Longitudinal outcomes of obeticholic acid therapy in ursodiol-nonresponsive primary biliary cholangitis: Stratifying the impact of add-on fibrates in real-world practice.

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid occurs in 40% of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients, affecting survival. Achieving a deep response (normalisation of alkaline phosphatase [ALP] and bilirubin ≤0.6 upper limit of normal) improves survival. Yet, the long-term effectiveness of second-line treatments remains uncertain. AIMS: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of obeticholic acid (OCA) ± fibrates. Focusing on biochemical response (ALP ≤1.67 times the upper limit of normal, with a decrease of at least 15% from baseline and normal bilirubin levels), normalisation of ALP, deep response and biochemical remission (deep response plus aminotransferase normalisation). METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal, observational, multicentre study involving ursodeoxyccholic acid non-responsive PBC patients (Paris-II criteria) from Spain and Portugal who received OCA ± fibrates. RESULTS: Of 255 patients, median follow-up was 35.1 months (IQR: 20.2-53). The biochemical response in the whole cohort was 47.2%, 61.4% and 68.6% at 12, 24 and 36 months. GLOBE-PBC and 5-year UK-PBC scores improved (p < 0.001). Triple therapy (ursodeoxycholic acid plus OCA plus fibrates) had significantly higher response rates than dual therapy (p = 0.001), including ALP normalisation, deep response and biochemical remission (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, triple therapy remained independently associated with biochemical response (p = 0.024), alkaline phosphatase normalisation, deep response and biochemical remission (p < 0.001). Adverse effects occurred in 41.2% of cases, leading to 18.8% discontinuing OCA. Out of 55 patients with cirrhosis, 12 developed decompensation. All with baseline portal hypertension. CONCLUSION: Triple therapy was superior in achieving therapeutic goals in UDCA-nonresponsive PBC. Decompensation was linked to pre-existing portal hypertension.

Contrast-specific propensity scores for causal inference with multiple interventions.

Existing methods that use propensity scores for heterogeneous treatment effect estimation on non-experimental data do not readily extend to the case of more than two treatment options. In this work, we develop a new propensity score-based method for heterogeneous treatment effect estimation when there are three or more treatment options, and prove that it generates unbiased estimates. We demonstrate our method on a real patient registry of patients in Singapore with diabetic dyslipidemia. On this dataset, our method generates heterogeneous treatment recommendations for patients among three options: Statins, fibrates, and non-pharmacological treatment to control patients' lipid ratios (total cholesterol divided by high-density lipoprotein level). In our numerical study, our proposed method generated more stable estimates compared to a benchmark method based on a multi-dimensional propensity score.

Fibrate and the risk of cardiovascular disease among moderate chronic kidney disease patients with primary hypertriglyceridemia.

Introduction: Hypertriglyceridemia is the most prevalent dyslipidemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, research about fibrate treatment in CKD patients is limited, and assessing its benefits becomes challenging due to the frequent concurrent use of statins. Thus, this study is aimed to investigate the role of fibrate in CKD stage 3 patients with hypertriglyceridemia who did not receive other lipid-lowering agents. Methods: This study enrolled patients newly diagnosed CKD3 with LDL-C<100mg/dL and had never received statin or other lipid-lowering agents from Chang Gung Research Database. The participants were categorized into 2 groups based on the use of fibrate: fibrate group and non-fibrate group (triglyceride >200mg/dL but not receiving fibrate treatment). The inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed to balance baseline characteristics. Results: Compared with the non-fibrate group (n=2020), the fibrate group (n=705) exhibited significantly lower risks of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) (10.4% vs. 12.8%, hazard ratios [HRs]: 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50 to 0.95), AMI (2.3% vs. 3.9%, HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.73), and ischemic stroke (6.3% vs. 8.0%, HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52 to 0.85). The risk of all-cause mortality (5.1% vs. 4.5%, HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.67 to 1.79) and death from CV (2.8% vs. 2.3%, HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.29 to 2.33) did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Conclusion: This study suggests that, in moderate CKD patients with hypertriglyceridemia but LDL-C < 100mg/dL who did not take other lipid-lowering agents, fibrates may be beneficial in reducing cardiovascular events.

Use of drugs for hyperlipidaemia and diabetes and risk of primary and secondary brain tumours: nested case-control studies using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have suggested that fibrates and glitazones may have a role in brain tumour prevention. We examined if there is support for these observations using primary care records from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). DESIGN: We conducted two nested case-control studies using primary and secondary brain tumours identified within CPRD between 2000 and 2016. We selected cases and controls among the population of individuals who had been treated with any anti-diabetic or anti-hyperlipidaemic medication to reduce confounding by indication. SETTING: Adults older than 18 years registered with a general practitioner in the UK contributing data to CPRD. RESULTS: We identified 7496 individuals with any brain tumour (4471 primary; 3025 secondary) in total. After restricting cases and controls to those prescribed any anti-diabetic or anti-hyperlipidaemic medication, there were 1950 cases and 7791 controls in the fibrate and 480 cases with 1920 controls in the glitazone analyses. Longer use of glitazones compared with all other anti-diabetic medications was associated with a reduced risk of primary (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.89 per year, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.98), secondary (aOR 0.87 per year, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.99) or combined brain tumours (aOR 0.88 per year, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.95). There was little evidence that fibrate exposure was associated with risk of either primary or secondary brain tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Longer exposure to glitazones was associated with reduced primary and secondary brain tumour risk. Further basic science and population-based research should explore this finding in greater detail, in terms of replication and mechanistic studies.

Sub-clustering based recommendation system for stroke patient: Identification of a specific drug class for a given patient.

Stroke is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Previous studies have explored machine learning techniques for early detection of stroke patients using content-based recommendation systems. However, these models often struggle with timely detection of medications, which can be critical for patient management and decision-making regarding the prescription of new drugs. In this study, we developed a content-based recommendation model using three machine learning algorithms: Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), Affinity Propagation (AP), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), to aid Healthcare Professionals (HCP) in quickly detecting medications based on the symptoms of a patient with stroke. Our model focused on three classes of drugs: antihypertensive, anticoagulant, and fibrate. Each machine learning algorithm was used to accomplish specific tasks, thereby reducing the partial search space, computational cost, and accurately detecting a primary drug class without loss of precision and accuracy. Our proposed model, called CRGANNC (Clustering Recommendation Gaussian Affinity Nearest Neighbors Classifier), effectively addresses the sparsity and scalability issues faced by content-based recommendation models. The CRGANNC model dynamically partition clusters into sub-clusters with variable numbers based on the group, and can diagnose healthy, sick, and at-risk patients, and recommend drugs to the HCP. In addition to our analysis, we developed a semi-artificial dataset with new features such as weakness, dizziness, headache, nausea, and vomiting, using a pipeline. This dataset serves as a valuable resource for researchers in the sensitive domain of stroke, providing a starting point for building and testing models when real data is often restricted. Our work not only contributes to the development of predictive models for stroke but also establishes a framework for creating similar datasets in other sensitive domains, accelerating research efforts and improving patient care. Our experiments were conducted on our dataset consisting of 9691 patient records, with 1206 records for stroke attacks and 8485 healthy patients. The CRGANNC model achieved an average precision of 0.98, recall of 0.95 and F1-score of 0.96 across all three drugs classes. Furthermore, our model demonstrated significant improvement in computational efficiency compared to existing content-based recommendation models, reducing the processing time by 25.80% . This results indicate the effectiveness of our model in accurately detecting medications for stroke patients based on their symptoms.

Effect of Fibrate Treatment on Circulating Adipokine Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: Fibrates are widely used in the treatment of dyslipidemia and associated metabolic abnormalities; however, their effects on adipokines are unclear. AIM OF THE STUDY: This meta-analysis of clinical trials aimed to evaluate the effect of fibrates on circulating adipokine levels. METHODS: Only randomized controlled trials investigating the impact/effect of fibrate treatment on circulating adipokine levels were included from searches in PubMed-Medline, SCOPUS, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. A random effects model and the generic inverse variance method were used for the meta-analysis. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the leave-one-out method. RESULTS: This meta-analysis of 22 clinical trials showed a significant reduction on/in leptin (WMD: -1.58 ng/mL, 95% CI: -2.96, -0.20, p = 0.02, I2 = 0%), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) (WMD: -13.86 ng/mL, 95% CI: -26.70, -1.03, p = 0.03, I2 = 99%), and visfatin (WMD: -1.52 ng/mL, 95% CI: -2.49, -0.56, p = 0.002, I2 = 0%) after fibrate therapy; no significant effect was observed on adiponectin (WMD: -0.69 µg/ml, 95% CI: -1.40, 0.02, p = 0.06, I2 = 83%) and resistin (WMD: -2.27 ng/mL, 95% CI: -7.11, 2.57, p = 0.36, I2 = 0%). The sensitivity analysis was robust only for visfatin, while the effect size was sensitive to one arm for leptin, four for adiponectin, and two for PAI-1. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that fibrate treatment significantly improves adipokine levels with a decrease in leptin, PAI-1, and visfatin, suggesting potential additional clinical therapeutic benefits through/of fibrate treatment on adipose tissue.

The effect of fibrates on lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular risk reduction: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: The effect of fibrate treatment on cardiovascular risk is inconsistent. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of fibrates on major adverse cardiovascular outcome (MACE) reduction. METHODS AND RESULTS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were searched up to February 2023 for randomized controlled trials comparing fibrate therapy against placebo and reporting cardiovascular outcomes and lipid profile changes. The primary outcome was the clinical outcomes of each trial that most closely corresponding to MACE, a composite of cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization. A pre-specified meta-regression analysis to examine the relationship between the changes in lipid levels after fibrate treatment and the risk of MACE was also performed. Twelve trials were selected for final analysis, with 25 781 patients and 2741 MACEs in the fibrate group and 27 450 patients and 3754 MACEs in the control group. Overall, fibrate therapy was associated with decreased risk of MACE [RR 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.94] with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 47%). In meta-regression analysis, each 1 mmol/L reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) after fibrate treatment reduced MACE (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.49-0.94, P = 0.01), while triglyceride level changes did not show a significant association (RR per 1mmol/L reduction 0.96, 95% CI 0.53-1.40, P = 0.86). A sensitivity analysis with the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or acute myocardial infarction produced similar results. CONCLUSION: Treatment with fibrates was associated with decreased risk of MACE. The reduction in MACE risk with fibrate therapy appears to be attributable to LDL-C reduction rather than a decrease in triglyceride levels.

A systematic review and meta-analysis including 12 trials and 53 231 patients were performed to investigate the effect of fibrates on lowering cardiovascular risk. Overall, fibrate therapy was associated with significantly decreased risk of cardiovascular events. In further analysis, the decrease in cardiovascular risk achieved with fibrate treatment was found to be largely attributable to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction.

Multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review was to understand the role of multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MFCS) as a cause of severe hypertriglyceridemia; to distinguish it from other causes of severe hypertriglyceridemia; and to provide a rational approach to treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: There have been advances in understanding the genetic underpinning of MFCS, and a better appreciation as to how to differentiate it from the much rarer familial chylomicronemia syndrome, in which there are substantial differences in the approach to their treatment. New approaches to triglyceride lowering will help reduce the risk of pancreatitis, the major complication of MFCS. SUMMARY: MCSF is a condition in which plasma triglyceride levels are severely elevated, usually to due exacerbation of common genetic forms of hypertriglyceridemia by secondary causes of hypertriglyceridemia and/or triglyceride-raising drugs. Triglyceride-induced pancreatitis can be prevented by markedly reducing triglyceride levels by treating secondary causes and/or eliminating of triglyceride-raising drugs, and by using triglyceride-lowering drugs, especially fibrates. MFCS also increases cardiovascular disease risk, for which lifestyle measures and drugs are required.

Impact of Dyslipidemia Medications on the Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy Among a Large US Cohort.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Dyslipidemia medications such as statins and fibrates may be associated with a reduction in diabetic retinopathy (DR) progression, but real-world data is lacking. This study evaluates cholesterol-lowering medications and their association with the prevalence of DR and advanced DR complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data was collected using codes from the International Classification of Diseases on TriNetX, a cross-sectional database of over 79 million Americans, between June and August 2022. Prevalence and prevalence odds ratios (POR) were calculated. RESULTS: Patients taking pitavastatin (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49, 0.84), fenofibrate (OR 0.83, CI 0.79, 0.87), or evolocumab (OR 0.80, CI 0.68, 0.95) had lower POR of proliferative DR compared to nonproliferative DR. Patients taking any cholesterol medication had a lower POR of vitreous hemorrhage. Patients taking fibrates also had lower POR of neovascular glaucoma. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study highlights positive associations between DR and dyslipidemia and medications that may have fewer worsening events in DR patients. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:626-633.].

Statin, Ezetimibe, or Fibrate Initiation and Subsequent Use for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases among Japanese Patients Aged ≥55 Years: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

The use of lipid-modifying agents (LMAs) other than statins has rarely been reported in real clinical settings. We aimed to compare the initiation and subsequent use of LMA classes for prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Using the national claims database, this retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients aged ≥55 years who initiated to use statins, ezetimibe, or fibrates between Fiscal Years (FYs) 2014 and 2017 as the first pharmacotherapy for dyslipidemia in Japan. A permissible gap for defining persistence was set as the median days of supply of a class to an individual. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for rates. Cohorts for primary prevention without/with risk and secondary prevention comprised 1307438, 908378, and 503059 initiators for statins; 44116, 34206, and 11373 for ezetimibe; and 124511, 96380, and 27751 for fibrates. The persistence rates declined shortly after the therapy initiation regardless of the classes, which was approximately 50% at 1 year for any class for primary prevention without risk. A notable sex difference in terms of persistence rates was observed only for statins of secondary prevention. The restarting rates were similar between prevention settings: approximately 50-60% for statins and 30-40% for ezetimibe and fibrates 1 year after first discontinuation. For ezetimibe and fibrates, approximately 10% of initiators were added or switched to statins within 1 year of initiation. Collectively, any class tended to be discontinued early and some restarted; however, there were some unique classes. The findings are useful for improvement of dyslipidemia therapy.

Lipid-lowering therapies for cardiovascular disease prevention and management in primary care: PEER umbrella systematic review of systematic reviews.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefits and harms of lipid-lowering therapies used to prevent or manage cardiovascular disease including bile acid sequestrants (BAS), ezetimibe, fibrates, niacin, omega-3 supplements, proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, and statins. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and a grey literature search. STUDY SELECTION: Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials published between January 2017 and March 2022 looking at statins, ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors, fibrates, BAS, niacin, and omega-3 supplements for preventing cardiovascular outcomes were selected. Outcomes of interest included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and adverse events. SYNTHESIS: A total of 76 systematic reviews were included. Four randomized controlled trials were also included for BAS because no efficacy systematic review was identified. Statins significantly reduced MACE (6 systematic reviews; median risk ratio [RR]=0.74; interquartile range [IQR]=0.71 to 0.76), cardiovascular mortality (7 systematic reviews; median RR=0.85, IQR=0.83 to 0.86), and all-cause mortality (8 systematic reviews; median RR=0.91, IQR=0.88 to 0.92). Major adverse cardiovascular events were also significantly reduced by ezetimibe (3 systematic reviews; median RR=0.93, IQR=0.93 to 0.94), PCSK9 inhibitors (14 systematic reviews; median RR=0.84, IQR=0.83 to 0.87), and fibrates (2 systematic reviews; mean RR=0.86), but these interventions had no effect on cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. Fibrates had no effect on any cardiovascular outcomes when added to a statin. Omega-3 combination supplements had no effect on MACE or all-cause mortality but significantly reduced cardiovascular mortality (5 systematic reviews; median RR=0.93, IQR=0.93 to 0.94). Eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester alone significantly reduced MACE (1 systematic review, RR=0.78) and cardiovascular mortality (2 systematic reviews; RRs of 0.82 and 0.82). In primary cardiovascular prevention, only statins showed consistent benefits on MACE (6 systematic reviews; median RR=0.75, IQR=0.73 to 0.78), cardiovascularall-cause mortality (7 systematic reviews, median RR=0.83, IQR=0.81 to 0.90), and all-cause mortality (8 systematic reviews; median RR=0.91, IQR=0.87 to 0.91). CONCLUSION: Statins have the most consistent evidence for the prevention of cardiovascular complications with a relative risk reduction of about 25% for MACE and 10% to 15% for mortality. The addition of ezetimibe, a PCSK9 inhibitor, or eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester to a statin provides additional MACE risk reduction but has no effect on all-cause mortality.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes: Lipid goal attainment in a large German-Austrian diabetes registry.

AIM: To assess the implementation of the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guideline recommendations for lipid-lowering therapies among more than 30 000 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a German and Austrian registry from 2020 to 2022. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Registry data from 2020 and 2021 of 32 170 adult patients (8314 patients with T1D and 23 856 with T2D) were stratified according to the 2019 ESC/EAS risk categories, and guideline-based low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) goal attainment was analysed. RESULTS: In patients with T1D (median age 38.35 [20.51-57.13] years), overall statin use was 19.3%, ezetimibe use was 2.2% and the use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors or fibrates was less than 1%. In patients with T2D (median age 68.76 [58.86-78.39] years), 45.7% received statins, 3.4% received ezetimibe, and fibrates and PCSK9 inhibitors were used by 1% and 0.1%, respectively. Among patients with T1D, 6.16% reached their risk-based recommended LDL-C goal of less than 55 mg/dL (very high risk), 10.97% of less than 70 mg/dL (high risk), and 69.50% of less than 100 mg/dL (moderate risk), respectively. In patients with T2D, 11.81% reached their risk-based goal of LDL-C less than 55 mg/dL, 16.25% of less than 70 mg/dL, and 51.33% of less than 100 mg/dL. Non-HDL-C goals were reached more often, with 15.3%, 25.52% and 91.61% in patients with T1D and 18.56%, 17.96% and 82.30% in patients with T2D for very high, high and moderate risk, respectively. CONCLUSION: Approximately 2 years after publication of the guidelines, LDL-C and non-HDL-C goal attainment was rarely achieved in patients with T1D and T2D with a high or very high cardiovascular risk.

Differential effects on renal function and glucose metabolism of renal dependent bezafibrate and non-renal dependent pemafibrate in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.

OBJECTIVE: Among fibrates as triglyceride-lowering agents, bezafibrate and fenofibrate are predominantly renally excreted, while pemafibrate is mainly hepatically metabolized and biliary excreted. To elucidate possible different properties among fibrates, this retrospective observational study examined the changes in clinical laboratory parameters, including indices of renal function and glucose metabolism, in cases of switching from bezafibrate to pemafibrate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 93 patients with hypertriglyceridemia, the average values of laboratory parameters including serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), plasma glucose, and hemoglobin A1c on respective two occasions before and after switching from bezafibrate to pemafibrate were evaluated. RESULTS: Triglycerides, low-density and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, creatine kinase, and uric acid did not change before and after switching from bezafibrate to pemafibrate. Serum creatinine significantly decreased and eGFR significantly increased after switching from bezafibrate to pemafibrate (p < 0.001, respectively). Plasma glucose tended to increase (p = 0.070) and hemoglobin A1c significantly increased (p < 0.001) after switching to pemafibrate. The degrees of changes in creatinine, eGFR, glucose, and hemoglobin A1c before and after drug switching were not affected by the presence or absence of coexisting disease, and with or without drug treatment including statin and renin-angiotensin system inhibitor. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that switching from bezafibrate to pemafibrate produces a significant decrease in serum creatinine and increases in eGFR and hemoglobin A1c in patients with hypertriglyceridemia, suggesting that the effects on renal function and glucose metabolism differ among fibrates.

Very severe hypertriglyceridemia complicating pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment: a call for management guidelines.

OBJECTIVES: Severe and very severe hypertriglyceridemia although rare within the pediatric population occur more often among oncology patients, secondary to chemotherapeutic agents. Currently there exists minimal literature to guide management of severe hypertriglyceridemia among pediatric patients. Very-low-fat dietary restriction should be considered over nil per os (NPO) for initial management of severe hypertriglyceridemia in stable pediatric patients. Pediatricians caring for oncology patients must consider chylomicronemia as a potential etiology for presenting symptoms. Pediatric severe hypertriglyceridemia management guidelines are needed as pediatricians must currently rely on anecdotal experiences for management decisions. CASE PRESENTATION: Three children receiving treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia required hospitalization for very severe hypertriglyceridemia. Management varied among the cases but included: NPO or very-low-fat diet, insulin, intravenous fluids, fibrates, and omega-3 fatty acids. CONCLUSIONS: These cases suggest that pediatric severe hypertriglyceridemia management, in the absence of pancreatitis should allow a very-low-fat diet initially rather than NPO followed by pharmacologic therapies.

Fibrates, Hypertriglyceridemia, and CVD Risk: Where Do We Stand After the PROMINENT Trial for Triglyceride Lowering?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate recent clinical trials focusing on patients with hypertriglyceridemia. RECENT FINDINGS: Randomized clinical trials have recently been undertaken in hypertriglyceridemic patients to determine whether effective reductions in triglycerides would improve cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes. However, the fibric acid derivative, pemafibrate, failed to reduce cardiovascular events despite significant reductions (~ 25-35%) in triglyceride levels and despite background statin therapy. In contrast, icosapent ethyl, a highly purified omega-3 fatty acid was previously shown to reduce CVD events in hypertriglyceridemic patients, despite more modest reductions (~ 20%) in triglyceride levels in statin treated patients. The divergent results obtained in patients with hypertriglyceridemia (HTG), a group at particularly high risk of CVD, especially when coupled with other risk factors, indicates that triglyceride lowering in of itself is insufficient to offset CVD risk. Rather, the effectiveness of therapy in this high-risk cohort may be the result of the suppression of the inherent atherogenic properties associated with HTG.

Fibrates Affect Levels of Phosphorylated p38 in Intestinal Cells in a Differentiation-Dependent Manner.

Fibrates are widely used hypolipidaemic agents that act as ligands of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα). p38 is a protein kinase that is mainly activated by environmental and genotoxic stress. We investigated the effect of the PPARα activators fenofibrate and WY-14643 and the PPARα inhibitor GW6471 on the levels of activated p38 (p-p38) in the colorectal cancer cell lines HT-29 and Caco2 in relation to their differentiation status. Fibrates increased p-p38 in undifferentiated HT-29 cells, whereas in other cases p-p38 expression was decreased. HT-29 cells showed p-p38 predominantly in the cytoplasm, whereas Caco2 cells showed higher nuclear positivity. The effect of fibrates may depend on the differentiation status of the cell, as differentiated HT-29 and undifferentiated Caco2 cells share similar characteristics in terms of villin, CYP2J2, and soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) expression. In human colorectal carcinoma, higher levels of p-p38 were detected in the cytoplasm, whereas in normal colonic surface epithelium, p-p38 showed nuclear positivity. The decrease in p-p38 positivity was associated with a decrease in sEH, consistent with in vitro results. In conclusion, fibrates affect the level of p-p38, but its exact role in the process of carcinogenesis remains unclear and further research is needed in this area.

Adverse drug reactions of non-statin antihyperlipidaemic drugs in China from 1989 to 2019: a national database analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to understand the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for non-statin antihyperlipidaemic drugs included in the China Anti-hyperlipidemic Drug Database. DESIGN: An approach of Chinese national database analysis was employed to screen clinical trials involving non-statin antihyperlipidaemic drugs from 1989 to 2019. SETTING: The database was provided by the China National Medical Products Administration Information Centre. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 117 clinical studies with 8800 patients were selected from 2650 clinical trials of the Anti-hyperlipidemic Drug Database. INTERVENTIONS: The non-statin antihyperlipidaemic drugs were divided into three groups: (1) fibrates (fenofibrate, gemfibrozil, bezafibrate, etofylline clofibrate); (2) nicotinic acid and derivatives (niacin, acipimox) and (3) others (probucol, cholestyramine). RESULTS: The results of this study show that first, gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common reactions (6.975%), which account for approximately 50% of the reported cases with ADRs. Second, cholestyramine (16.418%) and gemfibrozil (13.158%) were the most common gastrointestinal side effect-causing non-statin antihyperlipidaemic drugs, which account for one-third of the population. Third, niacin (7.879%) and gemfibrozil (5.000%) were the most likely cause of liver disease symptoms. Finally, niacin (10.909%) and acipimox (18.847%) were the major non-statin antihyperlipidaemic drugs with skin symptoms. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common ADRs of fibrates, probucol and cholestyramine in the Chinese population. For nicotinic acid and derivatives, the ADRs of skin symptoms were the most common in China.

Benefits and harms of fibrate therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the benefits and harms of fibrate therapy, alone or in combination with statins, in adult patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in six databases, from inception to January 27, 2022. Clinical trials that compared fibrate therapy with other lipid-lowering interventions or placebo were included. Outcomes of interest comprised cardiovascular (CV) events, complications of T2D, metabolic profile, and adverse events. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR), alongside 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: A total of 25 studies were included, six comparing fibrates against statins, 11 against placebo, and eight evaluating the combination of fibrates with statins. Overall risk of bias was rated as moderate, and most outcomes rendered low confidence per GRADE approach. Fibrates showed reduction of serum triglycerides (TGs) (MD -17.81, CI -33.92 to -1.69) and a marginal increase of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) (MD: 1.60, CI 0.29 to 2.90) in adults with T2D, but no differences were found in CV events when compared to statin therapy (RR 0.99, CI 0.76 to 1.09). When used in combination with statins, no major differences were exhibited regarding lipid profile and CV outcomes. Adverse events were comparable between fibrate and statin monotherapies (e.g., RR of 1.03 for rhabdomyolysis, and 0.90 for gastrointestinal events). CONCLUSIONS: Fibrate therapy in patients with T2D results in a marginal improvement of TGs and HDL-c but without reducing the risk of CV events and mortality. Their use should be reserved for very specific scenarios after a deliberative dialogue between patients and clinicians regarding their benefits and harms.