Prognostic Factors of Gliosarcoma in the Real World: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Purpose: Gliosarcoma is a histopathological variant of glioblastoma, which is characterized by a biphasic growth pattern consisting of glial and sarcoma components. Owing to its scarcity, data regarding the impact of available treatments on the clinical outcomes of gliosarcoma are inadequate. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to analyze the prognostic factors of gliosarcoma. Methods: By screening the clinical database of neurosurgical cases at a single center, patients with gliosarcoma diagnosed histologically from 2013 to 2021 were identified. Clinical, pathological, and molecular data were gathered founded on medical records and follow-up interviews. Prognostic factors were derived using the Cox proportional hazards model with backward stepwise regression analysis. Results: Forty-five GSM patients were included. Median overall survival was 25.6 months (95% CI 8.0-43.1), and median relapse-free survival was 15.2 months (95% CI 9.7-20.8). In multivariable analysis, total resection (p = 0.023, HR = 0.192, 95% CI 0.046-0.797) indicated an improved prognosis. And low expression of Ki-67 (p = 0.059, HR = 2.803, 95% CI 0.963-8.162) would be likely to show statistical significance. However, there might be no statistically significant survival benefit from radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide (n = 33, 73.3%, log-rank p = 0.99) or adjuvant temozolomide (n = 32, 71.1%, log-rank p = 0.74). Conclusion: This single-center retrospective study with a limited cohort size has demonstrated the treatment of gross total resection and low expression of Ki-67 which are beneficial for patients with GSM, while radiotherapy or temozolomide is not.

Gliosarcoma: The Distinct Genomic Alterations Identified by Comprehensive Analysis of Copy Number Variations.

Gliosarcoma (GSM), a histologic variant of glioblastoma (GBM), carries a poor prognosis with less than one year of median survival. Though GSM is similar with GBM in most clinical and pathological symptoms, GBM has unique molecular and histological features. However, as the rarity of GSM samples, the genetic information of this tumor is still lacking. Here, we take a comprehensive analysis of DNA copy number variations (CNV) in GBM and GSM. Whole genome sequencing was performed on 21 cases of GBM and 15 cases of GSM. CNVKIT is used for CNV calling. Our data showed that chromosomes 7, 8, 9, and 10 were the regions where CNV frequently happened in both GBM and GSM. There was a distinct CNV signal in chromosome 2 especially in GSM. The pathway enrichment of genes with CNV was suggested that the GBM and GSM shared the similar mechanism of tumor development. However, the CNV of some screened genes displayed a disparate form between GBM and GSM, such as AMP, BEND2, HDAC6, FOXP3, ZBTB33, TFE3, and VEGFD. It meant that GSM was a distinct subgroup possessing typical biomarkers. The pathways and copy number alterations detected in this study may represent key drivers in gliosarcoma oncogenesis and may provide a starting point toward targeted oncologic analysis with therapeutic potential.

Primary versus secondary gliosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Gliosarcomas are extremely rare malignant brain tumors, which can be classified as primary gliosarcoma (PGS) if the tumors arise de novo or secondary gliosarcoma (SGS) in patients who had previously been treated for glioblastoma. Given their rarity, it is unclear if PGS is clinically and genetically different from SGS. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features, prognostic survivals, and molecular profiles of these rare tumors. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Web of Science for relevant studies. Odds ratio (OR), hazard ratio (HR), and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using the random-effect model. RESULTS: We included eight studies with 239 PGS and 79 SGS for meta-analyses. Compared to PGS, SGS occurred at a younger age and had lower rates of gross total resection and radiation therapy. Bevacizumab was more commonly administered in SGS. SGS patients had a significantly worse PFS (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.40-0.89) and OS (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.31-0.68) in comparison to PGS. The incidences of EGFR mutation, IDH mutation, and MGMT methylation were not statistically different between PGS and SGS. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that PGS and SGS had distinct clinicopathological profiles and prognoses but shared similar genetic profiles. This study facilitates our understanding of how these two malignant brain tumors behave clinically, but future studies will be required to elucidate the genetic pathways of PGS and SGS.

Survival outcomes associated with MGMT promoter methylation and temozolomide in gliosarcoma patients.

PURPOSE: Gliosarcoma is an uncommon glioblastoma subtype, for which MGMT promoter methylation's relationship with response to temozolomide chemotherapy is unclear. We therefore examined this question using a national cohort. METHODS:  The National Cancer Database was queried for patients histopathologically diagnosed with gliosarcoma between 2010 and 2019. The associations between MGMT promoter methylation, first-line single-agent chemotherapy-presumed to be temozolomide herein-and overall survival (OS) were examined using log-rank tests and Cox regression, with correction for multiple testing (p < 0.01 was significant). RESULTS: 580 newly-diagnosed gliosarcoma patients with MGMT status were available, among whom 33.6% were MGMT promoter methylated. Median OS for gliosarcoma patients that received standard-of-care temozolomide and radiotherapy was 12.1 months (99% confidence interval [CI] 10.8-15.1) for MGMT promoter unmethylated and 21.4 months (99% CI 15.4-26.2) for MGMT promoter methylated gliosarcomas (p = 0.003). In multivariable analysis of gliosarcoma patients-which included the potential confounders of age, sex, maximal tumor size, extent of resection, and radiotherapy-receipt of temozolomide was associated with improved OS in both MGMT promoter methylated (hazard ratio [HR] 0.23 vs. no temozolomide, 99% CI 0.11-0.47, p < 0.001) and unmethylated (HR 0.50 vs. no temozolomide, 99% CI 0.29-0.89, p = 0.002) gliosarcomas. MGMT promoter methylation was associated with improved OS among temozolomide-treated gliosarcoma patients (p < 0.001), but not in patients who did not receive chemotherapy (p = 0.35). CONCLUSION: In a national analysis of gliosarcoma patients, temozolomide was associated with prolonged OS irrespective of MGMT status. These results provide support for the current practice of trimodal therapy for gliosarcoma.

Gliosarcoma with osteosarcomatous component: A case report and short review illustration.

BACKGROUND: Gliosarcoma (GS) represents a rare variant of glioblastoma in the central nervous system, characterized by biphasic histopathological features of gliomatous and sarcomatous components. Here, we present an unusual case of GS, which also demonstrated osteosarcomatous differentiation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old female patient underwent gross total resection (GTR) of the right temporal lobe lesion. Subsequently received 60 Gy external beam radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Postoperative histopathological analysis indicated that the sarcomatous portion of the typical fibrosarcoma pattern mingled with areas of osteoid structure. The molecular pathological analysis demonstrated IDH1/2 wild-type and MGMT promoter island methylated phenotype. Target Enrichment Sequencing (TES) was performed on the gliomatous and sarcomatous components of the tumor tissues. TERT promoter, RB1, NF1, TP53 mutations and copy number variations (CNVs) on chromosome 7, 10q, 11q, 12, 13, 17 and 22 were observed in gliomatous and fibro-sarcomatous mixed tumor tissue; While we found TERT promoter, RB1, TP53 mutations and CNVs on chromosome 2q, 3q, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 22 in osteosarcomatous component. Noteworthy, EGFR amplification was not observed in both gliomatous/fibro-sarcomatous and osteosarcomatous components. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated with histopathology, molecular pathology, and genomic alteration analysis, we report a case of GS with an extremely rare histopathologic phenotype of osteosarcomatous differentiation, who also suffered lung multi-metastases. Additionally, synthesizing the literature review, our study of this unusual differentiation of GS into osteosarcoma may provide novel insight into the natural history of GS.

Clinical and survival characteristics of primary and secondary gliosarcoma patients.

PURPOSE: Gliosarcoma (GS) is classified by the World Health Organization as a subtype of glioblastoma with sarcomatous features. GS have a propensity to metastasize, as opposed to other gliomas, with lower 5-year survival rates than GBM patients. In this study, we identified differences in survival between patients with primary and secondary GS. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients who presented at the MD Anderson Cancer Center with a pathology-confirmed diagnosis of GS. We defined overall survival (OS) from the date of pathological diagnosis of primary GS (from sarcomatous change for secondary GS). We defined progression-free survival (PFS) from the date of GS chemoradiation completion to radiographic disease progression. We used Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and the log-rank test to compare OS and PFS between primary and secondary GS. We used univariable Cox proportional hazard regression to assess differences in OS & PFS by various characteristics. RESULTS: We identified 94 GS patients; 70 had primary disease and 24 secondary. Molecular analysis of GS tumor samples revealed that 47.1% were GFAP positive, 38.5% S-100 positive, and 83.7% reticulin-positive. Among the tested samples, 3.8% had IDH and 73.1% had TP53 mutations. The median OS for all patients was 16.8 months. Median OS from the pathological diagnosis of GS was 17.3 months for primary and 10.2 months for secondary GS. Median OS for secondary GS was 28.9 months from initial diagnosis of the primary neoplasm. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the largest single institution evaluation of GS and provides insight into patterns of survival for GS.

The clinical, radiological, and immunohistochemical characteristics and outcomes of primary intracranial gliosarcoma: a retrospective single-centre study.

Primary intracranial gliosarcoma is a rare malignant brain tumour, and the most effective treatment for gliosarcoma remains unclear. This study aimed to identify risk factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in these cases. This retrospective single-centre study evaluated 103 patients (median age, 51 years; 67 men [65%]) with primary intracranial gliosarcoma between 2006 and 2017. Treatments included surgery (GTR, 63 patients; STR, 39 patients; biopsy, 1 patient), radiotherapy (adjuvant, 76 patients; exclusive treatment, 1 patient), and chemotherapy (adjuvant temozolomide, 52 patients; adjuvant nimustine/teniposide, 19 patients; adjuvant bevacizumab, 1 patient; exclusive nimustine/teniposide treatment, 1 patient). The median OS was 13.3 months, and the median PFS was 9.1 months. In the multivariate analyses, the poor prognostic factors were ependymal lining enhancement of the lateral ventricle (PFS, HR 2.406, p = 0.005; OS, HR 2.946, p = 0.009) and enhancement in the motor functional cortex (PFS, HR 2.892, p = 0.002; OS, HR 2.639, p = 0.009). Good OS was predicted by adjuvant radiotherapy alone (HR 0.071, p < 0.001), adjuvant temozolomide-based chemotherapy alone (HR 0.063, p = 0.005), adjuvant temozolomide-based chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy (HR 0.056, p < 0.001), and salvage surgery at recurrence (HR 0.449, p = 0.031). The present study revealed that, in patients with primary intracranial gliosarcoma, enhancement in the functional motor cortex and ependymal lining enhancement of the lateral ventricle were both poor prognostic factors. Survival was optimized in cases treated using maximal safe resection followed by adjuvant temozolomide-based chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy. Furthermore, salvage surgery provided meaningful therapeutic benefits for recurrent gliosarcoma.

Treatments of gliosarcoma of the brain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gliosarcoma (GSM) is a rare central nervous system tumor. Clinical management of it is similar to glioblastoma (GBM). However, due to a few comparative studies exist, uncertainty and disagreements remain in the literatures. To assess the available evidence on the value of different treatments and to carry out an up-to-date evaluation to summarize the evidence for the optimal treatment in GSM patients. Free words were used to search for the relevant studies without language limitations in electronic databases including PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to September 15, 2019. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. The main endpoint was all-cause mortality. Overall, 10 studies published between 2008 and 2018 including 803 patients were selected for the meta-analysis. Temozolomide (TMZ)-dominated chemotherapy was associated with a reduced risk of overall survival (OS), with HR 0.49 (95% CI 0.37-0.66). The pooled HR of OS was 0.40 (95% CI 0.29-0.56) between radiotherapy and without radiotherapy. The pooled HR (0.52, 95% CI 0.32-0.85) indicated gross total resection (GTR) had a positive impact on OS in GSM. In patients with GSM, survival benefits as currently performed are associated with TMZ-dominated chemotherapy and high-dose radiotherapy. Our systematic review and meta-analysis also demonstrate GTR is associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality in patients with primary GSM.

Cell-free DNA and circulating TERT promoter mutation for disease monitoring in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma.

The clinical implications of plasmatic cell-free and tumor DNA (cfDNA and ctDNA) are challenging in glioblastoma. This prospective study included 52 consecutive newly diagnosed glioblastoma (n = 49) or gliosarcoma (n = 3) patients treated with concomitant temozolomide and radiotherapy (RT-TMZ), followed by a TMZ maintenance phase. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, before RT-TMZ (pre-RT-TMZ) and at the end of adjuvant TMZ, or at the time of progression in cases of progressive disease (PD). The cfDNA concentration was measured with a fluorometric method, and ctDNA was detected using targeted droplet digital PCR. The main objectives were to analyze the associations between cfDNA and ctDNA measurements during the course of treatment with PD and survival. There was a significant decrease in median cfDNA concentration from baseline to pre-RT-TMZ-19.4 versus 9.7 ng/mL (p < 0.0001)-in the entire cohort. In patients with PD, a significant increase in cfDNA concentration from pre-RT-TMZ to time of PD was observed, from 9.7 versus 13.1 ng/mL (p = 0.037), respectively, while no difference was observed for nonprogressive patients. Neither the cfDNA concentration at baseline nor its kinetics correlated with survival. ctDNA was detected in 2 patients (3.8%) and only in gliosarcoma subtypes.Trial registration ClinicalTrial, NCT02617745. Registered 1 December 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02617745?term=glioplak&draw=2&rank=1 .

Gliosarcoma case report and review of the literature.

Gliosarcoma is an unusual subtype of glioblastoma multiforme. Its characteristic features are biphasic configuration, constituting a definite, separate glial and sarcomatous differentiation, on histological evaluation. Herein, we present a rare case of Gliosarcoma that had presented only once in our center in last 13 years. A 60 years old, diabetic, hypertensive male patient came to e emergency department with disturbed level of consciousness and right sided hemiplegia which was progressive over four days. On examination he was, conscious, unoriented in time, person or place, his mouth deviated to left and vitally stable. After initial evaluation, CT scan and MRI were advised. These showed a complex left parieto-occipital heterogeneous mass lesion with cystic and solid components, measuring approximately 5.2x4cm. The mass lesion was seen displacing the occipital horn anteriorly and inferiorly with probable extension into the lateral ventricular cavity. There was no associated midline shift or definite herniation. The lesion was diagnosed as highly suggestive of brain tumor with a differential diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme or ependymoma. Blood picture revealed a rapidly increasing level of anemia. Surgical intervention comprising left parieto-occipital craniotomy and near total resection of the tumor was carried out. On histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation the diagnosis of GS was established. A plan of a combination of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation was formulated that was however, declined by the family. On regular follow up, the patients clinical state rapidly deteriorated with persistence of seizures and requirement of repeated blood transfusions. The patient finally passed away after eighth months.

Molecular and clonal evolution in recurrent metastatic gliosarcoma.

We discuss the molecular evolution of gliosarcoma, a mesenchymal type of glioblastoma (GBM), using the case of a 37-yr-old woman who developed two recurrences and an extracranial metastasis. She was initially diagnosed with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type gliosarcoma in the frontal lobe and treated with surgery followed by concurrent radiotherapy with temozolomide. Five months later the tumor recurred in the left frontal lobe, outside the initially resected area, and was treated with further surgery and radiotherapy. Six months later the patient developed a second left frontal recurrence and was again treated with surgery and radiotherapy. Six weeks later, further recurrence was observed in the brain and bone, and biopsy confirmed metastases in the pelvic bones. To understand the clonal relationships between the four tumor instances and the origin of metastasis, we performed whole-genome sequencing of the intracranial tumors and the tumor located in the right iliac bone. We compared their mutational and copy-number profiles and inferred the clonal phylogeny. The tumors harbored shared alterations in GBM driver genes, including mutations in TP53, NF1, and RB1, and CDKN2A deletion. Whole-genome doubling was identified in the first recurrence and the extracranial metastasis. Comparisons of the metastatic to intracranial tumors highlighted a high similarity in molecular profile but contrasting evidence regarding the origin of the metastasis. Subclonal reconstruction suggested a parallel evolution of the recurrent tumors, and that the metastatic tumor was largely derived from the first recurrence. We conclude that metastasis in glioma can be a late event in tumorigenesis.

Primary gliosarcoma: epidemiology, clinical presentation, management, and survival.

BACKGROUND: Gliosarcomas are malignant tumors of the central nervous system. As a variant of glioblastomas (GBM), they are treated in a similar fashion. However, there is growing evidence to suggest that they may be a separate entity. METHODS: Due to the rarity of primary gliosarcomas (PGS), here we publish data from a single center spanning over 14 years, comprising possibly one of the biggest case series in the literature to our knowledge. RESULTS: The mean age at presentation was 59 years with male preponderance (1.75:1). The most common presenting symptoms were balance and mobility issues (61%), followed by headaches (50%) and visual problems (39%). Tumours were most likely to involve the frontal and parietal lobes (27% and 21% respectively). Patients under 50 had a significant survival advantage (50% versus 32%). All patients had surgery, 79% had adjuvant radiotherapy, with a further 21% also receiving chemotherapy. Median survival from surgery of patients diagnosed with PGS was 6.6 months. Median and one-year survival were significantly better for patients who received radiotherapy (14 months; 46% one year survival) and improved further with combined radio- and chemotherapy (30 months; 77%, one year survival). CONCLUSIONS: For patients of good functional status, adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy is warranted and should be offered as it confers a much-improved overall survival.

Prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in adult primary gliosarcoma patients: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) analysis from 2004 to 2015.

Objective: Gliosarcoma (GSC), a rare malignant brain tumor, is considered as a variant of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 wild type (IDH1-WT) glioblastoma (GBM). This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the clinical characteristics of GSC and compare whether there are some differences of treatment strategies and outcomes between GSC and GBM patients through Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.Patients and methods: The clinical data of adults diagnosed with primary GSC between 2004 and 2015 were queried from SEER database. The Kaplan-Meier curve and the Cox model were performed to analyze the relationships between clinical parameters and patients' prognosis. Similar analyses were conducted for all primary GBM patients of SEER.Results: In total, 527 GSC and 20,541 GBM patients with complete and valid clinical information were finally enrolled for further analysis. Compared with GBM, GSC owned a proclivity to temporal lobe rather than frontal lobe (p < 0.001), a less conservative extension of resection (EOR) (p < 0.001), and a higher sensitivity to radiotherapy (p < 0.001). As shown by univariate analysis, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy could prolong the overall survival (OS) time of GSC, but EOR did not confer an advantage to the outcomes of patients, no matter whether combined radio/chemotherapy was given. In multivariate analysis, age more than 60 and lack of radio/chemotherapy were identified as independent risk factors for OS of GSC patients.Conclusions: Our study found that although EOR seemed to be important to GBM, the extent of surgery did not show a clear relationship with the improved prognosis of GSC. Additionally, radiotherapy and chemotherapy could prolong patients' survival time significantly, which suggests a more positive role of them in treating GSC and needs further investigations.

Prognostic factors among single primary gliosarcoma cases: A study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data from 1973-2013.

BACKGROUND: Prognostic factors for single primary gliosarcoma (PGS) remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to examine patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics as potential predictors of survival using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program data (1973-2013). METHODS: The patients of single PGS were selected based on the exclusion criteria from SEER. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze all the data. RESULTS: Single PGS has an apparent popularity for the temporal lobe (35.2%, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.440, 95%CI = 0.251-0.770) and frontal lobe (20.9%, HR = 0.408, 95%CI = 0.231-0.720) which could achieve a better survival rate than cerebrum (P = .034). The mean age at diagnosis was 60.07 ± 14.161. The overall 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year survival was 55.40%, 29.58%, 10.01%, and 2.73%. Age at diagnosis was proved to be a significant predictor of overall survival (OS) (P < .001). There is no significant difference in race, marital status, or grade. Patients' tumor size which is located in 41-60 mm (P = .047, HR = 1.468, 95%CI = 1.004-2.147) and >60 mm (P= .003, HR = 1.899, 95%CI = 1.244-2.901) showed a higher risk of death. Surgery played a critical role in OS (P < .001). Radiation after surgery was another predictor of OS of PGS (P < .001). Among all the radiation methods, combination of beam with implants or isotopes (P = .000, HR = 0.491, 95%CI = 0.412-0.585) or radiation NOS (P = .027, HR = 0.362, 95%CI = 0.148-0.889) were more beneficial to patients. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that single PGS has a poor prognosis. Prognosis of single PGS would become poorer along with patients' age and tumor size (>40 mm). Surgery intervention and radiation therapy were beneficial factors.

First in vitro evidence of modulated electro-hyperthermia treatment performance in combination with megavoltage radiation by clonogenic assay.

Modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT) is a form of hyperthermia used in the treatment of cancer. It is a variation that relies on a particular form of enhanced selectivity to enable more effective cancerous cell death yet maintaining the integrity of healthy non-cancerous cells. It is yet to successfully make the major step into the wider medical community despite several encouraging trials. In this study, we investigate mEHT from an in vitro perspective. We demonstrate a supra-additive effect on 9 L gliosarcoma cells when exposed to mEHT in combination with MV X-ray radiation. The supra-additive effect is hypothesized to be induced by the mEHT mechanism that in turn causes apoptosis, membrane damage and an increase in rate of cell growth. This proves to be extremely advantageous in the case of the aggressive 9 L cell line as it is known to be radioresistant. However, the universal success of this multimodal treatment does not appear to be positive for all cell lines and requires further research. Due to the fundamental approach taken in this research, our results also provide a new prospect for mEHT to be a tool for sterilizing otherwise radioresistant cancers.

Biological characteristics and outcomes of Gliosarcoma.

Gliosarcoma is a highly aggressive primary brain tumour. It is a relatively rare tumour and comprises of two histological components, glial and sarcomatous. Gliosarcomas carry a poorer prognosis than that of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM). The current review highlights important histological and radiological features of gliosarcoma in the light of recent literature, and also touches upon the treatment options and outcomes of various types of gliosarcoma.

Clinical and molecular characteristics of gliosarcoma and modern prognostic significance relative to conventional glioblastoma.

Gliosarcoma is a rare histopathologic variant of glioblastoma traditionally associated with a poor prognosis. While gliosarcoma may represent a distinct clinical entity given its unique histologic composition and molecular features, its relative prognostic significance remains uncertain. While treatment of gliosarcoma generally encompasses the same standardized approach used in glioblastoma, supporting evidence is limited given its rarity. Here, we characterized 32 cases of gliosarcoma and retrospectively evaluated survival relative to 451 glioblastoma patients diagnosed during the same era within the same institution. Overall, we identified 22 primary gliosarcomas, representing 4.7% of WHO Grade IV primary glioblastomas, and 10 secondary gliosarcomas. With median age of 62, patients were predominately Caucasian (87.5%) and male (65.6%). Tumors with available molecular profiling were primarily MGMT-unmethylated (87.5%), IDH-1-preserved (100%) and EGFR wild-type (100%). Interestingly, while no significant median survival difference between primary gliosarcoma and glioblastoma was observed across the entire cohort (11.0 vs. 14.8 months, p = 0.269), median survival was worse for gliosarcoma specifically among patients who received modern temozolomide-based (TMZ) chemoradiotherapy (11.0 vs. 17.3 months, p = 0.006). Matched-pair analysis also trended toward worse median survival among gliosarcomas (11.0 vs. 19.6 months, log-rank p = 0.177, Breslow p = 0.010). While adjuvant radiotherapy (HR 0.206, p = 0.035) and TMZ-based chemotherapy (HR 0.531, p = 0.000) appeared protective, gliosarcoma emerged as a significantly poor prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (HR 3.27, p = 0.012). Collectively, our results suggest that gliosarcoma may still portend worse prognosis even with modern trimodality therapy.

[Primary cerebral gliosarcoma: about two cases and review of the literature]. / Gliosarcome cérébral primitif: à propos de deux cas et revue de la littérature.

Gliosarcoma is a very rare brain tumor accounting for 1.8 -8% of all glial tumors. It has been classified by the World Health Organization as a variant of glioblastoma. It is a tumor with double glial and sarcomatous component. Patient's clinical picture is polymorphic, imaging data are evocative, diagnosis is based on histology. Treatment is always surgical. Prognosis is closely linked to the quality of resection. We here report two clinical cases with the aim of assessing the diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic features of this rare entity.

Gliosarcomas with the BRAF V600E mutation: a report of two cases and review of the literature.

Gliosarcoma, which is regarded as a variant of glioblastoma, is a rare malignant neoplasm of the central nervous system. Both its sarcomatous component and glial component are reported to share significant clinical and genetic similarities. However, gliosarcomas are considered to be characterised by a lack of the BRAF V600E mutation. Here, we report two cases of gliosarcoma harbouring the BRAF V600E mutation, of which one case appears to have arisen de novo, while the other likely arose from ganglioglioma. Interestingly, the BRAF V600E mutation was detected only in the glial component in the first case, but was present in both the glial and the sarcomatous components in the recurrent gliosarcoma. Furthermore, the different mutation state of BRAF V600E in our two cases suggests that the malignant transformation of gliosarcoma might have different underlying genetic alterations and mechanisms in de novo versus recurrent gliosarcoma.

Gliosarcoma in septuagenarians and octogenarians: What is the impact of adjuvant chemoradiation?

The objective of our study is to determine the impact of adjuvant chemoradiation on overall survival (OS) for gliosarcoma in septuagenarians and octogenarians. Data were extracted from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression models were employed in SPSS 23.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) for data analyses. 210 patients with gliosarcoma who underwent resection were identified. 168 (80.0%) patients received adjuvant chemoradiation, and 42 (20.0%) received adjuvant RT alone. Patients were more likely to receive adjuvant chemoradiation if they were male vs. female (85.3% vs. 71.6%, p=0.016). There was no significant difference in receipt of adjuvant therapy by year of diagnosis, age at diagnosis, race, Charlson/Deyo Score, treatment facility type, tumor size, or extent of surgery. Those who received adjuvant chemoradiation had significantly better one-year OS than those who received adjuvant radiation alone (35.3% vs. 16.2%, p<0.001). On subset analysis, this significant one-year OS benefit was observed in septuagenarians, those with Charlson/Deyo Score of 0, and in those with tumor size ≤5cm. On multivariate analysis, receipt of adjuvant chemoradiation and greater extent of resection were independent prognostic factors for improved OS. Our data suggests that adjuvant chemoradiation is an independent prognostic factor for improved OS in elderly patients with gliosarcoma, and the results of our study can serve as estimated benchmarks for outcome in this growing and important patient population. Its benefit, however, may be limited to septuagenarians and those with lower comorbidity burden.