Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 203(5): W506-15, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25341165

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: When crushed oral tablets are injected i.v., their filler material (excipient) can induce a potentially fatal foreign-body reaction in pulmonary arterioles, presenting as dyspnea and pulmonary hypertension with centrilobular nodules on CT. We will describe the imaging and pathologic features of "excipient lung disease." CONCLUSION: The radiologist has a critical role in recognizing and reporting excipient lung disease because the referring clinician may be unaware of the patient's i.v. drug abuse.


Subject(s)
Excipients/poisoning , Foreign-Body Migration/diagnostic imaging , Foreign-Body Migration/etiology , Injections, Intravenous , Lung Injury/diagnostic imaging , Lung Injury/etiology , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complications , Adult , Aged , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography
3.
J Toxicol Clin Toxicol ; 36(7): 733-6, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9865244

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe a case of fat embolus syndrome with lipoid pneumonia resulting from intravenous infusion of lipid and to illustrate the potential for accidental intravenous administration of vegetable oil-based progesterone preparations in the treatment of oncology patients. CASE REPORT: A patient with recurrent ovarian carcinoma accidentally received approximately 20 mL (0.29 mL/kg) of a peanut oil-based methylprogesterone product intravenously via infusion pump over 24 hours. The patient developed a lipoid pneumonia with dyspnea, cough, hypoxia, radiographic infiltrates, and a pleural effusion. She was hospitalized for 4 days, and signs and symptoms resolved over 2 weeks following steroids and supportive care. DISCUSSION: Experience with accidental or intentional intravenous lipid overdose in humans is limited. Typical findings of fat embolus syndrome are similar to lipid aspiration, with respiratory distress, hypoxia, and pulmonary infiltrates. In contrast to aspiration, however, fat embolus syndrome results in lipogranulomas surrounding blood vessels, rather than air passages, and potentially produces cerebrovascular, accident-like symptoms. Management of fat embolus syndrome is similar to that for lipid aspiration. However, as seen in this case, fat embolus syndrome typically resolves over several weeks as opposed to the 3-month to 1-year period seen with aspiration lipoid pneumonias. CONCLUSIONS: Accidental intravenous infusion of vegetable oil-based products is a potential complication of the increased use of intravenous progesterones.


Subject(s)
Embolism, Fat/chemically induced , Excipients/poisoning , Plant Oils/poisoning , Pneumonia, Lipid/chemically induced , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/therapeutic use , Equipment Failure , Excipients/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Medication Errors , Medroxyprogesterone/administration & dosage , Medroxyprogesterone/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use , Peanut Oil , Plant Oils/administration & dosage , Progesterone Congeners/administration & dosage , Progesterone Congeners/therapeutic use , Syndrome
5.
Ann Intern Med ; 122(6): 456-61, 1995 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7856995

ABSTRACT

The Elixir Sulfanilamide disaster of 1937 was one of the most consequential mass poisonings of the 20th century. This tragedy occurred shortly after the introduction of sulfanilamide, the first sulfa antimicrobial drug, when diethylene glycol was used as the diluent in the formulation of a liquid preparation of sulfanilamide known as Elixir Sulfanilamide. One hundred five patients died from its therapeutic use. Under the existing drug regulations, premarketing toxicity testing was not required. In reaction to this calamity, the U.S. Congress passed the 1938 Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, which required proof of safety before the release of a new drug. The 1938 law changed the drug focus of the Food and Drug Administration from that of a policing agency primarily concerned with the confiscation of adulterated drugs to a regulatory agency increasingly involved with overseeing the evaluation of new drugs. The Elixir Sulfanilamide tragedy, its effect on drug regulations, and the history of other diethylene glycol and diluent mass poisonings are discussed.


Subject(s)
Drug Approval/history , Ethylene Glycols/history , Excipients/history , Sulfanilamides/history , Drug Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Ethylene Glycols/poisoning , Excipients/poisoning , History, 20th Century , Humans , Poisoning/mortality , Sulfanilamide , Sulfanilamides/poisoning , Toxicity Tests/history , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration/history , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...