ABSTRACT
Fossil fuels-coal, oil and gas-supply most of the world's energy and also form the basis of many products essential for everyday life. Their use is the largest contributor to the carbon dioxide emissions that drive global climate change, prompting joint efforts to find renewable alternatives that might enable a carbon-neutral society by as early as 2050. There are clear paths for renewable electricity to replace fossil-fuel-based energy, but the transport fuels and chemicals produced in oil refineries will still be needed. We can attempt to close the carbon cycle associated with their use by electrifying refinery processes and by changing the raw materials that go into a refinery from fossils fuels to carbon dioxide for making hydrocarbon fuels and to agricultural and municipal waste for making chemicals and polymers. We argue that, with sufficient long-term commitment and support, the science and technology for such a completely fossil-free refinery, delivering the products required after 2050 (less fuels, more chemicals), could be developed. This future refinery will require substantially larger areas and greater mineral resources than is the case at present and critically depends on the capacity to generate large amounts of renewable energy for hydrogen production and carbon dioxide capture.
Subject(s)
Carbon Dioxide , Fossil Fuels , Oil and Gas Industry , Renewable Energy , Carbon Cycle , Carbon Dioxide/adverse effects , Carbon Dioxide/isolation & purification , Coal/adverse effects , Coal/supply & distribution , Fossil Fuels/adverse effects , Fossil Fuels/supply & distribution , Hydrogen/chemistry , Natural Gas/adverse effects , Natural Gas/supply & distribution , Petroleum/adverse effects , Petroleum/supply & distribution , Renewable Energy/statistics & numerical data , Oil and Gas Industry/methods , Oil and Gas Industry/trendsSubject(s)
Congresses as Topic , Environmental Policy , Fossil Fuels , Global Warming , Leadership , Congresses as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Environmental Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Environmental Policy/trends , Fossil Fuels/supply & distribution , Global Warming/prevention & controlSubject(s)
Congresses as Topic , Fossil Fuels , Global Warming , Renewable Energy , Sustainable Development , Fossil Fuels/supply & distribution , Global Warming/legislation & jurisprudence , Global Warming/prevention & control , Congresses as Topic/trends , Sustainable Development/legislation & jurisprudence , Sustainable Development/trends , Renewable Energy/legislation & jurisprudenceSubject(s)
Congresses as Topic , Global Warming/legislation & jurisprudence , Global Warming/prevention & control , Leadership , Political Activism , Age Factors , Animals , Developed Countries , Developing Countries , Extinction, Biological , Extreme Weather , Fossil Fuels/economics , Fossil Fuels/supply & distribution , Global Warming/economics , Humans , Scotland , Social Justice/legislation & jurisprudence , Sustainable Development/economics , Sustainable Development/legislation & jurisprudence , United Nations/organization & administrationABSTRACT
Parties to the 2015 Paris Agreement pledged to limit global warming to well below 2 °C and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C relative to pre-industrial times1. However, fossil fuels continue to dominate the global energy system and a sharp decline in their use must be realized to keep the temperature increase below 1.5 °C (refs. 2-7). Here we use a global energy systems model8 to assess the amount of fossil fuels that would need to be left in the ground, regionally and globally, to allow for a 50 per cent probability of limiting warming to 1.5 °C. By 2050, we find that nearly 60 per cent of oil and fossil methane gas, and 90 per cent of coal must remain unextracted to keep within a 1.5 °C carbon budget. This is a large increase in the unextractable estimates for a 2 °C carbon budget9, particularly for oil, for which an additional 25 per cent of reserves must remain unextracted. Furthermore, we estimate that oil and gas production must decline globally by 3 per cent each year until 2050. This implies that most regions must reach peak production now or during the next decade, rendering many operational and planned fossil fuel projects unviable. We probably present an underestimate of the production changes required, because a greater than 50 per cent probability of limiting warming to 1.5 °C requires more carbon to stay in the ground and because of uncertainties around the timely deployment of negative emission technologies at scale.
Subject(s)
Conservation of Energy Resources/legislation & jurisprudence , Fossil Fuels/analysis , Fossil Fuels/supply & distribution , Global Warming/prevention & control , International Cooperation/legislation & jurisprudence , Models, Theoretical , Temperature , Fuel Oils/analysis , Fuel Oils/supply & distribution , Geographic Mapping , Global Warming/legislation & jurisprudence , Methane/analysis , Methane/supply & distribution , Paris , Probability , Time Factors , UncertaintySubject(s)
Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Environmental Science/legislation & jurisprudence , Federal Government , Global Warming/legislation & jurisprudence , Global Warming/prevention & control , Internationality , Liability, Legal , Extreme Weather , Fossil Fuels/supply & distribution , Goals , Humans , Political Activism/trendsSubject(s)
Developing Countries/economics , Fossil Fuels/economics , Fossil Fuels/supply & distribution , Poverty/economics , Poverty/trends , Renewable Energy/economics , Renewable Energy/legislation & jurisprudence , Africa , Carbon Dioxide/metabolism , Developed Countries/economics , Humans , Sustainable Development/economics , Sustainable Development/legislation & jurisprudenceSubject(s)
COVID-19/economics , Developing Countries/economics , Environmental Policy/trends , External Debt , Global Warming/economics , Investments/economics , Risk Management , COVID-19/epidemiology , Developed Countries/economics , Environmental Policy/economics , Federal Government , Fossil Fuels/economics , Fossil Fuels/supply & distribution , Global Warming/prevention & control , Global Warming/statistics & numerical data , Gross Domestic Product/trends , Humans , Pandemics/economics , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Poverty/economics , Private Sector/economics , Renewable Energy/economics , Renewable Energy/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , Time FactorsSubject(s)
Carbon Footprint/legislation & jurisprudence , Conservation of Natural Resources/legislation & jurisprudence , Earth, Planet , Environmental Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Political Activism , Carbon Footprint/economics , Fossil Fuels/economics , Fossil Fuels/supply & distribution , LobbyingSubject(s)
Environmental Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Environmental Policy/trends , Global Warming/prevention & control , Global Warming/statistics & numerical data , Goals , International Cooperation/legislation & jurisprudence , Fossil Fuels/economics , Fossil Fuels/supply & distribution , Global Warming/legislation & jurisprudence , Paris , Renewable Energy/economics , Renewable Energy/statistics & numerical data , Temperature , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Atmospheric methane (CH4) is a potent greenhouse gas, and its mole fraction has more than doubled since the preindustrial era1. Fossil fuel extraction and use are among the largest anthropogenic sources of CH4 emissions, but the precise magnitude of these contributions is a subject of debate2,3. Carbon-14 in CH4 (14CH4) can be used to distinguish between fossil (14C-free) CH4 emissions and contemporaneous biogenic sources; however, poorly constrained direct 14CH4 emissions from nuclear reactors have complicated this approach since the middle of the 20th century4,5. Moreover, the partitioning of total fossil CH4 emissions (presently 172 to 195 teragrams CH4 per year)2,3 between anthropogenic and natural geological sources (such as seeps and mud volcanoes) is under debate; emission inventories suggest that the latter account for about 40 to 60 teragrams CH4 per year6,7. Geological emissions were less than 15.4 teragrams CH4 per year at the end of the Pleistocene, about 11,600 years ago8, but that period is an imperfect analogue for present-day emissions owing to the large terrestrial ice sheet cover, lower sea level and extensive permafrost. Here we use preindustrial-era ice core 14CH4 measurements to show that natural geological CH4 emissions to the atmosphere were about 1.6 teragrams CH4 per year, with a maximum of 5.4 teragrams CH4 per year (95 per cent confidence limit)-an order of magnitude lower than the currently used estimates. This result indicates that anthropogenic fossil CH4 emissions are underestimated by about 38 to 58 teragrams CH4 per year, or about 25 to 40 per cent of recent estimates. Our record highlights the human impact on the atmosphere and climate, provides a firm target for inventories of the global CH4 budget, and will help to inform strategies for targeted emission reductions9,10.
Subject(s)
Atmosphere/chemistry , Fossil Fuels/history , Fossil Fuels/supply & distribution , Human Activities/history , Methane/analysis , Methane/history , Biomass , Carbon Radioisotopes , Coal/history , Coal/supply & distribution , Global Warming/prevention & control , Global Warming/statistics & numerical data , History, 18th Century , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Ice Cover/chemistry , Methane/chemistry , Natural Gas/history , Natural Gas/supply & distribution , Petroleum/history , Petroleum/supply & distributionSubject(s)
Construction Materials/supply & distribution , Geologic Sediments/analysis , Mining/legislation & jurisprudence , Mining/statistics & numerical data , Animals , Commerce/economics , Commerce/trends , Conservation of Natural Resources/legislation & jurisprudence , Conservation of Natural Resources/statistics & numerical data , Conservation of Natural Resources/trends , Construction Materials/economics , Ecosystem , Fossil Fuels/supply & distribution , Geologic Sediments/chemistry , Glass/chemistry , International Cooperation , Mining/economics , Recycling/trends , Rivers/chemistry , Time FactorsSubject(s)
Air Pollution/prevention & control , Global Warming/prevention & control , Public Health/statistics & numerical data , Renewable Energy/statistics & numerical data , Research Report , Acclimatization , Air Pollution/statistics & numerical data , Environmental Policy , Floods/statistics & numerical data , Food Supply/statistics & numerical data , Fossil Fuels/supply & distribution , Global Warming/mortality , Global Warming/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infrared RaysABSTRACT
Net anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) must approach zero by mid-century (2050) in order to stabilize the global mean temperature at the level targeted by international efforts1-5. Yet continued expansion of fossil-fuel-burning energy infrastructure implies already 'committed' future CO2 emissions6-13. Here we use detailed datasets of existing fossil-fuel energy infrastructure in 2018 to estimate regional and sectoral patterns of committed CO2 emissions, the sensitivity of such emissions to assumed operating lifetimes and schedules, and the economic value of the associated infrastructure. We estimate that, if operated as historically, existing infrastructure will cumulatively emit about 658 gigatonnes of CO2 (with a range of 226 to 1,479 gigatonnes CO2, depending on the lifetimes and utilization rates assumed). More than half of these emissions are predicted to come from the electricity sector; infrastructure in China, the USA and the 28 member states of the European Union represents approximately 41 per cent, 9 per cent and 7 per cent of the total, respectively. If built, proposed power plants (planned, permitted or under construction) would emit roughly an extra 188 (range 37-427) gigatonnes CO2. Committed emissions from existing and proposed energy infrastructure (about 846 gigatonnes CO2) thus represent more than the entire carbon budget that remains if mean warming is to be limited to 1.5 degrees Celsius (°C) with a probability of 66 to 50 per cent (420-580 gigatonnes CO2)5, and perhaps two-thirds of the remaining carbon budget if mean warming is to be limited to less than 2 °C (1,170-1,500 gigatonnes CO2)5. The remaining carbon budget estimates are varied and nuanced14,15, and depend on the climate target and the availability of large-scale negative emissions16. Nevertheless, our estimates suggest that little or no new CO2-emitting infrastructure can be commissioned, and that existing infrastructure may need to be retired early (or be retrofitted with carbon capture and storage technology) in order to meet the Paris Agreement climate goals17. Given the asset value per tonne of committed emissions, we suggest that the most cost-effective premature infrastructure retirements will be in the electricity and industry sectors, if non-emitting alternatives are available and affordable4,18.