Microenvironmental reorganization in brain tumors following radiotherapy and recurrence revealed by hyperplexed immunofluorescence imaging.

The tumor microenvironment plays a crucial role in determining response to treatment. This involves a series of interconnected changes in the cellular landscape, spatial organization, and extracellular matrix composition. However, assessing these alterations simultaneously is challenging from a spatial perspective, due to the limitations of current high-dimensional imaging techniques and the extent of intratumoral heterogeneity over large lesion areas. In this study, we introduce a spatial proteomic workflow termed Hyperplexed Immunofluorescence Imaging (HIFI) that overcomes these limitations. HIFI allows for the simultaneous analysis of > 45 markers in fragile tissue sections at high magnification, using a cost-effective high-throughput workflow. We integrate HIFI with machine learning feature detection, graph-based network analysis, and cluster-based neighborhood analysis to analyze the microenvironment response to radiation therapy in a preclinical model of glioblastoma, and compare this response to a mouse model of breast-to-brain metastasis. Here we show that glioblastomas undergo extensive spatial reorganization of immune cell populations and structural architecture in response to treatment, while brain metastases show no comparable reorganization. Our integrated spatial analyses reveal highly divergent responses to radiation therapy between brain tumor models, despite equivalent radiotherapy benefit.

A Monte Carlo simulation-based decision support system for radiation oncologists in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme.

In the present research, we have developed a model-based crisp logic function statistical classifier decision support system supplemented with treatment planning systems for radiation oncologists in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). This system is based on Monte Carlo radiation transport simulation and it recreates visualization of treatment environments on mathematical anthropomorphic brain (MAB) phantoms. Energy deposition within tumour tissue and normal tissues are graded by quality audit factors which ensure planned dose delivery to tumour site thereby minimising damages to healthy tissues. The proposed novel methodology predicts tumour growth response to radiation therapy from a patient-specific medicine quality audit perspective. Validation of the study was achieved by recreating thirty-eight patient-specific mathematical anthropomorphic brain phantoms of treatment environments by taking into consideration density variation and composition of brain tissues. Dose computations accomplished through water phantom, tissue-equivalent head phantoms are neither cost-effective, nor patient-specific customized and is often less accurate. The above-highlighted drawbacks can be overcome by using open-source Electron Gamma Shower (EGSnrc) software and clinical case reports for MAB phantom synthesis which would result in accurate dosimetry with due consideration to the time factors. Considerable dose deviations occur at the tumour site for environments with intraventricular glioblastoma, haematoma, abscess, trapped air and cranial flaps leading to quality factors with a lower logic value of 0. Logic value of 1 depicts higher dose deposition within healthy tissues and also leptomeninges for majority of the environments which results in radiation-induced laceration.

Profile of miRNAs in small extracellular vesicles released from glioblastoma cells treated by boron neutron capture therapy.

PURPOSE: Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a tumor cell-selective particle-radiation therapy. In BNCT, administered p-boronophenylalanine (BPA) is selectively taken up by tumor cells, and the tumor is irradiated with thermal neutrons. High-LET α-particles and recoil 7Li, which have a path length of 5-9 µm, are generated by the capture reaction between 10B and thermal neutrons and selectively kill tumor cells that have uptaken 10B. Although BNCT has prolonged the survival time of malignant glioma patients, recurrences are still to be resolved. miRNAs, that are encapsulated in small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) in body fluids and exist stably may serve critical role in recurrence. In this study, we comprehensively investigated microRNAs (miRNAs) in sEVs released from post-BNCT glioblastoma cells. METHOD: Glioblastoma U87 MG cells were treated with 25 ppm of BPA in the culture media and irradiated with thermal neutrons. After irradiation, they were plated into dishes and cultured for 3 days in the 5% CO2 incubator. Then, sEVs released into the medium were collected by column chromatography, and miRNAs in sEVs were comprehensively investigated using microarrays. RESULT: An increase in 20 individual miRNAs (ratio > 2) and a decrease in 2 individual miRNAs (ratio < 0.5) were detected in BNCT cells compared with non-irradiated cells. Among detected miRNAs, 20 miRNAs were associated with worse prognosis of glioma in Kaplan Meier Survival Analysis of overall survival in TCGA. CONCLUSION: These miRNA after BNCT may proceed tumors, modulate radiation resistance, or inhibit invasion and affect the prognosis of glioma.

Standard therapy or additionally radioactive iodine (131I) therapy; which will stop the recurrence of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)?

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive malignant brain tumour. The average survival time for a patient diagnosed with GBM, using standard treatment methods, is several months. Authors of the article pose a direct question: Is it possible to treat GBM solely with radioactive iodine (¹³¹I) therapy without employing the sodium iodide symporter (NIS) gene? After all, NIS has been detected not only in the thyroid but also in various tumours. The main author of this article (A.C.), with the assistance of her colleagues (physicians and pharmacologists), underwent ¹³¹I therapy after prior iodine inhibition, resulting in approximately 30% reduction in tumour size as revealed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Classical therapy for GBM encompasses neurosurgery, conventional radiotherapy, and chemotherapy (e.g. temozolomide). Currently, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (imatinib, sunitinib, and sorafenib) are being used. Additionally, novel drugs such as crizotinib, entrectinib, or larotrectinib are being applied. Recently, personalised multimodal immunotherapy (IMI) based on anti-tumour vaccines derived from oncolytic viruses has been developed, concomitant with the advancement of cellular and molecular immunology. Thus, ¹³¹I therapy has been successfully employed for the first time in the case of GBM recurrence.

A novel immune cell signature for predicting glioblastoma after radiotherapy prognosis and guiding therapy.

Background: Glioblastoma, a highly aggressive brain tumor, poses a significant clinical challenge, particularly in the context of radiotherapy. In this study, we aimed to explore infiltrating immune cells and identify immune-related genes associated with glioblastoma radiotherapy prognosis. Subsequently, we constructed a signature based on these genes to discern differences in molecular and tumor microenvironment immune characteristics, ultimately informing potential therapeutic strategies for patients with varying risk profiles. Methods: We leveraged UCSC Xena and CGGA gene expression profiles from post-radiotherapy glioblastoma as verification cohorts. Infiltration ratios were stratified into high and low groups based on the median value. Differential gene expression was determined through Limma differential analysis. A signature comprising four genes was constructed, guided by Gene Ontology (GO) functional enrichment results and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. We evaluated differences in cell infiltration levels, Immune Score, Stromal Score, and ESTIMATE Score and their Pearson correlations with the signature. Spearman's correlation was computed between the signature and patient drug sensitivity (IC50), predicted using Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) and CCLE databases. Results: Notably, the infiltration of central memory CD8+T cells exhibited a significant correlation with glioblastoma radiotherapy prognosis. Samples were dichotomized into high- and low-risk groups based on the optimal signature threshold (2.466642). Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analysis revealed that the high-risk group experienced a significantly poorer prognosis (p = .0068), with AUC values exceeding 0.82 at 1, 3, and 5 years, underscoring the robust predictive potential of the signature scoring system. Independent validation sets substantiated the validity of the signature. Statistically significant differences in tumor microenvironments (p < .05) were observed between high- and low-risk groups, and these differences were significantly correlated with the signature (p < .05). Furthermore, there were significant correlations between high and low-risk groups regarding immune checkpoint expressions, Immune Prognostic Score (IPS), and Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) scores. Conclusion: The immune cell signature, comprising SDC-1, PLAUR, FN1, and CXCL13, holds promise as a predictive tool for assessing glioblastoma prognosis following radiotherapy. This signature also offers valuable guidance for tailoring treatment strategies, emphasizing its potential clinical relevance in improving patient outcomes.

Simultaneous boost radiotherapy versus conventional dose radiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a multi-institutional analysis.

We compared survival outcomes of high-dose concomitant boost radiotherapy (HDCBRT) and conventional dose radiotherapy (CRT) for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GB). Patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for newly diagnosed GB were included. In HDCBRT, specific targets received 69, 60, and 51 Gy in 30 fractions, while 60 Gy in 30 fractions was administered with a standard radiotherapy method in CRT. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared using the Log-rank test, followed by multivariate Cox analysis. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was also applied to each analysis. Among 102 eligible patients, 45 received HDCBRT and 57 received CRT. With a median follow-up of 16 months, the median survival times of OS and PFS were 21 and 9 months, respectively. No significant differences were observed in OS or PFS in the Kaplan-Meier analyses. In the multivariate analysis, HDCBRT correlated with improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.90; P = 0.021), and this result remained consistent after IPTW adjustments (P = 0.028). Conversely, dose suppression due to the proximity of normal tissues and IMRT field correlated with worse OS and PFS (P = 0.008 and 0.049, respectively). A prospective study with a stricter protocol is warranted to validate the efficacy of HDCBRT for GB.

Personalized radiation therapy for glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumor with an estimated 14,000 Americans diagnosed with this disease annually. This disease is treated with maximal surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiation therapy. Radiation therapy was initially delivered to the whole brain and with no concurrent or adjuvant systemic therapy. Advances in imaging and treatment delivery have allowed for partial brain irradiation to minimize radiation dose to normal structures, as well as sparing structures important for memory such as the hippocampus, decreasing morbidity and toxicity. While there is no consensus on the optimal radiation volume needed to successfully treat glioblastoma, there is consensus that the tumor bed with margin is preferable to treatment of the whole brain. Additionally, advances in knowledge regarding tumor biology have demonstrated the benefit of concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy, as well as demonstrated that methylation of genes in the tumor can predispose greater responsiveness to chemotherapy. The following review describes the advancements in specific radiation techniques that have been used to improve the therapeutic ratio for management of glioblastoma and methods used to personalize radiation treatment for patients based on genomic markers as well as clinical factors. The review also describes future investigations that are currently taking place in order to enable a further improvement of clinical outcomes for patients with glioblastoma.

Evolving concepts in margin strategies and adaptive radiotherapy for glioblastoma: A new future is on the horizon.

Chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment after maximal safe resection for glioblastoma (GBM). Despite advances in molecular profiling, surgical techniques, and neuro-imaging, there have been no major breakthroughs in radiotherapy (RT) volumes in decades. Although the majority of recurrences occur within the original gross tumor volume (GTV), treatment of a clinical target volume (CTV) ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 cm beyond the GTV remains the standard of care. Over the past 15 years, the incorporation of standard and functional MRI sequences into the treatment workflow has become a routine practice with increasing adoption of MR simulators, and new integrated MR-Linac technologies allowing for daily pre-, intra- and post-treatment MR imaging. There is now unprecedented ability to understand the tumor dynamics and biology of GBM during RT, and safe CTV margin reduction is being investigated with the goal of improving the therapeutic ratio. The purpose of this review is to discuss margin strategies and the potential for adaptive RT for GBM, with a focus on the challenges and opportunities associated with both online and offline adaptive workflows. Lastly, opportunities to biologically guide adaptive RT using non-invasive imaging biomarkers and the potential to define appropriate volumes for dose modification will be discussed.

Integrating multi-modal imaging in radiation treatments for glioblastoma.

Advances in diagnostic and treatment technology along with rapid developments in translational research may now allow the realization of precision radiotherapy. Integration of biologically informed multimodality imaging to address the spatial and temporal heterogeneity underlying treatment resistance in glioblastoma is now possible for patient care, with evidence of safety and potential benefit. Beyond their diagnostic utility, several candidate imaging biomarkers have emerged in recent early-phase clinical trials of biologically based radiotherapy, and their definitive assessment in multicenter prospective trials is already in development. In this review, the rationale for clinical implementation of candidate advanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography imaging biomarkers to guide personalized radiotherapy, the current landscape, and future directions for integrating imaging biomarkers into radiotherapy for glioblastoma are summarized. Moving forward, response-adaptive radiotherapy using biologically informed imaging biomarkers to address emerging treatment resistance in rational combination with novel systemic therapies may ultimately permit improvements in glioblastoma outcomes and true individualization of patient care.

Brain Re-Irradiation Or Chemotherapy: a phase II randomised trial of re-irradiation and chemotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BRIOChe) - protocol for a multi-centre open-label randomised trial.

INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common adult primary malignant brain tumour. The condition is incurable and, despite aggressive treatment at first presentation, almost all tumours recur after a median of 7 months. The aim of treatment at recurrence is to prolong survival and maintain health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Chemotherapy is typically employed for recurrent GBM, often using nitrosourea-based regimens. However, efficacy is limited, with reported median survivals between 5 and 9 months from recurrence. Although less commonly used in the UK, there is growing evidence that re-irradiation may produce survival outcomes at least similar to nitrosourea-based chemotherapy. However, there remains uncertainty as to the optimum approach and there is a paucity of available data, especially with regards to HRQoL. Brain Re-Irradiation Or Chemotherapy (BRIOChe) aims to assess re-irradiation, as an acceptable treatment option for recurrent IDH-wild-type GBM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: BRIOChe is a phase II, multi-centre, open-label, randomised trial in patients with recurrent GBM. The trial uses Sargent's three-outcome design and will recruit approximately 55 participants from 10 to 15 UK radiotherapy sites, allocated (2:1) to receive re-irradiation (35 Gy in 10 daily fractions) or nitrosourea-based chemotherapy (up to six, 6-weekly cycles). The primary endpoint is overall survival rate for re-irradiation patients at 9 months. There will be no formal statistical comparison between treatment arms for the decision-making primary analysis. The chemotherapy arm will be used for calibration purposes, to collect concurrent data to aid interpretation of results. Secondary outcomes include HRQoL, dexamethasone requirement, anti-epileptic drug requirement, radiological response, treatment compliance, acute and late toxicities, progression-free survival. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: BRIOChe obtained ethical approval from Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (reference no. 20/NI/0070). Final trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and adhere to the ICMJE guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN60524.

Radiotherapy protocols for mouse cancer model.

Radiotherapy is a crucial treatment modality for cancer patients, with approximately 60% of individuals undergoing ionizing radiation as part of their disease management. In recent years, there has been a growing trend toward minimizing irradiation fields through the use of image-guided dosimetry and innovative technologies. These advancements allow for selective irradiation, delivering higher local doses while reducing the number of treatment sessions. Consequently, computer-assisted methods have significantly enhanced the effectiveness of radiotherapy in the curative and palliative treatment of various cancers. Although radiation therapy alone can effectively achieve local control in some cancer types, it may not be sufficient for others. As a result, further preclinical research is necessary to explore novel approaches including new schedules of radiotherapy treatments. Unfortunately, there is a concerning lack of correlation between clinical outcomes and experiments conducted on mouse models. We hypothesize that this disparity arises from the differences in irradiation strategies employed in preclinical studies compared to those used in clinical practice, which ultimately affects the translatability of findings to patients. In this study, we present two comprehensive radiotherapy protocols for the treatment of orthotopic melanoma and glioblastoma tumors. These protocols utilize a small animal radiation research platform, which is an ideal radiation device for delivering localized and precise X-ray doses to the tumor mass. By employing these platforms, we aim to limit the side effects associated with irradiating healthy surrounding tissues. Our detailed protocols offer a valuable framework for conducting preclinical studies that closely mimic clinical radiotherapy techniques, bridging the gap between experimental results and patient outcomes.

Hypofractionated re-irradiation with bevacizumab for relapsed chemorefractory glioblastoma after prior high dose radiotherapy: a feasible option for patients with large-volume relapse.

PURPOSE: There remains no standard of care for patients with recurrent and chemorefractory glioblastoma. Re-irradiation (reRT) provides an additional management option. However, published series predominantly focus on small reRT volumes utilizing stereotactic hypofractionated regimens. Concerns regarding toxicity have limited utilisation of reRT for larger recurrences, however this may be mitigated with use of bevacizumab (BEV). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prospective database of patients managed with the EORTC-NCIC (Stupp) protocol 60 Gy chemoradiotherapy protocol for glioblastoma between 2007 and 2021 was reviewed for those patients receiving reRT for chemorefractory relapse. Serial MRI and PET were used to establish true progression and exclude patients with pseudoprogression or radionecrosis from reRT. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from date of reRT. Prognostic factors were also assessed. RESULTS: 447 patients managed for glioblastoma under the Stupp protocol were identified, of which 372 had relapsed and were thus eligible for reRT. 71 patients underwent reRT. Median relapse-free survival from diagnosis for the reRT and overall cohorts were similar at 11.6 months (95%CI:9.4-14.2) and 11.8 months (95%CI:9.4-14.2) respectively. 60/71 (85%) reRT patients had received BEV prior to reRT and continued concurrent BEV during reRT. Of the 11 patients not managed with BEV during reRT, 10 required subsequent salvage BEV. ReRT patients were younger (median 53 vs. 59 years, p < 0.001), had better performance status (86% vs. 69% ECOG 0-1, p = 0.002) and more commonly had MGMT promoter-methylated tumours (54% vs. 40%, p = 0.083) compared to non-reRT patients. Median reRT PTV volume was 135cm3 (IQR: 69-207cm3). Median OS from reRT to death was 7.1 months (95%CI:6.3-7.9). Patients aged < 50, 50-70 and > 70 years had post-reRT median OS of 7.7, 6.4 and 6.0 months respectively (p = 0.021). Median post-reRT survival was longer for patients with ECOG performance status 0-1 compared to 2-3 (8.1 vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.039). PTV volume, site of relapse, MGMT promoter-methylation status and extent of initial surgical resection were not associated with post-reRT survival. ReRT was well-tolerated. Out of the 6 patients (8%) admitted to hospital after reRT, only one was for reRT toxicity. This was a CTCAE grade 3 radiation necrosis event in a patient managed without prior BEV. CONCLUSION: Patients with recurrent glioblastoma who have been previously treated with 60 Gy radiotherapy have a meaningful survival benefit from large volume re-irradiation which is well tolerated. ReRT should not be ignored as a salvage treatment option in patients with chemorefractory progressive disease.

Adjuvant re-irradiation vs. no early re-irradiation of resected recurrent glioblastoma: pooled comparative cohort analysis from two tertiary centers.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management strategy for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) remains uncertain, and the impact of re-irradiation (Re-RT) on overall survival (OS) is still a matter of debate. This study included patients who achieved gross total resection (GTR) after a second surgery after recurrence, following the GlioCave criteria. METHODS: Inclusion criteria include being 18 years or older, having histologically confirmed locally recurrent IDHwt or IDH unknown GBM, achieving MRI-proven GTR after the second surgery, having a Karnofsky performance status of at least 60% after the second surgery, having a minimum interval of 6 months between the first radiotherapy and the second surgery, and a maximum of 8 weeks from second surgery to the start of Re-RT. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients have met the inclusion criteria. The median OS after the second surgery was 14 months. All patients underwent standard treatment after initial diagnosis, including maximum safe resection, adjuvant radiochemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Re-RT did not significantly impact OS. However, MGMT promoter methylation status and a longer interval (> 12 months) between treatments were associated with better OS. Multivariate analysis revealed the MGMT status as the only significant predictor of OS. CONCLUSION: Factors such as MGMT promoter methylation status and treatment interval play crucial roles in determining patient outcomes after second surgery. Personalized treatment strategies should consider these factors to optimize the management of rGBM. Prospective research is needed to define the value of re-RT after second surgery and to inform decision making in this situation.

Modification of BCLX pre-mRNA splicing has antitumor efficacy alone or in combination with radiotherapy in human glioblastoma cells.

Dysregulation of anti-apoptotic and pro-apoptotic protein isoforms arising from aberrant splicing is a crucial hallmark of cancers and may contribute to therapeutic resistance. Thus, targeting RNA splicing to redirect isoform expression of apoptosis-related genes could lead to promising anti-cancer phenotypes. Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common type of malignant brain tumor in adults. In this study, through RT-PCR and Western Blot analysis, we found that BCLX pre-mRNA is aberrantly spliced in GBM cells with a favored splicing of anti-apoptotic Bcl-xL. Modulation of BCLX pre-mRNA splicing using splice-switching oligonucleotides (SSOs) efficiently elevated the pro-apoptotic isoform Bcl-xS at the expense of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-xL. Induction of Bcl-xS by SSOs activated apoptosis and autophagy in GBM cells. In addition, we found that ionizing radiation could also modulate the alternative splicing of BCLX. In contrast to heavy (carbon) ion irradiation, low energy X-ray radiation-induced an increased ratio of Bcl-xL/Bcl-xS. Inhibiting Bcl-xL through splicing regulation can significantly enhance the radiation sensitivity of 2D and 3D GBM cells. These results suggested that manipulation of BCLX pre-mRNA alternative splicing by splice-switching oligonucleotides is a novel approach to inhibit glioblastoma tumorigenesis alone or in combination with radiotherapy.

Implementation and evaluation of a dynamic contrast-enhanced MR perfusion protocol for glioblastoma using a 0.35 T MRI-Linac system.

PURPOSE: MRI-linear accelerator (MRI-Linac) systems allow for daily tracking of MRI changes during radiotherapy (RT). Since one common MRI-Linac operates at 0.35 T, there are efforts towards developing protocols at that field strength. In this study we demonstrate the implementation of a post-contrast 3DT1-weighted (3D-T1w) and dynamic contrast-enhancement (DCE) protocol to assess glioblastoma response to RT using a 0.35 T MRI-Linac. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The protocol implemented was used to acquire 3D-T1w and DCE data from a flow phantom and two patients with glioblastoma (a responder and a non-responder) who underwent RT on a 0.35 T MRI-Linac. The detection of post-contrast-enhanced volumes was evaluated by comparing the 3DT1w images from the 0.35 T MRI-Linac to images obtained using a 3 T scanner. The DCE data were tested temporally and spatially using data from a flow phantom and patients. Ktrans maps were derived from DCE at three time points (a week before treatment-Pre RT, four weeks through treatment-Mid RT, and three weeks after treatment-Post RT) and were validated with patients' treatment outcomes. RESULTS: The 3D-T1w contrast-enhancement volumes were visually and volumetrically similar between 0.35 T MRI-Linac and 3 T. DCE images showed temporal stability, and associated Ktrans maps were consistent with patient response to treatment. On average, Ktrans values showed a 54 % decrease and 8.6 % increase for a responder and non-responder respectively when Pre RT and Mid RT images were compared. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the feasibility of obtaining post-contrast 3D-T1w and DCE data from patients with glioblastoma using a 0.35 T MRI-Linac system.

Glut-3 Gene Knockdown as a Potential Strategy to Overcome Glioblastoma Radioresistance.

The hypoxic pattern of glioblastoma (GBM) is known to be a primary cause of radioresistance. Our study explored the possibility of using gene knockdown of key factors involved in the molecular response to hypoxia, to overcome GBM radioresistance. We used the U87 cell line subjected to chemical hypoxia generated by CoCl2 and exposed to 2 Gy of X-rays, as single or combined treatments, and evaluated gene expression changes of biomarkers involved in the Warburg effect, cell cycle control, and survival to identify the best molecular targets to be knocked-down, among those directly activated by the HIF-1α transcription factor. By this approach, glut-3 and pdk-1 genes were chosen, and the effects of their morpholino-induced gene silencing were evaluated by exploring the proliferative rates and the molecular modifications of the above-mentioned biomarkers. We found that, after combined treatments, glut-3 gene knockdown induced a greater decrease in cell proliferation, compared to pdk-1 gene knockdown and strong upregulation of glut-1 and ldha, as a sign of cell response to restore the anaerobic glycolysis pathway. Overall, glut-3 gene knockdown offered a better chance of controlling the anaerobic use of pyruvate and a better proliferation rate reduction, suggesting it is a suitable silencing target to overcome radioresistance.

Very high-energy electron therapy as light-particle alternative to transmission proton FLASH therapy - An evaluation of dosimetric performances.

PURPOSE: Clinical translation of FLASH-radiotherapy (RT) to deep-seated tumours is still a technological challenge. One proposed solution consists of using ultra-high dose rate transmission proton (TP) beams of about 200-250 MeV to irradiate the tumour with the flat entrance of the proton depth-dose profile. This work evaluates the dosimetric performance of very high-energy electron (VHEE)-based RT (50-250 MeV) as a potential alternative to TP-based RT for the clinical transfer of the FLASH effect. METHODS: Basic physics characteristics of VHEE and TP beams were compared utilizing Monte Carlo simulations in water. A VHEE-enabled research treatment planning system was used to evaluate the plan quality achievable with VHEE beams of different energies, compared to 250 MeV TP beams for a glioblastoma, an oesophagus, and a prostate cancer case. RESULTS: Like TP, VHEE above 100 MeV can treat targets with roughly flat (within ± 20 %) depth-dose distributions. The achievable dosimetric target conformity and adjacent organs-at-risk (OAR) sparing is consequently driven for both modalities by their lateral beam penumbrae. Electron beams of 400[500] MeV match the penumbra of 200[250] MeV TP beams and penumbra is increased for lower electron energies. For the investigated patient cases, VHEE plans with energies of 150 MeV and above achieved a dosimetric plan quality comparable to that of 250 MeV TP plans. For the glioblastoma and the oesophagus case, although having a decreased conformity, even 100 MeV VHEE plans provided a similar target coverage and OAR sparing compared to TP. CONCLUSIONS: VHEE-based FLASH-RT using sufficiently high beam energies may provide a lighter-particle alternative to TP-based FLASH-RT with comparable dosimetric plan quality.

Hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation for progressive glioblastoma: twelve years' experience of a single center.

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic factors and the role of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) as a re-irradiation technique in the management of progressive glioblastoma. METHODS: The records of 77 previously irradiated glioblastoma patients who progressed and received second course hypofractionated SRT (1-5 fractions) between 2009 and 2022 in our department were evaluated retrospectively. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was utilized for all statistical analyses. RESULTS: The median time to progression from the end of initial radiotherapy was 14 months (range, 6-68 months). The most common SRT schedule was 30 Gy (range, 18-50 Gy) in 5 fractions (range, 1-5 fractions). The median follow-up after SRT was 9 months (range, 3-80 months). One-year overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates after SRT were 46% and 35%, respectively. Re-irradiation dose and the presence of pseudoprogression were both significant independent positive prognostic factors for both OS (p = 0.009 and p = 0.04, respectively) and PFS (p = 0.008 and p = 0.04, respectively). For PFS, progression-free interval > 14 months was also a prognostic factor (p = 0.04). The treatment was well tolerated without significant acute toxicity. During follow-up, radiation necrosis was observed in 17 patients (22%), and 14 (82%) of them were asymptomatic. CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated SRT is an effective treatment approach for patients with progressive glioblastoma. Younger patients who progressed later than 14 months, received higher SRT doses, and experienced pseudoprogression following SRT had improved survival rates.

Antitumor activity of 5-hydroxy-3',4',6,7-tetramethoxyflavone in glioblastoma cell lines and its antagonism with radiotherapy.

5-Hydroxy-3',4',6,7-tetramethoxyflavone (TMF) is a plant-origin flavone known for its anti-cancer properties. In the present study, the cytotoxic effect of TMF was evaluated in the U87MG and T98G glioblastoma (GBM) cell lines. The effect of TMF on cell viability was assessed with trypan blue exclusion assay and crystal violet staining. In addition, flow cytometry was performed to examine its effect on the different phases of the cell cycle, and in vitro scratch wound assay assessed the migratory capacity of the treated cells. Furthermore, the effect of in vitro radiotherapy was also evaluated with a combination of TMF and radiation. In both cell lines, TMF treatment resulted in G0/G1 cell cycle arrest, reduced cell viability, and reduced cell migratory capacity. In contrast, there was an antagonistic property of TMF treatment with radiotherapy. These results demonstrated the antineoplastic effect of TMF in GBM cells in vitro, but the antagonistic effect with radiotherapy indicated that TMF should be further evaluated for its possible antitumor role post-radiotherapy.