[Conflicts of interest and the ethics of developing fee-charging questionnaires].

　There are some fee-charged questionnaires in the social medicine field. If a questionnaire is fee-charged, the researcher developing it may have a financial incentive, and the existence of a conflict of interest should be considered. Therefore, when a manuscript reporting a fee-charged questionnaire is submitted, future fee-charging and the institution managing the questionnaire should be described as potential conflicts of interest. They should also be so described in forms for ethical review and informed consent.

Ethical Issues in Physician Billing Under Fee-For-Service Plans.

Medical ethics has become an important and recognized component of physician training. There is one area, however, in which medical students receive little guidance. There is practically no discussion of the financial aspects of medical practice. My objective in this paper is to initiate a discussion about the moral dimension of physician billing practices. I argue that physicians should expand their conception of professional responsibility in order to recognize that their moral obligations toward patients include a commitment to honest and forthright billing practices. I argue that physicians should aspire to a standard of clinical accuracy-not legal adequacy-in describing their activities. More generally, physicians should strive to promote an integrity-based professional culture, first and foremost by stigmatizing rather than celebrating creative billing practices, as well as condemning the misguided sense of solidarity that currently makes it taboo for physicians to criticize each other on this score.

Ferramenta referencial para elaboração de valores em ortodontia / Reference tool for preparing values in orthodontics

Com a difícil missão de estabelecer valores adequados dos serviços prestados na odontologia, e em frente a uma carência de informações específicas na literatura de classe a cerca deste assunto, o objetivo deste trabalho foi o desenvolvimento de uma ferramenta referencial para elaboração de valores, útil e simplificada na forma de um web aplicativo, a fim de guiar uma correta precificação, com a Ortodontia como especialidade eleita da pesquisa. Os materiais e métodos utilizados para o desenvolvimento deste estudo abordam variáveis direta e indiretamente influenciadoras do processo de formação dos preços, colocados estrategicamente dentro de um programa de dados criados em parceria com a Diretoria Técnica de Informática (DTI) da Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP). Como resultado a apresentação da FREVO (Ferramenta Referencial para Elaboração de Valores em Ortodontia) para facilitar na prática a formação dos honorários, de forma adaptável ao perfil de cada profissional, cliente e tipo de consultório, com a sugestão final de valores a serem praticados na área, que possam ser justificados com mais clareza, em frente a uma grande divergência de preços sem transparência, na prestação dos serviços oferecidos e realizados pelos cirurgiões dentistas. Conclui se que há uma enorme carência de dados na literatura odontológica sobre este assunto tão pertinente e necessário para a saúde financeira de qualquer negócio e que a utilização de aplicativos como a "FREVO" facilita a problemática de precificação(AU)

The thesis has researched and developed a reference framework, called FREVO (Ferramenta Referencial para Elaboração de Valores em Ortodontia), which is a web-based toolkit to guide the cost-effective pricing for Orthodontics. Currently, there is a lack of dental literature and adequate orthodontic pricing reference values when performing dentistry services. The materials and methods used for the development of this study address variables directly and indirectly influencing the price formation process. This data program was created in partnership with the Technical Directorate of Informatics (TDI) of the Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho "(UNESP). The FREVO toolkit helps estimate the orthodontic pricing reference value, which can be customizable and adaptable to the profile of each professional, client and type of dental office. It provides dental service transparency and the right recommendation of pricing values to be practiced by the dentists, given the vast discrepancy and lack of data available in the market. In conclusion, FREVO is therefore, a relevant toolkit to be used by any dentist professional in their day-to-day dental business to estimate the right orthodontics service pricing(AU)

Caveat Emptor: Predatory Publishers, Rogue Journals, and the Potential Corruption of Addiction Science.

The name predatory publisher has been applied by academic librarian Jeffrey Beall to describe an open-access, scholarly publishing business model in which publication fees are charged to authors without providing the editorial judgment, peer-review process, and publishing services associated with more established journals. In the addiction field, as many as 20 journal titles now operate according to this model, and most of their editors are either nonexistent or impossible to contact. Although predatory publishing should not be equated with open access, this article argues that predatory publishers are diluting scientific quality in the addiction field by taking advantage of the open-access movement. Beyond the damage done to the reputations of naive authors and figurehead editorial board members, there is a cascade of effects resulting from the shabby publication process itself. If the addiction field is to be protected from predatory publishers, all sectors need to be involved. Declarations of "buyer beware" and "the emperor has no clothes" are just the first steps in a process of preventing further damage to the integrity of addiction science. As described in this article, concerted action will be required by authors, editors, and professional societies.

The making of a moral economy: women's views of monetary transactions in an 'egg sharing for research' scheme.

There are growing debates about the appropriateness of offering money in exchange for the provision of bodily materials for clinical treatment and research. The bioethics literature and many practice guidelines have generally been opposed to such entanglement, depicting the use of money as contaminating, creating undue inducement, exploitation and commodification of the human body. However, two elements have been missing from these debates: (i) the perspectives of those people providing bodily materials when money is offered; and (ii) systematic empirical engagement with the notion of 'money' itself. This article seeks to fill those gaps in knowledge by providing detailed insights from a project investigating the views and experiences of women who volunteered to provide eggs for research in exchange for reduced fees for fertility treatment. Analysis of 29 semi-structured interviews reveals multiple ways in which volunteers reason through the involvement of 'money' in this domain and shows how their accounts diverge from pessimistic understandings of the role of monies in everyday life. When volunteers speak in detail about the monetary aspects of their participation they draw major, recurring, distinctions in five overlapping areas: their depiction of the monetized world of fertility treatment; their views of the different forms that money can take; a distancing of their actions from their understandings of how markets and commodities work; their location of the transactions within a particular clinic, and the ongoing importance of their eggs, post-transaction. This article: (i) responds to calls for concrete case studies to assist understandings of the inter-relationships of money and specific aspects of social life; (ii) adds to the sociology of money literature by providing empirical insights into how notions of money are deployed; (iii) presents much-needed perspectives from providers of bodily materials; and (iv) contributes to ongoing conversations between bioethics and sociology.

The cost of justice.

Recently introduced employment tribunal fees of up to £1,200 are costing unions and their members thousands of pounds a year, as well as limiting access to justice, experts say.

Survey on Ethical Conduct Thresholds in Cardiologal Medical Practice in Argentina.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the attitude of a group of cardiologists on the ethical conducts they would accept or adopt when encountered with different hypothetical situations of medical practice. Between August and September of 2011, 700 Argentine cardiologists were surveyed in situations which posed ethical dilemmas in the patient-physician relationship, among colleagues or involving financial agreements with employers or the pharmaceutical industry. Ethical conflicts were evidenced in a series of inappropriate conducts such as differential fees, trips and meals sponsored by laboratories, splitting fees, overbilling, self-referral, charging for patient referral, financial compensation for ordering medical procedures, and various situations derived from the relationship with employers. In general, financial compensation from the pharmaceutical industry was more accepted than the conflictive situations which directly involved patients, colleagues or employers. The rejection of these conducts, the physicians' deontological education and the improvement of financial and organizational conditions in medical practice will help to encourage better medical professionalism and avoid unseemly behaviors.

Ressarcimento das despesas de sujeitos de pesquisa: experiência de pesquisadores / Reimbursement of expenses to research subjects: Brazilian researchers experience

Objetivo: Conhecer a experiência e opinião de pesquisadores da área de ginecologia e Obstetrícia (GO) sobre o ressarcimento de despesas a sujeitos de pesquisa. Sujeitos e métodos: Estudo qualitativo em que se realizaram entrevistas semiestruturadas, por telefone, com sete pesquisadores-docentes de cinco programas de pós-graduação em GO de universidades paulistas. Realizou-se análise temática de conteúdo das entrevistas transcritas. Resultados: Cinco pesquisadores tinham experiência com estudos em que se fez o ressarcimento aos sujeitos, geralmente pago em dinheiro. Nenhum pesquisador referiu ter encontrado dificuldades para calcular o valor do ressarcimento porque isso era determinado pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa (CEP) ou pelas agências de fomento. O projeto da pesquisa havia sido aprovado por um CEP que não questionou o valor do ressarcimento proposto. Os participantes concordaram que, além de transporte e alimentação, também se deveria considerar o tempo, dia de trabalho, em que consistiria a participação da pessoa e a complexidade da pesquisa para calcular o valor do ressarcimento. Este não pode ser alto porque pode 'comprar a consciência' ou produzir uma 'mercantilização', mas, se for baixo, 'não vale a pena' participar. Conclusão: Os pesquisadores não dispõem de parâmetros oficiais, regulamentados, para estabelecerem o valor do ressarcimento em cada pesquisa. Reconhecem que é difícil estabelecer esse valor para não constrangerem as pessoas, mas, ao mesmo tempo, entendem que o ressarcimento pode motivá- las a participarem das pesquisas. Evidencia-se a necessidade ampliar a discussão a esse respeito para prover diretrizes mais claras aos pesquisadores (AU)

Objective: To assess the experience and opinion of the researchers in the area of Gynecology and Obstetrics about the reimbursement of expenses to the research subjects. Subjects and Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in which semi-structured interviews were done by telephone, with seven researchers-professors from five post-graduate programs in Obstetrics and Gynecology in São Paulo universities. Thematic content analysis from the transcribed interviews was conducted. Results: Five researchers had experience with studies in which the compensation was made to the subjects, usually paid in cash. No researcher reported having any difficult to calculate the amount of compensation because it was determined by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) or by any agency which is given the funds for the research. The research project was approved by an REC which did not make any question about the amount proposed. Participants agreed that in addition to transportation and food, it is convenient to also take into account the time, day job, what exactly would be the subject participation and the complexity of the survey to calculate the amount of compensation. This may not be high because it can 'buy the conscience' or produce a 'way of commerce'; even in cases it is low; however, if the compensation is so low the participants reported that 'it does not worth' to take part of the study. Discussion: The researchers have no official rules regulated, to establish the amount of compensation for each survey. They recognize that it is difficult to establish this value not to constrain people, but at the same time, understand that the compensation can motivate them to participate in the research. They highlights the need to broaden the discussion about it to provide clearer guidelines to researchers (AU)

No disponible

The ethics and regulation of overcharging: issues in the commerciality of the health practitioner-patient relationship.

Overcharging by health practitioners is a difficult issue with few guidelines available for practitioners or patients. For the most part it has not been the subject of disciplinary censure and has been dealt with by conciliation processes. However, during 2013 the Singapore High Court twice addressed the commerciality of the health-practitioner-patient relationship, acknowledging that this is a fundamental attribute of the contemporary dynamic between providers and recipients of health services. In Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council [2013] SGHC 122, it concluded that the obligation to refrain from overcharging is an inherent ethical responsibility of practitioners and affirmed the suspension for three years of a surgeon with Australian training and tertiary connections for what it classified as grossly excessive charging. In Pang Ah San v Singapore Medical Council [2013] SGHC 266, it observed that medical practitioners have a legitimate right to appropriate levels of remuneration but that the right balance has to be struck between professional virtues and business considerations. The Singapore High Court's decisions raise the question of whether professional associations and practitioner regulators have a responsibility to provide guidelines and, potentially, processes by which practical assistance can be provided to medical and other health care practitioners so that they can avoid unacceptable charging practices.

Should we perform kidney transplants on foreign nationals?

In Canada, there are currently no guidelines at either the federal or provincial level regarding the provision of kidney transplantation services to foreign nationals (FN). Renal transplant centres have, in the past, agreed to put refugee claimants and other FNs on the renal transplant waiting list, in part, because these patients (refugee claimants) had health insurance through the Interim Federal Health Programme to cover the costs of medication and hospital care. However, severe cuts recently made to this programme have forced clinicians to question whether they should continue with transplants for FNs, for financial and ethical reasons. This paper first examines different national policies (eg, in Canada, USA, France and the UK) to map the diversity of approaches regarding transplantation for FNs, and then works through different considerations commonly used to support or oppose the provision of organs to these patients: (1) the organ shortage; (2) the free-rider problem; (3) the risk of becoming a transplant destination; (4) the impact on organ donation rates; (5) physicians' duties; (6) economic concerns; (7) vulnerability. Using a Canadian case as a focus, and generalising through a review of various national policies, we analyse the arguments for and against transplantation for FNs with a view to bringing clarity to what is a sensitive political and clinical management issue. Our aim is to help transplant centres, clinicians and ethicists reflect on the merits of possible options, and the rationales behind them.

Universal health coverage and user charges.

There has been an explosion of interest in the concept of 'universal health coverage', fuelled by publication of the World Health Report 2010. This paper argues that the system of user charges for health services is a fundamental determinant of levels of coverage. A charge can lead to a loss of utility in two ways. Citizens who are deterred from using services by the charge will suffer an adverse health impact. And citizens who use the service will suffer a loss of wealth. The role of social health insurance is threefold: to reduce households' financial risk associated with sickness; to promote enhanced access to needed health services; and to contribute to societal equity objectives, through an implicit financial transfer from rich to poor and healthy to sick. In principle, an optimal user charge policy can ensure that the social health insurance funds are used to best effect in pursuit of these objectives. This paper calls for a fundamental rethink of attitudes and policy towards user charges.