Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 65
Filter
2.
J Virol ; 97(12): e0133423, 2023 Dec 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37982648

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Although HIV replication can be effectively inhibited by antiretroviral therapy, this does not result in a cure as the available drugs do not inactivate the integrated HIV-1 DNA in infected cells. Consequently, HIV-infected individuals need lifelong therapy to prevent viral rebound. Several preclinical studies indicate that CRISPR-Cas gene-editing systems can be used to achieve permanent inactivation of the viral DNA. It was previously shown that this inactivation was due to small inactivating mutations at the targeted sites in the HIV genome and to excision or inversion of the viral DNA fragment between two target sites. We, here, demonstrate that CRISPR-Cas treatment also causes large unintended deletions, which can include surrounding chromosomal sequences. As the loss of chromosomal sequences may cause oncogenic transformation of the cell, such unintended large deletions form a potential safety risk in clinical application of this antiviral application and possibly all CRISPR-Cas gene-editing approaches.


Subject(s)
CRISPR-Cas Systems , DNA, Viral , Gene Editing , HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Proviruses , Sequence Deletion , Humans , CRISPR-Cas Systems/genetics , DNA, Viral/genetics , Gene Editing/methods , Gene Editing/standards , HIV Infections/genetics , HIV Infections/therapy , HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1/genetics , Proviruses/genetics , Chromosome Deletion , Patient Safety
5.
Lab Anim ; 56(1): 69-82, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34192966

ABSTRACT

The emergence of an array of genome-editing tools in recent years has facilitated the introduction of genetic modifications directly into the embryo, increasing the ease, efficiency and catalogue of alleles accessible to researchers across a range of species. Bypassing the requirement for a selection cassette and resulting in a broad range of outcomes besides the desired allele, genome editing has altered the allele validation process both temporally and technically. Whereas traditional gene targeting relies upon selection and allows allele validation at the embryonic stem cell modification stage, screening for the presence of the intended allele now occurs in the (frequently mosaic) founder animals. Final confirmation of the edited allele can only take place at the subsequent G1 generation and the validation strategy must differentiate the desired allele from a range of unintended outcomes. Here we present some of the challenges posed by gene editing, strategies for validation and considerations for animal colony management.


Subject(s)
Gene Editing , Genetic Testing , Alleles , Animals , Embryo, Mammalian , Gene Editing/methods , Gene Editing/standards , Reproducibility of Results
7.
Mol Genet Metab ; 134(1-2): 117-131, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34340879

ABSTRACT

Gene therapy is the delivery of a therapeutic gene for endogenous cellular expression with the goal of rescuing a disease phenotype. It has been used to treat an increasing number of human diseases with many strategies proving safe and efficacious in clinical trials. Gene delivery may be viral or non-viral, performed in vivo or ex vivo, and relies on gene integration or transient expression; all of these techniques have been applied to the treatment of Fabry disease. Fabry disease is a genetic disorder of the α-galactosidase A gene, GLA, that causes an accumulation of glycosphingolipids in cells leading to cardiac, renal and cerebrovascular damage and eventually death. Currently, there are no curative treatments available, and the therapies that are used have significant drawbacks. These treatment concerns have led to the advent of gene therapies for Fabry disease. The first Fabry patients to receive gene therapy were treated with recombinant lentivirus targeting their hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Adeno-associated virus treatments have also begun. Alternatively, the field of gene-editing is a new and rapidly growing field. Gene-editing has been used to repair disease-causing mutations or insert genes into cellular DNA. These techniques have the potential to be applied to the treatment of Fabry disease provided the concerns of gene-editing technology, such as safety and efficiency, were addressed. This review focuses on the current state of gene therapy as it is being developed for Fabry disease, including progresses and challenges as well as an overview of gene-editing and how it may be applied to correct Fabry disease-causing mutations in the future.


Subject(s)
Fabry Disease/genetics , Fabry Disease/therapy , Gene Editing/methods , Gene Editing/standards , Genetic Therapy/methods , Humans , Mutation , Phenotype , alpha-Galactosidase/genetics
8.
Mol Genet Metab ; 134(1-2): 77-86, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34391646

ABSTRACT

CRISPR/Cas9-based technology has revolutionized biomedical research by providing a high-fidelity gene-editing method, foreshadowing a significant impact on the therapeutics of many human genetic disorders previously considered untreatable. However, off-target events represent a critical hurdle before genome editing can be fully established in clinical practice. This mini-review recapitulates some recent advances for detecting and overcoming off-target effects mediated by the CRISPR/Cas9 system that could increase the likelihood of clinical success of the CRISPR-based approaches.


Subject(s)
CRISPR-Cas Systems/genetics , Gene Editing/methods , Gene Editing/standards , Humans
9.
J Gene Med ; 23(11): e3377, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34270141

ABSTRACT

The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) system is a state-of-the-art tool for versatile genome editing that has advanced basic research dramatically, with great potential for clinic applications. The system consists of two key molecules: a CRISPR-associated (Cas) effector nuclease and a single guide RNA. The simplicity of the system has enabled the development of a wide spectrum of derivative methods. Almost any laboratory can utilize these methods, although new users may initially be confused when faced with the potentially overwhelming abundance of choices. Cas nucleases and their engineering have been systematically reviewed previously. In the present review, we discuss single guide RNA engineering and design strategies that facilitate more efficient, more specific and safer gene editing.


Subject(s)
CRISPR-Cas Systems , Gene Editing/methods , Gene Editing/standards , Genetic Engineering/methods , Genetic Engineering/standards , RNA, Guide, Kinetoplastida , Animals , Endonucleases/genetics , Humans
10.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 35(5): e23746, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33826163

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) status induced by MLH1 protein deficiency plays a pivotal role in therapeutic decision-making for cancer patients. Appropriate quality control (QC) materials are necessary for monitoring the accuracy of MLH1 protein deficiency assays used in clinical laboratories. METHODS: CRISPR/Cas9 technology was used to edit the MLH1 gene of GM12878Cas9 cells to establish MLH1 protein-deficient cell lines. The positive cell lines were screened and validated by Sanger sequencing, Western blot (WB), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) and were then used to prepare formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples through xenografting. These FFPE samples were tested by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for suitability as novel QC materials for MLH1 protein deficiency testing. RESULTS: We successfully cultured 358 monoclonal cells, with a survival rate of 37.3% (358/960) of the sorted monoclonal cells. Through Sanger sequencing, cell lines with MLH1 gene mutation were identified. Subsequently, two cell lines with MLH1 protein deficiency were identified by WB and named as GM12878Cas9_6 and GM12878Cas9_10. The NGS results further confirmed that the MLH1 gene mutation in these two cell lines would cause the formation of stop codons and terminate the expression of the MLH1 protein. The H&E staining and IHC results also verified the deficiency of the MLH1 protein, and FFPE samples from xenografts proved their similarity and consistency with clinical samples. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully established MLH1 protein-deficient cell lines. Followed by xenografting, we developed novel FFPE QC materials with homogenous, sustainable, and typical histological structures advantages that are suitable for the standardization of clinical IHC methods.


Subject(s)
CRISPR-Cas Systems/genetics , Gene Editing/standards , MutL Protein Homolog 1/deficiency , MutL Protein Homolog 1/genetics , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays , Animals , Base Sequence , Cell Line , Humans , Mice, Inbred NOD , Mice, SCID , Mutation/genetics , Quality Control
12.
Brief Bioinform ; 22(1): 308-314, 2021 01 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32008042

ABSTRACT

The use of machine learning (ML) has become prevalent in the genome engineering space, with applications ranging from predicting target site efficiency to forecasting the outcome of repair events. However, jargon and ML-specific accuracy measures have made it hard to assess the validity of individual approaches, potentially leading to misinterpretation of ML results. This review aims to close the gap by discussing ML approaches and pitfalls in the context of CRISPR gene-editing applications. Specifically, we address common considerations, such as algorithm choice, as well as problems, such as overestimating accuracy and data interoperability, by providing tangible examples from the genome-engineering domain. Equipping researchers with the knowledge to effectively use ML to better design gene-editing experiments and predict experimental outcomes will help advance the field more rapidly.


Subject(s)
CRISPR-Cas Systems , Gene Editing/methods , Machine Learning , Animals , Gene Editing/standards , Genomics/methods , Genomics/standards , Humans
13.
Trends Biotechnol ; 39(5): 427-430, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33160679

ABSTRACT

Recent reporting found that a number of scientists internationally knew about the experiment resulting in the birth of the first gene-edited babies well before the news broke. Because scientists have a responsibility to reveal such activities, an international governance mechanism for reporting unethical gene editing experiments should be established.


Subject(s)
Gene Editing , Germ Cells , Research Design , Gene Editing/ethics , Gene Editing/standards , International Cooperation
14.
Int J Mol Sci ; 21(24)2020 Dec 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33339441

ABSTRACT

The discovery of clustered, regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and their cooperation with CRISPR-associated (Cas) genes is one of the greatest advances of the century and has marked their application as a powerful genome engineering tool. The CRISPR-Cas system was discovered as a part of the adaptive immune system in bacteria and archaea to defend from plasmids and phages. CRISPR has been found to be an advanced alternative to zinc-finger nucleases (ZFN) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN) for gene editing and regulation, as the CRISPR-Cas9 protein remains the same for various gene targets and just a short guide RNA sequence needs to be altered to redirect the site-specific cleavage. Due to its high efficiency and precision, the Cas9 protein derived from the type II CRISPR system has been found to have applications in many fields of science. Although CRISPR-Cas9 allows easy genome editing and has a number of benefits, we should not ignore the important ethical and biosafety issues. Moreover, any tool that has great potential and offers significant capabilities carries a level of risk of being used for non-legal purposes. In this review, we present a brief history and mechanism of the CRISPR-Cas9 system. We also describe on the applications of this technology in gene regulation and genome editing; the treatment of cancer and other diseases; and limitations and concerns of the use of CRISPR-Cas9.


Subject(s)
CRISPR-Cas Systems , Gene Editing/methods , Animals , Epigenesis, Genetic , Gene Editing/ethics , Gene Editing/standards , Genetic Therapy/ethics , Genetic Therapy/methods , Genetic Therapy/standards , Humans
16.
Genetics ; 216(4): 947-956, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33060138

ABSTRACT

A lack of appropriate molecular tools is one obstacle that prevents in-depth mechanistic studies in many organisms. Transgenesis, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated engineering, and related tools are fundamental in the modern life sciences, but their applications are still limited to a few model organisms. In the phylum Nematoda, transgenesis can only be performed in a handful of species other than Caenorhabditis elegans, and additionally, other species suffer from significantly lower transgenesis efficiencies. We hypothesized that this may in part be due to incompatibilities of transgenes in the recipient organisms. Therefore, we investigated the genomic features of 10 nematode species from three of the major clades representing all different lifestyles. We found that these species show drastically different codon usage bias and intron composition. With these findings, we used the species Pristionchus pacificus as a proof of concept for codon optimization and native intron addition. Indeed, we were able to significantly improve transgenesis efficiency, a principle that may be usable in other nematode species. In addition, with the improved transgenes, we developed a fluorescent co-injection marker in P. pacificus for the detection of CRISPR-edited individuals, which helps considerably to reduce associated time and costs.


Subject(s)
CRISPR-Cas Systems , Codon Usage , Gene Editing/methods , Rhabditida/genetics , Transgenes , Animals , Gene Editing/standards , Introns
17.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 18229, 2020 10 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33106580

ABSTRACT

A major limitation hindering the widespread use of synthetic phages in medical and industrial settings is the lack of an efficient phage-engineering platform. Classical T4 phage engineering and several newly proposed methods are often inefficient and time consuming and consequently, only able to produce an inconsistent range of genomic editing rates between 0.03-3%. Here, we review and present new understandings of the CRISPR/Cas9 assisted genome engineering technique that significantly improves the genomic editing rate of T4 phages. Our results indicate that crRNAs selection is a major rate limiting factor in T4 phage engineering via CRISPR/Cas9. We were able to achieve an editing rate of > 99% for multiple genes that functionalizes the phages for further applications. We envision that this improved phage-engineering platform will accelerate the fields of individualized phage therapy, biocontrol, and rapid diagnostics.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/virology , Bacteriophage T4/genetics , CRISPR-Cas Systems/genetics , Gene Editing/methods , Genetic Engineering/standards , Viral Plaque Assay/methods , Bacteria/metabolism , Bacteriophage T4/metabolism , Gene Editing/standards , Genetic Engineering/methods
19.
Trends Genet ; 36(12): 905-914, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33039248

ABSTRACT

Genome editing has powerful applications in research, healthcare, and agriculture. However, the range of possible molecular events resulting from genome editing has been underestimated and the technology remains unpredictable on, and away from, the target locus. This has considerable impact in providing a safe approach for therapeutic genome editing, agriculture, and other applications. This opinion article discusses how to anticipate and detect those editing events by a combination of assays to capture all possible genomic changes. It also discusses strategies for preventing unwanted effects, critical to appraise the benefit or risk associated with the use of the technology. Anticipating and verifying the result of genome editing are essential for the success for all applications.


Subject(s)
CRISPR-Cas Systems , Gene Editing/standards , Genome , Animals , Humans , Risk Assessment
20.
Genetics ; 216(3): 643-650, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32963112

ABSTRACT

CRISPR genome editing has revolutionized genetics in many organisms. In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, one injection into each of the two gonad arms of an adult hermaphrodite exposes hundreds of meiotic germ cells to editing mixtures, permitting the recovery of multiple indels or small precision edits from each successfully injected animal. Unfortunately, particularly for long insertions, editing efficiencies can vary widely, necessitating multiple injections, and often requiring coselection strategies. Here, we show that melting double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) donor molecules prior to injection increases the frequency of precise homology-directed repair (HDR) by several fold for longer edits. We describe troubleshooting strategies that enable consistently high editing efficiencies resulting, for example, in up to 100 independent GFP knock-ins from a single injected animal. These efficiencies make C. elegans by far the easiest metazoan to genome edit, removing barriers to the use and adoption of this facile system as a model for understanding animal biology.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Gene Editing/methods , Nucleic Acid Denaturation , Animals , DNA/chemistry , DNA/genetics , Gene Editing/standards , Recombinational DNA Repair
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...