Femoral Fracture in Primary Soft-Tissue Sarcoma of the Thigh and Groin Treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: Observed versus Expected Risk.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare the observed risk of femoral fracture in primary soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) of the thigh/groin treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to expected risk calculated using the Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH) nomogram. METHODS: Expected femoral fracture risk was calculated by using the PMH nomogram. Cumulative risk of fracture was estimated by using Kaplan-Meier statistics. Prognostic factors were assessed with univariate and multivariate analysis using Cox's stepwise regression. RESULTS: Between February 2002 and December 2010, 92 consecutive eligible patients were assessed. Median follow-up was 73 months (106 months in surviving patients). IMRT was delivered preoperatively (50 Gy) in 13 (14%) patients and postoperatively in 79 (86%) patients (median dose, 63 Gy; range, 59.4-66.6 Gy). The observed crude risk of fractures was 6.5% compared with 25.6% expected risk from the nomogram; the cumulative risk of fracture using IMRT at 5 years was 6.7% (95% CI 2.8-16.0%). The median time to fracture was 23 months (range, 6.9-88.6). Significant predictors of fracture on univariate analysis were age ≥ 60 years (p = 0.03), tumor location in the anterior thigh (p = 0.008), and periosteal stripping to > 20 cm (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, age ≥ 60 years and periosteal stripping > 20 cm retained significance (p = 0.04 and p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the cumulative risk of femur fracture in patients treated with IMRT (6.7%) is less than the expected risk using the PMH nomogram (25.6%). Established predictors of femur fracture, such as gender, tumor size, and dose of RT, seem to have less impact on fracture risk when using IMRT.

Elevated Radiation Exposure Associated With Above Surface Flat Detector Mini C-Arm Use.

Background: This study aims to test the hypothesis that: (1) radiation exposure is increased with the intended use of Flat Surface Image Intensifier (FSII) units above the operative surface compared with the traditional below-table configuration; (2) this differential increases in a dose-dependent manner; and (3) radiation exposure varies with body part and proximity to the radiation source. Methods: A surgeon mannequin was seated at a radiolucent hand table, positioned for volar distal radius plating. Thermoluminescent dosimeters measured exposure to the eyes, thyroid, chest, hand, and groin, for 1- and 15-minute trials from a mini C-arm FSII unit positioned above and below the operating surface. Background radiation was measured by control dosimeters placed within the operating theater. Results: At 1-minute of exposure, hand and eye dosages were significantly greater with the flat detector positioned above the table. At 15-minutes of exposure, hand radiation dosage exceeded that of all other anatomic sites with the FSII in both positions. Hand exposure was increased in a dose-dependent manner with the flat detector in either position, whereas groin exposure saw a dose-dependent only with the flat detector beneath the operating table. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the surgeon's hands and eyes may incur greater radiation exposure compared with other body parts, during routine mini C-arm FSII utilization in its intended position above the operating table. The clinical impact of these findings remains unclear, and future long-term radiation safety investigation is warranted. Surgeons should take precautions to protect critical body parts, particularly when using FSII technology above the operating with prolonged exposure time.

T1-2 anal carcinoma requires elective inguinal radiation treatment--the results of Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group study TROG 99.02.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Elective inguinal irradiation increases morbidity. We describe outcomes of moderate intensity chemoradiation treating anal canal and adjacent pelvic nodes only. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty patients with T1-2, N0 anal carcinoma were enrolled between March 1999 and March 2003. Inguinal nodes were NOT electively irradiated. The anal canal and regional pelvic nodes received 36 Gy/20# over 4 weeks, and 2 weeks later the anal canal was boosted with 14.4 Gy/8#. Chemotherapy was 5 fluorouracil 800 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-4 and 36-39, and Mitomycin C 10mg/m(2) on day 1. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 44 months. Complete response was 95%. Four year results were; overall survival 71%, local control 82%, and colostomy-free survival (including salvage) 85%. Inguinal failure occurred in 22.5% but was isolated in only 12.5%. Treatment was well tolerated acutely with no toxic deaths. Severe late toxicity occurred in 7.5%. CONCLUSIONS: This moderate dose 'non inguinal' chemoradiation regimen resulted in modest acute toxicity, minimal long term morbidity and local control in line with other series. However staging failed to identify 12.5% of patients whose isolated inguinal failure might have been prevented by elective irradiation. Without more effective staging, all patients should receive elective inguinal irradiation.

First report of an ilio-popliteal bypass through the greater sciatic foramen. Case report.

A 47 year-old man, who had a history of pelvic radiotherapy for the treatment of testicular tumour 30 years ago, was referred with minor tissue loss of the right lower extremity, grade III, category 5 of the Rutherford classification. His groin region presented with severe radiation damage. Arteriography demonstrated the occlusion of external iliac and femoral arteries. Revascula-risation was performed in the lateral decubitus position, with a ringed polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft bypass between normal common iliac and popliteal arteries through the greater sciatic foramen. Quick healing was observed. Patient is well 6 months postoperatively. Immediate and 6 month postoperative imaging demonstrated the good patency of the graft. A duplex ultrasound performed 6 month postoperatively showed no significant compression while the patient was in the sitting position.

Prophylactic inguinal-femoral irradiation as an alternative to primary lymphadenectomy in treatment of vulvar carcinoma.

In a complete geographic series of 294 cases of primary vulvar carcinomas prophylactic inguinal-femoral irradiation was used as a standard postoperative therapy. Inguinal lymph node dissection was performed in only 27 cases (9%) and was not part of the standard surgery. The histology was squamous cell carcinoma in 269 cases (92%). The primary surgery was total vulvectomy, partial vulvectomy, or local resection of the tumor. The main type of radiotherapy was adjuvant inguinal irradiation. Two separate, symmetrical and rectangular inguinal fields were irradiated with combined photon and electron beams. In the complete series 127 recurrences (43%) were recorded. Local (24%) and regional recurrences (19%) were most frequent. Type of surgery was not associated with the risk of tumor recurrence. The 5-year overall survival rate was 53% and the relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was 55%. Tumor grade was significantly (P=0.007) associated with the RFS. The inguinal RFS rate was 75% both for patients treated with adjuvant inguinal irradiation without lymphadenectomy and patients treated with primary lymph adenectomy +/- inguinal irradiation. Postoperative complications were recorded in 22%. Postoperative complications occurred most frequently in the subgroup undergoing inguinal lymphadenectomy. Chronic lymph edemas were the most serious late tissue reactions.

Unilateral groin and pelvic irradiation for unilaterally node-positive women with vulval carcinoma.

It is essential that any patient with resected vulval cancer and significant nodal disease receive optimal adjuvant treatment with radiation. Adequate radiotherapy for such patients with unilateral positive groin nodes has not been defined. Whether both groins and pelvic sidewalls should be irradiated or only the affected (node positive) side remains unclear. From our registry, we identified all patients with primary, previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva undergoing bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (superficial and deep nodes) and having unilaterally positive groin nodes treated with unilateral groin and pelvic radiotherapy (44 Gy in 22 fractions). Clinical and pathologic records were reviewed to identify the anatomical site and timing of recurrences in these patients and determine whether unilateral groin and pelvic irradiation was sufficient for disease control on the node-negative side. From 1983 to 2002, 20 patients with unilateral positive nodes treated with unilateral groin and pelvic irradiation were identified. Nineteen patients were classed as having FIGO stage III disease and one as FIGO stage IV due to involvement of the rectal mucosa. There were nine patients with disease recurrences in this group (45%). The disease-free interval ranged from 4 to 31 months (median time to recurrence, 9 months). All nine patients had local or regional failures, the most common site being the ipsilateral groin (six of nine patients). One patient was also found to have distant metastases. There were no recurrences noted in the contralateral (nonirradiated) groin or pelvic sidewall. Recurrence was generally fatal. Eight of the nine patients subsequently died of their disease. The ninth patient died of another cause. There was a high incidence of regional failure after unilateral groin and pelvic radiotherapy, but there were no recurrences on the nonirradiated, node-negative side. Although a small series, we speculate that there is no apparent disadvantage to administering unilateral adjuvant radiotherapy for unilaterally positive groin nodes and encourage further studies in order to more confidently determine whether the tendency observed in our center holds true.

Radiated groin wounds: pitfalls in reconstruction.

Reconstruction procedures of soft tissue defects created after tumor excision in the ilioinguinal region which have received prior radiation therapy are associated with serious morbidities. Despite the availability of muscle or myocutaneous flaps, wound infection, wound breakdown, and necrosis occur with relative frequency. Changes in tissues secondary to radiation therapy are chronic and permanent and adversely affect wound healing. Tumors in this region should be considered for primary excision and reconstruction, followed by radiation, if necessary.

Radioprotective reverse orchidopexy.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: With the improvement in long-term outcome from childhood malignancy, the expected quality of life is important. This study was to assess the value of reverse orchidopexy in patients requiring radiotherapy to the groin or pelvic area. METHODS: The details of 6 boys (age 2 to 13 years) who had malignancy necessitating groin or pelvic radiotherapy were reviewed. Each had reverse orchidopexy of the contralateral testis for the course of the radiotherapy treatment. Brief case summaries are presented. The testis was replaced in the scrotum 4 to 12 months after the reverse orchidopexy. RESULTS: The protected testis continued to grow and was considered normal at 1 to 7 years later. One individual had fathered a child. CONCLUSION: Reverse orchidopexy is a promising method of preserving testicular function in boys who require radiotherapy to the groin or pelvis area.

Reconstruction of complex radiation-induced injuries using free-tissue transfer.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of free-tissue transfers for the reconstruction of radiation-induced complex injuries. The case files for patients who underwent reconstruction for radiation-induced injuries between May 1988 and November 1995 at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty patients in whom 33 free flaps were done were included. Radiation-induced defects were located in the head and neck (n=23), extremities (n=4), chest wall (n=2), and inguinal area (n=1) The mean period between irradiation and injury was 78 months (range: 4 months to 38 years). Free-tissue transfer was successful in 97 percent (32/33) of patients. The overall complication rate was 40 percent (12/30). Flap donor sites included the fibula (n=12), latissimus dorsi (n=6), rectus abdominis (n=6), iliac crest (n=4), scapula (n=3), and radial forearm (n=2). Large-caliber vessels in the cervical, axillary, or inguinal regions were most commonly used to revascularize flaps. Vein grafts were used in five cases for the artery (2/5) or vein (3/5). Pedicle thrombosis occurred in three cases in recipient vessels located within the irradiated field. Two flaps were salvaged; one was lost, and the patient required a second free-flap reconstruction The mean follow-up was 40 months (range: 2.5 to 83 months). The disease-free survival rate was 67 percent (20/30), local failures occurred in 10 percent (3/30) of patients, and 23.3 percent (7/30) of patients either died or were lost to follow-up. Healing of radiation-induced wounds may be achieved using free-tissue transfers, but complications are frequent. Large-caliber irradiated vessels may be used to revascularize flaps, but there may be an increased risk of pedicle thrombosis.

Inguinofemoral radiation of N0,N1 vulvar cancer may be equivalent to lymphadenectomy if proper radiation technique is used.

PURPOSE: To update a previous retrospective study that compared inguinofemoral irradiation (N = 23) to lymphadenectomy (N = 25) for N0,N1 vulvar carcinoma with more patients and longer follow-up. These results, unlike the recent randomized Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG study), suggest that radiation is a viable alternative to groin dissection, and the differences may be explained on the basis of irradiation technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Based on a growing body of data supporting control of subclinical nodal disease with irradiation in vulvar cancer, the decision was made to offer patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva and clinically negative groins (N0,N1), either lymphadenectomy or inguinofemoral irradiation based on clinical factors. Because of the acute skin reaction and possible underdosing of deep femoral nodes with electrons as used in the GOG study, opposed photon fields to 50 Gy were used. From 1983 to 1991, 48 patients underwent a radical vulvectomy followed by either lymphadenectomy (Group I, n = 25) or inguinofemoral irradiation (Group II, n = 23). RESULTS: The actuarial nodal control was 100% in Group I and 91% in Group II (p = 0.14). In addition, there was no difference in cause specific survival at 3 years (96% and 90%, respectively, p = 0.47). The morbidity of lymphadenectomy (Group I) included: 16% lymphedema, 16% seromas, 44% infection, and 68% wound separation. In the irradiated patients (Group II), 16% developed lymphedema and only 9% had a significant skin reaction. CONCLUSION: Based on this analysis of local control and survival with longer follow-up and more patients, irradiation of the N0, N1 inguinofemoral nodes may be a viable alternative to lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva if proper radiation technique and dose are used. In addition, the acute and delayed morbidity of lymphadenectomy exceeds that of irradiation.

Clinical use of a wing field with transmission block for the treatment of the pelvis including the inguinal node.

Treatment planning of photon and electron beams to include the pelvis and the groin poses a technical difficulty of positioning beams, and a dosimetric problem of abutting fields at the groin. We have analyzed a simpler AP/PA method using a central transmission block. The posterior portal is smaller and opposes only the pelvic portion of the anterior portal under the transmission block, while the anterior extended portion (hence the wing) is unattenuated to treat the inguinal region. By calculating the attenuation thickness according to the patient's separation and the beam quality, the dose distribution is tailored to yield the proper dose to the pelvic mid-plane and the inguinal nodes while minimizing the dose to the femora. Measured dose distribution (6MV) using film dosimetry in a tissue-equivalent phantom indicates that a 30% hot spot is created by the posterior portal diverging into the wings of the anterior field. Therefore, the pelvic attenuator is tapered at its lateral edges, thereby significantly reduced the dose inhomogeneity (5%) at the groin. Clinical methods are outlined for the verification of the patient portal films against possible mismatch in beam divergence.