Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 75
Filter
1.
Eur J Hum Genet ; 29(7): 1146-1157, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33981014

ABSTRACT

Recall by genotype (RbG) studies aim to better understand the phenotypes that correspond to genetic variants of interest, by recruiting carriers of such variants for further phenotyping. RbG approaches pose major ethical and legal challenges related to the disclosure of possibly unwanted genetic information. The Cooperative Health Research in South Tyrol (CHRIS) study is a longitudinal cohort study based in South Tyrol, Italy. Demand has grown for CHRIS study participants to be enrolled in RbG studies, thus making the design of a suitable ethical framework a pressing need. We here report upon the design of a pilot RbG study conducted with CHRIS study participants. By reviewing the literature and by consulting relevant stakeholders (CHRIS participants, clinical geneticists, ethics board, GPs), we identified key ethical issues in RbG approaches (e.g. complexity of the context, communication of genetic results, measures to further protect participants). The design of the pilot was based on a feasibility assessment, the selection of a suitable test case within the ProtectMove Research Unit on reduced penetrance of hereditary movement disorders, and the development of appropriate recruitment and communication strategies. An empirical study was embedded in the pilot study with the aim of understanding participants' views on RbG. Our experience with the pilot study in CHRIS allowed us to contribute to the development of best practices and policies for RbG studies by drawing recommendations: addressing the possibility of RbG in the original consent, implementing tailored communication strategies, engaging stakeholders, designing embedded empirical studies, and sharing research experiences and methodology.


Subject(s)
Genetic Association Studies , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genotype , Phenotype , Research Design , Disclosure , Ethics, Research , Genetic Association Studies/ethics , Genetic Association Studies/methods , Genetic Association Studies/standards , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , Italy , Patient Selection , Pilot Projects , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases/genetics
2.
J Mol Diagn ; 23(3): 285-299, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33346148

ABSTRACT

Next-generation sequencing is increasingly being adopted as a valuable method for the detection of somatic variants in clinical oncology. However, it is still challenging to reach a satisfactory level of robustness and standardization in clinical practice when using the currently available bioinformatics pipelines to detect variants from raw sequencing data. Moreover, appropriate reference data sets are lacking for clinical bioinformatics pipeline development, validation, and proficiency testing. Herein, we developed the Variant Benchmark tool (VarBen), an open-source software for variant simulation to generate customized reference data sets by directly editing the original sequencing reads. VarBen can introduce a variety of variants, including single-nucleotide variants, small insertions and deletions, and large structural variants, into targeted, exome, or whole-genome sequencing data, and can handle sequencing data from both the Illumina and Ion Torrent sequencing platforms. To demonstrate the feasibility and robustness of VarBen, we performed variant simulation on different sequencing data sets and compared the simulated variants with real-world data. The validation study showed that the simulated data are highly comparable to real-world data and that VarBen is a reliable tool for variant simulation. In addition, our collaborative study of somatic variant calling in 20 laboratories emphasizes the need for laboratories to evaluate their bioinformatics pipelines with customized reference data sets. VarBen may help users develop and validate their bioinformatics pipelines using locally generated sequencing data.


Subject(s)
Computational Biology/methods , Genetic Association Studies/methods , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Variation , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Software , Computational Biology/standards , Genetic Association Studies/standards , Genome-Wide Association Study/methods , Genome-Wide Association Study/standards , Humans , INDEL Mutation , Mutation , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Reproducibility of Results
4.
J Mol Med (Berl) ; 98(10): 1447-1455, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32839827

ABSTRACT

Molecular diagnostic testing of the 11p15.5-associated imprinting disorders Silver-Russell and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (SRS, BWS) is challenging due to the broad spectrum of molecular defects and their mosaic occurrence. Additionally, the decision on the molecular testing algorithm is hindered by their clinical heterogeneity. However, the precise identification of the type of defect is often a prerequisite for the clinical management and genetic counselling. Four major molecular alterations (epimutations, uniparental disomies, copy number variants, single nucleotide variants) have been identified, but their frequencies vary between SRS and BWS. Due to their molecular aetiology, epimutations in both disorders as well as upd(11)pat in BWS are particular prone to mosaicism which might additionally complicate the interpretation of testing results. We report on our experience of molecular analysis in a total cohort of 1448 patients referred for diagnostic testing of BWS and SRS, comprising a dataset from 737 new patients and from 711 cases from a recent study. Though the majority of positively tested patients showed the expected molecular results, we identified a considerable number of clinically unexpected molecular alterations as well as not yet reported changes and discrepant mosaic distributions. Additionally, the rate of multilocus imprinting disturbances among the patients with epimutations and uniparental diploidies could be further specified. Altogether, these cases show that comprehensive testing strategies have to be applied in diagnostic testing of SRS and BWS. The precise molecular diagnosis is required as the basis for a targeted management (e.g. ECG (electrocardiogram) and tumour surveillance in BWS, growth treatment in SRS). The molecular diagnosis furthermore provides the basis for genetic counselling. However, it has to be considered that recurrence risk calculation is determined by the phenotypic consequences of each molecular alteration and mechanism by which the alteration arose. KEY MESSAGES: The detection rates for the typical molecular defects of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome or Silver-Russell syndrome (BWS, SRS) are lower in routine cohorts than in clinically well-characterised ones. A broad spectrum of (unexpected) molecular alterations in both disorders can be identified. Multilocus imprinting disturbances (MLID) are less frequent in SRS than expected. The frequency of MLID and uniparental diploidy in BWS is confirmed. Mosaicism is a diagnostic challenge in BWS and SRS. The precise determination of the molecular defects affecting is the basis for a targeted clinical management and genetic counselling.


Subject(s)
Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome/diagnosis , Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome/genetics , Genetic Association Studies/standards , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Testing/standards , Silver-Russell Syndrome/diagnosis , Silver-Russell Syndrome/genetics , Cohort Studies , Female , Genetic Association Studies/methods , Genetic Testing/methods , Genomic Imprinting , Humans , Male , Pedigree , Precision Medicine/methods , Precision Medicine/standards
5.
Br J Haematol ; 191(3): 329-339, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32394456

ABSTRACT

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) constitutes the most common inherited human bleeding disorder. It is associated with a mucocutaneous bleeding phenotype that can significantly impact upon quality of life. Despite its prevalence and associated morbidity, the diagnosis and subclassification of VWD continue to pose significant clinical challenges. This is in part attributable to the fact that plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels vary over a wide range in the normal population, together with the multiple different physiological functions played by VWF in vivo. Over recent years, substantial progress has been achieved in elucidating the biological roles of VWF. Significant advances have also been made into defining the pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning both quantitative and qualitative VWD. In particular, several new laboratory assays have been developed that enable more precise assessment of specific aspects of VWF activity. In the present review, we discuss these recent developments in the field of VWD diagnosis, and consider how these advances can impact upon clinical diagnostic algorithms for use in routine clinical practice. In addition, we review some important recent advances pertaining to the various treatment options available for managing patients with VWD.


Subject(s)
von Willebrand Diseases/diagnosis , von Willebrand Diseases/therapy , Biomarkers , Clinical Decision-Making , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Management , Disease Susceptibility , Genetic Association Studies/methods , Genetic Association Studies/standards , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genotype , Humans , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/standards , Phenotype , Treatment Outcome , von Willebrand Diseases/etiology
6.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 5070, 2020 03 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32193506

ABSTRACT

The pepper weevil, Anthonomus eugenii Cano (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is the main insect pest of peppers (Capsicum spp.) throughout the southern U.S. and a potential target for novel control methods that may require gene expression analyses. Careful selection of adequate reference genes to normalize RT-qPCR data is an important prerequisite for gene expression studies since the expression stability of reference genes can be affected by the experimental conditions leading to biased or erroneous results. The lack of studies on validation of reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis in A. eugenii limits the investigation of gene expression, therefore it is needed a systematic selection of suitable reference genes for data normalization. In the present study, three programs (BestKeeper, geNorm and NormFinder) were used to analyze the expression stability of candidate reference genes (ß-ACT, ArgK, EF1-α, GAPDH, RPL12, RPS23, α-TUB, 18S and 28S) in A. eugenii under different experimental conditions. Our results revealed that the most stably expressed reference genes in A. eugenii varied according to the experimental condition evaluated: developmental stages (EF1-α, 18S and RPL12), sex (RPS23 and RPL12), low temperature (GAPDH and α-TUB), high temperature (α-TUB and RPS23), all temperatures (α-TUB and GAPDH), starvation (RPL12 and α-TUB), and dsRNA exposure (α-TUB and RPL12). Our study provides for the first time valuable information on appropriate reference genes that can be used in the analysis of gene expression by RT-qPCR in biological experiments involving A. eugenii.


Subject(s)
Coleoptera/genetics , Coleoptera/physiology , Databases, Genetic/standards , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Gene Expression/genetics , Genes, Insect/genetics , Genetic Association Studies/standards , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Animals , Capsicum/parasitology , Coleoptera/growth & development , Starvation/genetics , Temperature
7.
Clin Transl Sci ; 13(1): 116-124, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31647186

ABSTRACT

Translating CYP2D6 genotype to metabolizer phenotype is not standardized across clinical laboratories offering pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing and PGx clinical practice guidelines, such as the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) and the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG). The genotype to phenotype translation discordance between laboratories and guidelines can cause discordant cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) phenotype assignments and, thus lead to inconsistent therapeutic recommendations and confusion among patients and clinicians. A modified-Delphi method was used to obtain consensus for a uniform system for translating CYP2D6 genotype to phenotype among a panel of international CYP2D6 experts. Experts with diverse involvement in CYP2D6 interpretation (clinicians, researchers, genetic testing laboratorians, and PGx implementers; n = 37) participated in conference calls and surveys. After completion of 7 surveys, a consensus (> 70%) was reached with 82% of the CYP2D6 experts agreeing to the final CYP2D6 genotype to phenotype translation method. Broad adoption of the proposed CYP2D6 genotype to phenotype translation method by guideline developers, such as CPIC and DPWG, and clinical laboratories as well as researchers will result in more consistent interpretation of CYP2D6 genotype.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/genetics , Genetic Association Studies/standards , Pharmacogenomic Testing/standards , Alleles , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6/metabolism , DNA Copy Number Variations , Delphi Technique , Humans , Netherlands , Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
J Mol Diagn ; 22(2): 284-293, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31837433

ABSTRACT

This multi-institutional study was undertaken to evaluate interrater reliability of the 2017 Association for Molecular Pathology/American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines for interpretation and reporting of oncology sequence variants and to assess current practices and perceptions surrounding these guidelines. Fifty-one variants were distributed to 20 participants from 10 institutions for classification using the new guidelines. Agreement was assessed using chance-corrected agreement (Cohen κ). κ was 0.35. To evaluate if data sharing could help resolve disagreements, a summary of variant classifications and additional information about each variant were distributed to all participants. κ improved to 0.7 after the original classifications were revised. Participants were invited to take a web-based survey regarding their perceptions of the guidelines. Only 20% (n = 3) of the survey respondents had prior experience with the guidelines in clinical practice. The main perceived barriers to guideline implementation included the complexity of the guidelines, discordance between clinical actionability and pathobiologic relevance, lack of familiarity with the new classifications, and uncertainty when applying criteria to potential germline variants. This study demonstrates noteworthy discordances between pathologists for variant classification in solid tumors when using the 2017 Association for Molecular Pathology/American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines. These findings highlight potential areas for clarification/refinement before mainstream clinical adoption.


Subject(s)
Genetic Association Studies , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Testing , Genetic Variation , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/genetics , Genetic Association Studies/methods , Genetic Association Studies/standards , Genetic Testing/methods , Genetic Testing/standards , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , United States
10.
JAMA Psychiatry ; 76(10): 1035-1043, 2019 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31314057

ABSTRACT

Importance: The origins and development of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) remain unresolved. No individual-level study has provided estimates of additive genetic, maternal, and environmental effects in ASD across several countries. Objective: To estimate the additive genetic, maternal, and environmental effects in ASD. Design, Setting, and Participants: Population-based, multinational cohort study including full birth cohorts of children from Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Israel, and Western Australia born between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2011, and followed up to age 16 years. Data were analyzed from September 23, 2016 through February 4, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Across 5 countries, models were fitted to estimate variance components describing the total variance in risk for ASD occurrence owing to additive genetics, maternal, and shared and nonshared environmental effects. Results: The analytic sample included 2 001 631 individuals, of whom 1 027 546 (51.3%) were male. Among the entire sample, 22 156 were diagnosed with ASD. The median (95% CI) ASD heritability was 80.8% (73.2%-85.5%) for country-specific point estimates, ranging from 50.9% (25.1%-75.6%) (Finland) to 86.8% (69.8%-100.0%) (Israel). For the Nordic countries combined, heritability estimates ranged from 81.2% (73.9%-85.3%) to 82.7% (79.1%-86.0%). Maternal effect was estimated to range from 0.4% to 1.6%. Estimates of genetic, maternal, and environmental effects for autistic disorder were similar with ASD. Conclusions and Relevance: Based on population data from 5 countries, the heritability of ASD was estimated to be approximately 80%, indicating that the variation in ASD occurrence in the population is mostly owing to inherited genetic influences, with no support for contribution from maternal effects. The results suggest possible modest differences in the sources of ASD risk between countries.


Subject(s)
Autism Spectrum Disorder/etiology , Environment , Genetic Association Studies/methods , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Inheritance Patterns/genetics , Adolescent , Autism Spectrum Disorder/epidemiology , Autism Spectrum Disorder/genetics , Autistic Disorder/epidemiology , Autistic Disorder/etiology , Child , Cohort Studies , Denmark/epidemiology , Family , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Genetic Association Studies/standards , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/epidemiology , Humans , Israel/epidemiology , Male , Maternal Inheritance/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sweden/epidemiology , Western Australia/epidemiology
12.
Eur J Hum Genet ; 27(9): 1389-1397, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31053788

ABSTRACT

Selection and prioritization of phenotype-centric variants remains a challenging part of variant analysis and interpretation in clinical exome sequencing. Phenotype-driven shortlisting of patient-specific gene lists can avoid missed diagnosis. Here, we analyzed the relevance of using primary Human Phenotype Ontology identifiers (HPO IDs) in prioritizing Mendelian disease genes across 30 in-house, 10 previously reported, and 10 recently published cases using three popular web-based gene prioritization tools (OMIMExplorer, VarElect & Phenolyzer). We assessed partial HPO-based gene prioritization using randomly chosen and top 10%, 30%, and 50% HPO IDs based on information content and found high variance within rank ratios across the former vs the latter. This signified that randomly selected less-specific HPO IDs for a given disease phenotype performed poorly by ranking probe gene farther away from the top rank. In contrast, the use of top 10%, 30%, and 50% HPO IDs individually could rank the probe gene among the top 1% in the ranked list of genes that was equivalent to the results when the full list of HPO IDs were used. Hence, we conclude that use of just the top 10% of HPO IDs chosen based on information content is sufficient for ranking the probe gene at top position. Our findings provide practical guidance for utilizing structured phenotype semantics and web-based gene-ranking tools to aid in identifying known as well unknown candidate gene associations in Mendelian disorders.


Subject(s)
Exome Sequencing , Genetic Association Studies , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Phenotype , Semantics , Genetic Association Studies/methods , Genetic Association Studies/standards , Humans , ROC Curve
13.
Genet Epidemiol ; 43(4): 365-372, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30623491

ABSTRACT

Whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) studies are underway to investigate the impact of genetic variants on complex diseases and traits. It is customary to perform single-variant association tests for common variants and region-based association tests for rare variants. The latter may target variants with similar or opposite effects, interrogate variants with different frequencies or different functional annotations, and examine a variety of regions. The large number of tests that are performed necessitates adjustment for multiple testing. The conventional Bonferroni correction is overly conservative as the test statistics are correlated. To address this challenge, we propose a simple and accurate method based on parametric bootstrap to assess genomewide significance. We show that the correlations of the test statistics are determined primarily by the genotypes, such that the same significance threshold can be used in different studies that share a common sequencing platform. We demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed method with WES data from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Exome Sequencing Project and WGS data from the 1000 Genomes Project. We recommend the p value of 5×10-9 as the genomewide significance threshold for testing all common and low-frequency variants (MAFs ≥ 0.1%) in the human genome.


Subject(s)
Genetic Association Studies , Genome, Human/genetics , Whole Genome Sequencing , Exome , Genetic Association Studies/methods , Genetic Association Studies/standards , Genetic Association Studies/statistics & numerical data , Genotype , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/standards , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Phenotype , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Reproducibility of Results , Whole Genome Sequencing/methods , Whole Genome Sequencing/statistics & numerical data
14.
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes ; 26(1): 54-59, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30507699

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As the pace of genetic discovery accelerates, genetic sequencing is increasingly applied to rare disease such as DSD (differences or disorders of sex development,) which has led to an increase in the number of novel variant-containing candidate genes identified. In this review, we will discuss several candidate genes which have recently been proposed as causative of DSD, as well as novel work in understanding gene regulation in the mouse gonad that may have implications for the DSD phenotype in humans. RECENT FINDINGS: We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed through August 2018 to identify relevant peer-reviewed publications from 2017 to 2018 on DSD genetics. SUMMARY: Seminal work has identified a critical gonadal enhancer of Sox9 in a mouse model. This enhancer is located in a region which had previously been implicated in both XX and XY DSD, though the specific enhancer and its role in Sox9 gene expression had not been defined. Novel candidate genes in XY gonadal dysgenesis (SOX8, ESR2) and XX ovotesticular DSD (NR2F2) have been described.


Subject(s)
Disorders of Sex Development/genetics , Genetic Association Studies/methods , Genetic Testing/methods , Animals , Disorders of Sex Development/diagnosis , Female , Genetic Association Studies/standards , Genetic Testing/standards , Humans , Male , Mice , Phenotype , Professional Practice/standards , SOX9 Transcription Factor/genetics
15.
J Med Genet ; 55(11): 735-743, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30061371

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Copy number variation (CNV) analysis is an integral component of the study of human genomes in both research and clinical settings. Array-based CNV analysis is the current first-tier approach in clinical cytogenetics. Decreasing costs in high-throughput sequencing and cloud computing have opened doors for the development of sequencing-based CNV analysis pipelines with fast turnaround times. We carry out a systematic and quantitative comparative analysis for several low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (WGS) strategies to detect CNV in the human genome. METHODS: We compared the CNV detection capabilities of WGS strategies (short insert, 3 kb insert mate pair and 5 kb insert mate pair) each at 1×, 3× and 5× coverages relative to each other and to 17 currently used high-density oligonucleotide arrays. For benchmarking, we used a set of gold standard (GS) CNVs generated for the 1000 Genomes Project CEU subject NA12878. RESULTS: Overall, low-coverage WGS strategies detect drastically more GS CNVs compared with arrays and are accompanied with smaller percentages of CNV calls without validation. Furthermore, we show that WGS (at ≥1× coverage) is able to detect all seven GS deletion CNVs >100 kb in NA12878, whereas only one is detected by most arrays. Lastly, we show that the much larger 15 Mbp Cri du chat deletion can be readily detected with short-insert paired-end WGS at even just 1× coverage. CONCLUSIONS: CNV analysis using low-coverage WGS is efficient and outperforms the array-based analysis that is currently used for clinical cytogenetics.


Subject(s)
Comparative Genomic Hybridization , DNA Copy Number Variations , Genome, Human , Genomics , Whole Genome Sequencing , Comparative Genomic Hybridization/methods , Comparative Genomic Hybridization/standards , Genetic Association Studies/methods , Genetic Association Studies/standards , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Testing , Genomics/methods , Genomics/standards , Humans , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
16.
Genet Med ; 20(3): 313-319, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29593351

ABSTRACT

PurposeClinical genome sequencing produces uncertain diagnostic results, raising concerns about how to communicate the method's inherent complexities in ways that reduce potential misunderstandings and harm. This study investigates clinicians' communications and patient/participant responses to uncertain diagnostic results arising from a clinical exome sequencing research study, contributing empirical data to the debate surrounding disclosure of uncertain genomic information.MethodsWe investigated the communication and impact of uncertain diagnostic results using ethnographic observations of result disclosures with 21 adults and 11 parents of child patients, followed by two semistructured interviews with these same participants.ResultsParticipants understood their uncertain results in ways that were congruent with clinical geneticists' communications. They followed recommendations for further consultation, although family testing to resolve uncertainty was not always done. Participants were prepared for learning an uncertain result and grasped the key concept that it should not be used to guide health-care or other decisions. They did not express regret for having learned the uncertain result; most regarded it as potentially valuable in the future.ConclusionThis study suggests that uncertain diagnostic results from genome sequencing can be relayed to patients in ways they can understand and consistent with providers' interpretations, without causing undue harm.


Subject(s)
Data Accuracy , Genetic Association Studies/standards , Uncertainty , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Communication , Exome , Female , Genetic Association Studies/methods , Genetic Counseling , Genetic Testing/standards , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Participation , Referral and Consultation , Exome Sequencing , Young Adult
18.
Genet Med ; 20(3): 337-345, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28771245

ABSTRACT

PurposeAs genome science advances, people receiving personalized genetic information may receive reinterpretations of pathogenicity. Little is known about responses to adjusted results. We examined how reinterpretations might affect attitudes about genetic testing and intentions to share results with family.MethodsData were collected from high-socioeconomic-status participants (n = 58) in a genome sequencing study. Twenty-nine originally learned they were carriers of Duarte variant galactosemia, based on a variant that was reclassified as benign. Positive testers (n = 19) had a newly identified causative variant and remained carriers. Negative testers (n = 10) learned they were no longer carriers. Twenty-nine controls were carriers for a disease of comparable severity with no reclassification. Participants completed baseline, immediate, and 3-month follow-up surveys.ResultsApproximately 80% of participants demonstrated complete or partially accurate recall of their results and reported positive or neutral reactions to their result and about genetic information more generally. Positive testers reported lower intentions to share the change in their result with family. Controls reported the lowest intentions to learn future results. There were no significant group differences or changes over time in perceived ambiguity or negative emotions.ConclusionThe results suggest that high-socioeconomic-status participants understand reinterpretations conferring a neutral change or a change from carrier to noncarrier status. Participants' responses to changes in carrier results for a low-risk condition indicated minimal adverse effects.


Subject(s)
Genetic Association Studies , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Testing , Genetic Variation , Patient Participation , Case-Control Studies , Data Accuracy , Emotions , Follow-Up Studies , Genetic Association Studies/methods , Genetic Association Studies/standards , Genetic Counseling , Genetic Testing/methods , Genetic Testing/standards , Humans , Intention , Perception , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
Genet Med ; 20(4): 435-443, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28771251

ABSTRACT

PurposeGenetic testing is an integral diagnostic component of pediatric medicine. Standard of care is often a time-consuming stepwise approach involving chromosomal microarray analysis and targeted gene sequencing panels, which can be costly and inconclusive. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides a comprehensive testing platform that has the potential to streamline genetic assessments, but there are limited comparative data to guide its clinical use.MethodsWe prospectively recruited 103 patients from pediatric non-genetic subspecialty clinics, each with a clinical phenotype suggestive of an underlying genetic disorder, and compared the diagnostic yield and coverage of WGS with those of conventional genetic testing.ResultsWGS identified diagnostic variants in 41% of individuals, representing a significant increase over conventional testing results (24%; P = 0.01). Genes clinically sequenced in the cohort (n = 1,226) were well covered by WGS, with a median exonic coverage of 40 × ±8 × (mean ±SD). All the molecular diagnoses made by conventional methods were captured by WGS. The 18 new diagnoses made with WGS included structural and non-exonic sequence variants not detectable with whole-exome sequencing, and confirmed recent disease associations with the genes PIGG, RNU4ATAC, TRIO, and UNC13A.ConclusionWGS as a primary clinical test provided a higher diagnostic yield than conventional genetic testing in a clinically heterogeneous cohort.


Subject(s)
Genetic Association Studies , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/diagnosis , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Testing , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Whole Genome Sequencing , Computational Biology/methods , DNA Copy Number Variations , Exome , Female , Genetic Association Studies/methods , Genetic Association Studies/standards , Genetic Testing/methods , Genetic Testing/standards , Genetic Variation , Humans , Male , Molecular Sequence Annotation , Phenotype , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Sequence Analysis, DNA/standards , Exome Sequencing/methods , Exome Sequencing/standards , Whole Genome Sequencing/methods , Whole Genome Sequencing/standards
20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29212833

ABSTRACT

Next-generation sequencing (NGS), also known as massively parallel sequencing, is rapidly being incorporated into oncology practice. Interpretation of genomic reports and selecting treatments based on the tumor's genomic analysis becomes more and more complicated for the treating oncologist because of the use of larger panels covering dozens to hundreds of genes and the amount of rapidly emerging clinical/translational data. To help guide personalized treatments in oncology, The Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy (IPCT) at MD Anderson Cancer Center has developed a knowledge base, available at https://personalizedcancertherapy.org or https://pct.mdanderson.org (PCT). This knowledge base provides information on the function of common genomic alterations and their therapeutic implications. Here, we describe how such genomic information can be used by health-care providers to identify genomically matched therapies.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/therapy , Precision Medicine , Animals , Clinical Decision-Making , Clinical Trials as Topic , Disease Management , Drug Discovery , Drugs, Investigational/pharmacology , Drugs, Investigational/therapeutic use , Genetic Association Studies/methods , Genetic Association Studies/standards , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Testing , Genomics/methods , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Knowledge Bases , Medical Oncology/methods , Medical Oncology/standards , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/etiology , Precision Medicine/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...