More With Less: Single-Incision Sling Insertion Techniques.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate reproducible procedures for efficient single-incision sling insertion and troubleshooting. DESIGN: Narrated video footage with stepwise demonstration of single-incision sling insertion technique with anchor system. SETTING: The mesh midurethral sling is a highly effective and safe procedure that is considered the gold standard for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Retropubic and transobturator approaches for midurethral slings have similar subjective cure rates with differing surgical risk profiles [1,2]. The retropubic route has a higher risk of injury to the bladder, nerves, and vascular structures, whereas the obturator approach carries a risk of groin or thigh pain [3-5]. Use of a single-incision sling decreases these risks and allows flexibility to perform the procedure without sedation or general anesthesia. Recent literature demonstrates similar subjective and objective success and safety of single-incision slings compared with both retropubic and transobturator approaches, although long-term data are forthcoming [5]. INTERVENTIONS: We demonstrate a stepwise approach for the insertion of a single-incision sling using a helical trocar. Easily reproducible procedures for setup and sling anchor management allow for efficient placement without assistance. In addition, we outline hand positioning, trocar management, and anchor deployment with troubleshooting techniques for potential placement difficulties. Finally, we review methods for sling tensioning to prevent complications such as voiding dysfunction and mesh or suture exposures. CONCLUSION: Given that single-incision slings are more likely to be performed under local anesthesia and are less invasive with decreased recovery time, it has the potential to become the preferred approach in the future. This video demonstrates clear and detailed steps to facilitate successful placement of the single-incision mesh midurethral sling.

Host-biomaterial interactions in mesh complications after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Polypropylene (PPL) mesh is widely used in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery for prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. However, some women, particularly those treated using transvaginal PPL mesh placement for prolapse, experience intractable pain and mesh exposure or extrusion. Explanted tissue from patients with complications following transvaginal implantation of mesh is typified by a dense fibrous capsule with an immune cell-rich infiltrate, suggesting that the host immune response has a role in transvaginal PPL mesh complications through the separate contributions of the host (patient), the biological niche within which the material is implanted and biomaterial properties of the mesh. This immune response might be strongly influenced by both the baseline inflammatory status of the patient, surgical technique and experience, and the unique hormonal, immune and microbial tissue niche of the vagina. Mesh porosity, surface area and stiffness also might have an effect on the immune and tissue response to transvaginal mesh placement. Thus, a regulatory pathway is needed for mesh development that recognizes the roles of host and biological factors in driving the immune response to mesh, as well as mandatory mesh registries and the longitudinal surveillance of patients.

Prolapse Surgery: What Kind of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Is Necessary?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess whether antibiotic prophylaxis or therapy is sufficient for laparoscopic or vaginal prolapse surgery with mesh. METHODS: This is a single-center prospective study. The study was divided into 3 groups. Protocol A: metronidazole (15 mg/kg) and piperacillin-tazobactam (2 g) 1 h before surgery and, for postoperative treatment, gentamycin (160 mg) 1 h before surgery in a single dose. Metronidazole and piperacillin-tazobactam were administered until hospital discharge. Protocol B: gentamycin and piperacillin-tazobactam in the same manner as group A. Protocol C: clindamycin (600 mg) and gentamicin (160 mg) 1 h before surgery in a single dose. RESULTS: We included 87 consecutive patients who underwent prolapse surgery involving mesh prostheses: 57 by the laparoscopic approach and 30 by the vaginal route. Of these, 30 patients were included in protocol A, 30 in protocol B, and 27 in protocol C. There were no statistically significant differences among the 3 protocols regarding any postoperative complications, except for urinary tract infections that were more in the vaginal approach than in the laparoscopic route, in protocol A (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: One-shot prophylaxis can be successfully used in prolapse surgery regardless of the surgical approach.

Comparison Of Operative Complications Of Direct Trocar Access Versus Veress Needle Insertion Technique For Initial Peritoneal Entry In Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is considered to be a good diagnostic and surgical way to replace open surgeries in all surgical fields. As it is a least invasive method, with advantages for patients and all associated with medical care. There is a significant increase in the use of laparoscopic surgery in gynecology. This study was done to compare the frequency of operative complications of direct trocar access versus Veress needle insertion technique for initial peritoneal entry in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: This Randomized Controlled Trial was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore from 26-12-2019 to 25-6-2020. Four hundred consecutive patients were enrolled and divided randomly into two groups by blocked randomization. Direct trocar insertion (DTI) technique was used for initial peritoneal access in group A and Veress needle (VNI) was inserted first for peritoneal access in group B. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients in DTI group was 35.76±8.38 years whereas that in VNI group was 35.85±8.38 years. In DTI group there were 8(4%) patients with extra-peritoneal insufflation and in VNI group there were 19(9.5%) patients with extra-peritoneal insufflation. There were 8(4%) patients in DTI group with Omental injury and VNI group there were 13(6.5%) patients with Omental injury. In DTI group there were 7(3.5%) patients with port-site infection compared to 15(7.5%) in VNI group. CONCLUSIONS: According to findings the rate of complications observed with VNI, DTI can be a preferred procedure for gynecological surgeries.

Female Sexual Function following Sling Surgery: A Prospective Parallel Cohort, Multi-Center Study of the Solyx™ Single Incision Sling System versus the Obtryx™ II Sling System.

PURPOSE: Limited data exist regarding sexual function after single incision sling (SIS) surgery. We compared sexual function 36 months postoperatively between patients undergoing SIS and transobturator sling (TMUS) for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Assessment of sexual function was a planned secondary objective of this prospective, multi-center study that enrolled women to Solyx SIS or Obtryx II TMUS. The primary study aim was to compare efficacy and safety using non-inferiority design at 36 months. Patient-reported outcomes of sexual function were assessed at baseline and 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months using Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Changes in sexual function were analyzed within and between groups. Outcomes for patients requiring surgical retreatment were determined. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were balanced using propensity score stratification (N=141 SIS, N=140 TMUS). Groups were similar in age, body mass index and concomitant surgery performed. Average length of followup was 30 months. Baseline sexual activity was similar (123/141 SIS, 114/140 TMUS, p=0.18). Severity of urinary incontinence did not correlate with baseline sexual activity. Mean PISQ-12 scores increased significantly from baseline to 36 months for both groups, indicating better sexual function at each visit. There were no significant differences in PISQ-12 scores between groups except at 36 months, where the difference was small (-2.5, 95% CI [-4.7, 0.2]). Among patients undergoing surgical retreatment (9/281, 3%), improvement in sexual function was maintained. De novo dyspareunia was rare following both treatments (SIS 1/141, TMUS 0/140, p=1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Patients have significant improvement in sexual function after SIS and TMUS. De novo sexual pain is low after sling surgery.

Symptomatic improvement after mesh removal: a prospective longitudinal study of women with urogynaecological mesh complications.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients undergoing excision of polypropylene urogynaecological mesh for pain, mesh exposure or both. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal cohort. SETTING: Academic tertiary referral centre. POPULATION: Women undergoing complete vaginal mesh excision for mesh exposure and/or pain. METHODS: Clinical and patient-reported outcomes assessing pain (visual analog scale, VAS), bother (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, PFDI) and functional impact (Pelvic Functional Impact Questionnaire, PFIQ) were collected at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months after complete mesh excision. Outcomes were compared by mesh type (sling, prolapse [transvaginal or sacrocolpopexy mesh], both) and complication (pain, exposure, both). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 'Much better' or 'Very much better' on Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) up to 2 years after removal. RESULTS: Of 173 women, 48 underwent removal for pain, 27 for exposure and 98 for exposure plus pain. 'Moderate to severe' baseline symptoms were reported by 75%; the most prevalent and severe symptom was dyspareunia. Patients with pain alone were most bothered (PFDI median 234.2, interquartile range 83, P = 0.02) and had the highest functional impact (PFIQ median 181, interquartile range 138, P < 0.001). After excision, only 33.3% of women with pain alone reported 'improved' symptoms (PGI-I), versus 73.9% with exposure, 58.3% with exposure plus pain (P = 0.03) with no differences in PGI-I by mesh type. VAS scores decreased in all groups, but PFDI and PFIQ did not improve in pain patients. CONCLUSIONS: In women experiencing a pain complication after urogynaecological mesh insertion, mesh removal often does not improve symptoms. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Only 33% of women with pain complications have improved symptoms after urogynaecological mesh removal.

Postoperative Lower Extremity Neuropathy With Boot Stirrups Compared With Candy Cane Stirrups.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether candy cane stirrup use is associated with an increased risk of lower extremity peripheral neuropathy compared with boot stirrups in women undergoing surgery requiring dorsal lithotomy positioning. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study (June 2008-August 2015) included patients who underwent gynecologic surgery for benign indication lasting 60 minutes or longer in the lithotomy position. Patients with preexisting neurologic disease were excluded. Stirrup type, demographics, medical history, surgical factors, and relevant outcomes were collected from the medical record. Postoperative neuropathy was identified in clinical diagnoses or in physician documentation through the 6-week postoperative visit. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared using Student's t test, χ2 test, or Fisher exact test. Logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for other clinical characteristics associated with the outcome at P≤.1. RESULTS: The study included 2,449 patients, 1,838 (75.1%) with boot and 611 (24.9%) with candy cane stirrups. Women positioned in boot stirrups were younger (mean age 45.6 years [SD 13.5] vs 55.9 [SD 15.7] years; P<.001), heavier (mean body mass index [BMI] 31.5 [SD 8.7] vs 29.6 [SD 7.0]; P<.001), more likely to smoke (n=396 [21.5%] vs n=105 [17.2%]; P=.021), and had longer surgical duration (mean 176.5 minutes [SD 90.0] vs 145.3 [SD 63.9] minutes; P<.001), respectively. Diabetes (8.3%) did not differ between the groups (P=.122. Neuropathy occurred less often in the boot cohort (n=29, 1.6%, 95% CI 1.1-2.3%) than in the candy cane cohort (n=21, 3.4%, 95% CI 2.1-5.2%) (P=.008). After adjusting for age, BMI, smoking, anesthesia type and surgical time, only candy cane stirrup type (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.87, 95% CI 1.59-5.19) and surgical time (per hour) (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.20-1.63) were independently associated with postoperative neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Candy cane stirrups are associated with a significantly increased risk of lower extremity postoperative neuropathy compared with boot stirrups for women undergoing gynecologic surgery for benign indication.

Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Repair and the Rise and Fall of Transvaginal Mesh. Did We Come Full Circle? A Historical Perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To present a brief historical review of treatment options for pelvic organ prolapse with a focus on anterior vaginal wall defects and highlight changing practice patterns in the era of synthetic mesh controversy. METHODS: A MEDLINE and PubMed search was performed using the keywords pelvic organ prolapse, anterior colporrhaphy, and cystocele followed by a manual search of bibliographies. RESULTS: Ancient treatments included Hippocratic succession, local astringent, and use of pomegranates as crude pessaries. More sophisticated surgical techniques evolved in the 19th century with further refinement in the early 20th century. Numerous native tissue apposition techniques were popularized by Kelly, Kennedy, Burch, and Raz. Due to poor durability, surgeons sought alternate approaches including biologic and synthetic grafts. Synthetic transvaginal mesh (TVM) initially included use of Tantalum and Marlex to repair anterior wall defects. Both were eventually abandoned due to complications. TVM was re-designed, re-marketed, and re-introduced. Type 1 polypropylene monofilament TVM use became ubiquitous in female pelvic surgery peaking between 2004 and 2008. Initial promising outcomes were soon eclipsed by a surge of adverse events leading to multiple FDA warnings, reclassification to Class III, high-risk medical device, and ultimately a complete recall in 2019. CONCLUSION: The bidirectional pendulum swing on use of synthetic TVM has been occurring since its introduction 50 years ago. In the current era of mesh controversy, more practitioners are now revisiting previously described native tissue and biologic graft techniques. It appears that history has repeated itself.

Clinical Perspective Concerning Abdominal Entry Techniques.

OBJECTIVE: Entry into the abdomen during operative laparoscopy is a source of some controversy regarding the safest and most useful method. The objective of this review is to describe, compare, and contrast the most popular entry techniques. DATA SOURCES: Data were collected from the historical starting point until present day from English language journal articles and book chapters. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Descriptive accounts dating back to the start of laparoscopy in the 1970s and spanning to present day well-designed randomized controlled trials and Cochrane reviews were compiled to evaluate the evidence for the effectiveness and safety of abdominal entry techniques. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The most common sites of entry are the umbilicus and the left upper quadrant. Between the Veress needle, direct trocar insertion, and open entry there is no high-quality evidence to suggest that any of these offers a universal safety advantage. The Veress needle is still the most used among gynecologists and facilitates primary trocar placement. Direct trocar entry under laparoscopic visualization may be underused, is faster, and may result in fewer failed entries. Open (Hasson) entry can be more technically challenging, but may be best for patients with suspected intra-abdominal adhesions. CONCLUSION: Surgeon comfort is critical in choosing the entry site, method, and equipment. Surgeon familiarity with entry-failure troubleshooting, possible complications, and management is essential because major entry complications are rare in modern laparoscopy but critical because the essential steps of recognition and management can be lifesaving.

Demonstration of Safe Entry Techniques for Laparoscopy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate different techniques, and detail the considerations for obtaining primary laparoscopic access in gynecologic surgery. DESIGN: Video demonstration of the techniques with narrated discussion of each method. SETTING: The methods for primary entry in laparoscopy vary by location and technique [1,2]. There are inherent risks with any mode of primary entry, and the risks are also specific to each technique [3-6]. The choice for primary entry depends on the patient's anatomy, surgical history, pathology, and surgeon preference [1,2]. INTERVENTIONS: This video reviews considerations for choosing the safest entry point and tips for proper entry technique [4,7-10]. The entry sites reviewed include the umbilicus, left upper quadrant, right upper quadrant, and supraumbilical [11]. The entry technique can be either open (Hasson), closed (Veress), or by direct laparoscopic visualization [9,10,12-14]. CONCLUSION: No single laparoscopic entry technique is superior [3]. The safest and most successful entry method will vary by case characteristics and surgeon training.

Robotic glove port technique for the endowristed rigid instruments in robotic single-site transabdominal and transvaginal surgery.

Although robotic single-site (RSS) surgery employing cross setup of semirigid instruments allows effective triangulation of instruments, it has some limitations in performing RSS transabdominal and transvaginal surgeries. We introduced the robotic glove port technique (RGPT) using parallel setup of endowristed rigid instruments in performing RSS transabdominal surgery and transvaginal surgery in July of 2017. Thirty-five patients underwent RSS surgery with RGPT. Twenty-one patients had RSS transabdominal reconstructive or fertility-preserving surgeries such as myomectomy (12 patients), adenomyomectomy (3 patients), and ovarian endometriosis cystectomy (6 patients). Fourteen patients underwent robotic transvaginal surgery for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) hysterectomy. All procedures were successfully performed, and no postoperative complications were observed. In all patients, the median total operative time, console time, and docking time were 160 min (range 106-240), 120 min (range 65-180), and 10 min (range 4-25), respectively. There was no conversion to another type of surgery, such as conventional laparoscopy, laparotomy, or traditional multiport robotic surgery. The findings showed that RSS surgery via the RGPT is safe and feasible, using the parallel setup of endowristed rigid instruments is easily performed on transvaginal routes and transabdominal routes. Therefore, this procedure may be an important complement to gynecologic surgeons' armamentarium in the field of robotic reconstructive or fertility-preserving surgeries such as myomectomy, adenomyomectomy, ovarian cystectomy, and transvaginal surgery for NOTES hysterectomy. Nevertheless, further prospective controlled studies are needed to determine its full clinical application.

Inaccuracies in News Media Reporting About the 2019 US Food and Drug Administration Ban on Transvaginal Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze inaccuracies in the news media reporting of the 2019 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ban on surgical mesh for transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: We queried the NexisUni media database for English-language news articles about "transvaginal mesh" or "FDA" published before and after the ban. Content analysis was based on discussion of the ban, indications for surgical mesh, and assessment of bias. We characterized public interest in transvaginal mesh using Google Trends. RESULTS: Of 290 news articles reviewed, 42 articles were included for analysis. Public interest in transvaginal mesh increased 4-fold after the FDA announcement. While 15 articles (38%) accurately reported that mesh was used in both POP and incontinence repairs, a plurality (18, 43%) only described using mesh for POP. The majority (30, 71%) of articles did not specify that the FDA ban applied to only transvaginal repair of POP and not to incontinence. Despite multiple professional societies affirming the use of mesh for incontinence, only 2 (5%) articles cited these evidence-based recommendations. About half of the articles had an overtly biased tone; articles with an anti-mesh bias were significantly less likely to identify the mesh indications relevant to the ban (P <.01). CONCLUSION: Seventy percent of news reports about the 2019 FDA ban on transvaginal mesh for POP failed to distinguish between the clinical indications for mesh impacted by the ban. The findings raise concern about patient perceptions of and future access to mesh surgery, regardless of indication.

A uniaxial force and stiffness model of the vagina during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is the preferred procedure for restoring vaginal vault prolapse. An assistant uses a vaginal manipulator to position and tension the vault such that the surgeon can dissect the bladder, rectum and vault to eventually suture a synthetic mesh used to suspend the vagina to the longitudinal anterior vertebral ligament. Vaginal vault manipulation requires application of high forces for long periods of time. METHODS: This work quantifies the task by measuring and analyzing the interaction forces and the workspace during vaginal vault manipulation. From the measurements we developed a uniaxial model, expressing the increase in interaction force and stiffness of the vagina. By adapting the model parameters, the difference in interaction force and stiffness between moderate and severe prolapse is predicted. FINDINGS: For moderate prolapse the average interaction force and stiffness start at 2.56 N and 0.11 N mm-1 in the tensionfree state, and go up to 20.14 N and 0.53 N mm-1 after complete insertion of the instrument. For severe degrees of prolapse, tissue interaction is much lower starting at 1.68 N and 0.06 N mm-1 while staying limited to 12.20 N and 0.30 N mm-1 at full extension. INTERPRETATION: Population data shows that the stage of prolapse and total vaginal length increase with age and parity. The interaction force and stiffness of the vagina are correlated with this degree of prolapse. By adapting the model parameters a good estimation of the tissue interaction is found for patients with mild and severe prolapse.

Wireless Laparoscopy in the 2020s: State-of-the-Art Technology in Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Wireless signal transduction is the future in the field of laparoscopic surgery. Cable-free endoscopic equipment would be the ideal surgical instrument for every laparoscopic surgeon. INSTRUMENT: Our department has developed a new cable-free laparoscopic setup that couples a rigid 0°, 10-mm laparoscope with a wireless camera modified with a special adapter. We used a portable and rechargeable LED cold light source. The signal was wirelessly transmitted from the camera to a tablet computer using the corresponding mobile application. EXPERIENCE: Our team has used this setup in 14 laparoscopic operations with excellent results. Two cases performed exclusively with the new setup are presented in the videos. The image quality obtained was comparable with the conventional laparoscopic setup, and the operations performed were unaffected. CONCLUSION: This report presents the use of a wireless camera throughout the course of a laparoscopic surgery, and the results are promising. The new systems' favorable characteristics, such as wireless signal transmission, cost, flexibility, and size, support this as a feasible new technique for performing laparoscopic surgery.

Candy Cane Compared With Boot Stirrups in Vaginal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in physical function at 6 weeks after vaginal surgery among women positioned in candy cane and boot stirrups. METHODS: We conducted a single-masked, randomized controlled trial of women undergoing vaginal surgery with either candy cane or boot stirrup use. The primary outcome was a change in the PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) physical function short form-20a from baseline to 6 weeks after surgery. To achieve 80% power to detect a moderate Cohen effect (d=0.5), we required 64 participants in each group. RESULTS: From March 2018 to October 2019, 141 women were randomized, and 138 women (72 in the candy cane group and 66 in the boot stirrup group) were included in the final analysis. There were no baseline differences in participant characteristics including age, body mass index, comorbidities, or preoperative history of joint replacements. There were no between-group differences in surgery type, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, or adverse events at 6 weeks postoperation. Participants in the candy cane group demonstrated worse physical function at 6 weeks compares with the improvement seen in those in the boot stirrup group; this was significantly different between groups (-1.9±7.9 candy cane vs 1.9±7.0 boot, P<.01). CONCLUSION: Women undergoing vaginal surgery positioned in boot stirrups have significantly better physical function at 6 weeks after surgery when compared with women positioned in candy cane stirrups. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03446950.

Easy mesh fixation to the promontory during sacrocolpopexy procedure.

We propose a simplified technique to approach the promontory and to fix the mesh on the anterior longitudinal ligament during the sacrocolpopexy procedure by using an instrument initially designed for the vaginal approach of the sacrospinous ligament. Using this easy technique in case of anatomic variations on the sacral promontory may avoid complications.

Pelvic organ prolapse management.

Pelvic organ prolapse describes the loss of support and subsequent descent of pelvic organs into the vagina. It is common, affecting up to 50% of parous women, and can be accompanied by a number of burdening symptoms. Prolapse has been thrown into the spotlight secondary to mesh-related complications. There are a number of effective treatment options to consider when managing pelvic organ prolapse and most do not require mesh. Patients' choice, comorbidities and likelihood of treatment success should be considered when making decisions about their care. Vaginal mesh surgery is currently on hold in the UK and even prior to this there has been a reduction both in the number of all prolapse surgeries and the number of women seeking surgery to manage their symptoms. This article reviews the current evidence for the management of pelvic organ prolapse, providing an update on the current state of mesh in prolapse surgery and summarises the key evidence points derived from the literature.

Vaginal surgery: don't get bent out of shape.

Vaginal hysterectomy rates in the United States are decreasing, despite it being the recommended hysterectomy route for benign hysterectomy by multiple societies. Visualization issues are a known barrier to a medical student learning in the operating room, and it is likely that this also extends to resident training. In addition, vaginal surgery can be taxing on both the surgeons and assistants, with high rates of musculoskeletal work disorders reported in vaginal surgeons. The use of a camera is integral to endoscopic surgery, and table-mounted retractor systems have been used for decades in open surgery. We bring these 2 features into vaginal surgery, that is, using a table-mounted camera system and a table-mounted vaginal retractor. When used together as demonstrated in this video, these tools can improve visualization and may improve ergonomics for the entire surgical team, including learners, during vaginal surgery.

Single-Port Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy With Magnetic Retraction: A Video Demonstration.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is the gold standard for treatment of apical prolapse.1 Minimally invasive surgery offers many advantages over the open approach, including incision size, blood loss, postoperative pain while maintaining similar long-term outcomes.2,3 OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and feasibility of performing a magnetic-assisted single-port robotic sacrocolpopexy (MARS). MATERIALS: Prior to surgery, a magnetic controller was secured to the surgical bed. The Hassan technique was used to place a 25 mm SP port through a single 2.5 cm supra-umbilical incision. A 12 mm assistant port was placed 10 cm lateral to the SP port on the right side, this additional trocar placement may be obviated by using a gel-point for both ports. The SP robot was docked on the right side of the bed. The magnet was clipped onto the sigmoid mesentery and the outer magnet was repositioned to retract the sigmoid laterally. The sacral promontory was exposed, and the peritoneal incision was carried down to the vagina. The magnet was repositioned, and the bladder was reflected off the anterior vagina. The posterior dissection was carried out to reveal the posterior vagina. "Y" mesh was placed, appropriately tensioned, secured to the sacral promontory and retroperitonealized. Cystoscopy was performed. The magnet was removed from the sigmoid colon, and all incisions were closed. RESULTS: A 66-year-old G2P2 female, BMI 25, status-post prior abdominal hysterectomy presented with symptomatic stage IV prolapse. Surgery was uneventful with an operative time of 247 minutes and an estimated blood loss of 10cc. The patient was discharged the following day. At 3 months postoperatively, she had anatomic and symptomatic resolution of her prolapse. CONCLUSION: Using magnetic assistance, MARS can be offered to women who want a durable option for prolapse repair with improved cosmesis compared to conventional methods and may offer cosmetic benefits when paired with a concurrent hysterectomy.

Non-absorbable versus absorbable sutures for anterior colporrhaphy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in South Korea.

INTRODUCTION: The anterior vaginal wall is the segment most commonly affected by prolapse. Traditionally, anterior vaginal wall prolapse is repaired via anterior colporrhaphy, which is known to have a high recurrence rate. Several factors might affect the outcome of anterior colporrhaphy, and the use of absorbable sutures might also be associated with the high recurrence rate because the sutures might not be able to retain adequate strength until the plicated pubocervical fascia remodels and regains maximum tensile strength. Nonetheless, no comparative data exist about the relative efficacy and safety of anterior colporrhaphy using non-absorbable versus absorbable sutures. The objective of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of anterior colporrhaphy using non-absorbable sutures with those of anterior colporrhaphy using absorbable sutures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a randomised, multicentre, superiority trial. Anterior colporrhaphy will be performed in a traditional manner with midline plication of the fibromuscular layer using either non-absorbable or absorbable sutures. The primary outcome is composite surgical success 1 year after surgery defined as the absence of all of the following: (1) anterior vaginal descent beyond the hymen, (2) the presence of vaginal bulge symptoms and (3) retreatment for recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse with either surgery or pessary. The secondary outcomes include the individual components of the composite primary end point, anatomical outcomes, condition-specific quality of life and adverse events related to anterior colporrhaphy. The planned number of participants is 192. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Hospital (H-1810-037-977). The results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals, and the findings will be presented at scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03736811.