no reported cases of TB infection in all groups. Only one patient was diagnosed with latent TB 7 months later after starting Adalimumab and tow patients after starting Etanercept. The overall Interferon Gamma Release Assays (IGRA) positivity rate was 9.7%. There was significant association between IGRA positivity rate and patient age. The cutoff age in which IGRA positivity has significantly increased was 53.20 years. CONCLUSION: In our study, patients receiving Etanercept, Adalimumab and Tocilizumab had no increased risk of TB infection. Only 0.3% of patients treated with Adalimumab and 0.9% of patients treated with Etanercept converted to a positive IGRA during therapy.
Subject(s)
Adalimumab , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Etanercept , Tuberculosis , Humans , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Male , Female , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Adalimumab/adverse effects , Etanercept/adverse effects , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Middle Aged , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Arthritis, Juvenile/drug therapy , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Young Adult , AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DILE) is the development of lupus-like syndrome following a drug exposure. DILE has been reported less frequently among children than adults. METHODS: In this study, we present four children with DILE and similar published cases through a systematic literature review. RESULTS: We report four children (three girls and one boy) who developed DILE associated with the use of topiramate, doxycycline, etanercept, and ethosuximide. Three of them were positive for anti-histone antibodies. In all patients, the drug was discontinued and symptoms resolved completely. The literature review revealed 48 articles describing 61 children with DILE. In the evaluation of 65 patients (our 4 patients and 61 patients from the literature), the most frequently reported drugs associated with DILE were ethosuximide (n = 13) and minocycline (n = 12). Fever (n = 33), arthralgia (n = 31), rash (n = 30), and arthritis (n = 29) were the most common clinical manifestations. Antinuclear antibody (ANA) was positive in 93.5% of patients and anti-histone antibodies were detected in 72.2% of the patients. As for treatment, the responsible drug was discontinued in all patients, and corticosteroids were initiated in 53.3%. Improvement was achieved in 92.0% of patients. CONCLUSION: For children presenting with SLE features, proper drug history is crucial since DILE may be more frequent than anticipated. An association of the relevant drug with the symptoms, and resolution of symptoms on drug withdrawal provides evidence for the diagnosis of DILE.
Subject(s)
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Humans , Female , Male , Child , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/chemically induced , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Topiramate/adverse effects , Doxycycline/adverse effects , Ethosuximide/adverse effects , Adolescent , Etanercept/adverse effects , Minocycline/adverse effects , Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , Antibodies, Antinuclear/immunology , Child, PreschoolABSTRACT
The induction of autoimmune diseases during tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor (TNFi) usage has been described. Herein, we report a rare case of a 49-year-old woman with antimelanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) antibody (Ab)-positive dermatomyositis (DM), which developed 5 weeks after the introduction of an etanercept biosimilar to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Four of the five known cases, including ours, of anti-MDA5Ab-positive DM complicated with RA revealed anti-MDA5Ab-positive DM following TNFi usage. When patients with RA are diagnosed with interstitial lung disease during TNFi usage, anti-MDA5 Ab-positive DM could be a differential diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Autoantibodies , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals , Dermatomyositis , Etanercept , Interferon-Induced Helicase, IFIH1 , Humans , Dermatomyositis/immunology , Dermatomyositis/diagnosis , Female , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Etanercept/adverse effects , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Interferon-Induced Helicase, IFIH1/immunology , Autoantibodies/blood , Autoantibodies/immunology , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitors are among the most potent treatments for inflammatory arthropathies including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and spondyloarthropathies. The availability of these biologic agents have revolutionized the management of these conditions and improved patient outcomes. Though generally safe, these biologics may contribute to the induction or exacerbation of colitis. This paradoxical colitis has been observed in patients on TNF-α inhibitor etanercept and IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab and ixekizumab). We report a case of a 46-year-old female with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis who presented with gastrointestinal symptoms after treatment with etanercept and IL-17 inhibitors. She was later diagnosed with paradoxical indeterminate colitis that was masked and treated by subsequent biologics given for her RA and psoriatic arthritis. In this report, we will discuss the importance of considering paradoxical colitis in the differential diagnosis for patients even several years after TNF-α/IL-17 inhibitor initiation and explain why careful consideration must be made when initiating these colitis-inducing agents to treat patients with inflammatory disorders.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Arthritis, Psoriatic , Colitis , Etanercept , Interleukin-17 , Humans , Female , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Etanercept/adverse effects , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Interleukin-17/antagonists & inhibitors , Colitis/chemically induced , Colitis/drug therapy , Colitis/diagnosis , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Biosimilar-originator equivalence has been demonstrated in phase 3 trials in a few indications of infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab. The objective of our study was to compare the persistence and safety of biosimilars versus originators in all the licensed indications of these molecules. METHODS: We used data from the French National Health Data System (SNDS), covering 99% of the French population, to identify infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab initiators from biosimilar launch (January 2015, May 2016 and October 2018, respectively) to 30 June 2021. Patients were then followed for 1 year. Treatment persistence (duration without treatment discontinuation or modification) and safety (including severe infections, all-cause hospitalisation and death) were compared between originator and biosimilar users by Cox regressions weighting the populations on the inverse probability of treatment. Analyses were performed by molecule, by disease and by biosimilar product. RESULTS: From January 2015 to June 2021, 86 776 patients were included in the study: 22 670, 24 442 and 39 664 patients had initiated infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab, respectively; 49 752 (53%) were biosimilar initiators. We did not find any risk of discontinuation (HRs were below or around 1, here all pathologies and products together: infliximab 0.88 (0.80-0.97), etanercept 0.85 (0.81-0.90) and adalimumab 0.96 (0.91-1.00)) or safety event (infection: infliximab 0.97 (0.78-1.21), etanercept 1.04 (0.81-1.33) and adalimumab 0.98 (0.83-1.16); hospitalisation: infliximab 1.08 (0.96-1.23), etanercept 0.99 (0.87-1.11) and adalimumab 0.91 (0.83-0.99)) associated with biosimilar versus originator use. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows reassuring results regarding the persistence and safety of biosimilar tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors compared with originators in all licensed indications.
Subject(s)
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors , Humans , Adalimumab/adverse effects , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Etanercept/adverse effects , Infliximab/adverse effects , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/adverse effectsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Adalimumab (ADA) and etanercept (ETN) are the most commonly applied biologics for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management in China; however, the evidence regarding their superiority is controversial. In addition, in real-world clinical settings, many factors may affect the application of these agents, such as dosage and administration period. Therefore, the present real-world study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ADA and ETN treatment in RA patients via the propensity score matching method. METHODS: In total, 105 RA patients receiving ADA (n = 66) or ETN (n = 39) were reviewed in this retrospective study. The propensity score matching method was used to eliminate discrepancies in baseline features. Clinical response, low disease activity (LDA), and remission were evaluated based on the DAS28. RESULTS: Before propensity score matching, compared with ETN, ADA yielded higher rates of clinical response at W24 (97.0% vs. 84.6%, p = .021), LDA at W12 (78.8% vs. 51.3%, p = .003), and remission at W24 (75.8% vs. 46.2%, p = .002). After propensity score matching, compared with ETN, ADA only achieved a higher rate of clinical response at W24 (96.3% vs. 77.8%, p = .043), whereas the rates of LDA and remission were not different between ADA and ETN treatments at any time point (all p > .05). In addition, the incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between the ADA and ETN treatments (all p > .05). CONCLUSION: ADA shows superiority over ETN in terms of a numerically greater response rate and equivalent adverse events.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Humans , Adalimumab/adverse effects , Etanercept/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , ChinaABSTRACT
Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a rare severe cutaneous adverse reaction that involves more than 30% of the body surface area. TEN can be accompanied by a series of systemic symptoms and has a high risk of death. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors such as adalimumab and etanercept have been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of TEN in some cases. However, clinical data on the use of TNF-α inhibitors to treat TEN with severe systemic infection are scarce. In the present study, three adult patients who developed TEN with serious active infection were successfully treated with etanercept. One of the three patients had active open pulmonary tuberculosis, and the other two had septicemia and/or fungal sepsis. All patients' skin lesions significantly improved after several days, and none of the patients developed emerging or re-emerging infectious diseases, adverse reactions, or a similar rash during follow-up. TNF-α inhibitors may be an effective treatment choice for TEN with severe systemic infection. However, further studies with large samples are still required for validation because clinical experience is limited.
Subject(s)
Sepsis , Stevens-Johnson Syndrome , Adult , Humans , Etanercept/adverse effects , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/drug therapy , Adalimumab/adverse effects , Skin , Immunologic Factors , Sepsis/drug therapyABSTRACT
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a metabolic and endocrine disorder affecting women of reproductive age. This study examined the efficacy of etanercept (ETA), an anti-TNF-α drug, in alleviating endocrine, metabolic, and vascular dysfunction in a rat model of PCOS. Prepubertal female Wistar rats were divided into three groups: control, PCOS, and PCOS+ETA. The PCOS groups received dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) treatment, whereas the PCOS+ETA group received both DHEA and ETA. After 35 days, various biomarkers were evaluated, including systemic blood pressure, endothelial function, and eNOS and TNF-α expression levels in the thoracic aorta and ovaries. The PCOS group exhibited ovarian morphological changes, increased body weight, and hormonal imbalances, whereas the PCOS+ETA group showed restored levels of these parameters. Systemic blood pressure, urinary albumin levels, and protein excretion did not differ significantly differ among the groups. Endothelium-dependent relaxation, eNOS expression, TNF-α expression in the thoracic aorta, and TNF-α expression in the ovaries were restored to normal levels in the PCOS+ETA group. Furthermore, ovarian morphology was improved in the PCOS+ETA group. In conclusion, etanercept treatment shows promise in mitigating hormonal disturbances and vascular dysfunction in patients with PCOS, suggesting potential therapeutic advantages.
Subject(s)
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome , Humans , Rats , Female , Animals , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/chemically induced , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/drug therapy , Etanercept/adverse effects , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/adverse effects , Rats, Wistar , Dehydroepiandrosterone , Disease Models, AnimalABSTRACT
Scleritis is an inflammation of the episcleral and scleral tissues, characterized by injection in both superficial and deep episcleral vessels. When only episcleral tissue is involved, it is referred to as episcleritis. Episcleritis is mainly idiopathic but may be secondary to an underlying rheumatologic disease. Despite being rare, drug-associated episcleritis and scleritis should also be included in the differential diagnosis. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors are generally well-tolerated, but etanercept, in particular, has the potential to cause paradoxical adverse reactions including ocular inflammations, such as uveitis, scleritis, and ocular myositis. Etanercept differs in its mechanism of action from other TNF-α inhibitors as it acts as a decoy receptor, and this may partly explain the more frequently reported etanercept-associated ocular inflammation. Etanercept may also be ineffective in preventing ocular inflammation. However, the dechallenge and rechallenge phenomena have proven there is a causative link between etanercept and new-onset ocular inflammation. We report a case of a 15-year-old boy with enthesitis-related arthritis and familial Mediterranean fever who presented with episcleritis and blepharitis while receiving etanercept treatment and subsequently showed dechallenge and rechallenge reactions. Therefore, physicians should also be aware that episcleritis should be considered a paradoxical adverse reaction to etanercept and can occur in pediatric patients. We also reviewed the English literature to provide an overview and evaluate intervention options.
Subject(s)
Scleritis , Uveitis , Male , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Etanercept/adverse effects , Scleritis/chemically induced , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Uveitis/complications , Inflammation/complicationsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: COMPACT, a non-interventional study, evaluated the persistence, effectiveness, safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial-spondyloarthritis (axSpA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treated with SDZ ETN (etanercept [ETN] biosimilar) in Europe and Canada. METHODS: Patients (aged ≥ 18 years) who have been treated with SDZ ETN were categorised on the basis of prior treatment status (groups A-D): patients in clinical remission or with low disease activity under treatment with reference ETN or biosimilar ETN and switched to SDZ ETN; patients who received non-ETN targeted therapies and switched to SDZ ETN; biologic-naïve patients who started SDZ ETN after conventional therapy failure; or disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD)-naïve patients with RA considered suitable for treatment initiation with a biologic and started on treatment with SDZ ETN. The primary endpoint was drug persistence, defined as time from study enrolment until discontinuation of SDZ ETN treatment. RESULTS: Of the 1466 patients recruited, 844 (57.6%) had RA, 334 (22.8%) had axSpA and 288 (19.6%) had PsA. Patients had an ongoing SDZ ETN treatment at the time of enrolment for an observed average of 138 days (range 1-841); 22.7% of patients discontinued SDZ ETN through 12 months of study observation. Overall, all the patients receiving SDZ ETN showed good treatment persistence at 12 months with discontinuation rates of 15.2%, 25.7% and 27.8% in groups A, B and C, respectively. Across all patient groups, no major differences were observed in the disease activity and PRO scores between baseline and month 12. Injection-site reactions were low across the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: These results support the effectiveness and safety of SDZ ETN treatment in patients with RA, axSpA or PsA in real-life conditions. The treatment persistence rates observed were consistent with previously published reports of patients treated with reference or other biosimilar ETN. No new safety signals were identified.