Determination of five mTOR inhibitors in human plasma for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment using QuEChERS-UHPLC-MS/MS.

A fast and reliable QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe) method for pre-processing combined with Ultra - high performance liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) was established for the analysis of five mammalian rapamycin target protein (mTOR) inhibitors (vistusertib, AZD8055, pictilisib, everolimus, temsirolimus)in human plasma. Extraction was achieved by addition of acetonitrile to the sample followed by anhydrous magnesium sulfate and 30 mg C18 for salting out and purification, respectively. MTOR inhibitors were detected using selective response monitoring (SRM) under positive ion electrospray mode. Vistusertib, AZD8055 and pictilisib showed good linearity with a range of 1-80 ng/ml, Additionally, the concentration of everolimus and temsirolimus was 2.5-200 ng/ml and10-800 ng/ml, respectively. The linear correlation coefficient (R2) of each analysis was ≥ 0.9950. The limit of detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) were 0.015-0.75 ng/ml and 1-10 ng/ml, respectively. This method showed a high accuracy with high recovery rate and excellent stability. This method is fast, accurate and reliable, suitable for quantitative detection of mTOR inhibitors in human plasma.

Clinical Importance of Plasma Drug Concentration of Oral Molecular Targeted Drugs for Renal Cell Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is widely used in clinical practice to maximize drug efficacy and minimize toxicities. Currently, it is also practiced in the use of oral molecular targeted drugs. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical importance of measuring the systemic concentration of oral molecular targeted drugs used to treat renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: The systemic concentrations of the oral molecular targeted drugs sorafenib, sunitinib, axitinib, pazopanib, and everolimus used for RCC were useful for therapeutic interventions, and clinical outcomes were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: The interventional use of systemic drug concentration was confirmed in 26 of 87, and their categories are presented. The systemic concentration of sunitinib was useful in dose reduction and/or discontinuation (n = 10), dose escalation (n = 3), and adherence monitoring (n = 2). Nine of the 10 patients whose dose was reduced showed reduced adverse event. Two patients who were intervened in adherence monitor showed improved adherence. For axitinib, dose reduction and/or discontinuation (n = 1) and dose escalation (n = 6) were confirmed. For pazopanib, dose reduction and/or discontinuation (n = 1) and drug interaction detection (n = 1) were confirmed, both of them were confirmed to have reduced adverse events. For everolimus, dose reduction and/or discontinuation (n = 1) and drug interaction detection (n = 1) were confirmed, a patient with reduced dose recovered from adverse events. Interventions for sorafenib were not identified. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that systemic concentrations of oral molecular targeted drugs for RCC were considered to be clinically useful for dose adjustment, monitoring of treatment adherence, and the detection of drug interactions. Moreover, this information could be successfully used to guide individualized therapy to maximize the antitumor effects of these drugs.

Simultaneous quantification of cyclosporin, tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus in whole blood by UHPLC-MS/MS for therapeutic drug monitoring.

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a UHPLC-MS/MS assay to quantify cyclosporin (CYC), tacrolimus (TAC), sirolimus (SIR) and everolimus (EVE) in human whole blood for therapeutic drug monitoring. Analytes were extracted from 50 µL human whole blood by protein precipitation. The separation of the drugs was performed on an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column. Analytes were eluted with a mobile phase consisting of 2 mM ammonium acetate with 0.1% formic acid (v/v) in deionised water and 2 mM ammonium acetate with 0.1% formic acid (v/v) in methanol at a flow rate of 300 µL/min in gradient elution. The method performance was evaluated by analysing patient blood samples and/or external quality control samples [proficiency testing (PT) scheme]. The method was linear from 23.75 to 1094.0, 1.3 to 42.4, 1.3 to 47.0 and 1.2-41.6 µg/mL for CYC, TAC, SIR and EVE, respectively. The within- and between-assay reproducibility results were ˂ 11%. Results from PT and patient sample quantification were comparable to those obtained previously by an in-house validated method using protein precipitation and liquid-liquid extraction. This method showed good analytical performance for quantifying CYC, TAC, SIR and EVE in whole blood over their respective calibration ranges.

Salting Out-Assisted Liquid-Liquid Extraction for Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Measurement of Tacrolimus, Sirolimus, Everolimus, and Cyclosporine a in Whole Blood.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring of the immunosuppressants tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, and cyclosporine A is effectively performed by analyzing whole-blood samples using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Samples are usually prepared using simple protein precipitation (PPT) with methanol and zinc sulfate (ZnSO4). Significant sample dilution is necessary to obtain clean extracts but may increase the limit of quantification of the method. Salting out-assisted liquid-liquid extraction (SALLE) was explored as a novel sample preparation method for measuring these drugs in blood. METHOD: SALLE, which simply consists of LLE with a water-miscible solvent where phase separation is achieved by adding salt, was used to analyze treated blood samples. RESULTS: SALLE allowed direct injection of a 5-µL extract from the upper solvent phase into a reversed phase LC column, which would not be feasible using standard LLE. Compared with PPT, SALLE provided better extraction efficiencies and more ion enhancement, resulting in limit of quantification of 0.4, 1.4, 0.06, and 0.4 ng/mL for tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, and cyclosporine A, respectively. Full-method validation was performed, including a comparison of results with those of another laboratory. A ≤10% bias was observed for tacrolimus and cyclosporine A, whereas further investigation of that for sirolimus (-12%) and everolimus (-18%) revealed that it was caused by the different calibrators used. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of the use of SALLE for the measurement of tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, and cyclosporine A in whole blood. The advantages of SALLE over PPT and conventional LLE would make it an attractive sample preparation method for clinical laboratories.

Long-Term Performance of Laboratory-Developed Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Tests and a Food and Drug Administration-Approved Immunoassay for the Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Everolimus.

BACKGROUND: Laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) are analytical tests developed and validated "in-house" for clinical diagnosis. Regulatory agencies, such as the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), encourage using regulatory-approved assays rather than LDTs. In the ongoing Zortracker everolimus study, samples were provided monthly to participating clinical laboratories that conduct therapeutic drug monitoring of everolimus. This allowed for the long-term (6-year) comparison of the performance of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assays, which are LDTs, to the FDA-approved everolimus Quantitative Microsphere System (QMS). METHODS: Each laboratory received the same 3 blinded samples. LC-MS/MS and QMS assays were compared using Passing Bablok regression analysis. Data were analyzed in 12-month periods to detect trends over time. RESULTS: The slopes of the Passing Bablok regression curves remained unchanged in 2013 and 2014 (reference LC-MS/MS; test QMS: slope = 0.934 and 1.008). However, by 2016, the slope increased significantly to between 1.111 and 1.320, then dropped to 0.980 in 2017 and 0.912 in 2018, suggestive of changes in QMS bias compared with LC-MS/MS over longer periods. Outliers did not affect these results. The interlaboratory variability of LC-MS/MS and QMS remained unchanged from 2013 to 2015, with coefficients of variation of 15.3%, 18.4%, and 17.2% for LC-MS/MS, and 13.0%, 13.1%, and 15.3% for QMS, respectively, per year. At the end of the observation period, the average coefficients of variation in LC-MS/MS laboratories dropped to 14.3%, 12.6%, and 14.2%, whereas the variability in QMS laboratories was 19.5%, 13.3%, and 19.6% in 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Initially, QMS everolimus concentrations in patient samples were comparable with those detected in LC-MS/MS laboratories. However, concentration bias of the QMS assay significantly changed within 6 years, emphasizing the need for long-term, independent performance tracking of therapeutic drug monitoring assays, including FDA-approved assays.

Analysis of Immunosuppressant Drugs in Whole Blood by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

Immunosuppressant medications help suppress the immune system response through inhibition of various checkpoints in the regulatory biochemical pathway. This is useful in prevention of organ rejection in transplantation or in the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as lupus or rheumatoid arthritis. Quantification of immunosuppressive drugs in blood is needed clinically for optimization of treatment and to avoid toxicity or unwanted side effects. Here, we describe a quantitative method to determine the concentration of cyclosprine A, tacrolimus, sirolimus, and everolimus in whole blood. This method has been used for many years clinically to support patient care. © 2020 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Absence of interaction between rivaroxaban, tacrolimus and everolimus in renal transplant recipients with deep vein thrombosis or atrial fibrillation.

No data are available on rivaroxaban use in renal transplant recipients and on its surmised interaction with immunosuppressants. The aim was to investigate potential interactions between rivaroxaban and immunosuppressants in this setting. Renal transplant recipients with a stable renal function treated with rivaroxaban and tacrolimus with or without everolimus were investigated. All drugs and creatinine concentrations were determined daily for 2 weeks after the start of anticoagulation. Blood samples were drawn at 8.00 am and 3-4 h later for trough and peak concentrations, respectively. Bleeding and thrombotic events were recorded during a minimum follow-up of 6 months. In 8 renal transplant patients, rivaroxaban levels showed a predictable pharmacokinetic trend, both at Ctrough (30-61 µg/L) and at Cpeak (143-449 µg/L), with limited variability in the 25th-75th percentile range. Tacrolimus (Ctrough 3-13 µg/L; Cpeak 3-16 µg/L), everolimus (Ctrough 3-11 µg/L; Cpeak 5-17 µg/L) and creatinine concentrations were stable as well. Immunosuppressors variability before and after rivaroxaban were 30% and 30% for tacrolimus, 27% and 29% for everolimus, respectively, as well as 14% and 3% for creatinine. For rivaroxaban monitoring, the reference change value better performed in identifying significant variations of its concentration. No patient had bleeding or thrombotic events, worsening of renal graft function, and signs of immunosuppressants toxicity during a mean follow-up of 23 (9-28) months. In conclusion, rivaroxaban does not seem to interact with tacrolimus and everolimus in renal transplant recipients. Both anticoagulant and immunosuppressive effects seem warranted, without major bleeding complications and effect on the graft function.

Using ISO/TS 20914:2019 to calculate the measurement uncertainty of immunosuppressive drugs in a clinical laboratory.

According to the standard ISO 15189 clinical routine laboratories shall estimate measurement uncertainty (MU) of patient results of their provided measurands. Up to now there was no accepted description on how to perform. Recently, the ISO technical standard ISO/TS 20914 was published giving a practical guide for uncertainty estimation. The immunosuppressive drugs Everolimus, Ciclosporin, Sirolimus and Tacrolimus have narrow therapeutic windows. Hence, their MU should be considered for deducing clinical decisions. Here, a pathway is presented in detail on how to estimate MU measuring immunosuppressants using a widespread CE certified assay via LC-MS/MS technology. Namely, the expanded measurement uncertainties are from 13% to 27% depending on analyte and concentration. The calculation based on n > 2000 measurements each of four control levels within one year. Lower uncertainties were observed if the material was native pooled blood (13% to 17%, n > 300 measurements, one year).

Simultaneous Determination of Everolimus, Sirolimus, Tacrolimus, and Cyclosporine-A by Mass Spectrometry.

Measurement of immunosuppressive drug concentrations cyclosporine A (CyA), tacrolimus (TAC), sirolimus (SIR), and everolimus (EVE) in blood is an important application of therapeutic drug monitoring. These immunosuppressive agents are used in combined regimens and nowadays the liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry is the best option for simultaneous analysis of these drugs in one short run. We developed an liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry methodology in-house to measure the combination of immunosuppressants in a single blood sample from transplant patients in Brazil. We analyzed 235 combinations of 4 immunosuppressive drugs in patient blood to validate this study. The measuring ranges were 9 to 1000 ng/mL for CyA and 2 to 50 ng/mL for TAC, SIR, and EVE. Accuracy of the method was between 83.87% and 126.6% (coefficient of determination [r2] > 0.995). Validation of variation was ≤15% for lower limit of quantification. In our analysis 20% of patients treated with EVE showed concentration range of 6 to 6.9 ng/mL, 28% of patients treated with SIR showed a concentration range of 4 to 4.9 ng/mL to TAC, 22% of patients showed concentration range of 5 to 5.9 ng/mL, and finally 50% of patients treated with CyA showed concentration range of 20 to 30 ng/mL. Our routine laboratory was able to implement this new methodology in-house to measure simultaneous CyA, TAC, SIR, and EVE in a single blood sample from transplant patients with a sensibility and rapid quantification analysis.

Fate of Pediatric Renal Angiomyolipoma During mTOR Inhibitor Treatment in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic follow-up of renal angiomyolipoma (AML) in pediatric patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) on mTOR inhibitors. METHODS: We performed retrospective chart review of children who were diagnosed with TSC between 2000 and 2019 and prescribed everolimus at age ≤18 years. Treatment assessment was performed in patients who were medically-compliant by serum drug trough levels and who had at least a baseline and one subsequent renal imaging study. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were analyzed. Average age of everolimus initiation was 9 years, and indication was neurologic in 17 (90%). Fourteen patients (73.6%) had AML with average size of 1.9 (0.4-5) cm. Medication was discontinued due to side effects in 3 (16%) patients. Treatment assessment was analyzed for 15 patients with median medication exposure 5.1 (0.8-8.5) years. Among 13 with AML, the dominant lesion decreased in size in 9 (69%) and stayed stable in 4 (31%). Greatest absolute size decrease was seen for lesions ≥2 cm. No new AML lesions formed during treatment. CONCLUSION: Although not currently approved for this indication, everolimus appears to be well-tolerated with similar efficacy for pediatric AML as in adult AML. Use may be most warranted in children with AML ≥2 cm.

Effect of genetic polymorphisms in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and m-TOR on everolimus blood exposure and clinical outcomes in cancer patients.

Genetic variations in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and m-TOR could contribute to interpatient variability regarding m-TOR inhibitors pharmacokinetics or cellular effects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of selected candidate variations in these genes on everolimus pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and toxicity in cancer patients. Thirty-four patients receiving everolimus for breast (n = 22) or renal (n = 10) cancers, or neuroendocrine tumors of pancreatic origin (n = 2) were included in the study. Six variants in genes related to everolimus pharmacokinetics (CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3) or pharmacodynamics (m-TOR rs2295079, rs2295080, rs2024627 and rs1057079) were genotyped. Associations with trough concentrations (C0), dose reductions, or treatment interruptions due to toxicity and progression-free survival were investigated using generalized estimating equations and Cox models. CYP3A5 nonexpressers had significantly higher C0 as compared with expressers (ßGG vs AG = + 6.32 ± 2.22 ng/mL, p = 0.004). m-TOR rs2024627 was significantly associated with an increased risk of cancer progression studied alone or as part of an haplotype (T vs C: HR = 2.60, 95% CI [1.16-5.80], p = 0.020; CTCG vs other haplotypes HR = 2.29, 95% CI [1.06-4.95], p = 0.035, respectively). This study showed that CYP3A5 expression impacts everolimus pharmacokinetics in cancer patients and identified a genetic variation in m-TOR associated with the risk of cancer progression.

Cannabidiol Elevates Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Inhibitor Levels in Patients With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex.

BACKGROUND: The mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors everolimus and sirolimus have activity against multiple manifestations of tuberous sclerosis complex and are approved to treat astrocytomas, angiomyolipomas, lymphangioleiomyomatosis, and epilepsy. Cannabidiol is a novel antiepileptic medication. There is lack of information regarding drug-drug interactions between mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors and cannabidiol in clinical practice. METHODS: We reviewed patients with tuberous sclerosis complex who were treated with a mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor (everolimus, sirolimus) and cannabidiol. Clinical information, mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor and cannabidiol dosing, concomitant antiepileptic drugs, as well as laboratory and adverse events were reviewed before and after initiation of cannabidiol. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were treated with cannabidiol and a mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor (18 everolimus, seven sirolimus). All mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor levels were drawn as troughs. Levels were significantly higher in 76% patients after cannabidiol treatment (P = 0.0003). Median change from baseline was +9.8 ng/mL for everolimus and +5.1 ng/mL for sirolimus. Adverse events occurred in 40%, with diarrhea being the most frequent adverse event occurring in three patients. No severe adverse events occurred during the treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: Cannabidiol resulted in increased serum levels of everolimus and/or sirolimus. Some patients experienced doubling or tripling of their mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor trough following the addition of cannabidiol. In some cases, this resulted in clinical toxicity, as well as laboratory abnormalities. Awareness of this interaction can lead clinicians to evaluate serum levels and other safety laboratory studies more closely, and thereby avoid potentially significant adverse effects. In patients known to be prone to mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor toxicity, preemptive reduction in dose may be warranted upon initiation of cannabidiol.

An isotope dilution LC-MS/MS based candidate reference method for the quantification of cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus in human whole blood.

An isotope dilution LC-MS/MS based candidate reference measurement procedure for the quantification of cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus in human whole blood is presented to be used for evaluation and standardization of routine assays applied for therapeutic drug monitoring. The assay allows baseline separation of the four immunosuppressive drugs within a total runtime of 9 minutes using a C4 reversed phase column. Sample preparation is based on protein precipitation with zinc sulphate followed by purification with solid phase extraction. Reference materials used in this reference measurement procedure were characterized by qNMR and an absolute content of analytes calculated to guarantee traceability to SI units. As internal standards the corresponding deuterated and 13C-labelled analytes were used. The method allows the measurement of cyclosporine A in the range of 5 ng/mL to 2100 ng/mL; tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus were analysed in the range of 0.25 ng/mL to 50 ng/mL. Imprecision for inter-day measurements were found to be ≤3.5% for cyclosporine A and ≤4.4% for tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus. Accuracy was found to be within 101% and 108% for cyclosporine A and between 95% and 104% for the macrolide compounds. The uncertainty was evaluated according to the GUM. Expanded measurement uncertainties were found to be ≤7.2% for cyclosporine A, ≤6.8% for tacrolimus, ≤9.0% for sirolimus and ≤8.9% for everolimus (k = 2).

Optimal dose of everolimus administered with tacrolimus in living donor kidney transplantation.

Everolimus (EVR) is often administered with cyclosporine A (CsA), according to an established protocol. Although the administration protocol of EVR with tacrolimus (TAC) has not been established, it has been clinically demonstrated that a higher dose of EVR is necessary when used in combination with TAC than with CsA. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimal dose of EVR administered with TAC to maintain a similar EVR level in the blood to that observed when EVR is administered with CsA. Between June 2009 and January 2016, 22 patients who underwent living donor kidney transplantation were enrolled in this study. Among them, 12 patients were administered steroids, basiliximab, CsA, and EVR (CsA + EVR group) and 10 were administered steroids, basiliximab, TAC, and EVR (TAC + EVR group). Blood samples were collected at different time points from patients in both CsA + EVR and TAC + EVR groups, after drug administration. The trough EVR level in both groups was maintained within 3-8 ng/mL during the perioperative period. The optimal EVR doses for both groups were estimated by using a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Overall, the optimal dose of EVR for the TAC + EVR group was 3.59-fold higher than that for the CsA + EVR group to maintain a similar trough level to that of the latter group. Thus, administration of a higher EVR dose is recommended when provided in combination with TAC than with CsA to prevent adverse events caused by under immunosuppression, that could lead to acute kidney rejection.

A high-throughput LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of four immunosu- ppressants drugs in whole blood.

BACKGROUND: Immunoassays and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) are two major methods for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of immunosuppressant drugs. Compared to the relatively limited analytical performance and cross reactivities of immunoassays, the LC-MS/MS method is considered as a gold standard; however, the lack of systematic evaluation and standardization needs to be addressed. METHODS: A LC-MS/MS method for the determination of cyclosporine A, sirolimus, tacrolimus, and everolimus was developed. One-step protein precipitation was used to prepare blood samples. The newly developed method was systematically evaluated and validated according to the standard guidelines. RESULTS: The quantitative method for four immunosuppressant drugs in human whole blood was validated according to the guidelines. The lower limits of the measuring interval (LLMI) for cyclosporine A, sirolimus, tacrolimus, and everolimus were 5, 0.5, 0.5, and 0.5 ng/mL, respectively. Linear correlation coefficients were all >0.999. Internal standard-normalized (IS-normalized) matrix correction factor was within the range 0.88-1.17. The average spiked recoveries of five replicates for the four immunosuppressant drugs were in the range 87.4-109.6%. CONCLUSION: An LC-MS/MS method combined with one-step protein precipitation was developed, providing short sample preparation and chromatographic run time, thus allowing easy clinical diagnosis.

Clinical application of a dried blood spot assay for sirolimus and everolimus in transplant patients.

Background Monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs such as everolimus and sirolimus is important in allograft rejection prevention in transplant patients. Dried blood spots (DBS) sampling gives patients the opportunity to sample a drop of blood from a fingerprick at home, which can be sent to the laboratory by mail. Methods A total of 39 sirolimus and 44 everolimus paired fingerprick DBS and whole blood (WB) samples were obtained from 60 adult transplant patients for method comparison using Passing-Bablok regression. Bias was assessed using Bland-Altman. Two validation limits were pre-defined: limits of analytical acceptance were set at >67% of all paired samples within 20% of the mean of both samples and limits of clinical relevance were set in a multidisciplinary team at >80% of all paired samples within 15% of the mean of both samples. Results For both sirolimus and everolimus, Passing-Bablok regression showed no differences between WB and DBS with slopes of 0.86 (95% CI slope, 0.72-1.02) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.84-1.06), respectively. Only everolimus showed a significant constant bias of 4%. For both sirolimus and everolimus, limits of analytical acceptance were met (76.9% and 81.8%, respectively), but limits or clinical relevance were not met (77.3% and 61.5%, respectively). Conclusions Because pre-defined limits of clinical relevance were not met, this DBS sampling method for sirolimus and everolimus cannot replace WB sampling in our center at this time. However, if the clinical setting is compatible with less strict limits for clinical relevance, this DBS method is suitable for clinical application.

Variability of the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors Is Correlated With Long-Term Renal Graft Survival.

BACKGROUND: Many studies demonstrate the relationship between the high intrapatient variability of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) levels and poor long-term renal graft outcome. Our objective is to analyze the intrapatient variability observed in the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTOR-i) blood levels, to compare the variability of sirolimus (SRL) with that of everolimus (EVL) in kidney transplant patients converted to an mTOR-i, and to analyze whether the coefficient of variation (CV) was correlated with long-term graft survival. METHODS: We analyzed 279 adult renal transplant patients converted to an mTOR-i. CV was calculated using at least 3 blood trough levels between 3 and 18 months postconversion. RESULTS: The mean and median CV of the entire group was 25.54% and 23.7%, respectively. SRL and EVL mean CV was 23.8% and 27.1% (P = .03), respectively. The group of patients into the last tertile with CV> 28.52% presented a lower death-censored graft survival (75.26% vs. 93.01%, P < .0001) with a mean follow-up of 66.5 months. CONCLUSION: The CV of mTOR-i is correlated with long-term renal graft survival, so it should be considered a prognostic factor. SRL has a lower CV than EVL in renal transplant patients converted to mTOR-i in the stable posttransplant phase.

Trough Levels of Everolimus Are Associated With Recurrence Rates of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation.

PURPOSE: Everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, may have a protective role on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT), but data regarding the impact of its trough serum levels on HCC recurrence are missing. METHODS: Fifty-five patients (43 men, age 55 ± 8 years) who underwent LT for HCC were evaluated. Several demographic and clinical variables were recorded, including radiological and histological characteristics of HCC as well as dosages and trough levels of immunosuppressive regimens. RESULTS: HCC recurrence occurred in 11 (20%) patients: 5 (25%) of 20 patients under calcineurin inhibitors and 6 (17%) of the 35 patients under everolimus (P = .48). The patients with HCC recurrence (n = 11, group 1), compared to those without recurrence (n = 44, group 2), had significantly more frequent HCC in the explant: outside Milan criteria (P = .001), microvascular invasion (P < .001), and higher number of nodules (P = .001). In multivariate analysis, microvascular invasion was the only independent factor significantly associated with HCC recurrence (OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.4-10.5, P = .03). Among the patients who received everolimus-based immunosuppression, the recipients with HCC recurrence, compared to those without HCC recurrence, had significantly lower mean trough levels of everolimus at 7-12 months post-LT (3.9 vs 5.9 ng/mL, P = .001), while the patients with mean trough levels of everolimus >6 ng/mL had decreased HCC recurrence rates (log rank: 2.3, P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: We found for the first time mean concentrations of everolimus between 7-12 months post-LT as the only modifiable variable related with HCC recurrence in LT recipients. However, larger studies are needed for final conclusions.

Preanalytical considerations in therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressants with dried blood spots.

Background Dried blood spots (DBSs) could allow patients to prepare their own samples at home and send them to the laboratory for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of immunosuppressants. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the current knowledge about the impact of DBS-related preanalytical factors on TDM of tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus. Content Blood spot volume, blood spot inhomogeneity, stability of analytes in DBS and hematocrit (Hct) effects are considered important DBS-related preanalytical factors. In addition, the influence of drying time has recently been identified as a noteworthy preanalytical factor. Tacrolimus is not significantly influenced by these factors. Sirolimus and everolimus are more prone to heat degradation and exhibited variations in recovery which were dependent on Hct and drying time. Summary and outlook DBS-related preanalytical factors can have a significant impact on TDM for immunosuppressants. Tacrolimus is not significantly influenced by the studied preanalytical factors and is a viable candidate for DBS sampling. For sirolimus and everolimus more validation of preanalytical factors is needed. In particular, drying conditions need to be examined further, as current protocols may mask Hct-dependent effects on recovery. Further validation is also necessary for home-based self-sampling of immunosuppressants as the sampling quality is variable.