Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
Arq Bras Oftalmol ; 87(3): e20230257, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38716966

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This review emphasizes the effect of light on visual efficiency, the impact of different lighting focuses, types of lighting, and their influence on vision and productivity. Light sources and standards are intriguing subjects for ophthalmologists. Guidelines regarding the level of lighting influence on visual activities can enhance visual performance.Methods: This article was developed based on literature reviews, with a bibliographic survey conducted in databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS, and SciELO. RESULTS: Provides recommendations for understanding information regarding the influence of lighting on visual performance. CONCLUSION: Proper workplace lighting is crucial for improving visual efficiency, safety, productivity, and worker health. Efficient workplace lighting should avoid light sources directed towards the worker's face, prevent harmful glare, be more intense in the work area, and uniform in the rest of the room. Ophthalmologists should be knowledgeable about and provide guidance on correct lighting to ensure patient comfort and satisfaction with visual correction.


Subject(s)
Lighting , Humans , Vision, Ocular/physiology , Visual Acuity/physiology , Workplace , Occupational Health , Glare , Light
2.
Arq. bras. oftalmol ; Arq. bras. oftalmol;76(6): 386-390, nov.-dez. 2013. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-701295

ABSTRACT

Visual acuity is the measurement of an individual's ability to recognize details of an object in a space. Visual function measurements in clinical ophthalmology are limited by factors such as maximum contrast and so it might not adequately reflect the real vision conditions at that moment as well as the subjective aspects of the world perception by the patient. The objective of a successful vision-restoring surgery lies not only in gaining visual acuity lines, but also in vision quality. Therefore, refractive and cataract surgeries have the responsibility of achieving quality results. It is difficult to define quality of vision by a single parameter, and the main functional-vision tests are: contrast sensitivity, disability glare, intraocular stray light and aberrometry. In the current review the different components of the visual function are explained and the several available methods to assess the vision quality are described.


Qualidade Visual é a medida da capacidade individual de reconhecer detalhes de um objeto no espaço. Medições de função visual na clínica oftalmológica são limitadas por vários fatores, tal como máximo contraste e assim podem não refletir adequadamente as condições visuais reais, bem como os aspectos subjetivos da percepção do mundo pelo paciente. O sucesso em uma cirurgia está não apenas em restaurar linhas de visão, mas sim qualidade visual. Portanto, as cirurgias refrativas e de catarata têm a responsabilidade de alcançar resultados de qualidade. É difícil definir qualidade visual por um único parâmetro, sendo os principais testes de função visual: sensibilidade ao contraste; glare; dispersão intraocular da luz e aberrometria. Nesta revisão os diferentes componentes da função visual são explicados e os diversos métodos disponíveis para se avaliar a qualidade de visão são descritos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Cataract Extraction/rehabilitation , Vision Tests/methods , Vision, Ocular/physiology , Visual Acuity/physiology , Aberrometry , Glare , Treatment Outcome
3.
Arq Bras Oftalmol ; 76(6): 386-90, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24510091

ABSTRACT

Visual acuity is the measurement of an individual's ability to recognize details of an object in a space. Visual function measurements in clinical ophthalmology are limited by factors such as maximum contrast and so it might not adequately reflect the real vision conditions at that moment as well as the subjective aspects of the world perception by the patient. The objective of a successful vision-restoring surgery lies not only in gaining visual acuity lines, but also in vision quality. Therefore, refractive and cataract surgeries have the responsibility of achieving quality results. It is difficult to define quality of vision by a single parameter, and the main functional-vision tests are: contrast sensitivity, disability glare, intraocular stray light and aberrometry. In the current review the different components of the visual function are explained and the several available methods to assess the vision quality are described.


Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction/rehabilitation , Vision Tests/methods , Vision, Ocular/physiology , Visual Acuity/physiology , Aberrometry , Glare , Humans , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Refract Surg ; 26(8): 588-93, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19810663

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare intraocular straylight measurements and contrast sensitivity after wavefront-guided LASIK (WFG LASIK) in one eye and wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (WFG PRK) in the fellow eye for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction. METHODS: A prospective, randomized study of 22 eyes of 11 patients who underwent simultaneous WFG LASIK and WFG PRK (contralateral eye). Both groups were treated with the NIDEK Advanced Vision Excimer Laser System, and a microkeratome was used for flap creation in the WFG LASIK group. High and low contrast visual acuity, wavefront analysis, contrast sensitivity, and retinal straylight measurements were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. A third-generation straylight meter, C-Quant (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH), was used for measuring intraocular straylight. RESULTS: Twelve months postoperatively, mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was -0.06 +/- 0.07 logMAR in the WFG LASIK group and -0.10 +/- 0.10 logMAR in the WFG PRK group. Mean preoperative intraocular straylight was 0.94 +/- 0.12 logs for the WFG LASIK group and 0.96 +/- 0.11 logs for the WFG PRK group. After 12 months, the mean straylight value was 1.01 +/- 0.1 log s for the WFG LASIK group and 0.97 +/- 0.12 log s for the WFG PRK group. No difference was found between techniques after 12 months (P = .306). No significant difference in photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity between groups was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Intraocular straylight showed no statistically significant increase 1 year after WFG LASIK and WFG PRK. Higher order aberrations increased significantly after surgery for both groups. Nevertheless, WFG LASIK and WFG PRK yielded excellent visual acuity and contrast sensitivity performance without significant differences between techniques.


Subject(s)
Contrast Sensitivity/physiology , Glare , Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ/methods , Myopia/surgery , Photorefractive Keratectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications , Scattering, Radiation , Adult , Humans , Lasers, Excimer/therapeutic use , Light , Prospective Studies , Visual Acuity/physiology
6.
Arq. bras. oftalmol ; Arq. bras. oftalmol;71(6): 841-846, nov.-dez. 2008. graf, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-503451

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a qualidade visual após retratamento personalizado e retratamento convencional em olhos submetidos a LASIK primário convencional. MÉTODOS: Foi realizado estudo prospectivo de 74 olhos submetidos ao retratamento de LASIK para correção de miopia e astigmatismo. Cada paciente foi submetido ao retratamento de LASIK com ablação personalizada (Zyoptix, Bausch & Lomb) em um olho e ablação convencional (Planoscan, Bausch & Lomb) no olho contralateral. Foram comparados os resultados do teste de ofuscamento e da sensibilidade ao contraste durante o acompanhamento de seis meses. RESULTADOS: Os olhos do grupo Zyoptix apresentaram melhores resultados no teste de ofuscamento e na sensibilidade ao contraste do que o olho contralateral, quando se compararam os resultados. CONCLUSÕES: O retratamento personalizado resultou em melhor qualidade visual pós-operatória do que o retratamento convencional de LASIK primário convencional.


PURPOSE: To evaluate visual quality after wavefront-guided LASIK versus standard LASIK in retreatment of primary LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism. METHODS: A prospective study was performed with paired eye control of 74 eyes with LASIK retreatment. Each patient underwent retreatment using custom ablation (Zyoptix, Bausch & Lomb) in 1 eye and standard ablation LASIK (PlanoScan, Bausch & Lomb) in the contralateral eye. A complete ophthalmologic examination was performed, including evaluation of glare test and contrast sensitivity test, with a follow-up of 6 months. RESULTS: Zyoptix eyes showed better results of glare test and contrast sensitivity test than the contralateral eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront-guided LASIK produces better visual quality than standard LASIK in the retreatment of refractive errors after primary LASIK.


Subject(s)
Humans , Astigmatism/surgery , Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ/methods , Myopia/surgery , Visual Acuity/physiology , Astigmatism/physiopathology , Contrast Sensitivity/physiology , Follow-Up Studies , Glare , Myopia/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Retreatment , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome
7.
Arq Bras Oftalmol ; 71(6): 841-6, 2008.
Article in Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19169518

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate visual quality after wavefront-guided LASIK versus standard LASIK in retreatment of primary LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism. METHODS: A prospective study was performed with paired eye control of 74 eyes with LASIK retreatment. Each patient underwent retreatment using custom ablation (Zyoptix, Bausch & Lomb) in 1 eye and standard ablation LASIK (PlanoScan, Bausch & Lomb) in the contralateral eye. A complete ophthalmologic examination was performed, including evaluation of glare test and contrast sensitivity test, with a follow-up of 6 months. RESULTS: Zyoptix eyes showed better results of glare test and contrast sensitivity test than the contralateral eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront-guided LASIK produces better visual quality than standard LASIK in the retreatment of refractive errors after primary LASIK.


Subject(s)
Astigmatism/surgery , Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ/methods , Myopia/surgery , Visual Acuity/physiology , Astigmatism/physiopathology , Contrast Sensitivity/physiology , Follow-Up Studies , Glare , Humans , Myopia/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Retreatment , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome
8.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 142(5): 750-6, 2006 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17056359

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare visual performance, total and high order wavefront aberrations (coma, spherical aberration, and other terms), and contrast sensitivity in 120 eyes implanted with one monofocal aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) and two spherical IOLs. DESIGN: Randomized prospective study. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomized to receive three IOL types: Alcon AcrySofIQ (40 eyes), AcrySofNatural (40 eyes), and advanced medical optic (AMO)Sensar (40 eyes). Complete ophthalmologic examination including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), corneal topography, and wavefront analysis were performed preoperatively, 30 days, and 90 days postoperatively. Pelli-Robson chart test and functional acuity contrast testing (FACT-Optec6500) were performed approximately 50 days after surgery. Statistical analyses were performed using analysis chi(2), analysis of variance (ANOVA), and multiple comparisons Tukey test. RESULTS: After 90 days, all eyes had postoperative BSCVA > or =20/32. The AcrySofIQ IOL showed statistically significant less induction of spherical aberration (P < .001) when compared with the AMOSensar and the AcrySofNatural IOLs. The AMOSensar presented significantly less spherical aberration then the AcrySofNatural (P < .05). The AcrySofIQ also had lower values of total and high-order aberration (HOA) (P < .05) when compared with the AMOSensar and the AcrySofNatural. The mean values of trefoil 9, coma, and HOA root mean square (RMS) decreased between one and three months (P < .001, P < .001, P = .023, P < .001, respectively) in all groups. Mean Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity values in photopic condition were similar between the groups. The AcrySofIQ showed better results in 3cpd spatial frequency in mesopic condition using FACT-Optec 6500 (P = .008), although there were no statistical differences in photopic and mesopic with glare conditions.


Subject(s)
Contrast Sensitivity/physiology , Corneal Topography , Lens Implantation, Intraocular , Lenses, Intraocular , Phacoemulsification , Pseudophakia/physiopathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Glare , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Pupil/physiology , Visual Acuity/physiology
9.
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis ; 23(2): 233-8, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16477827

ABSTRACT

It was shown that a peripheral glare source reduces the brightness of a foveal stimulus. We hypothesized that this brightness reduction is governed by an inhibitory effect of the glare source on the test. We reported the results of an investigation of the dynamic of brightness reduction of an incremental stimulus immediately after the onset of a glare source in the field of view. A magnitude comparison paradigm using constant stimuli was adopted to determine the luminance that appeared equal in brightness to the standard patch. The luminance of the standard stimulus was in the mesopic range (0.5 cd/m2), and the levels of glare were 15 and 60 lx. Results showed that the time course of brightness reduction followed the typical shape attributed to the Broca-Sulzer effect. Data were fitted with a model that first considers the response of a peripheral ganglion cell to glare and then its inhibitory effect on the test signals. We discussed the plausibility of a postretinal stage of processing.


Subject(s)
Contrast Sensitivity/physiology , Fovea Centralis/physiology , Glare , Lighting , Models, Neurological , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Retinal Ganglion Cells/physiology , Adult , Computer Simulation , Female , Fovea Centralis/radiation effects , Humans , Light , Male , Photic Stimulation/methods , Retinal Ganglion Cells/radiation effects , Sensory Thresholds/physiology , Time Factors
10.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 30(8): 1732-5, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15313299

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of trypan blue staining of expandable hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) on contrast sensitivity and glare. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University, and Oculistas Associados, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. METHODS: Phacoemulsification with expandable hydrophilic IOL implantation was performed in 19 eyes. Group 1 (stained group) consisted of 12 eyes with the IOL unintentionally stained by trypan blue 0.1% solution during surgery; Group 2 (unstained group) consisted of 7 eyes with IOLs that were not stained because trypan blue was not used during surgery. The eyes were examined postoperatively for Snellen best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity BCVA, and glare vision. The examiners were masked to whether the IOL was stained by trypan blue. Inclusion criteria included a BCVA of 20/30 or better 1 month postoperatively. Patients who had other ocular pathology or previous ocular surgery were excluded from the study. RESULTS: The mean postoperative BCVA was 20/24 in the stained group and 20/23 in the unstained group (P =.73). The mean contrast sensitivity visual acuity was 20/31 in the stained group and 20/26 in unstained group (P =.10). The mean glare visual acuity was 20/75 and 20/33, respectively (P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with expandable hydrophilic acrylic IOLs stained with trypan blue performed significantly worse on a glare vision test than patients whose IOLs were not stained. Cataract surgeons should avoid using trypan blue with this IOL type.


Subject(s)
Coloring Agents/adverse effects , Contrast Sensitivity/physiology , Glare , Lenses, Intraocular , Prosthesis Failure , Trypan Blue/adverse effects , Acrylic Resins , Aged , Female , Humans , Lens Implantation, Intraocular , Male , Middle Aged , Phacoemulsification , Staining and Labeling/methods , Visual Acuity/physiology
11.
Arq. bras. oftalmol ; Arq. bras. oftalmol;66(3): 293-297, maio-jun. 2003.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-345633

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a função visual pela eletrorretinografia de campo total e pela acuidade visual em pacientes com distrofia de cones. MÉTODOS: Um grupo de 23 pacientes (16 do sexo feminino e 7 do sexo masculino) com distrofia de cones foi avaliado no Laboratório de Eletrofisiologia Visual Clínica do Departamento de Oftalmologia da Universidade Federal de São Paulo. A avaliação constou de: sinais e sintomas, acuidade visual medida pela tabela ETDRS ou de Snellen e função retiniana pela eletrorretinografia de campo total. As amplitudes pico-a-pico (µV) e o tempo de culminação da onda-b (ms) foram comparadas com normas descritas na literatura. RESULTADOS: A acuidade visual no melhor olho variou de 0,07 a 3,00 logMAR (20/25-MM a 10 cm), com média de 0,85±0,64 logMAR (20/140). A média da amplitude pico-a-pico das respostas escotópicas de bastonetes foi de 144,29±80,05 µV com média do tempo de culminação da onda-b de 92,85±9,02 ms (normal para a idade). A média da amplitude pico-a-pico para respostas fotópicas de cones foi de 5,06±8,59 µV (reduzida para a idade) com média do tempo de culminação da onda-b de 43,4±14,5 ms (atrasado para a idade) nos pacientes com resposta detectável e para as respostas do flicker, a amplitude foi de 5,00±9,00 µV (reduzida para a idade) com média do tempo de culminação da onda-b de 32,90±12,87 ms (atrasado para a idade). CONCLUSÃO: A acuidade visual média encontrada neste grupo de pacientes com distrofia de cones foi de 0,85 logMAR (20/140). A fotofobia foi o sintoma mais freqüente juntamente com a baixa de visão e deficiência de visão de cores. Em 10/23 pacientes o diagnóstico foi feito pela eletrorretinografia, devido à ausência de alterações fundoscópicas.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Visual Perception/physiology , Retinitis Pigmentosa , Vision, Low/physiopathology , Color Vision Defects , Electroretinography , Glare , Color Perception/physiology , Photophobia , Visual Acuity
12.
Arq. bras. oftalmol ; Arq. bras. oftalmol;66(3): 381-384, maio-jun. 2003. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-345647

ABSTRACT

As autoras propõem a utilização de lentes de contato filtrantes coloridas para melhora da discriminação de cores e do ofuscamento, em portadores de discromatopsia, na impossibilidade de montagem de filtros coloridos em óculos. Foram adaptadas lentes de contato filtrantes coloridas em dois portadores de discromatopsias, um com deutanopia e outro com acromatopsia. No primeiro, adaptou-se lente rígida filtrante, de polimetilmetacrilato (PMMA), vermelha, no olho não dominante, com o objetivo de melhorar a discriminação de cores. No segundo, colocou-se lente filtrante gelatinosa, de uso diário, de coloração marrom escuro com pupila âmbar, visando melhorar o ofuscamento. No primeiro caso, o paciente manteve inalterada a acuidade visual e também o contraste, porém demonstrou melhora na discriminação das cores ao teste de PV-16. No segundo caso, houve melhora subjetiva acentuada do ofuscamento tanto em ambiente interno, como externo. A acuidade visual e a visão de cores permaneceram sem alterações. Os achados sugerem a possibilidade de contarmos com as lentes de contato filtrantes coloridas como importante auxílio para a melhora na discriminação de cores e ofuscamento, nas discromatopsias.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Color Vision Defects , Contact Lenses , Color Perception , Glare , Color Perception Tests/methods
13.
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers ; 33(6): 514-7, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12449232

ABSTRACT

A 17-year-old male patient was referred for poorly controlled glaucoma on maximal medication, congenital aniridia, cataract, nystagmus, and hypoplasia of the macula. A bilateral filtering procedure was performed to control the glaucoma. Three months later, a slow motion phacoemulsification and implantation of a brown diaphragm intraocular lens (IOL) was attempted. Despite the presence of nystagmus and hypoplasia of the macula, the visual acuity improved from 20/300 to 20/100 in the right eye and from 20/400 to 20/150 in the left eye. Both aniridia IOLs were well centered, the anterior segment was quiet with normal intraocular pressure without medication, and all of the patient's glare symptoms disappeared. A single-piece iris diaphragm and optical lens offer a safe alternative for patients who previously had no viable options for iris reconstruction. The most serious postoperative problem, glaucoma, should be addressed before the cataract and lens implantation is performed to avoid a possible acceleration of the glaucoma progression by the large aniridia IOL.


Subject(s)
Aniridia/surgery , Cataract Extraction/methods , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/methods , Lenses, Intraocular , Trabeculectomy/methods , Adolescent , Cataract/complications , Cataract/therapy , Glare , Glaucoma/complications , Glaucoma/surgery , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Male , Safety , Treatment Outcome , Visual Acuity
14.
Vision Res ; 41(9): 1139-44, 2001 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11292504

ABSTRACT

To examine how the time course of rapid events of adaptation affect motion vision, the lower threshold of motion (LTM) was measured for suprathreshold sinusoidal gratings in presence of transient and steady glare. In the case of the transient condition, glare and stimulus were presented separated in time by a variable extent (SOA: 50-450 ms). A two alternative forced choice paradigm using the method of constant stimuli was adopted to measure the LTM. It was found that LTM follows the characteristic Crawford's time course of adaptation. Results are similar for two stimulus duration (300 and 500 ms). It was proposed that the increment of contrast threshold for displacing gratings (C(tq)) due to the loss of sensitivity produced by the sudden onset of the glare source can explain the results.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Ocular/physiology , Motion Perception/physiology , Sensory Thresholds/physiology , Glare , Humans , Psychometrics , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL