LI-RADS in the year 2020 - Are you already using it or still considering? / LI-RADS im Jahr 2020 ­ Nutzt du es schon oder überlegst du noch?

PURPOSE: The working group for gastrointestinal and abdominal imaging within the German Radiological Society performed a nationwide online survey in order to assess the current status regarding the awareness and application of LI-RADS, a classification for evaluation of liver lesions in patients at risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the website www.deutsches-krankenhausverzeichnis.de a list of hospitals was generated meeting the criteria internal medicine, gastroenterology, general and visceral surgery and radiology (n = 391). Randomly, 102 department directors were contacted, and asked to name one consultant and one resident from their department in order to participate in the survey. 177 potential participants were invited to fill out an approximately 10-minute online survey in the form of 17 questions regarding the awareness and application of LI-RADS. The results of the survey were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics. RESULTS: 77 participants were registered, which corresponds to a response rate of 43.5 %. 47 % of all participants were radiologists, 30 % surgeons and 23 % internal doctors/gastroenterologists, respectively, many with more than 13 years of professional experience (37.2 %). The majority of participants worked in a hospital with a focus (37.2 %) or a university hospital (29.1 %). Even though the majority of participants knows about or has heard of LI-RADS (73.2 %), only a minority uses the classification themselves (26 %) or within the context of tumor boards (19.2 %). CONCLUSION: The results of our survey demonstrate that LI-RADS is relatively known in Germany, the application however quite sparse. This is in contrast to the general desire and endeavor for more standardized reporting in radiology. KEY POINTS: · LI-RADS is not yet broadly implemented in clinical routine in Germany. · The sparse application is in contrast to the general desire for more standardized reporting in radiology. · Interdisciplinary education may support the propagation and use of the LI-RDAS classification. CITATION FORMAT: · Ringe KI, Gut A, Grenacher L et al. LI-RADS in the year 2020 - Are you already using it or still considering? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 186 - 193.

Challenges for the future: the gastroenterology specialist workforce in New Zealand.

AIM: New Zealand has among the highest rates of colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease in the world. With the imminent rollout of the National Bowel Screening Programme, we sought to determine the capacity of and demand faced by the current gastroenterology specialist workforce, and to compare it with other countries. METHOD: Specialists in gastroenterology were asked to complete a questionnaire on their education, number of FTE in the public and private sectors, number of colonoscopies performed, anticipated years to retirement and other associated information. Additional statistics were obtained from personal communication, visits to endoscopy units throughout the country and government datasets. RESULTS: In November 2017 there were 93 gastroenterologists in New Zealand, equating to 1.96 gastroenterologist specialists/100,000 population. The response rate was 55%. One quarter of gastroenterologists spent time working in general internal medicine additionally to gastroenterology in public hospitals. Fifty-one percent of gastroenterologists were older than 50 years and 42% aimed to retire within the next 10 years. Four of the 20 district health boards had no gastroenterologists in post. CONCLUSIONS: New Zealand has a lower specialist gastroenterologist ratio and older workforce compared with other comparable western countries and may struggle to meet the growing gastroenterology healthcare needs of the population. Substantial regional gastroenterology service inequities exist across the country.

How Do Hepatologists Gain Access to Liver Transplant Units?

Liver transplantation has evolved from an experimental treatment to be considered as the most effective therapy for end-stage liver disease and selected cases of hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplant hepatologists must have specific knowledge and abilities to treat those patients who receive a liver transplant. In Spain, approximately 1100 liver transplants are performed each year, and most centers assume both postoperative care and long-term follow-up, which has led to a significant work load in liver transplant units. Despite previous attempts to establish an official training program in hepatology, the Spanish health system does not presently have a specific liver transplant training program to guarantee that future needs of physicians are covered. Collaboration between health authorities and scientific societies is required to guarantee adequate assistance to liver transplant recipients in the future.

Access to Specialists and Emergency Department Visits in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The number of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]-related visits to the emergency department [ED] is increasing in North America. This study evaluates the relationship between access to specialists and utilization of ED services. METHODS: We conducted a population-based study of all IBD patients in Ontario in 2014-2015 to measure utilization of non-emergency IBD care by specialists [NICS] and ED visits. After characterizing regional variation in access to gastroenterologists and region-wide implementation of NICS, we constructed regression models to determine whether they were predictors of individual utilization of NICS and ED services. RESULTS: The number of gastroenterologists per 1000 IBD patients varied geographically, ranging from 1.13 to 10.65, as did the region-wide proportion of patients who received NICS, ranging from 21% to 52%. Compared with those with low access to gastroenterologists, those living in areas with moderate (odds ratio [OR], 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.27-2.47) and high [OR, 1.83; 95% CI: 1.71-1.95] access were more likely to receive NICS. The risk of visits to the ED was lower among those residing in regions with moderate [OR, 0.78; 95% CI: 0.75-0.82] and high access [OR, 0.74; 95% CI: 0.69-0.80] to gastroenterologists and in regions where implementation of NICS was not low [OR, 0.78; 95% CI: 0.75-0.81]. CONCLUSIONS: Poor access to outpatient IBD specialist care contributes to IBD-related ED visits. Strategies to increase specialist access may reduce the utilization of emergency services.

The Drivers of Discretionary Utilization: Clinical History Versus Physician Supply.

PURPOSE: Because the effect of physician supply on utilization remains controversial, literature based on non-Medicare populations is sparse, and a physician supply expansion is under way, the potential for physician-induced demand across diverse populations is important to understand. A substantial proportion of gastrointestinal endoscopies may be inappropriate. The authors analyzed the impact of physician supply, practice patterns, and clinical history on esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD, defined as discretionary) among patients hospitalized with lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB). METHOD: Among 34,344 patients hospitalized for LGIB from 2004 to 2009, 43.1% and 21.3% had a colonoscopy or EGD, respectively, during the index hospitalization or within 6 months after. Linking to the Dartmouth Atlas via patients' hospital referral region, gastroenterologist density and hospital care intensity (HCI) index were ascertained. Adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities, and race/education indicators, the association of gastroenterologist density, HCI index, and history of upper gastrointestinal disease with EGD was estimated using logistic regression. RESULTS: EGD was not associated with gastroenterologist density or HCI index, but was associated with a history of upper gastrointestinal disease (OR 2.30; 95% CI 2.17-2.43), peptic ulcer disease (OR 4.82; 95% CI 4.26-5.45), and liver disease (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.18-1.54). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized with LGIB, large variation in gastroenterologist density did not predict EGD, but relevant clinical history did, with association strengths commensurate with risk for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. In the scenario studied, no evidence was found that specialty physician supply increases will result in more discretionary care within commercially insured populations.