Subject(s)
Dog Diseases/diagnosis , Fractures, Compression/veterinary , Paraplegia/veterinary , Spondylitis/veterinary , Animals , Dog Diseases/etiology , Dog Diseases/therapy , Dogs , Fractures, Compression/complications , Fractures, Compression/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Compression/therapy , Male , Paraplegia/diagnosis , Paraplegia/etiology , Spondylitis/complications , Spondylitis/diagnostic imaging , Spondylitis/therapyABSTRACT
A 6-month-old intact female giant schnauzer dog fed a nutritionally unbalanced homemade diet was evaluated because of a 1-month history of lameness and difficulty walking. Abnormalities identified on ancillary tests, in conjunction with the dog's clinical improvement following diet change, suggested a diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency and nutritional secondary hyperparathyroidism. This report underlines the importance of appropriate feeding management, especially during the vulnerable growth phase.
Déséquilibres alimentaires chez un chiot de grande race causant des fractures de compression, une carence en vitamine D et de l'hyperparathyroïdisme soupçonné secondaire à la nutrition. Une chienne Schnauzer géante intacte âgée de 6 mois qui consommait une diète maison qui n'était pas équilibrée sur le plan nutritionnel a été évaluée en raison d'une anamnèse de 1 mois de boiterie et de difficultés ambulatoires. Les anomalies identifiées sur des tests ancillaires, de concert avec l'amélioration clinique du chien après le changement de diète, suggéraient un diagnostic de carence en vitamine D et d'hyperparathyroïdisme nutritionnel secondaire. Ce rapport souligne l'importance d'une gestion appropriée de l'alimentation, particulièrement durant la phase de croissance vulnérable.(Traduit par Isabelle Vallières).
Subject(s)
Animal Feed/analysis , Diet/veterinary , Dog Diseases/etiology , Fractures, Compression/veterinary , Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary/veterinary , Vitamin D Deficiency/veterinary , Animals , Diet/standards , Dog Diseases/pathology , Dogs , Female , Fractures, Compression/etiology , Lameness, Animal/etiology , Malnutrition/veterinary , Vitamin D Deficiency/etiologyABSTRACT
Fraturas ósseas podem ser corrigidas com a utilização de fixadores esqueléticos externos (FEE), método de estabilização bastante comum. Para tanto, têm-se utilizado barras conectoras de polimetilmetacrilato (PMMA) sem critério de diâmetro, as quais podem quebrar, se ficarem muito delgadas, ou ocasionar incômodo, quando muito pesadas e volumosas. O objetivo deste trabalho foi testar, por meio de ensaio biomecânico de compressão axial e flexão, qual é o diâmetro ideal da barra conectora de PMMA, correlacionado com o diâmetro ósseo para utilização em FEE tipo Ia. Utilizaram-se 24 úmeros para se realizarem medidas de comprimento, diâmetro, circunferência e ensaios biomecânicos. Após, foram confeccionadas barras de 1,5 vezes a média do diâmetro ósseo (grupo I), do mesmo diâmetro ósseo (grupo II) e de 0,5 vezes o diâmetro (grupo III). Com os resultados obtidos ao se compararem os valores dos ossos com os dos grupos II e III, verificou-se que as barras conectoras do grupo II mostraram-se mais resistentes do que o tecido ósseo no ensaio de compressão. No ensaio de flexão, os ossos resistiram mais quando comparados aos grupos II e III, sendo 4,3 vezes mais resistentes do que o grupo III nesse mesmo ensaio mecânico. Os resultados permitem um direcionamento para confecção de barras considerando-se o diâmetro ósseo como referência.(AU)
Bone fractures can be corrected from external skeletal fixators (ESF) in a fairly common internal stabilization method, in which connector bars polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is used. PMMA is used without criterion of diameter, and it can break if it is too thin or too heavy. It can be uncomfortable when bulky. The aim of this study was to test, through biomechanical axial compression and bending which is the ideal connector bar diameter PMMA, correlated to bone diameter for use in type Ia ESF. Twenty-four humerus were used to make measurements of length, diameter, circumference, and biomechanical testing. After the bars confected with 1.5 times the average diameter of the bone (group I), the same diameter (group II) and 0.5 times the diameter of the bone (group III). With the obtained results, using GII and GIII results, it was observed that the connector bars in group II were more resistant than the bones in the compression test. In the bending test, the bones resisted flexion strength when compared to group III and the group II was 4.3 times more resistant than group III in the same mechanical test. The results allow a direction for making bars considering bone diameter as a reference.(AU)
