Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
Arch Osteoporos ; 15(1): 37, 2020 03 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32124066

ABSTRACT

Changes in health-related quality of life (QoL) due to hip, humeral, ankle, spine, and distal forearm fracture were measured in Russian adults age 50 years or more over the first 18 months after fracture. The accumulated mean QoL loss after hip fracture was 0.5 and significantly greater than after fracture of the distal forearm (0.13), spine (0.21), proximal humerus (0.26), and ankle (0.27). INTRODUCTION: Data on QoL following osteoporotic fractures in Russia are scarce. The present study evaluated the impact of hip, vertebral, proximal humerus, distal forearm, and ankle fracture up to 18 months after fracture from the Russian arm of the International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study. METHODS: Individuals age ≥ 50 years with low-energy-induced humeral, hip, clinical vertebral, ankle, or distal forearm fracture were enrolled. After a recall of pre-fracture status, HRQoL was prospectively collected over 18 months of follow-up using EQ-5D-3L. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify determinants of QALYs loss. RESULTS: At 2 weeks, patients with hip fracture (n = 223) reported the lowest mean health state utility value (HSUV) compared with other fracture sites. Thereafter, utility values increased but remained significantly lower than before fracture. For spine (n = 183), humerus (n = 166), and ankle fractures (n = 214), there was a similar pattern of disutility with a nadir within 2 weeks and a progressive recovery thereafter. The accumulated mean QoL loss after hip fracture was 0.5 and significantly greater than after fracture of the distal forearm (0.13), spine (0.21), proximal humerus (0.26), and ankle (0.27). Substantial impairment in self-care and usual activities immediately after fracture were important predictors of recovery across at all fracture sites. CONCLUSIONS: Fractures of the hip, vertebral, distal forearm, ankle, and proximal humerus incur substantial loss of QoL in Russia. The utility values derived from this study can be used in future economic evaluations.


Subject(s)
Osteoporotic Fractures/economics , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ankle Injuries/economics , Ankle Injuries/psychology , Cost of Illness , Female , Forearm Injuries/economics , Forearm Injuries/psychology , Hip Fractures/economics , Hip Fractures/psychology , Humans , Humeral Fractures/economics , Humeral Fractures/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoporotic Fractures/psychology , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Russia/epidemiology , Spinal Fractures/economics , Spinal Fractures/psychology
2.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 56(2)2020 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32075219

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives: There are various methods in the management of forearm fractures in children. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing using Titanium Elastic Nail (TEN) is nowadays employed in diaphysis fractures of children, with clear benefits over other treatment options. However, in the case of TEN versus other treatment methods of forearm fractures in children, cost is an important issue. This report will focus on the cost assessment of using TEN versus other therapeutic means in the treatment of forearm fractures in children. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective longitudinal study of 173 consecutive patients with forearm fractures treated in a single institution during 2017. We calculated the cost for each patient by summing up direct costs plus indirect costs, calculated at an aggregate level. Hospital income data were extracted from the Diagnosis Related Groups database. Results: A total of 173 patients with forearm fractures were treated, 44 using TEN, 86 using K-wire, and 46 using closed reduction and cast. There were 66 radius fractures, 1 ulna fracture, and 106 that were both radius and ulna fractures. Mean treatment cost were $632.76 for TEN, $499.50 for K-wire, and $451.30 for closed reduction and cast. Costs for TEN were higher than for K-wire insertion (p = 0.00) and higher than closed reduction and cast ($182.42; p = 0.00). Reimbursement per patient was higher with TEN versus K-wire patients; $497.88 vs. $364.64 /patient (p = 0.00), and higher than for patients treated with closed reduction and cast (p = 0.00). Conclusions: The treatment of upper extremity fractures using TEN was more expensive than the other methods. In Romania, because the reimbursement for TEN is higher as well, there are no differences in the financial burden when treating forearm fractures with TEN versus K-wire. Non-surgical treatment has the lowest cost but also the lowest reimbursement.


Subject(s)
Forearm Injuries/economics , Forearm Injuries/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/economics , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Diagnosis-Related Groups/statistics & numerical data , Female , Forearm/physiology , Forearm/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Retrospective Studies , Romania , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
Pain Med ; 20(8): 1559-1569, 2019 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30848817

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: First, to determine the number of accident-related complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) cases from 2008 to 2015 and to identify factors associated with an increased risk for developing CRPS. Second, to analyze the duration of work incapacity and direct health care costs over follow-up periods of two and five years, respectively. DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis. SETTING: Database from the Statistical Service for the Swiss National Accident Insurances covering all accidents insured under the compulsory Swiss Accident Insurance Law. SUBJECTS: Subjects were registered after an accident between 2008 and 2015. METHODS: Cases were retrospectively retrieved from the Statistical Service for the Swiss National Accident Insurances. Cases were identified using the appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes. RESULTS: CRPS accounted for 0.15% of all accident cases. Age, female gender (odds ratio [OR] = 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.47-1.60), and fracture of the forearm (OR = 38, 95% CI = 35-42) were related to an increased risk of developing CRPS. Over five years, one CRPS case accumulated average insurance costs of $86,900 USD and treatment costs of $23,300 USD. Insurance costs were 19 times and treatment costs 13 times the average costs of accidents without CPRS. Within the first two years after the accident, the number of days lost at work was 20 times higher in patients with CRPS (330 ± 7 days) than in patients without CRPS (16.1 ± 0.1 days). Two-thirds of all CRPS cases developed long-term work incapacity of more than 90 days. CONCLUSION: CRPS is a relatively rare condition but is associated with high direct health care costs and work incapacity.


Subject(s)
Accidents , Complex Regional Pain Syndromes/economics , Cost of Illness , Employment , Health Care Costs , Health Expenditures , Return to Work , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arm Injuries/economics , Arm Injuries/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Complex Regional Pain Syndromes/epidemiology , Complex Regional Pain Syndromes/physiopathology , Female , Forearm Injuries/economics , Forearm Injuries/epidemiology , Fractures, Bone/economics , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Insurance, Accident , Joint Dislocations/economics , Joint Dislocations/epidemiology , Leg Injuries/economics , Leg Injuries/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Switzerland/epidemiology , Work Capacity Evaluation , Young Adult
4.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 27(19): e887-e892, 2019 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30720568

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Charges, procedural efficiency, return to activity, and complications after closed treatment of fractures performed in an operating room (OR) versus closed reduction in a dedicated fracture reduction room (FRR) were compared. METHODS: Patients with closed fractures of the forearm who underwent closed reduction in the year before (OR), and after implementation of the FRR, were retrospectively reviewed. Charges, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, sex, age, length of follow-up, prior reduction, fracture location/displacement, time from injury to procedure, procedural time, time to return to activity, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria in the FRR group (13 men, 5 women), and 22 in the OR group (18 men, 4 women). No notable differences in age, sex, follow-up, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, fracture location/displacement, incidence of prior reduction, or time to return to activity were observed. Two (9.5%) complications occurred in the FRR group versus 7 (32%) in the OR group, P > 0.05. No anesthesia complications were present. Patients treated in the FRR incurred charges of $5,299 ± $1,289 versus $10,455 ± $2,290 in the OR, P < 0.001. Total time of visit in the FRR was ∼30% less than the OR, P < 0.001. No notable delay in treatment was observed. DISCUSSION: In the era of finite resources and value-based care, implementation of a FRR resulted in safe, cost-effective, and increased procedural efficiency.


Subject(s)
Closed Fracture Reduction/economics , Forearm Injuries/surgery , Hospital Units/economics , Radius Fractures/surgery , Ulna Fractures/surgery , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Closed Fracture Reduction/adverse effects , Closed Fracture Reduction/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Efficiency, Organizational , Female , Forearm Injuries/economics , Hospital Units/standards , Humans , Male , Operating Rooms/economics , Operating Rooms/standards , Radius Fractures/economics , Return to Sport , Time Factors , Ulna Fractures/economics
5.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 34(7): 451-456, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28632577

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the outcome differences between board-certified orthopedists and pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians conducting forearm fracture reductions. METHODS: We performed an analysis of patients between 1 and 14 years of age who presented to the emergency department (ED) with a forearm fracture requiring reduction. Data collected included reducing provider (PEM or orthopedist) and prereduction, postreduction, and follow-up fracture angles and displacements of both radius and ulna. We collected costs of care, both in the ED and at follow-up, as well as length-of-stay data. χ Tests and Fisher exact test compared associations between categorical variables; 2-sample t tests compared the PEM and orthopedic groups. Regression models were used to control for injury severity confounders. RESULTS: Of the 222 fractures, orthopedists reduced 135, and PEM doctors reduced 87. Based on fracture angle and displacement, the orthopedic group tended to have slightly more complicated cases. After adjusting for age and time to follow-up, fractures reduced by orthopedists were less likely to require remanipulation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.30; P = 0.020). The PEM group had a significantly lower length of stay (59.4 minutes shorter; P < 0.001) and a small overall saving in charges ($273.90; P = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Orthopedists performed better in maintaining fracture reductions compared with PEM physicians but lengthened the ED stay for our patients. There was no significant difference in cost.


Subject(s)
Forearm Injuries/therapy , Fracture Fixation/statistics & numerical data , Orthopedic Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Forearm Injuries/economics , Fracture Fixation/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 36(8): 816-820, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26057068

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We hypothesize that after successful closed reduction of pediatric greenstick fractures of the forearm, there is a low rate of lost reduction requiring intervention. By reducing the frequency of clinical and radiographic follow-up, we can reduce costs and radiation exposure. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients aged 2 to 16 years treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization for greenstick fractures of the forearm at our institution between 2003 and 2013. The primary endpoint was a healed fracture with acceptable alignment at the final radiographic evaluation. Time-derived activity-based costing was used for cost analysis. We estimated radiation exposure in consultation with our hospital's radiation safety office. RESULTS: One hundred and nine patients with an average age of 6.9 years (range, 2 to 15 y) met the inclusion criteria. The initial maximal fracture angulation of the affected radius and/or ulna averaged 19.3 (SD=±8.7) degrees (range, 2 to 55 degrees). Patients were followed for an average of 60 days (range, 19 to 635 d). On average, patients received 3.6 follow-up clinical visits and 3.5 sets of radiographs following immediate emergency department care. Ninety-four percent of patients met criteria for acceptable radiographic alignment. Only 1 patient (0.9%; 95% confidence interval, 0.2%-5.0%) underwent rereduction, as determined by the treating physician. If clinical follow-up were limited to 2 visits and 3 sets of radiographs total, there would be a 14.3% reduction in total cost of fracture care and a 41% reduction in radiation exposure. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study suggests that pediatric greenstick fractures of the forearm rarely require intervention after initial closed reduction. We propose that 2 clinical follow-up visits and 3 sets of radiographs would reduce overall care costs and radiation exposure without compromising clinical results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-economic and decision analyses.


Subject(s)
Casts, Surgical , Forearm Injuries/therapy , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiography , Radius Fractures/therapy , Ulna Fractures/therapy , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Forearm Injuries/diagnosis , Forearm Injuries/economics , Humans , Male , Radius Fractures/diagnosis , Radius Fractures/economics , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Ulna Fractures/diagnosis , Ulna Fractures/economics
7.
Arch Osteoporos ; 8: 136, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24113837

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: This report describes the epidemiology, burden, and treatment of osteoporosis in the 27 countries of the European Union (EU27). INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is characterized by reduced bone mass and disruption of bone architecture, resulting in increased risk of fragility fractures which represent the main clinical consequence of the disease. Fragility fractures are associated with substantial pain and suffering, disability and even death for affected patients and substantial costs to society. The aim of this report was to characterize the burden of osteoporosis in the EU27 in 2010 and beyond. METHODS: The literature on fracture incidence and costs of fractures in the EU27 was reviewed and incorporated into a model estimating the clinical and economic burden of osteoporotic fractures in 2010. RESULTS: Twenty-two million women and 5.5 million men were estimated to have osteoporosis; and 3.5 million new fragility fractures were sustained, comprising 610,000 hip fractures, 520,000 vertebral fractures, 560,000 forearm fractures and 1,800,000 other fractures (i.e. fractures of the pelvis, rib, humerus, tibia, fibula, clavicle, scapula, sternum and other femoral fractures). The economic burden of incident and prior fragility fractures was estimated at 37 billion. Incident fractures represented 66 % of this cost, long-term fracture care 29 % and pharmacological prevention 5 %. Previous and incident fractures also accounted for 1,180,000 quality-adjusted life years lost during 2010. The costs are expected to increase by 25 % in 2025. The majority of individuals who have sustained an osteoporosis-related fracture or who are at high risk of fracture are untreated and the number of patients on treatment is declining. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of the high social and economic cost of osteoporosis, a substantial treatment gap and projected increase of the economic burden driven by the aging populations, the use of pharmacological interventions to prevent fractures has decreased in recent years, suggesting that a change in healthcare policy is warranted.


Subject(s)
Osteoporosis/therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Absorptiometry, Photon/economics , Absorptiometry, Photon/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Density/physiology , Bone Density Conservation Agents/economics , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Cost of Illness , Europe/epidemiology , European Union , Female , Forearm Injuries/economics , Forearm Injuries/epidemiology , Forearm Injuries/therapy , Forecasting , Guideline Adherence , Hip Fractures/economics , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Hip Fractures/therapy , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/economics , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/economics , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prevalence , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Risk Assessment , Spinal Fractures/economics , Spinal Fractures/epidemiology , Spinal Fractures/therapy
8.
Arch Osteoporos ; 8: 137, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24113838

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: This report describes epidemiology, burden, and treatment of osteoporosis in each of the 27 countries of the European Union (EU27). INTRODUCTION: In 2010, 22 million women and 5.5 million men were estimated to have osteoporosis in the EU; and 3.5 million new fragility fractures were sustained, comprising 620,000 hip fractures, 520,000 vertebral fractures, 560,000 forearm fractures and 1,800,000 other fractures. The economic burden of incident and prior fragility fractures was estimated at € 37 billion. Previous and incident fractures also accounted for 1,180,000 quality-adjusted life years lost during 2010. The costs are expected to increase by 25 % in 2025. The majority of individuals who have sustained an osteoporosis-related fracture or who are at high risk of fracture are untreated and the number of patients on treatment is declining. The aim of this report was to characterize the burden of osteoporosis in each of the EU27 countries in 2010 and beyond. METHODS: The data on fracture incidence and costs of fractures in the EU27 were taken from a concurrent publication in this journal (Osteoporosis in the European Union: Medical Management, Epidemiology and Economic Burden) and country specific information extracted. RESULTS: The clinical and economic burden of osteoporotic fractures in 2010 is given for each of the 27 countries of the EU. The costs are expected to increase on average by 25 % in 2025. The majority of individuals who have sustained an osteoporosis-related fracture or who are at high risk of fracture are untreated and the number of patients on treatment is declining. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of the high cost of osteoporosis, a substantial treatment gap and projected increase of the economic burden driven by aging populations, the use of pharmacological prevention of osteoporosis has decreased in recent years, suggesting that a change in healthcare policy concerning the disease is warranted.


Subject(s)
Osteoporosis/therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Density Conservation Agents/economics , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Cost of Illness , Europe/epidemiology , European Union , Female , Forearm Injuries/economics , Forearm Injuries/epidemiology , Forearm Injuries/therapy , Hip Fractures/economics , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Hip Fractures/therapy , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/economics , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/economics , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Sex Distribution , Spinal Fractures/economics , Spinal Fractures/epidemiology , Spinal Fractures/therapy
9.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 25 Suppl 1: S13-4, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24046040

ABSTRACT

Osteoporosis can significantly impact on the risk of developing a fracture. Thus, fragility fractures represent a challenge for health professionals and decision makers of the twenty-first century. The aim of this work is to review the literature concerning osteoporotic fractures in Italy in terms of incidence, rate of hospitalization, relative risk of a new fragility fracture, and costs for the national health system. It was estimated that the costs of treating proximal femur fragility fractures in 2002 summed up to 1 billion Euros. The number of fragility fractures in Italy was calculated as follows: 91.494 hip fractures, 61.009 clinical vertebral fractures, 57.401 humeral fragility fractures, and 94.045 forearm/wrist fragility fractures. The incidence of fragility fractures in Italy is very high, and osteoporosis is the leading cause of morbidity in the Italian population.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aging , Female , Forearm Injuries/economics , Forearm Injuries/epidemiology , Health Care Costs , Hip Fractures/economics , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Humeral Fractures/economics , Humeral Fractures/epidemiology , Incidence , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Risk , Spinal Fractures/economics , Spinal Fractures/epidemiology
10.
Med Sport Sci ; 58: 142-57, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22824844

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this report is to review the available literature to provide an epidemiological overview of skateboarding injuries, as well as to suggest possible areas for future research. A literature search was performed with the databases of PubMed, Sport Discus, Google and Google Scholar using the search terms 'skateboard', 'skateboarding', 'injury' and 'injuries', with all articles published in refereed journals in the English language being considered. An ancestry approach was also used. Articles from non-juried journals were also infrequently included to provide anecdotal information on the sport. Comparison of study results was compromised by the diversity of different study populations and variability of injury definitions across studies. The majority of injuries affect young males although conflicting arguments arise over the issues of age and experience in relation to injury severity. Most injuries are acutely suffered, and the most commonly affected body part was the wrist and forearm, with lower leg and ankle injuries also common. The incidence was relatively high but reports on severity differed. Clear conclusions could not be drawn on environmental location and risk factors. Most injuries tend to occur from a loss of balance leading to a fall, in more recent times due to a failed trick. Research on injury prevention is not conclusive although protective equipment and skatepark use are recommended. Further research using more rigorous study designs is required to gain a clearer picture of the incidence and determinants of injury, and to identify risk factors and viable injury countermeasures.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Skating/injuries , Ankle Injuries/economics , Ankle Injuries/epidemiology , Ankle Injuries/prevention & control , Athletic Injuries/economics , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Female , Forearm Injuries/economics , Forearm Injuries/epidemiology , Forearm Injuries/prevention & control , Humans , Incidence , Injury Severity Score , Leg Injuries/economics , Leg Injuries/epidemiology , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Male , Risk Factors , Wrist Injuries/economics , Wrist Injuries/epidemiology , Wrist Injuries/prevention & control
11.
Gesundheitswesen ; 74(10): e90-8, 2012 Oct.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22422076

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We examined the financial burden of osteoporosis in Austria. METHODS: We took both direct and indirect costs into consideration. Direct costs encompass medical costs such as expenses for pharmaceuticals, inpatient and outpatient medical care costs, as well as other medical services (e.g., occupational therapies). Non-medical direct costs include transportation costs and medical devices (e.g., wheel chairs or crutches). Indirect costs refer to costs of productivity losses due to absence of work. Moreover, we included costs for early retirement and opportunity costs of informal care provided by family members. While there exist similar studies for other countries, this is the first comprehensive study for Austria. For our analysis, we combined data of official statistics, expert estimates as well as unique patient surveys that are currently conducted in the course of an international osteoporotic fracture study in Austria. RESULTS: Our estimation of the total annual costs in the year 2008 imposed by osteoporosis in Austria is 707.4 million €. The largest fraction of this amount is incurred by acute hospital treatment. Another significant figure, accounting for 29% of total costs, is the opportunity cost of informal care. CONCLUSIONS: The financial burden of osteoporosis in Austria is substantial. Economic evaluations of preventive and therapeutic interventions for the specific context of Austria are needed to inform health policy decision makers.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , National Health Programs/economics , Osteoporotic Fractures/economics , Patient Care/economics , Ambulatory Care/economics , Austria , Caregivers/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Female , Forearm Injuries/economics , Forearm Injuries/prevention & control , Health Policy/economics , Hip Fractures/economics , Hip Fractures/prevention & control , Home Care Services/economics , Home Nursing/economics , Humans , Humeral Fractures/economics , Humeral Fractures/prevention & control , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Pensions/statistics & numerical data , Rib Fractures/economics , Rib Fractures/prevention & control , Spinal Fractures/economics , Spinal Fractures/prevention & control
12.
BMC Pediatr ; 8: 28, 2008 Jul 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18606018

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health-care costs for hand and forearm injuries in young children are poorly documented. We examined costs in 533 children injured years 1996-2003. METHODS: Health-care costs and costs for lost productivity were retrospectively calculated in children from three catchment areas in Sweden. Seven case categories corresponding to alternative prevention strategies were constructed. RESULTS: Over time, diminishing number of ward days reduced the health-care cost per case. Among children, the cost of lost productivity due to parental leave was 14 percent of total cost. Fingertip injuries had low median costs but high total costs due to their frequency. Complex injuries by machine or rifle had high costs per case, and despite a low number of cases, total cost was high. Type of injury, surgery and physiotherapy sessions were associated with variations in health-care cost. Low age and ethnic background had a significant effect on number of ward days. CONCLUSION: The costs per hand injury for children were lower compared to adults due to both lower health-care costs and to the fact that parents had comparatively short periods of absence from work. Frequent simple fingertip injuries and rare complex injuries induce high costs for society. Such costs should be related to costs for prevention of these injuries.


Subject(s)
Forearm Injuries/economics , Hand Injuries/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost of Illness , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Finger Injuries/economics , Finger Injuries/epidemiology , Finger Injuries/therapy , Forearm Injuries/epidemiology , Forearm Injuries/therapy , Hand Injuries/epidemiology , Hand Injuries/therapy , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Sweden/epidemiology
13.
Bone ; 40(6): 1602-9, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17433804

ABSTRACT

In osteoporosis, the bone mass is decreased, thereby increasing the risk of fractures. Common osteoporotic fractures include those at the hip, the spine and the forearm. Fractures are a burden to society; in terms of costs, morbidity and mortality. The main objective of this study was to estimate the burden of osteoporosis in Sweden. The study used a prevalence-based bottom-up approach to estimate the total annual burden of osteoporosis in Sweden. The burden was assessed from a societal perspective including medical care costs, non-medical care costs, informal care and indirect costs. Moreover, the value of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) lost because of fractures was included in the total burden estimations. The total annual fracture cost was estimated at MSEK 5639, which is about 3.2% of the total health care costs in Sweden. Community care was the most important cost category accounting for 66% of the total annual cost followed by medical care costs (31%), informal care (2%) and indirect costs (1%). By combining the annual value of QALYs lost (MSEK 10354) and the annual fracture costs, the total annual societal burden of osteoporosis in Sweden was estimated at MSEK 15183. Assuming no changes in the age-differentiated fracture risk, the annual burden of osteoporosis was projected to increase to MSEK 26301 in the year 2050. The present study shows the societal burden of osteoporosis in Sweden to be higher than previously perceived. This burden is substantial and must be acknowledged as an important health problem. Osteoporosis-related fractures do not only lead to high medical care costs but also to high community care costs.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone/economics , Osteoporosis/economics , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cost of Illness , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Forearm Injuries/economics , Forearm Injuries/etiology , Fractures, Bone/etiology , Health Care Costs , Hip Fractures/economics , Hip Fractures/etiology , Hospital Costs , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , Osteoporosis/complications , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Spinal Fractures/economics , Spinal Fractures/etiology , Sweden
14.
J Hand Surg Am ; 31(3): 468-73, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16516744

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the demographic patterns, clinical morbidity, and treatment costs associated with domestic animal bites to the hand. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 111 patients who suffered either a dog or cat bite to the hand. Demographic data were collected for both the patient and the animal involved. RESULTS: The patient population had suffered 71 dog bites and 40 cat bites. Two scenarios were identified that increased the likelihood of a bite: (1) attempting to separate fighting animals and (2) attempting to aid an injured animal. More than half of the victims (61 of 111) were bitten by an animal with which they were familiar. Bite injuries ranged from relatively minor wounds to major injuries that included open fractures, persistent deep infection including osteomyelitis, nerve laceration, tendon laceration, or tissue loss. Approximately two thirds of patients required hospital admission at least for intravenous antibiotics. Approximately one third of animal bite victims required at least 1 surgical procedure. Thirteen patients required long-term intravenous antibiotics and/or multiple surgeries and incurred medical expenses in excess of dollar 77,000. CONCLUSIONS: Domestic animal bites to the hand are common injuries that can produce considerable morbidity. Stray animals did not account for the majority of incidents. Bite prevention strategies should focus on careful handling of animals that are fighting or injured. Animal bite wounds often require intravenous antibiotics and hospitalization and the cost of care for deep infections can be enormous. Our patient population was selected from a small geographic area over a relatively short collection period, suggesting that domestic animal bite injuries may represent a major public health issue. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, Level IV.


Subject(s)
Bites and Stings/economics , Bites and Stings/therapy , Hand Injuries/economics , Hand Injuries/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bites and Stings/epidemiology , Cats , Child , Debridement/economics , Debridement/statistics & numerical data , Dogs , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Forearm Injuries/economics , Forearm Injuries/epidemiology , Forearm Injuries/therapy , Hand Injuries/epidemiology , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteomyelitis/economics , Osteomyelitis/epidemiology , Osteomyelitis/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Severity Indices , United States/epidemiology
15.
Osteoporos Int ; 17(2): 252-8, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16193229

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to estimate the fracture-related direct medical costs during the first year following a fragility nonvertebral fracture in a managed care setting. This was a retrospective cohort study conducted among patients (aged 45+ years) with a primary diagnosis for a fragility nonvertebral fracture between July 1, 2000, and December 31, 2000, using MarketScan, an integrated administrative, medical, and pharmacy claims database. All patients had 6 months of observation prior to their fracture and 12 months following a nonvertebral fracture. Fracture-related direct medical costs were evaluated in the 12-month period following fracture diagnosis using 2003 Medicare fee schedule payments. The costs per fracture per year (PFPY) for specific nonvertebral fracture sites were determined, as well as costs by type of care (i.e., outpatient, inpatient, and other). A total of 4,477 women and men fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The sample was comprised of 73% women and the mean age was 70 years. The most prevalent nonvertebral fracture sites were wrist/forearm (37%), hip (25%), and humerus (15%). Mean total costs per patient per year were highest for fractures of the hip ($26,856), femur ($14,805), tibia ($10,224), and pelvis ($10,198). On average, 84% of the annual fracture-related costs were inpatient; 3% were outpatient, and 13% were long-term care and other costs. In a patient population aged 45+ years, the first month following a nonvertebral fracture has a major impact on medical care costs. The most costly nonvertebral fracture sites were hip, femur, and tibia fractures.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone/economics , Health Care Costs , Age Distribution , Aged , Ambulatory Care/economics , Female , Femoral Fractures/economics , Forearm Injuries/economics , Hip Fractures/economics , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Humeral Fractures/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Pelvis/injuries , Retrospective Studies , Sex Distribution , Tibial Fractures/economics , Wrist Injuries/economics
16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16298809

ABSTRACT

Patients with injured hands and forearms of varying severity [Hand Injury Severity Score (HISS)] were studied prospectively, including analysis of costs, hand/arm function (DASH), and health status (SF-36). Costs, duration of sick-leave, DASH-score (high score; impaired function) increased by severity of injury (higher HISS) and the greatest proportion of total costs resulted from lost production. Most employed patients returned to work within a year, but even minor injuries were expensive. HISS and costs of care during an emergency were significantly associated with duration of sick-leave, although HISS did not fully explain variation in costs and duration of sick-leave. DASH-score at one year was associated with variation in age, HISS, and residual health care costs. Results of DASH and subgroups for physical and bodily pain on SF-36 were consistent. Injuries to hand and forearm may generate high costs for society in terms of health care and long periods of sick-leave (lost production), but even minor injuries should be accounted for.


Subject(s)
Forearm Injuries/economics , Forearm Injuries/epidemiology , Hand Injuries/economics , Hand Injuries/epidemiology , Accidents/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Disability Evaluation , Female , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Status , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Leisure Activities , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Regression Analysis , Sick Leave/economics , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , Sweden/epidemiology
17.
Osteoporos Int ; 16(1): 78-85, 2005 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15167988

ABSTRACT

Vertebral fractures are believed to be important predictors for future vertebral and other fractures, leading to at least a 4- to 5-fold increase in the risk of subsequent fractures. However, little is known about their associated near-term costs. The purpose of this study was to quantify the subsequent fracture and cost outcomes emanating from patients with an incident vertebral fracture. A probabilistic decision analysis model was developed to estimate the expected cost of all subsequent fractures. We ran Kaplan-Meier time-to-event models on placebo patients in risedronate's pivotal phase III clinical trial data to determine the cumulative incidence or probabilities of all fractures within one year of an incident vertebral fracture. Unit costs for health care payers in the USA and Sweden for vertebral, hip, other, and forearm/wrist fractures were multiplied by fracture probabilities to generate the expected costs of new fractures within one year of incident vertebral fractures. Our analysis found that that 26.1% of vertebral fracture patients with a mean age of 74 years refractured within 1 year (vertebral 17.4%; hip 3.6%; "other" 3.5%; forearm/wrist 1.6%). The calculated medical costs for those patients who refracture within 1 year was $5906 and 3670 euros for the USA and Sweden, respectively, while the weighted average cost across all patients (refracture and non-fracture) within a year of their incident fracture was $1541 (USA) and 958 euros (Sweden). These results suggest that therapies with proven, rapid efficacy may offer important economic value to healthcare payers, providers and patients.


Subject(s)
Outcome Assessment, Health Care/economics , Spinal Fractures/economics , Aged , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Costs and Cost Analysis/methods , Decision Trees , Female , Forearm Injuries/economics , Forearm Injuries/etiology , Hip Fractures/economics , Hip Fractures/etiology , Humans , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporosis/economics , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Probability , Recurrence , Spinal Fractures/etiology , Wrist Injuries/economics , Wrist Injuries/etiology
18.
J Hand Surg Br ; 30(1): 35-9, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15620489

ABSTRACT

This study analysed the costs of median and ulnar nerve injuries in the forearm in humans and factors affecting such costs. The costs within the health-care sector and costs of lost production were calculated in 69 patients with an injury to the median and/or ulnar nerve in the forearm, usually caused by glass, a knife, or a razorblade. Factors associated with the variation in costs and outcome were analysed. The total median costs for an employed person with a median and an ulnar nerve injury were EUR 51,238 and EUR 31,186, respectively, and 87% of the total costs were due to loss of production. All costs were higher for patients with concomitant tendon injuries (4 tendons). The costs within the health-care sector were also higher for patients who changed work after the injury and if both nerves were injured. Outcome was dependent on age and repair method.


Subject(s)
Forearm Injuries/complications , Median Nerve/injuries , Rehabilitation/economics , Trauma, Nervous System/economics , Ulnar Nerve/injuries , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Forearm Injuries/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sweden , Trauma, Nervous System/etiology
19.
Chirurg ; 68(11): 1126-31, 1997 Nov.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9518203

ABSTRACT

In a retrospective study from 1986 to 1995, 64 forearm fractures were treated with brace. Clinical and roentgenographic follow-up data were available for 49 patients (76.6%). There were 49.0% ulna shaft, 38.9% radius and 12.2% forearm fractures. The average time to healing was 10.2 weeks. Functional results were excellent in 57.1%, good in 34.7% and poor in 8.2% of cases. Two (4.1%) fractures (radius, forearm shaft) were not considered as healed and were re-operated with plate osteosynthesis. The ideal indication for fracture bracing is ulna shaft fracture. Radius and forearm shaft fractures can also be treated, but patients must be informed about the long time to healing and operative alternatives.


Subject(s)
Forearm Injuries/therapy , Fractures, Bone/therapy , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Braces , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Forearm Injuries/complications , Forearm Injuries/economics , Forearm Injuries/physiopathology , Fracture Healing , Fractures, Bone/complications , Fractures, Bone/economics , Fractures, Bone/physiopathology , Germany , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
20.
Bone ; 15(4): 377-86, 1994.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7917575

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study is to estimate the short- and long-term direct health care costs of hip, spine, and forearm fractures occurring during the remaining lifetimes of white post-menopausal women and to provide a prototype for estimating avoided costs of fractures in future cost-effectiveness analyses. A Markov model that uses population-based data and Monte Carlo simulations to estimate lifetime fracture risk, fracture-related functional impairment, and fracture-related costs for cohorts of individuals while controlling for competing causes of functional impairment and, hence, long-term costs is presented. Five cohorts of 10,000 women, each of a different age group, were simulated to obtain estimates of remaining lifetime fractures, functional impairment, and costs. Additional simulations tested the impact of discharge rates to and continued residence in nursing homes. Acute fracture care costs, nursing home annual cost, cost of community-based long-term care, and discount rates were varied in sensitivity analyses. Cohort costs were applied to the 1990 population distribution of U.S. white women to project future costs of women currently aged 45 years of age and older. Among hip, spine, and forearm fractures, hip fractures were determined to account for 36-50% of remaining lifetime fractures depending on age group of the cohort. Similarly, hip fractures were determined to account for 67-79% of fracture-related dependent functioning, 87-100% of fracture-related nursing home placement, and 87-96% of short-term fracture costs. Among white U.S. women aged 45 or older, an estimated 5.2 million hip, spine, and forearm fractures; 2 million person-years of fracture-related functional impairment; and $45.2 billion total direct medical costs can be expected in the next 10 years. Women aged 65-84 were estimated to experience the largest number of fractures, person-years of fracture-related impaired function, and fracture care costs in the next 10 years. Estimated lifetime cost was particularly sensitive to assumptions about fracture-related nursing home utilization rates. The future health and economic impact of established osteoporosis is expected to be substantial. Because we have included only three fracture sites, our estimates are likely to be conservative. Osteoporosis interventions that can reduce the need for fracture-related extended nursing home care and that are effective among women aged 65-84 are likely to be particularly cost-effective.


Subject(s)
Forearm Injuries/economics , Hip Fractures/economics , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/complications , Radius Fractures/economics , Spinal Fractures/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Forearm Injuries/etiology , Hip Fractures/etiology , Humans , Markov Chains , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Monte Carlo Method , Outpatients , Radius Fractures/etiology , Risk Factors , Spinal Fractures/etiology , United States , White People
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...