Risk of complications and implant survival of surgical treatment of proximal femoral metastasis: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The patients with femoral metastasis in the inter- or subtrochanteric area could be treated with intramedullary nailing or prosthetic reconstruction, however, it is controversial which surgical treatment could offer less complications and implant failure. Our purpose was to define the risk of complications and implant survival in patients treated with intramedullary nailing or prosthetic reconstruction. METHODS: We analyzed studies reporting the risk of complications, reoperations and removal of the implant in patients treated with intramedullary nailing, hemiarthroplasty, arthroplasty or megaprosthesis. RESULTS: We analyzed 27 studies (1346 patients) reporting patients treated with intramedullary nail (51%), hemiarthroplasty (15%), arthroplasty (2%), megaprosthesis with (25%) or without (7%) acetabular component. No difference was found in the overall risk of complications between patients treated with intramedullary nailing 6%, hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty 7% and megaprosthesis 11% (p = 0.23). However, patients treated with megaprosthesis had increased risk of reoperation due to infection (70%), compared to the patients treated with intramedullary nail (13%), and patients treated with hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty (23%) (p = 0.02). Revision due to disease progression was required in 61% of the patients treated with intramedullary nail, but not in patients treated with hemiarthroplasty, total arthroplasty, and megaprosthesis (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Patients treated with megaprosthesis had higher risk of reoperation due to infection, while patients treated with intramedullary nailing had higher risk of revision due to disease progression. Regarding patients treated with megaprosthesis, the risk of reoperation due to dislocation was higher in those treated with acetabular component.

Use of tranexamic acid is not associated with complications following bipolar hemiarthroplasty for metastatic disease.

INTRODUCTION: Advances in the care of cancer patients have resulted in increased survival. The proximal femur is a common site for metastatic disease, often requiring surgical intervention. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has proven to be safe in elective and traumatic femoral hemiarthroplasty; however, its use has not been investigated in oncologic patients. METHOD: We reviewed 66 patients (37 males) with a mean age of 64 ± 3 years undergoing a hemiarthroplasty for metastatic disease in the femoral neck. A total of 22 (33%) patients received intraoperative TXA. Primary outcomes included postoperative blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative transfusion requirement, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: There was no difference in the baseline characteristics between the TXA and non-TXA groups. When comparing the TXA and non-TXA groups, there were no differences in 72 h postoperative blood loss between groups (1.21 L vs. 1.33 L, p = 0.61), percentage of patients requiring transfusion (36.4% vs. 36.4%, p = 1.0), or the incidence of postoperative complications including venous thromboembolism (14% vs. 11%, p = 0.70) and pulmonary embolism (0% vs. 5%, p = 1.0). CONCLUSION: Oncology patients are a high-risk population for thromboembolic events. This initial study supports the safe use of TXA intraoperatively in femoral hemiarthroplasty performed for metastatic disease.

Image-guided Percutaneous Fixation with Internal Cemented Screws of Impending Femoral Neck Pathologic Fractures in Patients with Metastatic Cancer: Safety, Efficacy, and Durability.

Background Prophylactic image-guided procedures performed by interventional radiologists for impending pathologic fractures are becoming more pertinent, as patients with metastatic cancer have extended overall survival because of advanced therapies. Purpose To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and palliative durability of collimated-beam CT-guided percutaneous fixation with internal cemented screws (FICS) for impending pathologic fractures of the femoral neck. Materials and Methods This single-institute retrospective study examined all patients with metastatic cancer treated between February 2010 and October 2019 with collimated-beam CT-guided percutaneous FICS procedures for preventive consolidation of impending femoral neck pathologic fractures. The short-term palliative efficacy was assessed through comparison of visual analog scale (VAS) scores before and 1 month after FICS. A review of cross-section imaging and clinic reports identified any procedural complications. Long-term consolidation efficacy was defined as the absence of any screw dislodgement or development of a pathologic fracture at completion of the study. The Wilcoxon test was used for the mean comparison of paired nonparametric variables. Results Sixty-one consecutive patients (mean age, 59 years ± 11 [standard deviation]; 35 women) underwent preventive FICS for consolidation of impending pathologic femoral neck fracture with a mean follow-up of 533 days ± 689. Two patients died of cancer within the first month. Complications were limited to three self-resolving hematomas. The mean VAS score decreased 1 month after FICS from 4.2 ± 3.2 to 1.8 ± 2.0 (P < .001). The long-term consolidation efficacy was 92% (54 of 59 patients), with three of 59 patients (5%) subsequently developing fractures despite FICS and an additional two of 59 patients (3%) with durable FICS undergoing definitive total hip arthroplasty surgery because of local tumor progression. Conclusion Percutaneous fixation with internal cemented screws as performed by the interventional radiologist is a safe nonsurgical treatment that provides an effective palliative result and durable prevention for impending pathologic fractures of the femoral neck. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT in primary prostate cancer compared to conventional nodal and distant staging: a retrospective single center study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the impact of Gallium-68 [68Ga] labeled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT) compared with conventional imaging on staging and clinical management of men evaluated for primary prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: Men with newly diagnosed biopsy-proven PCa who had been staged with a conventional staging protocol including bone scintigraphy (BS) and additionally underwent [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT, were evaluated retrospectively. Imaging findings from BS, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or CT were categorized regarding locoregional nodal (N) and distant metastasis (M) status as negative, positive or equivocal before and after addition of the information of PET/CT. Also, the imaging-based level of confidence (LoC) in correct assessment of N and M status was scored. Impact of PET/CT on clinical management was evaluated by the percentage of treatment category changes after PET/CT as determined in the multidisciplinary tumour board. RESULTS: Sixty-four men with intermediate and high-risk PCa were evaluated. With additional information of PET/CT, N status was upstaged in 23%, and downstaged in 9%. M status was upstaged in 13%, and downstaged in 23%. A net increase in LoC of 20% was noted, mainly regarding M status. Treatment category changed from palliative to curative in 9%, and from curative to palliative in 3%. An undecided treatment plan changed to curative in 14%, as well as to palliative in another 9%. In total, a 36% treatment category change was noted. High negative predictive value of PET/CT for M status was indicated by 27 patients that underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and reached postoperative biochemical disease-free status or had a likely other site of disease recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: PSMA PET/CT can cause considerable changes in N and M staging, as well as in management compared to conventional staging. Findings of this study support the replacement of BS and CT by PSMA PET/CT in staging primary PCa.

Current surgical management of metastatic pathological fractures of the femur: A multicentre snapshot audit.

AIMS: We aimed to find out: the typical workload for metastatic bone disease, the conventional treatment for femoral metastases and whether there is a trend for arthroplasty and endoprosthetic reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All sequential patients undergoing surgery for femoral metastatic lesions (both pathological fracture and impending pathological fracture) of any age patient were included in the multicenter snapshot audit. Data on demographics, institutions and operative procedures were recorded. RESULTS: 24 UK Institutions were enrolled, including 7 Major Trauma Centres (MTCs). It was a 2 month audit from 1stMarch 2018. 95 cases were recorded. The mean age was 71 and 65% were female. 66 patients had a fracture at presentation and 23 an impending fracture. Breast carcinoma was the primary tumour at 23%. The mean Mirel's score is 9. The commonest fixation was with a long cephalomedullary nail (38%). Endoprostheses accounted for 24%. None of the endoprostheses were implanted at MTCs. CONCLUSION: This audit revealed large numbers of cases of femoral metastases. Although the use of endoprostheses may be increasing in Trauma Units, intramedullary nailing still predominates. Future pathways may benefit from directing resources to allow greater arthroplasty.

When and where do patients with bone metastases actually break their femurs?

AIMS: Accurate estimations of the risk of fracture due to metastatic bone disease in the femur is essential in order to avoid both under-treatment and over-treatment of patients with an impending pathological fracture. The purpose of the current retrospective in vivo study was to use CT-based finite element analyses (CTFEA) to identify a clear quantitative differentiating factor between patients who are at imminent risk of fracturing their femur and those who are not, and to identify the exact location of maximal weakness where the fracture is most likely to occur. METHODS: Data were collected on 82 patients with femoral metastatic bone disease, 41 of whom did not undergo prophylactic fixation. A total of 15 had a pathological fracture within six months following the CT scan, and 26 were fracture-free during the five months following the scan. The Mirels score and strain fold ratio (SFR) based on CTFEA was computed for all patients. A SFR value of 1.48 was used as the threshold for a pathological fracture. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predicted values for Mirels score and SFR predictions were computed for nine patients who fractured and 24 who did not, as well as a comparison of areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC of the ROC curves). RESULTS: The sensitivity of SFR was 100% compared with 88% for the Mirels score, and the specificity of SFR was 67% compared with 38% for the Mirels score. The AUC was 0.905 for SFR compared with 0.578 for the Mirels score (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: All the patients who sustained a pathological fracture of the femur had an SFR of > 1.48. CTFEA was far better at predicting the risk of fracture and its location accurately compared with the Mirels score. CTFEA is quick and automated and can be incorporated into the protocol of CT scanners. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(5):638-645.

Capicua Transcriptional Repressor-Rearranged Undifferentiated Round Cell Sarcoma Metastatic to the Brain Treated with Surgery and Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

BACKGROUND: Ewing-like sarcoma with capicua transcriptional repressor (CIC) rearrangement is a unique class of undifferentiated round cell sarcomas characterized by CIC-double homeobox 4 gene fusion. Despite showing great histologic resemblance to Ewing sarcomas, they have proved to be a distinct pathological entity from the immunohistochemistry and genetic examinations and the response to treatment. We have presented a case of CIC-rearranged Ewing-like sarcoma with cerebral metastasis managed with operative resection and gamma knife radiosurgery. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 56-year-old woman had initially presented with an ulcerating lesion of the right fifth toe. The histological and immunohistochemical analysis revealed features consistent with CIC-rearranged Ewing-like sarcoma, which was confirmed with genetic analysis. Despite aggressive local control and a multidrug chemotherapy regimen, the patient developed multifocal metastases involving the lungs, femur, and cerebrum. The cerebral lesions were managed with surgery and gamma knife radiosurgery, with mixed results. CONCLUSION: CIC-rearranged Ewing-like sarcomas have recently been recognized as a distinct disease entity with a highly aggressive course. Treatment paradigms have yet to be defined to properly manage such an aggressive pathological process.

The Metastatic Early Prognostic (MEP) score.

AIMS: The early mortality in patients with hip fractures from bony metastases is unknown. The objectives of this study were to quantify 30- and 90-day mortality in patients with proximal femoral metastases, and to create a mortality prediction tool based on biomarkers associated with early death. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients referred to the orthopaedic department at a UK trauma centre with a proximal femoral metastasis (PFM) over a seven-year period (2010 to 2016). The study group were compared to a matched control group of non-metastatic hip fractures. Minimum follow-up was one year. RESULTS: There was a 90-day mortality of 46% in patients with metastatic hip fractures versus 12% in controls (89/195 and 24/192, respectively; p < 0.001). Mean time to surgery was longer in symptomatic metastases versus complete fractures (9.5 days (SD 19.8) and 3.4 days (SD 11.4), respectively; p < 0.05). Albumin, urea, and corrected calcium were all independent predictors of early mortality and were used to generate a simple tool for predicting 90-day mortality, titled the Metastatic Early Prognostic (MEP) score. An MEP score of 0 was associated with the lowest risk of death at 30 days (14%, 3/21), 90 days (19%, 4/21), and one year (62%, 13/21). MEP scores of 3/4 were associated with the highest risk of death at 30 days (56%, 5/9), 90 days (100%, 9/9), and one year (100%, 9/9). Neither age nor primary cancer diagnosis was an independent predictor of mortality at 30 and 90 days. CONCLUSION: This score could be used to predict early mortality and guide perioperative counselling. The delay to surgery identifies a potential window to intervene and correct these abnormalities with the aim of improving survival. Cite this article: Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(1):72-81.

CT guidance assisted by electromagnetic navigation system for percutaneous fixation by internal cemented screws (FICS).

PURPOSE: To evaluate electromagnetic navigation system (ENS) for percutaneous fixation by internal cemented screw (FICS) under CT guidance. BACKGROUND: FICS is a recently developed modality that consists in inserting screws, under imaging guidance, into bone through a minimal skin incision. FICS recently showed good efficacy for the palliation or prevention of pathologic fractures of the pelvic ring and femoral neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, we reviewed all consecutive cancer patients treated with percutaneous FICS under ENS-assisted CT guidance for the prevention or palliation of pelvic or femoral neck fractures. The primary endpoint was technical success. Secondary endpoints were screw placement accuracy (defined by proximal deviation p, distal deviation d, and angle deviation θ), radiation dose exposure, number of CT acquisitions, duration of procedures, and complications. RESULTS: Mean duration of FICS procedures was 111 ± 51 min. Mean post-procedure hospitalization length was 2.1 days. Technical success was achieved in 48 cases (96%) with a total of 76 screws inserted. Mean distance p, mean distance d, and mean angle θ were respectively 8.0 ± 4.5 mm, 7.5 ± 4.4 mm, and 5.4 ± 2°. Angle θ accuracy was higher for screws with a craniocaudal angulation of less than 20° (4.4° vs 6.4°, p = 0.02). The mean number of CT acquisitions during procedures was 6.4 ± 3.0. The mean dose length product was 1524 ± 953 mGy cm and the mean dose area product was 12 ± 8 Gy cm2. Five complications occurred in 4 patients. CONCLUSION: CT guidance assisted by ENS is an effective approach for percutaneous FICS. KEY POINTS: • ENS-assisted CT enables screw insertion in the pelvic ring and femoral neck, with a wide range of trajectories, even when a significant craniocaudal angulation is required. • ENS-assisted CT can be used as an alternative to CBCT guidance for percutaneous fixation by internal cemented screw. • ENS-assisted CT provides high technical success rate with excellent placement accuracy.

Prediction of the pathological fracture risk during stance and fall-loading configurations for metastases in the proximal femur, using a computed tomography-based finite element method.

BACKGROUND: It is important to assess the fracture risk associated with metastasis in the proximal femur. The study aimed to clarify the effect of tumor location on the risk of pathological fracture of the proximal femur and investigate the fracture risk not only in the stance-loading configuration (SC), but also in the fall-loading configuration (FC) using a computed tomography (CT)-based finite element (FE) method based on a simulated metastatic model. METHODS: The axial CT scans of the proximal femora of non-osteoporotic healthy men (n = 4; age range, 42-48 years) and osteoporotic post-menopausal women (n = 4; age range, 69-78 years) were obtained with a calibration phantom, from which the three-dimensional FE models were constructed. A single 15-mm-diameter spherical void simulating a tumor was created at various locations from the neck to subtrochanteric level. Nonlinear FE analyses were performed. RESULTS: The mean predicted fracture loads without spherical voids in the SC were 7700 N in men and 4370 N in women. With the void at the medial femoral neck and in the region anteromedial to lesser trochanter, the mean predicted fracture load significantly reduced to 51.3% and 59.4% in men and 34.1% and 64.5% in women, respectively. The mean predicted fracture loads without a spherical void in the FC were 2500 N in men and 1862 N in women. With the void at the medial and posterior femoral neck, the predicted fracture load was significantly reduced to 65.7% and 79.7% in men and 48.3% and 65.4% in women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results showed that the risk of pathologic fracture was quite high in both the SC and FC when the lytic lesion existed along the principal compressive trabecular trajectory or posterior neck. Prophylactic intervention should be considered for metastases at these locations.

MRI examination of resected malignant bone tumor can be an option for assessment of the osseous surgical margin.

OBJECTIVE: Confirming the surgical osseous margin of a resected malignant bone tumor macroscopically before reconstruction with a prosthesis is ideal. However, making the cut-surface of the femur specimen during surgery is difficult because of the hard bone tissue. In order to resolve this problem, the possibility of intraoperative MRI was considered. METHODS: MRI was performed at the surgical unit for five malignant femoral bone tumors that included two osteosarcomas and one undifferentiated high-grade sarcoma, and two metastatic tumors immediately after the tumor resection. The specimens were prepared in plastic containers with saline. RESULTS: The osseous surgical margins were confirmed to be those planned pre-operatively in all cases without metal-induced artifacts. The T1 weighted image (WI) was useful for evaluation of the osseous surgical margin, whereas the T2WI was useful for confirmation of extraosseous soft-tissue. CONCLUSION: The MRI was performed post-operatively as a preliminary evaluation of the technique. However, a limited sequence (i.e. coronal T1WI) with short examination time could be performed during surgery for the sole purpose of assessing the osseous margin. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: MRI examination of a resected malignant bone tumor specimen has not been reported, and can be an option for assessment of the osseous surgical margin.

Unusual Bone Lesions with Osteonecrosis Mimicking Bone Metastasis of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa.

Some bone lesions are reported to mimic bone metastasis on imaging tests. Herein, we report a case of a 55-year-old Japanese man who presented with a skin tumor on the left lower extremity. He also had a history of recurrent generalized cutaneous blister and erosion formation since childhood. His skin lesions were diagnosed as cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma complicated by recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Magnetic resonance imaging of the left lower extremity detected multiple focal bone lesions mimicking bone metastases in the left femur and tibia. However, bone biopsy revealed that the bone lesions were osteonecrosis without tumor cells. We suggest that cancer-induced osteonecrosis should be included in the differential diagnosis of bone lesions suspected of being metastases on magnetic resonance imaging.

Reconstrucción con prótesis modulares posterior a una resección oncológica. Evaluación de los fracasos y análisis de la supervivencia / Modular prosthesis reconstruction after tumour resection, evaluation of failures and survival

Objetivo: Analizar una serie de pacientes oncológicos tratados con prótesis modulares y evaluar: 1) Supervivencia del implante. 2) Causas de fracaso. 3) Tasa de reintervención. 4) Supervivencia del miembro. 5) Resultados funcionales y tiempo hasta la carga completa. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda retrospectiva en una base de datos oncológica entre marzo de 2001 y agosto de 2015 de pacientes con tumores óseos y pacientes con cirugía de revisión de trasplantes óseos reconstruidos con endoprótesis. Se incluyó a 106 pacientes con seguimiento mínimo de 2 años. Se dividió la población en 3 grupos: grupo 1, tumores óseos primarios; grupo 2, metástasis ósea; grupo 3, revisiones de trasplantes óseos masivos. Las causas de fracasos fueron clasificadas según Henderson et al. (2014) y la funcionalidad se evaluó según el la escala de la Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS). Se realizó análisis demográfico, estimación de la supervivencia y se compararon las diferencias entre grupos. Resultados: El seguimiento medio de los pacientes fue de 68 meses. La edad promedio fue de 43 años. La supervivencia global del implante fue del 86% a 2 años (IC 95%: 79-94) y del 73% a 5 años (IC 95%: 60-80). Diecinueve pacientes (18%) presentaron fracaso protésico, con revisión. La conservación del miembro en nuestra serie fue del 96% a 5 años(IC 95%: 91-99). Los resultados funcionales promedio según la escala de la MSTS fueron de 24 y el tiempo medio para carga completa de 2, 3 semanas. Conclusión: La cirugía de conservación de miembro representa el tratamiento de elección en pacientes con tumores óseos y la reconstrucción con endoprótesis resulta una alternativa válida, con índices de fracaso similares a otras reconstrucciones

Objective: To analyze a series of patients with bone tumours reconstructed with modular prostheses and to evaluate: 1) Survival of the implant. 2) Causes of failure. 3) Complication rates. 4) Limb salvage overall survival. 5) Functional results and full weight bearing. Materials and methods: A retrospective study from longitudinally maintained oncology databases was undertaken. All patients with bone tumours reconstructed with endoprosthesis were analysed. A toal of 106patients matched the inclusion criteria. They were divided into groups: group 1, primary bone tumours; group 2, bone metastasis; group 3, osteoarticular allograft reconstruction revisions. The type of failures were classified according to Henderson et al. (2014) and functional results assessed by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS). Demographic analysis, survival and the differences between groups were recorded. Result: The mean follow-up of the patients was 68 months. Mean age was 43 years. Overall implant survival was 86.4% at 2 years (95% CI: 79-94) and 73% at 5 years (95% CI: 60-80). Nineteen patients (18%) developed a prosthetic failure. The limb salvage overall survival was 96% at 5 years (95% CI: 91-99). The mean functional results according to the MSTS was 24 and mean time to full weight bearing was 2.3 weeks. Conclusions: Limb conservation surgery and endosprosthetic reconstruction is a valid option for patients with bone tumours with failure rates similar to other reconstruction methods

Modular prosthesis reconstruction after tumour resection, evaluation of failures and survival. / Reconstrucción con prótesis modulares posterior a una resección oncológica. Evaluación de los fracasos y análisis de la supervivencia.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze a series of patients with bone tumours reconstructed with modular prostheses and to evaluate: 1) Survival of the implant. 2) Causes of failure. 3) Complication rates. 4) Limb salvage overall survival. 5) Functional results and full weight bearing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study from longitudinally maintained oncology databases was undertaken. All patients with bone tumours reconstructed with endoprosthesis were analysed. A toal of 106patients matched the inclusion criteria. They were divided into groups: group 1, primary bone tumours; group 2, bone metastasis; group 3, osteoarticular allograft reconstruction revisions. The type of failures were classified according to Henderson et al. (2014) and functional results assessed by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS). Demographic analysis, survival and the differences between groups were recorded. RESULT: The mean follow-up of the patients was 68 months. Mean age was 43 years. Overall implant survival was 86.4% at 2 years (95% CI: 79-94) and 73% at 5 years (95% CI: 60-80). Nineteen patients (18%) developed a prosthetic failure. The limb salvage overall survival was 96% at 5 years (95% CI: 91-99). The mean functional results according to the MSTS was 24 and mean time to full weight bearing was 2.3 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Limb conservation surgery and endosprosthetic reconstruction is a valid option for patients with bone tumours with failure rates similar to other reconstruction methods.

Comparison of bone lesion distribution between prostate cancer and multiple myeloma with whole-body MRI.

PURPOSE: To assess the distribution of bone lesions in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and those with multiple myeloma (MM) using whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); and to assess the added value of four anatomical regions located outside the thoraco-lumbo-pelvic area to detect the presence of bone lesions in a patient-based perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients (50 men; mean age, 67±10 [SD] years; range, 59-87 years) with PCa and forty-seven patients (27 women, 20 men; mean age, 62.5±9 [SD] years; range, 47-90 years) with MM were included. Three radiologists assessed bone involvement in seven anatomical areas reading all MRI sequences. RESULTS: In patients with PCa, there was a cranio-caudal increasing prevalence of metastases (22% [11/50] in the humeri and cervical spine to 60% [30/50] in the pelvis). When the thoraco-lumbo-pelvic region was not involved, the prevalence of involvement of the cervical spine, proximal humeri, ribs, or proximal femurs was 0% in patients with PCa and≥4% (except for the cervical spine, 0%) in those with MM. CONCLUSION: In patients with PCa, there is a cranio-caudal positive increment in the prevalences of metastases and covering the thoraco-lumbo-pelvic area is sufficient to determine the metastatic status of a patient with PCa. In patients with MM, there is added value of screening all regions, except the cervical spine, to detect additional lesions.

Should the Use of Biologic Agents in Patients With Renal and Lung Cancer Affect Our Surgical Management of Femoral Metastases?

BACKGROUND: Biologic agents may prolong survival of patients with certain kidney and lung adenocarcinomas that have metastasized to bone, and patient response to these agents should be considered when choosing between an endoprosthesis and internal fixation for surgical treatment of femoral metastases. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Among patients undergoing surgery for femoral metastases of lung or renal cell carcinoma, (1) Does survival differ between patients who receive only cytotoxic chemotherapy and those who either respond or do not respond to biologic therapy? (2) Does postsurgical incidence of local disease progression differ between groups stratified by systemic treatment and response? (3) Does implant survival differ among groups stratified by systemic treatment and response? METHODS: From our institutional longitudinally maintained orthopaedic database, patients were identified by a query initially identifying all patients who carried a diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma or lung carcinoma. Patients who underwent internal fixation or prosthetic reconstruction between 2000 and 2016 for pathologic fracture of the femur and who survived ≥ 1 year after surgery were studied. Patients who received either traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy or a biologic agent were included. Patients were classified as responders or nonresponders to biologic agents based on whether they had clinical and imaging evidence of a response recorded on two consecutive office visits over ≥ 6 months. Endpoints were overall survival from the time of diagnosis, survival after the femoral operation, evidence of disease progression in the femoral operative site, and symptomatic local disease progression for which revision surgery was necessary. Our analysis included 148 patients with renal (n = 26) and lung (n = 122) adenocarcinoma. Fifty-one patients received traditional chemotherapy only. Of 97 patients who received a biologic agent, 41 achieved a response (stabilization/regression of visceral metastases), whereas 56 developed disease progression. We analyzed overall patient survival with the Kaplan-Meier method and used the log-rank test to identify significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups. RESULTS: One-year survival after surgery among patients responsive to biologic therapy was 61% compared with 20% among patients nonresponsive to biologics (p < 0.001) and 10% among those who received chemotherapy only (p < 0.009). With the number of patients we had to study, we could not detect any difference in local progression of femoral disease associated with systemic treatment and response. Radiologic evidence of periimplant local disease progression developed in three (7%) of 41 patients who responded to biologic treatment, two (3%) of 56 patients nonresponsive to biologics, and one (2%) of 51 patients treated with traditional chemotherapy. With the numbers of patients we had, we could not detect a difference in patients who underwent revision. All three patients responsive to biologics who developed local recurrence underwent revision, whereas the two without a response to biologics did not. CONCLUSIONS: Biologic therapy improves the overall longevity of some patients with lung and renal metastases to the femur in whom a visceral disease response occurred. In our limited cohort, we could not demonstrate an implant survival difference between such patients and those with shorter survival who may have had more aggressive disease. However, an increased life expectancy beyond 1 year among patients responsive to biologics may increase risk of mechanical failure of fixation constructs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Functional recovery after surgical stabilization and postoperative radiotherapy due to metastases of long bones.

PURPOSE: To reinvestigate the functional recovery after combined treatment with surgery and postoperative irradiation of complete or impending pathologic fractures of long bones. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the results of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) carried out after 68 orthopedic stabilization procedures (femur, n = 55, 80.8%; humerus, n = 13, 19.2%) for actual or impending pathological fracture of long bone in 61 patients with skeletal metastases. The mean normalized total dose was 34.7 ± 7.8 Gy. Endpoints were patient's functional status (FS; 1 = normal pain free status; 2 = normal use with pain; 3 = significantly limited used; 4 = nonfunctional status), a need for a secondary procedure to the same site and overall survival following surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 75% of patients achieved normal functional status (FS 1-2) within 12 weeks after surgery. Functional recovery in surviving patients reached 93%. Median survival was 17 months (95% confidence interval 13.7-20.2). Secondary surgical intervention at the same location was necessary in 3 patients (4.4%). On multivariate analysis, only general status (p = 0.011) and growing potential of primary tumor (p = 0.049) were associated with achieving normal functional status within 12 weeks after surgery and radiotherapy. The applied radiation schemes demonstrated a comparable impact on functional recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the effectiveness of stabilizing surgery and fractionated postoperative radiotherapy in terms of functional recovery, supporting prior results assessing postsurgical radiotherapy versus follow-up. The patient's general status is a strong prognostic factor for functional recovery. Rapidly growing tumors may hinder achievement of a normal functional status.

Beyond Mirels: Factors Influencing Surgical Outcome of Metastasis to the Extremities in the Modern Era.

Mirels scoring system for determining prophylactic stabilization need of skeletal metastases includes a limited number of variables and does not differentiate between procedure types. This study sought to identify additional variables associated with surgical failure, radiographic disease progression, and patient survival. A retrospective review was performed of patients from January 2004 to 2014 who underwent surgical treatment of skeletal metastases of the extremities, were >18 years of age, and had adequate radiographic surveillance. Eighty-nine metastatic bone lesions in 77 patients were included. Mirels score >8 (p = .015) and tumor origin (p = .008) were associated with surgical failure, which was 16.8%. Male gender (p < .001) and use of bone cement (p = .019) were associated with radiographic progression, 43.8% overall. Antiresorptive medications usage (p = .02) was associated with survival. The study concluded that tumor origin may be highly important when considering surgical treatment for metastatic bone disease and antiresorptive medications should be used postoperatively, given an association with survival. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 27(3):178-186, 2018).