Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 10(1): 159, 2021 11 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34749807

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the COVID-19 pandemic context, a massive shortage of personal protective equipment occurred. To increase the available stocks, several countries appealed for donations from individuals or industries. While national and international standards to evaluate personal protective equipment exist, none of the previous research studied how to evaluate personal protective equipment coming from donations to healthcare establishments. Our aim was to evaluate the quality and possible use of the personal protective equipment donations delivered to our health care establishment in order to avoid a shortage and to protect health care workers throughout the COVID-19 crisis. METHODS: Our intervention focused on evaluation of the quality of donations for medical use through creation of a set of assessment criteria and analysis of the economic impact of these donations. RESULTS: Between 20th March 2020 and 11th May 2020, we received 239 donations including respirators, gloves, coveralls, face masks, gowns, hats, overshoes, alcohol-based hand rubs, face shields, goggles and aprons. A total of 448,666 (86.3%) products out of the 519,618 initially received were validated and distributed in health care units, equivalent to 126 (52.7%) donations out of the 239 received. The budgetary value of the validated donations was 32,872 euros according to the pre COVID-19 prices and 122,178 euros according to the current COVID-19 prices, representing an increase of 371.7%. CONCLUSIONS: By ensuring a constant influx of personal protective equipment and proper stock management, shortages were avoided. Procurement and distribution of controlled and validated personal protective equipment is the key to providing quality care while guaranteeing health care worker safety.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Eye Protective Devices/supply & distribution , Health Personnel/psychology , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Masks/supply & distribution , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , Protective Clothing/supply & distribution , Safety Management , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Infection Control , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment/statistics & numerical data , Protective Clothing/statistics & numerical data , Quality Improvement , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 49(3): 389-391, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32791260

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus pandemic resulted in a shortage of protective equipment. To meet the request of eye-protecting devices, an interdisciplinary consortium involving practitioners, researchers, engineers and technicians developed and manufactured thousands of inexpensive 3D-printed face shields, inside hospital setting. This action leads to the concept of "concurrent, agile, and rapid engineering".


Subject(s)
COVID-19/transmission , Eye Protective Devices/supply & distribution , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Printing, Three-Dimensional , COVID-19/prevention & control , Conjunctiva/virology , Eye Protective Devices/virology , Health Personnel , Humans , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , Personal Protective Equipment/virology , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Can J Psychiatry ; 66(1): 17-24, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32957803

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between perceived adequacy of personal protective equipment (PPE) and workplace-based infection control procedures (ICP) and mental health symptoms among a sample of health-care workers in Canada within the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A convenience-based internet survey of health-care workers in Canada was facilitated through various labor organizations between April 7 and May 13, 2020. A total of 7,298 respondents started the survey, of which 5,988 reported information on the main exposures and outcomes. Anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) screener, and depression symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) screener. We assessed the perceived need and adequacy of 8 types of PPE and 10 different ICP. Regression analyses examined the proportion of GAD-2 and PHQ-2 scores of 3 and higher across levels of PPE and ICP, adjusted for a range of demographic, occupation, workplace, and COVID-19-specific measures. RESULTS: A total of 54.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53.5% to 56.1%) of the sample had GAD-2 scores of 3 and higher, and 42.3% (95% CI, 41.0% to 43.6%) of the sample had PHQ-2 scores of 3 and higher. Absolute differences of 18% (95% CI, 12% to 23%) and 17% (95% CI, 12% to 22%) were observed in the prevalence of GAD-2 scores of 3 and higher between workers whose perceived PPE needs and ICP needs were met compared to those who needs were not met. Differences of between 11% (95% CI, 6% to 17%) and 19% (95% CI, 14% to 24%) were observed in PHQ-2 scores of 3 and higher across these same PPE and ICP categories. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest strengthening employer-based infection control strategies likely has important implications for the mental health symptoms among health-care workers in Canada.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/psychology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Depression/psychology , Health Personnel/psychology , Infection Control/standards , Occupational Health , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , Age Factors , Anxiety/epidemiology , Attitude of Health Personnel , Canada/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Eye Protective Devices/supply & distribution , Female , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Masks/supply & distribution , N95 Respirators/supply & distribution , Patient Health Questionnaire , Perception , Respiratory Protective Devices/supply & distribution , SARS-CoV-2 , Sex Factors , Surgical Attire/supply & distribution , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Semin Perinatol ; 44(6): 151293, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32829956

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 Pandemic is an ongoing crisis that has strained hospitals and health systems around the globe. The provision of personal protective equipment (PPE) for frontline healthcare workers is of utmost importance in sustaining an effective response to this crisis. New York City has experienced one of the most devastating outbreaks of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In this article we report the experience of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Columbia University in New York City in managing the supply of PPE for providers and staff during the height of the outbreak. We describe the types of equipment used and aspects of PPE regulation and certification. We also describe our practices in extended use and reuse of PPE in light of the current understanding of the virus characteristics and modes of transmission.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Gynecology , Obstetrics , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , Eye Protective Devices/supply & distribution , Female , Gloves, Protective/supply & distribution , Health Personnel , Humans , Masks/standards , Masks/supply & distribution , New York City/epidemiology , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Pregnancy , Surgical Attire/supply & distribution
5.
6.
Trop Med Int Health ; 17(3): 397-401, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22035344

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In view of the substantial incidence of bloodborne diseases and risk to surgical healthcare workers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), we evaluated the availability of eye protection, aprons, sterile gloves, sterilizers and suction pumps. METHODS: Review of studies using the WHO Tool for the Situational Analysis of Access to Emergency and Essential Surgical Care. RESULTS: Eight papers documented data from 164 hospitals: Afghanistan (17), Gambia (18), Ghana (17), Liberia (16), Mongolia (44), Sierra Leone (12), Solomon Islands (9) and Sri Lanka (31). No country had a 100% supply of any item. Eye protection was available in only one hospital in Sri Lanka (4%) and most abundant in Liberia (56%). The availability of sterile gloves ranged from 24% in Afghanistan to 94% in Ghana. CONCLUSION: Substantial deficiencies of basic protective supplies exist in low- and middle-income countries.


Subject(s)
General Surgery , HIV Infections/etiology , Infections/etiology , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Protective Devices/supply & distribution , Safety Management/standards , Africa , Asia , Blood-Borne Pathogens , Developing Countries , Eye Protective Devices/supply & distribution , Gloves, Surgical/supply & distribution , HIV , HIV Infections/blood , HIV Infections/transmission , Health Personnel , Humans , Income , Infections/blood , Infections/transmission , Melanesia , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Risk Factors
9.
Inj Control Saf Promot ; 11(1): 47-53, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14977505

ABSTRACT

Sports venues are in a position to potentially influence the safety practices of their patrons. This study examined the knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of venue operators that could influence the use of protective eyewear by squash players. A 50% random sample of all private and public squash venues affiliated with the Victorian Squash Federation in metropolitan Melbourne was selected. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 15 squash venue operators during August 2001. Interviews were transcribed and content and thematic analyses were performed. The content of the interviews covered five topics: (1) overall injury risk perception, (2) eye injury occurrence, (3) knowledge, behaviors, attitudes and beliefs associated with protective eyewear, (4) compulsory protective eyewear and (5) availability of protective eyewear at venues. Venue operators were mainly concerned with the severe nature of eye injuries, rather than the relatively low incidence of these injuries. Some venue operators believed that players should wear any eyewear, rather than none at all, and believed that more players should use protective eyewear. Generally, they did not believe that players with higher levels of experience and expertise needed to wear protective eyewear when playing. Only six venues had at least one type of eyewear available for players to hire or borrow or to purchase. Operators expressed a desire to be informed about correct protective eyewear. Appropriate protective eyewear is not readily available at squash venues. Better-informed venue operators may be more likely to provide suitable protective eyewear.


Subject(s)
Eye Injuries/prevention & control , Eye Protective Devices , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Public Facilities , Racquet Sports/injuries , Australia , Eye Protective Devices/supply & distribution , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Random Allocation
10.
Bull Acad Natl Med ; 184(5): 1049-58; discussion 1058-60, 2000.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11077724

ABSTRACT

Watching directly at the sun without appropriate protection, particularly during a solar eclipse, can cause severe retinal injuries. On 11 August 1999, a total solar eclipse crossed France. The Direction Générale de la Santé implemented a prevention strategy. A formal agreement was developed with manufacturers and importers of protective glasses and more than 30 million glasses, conformed with safety standards, were distributed in France. Information campaign reach the whole population in France. In order to evaluate the impact of this campaign, The National Institute of Public Health in France implemented a nation-wide surveillance of ocular complications related to the eclipse. Information on patients was collected using a standardised questionnaire. The questionnaire was sent to the 5,600 private and public sector ophthalmologists practising in France and to five hundred hospital emergency units. A total of 147 patients were reported to have had a retinal injury associated with viewing the eclipse. Seventeen cases were severe (visual acuity < 2/10th) of whom 7 had bilateral injury. Forty-four per cent of patients were aged 15 to 29 years and 46% viewed the eclipse in three regions in the south of France which were sunny on 11th August. One hundred and six patients (67% aged 30 years and more) presented with keratitis. Thirty-six per cent occurred in 2 northern regions of France, which were overcast on the day. A hundred patients watched the whole eclipse without any protection, 74 reported to have removed their EC glasses, and 32 used non-appropriate devices. Only 4 patients presenting with retinal injury reported having used the EC glasses the whole time whilst viewing the eclipse. France is the only country in Europe to have implemented an exhaustive prospective surveillance of ocular injuries related to the solar eclipse. According to current data, the quality and availability of EC glasses did not contribute significantly to ocular injuries. Clinical and epidemiological studies are being conducted in order to further document the evolution of patients presenting with retinal injuries, the circumstances of observation, and their comprehension of preventive messages.


Subject(s)
Eye Burns/prevention & control , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Retina/radiation effects , Solar Activity , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Eye Burns/epidemiology , Eye Protective Devices/supply & distribution , Female , France/epidemiology , Health Promotion , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiation Injuries/epidemiology , Sex Distribution
11.
Ann Occup Hyg ; 43(3): 193-9, 1999 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10366899

ABSTRACT

A study was conducted to determine the effects of strapped spectacles on the fit factors obtained during quantitative fit testing on three different brands of full facepiece negative pressure respirators. The three brands of respirators were evaluated with and without strapped spectacles worn by the test subjects. A total of 180 quantitative fit testing trials were conducted on ten male test subjects. For each test subject, three quantitative fit testing trials were performed with each brand of respirator with and without the spectacles. The average of the fit testing trials for each subject with each respirator was used for statistical analysis. The results demonstrated that the fit factor values were significantly lower during use of the spectacles (p < 0.05). The estimated percentage of test subjects who failed the American National Standards Institute pass/fail criteria for quantitative fit testing (1000) increased by 15-36% when spectacles were worn.


Subject(s)
Eye Protective Devices/standards , Respiratory Protective Devices/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Equipment Design , Ergonomics , Eye Protective Devices/supply & distribution , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Materials Testing , Respiratory Protective Devices/supply & distribution
13.
Bauru; s.n; 1993. 172 p.
Thesis in Portuguese | BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-862020

Subject(s)
Protective Devices/classification , Protective Devices/microbiology , Protective Devices/standards , Protective Devices , Accident Prevention , Practice Patterns, Dentists'/standards , Dental Offices/methods , Dental Offices/standards , Dental Offices/supply & distribution , Dental Offices , Communicable Disease Control/instrumentation , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Communicable Disease Control/trends , Dental Auxiliaries/supply & distribution , Disinfection/instrumentation , Disinfection/methods , Eye Protective Devices/classification , Eye Protective Devices/supply & distribution , Eye Protective Devices , Communicable Diseases/etiology , Communicable Diseases/transmission , Sterilization/instrumentation , Sterilization/methods , Gloves, Protective/classification , Gloves, Protective/supply & distribution , Gloves, Protective/statistics & numerical data , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Hepatitis D/prevention & control , Herpes Simplex/prevention & control , Masks/classification , Masks/supply & distribution , Masks , Dentists/supply & distribution , Pneumonia/prevention & control , Equipment Safety/instrumentation , Equipment Safety/methods , Syphilis/prevention & control , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/prevention & control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/methods , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/standards , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Tuberculosis/prevention & control
14.
Aust N Z J Ophthalmol ; 18(1): 95-8, 1990 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2357364

ABSTRACT

Concern over potential eye injury from sunlight prompted this study to see if the levels of sunlight in Christchurch posed a particular risk to our population's eyes, whether the populace was aware of any risk and whether effective sunglasses were freely available to the public. While there has been a 4% to 9% increase in UV radiation since 1969 due to global ozone depletion, no firm evidence was found that focal ozone depletion was a particular problem in New Zealand. Christchurch residents were poorly informed about the ocular hazards of sunlight. A questionnaire completed by 200 adults disclosed 32% were unaware of the particular danger of UV light and only 3% knew that snow blindness, eclipse burns and cataracts could all be caused by sunlight. Fifty-four sunglasses were analysed for labelling and for transmission characteristics of their lenses. The standard of labelling of the sunglasses was poor with only 53% making reference to UV transmission characteristics and only three pairs stating that they adhered to the New Zealand Sunglass Standard. Attention is drawn to the need to improve public awareness of the potential for eye injury from sunlight and to improve the standard of labelling of sunglasses.


Subject(s)
Eye Injuries/prevention & control , Eye Protective Devices , Protective Devices , Radiation Protection , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Eye/radiation effects , Eye Injuries/epidemiology , Eye Injuries/etiology , Eye Protective Devices/standards , Eye Protective Devices/supply & distribution , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New Zealand/epidemiology , Protective Devices/standards , Protective Devices/supply & distribution , Risk Factors , Sunlight/adverse effects , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 18(5 Pt 1): 1030-8, 1988 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3385022

ABSTRACT

Because so little data are available on practices and procedures used by tanning salons, we studied, as customers, salons in a major city in Arkansas, the state where the practice began. We measured both ultraviolet A (UVA) and ultraviolet B (UVB) output at multiple reference points and found UVB always to be present, but at lower-than-expected levels. The highest irradiance was always at the umbilicus and the lowest was on the face. We evaluated compliance with accepted safety principles and federal guidelines and regulations; too often we found no eye protection and sometimes we found inadequate limits of exposure time. Persons with skin types I and II were sometimes promised a safe, effective UVA tan that would protect against sunburn. From our experience we concluded that if the industry is to continue, there is need for closer supervision and regulation.


Subject(s)
Professional Competence/standards , Sunburn/prevention & control , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects , Equipment and Supplies/standards , Eye Protective Devices/supply & distribution , Humans , Radiation Dosage , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...