Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 79
Filter
1.
Dis Aquat Organ ; 158: 173-178, 2024 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38813857

ABSTRACT

Working with aquatic organisms often requires handling multiple individuals in a single session, potentially resulting in cross-contamination by live pathogens or DNA. Most researchers address this problem by disposing of gloves between animals. However, this generates excessive waste and may be impractical for processing very slippery animals that might be easier to handle with cotton gloves. We tested methods to decontaminate cotton or nitrile gloves after contamination with cultured Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) or after handling heavily Bd-infected Xenopus laevis with layered cotton and nitrile gloves. Bleach eliminated detectable Bd DNA from culture-contaminated nitrile gloves, but gloves retained detectable Bd DNA following ethanol disinfection. After handling a Bd-infected frog, Bd DNA contamination was greatly reduced by removal of the outer cotton glove, after which either bleach decontamination or ethanol decontamination followed by drying hands with a paper towel lowered Bd DNA below the detection threshold of our assay. These results provide new options to prevent pathogen or DNA cross-contamination, especially when handling slippery aquatic organisms. However, tradeoffs should be considered when selecting an animal handling procedure, such as the potential for cotton gloves to abrade amphibian skin or disrupt skin mucus. Disposing of gloves between animals should remain the gold standard for maintaining biosecurity in sensitive situations.


Subject(s)
Decontamination , Gloves, Protective , Animals , Decontamination/methods , Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Batrachochytrium , DNA, Fungal , Mycoses/veterinary , Mycoses/prevention & control , Mycoses/microbiology
2.
J Food Prot ; 86(11): 100146, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37619692

ABSTRACT

Hand hygiene is critical in the food service industry. Bacteria can easily be transferred between different surfaces to food during food preparation. Common hygiene practices include hand washing and usage of disposable gloves. Food handlers are often susceptible to transferring pathogenic bacteria to food, thus proper hand hygiene can limit such transmission. While gloves serve as a barrier between bare hands and food, their misuse, including reuse or lack of change, can potentially result in cross-contamination, compromising on food safety. In Singapore, strict regulations and consumer perceptions have encouraged the use of gloves in food handling. This study assessed the microbiological profile of gloves used by food handlers across fifty randomly chosen food establishments, by swabbing samples from the inner and outer surfaces of gloves. Glove samples were also subjected to a watertight test to detect significant physical damage. The results revealed that gloves with damage exhibited significantly higher mean Standard Plate Counts (SPCs), suggesting the likelihood that damaged gloves promoted the transfer of bacteria. Damaged gloves used to handle certain types of food, like noodles and rice dishes, also had significantly higher mean SPC than those used for beverages and snacks. However, gloves without visible damage showed no significant difference in mean SPC across different food types. The study highlighted that proper glove use can help in preventing bacterial transfer and consequently, maintaining food safety. Regular glove changes, particularly when damaged, are imperative. The findings underscore the importance of proper glove use in conjunction with other hand hygiene practices to uphold food hygiene and safety standards.


Subject(s)
Food Services , Hand Hygiene , Food Handling/methods , Food Safety , Hygiene , Gloves, Protective/microbiology
3.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 17(11-12): 523-530, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33206026

ABSTRACT

The organic material present on waste sorting units serve as a substrate for different microorganisms, increasing workers' exposure to Aspergillus spp. This study intends to assess the Aspergillus spp. contamination on Mechanical Protection Gloves (MPG) from different workstations and understand the role of MPG in workers' exposure to these genera. Sixty-seven used MPG were collected from different workstations and extracts were seeded on malt extract agar (MEA) supplemented with chloramphenicol (0.05%) and dichloran glycerol (DG18). The same extracts were used for the molecular detection of fungal species/strains, with reported toxigenic potential, namely Aspergillus sections (Circumdati, Flavi, Fumigati, and Nidulantes). Among Aspergillus spp., the sections with the highest prevalence on MEA were Nigri (88.29%) and Fumigati (8.63%), whereas on DG18 were Nigri (31.79%) and Circumdati (30.77%). Aspergillus section Circumdati was detected in 22 MPG samples by RT-PCR (32.84%), Fumigati in 59 samples (88.06%), Nidulantes in 61 samples (91.05%), and Flavi in 6 samples (8.96%). It was showed that, even with daily replacement, MPG presented Aspergillus spp. contamination. Thus, a more regular replacement of MPG and the adoption of complementary hygienic procedures by workers are critical to guarantee workers' protection in this occupational environment.


Subject(s)
Aspergillus/isolation & purification , Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Waste Disposal Facilities , Aspergillus/classification , Humans , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Portugal
4.
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes ; 6(1): 26, 2020 07 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32651393

ABSTRACT

Microbial food spoilage is responsible for a considerable amount of waste and can cause food-borne diseases in humans, particularly in immunocompromised individuals and children. Therefore, preventing microbial food spoilage is a major concern for health authorities, regulators, consumers, and the food industry. However, the contamination of food products is difficult to control because there are several potential sources during production, processing, storage, distribution, and consumption, where microorganisms come in contact with the product. Here, we use high-throughput full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing to provide insights into bacterial community structure throughout a pork-processing plant. Specifically, we investigated what proportion of bacteria on meat are presumptively not animal-associated and are therefore transferred during cutting via personnel, equipment, machines, or the slaughter environment. We then created a facility-specific transmission map of bacterial flow, which predicted previously unknown sources of bacterial contamination. This allowed us to pinpoint specific taxa to particular environmental sources and provide the facility with essential information for targeted disinfection. For example, Moraxella spp., a prominent meat spoilage organism, which was one of the most abundant amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) detected on the meat, was most likely transferred from the gloves of employees, a railing at the classification step, and the polishing tunnel whips. Our results suggest that high-throughput full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing has great potential in food monitoring applications.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/classification , Food Contamination/analysis , Gloves, Protective/microbiology , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Animals , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Ribosomal/genetics , Food Handling , Food Microbiology , Food-Processing Industry , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Phylogeny , Swine
5.
Indoor Air ; 30(5): 993-1004, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32329918

ABSTRACT

Bacterial transmission from contaminated surfaces via hand contact plays a critical role in disease spread. However, the fomite-to-finger transfer efficiency of microorganisms during multiple sequential surface contacts with and without gloves has not been formerly investigated. We measured the quantity of Escherichia coli on fingertips of participants after 1-8 sequential contacts with inoculated plastic coupons with and without nitrile gloves. A Bayesian approach was used to develop a mechanistic model of pathogen accretion to examine finger loading as a function of the difference between E coli on surfaces and fingers. We used the model to determine the coefficient of transfer efficiency (λ), and influence of swabbing efficiency and finger area. Results showed that λ for bare skin was higher (49%, 95% CI = 32%-72%) than for gloved hands (30%, CI = 17%-49%). Microbial load tended toward a dynamic equilibrium after four and six contacts for gloved hands and bare skin, respectively. Individual differences between volunteers' hands had a negligible effect compared with use of gloves (P < .01). Gloves reduced loading by 4.7% (CI = -12%-21%) over bare skin contacts, while 20% of participants accrued more microorganisms on gloved hands. This was due to poor fitting, which created a larger finger surface area than bare hands.


Subject(s)
Bacteria , Fomites/microbiology , Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Hand/microbiology , Hand Disinfection , Humans
6.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 41(5): 601-603, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32036800

ABSTRACT

The transmission rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) to gloves or gowns of healthcare personnel (HCP) caring for MRSA patients in a non-intensive care unit setting was 5.4%. Contamination rates were higher among HCP performing direct patient care and when patients had detectable MRSA on their body. These findings may inform risk-based contact precautions.


Subject(s)
Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections/transmission , Surgical Attire/microbiology , Cross Infection , Health Personnel , Humans , Personal Protective Equipment/microbiology , Prospective Studies
7.
Food Microbiol ; 88: 103396, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31997755

ABSTRACT

The common use of gloves in retail practices represents a potential route for cross contamination of foodborne pathogens in fresh-cut produce. Using fresh-cut cantaloupe as a food model, we investigated factors that may influence glove-mediated cross contamination by Listeria monocytogenes and developed mathematical models to illustrate the patterns of transfer during fresh-cutting practices. Contact time (2, 5, 10 s), contact pressure (0.05, 0.18, 0.37 psi), and glove type (nitrile, polyvinyl chloride, polyethylene) did not have a significant effect on transfer of L. monocytogenes from cantaloupe rind to flesh, or from flesh to flesh. However, glove type appeared to affect L. monocytogenes transfer from the stem scar tissue to cantaloupe flesh (P = 0.0371). Transfer from rind pieces that had been washed with water was significantly higher than transfer from pieces that had not been washed (P = 0.0006). Predictive modeling and experimental validation suggested that transfer of L. monocytogenes on cantaloupe flesh persists over 85 pieces through consecutive contacts with a gloved hand. Findings of the study provide new scientific data to aid researchers, retailers, and caterers in safety risk assessments of fresh-cut practices used to prepare cantaloupes and other produce items.


Subject(s)
Cucumis melo/microbiology , Food Contamination , Food Microbiology , Fruit/microbiology , Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Listeria monocytogenes/isolation & purification , Colony Count, Microbial , Food Handling , Listeria monocytogenes/growth & development , Models, Theoretical , Temperature , Water
8.
Med Mycol ; 58(1): 128-132, 2020 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31032857

ABSTRACT

Candida auris' ability to persist on contaminated gloves and transmit to urinary catheters was evaluated. 105 and 103 cfu/ml suspensions of eight Candida species including C. auris were inoculated on latex and nitrile gloves fingertips and touched on agar surface at different time intervals. Urinary catheter piece, touched by latex glove carrying Candida spp. suspensions at various time intervals, was cultured by roll-plate method. C.auris persisted on latex gloves at both 105 and 103 cfu/ml up to 3 minutes and could be transmitted from both wet and dry contaminated gloves to catheters. Proper glove use with strict hand hygiene should be advocated in settings with ongoing C.auris transmission.


Subject(s)
Candida/isolation & purification , Candidiasis/transmission , Equipment Contamination , Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Urinary Catheters/microbiology , Humans , Latex , Nitriles
9.
Clin Infect Dis ; 69(Suppl 3): S171-S177, 2019 09 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31517979

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Healthcare personnel (HCP) acquire antibiotic-resistant bacteria on their gloves and gowns when caring for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Yet, contact precautions for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains controversial despite existing guidelines. We sought to understand which patients are more likely to transfer MRSA to HCP and to identify which HCP interactions are more likely to lead to glove or gown contamination. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter cohort study of cultured HCP gloves and gowns for MRSA. Samples were obtained from patients' anterior nares, perianal area, and skin of the chest and arm to assess bacterial burden. RESULTS: Among 402 MRSA-colonized patients with 3982 interactions, we found that HCP gloves and gowns were contaminated with MRSA 14.3% and 5.9% of the time, respectively. Contamination of either gloves or gowns occurred in 16.2% of interactions. Contamination was highest among occupational/physical therapists (odds ratio [OR], 6.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.51, 13.79), respiratory therapists (OR, 5.34; 95% CI, 3.04, 9.39), and when any HCP touched the patient (OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.04, 6.51). Touching the endotracheal tube (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.38, 2.19), bedding (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.20, 1.70), and bathing (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.01, 1.75) increased the odds of contamination. We found an association between increasing bacterial burden on the patient and HCP glove or gown contamination. CONCLUSIONS: Gloves and gowns are frequently contaminated with MRSA in the ICU. Hospitals may consider using fewer precautions for low-risk interactions and more for high-risk interactions and personnel.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Health Personnel/education , Infection Control/methods , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Staphylococcal Infections/transmission , Anal Canal/microbiology , Bacterial Load/statistics & numerical data , Cross Infection/microbiology , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Humans , Infection Control/instrumentation , Intensive Care Units , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Nose/microbiology , Patients , Prospective Studies , Protective Clothing/microbiology , Skin/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control
10.
Food Microbiol ; 84: 103256, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31421788

ABSTRACT

Cronobacter spp. are opportunistic pathogens that must be controlled in infant powder manufacturing plants. This study evaluated the spread of Cronobacter cells via contact surfaces within a dairy manufacturing environment. Transfer rates of Cronobacter spp. were determined from vectors for transmission including moveable fomites (e.g. trolley wheels and boots) and gloved hands to various types of recipient surfaces (stainless steel, linoleum and resin-coated concrete) typical for dairy manufacturing environments. Overall, with a starting inoculum of 106 CFU/mL, approximately 104 CFU/mL Cronobacter cells were transferred from each fomite onto each recipient surface during the initial transfer event. Gloved hands transferred the highest number of Cronobacter cells, followed by polyvinylchloride boots and then polyurethane trolley wheels. We demonstrate, using a combination of experimental data and uncertainty analysis, that if a movable fomite (boots or trolley wheels), or gloves became contaminated, Cronobacter could be spread over a wide area within a manufacturing plant. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first quantitative estimation of the spread of Cronobacter within a dairy manufacturing plant, that can also be practically applied as a tool for providing information in making risk management decisions. In particular, the estimation of spread suggests areas for cleaning and sanitation within a dairy manufacturing environment during a contamination event.


Subject(s)
Cronobacter/isolation & purification , Dairying/instrumentation , Equipment Contamination , Floors and Floorcoverings , Fomites/microbiology , Food Contamination/analysis , Consumer Product Safety , Dairying/standards , Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Stainless Steel , Touch
11.
Am J Infect Control ; 47(10): 1171-1175, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31153711

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several observational studies suggest that gloves of health care workers are major routes of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii transmission. However, limited experimental data are available assessing Acinetobacter transmission from gloves to environmental surfaces. This study determined whether A baumannii was easily transferred from nitrile gloves to polypropylene plastic compared with other gram-negative bacteria that cause health care-associated infections in laboratory-controlled experiments. METHODS: Gloved fingerpad-to-fomite transfer efficiency was determined for drug-resistant and -sensitive strains of A baumannii, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. RESULTS: Only A baumannii transferred from gloves to fomites 3 minutes after the bacterial transfer event. Transfer efficiency of A baumannii was 0.1%-33% at that time point. DISCUSSION: Bacterial transfer from contaminated gloves to the hospital environment may be related to the type of contaminating bacteria, inoculated bacterial level, fomites, and glove materials. Therefore, it is important to need a comprehensive assessment of the transfer efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: A baumannii can transfer easily from nitrile gloves to fomite compared with other gram-negative bacteria that cause health care-associated infections. These findings support data from previous observational studies that gloves of health care workers can be major routes of A baumannii transmission in clinical settings.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections/transmission , Acinetobacter baumannii/pathogenicity , Cross Infection/transmission , Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Acinetobacter Infections/microbiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/physiology , Fomites/microbiology , Hospitals , Humans , Nitriles , Plastics , Polypropylenes
12.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 40(1): 60-64, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30421690

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pathogens can survive for extended periods when incorporated into biofilm on dry hospital surfaces (ie, dry-surface biofilm, DSB). Bacteria within biofilm are protected from desiccation and have increased tolerance to cleaning agents and disinfectants. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that gloved hands of healthcare personnel (HCP) become contaminated with DSB bacteria and hence may transmit bacteria associated with healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). METHOD: Staphylococcus aureus DSB was grown in vitro on coupons in a bioreactor over 12 days with periodic nutrition interspersed with long periods of dehydration. Each coupon had ~107 DSB bacterial cells. Transmission was tested with nitrile, latex, and surgical gloves by gripping DSB-covered coupons then pressing finger tips onto a sterile horse blood agar surface for up to 19 consecutive touches and counting the number of colony-forming units (CFU) transferred. Coupons were immersed in 5% neutral detergent to simulate cleaning, and the experiment was repeated. RESULTS: Bacterial cells were readily transmitted by all 3 types of gloves commonly used by HCP. Surprisingly, sufficient S. aureus to cause infection were transferred from 1 DSB touch up to 19 consecutive touches. Also, 6 times more bacteria were transferred by nitrile and surgical gloves than to latex gloves (P <.001). Treating the DSB with 5% neutral detergent increased the transmission rate of DSB bacteria 10-fold. CONCLUSION: Staphylococcus aureus incorporated into environmental DSB and covered by extracellular polymeric substances readily contaminates gloved hands and can be transferred to another surface. These results confirm the possibility that DSB contributes to HAI acquisition.


Subject(s)
Biofilms , Fomites/microbiology , Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Gloves, Surgical/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Colony Count, Microbial , Detergents/pharmacology , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Environmental Microbiology , Health Personnel , Humans , Surface Properties
13.
J Hosp Infect ; 101(2): 150-157, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30529506

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Following the alarming outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia (CRKP) in five intensive care units (ICUs) of a tertiary care hospital in China, a prospective investigation of CRKP colonized/infected patients was conducted. AIM: To describe the diffusion and transmission of CRKP among epidemiologically linked ICU patients, staff and environment. METHODS: Enhanced CRKP infected/colonized case monitoring was performed by the real-time nosocomial infection surveillance system (RT-NISS). The immediate surroundings of each CRKP patient bed unit and the staff hands/gloves/gowns were sampled and then evaluated for the presence of CRKP. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) were used to identify and to characterize these isolates. FINDINGS: Among 2750 patients monitored, 67 CRKP patients were newly labeled and 11 patients' CRKP isolates were available. A total of 31.34% (21/67) bed units were positive at one or more surrounding surfaces, 7.99% (49/613) environmental samples and 3.57% (4/112) ICU staff samples were CRKP positive. The selected CRKP isolates (N = 64) exhibited intermediate to high resistance levels to the antibiotics tested apart from colistin and tigecycline. RT-NISS data combined with MLST and PFGE revealed nine likely transmission clusters. WGS analysis of these CRKP isolates revealed extensive sharing of multiple antimicrobial resistance genes and plasmid replicons among these isolates. Two carbapenemase genes blaKPC-2 (62/64) and blaOXA-48 (2/64) were identified. These CRKP isolates carried one or more plasmid replicons. CONCLUSIONS: The contamination of ICU environment and staff's hands, gloves or gowns is frequent with CRKP patients. Our study also supports the hypothesis that an association between environmental contamination and transmission of CRKP bacteria in ICUs.


Subject(s)
Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Disease Transmission, Infectious , Environmental Microbiology , Klebsiella Infections/epidemiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Beijing/epidemiology , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/classification , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/genetics , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/transmission , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Hand/microbiology , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Klebsiella Infections/transmission , Klebsiella pneumoniae/classification , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Molecular Typing , Plasmids/analysis , Prospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Whole Genome Sequencing
14.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 39(12): 1425-1430, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30293533

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of transmission of antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (RGNB) to gowns and gloves worn by healthcare personnel (HCP) when providing care to residents of community-based nursing facilities to identify the types of care and resident characteristics associated with transmission. DESIGN: Prospective observational study.Settings and participantsResidents and HCP from 13 community-based nursing facilities in Maryland and Michigan. METHODS: Perianal swabs were collected from residents and cultured to detect RGNB. HCP wore gowns and gloves during usual care activities, and at the end of each interaction, these were swabbed in a standardized manner. Transmission of RGNB from a colonized resident to gowns and gloves was estimated. Odds ratios (ORs) of transmission associated with type of care or resident characteristic were calculated. RESULTS: We enrolled 403 residents and their HCP in this study. Overall, 19% of enrolled residents with a perianal swab (n=399) were colonized with at least 1 RGNB. RGNB transmission to either gloves or gowns occurred during 11% of the 584 interactions. Showering the resident, hygiene or toilet assistance, and wound dressing changes were associated with a high risk of transmission. Glucose monitoring and assistance with feeding or medication were associated with a low risk of transmission. Residents with a pressure ulcer were 3 times more likely to transmit RGNB than residents without one (OR, 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-11.1). CONCLUSIONS: Gown and glove use in community nursing facilities should be prioritized for certain residents and care interactions that are deemed a high risk for transmission.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/transmission , Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/transmission , Nursing Homes , Protective Clothing/microbiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Female , Gram-Negative Bacteria/growth & development , Health Personnel , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Maryland , Michigan , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
15.
BMC Infect Dis ; 18(1): 466, 2018 Sep 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30223772

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To prevent cross infection the surgical team perform preoperative hand disinfection before dressed in surgical gowns and gloves. Preoperative hand disinfection does not make hands sterile and the surgical glove cuff end has been regarded as a weak link, since it is not a liquid-proof interface. The aims were to investigate if there were differences in bacterial growth and recolonization of hands between operating room nurses and non-health care workers as well as to investigate if bacterial growth existed at the surgical glove cuff end during surgery. METHODS: This pilot project was conducted as an exploratory comparative clinical trial. Bacterial cultures were taken from the glove and gown interface and at three sites of the hands of 12 operating room nurses and 13 non-health care workers controls directly after preoperative hand disinfection and again after wearing surgical gloves and gowns. Colony forming units were analysed with Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon Sign Ranks test comparing repeated measurements. Categorical variables were evaluated with chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Operating room nurses compared to non-health care workers had significant higher bacterial growth at two of three culture sites after surgical hand disinfection. Both groups had higher recolonization at one of the three culture sites after wearing surgical gloves. There were no differences between the groups in total colony forming units, that is, all sampling sites. Five out of 12 of the operating room nurses had bacterial growth at the glove cuff end and of those, four had the same bacteria at the glove cuff end as found in the cultures from the hands. Bacteria isolated from the glove cuff were P. acnes, S. warneri, S. epidermidis and Micrococcus species, the CFU/mL ranged from 10 to 40. CONCLUSIONS: There were differences in bacterial growth and re-colonization between the groups but this was inconclusive. However, bacterial growth exists at the glove cuff and gown interface, further investigation in larger study is needed, to build on these promising, but preliminary, findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration was performed prospectively at Research web (FOU in Sweden, 117,971) 14/01/2013, and retrospectively at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02359708 ). 01/27/2015.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/growth & development , Hand Disinfection , Hand/microbiology , Nurses , Operating Rooms , Adult , Bacteria/cytology , Colony Count, Microbial , Control Groups , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Female , Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Gloves, Surgical/microbiology , Hand Disinfection/standards , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Preoperative Period , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Sweden , Workforce
16.
Braz. j. microbiol ; 49(3): 481-488, July-Sept. 2018. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-951816

ABSTRACT

Abstract An increasing production of natural rubber (NR) products has led to major challenges in waste management. In this study, the degradation of rubber latex gloves in a mineral salt medium (MSM) using a bacterial consortium, a mixed culture of the selected bacteria and a pure culture were studied. The highest 18% weight loss of the rubber gloves were detected after incubated with the mixed culture. The increased viable cell counts over incubation time indicated that cells used rubber gloves as sole carbon source leading to the degradation of the polymer. The growth behavior of NR-degrading bacteria on the latex gloves surface was investigated using the scanning electron microscope (SEM). The occurrence of the aldehyde groups in the degradation products was observed by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy analysis. Rhodococcus pyridinivorans strain F5 gave the highest weight loss of rubber gloves among the isolated strain and posses latex clearing protein encoded by lcp gene. The mixed culture of the selected strains showed the potential in degrading rubber within 30 days and is considered to be used efficiently for rubber product degradation. This is the first report to demonstrate a strong ability to degrade rubber by Rhodococcus pyridinivorans.


Subject(s)
Rubber/metabolism , Soil Microbiology , Rhodococcus/isolation & purification , Rhodococcus/metabolism , Latex/metabolism , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/metabolism , Biodegradation, Environmental , Rhodococcus/classification , Rhodococcus/genetics , Gloves, Protective/microbiology
17.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 39(9): 1063-1067, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30051793

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine which healthcare worker (HCW) roles and patient care activities are associated with acquisition of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) on HCW gloves or gowns after patient care, as a surrogate for transmission to other patients. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Medical and surgical intensive care units at a tertiary-care academic institution.ParticipantsVRE-colonized patients on Contact Precautions and their HCWs. METHODS: Overall, 94 VRE-colonized patients and 469 HCW-patient interactions were observed. Research staff recorded patient care activities and cultured HCW gloves and gowns for VRE before doffing and exiting patient room. RESULTS: VRE were isolated from 71 of 469 HCWs' gloves or gowns (15%) following patient care. Occupational/physical therapists, patient care technicians, nurses, and physicians were more likely than environmental services workers and other HCWs to have contaminated gloves or gowns. Compared to touching the environment alone, the odds ratio (OR) for VRE contamination associated with touching both the patient (or objects in the immediate vicinity of the patient) and environment was 2.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-0.77) and the OR associated with touching only the patient (or objects in the immediate vicinity) was 3.65 (95% CI, 1.17-11.41). Independent risk factors for transmission of VRE to HCWs were touching the patient's skin (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.15-4.13) and transferring the patient into or out of bed (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.15-6.43). CONCLUSION: Patient contact is a major risk factor for HCW contamination and subsequent transmission. Interventions should prioritize contact precautions and hand hygiene for HCWs whose activities involve touching the patient.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/transmission , Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/transmission , Protective Clothing/microbiology , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci/isolation & purification , Aged , Equipment Contamination , Female , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Intensive Care Units , Logistic Models , Male , Maryland , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Vancomycin Resistance
18.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 39(9): 1093-1107, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30039774

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The transfer of pathogens may spread antimicrobial resistance and lead to healthcare-acquired infections. We performed a systematic literature review to generate estimates of pathogen transfer in relation to healthcare provider (HCP) activities. METHODS: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, Medline/Ovid, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published before July 7, 2017. We reviewed the literature, examining transfer of pathogens associated with HCP activities. We included studies that (1) quantified transfer of pathogens from a defined origin to a defined destination surface; (2) reported a microbiological sampling technique; and (3) described the associated activity leading to transfer. For studies reporting transfer frequencies, we extracted data and calculated the estimated proportion using Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation and the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. RESULTS: Of 13,121 identified articles, 32 were included. Most articles (n=27, 84%) examined transfer from patients and their environment to HCP hands, gloves, and gowns, with an estimated proportion for transfer frequency of 33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12%-57%), 30% (95% CI, 23%-38%) and 10% (95% CI, 6%-14%), respectively. Other articles addressed transfer involving the hospital environment and medical devices. Risk factor analyses in 12 studies suggested higher transfer frequencies after contact with moist body sites (n=7), longer duration of care (n=5), and care of patients with an invasive device (n=3). CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing the heterogeneity in study designs, the available evidence suggests that pathogen transfer to HCPs occurs frequently. More systematic research is urgently warranted to support targeted and economic prevention policies and interventions.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/transmission , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/statistics & numerical data , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/statistics & numerical data , Equipment Contamination , Equipment and Supplies/microbiology , Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Hand/microbiology , Humans , Protective Clothing/microbiology
20.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 39(3): 272-279, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29498339

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE In this study, we sought to establish a comprehensive inventory of infectious risk moments (IRMs), defined as seemingly innocuous yet frequently occurring care manipulations potentially resulting in transfer of pathogens to patients. We also aimed to develop and employ an observational taxonomy to quantify the frequency and nature of IRMs in acute-care settings. DESIGN Prospective observational study and establishment of observational taxonomy. SETTING Intensive care unit, general medical ward, and emergency ward of a university-affiliated hospital. PARTICIPANTS Healthcare workers (HCWs) METHODS Exploratory observations were conducted to identify IRMs, which were coded based on the surfaces involved in the transmission pathway to establish a structured taxonomy. Structured observations were performed using this taxonomy to quantify IRMs in all 3 settings. RESULTS Following 129.17 hours of exploratory observations, identified IRMs involved HCW hands, gloves, care devices, mobile objects, and HCW clothing and accessories. A structured taxonomy called INFORM (INFectiOus Risk Moment) was established to classify each IRM according to the source, vector, and endpoint of potential pathogen transfer. We observed 1,138 IRMs during 53.77 hours of structured observations (31.25 active care hours) for an average foundation of 42.8 IRMs per active care hour overall, and average densities of 34.9, 36.8, and 56.3 IRMs in the intensive care, medical, and emergency wards, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Hands and gloves remain among the most important contributors to the transfer of pathogens within the healthcare setting, but medical devices, mobile objects, invasive devices, and HCW clothing and accessories may also contribute to patient colonization and/or infection. The INFORM observational taxonomy and IRM inventory presented may benefit clinical risk assessment, training and education, and future research. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:272-279.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/classification , Cross Infection/transmission , Risk Assessment/methods , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disinfection , Emergency Service, Hospital , Equipment Contamination , Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Hand/microbiology , Health Personnel , Hospitals, University , Humans , Infection Control , Intensive Care Units , Patients' Rooms , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...