Understanding the Effect of Osteoarthritis on Surgical Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Among Patients With Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) may be misdiagnosed as osteoarthritis (OA), or the chronic course of TGCT may lead to development of secondary OA. However, little is known about the effect of comorbid OA on long-term surgical patterns and costs among TGCT patients. METHODS: This cohort study used claims data from the Merative MarketScan Research Databases. The study included adults diagnosed with TGCT from January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2019, who have at least 3 years of continuous enrollment before and after the first TGCT diagnosis (date of the first TGCT diagnosis = index date) and no other cancer diagnosis during the study period. Patients were stratified by the presence of an OA diagnosis relative to the index date. Outcomes included surgical procedure patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in the 3-year pre- and postindex periods. Multivariable models were used to assess the effect of OA on the study outcomes, controlling for baseline characteristics. RESULTS: The study included 2856 TGCT patients: 1153 (40%) had no OA before or after index (OA[-/-]), 207 (7%) had OA before index but not after (OA[+/-]), 644 (23%) had OA after index but not before (OA[-/+]), and 852 (30%) had OA before and after index (OA[+/+]). The mean age was 51.6 years, and 61.7% were female. During the postperiod, joint surgery was more common among OA(-/+) and OA(+/+) patients compared with OA(-/-) and OA(+/-) patients (55.7% vs 33.2%). The mean all-cause total costs in the 3-year postperiod were $19,476 per patient per year. Compared with OA(-/-) patients, OA(-/+) and OA(+/+) patients had a higher risk of undergoing recurrent surgery and higher total healthcare costs postindex. DISCUSSION: Higher rates of surgery and increased healthcare cost observed in TGCT patients with postindex OA underscore the need for effective treatment options to reduce joint damage, especially among patients with comorbid OA.

Effectiveness of arthroscopic excision based on the distribution of the tenosynovial giant cell tumor around knee joint.

BACKGROUND: The mainstay treatment for tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is open excision. However, open excision is associated with the risk of stiffness, infection, neurovascular injury, and prolonged hospital stay and rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopic excision of tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) of the knee joint, including the diffuse type of TGCT. METHODS: Patients who underwent arthroscopic excision of TGCT between April 2014 and November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. TGCT lesions were divided into 12 distributions (nine intra- and three extra-articular lesions). The distribution of TGCT lesions, portals used, degree of excision, recurrence, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were evaluated. The prevalence of intra-articular lesions in diffuse TGCT was also analyzed to validate the existence of a connection between intra- and extra-articular lesions. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included in the study. Fifteen patients (52%) had localized TGCT, and 14 patients (48%) had diffuse TGCT. The recurrence rates for localized, and diffuse TGCT were 0%, and 7%, respectively. Intra-articular posteromedial (i-PM), intra-articular posterolateral (i-PL), and extra-articular posterolateral (e-PL) lesions were found in all patients with diffuse TGCT. The prevalence rates of i-PM and i-PL lesions among e-PL lesions were both 100% (p = 0.026 and p < 0.001, respectively). Diffuse TGCT lesions were managed with posterolateral capsulotomy and viewed from the trans-septal portal. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic excision of TGCT was effective in both localized and diffuse TGCT. However, diffuse TGCT was associated with posterior and extra-articular lesions. Therefore, technical modification such as posterior, trans-septal portal, and capsulotomy were required. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series; level Ⅳ.

Benign Hand Tumors (Part II): Soft Tissue Tumors.

Background: Benign soft-tissue tumors of the hand are more common than both their benign bone and malignant soft-tissue counterparts. This study evaluates the characteristics and treatment of benign soft tissue tumors in light of 1 institution's experience. Methods: Histologically confirmed benign soft-tissue tumors of the hand were retrospectively identified using International Classification of Disease codes from 1992 to 2015. A medical chart review was conducted to collect patient demographics, tumor epidemiology, and treatment. Results: A total of 199 soft-tissue tumors were identified. The median patient age at time of treatment was 47.4 ± 14.7 years in age. The majority of tumors were located in the digits (n = 168, 84%) and treated by excision (n = 191, 96%). Localized type tenosynovial giant cell tumors (n = 71, 36%) were the most common and had the highest rates of recurrence (8.5%) in this series. Other frequent histologies included hemangioma, schwannoma, and glomus tumors. Conclusion: Awareness and understanding of tumor characteristics may help physicians with diagnosis and treatment. There is an extensive variety of tumors, but the principles of clinical and imaging diagnosis are common to all of them. Marginal excision for the treatment pain, improvement of function, and cosmetic correction applies to all these tumors independent of the histology.

Arthroscopic Versus Open Management of Diffuse-Type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor of the Knee: A Meta-analysis of Retrospective Cohort Studies.

BACKGROUND: Whether arthroscopic or open surgical management for diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (D-TGCT) of the knee is associated with a lower rate of recurrence is unknown. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and EMBASE were searched on December 3, 2020. Retrospective studies that reported on recurrence rates for arthroscopic versus open management of D-TGCT were included. A total of 16 studies evaluating 1143 patients with D-TGCT of the knee were included (nopen = 551, narthroscopic = 350 patients, and narthroscopic/open = 23 patients). Random-effects meta-analyses were used to summarize and compare the reported recurrence rates, stratified by approach and overall recurrence. The meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO. RESULTS: The recurrence rate per year (incidence) for arthroscopic procedures was 0.11 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.16, P < 0.0001) and for open procedures was 0.07 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.13, P < 0.0001). There was a 1.56 times (95% CI 1.04 to 2.34, P = 0.0332) increased risk of recurrence when treating D-TGCT of the knee with an arthroscopic approach. When evaluating only the subset of studies that had data for both arthroscopic and open approaches, the incidence rate per year for arthroscopic procedures was 0.17 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.27, P < 0.0001) and for open procedures was 0.11 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.19, P < 0.0001). The rate of overall complications was 0.04 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.08, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic surgical management of D-TGCT of the knee in our study resulted in a 1.56 times risk of recurrence as compared with the open approach. The percent of overall complications was minimal.

Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor in the Hand: Experience with 173 Cases.

Background: Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TSGCT) is the second most common benign tumor of the hand. Even though it is a benign lesion there is still a high incidence of local recurrence (range, 7%-44%) according to data in published papers. In this study, the clinical and epidemiological features of 173 patients who underwent excision of localized TSGCT, the recurrence rates and possible reasons for recurrence were examined in the light of current literature. Methods: Medical records of 173 patients with TSGCT were reviewed. Data on demographic characteristics as well as clinical and intraoperative findings were collected. Patients were asked about the recurrence of the TSGCT and the QuickDASH scoring was applied at the final clinical evaluation after mean follow-up of 81 months. Results: Females were predominantly involved (73%). Patients aged mean 44 years at the time of surgery. There were 93 tumors in flexor zones and 80 tumors in extensor zones of the hand. Of the tumors with flexor zone localization, zone II was most predominantly involved with 46 tumors, and 18 of these were on the index finger. The extensor zones III and IV were mostly involved with 9 tumors each on the middle and ring fingers. A total of 12 recurrences (6.9 %) were determined over the mean follow-up period of 81 months. Conclusions: The characteristics of our patients identified were similar to the previous studies. Surgical excision provides good outcomes in the treatment of TSGCT especially when clear margins are obtained.

Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors in Children: A Similar Entity Compared With Adults.

BACKGROUND: Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a rare, benign, monoarticular entity. Many case-series in adults are described, whereas TGCT is only incidentally reported in children. Therefore, its incidence rate and natural history in children are unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How many cases have been reported of this condition, and what were their characteristics? (2) What is the standardized pediatric incidence rate for TGCT? (3) Is there a clinical difference in TGCT between children and adults? (4) What is the risk of recurrence after open resection in children compared with adults? METHODS: Data were derived from three sources: (1) a systematic review on TGCT in children, seeking sources published between 1990 and 2016, included 17 heterogeneous, small case-series; (2) the nationwide TGCT incidence study: the Dutch pediatric incidence rate was extracted from this nationwide study by including patients younger than 18 years of age. This registry-based study, in which eligible patients with TGCT were clinically verified, calculated Dutch incidence rates for localized and diffuse-type TGCT in a 5-year timeframe. Standardized pediatric incidence rates were obtained by using the direct method; (3) from our nationwide bone and soft tissue tumor data registry, a clinical data set was derived. Fifty-seven children with histologically proven TGCT of large joints, diagnosed and treated between 1995 and 2015, in all four tertiary sarcoma centers in The Netherlands, were included. These clinically collected data were compared with a retrospective database of 423 adults with TGCT. Chi-square test and independent t-test were used to compare children and adults for TGCT type, sex, localization, symptoms before diagnosis, first treatment, recurrent disease, followup status, duration of symptoms, and time to followup. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate recurrence-free survival at 2.5 years. RESULTS: TGCT is seldom reported because only 76 pediatric patients (39 female), 29 localized, 38 diffuse, and nine unknown type, were identified from our systematic review. The standardized pediatric TGCT incidence rate of large joints was 2.42 and 1.09 per million person-years in localized and diffuse types, respectively. From our clinical data set, symptoms both in children and adults were swelling, pain, and limited ROM with a median time before diagnosis of 12 months (range, 1-72 months). With the numbers available, we did not observe differences in presentation between children and adults in terms of sex, symptoms before diagnosis, first treatment, recurrent disease, followup status, or median time to followup. The 2.5-year recurrence-free TGCT survival rate after open resection was not different with the numbers available between children and adults: 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67%-100%) versus 89% (95% CI, 83%-96%) in localized, respectively (p = 0.527) and 53% (95% CI, 35%-79%) versus 56% (95% CI, 49%-64%) in diffuse type, respectively (p = 0.691). CONCLUSIONS: Although the incidence of pediatric TGCT is low, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis in children with chronic monoarticular joint effusions. Recurrent disease after surgical treatment of this orphan disease seems comparable between children and adults. With targeted therapies being developed, future research should define the most effective treatment strategies for this heterogeneous disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Higher incidence rates than previously known in tenosynovial giant cell tumors.

Background and purpose - Tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCT) are rare, benign tumors, arising in synovial lining of joints, tendon sheaths, or bursae. 2 types are distinguished: localized, either digits or extremity, and diffuse lesions. Current TGCT incidence is based on 1 single US-county study in 1980, with an incidence of 9 and 2 per million person-years in localized (including digits) and diffuse TGCT, respectively. We aim to determine nationwide and worldwide incidence rates (IR) in TGCT affecting digits, localized-extremity TGCT and diffuse-type TGCT. Material and methods - Over a 5-year period, the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA) identified 4,503 pathology reports on TGCT. Reports affecting digits were solely used for IR calculations. Reports affecting extremities were clinically evaluated. Dutch IRs were converted to world population IRs. Results - 2,815 (68%) digits, 933 (23%) localized-extremity and 390 (9%) diffuse-type TGCT were identified. Dutch IR in digits, localized-extremity, and diffuse-type TGCT was 34, 11 and 5 per million person-years, respectively. All 3 groups showed a female predilection and highest number of new cases in age category 40-59 years. The knee joint was most often affected: localized-extremity (46%) and diffuse-type (64%) TGCT, mostly treated with open resection: localized (65%) and diffuse (49%). Reoperation rate due to local recurrence for localized-extremity was 9%, and diffuse TGCT 23%. Interpretation - This first nationwide study and detailed analyses of IRs in TGCT estimated a worldwide IR in digits, localized-extremity and diffuse TGCT of 29, 10, and 4 per million person-years, respectively. Recurrence rate in diffuse type is 2.6 times higher, compared with localized extremity. TGCT is still considered a rare disease; however, it is more common than previously understood.

Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor: Incidence, Prevalence, Patient Characteristics, and Recurrence. A Registry-based Cohort Study in Denmark.

OBJECTIVE: Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a rare benign proliferative and inflammatory disease arising from synovia of joints, bursae, or tendon sheaths. We aimed to estimate incidence rate and prevalence of TGCT in Denmark, to describe patient characteristics and treatment modalities among patients with TGCT, and to estimate risk of TGCT recurrence. METHODS: Using registry data on pathology examinations and inpatient and outpatient hospital diagnoses, we identified adult patients with diagnoses of diffuse TGCT (D-TGCT) or localized TGCT (L-TGCT) between 1997 and 2012, followed through 2012. We described patients' characteristics, treatment modalities, and recurrence. RESULTS: We identified 2087 patients with L-TGCT and 574 patients with D-TGCT. Their incidence rates per million person-years were 30.3 (95% CI 29.1-31.7) and 8.4 (95% CI 7.7-9.1), respectively. At the end of 2012, prevalence per 100,000 persons was 44.3 (95% CI 42.4-46.3) for L-TGCT and 11.5 (95% CI 10.6-12.6) for D-TGCT. Women made up 61% of the patients with L-TGCT and 51% of the patients with D-TGCT. Median age at diagnosis was 47 years. Ten-year risk of recurrence was 9.8% (95% CI 8.4-11.3%) after L-TGCT and 19.1% (95% CI 15.7-22.7%) after D-TGCT. CONCLUSION: This study contributes evidence about epidemiology of TGCT based on routinely collected population-based data gathered in a setting of universal equal access to healthcare and complete followup.