FXa-mediated PAR-2 promotes the efficacy of immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma through immune escape and anoikis resistance by inducing PD-L1 transcription.

BACKGROUND: The high metastasis rate is one of the main reasons for the poor prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Coagulation factor Xa (FXa) and its receptor proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) proven to promote tumor metastasis in other forms of cancer. Here, we explore the role and mechanism of FXa in the regulation of resistance of anoikis and immune escape of HCC. METHODS: In vitro and in vivo experiments were conducted to explore the role of FXa in HCC metastasis and its potential mechanism. The effects of FXa inhibitor rivaroxaban on HCC immunotherapy were evaluated using intrahepatic metastasis animal models and clinical trial (No. ChiCTR20000040540). We investigated the potential of FXa inhibition as a treatment for HCC. RESULTS: FXa was highly expressed in HCC and promoted metastasis by activating PAR-2. Mechanistically, FXa-activated PAR-2 endows HCC cells with the ability of anoikis resistance to survive in the circulating blood by inhibiting the extrinsic apoptosis pathway. Furthermore, suspension stimulation-induced phosphorylation of STAT2, which promotes programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) transcription and inhibits the antitumor effects of immune cells by inhibiting the infiltration of CD8+T cells in tumors and the levels of secreted cytokines. In vivo inhibition of FXa with rivaroxaban reduced HCC metastasis by decreasing PD-L1 expression and exhausting tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Notably, the combination of rivaroxaban and anti-programmed death-1 monoclonal antibody (anti-PD-1) programmed Death-1 monoclonal antibody (anti-PD-1) induced synergistic antitumor effects in animal models. Most importantly, rivaroxaban improved the objective response rate of patients with HCC to immune checkpoint inhibitors and prolonged overall survival time. CONCLUSIONS: FXa-activated PAR-2 promotes anoikis resistance and immune escape in HCC, suggesting the potential for combining coagulation inhibitors and PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of HCC.

Andexanet Alfa Neutralizes the Anticoagulant Effects of Unfractionated Heparin of Bovine, Ovine and Porcine Origin Almost as Protamine Sulfate.

INTRODUCTION: Andexanet alfa (AA) - zhzo, recombinant coagulation factor Xa, is an approved antidote for oral Xa inhibitors (apixaban and rivaroxaban). Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is commonly used for therapeutic, interventional, and surgical indications. Protamine sulfate (PrSO4) is frequently used to neutralize UFH. This study aimed to investigate the comparative neutralization profiles of AA and PrSO4 for heparins of bovine, ovine, and porcine origin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The neutralization effect of PrSO4 at 25 µg/ml and AA at 100 µg/ml was studied on an approximate surgical/interventional concentration of heparin by supplementing whole blood with each of the heparins at 25 µg/ml. For the clotting profile (activated partial thromboplastin time: aPTT), amidolytic (anti-Xa and anti-IIa), and thrombin generation assay each of the heparin were supplemented from -10-0.62 µg/ml. RESULTS: In the whole blood ACT studies, all three heparins produced strong anti-coagulant effects (400-450 seconds) compared to saline (130-150 seconds). Both AA and PrSO4 almost fully neutralized the anti-coagulant effects of heparins (140-160 seconds). Both antidotes completely reversed the anticoagulant effects of all three heparins in the aPTT and thrombin generation assay. However, PrSO4 was more effective in neutralizing the anti-Xa, and anti-IIa effects than AA, which only partially neutralized these effects. CONCLUSION: Andexanet alfa at 100 µg/ml effectively neutralizes the therapeutic and surgical/interventional concentrations of heparins in in-vitro settings. While differences in the anti-Xa, and anti-IIa effects between heparins were noted, anti-coagulant effect of these agents in the aPTT assay were comparable. A similar neutralization profile was observed in the ACT and thrombin generation assays by both agents.

Use of Andexanet Alfa for Factor Xa Inhibitor Reversal in US Verified Trauma Centers: A National Survey.

Direct oral factor Xa inhibitors are replacing vitamin K-dependent antagonists as anticoagulation treatment in many clinical scenarios. Trauma centers are noting an increase in patients presenting on these medications. The 2018 Food and Drug Administration approval of andexanet alfa provides an alternative anticoagulation reversal. Barriers may limit utilization of new medications including a lack of grade 1A evidence supporting the use of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) versus andexanet alfa and cost. To evaluate barriers of andexanet alfa utilization by trauma surgeons, a 15-question survey was conducted. There was a 9% completion rate (n = 89). The results revealed 23.5% would choose andexanet alfa as first-line treatment in children, and 25.8% as first-line treatment in adults. The majority of respondents, 64.7% and 67.4%, would use PCC preferentially in children and adults, respectively. Respondents indicated that cost burden was an overriding factor (76.3%); 42.4% cited lack of high-level efficacy data of andexanet alfa for reversal of factor Xa inhibitors. Additional double-blinded multi-institutional randomized controlled trials comparing 4F-PCC and andexanet alfa for factor Xa inhibitor reversal are needed to support efficacy especially with the increased cost associated.

Andexanet Alfa: What We Have Learned from Clinical Trials and Real-World Data.

Andexanet alfa is a specific reversal agent for factor Xa inhibitors with immediate reversal of their anticoagulant effect. Andexanet alfa is currently approved for use in patients treated with rivaroxaban and apixaban who have life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding. New data from both controlled clinical trials and real-world experience are continuously being published, providing greater insight into the clinical characteristics of the drug, such as efficacy and safety. It is worth considering that andexanet alfa could be of benefit in a variety of different clinical scenarios where patients receiving treatment with apixaban and rivaroxaban (and endoxaban) have life-threatening conditions. These different clinical scenarios, which range from pre-treatment of urgent surgery, especially neurosurgical interventions, and concomitant use of andexanet alfa and prothrombin complex concentrate to onset of bleeding more than 6 h prior to admission, should be clarified as well as the issue of "low/high" dose of andexanet alfa and the need for baseline anti-Xa inhibitor levels measured by point-of-care testing. Finally, management of patients at high risk of thrombosis or recent arterial/venous thrombotic events needs to be further explored. In this current opinion, we address these urgent questions in the light of recent literature and clinical trial data.

Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate versus andexanet alfa for the reversal of traumatic brain injuries.

BACKGROUND: Andexanet alfa was approved in 2018 for reversal of direct oral anticoagulants but due to issues of cost and access, four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) continues to be used for this indication. The objective of this study is to evaluate outcomes of reversal with these agents in patients with isolated traumatic brain injuries (TBI). METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 35 trauma centres from 2014 to 2021. Patients were included with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)>2 for head and having received andexanet alfa or 4F-PCC within 24 hours of admission. Patients were excluded if P2Y12 inhibitor use or AIS>2 outside of head. Primary outcome includes rate of mortality/hospice at hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes include a composite of serious hospital complications. A subgroup analysis of severe TBI patients (AIS head 4 or 5) was completed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to account for differences in comorbidities and TBI severity. RESULTS: 4F-PCC was given to 265 patients with another 59 receiving andexanet alfa. Patients in the andexanet alfa group were more likely to have an AIS head score of 5 (47.5% vs 26.1%; p<0.005). After adjusting for severity of TBI and comorbidities with regard to tomortality/hospice, there were 15 (25.4%) patients in the andexanet alfa group and 49 (18.5%) in the 4F-PCC group (OR 1.34; 95% CI 0.67 to 2.71). This remained consistent when looking at severe patients with TBI with 12 (28.6%) andexanet alfa patients and 37 (28.7%) 4F-PCC patients (OR 0.93 (95% CI 0.40 to 2.16)). Severe hospital complications were also similar between groups with 5 (8.5%) andexanet alfa patients as compared with 21 (7.9%) 4F-PCC patients (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.36 to 2.88). CONCLUSION: There was no firm conclusion on the treatment effect in mortality/hospice or serious complications among isolated TBI patients reversed with 4F-PCC as compared with andexanet alfa.

Andexanet Alfa for the Reversal of Factor Xa Inhibitor Activity: Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of the ANNEXA-4 Study in Japan.

AIMS: Andexanet alfa, a specific antidote to factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors, has been approved for clinical use in several countries, including Japan, based on the results from the phase 3 trial ANNEXA-4. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of andexanet alfa treatment in FXa inhibitor-related acute major bleeding in patients enrolled for ANNEXA-4 in Japan. METHODS: This prespecified analysis included patients enrolled at Japanese sites in the prospective, open-label, single-arm ANNEXA-4 trial. Eligible patients had major bleeding within 18 hours of oral FXa inhibitor administration. The coprimary efficacy endpoints were percent change in anti-FXa activity and proportion of patients achieving excellent or good hemostatic efficacy 12 hours post-treatment. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were enrolled, all of whom had intracranial hemorrhage; 16 patients were evaluable for efficacy. Median percent reduction in anti-FXa activity from baseline to nadir was 95.4% in patients taking apixaban, 96.1% in patients taking rivaroxaban, and 82.2% in patients taking edoxaban. Overall, 14/16 patients (88%) achieved excellent or good hemostasis (apixaban, 5/5; rivaroxaban, 6/7; edoxaban, 3/4). Within 30 days, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs occurred in 2 and 5 patients, respectively. One patient died during follow-up, and 2 patients experienced thrombotic events. CONCLUSION: Treatment with andexanet alfa rapidly reduced anti-FXa activity with favorable hemostatic efficacy in Japanese patients with acute major bleeding. Serious AEs of thrombotic events during rapid reversal of anti-FXa activity arose as particular safety concerns in this population as with previous studies.

Comparative analysis of andexanet alfa and prothrombin complex concentrate in reversing anticoagulation by rivaroxaban ex vivo.

BACKGROUND: The comparative effectiveness of the specific antidote andexanet alfa vs the nonspecific therapy four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCCs) as reversal agents for direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors in severely bleeding patients is unclear. We hypothesised that specific reversal using andexanet alfa would be more effective than a high dose of PCC (50 IU kg-1) for reversing the FXa inhibitor rivaroxaban. METHODS: The reversal potential of andexanet alfa, various 4F-PCCs, and activated PCC was investigated ex vivo in human blood anticoagulated with rivaroxaban (37.5, 75, 150, and 300 ng ml-1) using a panel of coagulation parameters, including conventional coagulation assays, thrombin generation, and a newly developed viscoelastometric device. We simulated in vivo conditions of coagulation activation and fibrin formation using flow chamber experiments of thrombogenicity potential under arterial flow conditions. RESULTS: The 4F-PCCs normalised clotting profiles only at low rivaroxaban concentrations, whereas andexanet alfa and activated PCC significantly shortened clotting time at all rivaroxaban concentrations. Only andexanet alfa restored thrombin generation to baseline. Flow chamber results showed that various 4F-PCCs concentration-dependently restored clot formation. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to thrombin generation measurements, haemostatic reversal of rivaroxaban using high-dose 4F-PCCs exhibited similar efficacy as andexanet alfa in flow chamber experiments. The haemostatic effects of 4F-PCCs and andexanet alfa in the context of bleeding patients taking FXa inhibitors requires further study.

Characterization of an andexanet alfa administration protocol guided by drug-specific quantitative anti-Xa assays.

Following FDA approval in 2018, consensus guidelines recommend andexanet alfa as first-line therapy for the management of life-threatening or uncontrollable bleeding in patients taking oral factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors. Dosing is based on the specific FXa inhibitor and dose, and the time elapsed since the patient's last administration of the medication. Additionally, at our institution, anti-FXa screens and drug-specific assays are obtained to guide subsequent dosing based on institution protocol. The objective of this study was to evaluate andexanet alfa utilization based on anti-Xa and FXa-inhibitor-specific assays and assess associated outcomes. This was a retrospective, single-center study aimed to describe the use of anti-FXa and specific direct oral anticoagulant assays to guide the utilization and administration of andexanet alfa. Secondary endpoints evaluated included thrombotic events during index hospitalization, hospital length of stay, hospital mortality, and discharge disposition. Overall, most patients were prescribed apixaban for atrial fibrillation and received andexanet alfa for reversal of intracranial hemorrhage in the emergency department. In general, DOAC-specific assays were concordant with last known times; however, there appears to be minimal correlation with DOAC-specific assay levels and survival. There were 9 thrombotic events (8.7%) in 8 patients. In this cohort, collection of an anti-FXa assay screen was a practical strategy to guide reversal with andexanet alfa; however, the addition of DOAC-specific assay levels may not enhance clinical utility.